Video Metrics Research Articles

Traffic as an Urban Health Determinant: Coverage of the New York City Congestion Pricing Plan on TikTok.

Social listening can provide deeper insight into public sentiment regarding policy proposals, as seen with the congestion pricing initiative in New York City (NYC). The purpose of this study was to assess the content of a sample of TikTok videos related to congestion pricing in NYC. A total of 100 unique videos were extracted from the hashtag #nyccongestionpricing on TikTok and coded for the presence of the following information based on four different areas of focus: video metrics, details about pricing plan, effects of pricing plan, and user-related issues. In total, the 100-video sample received 17,375,818 views, 1,285,610 likes, 89,883 favorites, and 100,634 comments. Only 3 of the 25 content characteristics were present in a majority (> 50) of the videos. These were mentions location (below 60th street of Manhattan) (N = 65), mentions cost (N = 61), and mentions cons of pricing (N = 56). Mentioning location had a significant effect on the views (p = 0.0163) and likes (p = 0.0225) a video received. Mentioning cost had a statistical impact on the views (p = 0.0098), likes (p = 0.0128), favorites (p = 0.0128), and comments (p = 0.0030) that the video received. Mentioning the MTA and benefits of the congestion plan significantly lowered metrics of engagement. Themes that emerged were personal, often negative and tended to focus more on cost to citizens and location, despite the evidence of negative public health impacts. This research can be used as a springboard for future research that examines social listening at the intersection of public health and policy.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information about Dementia Care

Aim: Digital platforms such as YouTube are popular sources of health-related information. Although there are studies evaluating the quality of different online medical content, studies focusing on the quality of dementia-related content are limited. This study aimed to investigate the quality of YouTube videos related to dementia patient care. Material and Methods: Using the term "Dementia care" on the YouTube platform, 100 English videos that met the inclusion criteria were identified and analyzed. In addition to video popularity measurements, to evaluate content quality, the global quality scale (GQS), modified DISCERN scale, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) quality scale, and the patient education materials assessment tool for audio/visual materials (PEMAT-A/V) are used. Results: It was observed that most of the videos were uploaded by non-academic health institutions (36%) and health professionals (23%). When the content of the videos was evaluated, it was determined that general care strategies were the most common content with 52%. Scores indicating high levels of reliability and accuracy were determined on all applied content quality scales. Videos sourced from academic healthcare institutions were found to have the highest scores on content quality scales. In correlation analyses, video metrics such as duration, view ratio, number of comments, and video power index values were positively correlated with content quality scores. Conclusion: Videos about dementia patient care on YouTube generally exhibit high popularity and content quality. Individuals seeking information about dementia care on online platforms should be directed to videos uploaded by healthcare institutions.

Evaluating the Distribution, Quality, and Educational Value of Videos Related to Knee Instability Exercises on the Social Media Platform TikTok.

Introduction TikTok, a globally popular short-form video platform, offers a unique space for healthcare professionals to share advice, particularly under common conditions such as knee pain or instability. Despite its popularity, doubts persist regarding the reliability of medical information disseminated on TikTok. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of TikTok videos as a source of patient information on knee instability, recognizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of potential misinformation on this influential social media platform. Methods A search for "knee stability exercises" on TikTok yielded 448 videos, of which 187 met the inclusion criteria. These videos were categorized by source and evaluated using the Knee Exercise Education Scoring Tool (KEEST) and an information analysis questionnaire, DISCERN. Results General user videos (69.84%) had notably lower DISCERN scores than healthcare professional videos (29.1%) across all categories (P < 0.001, P = 0.282, P = 0.131, and P = 0.010). The DISCERN scores were inversely linked to video metrics (views, likes, comments, favorites, and shares). General user videos were largely of poor quality (66.4%), whereas healthcare professional videos spanned poor (61.8%), fair (28.2%), good (9.1%), and excellent (1.8%) categories. Both general users (12.31/25) and healthcare professionals (12.18/25) exhibited average quality according to KEEST standards (P = 0.809), with an intriguing inverse correlation between video popularity and DISCERN score. Conclusion Healthcare professionals demonstrated superior evidence-based content (DISCERN), whereas both groups were comparatively educated on treatment plans and effects (KEEST). TikTok's prevalent knee instability videos lack quality, proper sourcing, treatment risk information, and explanation. Moreover, popularity is inversely correlated with quality, and healthcare professionals appear to offer better evidence-based content. TikTok's role in healthcare highlights the importance of ensuring accurate information and implementing content quality regulations.

A Study on Video Thumbnails Design Attributes and Their Influence to the Outcome of the Video

In the evolving landscape of user-generated content (UGC) platforms, where videos have become a preferred mode of entertainment and information consumption, the importance of thumbnails in attracting viewers cannot be overstated. This study delves into the intricate relationship between thumbnail design and video success, focusing on the Chinese UGC platform RED. Specifically, the research examines the thumbnails of @Amber Lulu, a vlogger with a consistent style of video and thumbnails. Analyzing a data sample of 30 videos within the "day in my life vlog" category, the study categorizes thumbnails based on three design elements: emphasis on one person vs. a group, two lines of title vs. one line, and a close vs. far background. The results reveal significant correlations between thumbnail design and video metrics, notably emphasizing the positive impact of a distant background, an emphasis on one person, and the use of two lines of heading. Drawing from communication theories such as visual hierarchy, cognitive load theory, and the effect of image characteristics, the study provides valuable insights for content creators seeking to optimize their thumbnails for increased engagement. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the role thumbnails play in viewer engagement on UGC platforms, offering practical advice for content creators to design more visually appealing thumbnails for their videos.

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren’s Contracture

This study seeks to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on Dupuytren's contracture. The first 50 unique videos on Dupuytren's contracture were evaluated by searching YouTube for Dupuytren's contracture. Video metrics, source, and content type were recorded. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria. Video educational quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a Dupuytren's Contracture-Specific Score (DC-SS). The total number of views for all 50 videos evaluated was 1,908,608 (mean, 38,172.16 ± 5,502.45 views). The mean reliability (JAMA) score was 2.21 ± 0.69 (range 0-4), the mean educational quality (GQS)score was 2.80 ± 1.28 (range 1-5), and the mean disease-specific (DC-SS) score was 6.05 ± 2.17 (range 0-15). Nonphysician health care professionals had the most popular videos, but the lowest DC-SS. GQS varied based on the video source, with physician-uploaded videos having the highest average quality scores. Physician source was an independent positive predictor of higher quality (GQS) (β= 0.477). Videos on Dupuytren's contracture were frequently viewed on YouTube but had overall low educational quality and reliability. Of the videos that discussed collagenase as a treatment option, 40% failed to mention percutaneous needle aponeurotomy. Patients may be exposed to an incomplete set of treatment options. Educational content on YouTube should be interpreted cautiously and proper in-office education and high-quality resources for Dupuytren's contracture should be provided by physicians. Therapeutic IV.

"Self-care selfies": Patient-uploaded videos capture meaningful changes in dexterity over 6 months.

Upper extremity function reflects disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). This study evaluated the feasibility, validity, and sensitivity to change of remote dexterity assessments applying human pose estimation to patient-uploaded videos. A discovery cohort of 50 adults with MS recorded "selfie" videos of self-care tasks at home: buttoning, brushing teeth, and eating. Kinematic data were extracted using MediaPipe Hand pose estimation software. Clinical comparison tests were grip and pinch strength, 9 hole peg test (9HPT), and vibration, and patient-reported dexterity assessments (ABILHAND). Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated (Health-ITUES framework). A validation cohort (N = 35) completed 9HPT and videos. The modality was feasible: 88% of the 50 enrolled participants uploaded ≥3 videos, and 74% completed the study. It was also usable: assessments easy to access (95%), platform easy to use (97%), and tasks representative of daily activities (86%). The buttoning task revealed four metrics with strong correlations with 9HPT (nondominant: r = 0.60-0.69, dominant: r = 0.51-0.57, P < 0.05) and ABILHAND (r = -0.48, P = 0.05). Retest validity at 1 week was stable (r > 0.8). Cross-sectional correlations between video metrics and 9HPT were similar at 6 months, and in the validation cohort (nondominant: r = 0.46, dominant: r = 0.45, P < 0.05). Over 6 months, pinch strength (5.8-5.0 kg/cm2 , P = 0.05) and self-reported pinch (ABILHAND) decreased marginally. While only 15% of participants worsened by 20% on 9HPT, 70% worsened in key buttoning video metrics. Patient-uploaded videos represent a novel, patient-centered modality for capturing dexterity that appears valid and sensitive to change, enhancing its potential to be disseminated for neurological disease monitoring and treatment.

Making Science Education More Accessible: A Case Study of TikTok's Utility as a Science Communication Tool.

Social media has revolutionized science communication, allowing for rapid dissemination of science-related content to the public. In recent years, video platforms like TikTok and Instagram have implemented recommendation algorithms that track users' interests andsuggest personalized videos. As a result, these apps have become powerful tools for public messaging, facilitating access to audiences that are naturally curious about science. In 2020 I began uploading educational science videos to TikTok which have collectively accumulated more than 48 million views and 8 million "likes." Here I present an analysis of video metrics collected from the TikTok app for a random sampling of 150 videos, searching for factors that predict the number of views a video receives and the level of viewer engagement. Videos with higher view counts were liked and shared at higher rates and sustained viewer attention for longer. Properties like hashtags, sounds, and effects did not significantly influence video views. Interestingly, videos summarizing research papers received the highest levels of engagement, potentially reflecting high demand from lay audiences who are traditionally unable to access scientific literature. Finally, I present survey data demonstrating that 84% of users report feeling more trustful of science & scientists after following this account. Although the generalizability of these findings is limited, the results offer insights into the factors that drive video performance on TikTok and how users engage with scientific content on social media. These findings may help science communicators more effectively reach wider audiences and promote science literacy in new and innovative ways.

Design, Simulation, and Performance Evaluation of Reactive and Proactive Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols

The primary goal of this study is to investigate and evaluate the performance of wireless Ad-Hoc routing protocols using the OPNET simulation tool, as well as to recommend the most effective routing strategies for the wireless mesh environment. Investigations have been testified to analyze the performance of the reactive and proactive Ad-Hoc routing protocols in different scenarios. Application and wireless metrics were configured that were used to test and evaluate the performance of routing protocols. The application metric includes web browsing metrics such as HTTP page response time, voice and video metrics such as end-to-end delay, and delay variation. The wireless network metrics include wireless media access delay, data dropped, wireless load, wireless retransmission attempts, and Packet Delivery Ratio. The simulation results show that the AODV overcome DSR and OLSR in terms of PDR (76%), wireless load (22.692 Mbps), voice delay variation (102.685 ms), HTTP page response time (15.317 sec), voice and video packet end-to-end delay (206.527 and 25.294 ms), wireless media access delay (90.150 ms), data dropped (10.003 Mbps), wireless load (22.692 Mbps), and wireless retransmission attempts (0.392 packets).

Are YouTube videos claiming to describe lumbar spinal manipulation techniques adequate?

ABSTRACT Background and objective YouTube has become a digital visual library in almost all fields of life, including medicine. Healthcare professionals and students frequently use YouTube to gain new skills and knowledge; however, the content of these videos has not been scientifically evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the descriptive adequacy and quality of YouTube videos on lumbar spine manipulation techniques (LSMTs) prepared by different healthcare professionals. Methods The first 50 most relevant videos retrieved on searching YouTube for the keyword ‘lumbar spinal manipulation techniques’ were included in the study. The video metrics (total duration, number of views, time since upload, number of comments, number of likes, and number of dislikes) that could be accessed from video descriptions were recorded. However the videos were scored according to manipulation definition criteria proposed by the American Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT manipulation description score – AAOMPT-MDS) and benchmark criteria for quality of digital content by the Journal of American Medical Association’s (JAMA). The video metrics, AAOMPT-MDS and JAMA scores of the videos prepared by medical doctors, chiropractors, osteopaths, and physiotherapists were compared. Results Video metrics of groups were similar. The mean AAOMPT-MDS of the videos was 2.40 ± 1.57 out of 6.00 (higher score was better), and the mean JAMA score was 2.14 ± 1.05 out of 4.00 (higher score was better). Videos created by all professional groups had statistically comparable AAOMPT-MDS and JAMA scores (p > 0.05). Conclusion Although YouTube videos on LSMTs offer valuable information for professionals and students, creators should follow the proposed recommendations when producing these videos to ensure quality content and systematic presentation.

Are There Video Characteristics That Improve the Accuracy and Quality of Ob-Gyn Procedural Videos? [ID: 1376966

INTRODUCTION: YouTube has emerged as a common resource used by ob-gyn residents to learn procedural skills. There has not been any research conducted that examines the relationship between video characteristics and the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. The purpose of this study was to assess whether YouTube video metrics, including number of likes, views, channel subscribers, geographic location, and organizational affiliations, can be used to gauge the quality and accuracy of ob-gyn procedural videos. METHODS: Using American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) surgical curriculum topics, we conducted a search query into YouTube and sorted by relevance. Screening criteria were used to exclude videos. We then recorded video characteristics and scored the videos using the Laparoscopic Surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool for quality. Additionally, we scored videos for accuracy by comparing them to the ACOG Surgical Curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SCOG) checklist. RESULTS: Of the 306 videos analyzed, number of likes, views, channel subscribers, and geographic location were not of high quality with LAP-VEGaS scores less than 11. The number of likes, views, and channel subscribers were not significantly associated with LAP-VEGaS or SCOG accuracy. There was a significant difference in LAP-VEGaS score and SCOG accuracy with international health care organization/specialty society with P values of .004 and .001, respectively. CONCLUSION: Of the characteristics studied, number of likes, views, and channel subscribers, and geographic location did not have a statistically significant difference in accuracy of educational value. Only association with international health care organizations/specialty societies was significantly associated with an increased LAP-VEGaS, indicating increased quality of video and increased percent accuracy by ACOG standards.

Longitudinal analysis of YouTube videos discussing post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

YouTube is heavily utilized by patients as an educational resource, but this content can be fraught with misinformation. We sought to characterize the quality of videos on YouTube discussing postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction and to evaluate metrics associated with retaining a top position in search results over time. In October 2019, we watched the first 100 YouTube videos using the search query "radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction." Videos not relevant to the topic were excluded. Video metrics were collected, and content quality was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument. In June 2022, the search was repeated and video metrics were updated. Video characteristics were associated with search rank and the ability to remain in the top 100 spots using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and logistic regression, respectively. We included 81 videos which amassed 529,428 views in 2019. The median total DISCERN score was 29 (IQR 21-42), which is interpreted as a poor quality video. Self-promotion or commercial bias was present in 42 videos (51.9%); false claims were present in 16 (19.8%). There was no correlation between DISCERN score and search rank (r = 0.08, p = 0.49). In 2022, 15 videos remained in the top 100 search results and had a higher median DISCERN score than videos no longer in the top 100 (46 vs. 28.5, p = 0.01). Each additional DISCERN point was associated with a 7% higher odds of remaining in the top 100 (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, p = 0.003). The quality of the top 100 YouTube videos discussing postprostatectomy erectile dysfunction is low. Higher quality videos had a higher odds of remaining in the top 100 search results over time but do not correlate with the order in which they are ranked.

Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients.

This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: "facelift surgery," "facelift surgery what to expect," "facelift surgery patient education," and "what is facelift surgery." Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P < .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.

Evaluating YouTube videos on sialendoscopy as an educational resource for patients.

Patients are increasingly relying on YouTube for health information. We objectively evaluated the quality and comprehensiveness of sialendoscopy YouTube videos available to patients. We further investigated the relationship between video content and video popularity. We identified 150 videos using the search term "sialendoscopy." Videos were excluded if they were lectures for medical professionals, operating room (OR) recordings, unrelated, non-English, or non-audio. Video quality and comprehensiveness were evaluated using modified DISCERN criterion (range: 5-25) and novel sialendoscopy criterion (NSC, range: 0-7), respectively. Secondary outcomes included standard video metrics and Video Power Index to measure popularity. Videos were classified binarily by uploader type as from an academic medical center or from other sources. Twenty-two (14.7%) of 150 videos were included for review, with 7 (31.8%) uploaded from academic medical institutions. One hundred-nine (72.7%) videos were excluded as lectures for medical professionals or OR recordings. Overall mean modified DISCERN (13.45 ± 3.42) and NSC (3.05 ± 0.96) scores were low; however, videos uploaded by academic medical institutions were significantly more comprehensive (NSC mean difference=0.98, 95% CI: 0.16-1.80, p=.02). There were no significant correlations between video popularity and objective measures of quality or comprehensiveness. This study highlights the paucity and low quality of sialendoscopy videos for patients. More popular videos are not higher quality, and most videos are targeted more toward physicians rather than patients. As YouTube becomes increasingly used by patients, there is opportunity for otolaryngologists to produce more informative videos for patients while implementing targeted strategies to increase viewership. NA.

Evaluating the educational quality of surgical YouTube® videos: A systematic review

• The educational quality of surgical training videos on YouTube® videos are subpar • Video metrics are not directly related to the educational value of YouTube® videos • Standardized validated tools to assess the educational utility of YouTube® videos are necessary : YouTube® is the preferred source of junior trainees to prepare for surgeries. However, its educational utility is not yet determined. The objectives of this review are to assess the educational quality of YouTube® videos and to evaluate their quality and utility to complement surgical training. : MEDLINE was searched for relevant articles which were screened by two independent reviewers using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. : Of 261 articles retrieved, 29 were included of which 96.6% reported unsatisfactory educational quality. Scarcity in standardized validated methods to assess the educational utility of YouTube® videos was identified. Video metrics (e.g., likes, views) do not necessarily correlate with the educational value of YouTube® videos. : The educational quality of surgical YouTube® videos is inadequate, insufficient and heterogenous primarily due to its public nature. Developing a peer review process would improve the quality of uploaded videos. Moreover, academic entities should promote the development of high-quality content on open access platforms.

Gender Inequity in Entrepreneurship: Understanding Barriers, Boundary Conditions, and Opportunities

Achieving gender equity in entrepreneurship is a pressing societal concern. A growing number of studies have provided consistent evidence for gender disparities and barriers for female entrepreneurs. Yet, research also suggests that under certain conditions, tied to the unique features of the entrepreneurship context, there may also be a female advantage in venture evaluations and funding outcomes. In this symposium, we hone in on this burgeoning line of inquiry by bringing together four presentations that investigate when and why a female (dis)advantage emerges, and how certain features of this context help to mitigate gender bias. Based on a diverse array of methods (archival, experimental, and video metrics) and samples (angel investors, accelerators, and cofounders), the presentations highlight novel mechanisms underlying gender bias in entrepreneurship settings. Overall, this symposium aims to 1) offer actionable insights for recognizing and addressing gender bias in entrepreneurship and 2) identify new directions for gender research more broadly. Women Entrepreneurs Don’t Ask (For Enough) in the Entrepreneurial Negotiation Process? Presenter: Anyi Ma; Tulane U. The Effects of Masculinity Displays by Female Entrepreneurs on Venture Evaluation Presenter: Soojin Oh; Pennsylvania State U. Presenter: Aparna Joshi; Penn State Smeal College of Business How the Functional Titles of Male and Female Cofounders Affect Funding in Mixed-Gender Founding Team Presenter: Steven Gray; U. of Texas at Austin Presenter: Melanie Milovac; INSEAD “Gender Diversity Matching” Helps Ventures Raise Funding: Evidence from a Natural Experiment Presenter: Dana Kanze; London Business School Presenter: Alessandro Piazza; Rice U.

YouTube is a poor-quality source for patient information on the rehabilitation following total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite the ubiquity of health information on YouTube, the quality of the information as it pertains to total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) rehabilitation is unknown. The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of information available on YouTube as it pertains to rehabilitation following TSA, including anatomic and reverse TSA. MethodsUtilizing predefined search terms, 480 videos regarding rehabilitation following TSA were screened for study inclusion. A total of 143 videos were included in the final analysis. Of these, 99 (69.2%) videos were on rehabilitation of anatomical TSA and 44 (30.8%) videos reported on rehabilitation after reverse TSA. Each video was reviewed using 3 scoring systems: (1) Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, (2) Global Quality Score (GQS), and (3) DISCERN instrument. ResultsYouTube videos regarding TSA are of suboptimal educational quality with a mean JAMA score of 2.5 ± 0.7, mean GQS of 2.7 ± 0.9, and mean DISCERN score of 33.2 ± 5.5 overall. Upon evaluation of video metrics based on classification it was found that educational nonphysician videos had significantly more likes than all other categories (P = .01). Educational physician videos were found to be significantly longer than all other categories (educational physician: 10.0 ± 14.8 minutes, educational nonphysician: 6.2 ± 3.2 minutes, personal testimony: 3.5 ± 2.6 minutes, commercial: 5.8 ± 5.4 minutes; P < .01) and had significantly higher JAMA (P < .01), GQS (P < .01), and DISCERN (P < .01). ConclusionYouTube videos are a poor source of educational information for patients regarding TSA rehabilitation. Educational videos prepared by nonphysicians accrued more likes than other video categories. Although educational videos by physicians provided statistically higher quality educational content as noted by JAMA, GQS, and DISCREN scores, the average scores across all author categories were classified as low (JAMA), moderate to poor (GQS), or poor (DISCERN) quality educational content. Additionally, our findings suggest that physician educational videos that are shorter in duration are more likely to be well received and watched to completion by viewers compared to longer videos. Patients should be provided trusted resources to learn more about TSAs.

MP02-06 URINARY TRACT INFECTION ON SOCIAL MEDIA: EXAMINING YOUTUBE CONTENT AS A SOURCE OF PATIENT EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP02-06 URINARY TRACT INFECTION ON SOCIAL MEDIA: EXAMINING YOUTUBE CONTENT AS A SOURCE OF PATIENT EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION Zhenyue Huang, Rosen Jeong, Edwin Lee, Heng Ruan, Tal Meir Cohen, and Jason Kim Zhenyue HuangZhenyue Huang More articles by this author , Rosen JeongRosen Jeong More articles by this author , Edwin LeeEdwin Lee More articles by this author , Heng RuanHeng Ruan More articles by this author , Tal Meir CohenTal Meir Cohen More articles by this author , and Jason KimJason Kim More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002514.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent, affecting 50-80% of women with up to 44% percent of those women suffering from recurrent UTI. The rising presence of social media has offered a wide array of publicly available medical information. We sought to investigate the quality of information for UTI on YouTube. METHODS: A YouTube search was performed using the keyword ‘urinary tract infection’ and the top 200 viewed videos were analyzed. The videos were analyzed by four reviewers for video metrics, user engagement, and content through DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) scores. Exclusion criteria included videos that exceeded twenty minutes in duration, were non-English, duplicated, unrelated, or were presentations for medical professionals. RESULTS: A total of 54 videos met inclusion criteria with a total of 12,772,587 views. The average video length was 5 (SD 3.6) minutes. Fifty-two percent (n=28) of videos were produced by non-medical institutions. Forty-two percent of videos (n=23) featured a physician with only 11% (n=6) featuring a urologist. Median DISCERN quality score was 3 (1-5) with 67% rated as moderate to poor quality (DISCERN ≤ 3). Videos featuring a physician had a higher DISCERN quality score than those that did not (4 vs 3, p=0.021). The median PEMAT understandability and actionability scores were 91 (28-100) and 67 (0-100) respectively. Sixty-nine percent (n=37) of videos promoted home remedies and supplements for treatment and prevention of UTIs. Vaginal estrogen therapy was mentioned in seven percent (n=4) of videos as a preventive treatment for UTIs. Thirty-three percent (n=18) of videos contained potentially misleading information with a total of 4,130,906 views. CONCLUSIONS: One third of the most popular videos on YouTube discussing UTIs presented misleading information and less than a quarter of the videos featured a urologist. Interestingly, over two thirds of the videos promoted home remedies for treatment and prevention of UTIs. With the ever-growing role of social media in contemporary society, a stronger physician presence on YouTube and other social media platforms can help deliver accurate and accessible information to the public. Source of Funding: N/a © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e12 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Zhenyue Huang More articles by this author Rosen Jeong More articles by this author Edwin Lee More articles by this author Heng Ruan More articles by this author Tal Meir Cohen More articles by this author Jason Kim More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

See many, do one, teach many more: Assessing quality and reliability of publicly available endoscopic videos in rhinology.

The use of video recording is commonplace in rhinology given the increased use of endoscopes when evaluating patients in the office and the operating room and for its educational potential. This study aimed to determine the quality of publicly available endoscopic videos in rhinology. A video search was performed on YouTube in April 2020 and included all videos since its inception in 2005 using terms related to rhinology found in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Case Log Coding Guide. Videos which met inclusion criteria were evaluated for video metrics and quality using validated scoring systems: Video Power Index (VPI), modified Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, modified global quality score (GQS), and modified DISCERN criteria. A total of 138 videos were evaluated, 114 of which were uploaded independently, and 24 videos were uploaded by an academic institution. Academic-affiliated videos have higher like ratio at 91.7 ± 7.55% compared with 86.27 ± 17.44% (p=0.018). Academic-affiliated videos have higher JAMA benchmark scores, DISCERN criteria scores, and GQS values (1.71 ± 0.55 vs. 1.66 ± 0.49 [p=0.66]), (3.33 ± 0.56 vs. 2.85 ± 0.65 [p<0.001]), (4.38 ± 0.81 vs. 3.43 ± 1.01 [p<0.001])], respectively. There was no significant difference in VPI (p=0.73). Endoscopic videos are rapidly growing in prominence and remain an important part of surgical education, but overall are heterogeneous in quality and reliability, necessitating an effort to establish both video sharing regulations and objective standards of quality.

Getting high for likes: Exploring cannabis-related content on TikTok.

With over 1 billion monthly users globally, a third of whom are under 14 years, TikTok's popularity is indisputable. Publicly available cannabis-related content on this platform may influence perceptions of cannabis use. We aimed to examine how cannabis-related videos are portrayed on TikTok. Data were collected from TikTok using hashtag-based keywords on cannabis-related videos (n=1377). Seven researchers documented video metrics (i.e. views, likes, comments) and independently coded videos for sentiment and theme. After removing duplicates and non-related content, the final sample contained 881 videos. These videos had a median view count of 518 700 (SD=±1 082 905), median likes count of 99 900 (SD=±206 647) and median comment count of 931 (SD=±2977). Many videos portrayed cannabis use positively (54.14%; collectively viewed 417 million times), with 15.84% of this subset actively depicting cannabis or administration products. The thematic analysis identified seven non-mutually exclusive themes. Content portraying cannabis use as entertaining or humorous accounted for 71.74% of videos, with a further 42.90% discussing personal cannabis use experiences and 24.63% promoting the social and cultural acceptability of cannabis use. Our sample revealed over half of videos portrayed cannabis use positively and none were age restricted. All were publicly accessible through standard web and smartphone applications. With previous research demonstrating that exposure to cannabis-related content can influence adolescents' attitudes and problematic cannabis use, it is important more effective age restrictions and regulations are introduced to social media platforms.

A comparison of patient testimonials on YouTube of the most common orthodontic treatment modalities: Braces, in-office aligners, and direct-to-consumer aligners

The aims of this study were to (1) investigate and compare the educational value of the most popular YouTube (www.youtube.com; Google, San Bruno, Calif) orthodontic patient testimonials between braces, in-office aligners (IOA), and direct-to-consumer aligners (DTCA), and (2) classify the emotional response of the viewers through sentiment analysis of the video comments. Three different phrases relevant to braces, IOA, and DTCA were searched on YouTube. The 20 most popular patient testimonial videos meeting the criteria for each group were selected for a total of 60 videos. Using the YouTube application program interface for each video, 13 video metrics were extracted. An information completeness score was assigned, and the video comments were analyzed using sentiment analysis software. The 60 videos included were viewed 34.4 million times by internet users. Braces videos had significantly more likes, comments, and a higher viewer interaction score than the IOA and DTCA videos. IOA videos had a higher median information completeness score than braces and DTCA videos. Of the 5149 video comments with polarity, 53.6% were positive, and 46.4% were negative (P<0.0001). There was no significant association between the treatment modality and positive or negative comments (P= 0.5679). There is high user engagement on YouTube with orthodontic patient testimonials. YouTube users interact with braces patient testimonials the most. YouTube viewers' comments on orthodontic patient testimonials express more positive sentiment than negative sentiment. There was no significant difference in positive and negative sentiment between the video comments for the 3 different treatment modalities.