The years 1926 to 1937 were years offurther great change, both politically and legally. The Egyptian and British governments drew much closer to agreement on regulating the relationship between them, and after detailed discussions between the two countries a Treaty of Perpetual Alliance was signed in 1936.1 At the same time rising nationalist feeling demanded less foreign involvement in Egyptian domestic affairs, and it became clear that the whole legal structure needed further reform to abolish the remaining consular jurisdiction. There were also growing demands that the Mixed Courts be reformed, or absorbed into a unified structure. It was of course this latter plan that had been so vigorously opposed by the Mixed Court's Bar and states such as France when proposed by Great Britain in earlier years. Nevertheless, reform was gradually accepted as inevitable, although even the possibility of lessening influence or absorption into a larger organisation could not dampen the celebrations held in Egypt in 1926 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the first l9Sixed Court cases. Against this baclrground this article deals with several topics. The first is The Mixed Courts and Foreigners, which provides a legal context for the many changes in the Mediterranean area in the 1920s and 1930s. Next is The Mixed Courts and Government Immunity, with more examples of the policy of the courts, including the controversial Egyptian Tribute Affair, and then The Salem Claim, an event which dragged the Muxed Courts unwillingly into an international arbitratiorl between the USA and Egypt. In fact the Mixed Courts came out of the affair wel1, although the battle was more political ffian legal in the end. This leads to The Mixed Courts and Internal Conflict of Laws, and The Mixed Courts and Companies. A brief view of Taxation precedes a discussion on The Treaty of Alliance and Friendship with Great Britain, and The Montreux Conveniion. Finally, General Jurisprudence, and A View from Other Courts conclude this article.