Views Of Health Care Providers Research Articles

Delays to accessing healthcare for older adults with disabilities in Bengaluru, India: views of healthcare providers and older adults

Introduction A person’s ability to live independently may be limited by physical and cognitive declines associated with ageing, including disabilities that affect mobility and self-care. This study examines the delays to accessing healthcare facilities among older adults who are frail or have disabilities, using the three-delays model. Methods A qualitative study was conducted during March and April 2022 among 21 older adults (aged 60 or above) who were frail or disabled (using assistive devices) in Bengaluru and nine key informants, consisting of geriatricians, physiotherapists, psychologists and NGO workers. Data were analysed using NVivo 12. Results Delays in accessing healthcare for older adults were attributed to multidimensional factors related to the individual (disability; lack of trust in healthcare workers; low/no income), the community and household (neglect/lack of awareness by the family; limited, inaccessible and unaffordable transport modes) and the health system (poor staffing; under-supplied healthcare facilities; waiting times at the hospital). Delays led to complications, hospitalisations and financial burdens for the older adults. The key informant interviews supported these findings. Conclusion This research highlights that it is important to overcome delays in accessing healthcare for older adults to ensure better health and wellbeing among this group. A holistic approach is needed to reach out to individuals, communities and households, and the healthcare system. Providing adequate transport services to hospitals should be planned in conjunction with the health department for timely delivery of care. Providing health insurance for older adults and improving geriatric care would be highly beneficial to improving health outcomes.

Opioid access barriers for cancer pain relief in Vietnam: A qualitative study.

154 Background: Although the World Health Organization designates opioids as an essential medication and recommends them as the cornerstone for managing moderate to severe cancer pain, their accessibility is severely restricted, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Despite Vietnam's early endeavors in the advancement of palliative care, including a revised opioid prescription policy in 2008, opioid use for cancer pain remains suboptimal, with oral morphine available only in a few major hospitals. To inform comprehensive strategies for improving opioid access, this study aims to explore the views of healthcare providers, regulators, cancer patients, and caregivers in Vietnam on the barriers to safely accessing opioids for cancer pain management. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, descriptive study and recruited five healthcare providers, six cancer patients and caregivers, and six regulators (i.e., policymakers in the Ministry of Health, heads or deputy heads of pharmacy, oncology, or palliative care departments) across Vietnam via purposeful sampling technique. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, and the audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and subjected to inductive content analysis using a Framework Method. Results: Five categories of barriers were identified: 1) Patient-related barriers (fear of addiction and other side effects, morphine's association with impending death, negative administration experiences, religious beliefs); 2) Professional-related barriers (knowledge and experience deficit, fear of addiction and other side effects, concerns about opioid diversion and associated liabilities, lack of guidance, education, and training); 3) Medicine-related barriers (limited oral morphine availability, limited domestic pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers, supply interruptions, poor variety of opioid types and formulations, difficulties accessing parenteral opioids); 4) Services delivery barriers (scarce palliative and home care services); 5) Regulatory barriers (lack of information on opioid distribution channels, difficulties obtaining confirmation letters for patients' opioid usage needs, overly strict regulation enforcement). Conclusions: Barriers to opioid access for cancer pain control in Vietnam are multifactorial and mutually reinforcing, necessitating interdisciplinary solutions to overcome them. This approach should involve enhancing education about the appropriate use and management of opioids, along with current opioid policies for patients, communities, healthcare providers, and regulators; enacting and implementing policies mandating oral morphine availability at local health facilities; expanding palliative care services; utilizing telemedicine; and establishing an electronic opioid prescription monitoring system.

Discharge against medical advice in rural and remote emergency departments: views of healthcare providers.

The aim of the study was to explore, in one remote hospital, emergency department healthcare providers' experience and perceptions of the factors surrounding a patient's decision to discharge against medical advice (DAMA). The secondary objective was to gain insight into staff experiences of the current protocols for managing DAMA cases and explore their recommendations for reducing DAMA incidence. This was a cross-sectional study involving a survey and semi-structured interviews exploring healthcare providers' (n=19) perceptions of factors perceived to be influencing DAMA, current practice for managing DAMA and recommendations for practice improvements. Health professionals (doctors, nurses, Aboriginal Health Workers) all worked in the emergency department of a remote community hospital, Queensland, Australia. Responses relating to influencing factors for DAMA were provided on a three-point rating scale from 'no influence/little influence' to 'very strong influence'. DAMA management protocol responses were a three-point rating scale from 'rarely/never' to 'always'. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the survey and explored participants' perceptions in greater detail and current DAMA management protocol. Feedback from the total of 19 participants across the professions presented four prominent yet interconnected themes: patient, culture, health service and health provider, and health literacy and education-related factors. Factors that were perceived to have a strong influence on DAMA events included alcohol and drug abuse (100%), a lack of culturally sensitive healthcare services (94.7%), and family commitments or obligations (89.5%). Healthcare provider recommendations for preventing DAMA presented themes of right communication, culturally safe care (right place, right time) and the right staff to support DAMA prevention. The healthcare providers described the pivotal role the Indigenous Liaison Officer (ILO) plays and the importance of this position being filled. DAMA is a multifaceted issue, influenced by both personal and hospital system-related factors. Participants agreed that the presence of ILO and/or Aboriginal Health Workers in the emergency department may reduce DAMA occurrences for Indigenous Australians who are disproportionately represented in DAMA rates, particularly in rural and remote regions of Australia.

The contribution of birth plans to shared decision-making from the perspectives of women, their partners and their healthcare providers.

The birth plan is a document expressing a pregnant woman's childbirth preferences, enabling communication of expectations and facilitating discussions among women, their partners, and healthcare providers for key birthing decisions. There has been limited research on the role of birth plans in shared decision-making (SDM). Our study aims to explore how the use of birth plans can contribute to SDM from women's, partners, and healthcare providers' perspectives. We conducted in-depth interviews with women, their partners, and their healthcare providers. We used a thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Furthermore, we created a grounded theory about the role of birth plans as a tool in SDM. Three main themes were created: ''Creating a birth plan", ''Getting all on board" and ''Birth plans in the daily practice of decision-making". Most women, partners, and healthcare providers agreed that birth plans can facilitate communication and SDM. Women and their partners viewed the birth plan as a tool to prepare for birth. Most healthcare providers mentioned the birth plan as a tool to get to know the women, their partners, and their preferences. Barriers are the attitude of healthcare providers toward birth plans, such as their evident resistance to the birth plan itself or to certain preferences. Another barrier is the assumption women and their partners may have that these plans can accurately predict the childbirth experience, enhancing the chance of a disappointing, negative experience. Some healthcare providers view birth plans as barriers to SDM. The use of a birth plan seems to promote women's, partners', and healthcare providers' involvement in the birth process, and seems suitable to facilitate SDM. Further research is required to explore strategies for overcoming barriers, including healthcare providers' attitudes toward birth plans and the expectations of women and their partners regarding their role.

“I suppose in our culture, old means no sex”: PLWH and healthcare provider views on factors influencing late HIV testing and diagnosis among older adults in Malaysia

ABSTRACT The proportion of new HIV diagnoses among older adults aged ≥50 years continues to rise. Older adults are at higher risk of late diagnosis which is associated with higher treatment complexity and poorer health outcomes. Few studies in the Asia-Pacific region have explored factors contributing to late presentation and diagnosis in this population. Thus, our study aimed to explore factors influencing late HIV diagnosis among older adults ≥50 years in Malaysia. We conducted in-depth interviews with 16 older adults newly diagnosed with HIV (OPLWH) and focus group discussions with seven healthcare providers (HCPs) from different specialties in an academic tertiary hospital in Malaysia. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Three main themes related to late diagnosis among OPLWH emerged: (1) challenge in recognizing HIV symptoms among older persons, (2) older persons and HCPs having low index of suspicion of HIV and (3) poor acceptance of HIV testing among older persons due to perceived personal and social identities. HCPs often missed HIV symptoms and these collectively culminated in OPLWH experiencing complex diagnostic journeys resulting in late HIV diagnosis. To reduce delays in HIV diagnosis, strategies are needed to improve HIV knowledge and risk perception among both older adults and HCPs.

U.S. Healthcare Provider Views and Practices Regarding Planned Birth Setting.

We conducted 19 in-depth, semistructured, qualitative interviews of eight obstetricians, eight midwives, and three pediatricians from across the United States. Interviews explored healthcare providers' interpretation of the current evidence and their personal and professional experiences with childbirth within the existing medical, ethical, and legal context in the United States. Themes emerged concerning risks and benefits, decision-making, and patient-provider power dynamics. Collectively, the narratives illuminated fundamental ideological tensions between in- and out-of-hospital providers arising from divergent assignment of value to described risks and benefits. The majority of physicians focused on U.S.-specific data demonstrating increased neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with delayed access to hospital-based interventions, thereby justifying hospital birth as the standard of care. By contrast, midwives emphasized data demonstrating fewer interventions and superior maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-income European countries, where out-of-hospital birth is more common for low-risk birthing people. A key gap in counseling was revealed, as no interviewees offered anticipatory counseling regarding birth setting options. Providers directly and indirectly illustrated the propensity for asymmetric power relations between birth providers and pregnant people, especially in hospital settings. The narratives highlight the common goal of optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes despite tensions arising from divergent prioritization of specific maternal and neonatal risks. Our findings suggest opportunities to foster collaboration and optimize outcomes via mutual respect and improved integration of care.

Barriers and facilitators in implementing early essential newborn care of well-born babies in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-method systematic review.

Evidences have demonstrated the effectiveness of early essential newborn care. However, the implementation of early essential newborn care is suboptimal. The aim is to identify and synthesise the barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of early essential newborn care in low- and middle-income countries. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, SinoMed and Google Scholar. Two authors independently screened, performed quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extracted data. This review includes papers that reported the barriers and facilitators of implementing early essential newborn care in low- and middle-income countries from the view of healthcare providers. Barriers and facilitators were coded according to the consolidated framework for implementation research in a deductive way and then been inducted into five common themes. This review followed synthesis without meta-analysis reporting guideline. A total of 28 studies were included. Five inductive common themes influencing implementing early essential newborn care in low- and middle-income countries were system-level healthcare factors, healthcare providers' knowledge and beliefs, the requirements of mothers or families, adapting to routine practice and the working climate of organisation. The factors were from system level, facility level and individual level and were inducted into five themes. Based on this review, decision-makers could tailor implementing strategies to narrow the gap between the evidence and implementation. The study offers guidance for health professionals to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing early essential newborn care and make tailored strategies when implementing early essential newborn care. No patient or public contributions.

Language barriers during vaccination practice, the point of view of healthcare providers.

Language barriers are one of the main obstacles faced by migrants in accessing healthcare services. A compromised communication between migrants and Healthcare Providers in vaccination setting can result in increased vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccine uptake. The objective of the current study is to investigate Healthcare Providers' perceptions about linguistic barriers faced during both routinary vaccination practice and the extraordinary vaccination program for Ukrainian refugees in the Local Health Authorities of Bologna and Romagna (Italy). A cross-sectional study was conducted through the administration of a questionnaire examining Healthcare Providers' perceptions. A descriptive analysis and a multiple logistic regression model were adopted to analyze the collected data. Language barriers resulted as an obstacle to informed consent and to doctor-patient relationship. The strategies adopted were perceived as helpful in increasing vaccination adherence, despite communication difficulties were still experienced during refugees' vaccinations. Results suggest that the implementation of translated material and the use of professional interpreters may represent important strategies to overcome linguistic barriers, along with Healthcare Providers' training. Healthcare Providers' opinions could assist the implementation of new tools capable of countering language barriers. The current study represents an example of providers' involvement in understanding the complexities behind the issue of language barriers in vaccination practice.

ChatGPT Use Among Pediatric Health Care Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

The public launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT platform generated immediate interest in the use of large language models (LLMs). Health care institutions are now grappling with establishing policies and guidelines for the use of these technologies, yet little is known about how health care providers view LLMs in medical settings. Moreover, there are no studies assessing how pediatric providers are adopting these readily accessible tools. The aim of this study was to determine how pediatric providers are currently using LLMs in their work as well as their interest in using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant version of ChatGPT in the future. A survey instrument consisting of structured and unstructured questions was iteratively developed by a team of informaticians from various pediatric specialties.The survey was sent via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to all Boston Children's Hospital pediatric providers.Participation was voluntary and uncompensated, and all survey responses were anonymous. Surveys were completed by 390 pediatric providers. Approximately 50% (197/390) of respondents had used an LLM; of these, almost 75% (142/197) were already using an LLM for nonclinical work and 27% (52/195) for clinical work. Providers detailed the various ways they are currently using an LLM in their clinical and nonclinical work. Only 29% (n=105) of 362 respondents indicated that ChatGPT should be used for patient care in its present state; however, 73.8% (273/368) reported they would use a HIPAA-compliant version of ChatGPT if one were available. Providers' proposed future uses of LLMs in health care are described. Despite significant concerns and barriers to LLM use in health care, pediatric providers are already using LLMs at work. This study will give policy makers needed information about how providers are using LLMs clinically.

Leading from the bottom: The clinical leaders roles in an HIV primary care facility in Eldoret, Kenya.

Clinical leaders in health systems play critical roles in making decisions that impact patient care and health system performance. Current literature has focused on the importance of clinical leaders' roles in healthcare settings and has not addressed the leadership aspect that clinical leaders engage in day-to-day decision-making in HIV facilities while providing HIV patient care. Therefore, identifying the leadership roles that wclinical leaders perform at HIV primary facilities is of critical importance. The study explored the views of healthcare providers working in AMPATH-MTRH HIV facility on what they perceived as the roles of clinical leaders at the HIV primary care facility. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study between December 2019 to May 2020, involving in-depth interviews with (n = 22) healthcare providers working in AMPATH-MTRH HIV facility, who were purposively and conveniently sampled to participate in in-depth interviews to explore perceptions regarding the leadership roles of clinical leaders. The collected data were analyzed thematically and Nvivo vs.12 software was used for data management. The following themes were identified from the analysis regarding perceived clinical leaders' roles in an HIV primary care facility: 1) Strategic roles: providing direction and guidance, ensuring goals and objectives of the department are achieved within the set timelines, planning, and budgeting for adequate resources to support patient HIV care 2) Interconnecting health systems levels and supervisory oversight roles: a link between management, staff, and patients, solving problems, organizing and attending departmental meetings, facilitate staff training, accountable, collaborating with other departments and leaders, defines and assigns responsibilities, ensure quality patient service, coordination, and management of daily activities 3) Research roles: data collation, analysis, generation, review and reporting to the management. Clinical leaders in the HIV care system perform leadership roles that are characterized by strategic, middle-level, supervisorial and research which reflects the model of the leadership and management style of the HIV care system. The understanding of these roles contributes valuable insights to HIV leaders and managers to recognize the important contribution of clinical leaders and consider reviewing Standard Operating Procedures to include these leadership roles and strengthen their capacity to maximize clinicians' contribution to improve HIV care and enhance responsive health systems.

Impact of a capacity-building intervention on views and perceptions of healthcare providers towards the provision of adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in southeast Nigeria: a cross-sectional qualitative study

ObjectivesNegative views of healthcare providers towards adolescent sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services deter adolescents from seeking vital SRH services. This paper assessed the impact of an intervention on the...

Parent and healthcare provider views of live varicella vaccination of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

Live attenuated varicella vaccine (LAVV) has historically been contraindicated in children who are immunocompromised due to solid organ transplant (SOT) because of safety concerns. Recently, clinical guidelines were developed that support post-transplant varicella vaccination in selected SOT recipients based on emerging evidence of LAVV safety. This qualitative study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing the new guidelines, as well as acceptability of LAVV among healthcare providers (HCPs) and parents. HCPs and parents of transplant recipients were recruited from four sites using purposive sampling. Data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using an Interpretive Description approach that incorporated data from the interviews, academic knowledge and clinical experience, and drew from Grounded Theory and Thematic Analysis. The theoretical framework used was Adaptive Leadership. Thirty-four participants (16 HCPs and 18 parents) were included in the analysis. Parents developed skills in adaptive leadership that included strategies to protect their child against infectious diseases. Foundational information that live vaccines were absolutely contraindicated post-transplant "stuck" with parents and led them to develop strategies other than vaccination to keep their child safe. Some parents struggled to understand that information previously presented as a certainty (contraindication of LAVV) could change. Their approach to adaptive leadership informed their appraisal of the new vaccination guidelines and willingness to accept vaccination. HCPs should adopt a family-centered approach to communicating changing guidelines that considers parents' approach to adaptive leadership and discusses the changing nature of medical evidence. Trust between HCPs and parents can facilitate these conversations.

How do middle-aged patients and their healthcare providers manage multimorbidity? Results of a qualitative study.

It is particularly difficult for healthcare providers to deliver optimal medical care to multimorbid middle-aged persons because patients' professional activities, family lives, and other everyday responsibilities hinder them from making necessary lifestyle changes. Our aim was to find out how patients and healthcare providers view and manage the problems of dealing with multimorbidity in middle age. This qualitative study consisted of three steps. First, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 purposively sampled middle-aged persons living with multimorbidity to explore the experiences of care in the context of their leisure time, family lives, and work. Second, further individual interviews were carried out to find out the views of 14 healthcare providers. Third, the results of the interviews with patients and healthcare providers were presented to and discussed with four healthcare providers at an interprofessional workshop. Interview data was coded using an inductive-deductive approach and analyzed using content analysis. While patients reflected on challenges in several life domains, healthcare providers differentiated between levels of challenges. Both shared recommendations for better care including i) helping patients cope, ii) providing relief in activities of daily living, iii) continuity of care, iv) interprofessional cooperation, v) health promotion/prevention, vi) expansion of health services and vii) general system-level changes. Furthermore, the healthcare provider workshop highlighted the importance of increasing patient-centeredness, reducing complexity through a care coordinator and promoting interprofessional cooperation/networking. To further improve the care of patients living with multimorbidity, barriers to managing multiple chronic conditions and facilitators to navigating complex care scenarios should be explored not only for people beyond working age, but for individuals in their mid-life specifically.

A Qualitative Study on the Perception of Medication Adherence by the Social Circles of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Studies have indicated that half of all patients with diabetes do not take their medication as prescribed. Patient social circles, including professionals (health care providers) and nonprofessionals (family and friends) might contribute to low medication adherence. Therefore, this study explored the point of view of healthcare providers and family members of patients with diabetes on patient medication adherence. Our study included health care providers and family members using in-depth, semi structured interviews. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) was used to explore their perspectives. TDF was used to build a topic guide and to frame the data analysis. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using the MAXQDA 2022 program. The participants identified a variety of factors potentially associated with diabetes medication adherence. Most factors were related to the environmental context and resources such as the burden of polypharmacy, medication shortages, and long wait times for care. In addition, factors related to patient beliefs concerning diabetes complications and insulin injections were reported. Several factors were identified that related to knowledge and social influences. Interventions that target the factors identified by the social circle of patients with diabetes might improve medication adherence and promote better disease management outcomes.

Barriers and Enablers of Screening and Brief Intervention Programme Implementation for Patients with Alcohol-Related Injuries in a South African Trauma Centre: Views of Health Care Providers

Despite high levels of alcohol-related injury in South Africa, there are no screening and brief intervention (SBI) programs in any hospital trauma centres. We conducted semistructured interviews with 16 trauma centre staff (8 doctors, 7 nurses, 1 social worker) focused on barriers and enablers to the future implementation of a SBI program. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Perceived barriers included time constraints and injury treatment as priority, with the central barrier being inadequate funding. Enablers included the support of senior staff, and training. These findings can be used to support the successful implementation of a SBI program in South African trauma centres, with the purpose of reducing high rates of risky alcohol use and related injury recidivism.

EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION

Healthcare providers are formed to serve people and put people’s needs at the center. They are expected to inform their patients as experts in health problems and health risk factors. During the clinical encounter they must integrate their knowledge with the unique characteristics, feelings, needs, and life circumstances of the person seeking their help. While this is the ideal scenario, the pandemic erased this script completely. Everything had to be learned by everyone without an expert guide. What are the risk factors, are mouth masks necessary, should we close schools, borders, or do we apply watchful waiting? How can we define cases, diagnose people, and treat them if they become ill? What do we do with other chronic diseases, health problems, or preventive services? Which resources do we need, including human resources (student trainees, retired healthcare workers, volunteers)? What was the view of healthcare providers on their duty to work during this health emergency? The latter question is answered by Muñoz et al in their paper in this issue of the IJPCM for nursing students in Chile and Spain [1].

Practice patterns and perspectives regarding treatment for symptoms of menopause: qualitative interviews with US health care providers.

To document health care providers' views regarding treatments for symptoms associated with menopause and discussions with patients about symptoms and treatment decisions. Results informed development of a data collection form for a retrospective medical record review (reported separately). Registered US gynecologists or primary care providers from all US regions were identified from local association directories and an in-house database and were invited to participate in a qualitative interview if they consulted with three or more patients per week presenting with menopausal symptoms. Participants provided demographic data, information about patients' symptoms, and health care provider and patient views on prescription and nonprescription therapies. Key concepts/themes from interviews were identified. Participating health care providers (10 gynecologists, 10 primary care providers) agreed there are effective treatment options for menopausal symptoms, particularly vasomotor symptoms and vaginal dryness and/or atrophy. Health care providers reported that treatment was generally dictated by symptoms that interfered with quality of life and/or daily activities, although patients often had symptoms for months before presentation. All health care providers said they prescribe hormone and/or nonhormone therapies for treatment of menopausal symptoms; half stated that they typically inquire about patients' nonprescription therapy use, and 45% recommend specific nonprescription therapies. The most commonly cited barriers to initiation of any therapy for menopausal symptoms were patient concerns about risks and financial considerations (ie, insurance or cost). US health care providers reported prescribing therapies for menopausal symptoms and noted that these therapies were perceived as generally effective; however, barriers to initiation of prescription therapy exist, and new treatment options are needed.

Exploring intersectional stigma and COVID-19 impact on human immunodeficiency virus service provision for African Americans in a Southern city.

Aims/objectivesThrough interviews with clinical service providers, we explored stigma's impact on HIV service provision for African Americans during COVID‐19.BackgroundAfrican Americans experience disproportionate rates of HIV and COVID‐19. We explored COVID‐19's impact on HIV services for African American adults in a Southern city.DesignThe study was qualitative and observational.MethodsKey informant interviews were conducted (n = 11) across two healthcare centres and two community‐based organisations and thematically analysed using phenomenological approaches by two coders. Interviews explored pre‐ and post‐COVID‐19 service provision and parallels between COVID‐19 and HIV, particularly as related to stigma. The COREQ checklist was utilised to ensure research quality.ResultsAccording to the providers interviewed, all providers offered HIV prevention/treatment, but PrEP and preventive services diminished greatly early in the COVID‐19 pandemic. Successful transition to telehealth depended on existing telehealth use. Challenges exacerbated by COVID‐19 included food/housing insecurity and physical distancing constraints. Clients' COVID‐19 informational needs shifted from concerns to vaccine requests over time. Interviewees stated HIV and COVID‐19 both carry ‘risk taking’; however, HIV risk was more physically intimate than COVID‐19. Notably, some providers used stigmatising language referring to clients with HIV/COVID and omitted person‐centred language.ConclusionsFindings suggest need to address challenges in telehealth to improve client experiences now and for future pandemics. More research is needed to examine intersectional stigmatisation of COVID‐19 and HIV for African Americans to design person‐centred counselling interventions.Relevance to Clinical PracticeResults demonstrate need for provider training to reframe stigma discussions using client centeredness, educating African Americans on HIV and COVID‐19 prevention, and coordination with local organisations to address multiple care needs.Patient/Public ContributionThis research highlights needs of clients based on the views of healthcare providers caring for predominantly African American communities in a Southern city. However, no patients, service users, caregivers or members of the public were directly involved in this study.

Health Education about Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors in Gynecological and Obstetric Care: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers' Views in Germany.

Objective: Lifestyle-related risk factors (LRRFs) during pregnancy and lactation are associated with a range of health problems. However, previous studies have shown a large knowledge gap among pregnant women regarding the effects of LRRFs. This study aimed to investigate the role of health education about LRRFs during pregnancy and lactation in gynecological and obstetric care from healthcare providers’ (HCPs) point of view. Methods: To explore the views of healthcare providers, a qualitative study was performed. In 2019, 22 in-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 9 gynecologists and 13 midwives. Participants came from different inpatient and outpatient care settings and from rural, urban, and socially deprived areas in southern Germany. All the interviews were tape-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A combined inductive and deductive approach was applied for data analysis. Results: Interviews with HCPs showed that they were aware of the possible impacts of LRRFs during pregnancy and lactation. They noted the importance of action, specifically among women with low socioeconomic status (SES), migrants, and women with a concerning medical history or other specific needs. However, the interviews showed that, at present, there is no standardized practice of educating patients on LRRFs in routine care. This was attributed to a lack of guidelines and time, unfavorable regulations, and undefined responsibilities. The priority of health education is lower in inpatient healthcare settings as compared to outpatient healthcare settings. HCPs apply a demand-driven healthcare approach, focusing on a woman’s medical history, needs, and personal circumstances. HCPs voiced the importance of implementing pre-conception education across different healthcare settings, garnering support from other health organizations, and setting out clearly defined responsibilities among HCPs. Conclusions: This qualitative study explored HCPs’ perspectives on health education about LRRFs during pregnancy and lactation. The results from this study emphasize the need for a central strategy for health education about LRRFs during pregnancy and lactation in gynecological and obstetric care.

Person-centred care to prevent hospitalisations – a focus group study addressing the views of healthcare providers

BackgroundThe primary healthcare sector comprises various health services, including disease prevention at local level. Research shows that targeted primary healthcare services can prevent the development of acute complications and ultimately reduce the risk of hospitalisations. While interdisciplinary collaboration has been suggested as a means to improve the quality and responsiveness of personal care needs in preventive services, effective implementation remains a challenge. To improve the quality and responsiveness of primary healthcare and to develop initiatives to support the interdisciplinary collaboration in preventive services, there is a need to investigate the views of primary healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to investigate perceptions of preventive care among primary healthcare providers by examining their views on what constitutes a need for hospitalisation, and which strategies are found useful to prevent hospitalisation. Further, to explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be supported with a view to providing person-centred care.MethodsFive focus group interviews were conducted with 27 healthcare providers, including general practitioners, social and healthcare assistants, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, home care nurses, specialist nurses and acute care nurses. Interviews were transcribed, and analysed with qualitative content analysis.ResultsThree categories emerged from the analysis: 1) Mental and social conditions influence physical functioning and hospitalisation need, 2) Well-established primary healthcare services are important to provide person-centred care through interdisciplinary collaboration and 3) Interdisciplinary collaboration in primary healthcare services is predominantly focussed on handling acute physical conditions. These describe that the healthcare providers are attentive towards the influence of mental, social and physical conditions on the risk of hospitalisation, entailing a focus on person-centred care. Nevertheless, in the preventive services, interdisciplinary collaboration focusses primarily on handling acute physical conditions, which constitutes a barrier for interdisciplinary collaboration.ConclusionsBy focusing on the whole person, it could be possible to provide more person-centred care through interdisciplinary collaboration and ultimately to prevent some hospitalisations. Stakeholders at all levels should be informed about the relevance of considering mental, social and physical conditions to improve the quality and responsiveness of primary healthcare services and to develop initiatives to support interdisciplinary collaboration.