Introduction: Variability in timing of initial tracheostomy has been described in pediatric patients. However, variability in timing from tracheostomy to PICU discharge has not been described, nor have factors that affect discharge timing have been identified. There are factors beyond the degree of critical illness which affect discharge from PICU, such as rehabilitation facilities, availability of a technology dependent unit within the hospital, and social resources to care for complex technology dependent patients. Methods: The Virtual PICU Systems database was used to analyze a multicenter sample of 2365 patients who received an initial tracheostomy during the PICU stay. Quantile regression was used to identify factors related to timing of discharge following the tracheostomy. Results: The median PICU length of stay (PLOS) after tracheostomy was 10.8d (7.0 – 21.1), which was longer than that predicted by the PRISM3 score (6 days, p< 0.001). Patients admitted with higher PIM2 and PRISM3 s had longer PLOS (p< 0.001 and 0.021). Compared to neonates, children < 2yrs had a significant shorter LOS (-6.8d, p=0.043) and all age groups >2yrs had a significantly shorter LOS (-10d, all p< 0.008). There were no differences in LOS by race or sex. A healthier baseline Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) and a larger POPC change at baseline to discharge were inversely associated with PLOS (p=0.015 and 0.017, respectively). Patients hospitalized for cardiac indications had longer LOS, while those with primary immune or heme/onc diagnoses had shorter PLOS (all p< 0.01). Having a foreign payer was associated with a shorter PLOS (-4d, p=0.001). Conclusions: In patients who received initial tracheostomy, there was variability in the timing from tracheostomy to PICU discharge. These patients had a longer PLOS than predicted by their degree of critical illness. This presents a potential for more efficient, cost-effective care for patients who are medically appropriate for PICU discharge but require complex care coordination. At a conservative estimate of $2500 difference from PICU to a step-down charge per day, would represent nearly a $25 million in potential cost savings in this patient group if actual LOS was the same as PRISM3 predicted LOS.