Visual Discrimination Learning In Rats Research Articles

Positive and negative feedback learning and associated dopamine and serotonin transporter binding after methamphetamine

Learning from mistakes and prospectively adjusting behavior in response to reward feedback is an important facet of performance monitoring. Dopamine (DA) pathways play an important role in feedback learning and a growing literature has also emerged on the importance of serotonin (5HT) in reward learning, particularly during punishment or reward omission (negative feedback). Cognitive impairments resulting from psychostimulant exposure may arise from altered patterns in feedback learning, which in turn may be modulated by DA and 5HT transmission. We analyzed long-term, off-drug changes in learning from positive and negative feedback and associated striatal DA transporter (DAT) and frontocortical 5HT transporter (SERT) binding in rats pretreated with methamphetamine (mAMPH). Specifically, we assessed the reversal phase of pairwise visual discrimination learning in rats receiving single dose- (mAMPHsingle) vs. escalating-dose exposure (mAMPHescal). Using fine-grained trial-by-trial analyses, we found increased sensitivity to and reliance on positive feedback in mAMPH-pretreated animals, with the mAMPHsingle group showing more pronounced use of this type of feedback. In contrast, overall negative feedback sensitivity was not altered following any mAMPH treatment. In addition to validating the enduring effects of mAMPH on early reversal learning, we found more consecutive error commissions before the first correct response in mAMPH-pretreated rats. This behavioral rigidity was negatively correlated with subregional frontocortical SERT whereas positive feedback sensitivity negatively correlated with striatal DAT binding. These results provide new evidence for the overlapping, yet dissociable roles of DA and 5HT systems in overcoming perseveration and in learning new reward rules.

Muscimol, AP5, or scopolamine infused into perirhinal cortex impairs two-choice visual discrimination learning in rats

The perirhinal cortex (PRh) has been strongly implicated in object recognition memory and visual stimulus representation. Studies of object recognition have revealed evidence for the involvement of several neurotransmitter subsystems, including those involving NMDA ( N-methyl- d-aspartic acid) and muscarinic cholinergic receptors. In the present study, we assessed the possible involvement of PRh and related receptor subsystems in two-choice visual discrimination learning by Lister Hooded rats tested in touchscreen-equipped operant boxes. In Experiment 1, daily pre-training inactivation of PRh with the GABA A receptor agonist muscimol (0.5 μg/hemisphere) significantly impaired acquisition of the two-choice visual discrimination. In Experiment 2, daily pre-training blockade of either NMDA or muscarinic receptors in PRh with AP5 (5.9 μg/hemisphere) or scopolamine (10 μg/hemisphere), respectively, impaired task acquisition. These results parallel the findings from object recognition studies and suggest a generality of neurotransmitter receptor involvement underlying the role of PRh in both object recognition memory and visual discrimination learning. The involvement of PRh in both types of tasks may be related to its role in complex visual stimulus representation.

Visual discrimination learning in rats with striatal kainic acid lesions

Intrastriatal kainic acid (KA) administration induces selective neuronal cell death in the striatum sparing passing nerve fibers and terminals. Although performance deficits of several kinds of learning tasks have been reported in striatal KA-lesioned rats, the problem remains unsolved whether these animals can discriminate visual stimuli to acquire such learning tasks. This study investigated, therefore, the effects of intrastriatal KA administration on the acquisition of vertical vs. horizontal stripe discrimination learning. Striatal KA-lesioned rats did not show any deficit in the process of learning this task in comparison with vehicle-treated control rats. Results suggest that learning deficits that have been reported in animals with a loss of striatal neurons cannot be explained by deficits of visual discrimination ability such as measured in this study.

Restricted lesions to ventral prefrontal subareas block reversal learning but not visual discrimination learning in rats

LI, L. AND J. SHAO. Restricted lesions to ventral prefrontal subareas block reversal learning but not visual discrimination learning in rats. PHYSIOL BEHAV 65(2) 371–379, 1998.—Previous studies have shown that extensive damage to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of rats causes reversal learning deficits. The mPFC of rats, however, consists of several subareas that are different from each other in both cytoarchitecture and neural connectivity, suggesting a functional dissociation among the mPFC subareas. In the present study, selective lesions of the mPFC of rats were made with a specially designed microknife whose intracranial placement could be controlled stereotaxically. Restricted lesions were made to each of the 3 parts of the mPFC: the anterior cingulate area (AC) (including the medial precentral area, PrCm), the prelimbic area (PL), and the infralimbic area (IL). One week after surgery, rats were trained in an aversively motivated visual discrimination task in a novel rotating T-maze. After reaching the acquisition criterion, rats were trained in a reversal task in the same maze. No difference was found in acquisition between control and mPFC lesioned rats. However, lesions of either the PL or the IL produced a marked deficit in the reversal task. This behavioral deficit was not found in rats with lesions of the AC. The results indicate that the mPFC of rats is not essential for discrimination learning, but that each of the 2 ventral subareas of the mPFC, PL, and IL, plays a critical role in reversal learning.

Synaptic plasticity and learning: selective impairment of learning rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor antagonist AP5

This paper reports a series of 5 experiments concerned with a possible role for N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in certain types of learning. The results show that chronic intraventricular infusion of the NMDA receptor antagonist D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (D,L-AP5) caused an impairment of spatial but not of visual discrimination learning in rats. Such selectivity of the learning impairment occurred despite widespread distribution of the drug throughout the CNS. AP5 sometimes caused a disturbance of sensorimotor function during learning, but one experiment addressing whether this disturbance could be responsible for the spatial learning impairment established that it was statistically independent. Another experiment showed that AP5 did not affect the retention of previously acquired spatial information. These behavioral effects were all obtained with a concentration of AP5 that, in a final study, was found to be sufficient to block hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) in vivo without affecting normal synaptic transmission. Taken together, these observations (1) implicate NMDA receptors in certain types of learning, and (2) extend recent work showing that saturation of LTP causes an anterograde spatial amnesia (McNaughton et al., 1986). A preliminary report of parts of this work has been published (Morris et al., 1986a).

Visual Discrimination Learning in Rats with Lesions of Superior Colliculus: Door-Push and Approach Errors in Modified Jumping Stand

It has been suggested that, for some species, lesions of the superior colliculus affect visual discrimination learning, but only in certain conditions: (a) when problems are first learnt only after operation, or (b) when discriminanda require detailed scanning, or (c) when “approach” responses to the discriminanda are measured, rather than the response of actually touching them. These suggestions were examined in rats learning visual discriminations in a modified jumping-stand apparatus, after sustaining large lesions of the superior colliculus (and in some cases also of the pretectum). The lesions produced open-field hyperactivity and reduced exploration, indicating effective tectal damage, but the rats learnt a series of difficult discriminations in a door-push task as fast as normal rats, and they did not make more approach errors. Their main abnormality in the discrimination apparatus was that they looked less often between the stimulus doors before stepping across to one of them from the central platform. It is suggested that in rats, as in other animals, lesions of the superior colliculus disrupt the control of scanning head and eye movements; in rats, however, such disruption need not affect discrimination learning (at least in some kinds of apparatus), possibly because the retina of the rat has a relatively poorly developed area centralis.