The authors should be congratulated for synthesizing the results of an interesting experimental investigation on the passive earth pressure on retaining walls. The authors have used these experimental results as a guide in developing design procedures. In their tests, the authors have adopted a sand placing technique, namely by placing the sand in thin layers and then applying surface compaction on each layer to achieve the required unit weight and angle of shearing resistance of the sand. It is evident that the application of vibratory densification produces an overconsolidation effect in the sand mass. Depending on the level of energy transferred to a given layer, the in situ stress level in the said layer will increase. The energy transferred depends on the thickness of the placed sand layer, compaction effort applied on the surface of each layer, compaction duration, and the order of the respective layer ~the energy input for a lower layer is the total of the energy applied to the said layer plus the energy transferred to this layer during compaction of the subsequent layers!. The energy transferred to a given layer reflects on the in situ stress level and accordingly, the value of the overconsolidated ratio ~OCR! of the said layer ~Hanna and Ghaly 1990; Hanna and Soliman-Saad 2001!. The OCR has a direct and significant effect on the coefficients of earth pressure ~Hanna and Soliman-Saad 2001; Bellotti 1976; Feda 1984; Brooker and Ireland 1965!. The authors have treated the produced sand beds in the laboratory as if they were normally consolidated; i.e., the case of OCR51. The authors have reported that the experimental test results agreed well with both Coulomb and Terzaghi theories for the case of loose sand, while a wide disagreement was noted for the case of dense sand ~using the peak angle of shearing resistance of the sand!. In treating this problem, the authors have proposed to adopt the residual-internal angle of friction of the sand, instead of the peak angle of shearing resistance. As expected, by reducing the angle of shearing resistance to the residual value ~which is equivalent to the ultimate value for the case of loose sand! agreement will be achieved with Coulomb and Terzaghi theories. In implementing such assumption the authors have allowed a wall movement of about 10–20% of the height of the wall for medium to dense sand respectively. Such high wall displacement may not be allowed in statically indetermined structures such as bridges. Furthermore, beyond the peak angle of shearing resistance, f, the inter-particles stresses will be the dismantled due the dilation ~Hanna 2001!. Thus, the in situ stress level will be reduced and accordingly the OCR will reach the value for normally consolidated sand (OCR51). This procedure suggests that sands at all