Veterans Health Administration Programs Research Articles

Opportunities to Address Specialty Care Deserts and the Digital Divide through the Veterans Health Administration's Telehealth Hub-and-Spoke Cardiology Clinic: Retrospective Cohort Study.

To address geographic barriers to specialty care access for services such as cardiology, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has implemented a novel, regionalized telehealth care hub. The Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) model extends care, including cardiology services, to individuals in low-access communities across the region. Little is known, however, about the reach of such programs. This study aimed to describe the initial CRH program implementation in terms of growth in users and clinical encounters, as well as the association between user characteristics and the use of CRH cardiology care, in VA's Sierra Pacific region (Northern California, Nevada, and the Pacific Islands). We compared patients who used CRH cardiology services (CRH users) to those using non-CRH cardiology services (CRH nonusers) in the Sierra Pacific region between July 15, 2021, and March 31, 2023. After characterizing changes in the numbers of CRH users and nonusers and clinical encounters over the study period, we used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the association between patient-level factors and the odds of being a CRH user. There were 804 CRH users over the study period, with 1961 CRH encounters concentrated at 3 main CRH sites. The CRH program comprised a minority of cardiology users and encounters in the region, with 19,583 CRH nonusers with 83,489 encounters. The numbers of CRH patients and encounters both increased at a steady-to-increasing rate over the study period, with increases of 37% (n=292 vs n=213) in users and 64% (n=584 vs n=356) in encounters in the first quarter of 2023 compared with the last quarter of 2022. Among CRH users, 8.3% (67/804) were female and 41.4% (333/804) were aged ≥75 years, compared with 4.3% (840/19,583) and 49% (9600/19,583), respectively, among CRH nonusers. The proportions of rural (users: 205/804, 25.5%; nonusers: 4936/19,583, 25.2%), highly disabled (users: 387/804, 48.1%; nonusers: 9246/19,583, 47.2%), and low-income (users: 165/804, 20.5%; nonusers: 3941/19,583, 20.1%) veterans in both groups were similar. In multivariable logistic models, adjusted odds ratios of using CRH were higher for female veterans (1.70, 95% CI 1.29-2.24) and lower for older veterans (aged ≥75 years; 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47). Rural veterans also had a higher adjusted odds ratio of using CRH (1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.42; P=.046). The VA's Sierra Pacific CRH cardiology program grew substantially in its first 2 years of operation, serving disproportionately more female and rural veterans and similar proportions of highly disabled and low-income veterans compared to conventional VA care. This model appears to be effective for overcoming specialty care access barriers for certain individuals, although targeted efforts may be required to reach older veterans. While this study focuses on a single region, specialty, and health care system, lessons from implementing regionalized telehealth hub models may be applicable to other settings.

Diffusion of excellence: evaluating a system to identify, replicate, and spread promising innovative practices across the Veterans health administration.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Diffusion of Excellence (DoE) program provides a system to identify, replicate, and spread promising practices across the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. DoE identifies innovations that have been successfully implemented in the VHA through a Shark Tank style competition. VHA facility and regional directors bid resources needed to replicate promising practices. Winning facilities/regions receive external facilitation to aid in replication/implementation over the course of a year. DoE staff then support diffusion of successful practices across the nationwide VHA. Organized around the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework, we summarize results of an ongoing long-term mixed-methods implementation evaluation of DoE. Data sources include: Shark Tank application and bid details, tracking practice adoptions through a Diffusion Marketplace, characteristics of VHA facilities, focus groups with Shark Tank bidders, structured observations of DoE events, surveys of DoE program participants, and semi-structured interviews of national VHA program office leaders, VHA healthcare system/facility executives, practice developers, implementation teams and facilitators. In the first eight Shark Tanks (2016-2022), 3,280 Shark Tank applications were submitted; 88 were designated DoE Promising Practices (i.e., practices receive facilitated replication). DoE has effectively spread practices across the VHA, with 1,440 documented instances of adoption/replication of practices across the VHA. This includes 180 adoptions/replications in facilities located in rural areas. Leadership decisions to adopt innovations are often based on big picture considerations such as constituency support and linkage to organizational goals. DoE Promising Practices that have the greatest national spread have been successfully replicated at new sites during the facilitated replication process, have close partnerships with VHA national program offices, and tend to be less expensive to implement. Two indicators of sustainment indicate that 56 of the 88 Promising Practices are still being diffused across the VHA; 56% of facilities originally replicating the practices have sustained them, even up to 6 years after the first Shark Tank. DoE has developed a sustainable process for the identification, replication, and spread of promising practices as part of a learning health system committed to providing equitable access to high quality care.

ENHANCING CARE FOR OLDER VETERANS WITH COMPLEX PHYSICAL, COGNITIVE, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL COMORBIDITIES

Abstract Older veterans present in healthcare settings with more diagnoses than younger veterans and non-veteran older adults. Older veterans are also more likely to present with co-occurring physical, cognitive, and psychological conditions that are difficult to assess and treat. This is further complicated by the fact that many older veterans reside in rural areas without easy access to specialty care and, even in non-rural settings, there is a dire shortage of providers with geriatric expertise both within and outside of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. The current symposium highlights promising findings from a variety of VHA programs aimed at enhancing the quality and reach of care provided to older veterans with complex needs. First, Dr. Bamonti will present mixed-methods results from her work in the development of Step-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, a novel virtual intervention for older veterans with COPD. Second, Ms. Carlson will describe program evaluation outcomes from a project aimed at expanding geriatric mental health services via telehealth to older veterans with complex needs residing in rural areas. Third, Dr. Peeples will discuss factors affecting the implementation of the VA Behavioral Recovery Outreach Team model, which is aimed at facilitating successful discharge from inpatient settings and preventing rehospitalization for older veterans. Finally, Dr. Gregg will describe qualitative findings examining a component of the Geriatric Scholars Program for Psychologists, a national post-licensure training program for psychologists treating older rural veterans with complex needs. Dr. Karel, National Director of VHA Geriatric Mental Health, will close with discussion and highlight future directions.

Research Priorities to Support Women Veterans' Reproductive Health and Health Care Within a Learning Health Care System.

Research Priorities to Support Women Veterans' Reproductive Health and Health Care Within a Learning Health Care System.

VA Outreach Is an Essential Area for Improving Veterans' Health Care Accessibility.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is tasked with providing access to health care to veterans of military service. However, many eligible veterans have either not yet enrolled or underutilized VHA services. Further study of barriers to access before veterans enroll in VHA care is necessary to understand how to address this issue. The ChooseVA (née MyVA Access) initiative aims to achieve this mission to improve veterans' health care access. Although veteran outreach was not specifically addressed by the initiative, it is a critical component of improving veterans' access to health care. Findings from this multisite evaluation of ChooseVA implementation describe sites' efforts to improve VHA outreach and veterans' experiences with access. This quality improvement evaluation employed a multi-method qualitative methodology, including 127 semi-structured interviews and 81 focus groups with VHA providers and staff ("VHA staff") completed during 21 VHA medical center facility site visits between July and November 2017 and 48 telephone interviews with veterans completed between May and October 2018. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analyzed using deductive and inductive analysis to capture challenges and strategies to improve VHA health care access (VHA staff data), experiences with access to care (veteran data), barriers and facilitators to care (staff and veteran data), contextual factors, and emerging categories and themes. We developed focused themes describing perceived challenges, descriptions of VHA staff efforts to improve veteran outreach, and veterans' experiences with accessing VHA health care. VHA staff and veteran respondents reported a lack of veteran awareness of eligibility for VHA services. Veterans reported limited understanding of the range of services offered. This awareness gap served as a barrier to veterans' ability to successfully access VHA health care services. Veterans described this awareness gap as contributing to delayed VHA enrollment and delayed or underutilized health care benefits and services. Staff focused on community outreach and engaging veterans for VHA enrollment as part of their efforts to implement the ChooseVA access initiative. Staff and veteran respondents agreed that outreach efforts were helpful for engaging veterans and facilitating access. Although efforts across VHA programs informed veterans about VHA services, our results suggest that both VHA staff and veterans agreed that missed opportunities exist. Gaps include veterans' lack of awareness or understanding of VHA benefits for which they qualify for. This can result in delayed access to care which may negatively impact veterans, including those separating from the military and vulnerable populations such as veterans who experience pregnancy or homelessness.

Age-friendly care in the Veterans Health Administration: Past, present, and future.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has long recognized the need for age-friendly care. VHA leadership anticipated the impact of aging World War II veterans on VA healthcare systems and in 1975 developed Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers (GRECCs) to meet this need. GRECCs catalyzed a series of innovations in geriatric models of care that span the continuum of care, most of which endure. These innovative care models also contributed to the evidence base supporting the present-day Age-Friendly Health Systems movement, with which VHA is inherently aligned. As both a provider of and payor for care, VHA is strongly incentivized to promote coordination across the continuum of care, with resultant cost savings. VHA is also a major contributor to developing the workforce that is essential for the provision of age-friendly care. As VHA continues to develop and refine innovative geriatric models of care, policymakers and non-VHA health care systems should look to VHA programs as exemplars for the development and implementation of age-friendly care.

"Advancing" Advance Care Planning to Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.

The completion rate of Advance Directive (ADs) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is unknown. There is substantial literature on the need for effective Advance Care Planning (ACP) that leads to an AD to ensure that health care preferences for patients are known. Advance Directive are essential to consider since ACP, which explains and plans Advance Directive, does not reach all individuals. Health inequities, such as those experienced in rural areas, continue to exist. While ACP may disproportionately affect rural-residing veterans and their providers, a VHA program was specifically designed to increase ACP engagement with rural veterans and to address several systemic barriers to ACP. This descriptive analysis seeks to identify patient, provider, and geographic characteristics associated with higher rates of ACP participation in VHA. An observational examination of the profile of veterans and the types of ACP (e.g., individual or in groups) using administrative data for all beneficiaries receiving VHA health care services in federal fiscal year (FY) 2020 was conducted as part of a national program evaluation. The measures include patient-level data on demographics (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender), unique patient identifiers (e.g., name, social security number), geographic characteristics of patient's location (e.g., rurality defined as Rural-Urban Commuting Areas [RUCA]), VHA priority group; provider-level data (e.g., type of document definition, clinic stop codes, visit date used to verify Advance Care Planning via Group Visits [ACP-GV] attendance; data not shown), and electronic health record note titles that indicated the presence of ACP in VHA (e.g., "Advance Directive [AD] Discussion" note title, "ACP-GV CHAR 4 code"). Pearson's chi-square statistics were used for between-group comparisons based on a two-sided test with a significance level of 0.05. The overall rate of AD discussions among unique VHA users in FY2020 was 5.2% (95% CI: 5.2%-5.2%) and for Advance Care Planning via Group Visits, which targets rural veterans using groups, it was 1.8% (95% CI: 1.8%-1.9%). Advance Directive discussions in VHA are more successful at reaching middle age (M = 64; SD = 16), African Americans, males, veterans living in urban areas, and veterans with a VA disability (Priority Group 1-4). Advance Care Planning delivered in groups is reaching slightly younger veterans under the age of 75 years (M = 62; SD = 15), African Americans, females, disabled veterans (e.g., Priority Group 1-4), and more veterans residing in rural communities compared to the national population of VHA users. Advance Directive discussion rates are low across VHA, yet intentional efforts with ACP via group visits are reaching veterans who are considered underserved owing to residing in rural areas. Advance Care Planning needs to be a well-informed clinical priority for VHA to engage with the entire veteran population and to support the completion of ADs.

Supporting Veterans with dementia to remain in the community: strategies used in 12 Veterans Health Administration programs

ABSTRACT The Veterans Health Administration (VA) provides services to growing numbers of Veterans with dementIa, individuals at heightened risk for hospitalizations and nursing home placement. Beginning in 2010, the VA funded 12 innovative pilot programs to improve dementia care and help Veterans remain at home. We conducted a retrospective qualitative analysis of program materials and interviews with physicians, nurses, social workers, and other personnel (n = 33) to understand the strategies these programs adopted. Interviews were conducted every 6 months between 2010–2013 (4–5 interviews per program) and focused on factors affecting program design and implementation, challenges, and strategies to reduce hospitalizations and nursing home placements. Programs varied considerably yet shared three overarching strategies to improve dementia care: involving and supporting family caregivers; engaging interdisciplinary teams; and improving coordination with other healthcare providers. Our results highlight the importance of adapting common dementia care strategies based on the local context and needs of individuals served.

The impact of operational partnership on telemental health before, during, and after COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic significantly accelerated the growth of telehealth services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), as the use of video conferencing to meet with Veterans in their homes increased tenfold in a 3-month period. A substantial portion of telehealth in VHA has traditionally comprised mental health services, and both the scope and volume of such services were significantly broadened in response to COVID-19 to allow for social distancing. The current article is a review of this mobilization from the framework of the People, Process, Technology, and Information model, with a particular highlight on the critical operational partnership between individual facilities providing care and the governing VHA program offices. Lessons learned and future goals for the sustainment and integration of telemental health services are also discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Veterans' Reported Comfort in Disclosing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) does not routinely collect and document sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data despite research on health disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) veterans. Due to the legacy of previous Department of Defense policies that prohibited disclosure of sexual or gender minority identities among active-duty personnel, minority veterans may be reluctant to respond to SOGI questions on confidential VHA surveys and in discussions with their VHA providers. Veterans may generally find SOGI questions uncomfortable and may not appreciate their relevance to health care. The purpose of this research was to examine veterans' comfort in reporting identity characteristics on confidential VHA surveys and in discussion with their VHA providers and whether comfort differed by sociodemographic characteristics. The project involves the secondary analysis of quantitative data from a quality improvement survey project. A total of 806 veterans were surveyed. Overall, 7.15% endorsed sexual or gender minority identity which is a higher rate than the 4.5% noted in the general US population. Cisgender and heterosexual veterans were more comfortable reporting identity characteristics both on VHA confidential surveys and in discussion with VHA providers compared with SGM veterans. These data suggest that the majority of veterans feel comfortable reporting their identities both on surveys and in the context of health care. Understanding these perceptions can assist VHA programs in implementing SOGI data collection and disclosure in clinical care, creating a welcoming environment of care for SGM veterans that does not make veterans from other backgrounds feel uncomfortable.

Gender Difference in Substance Use and Psychiatric Outcomes Among Dually Diagnosed Veterans Treated in Specialized Intensive PTSD Programs

Objectives Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a problem of growing importance among female veterans, which is especially challenging when accompanied by comorbid substance use disorder (SUD). Since women are still a small minority of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients, there is concern that outcomes among dually diagnosed women may be worse than among men. Method National program evaluation data were collected at admission and 4 months after discharge from 7,074 dually diagnosed veterans including 203 women (2.9%) treated at 57 specialized intensive VHA PTSD treatment programs between 1993 and 2011. Multiple regression was used to compare clinical change in women and men adjusting for baseline differences. Results Women showed no significant differences from men in measures of substance use or total PTSD symptoms at admission although they were more likely to have experienced sexual trauma and less likely to report combat exposure. With adjustment for these differences, there were no significant gender differences in length of stay, satisfaction with treatment, or measures of change in substance use or total PTSD symptoms 4 months after discharge. Reductions in an index of days of substance use was associated with reduction in total PTSD symptoms among both women (R = 0.33; p = .01) and men (R = 0.44, p < .0001) with no significant gender difference. Conclusion No significant gender differences were observed in substance use or PTSD outcomes, despite the extreme minority status of women in VHA programs. Highly vulnerable women can benefit as much as men, even when treatment is not formally tailored to address gender-specific needs.

Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.

On July 1, 2018, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI). Its goal is to identify, document, and honor LST decisions of seriously ill veterans. Providers document veterans' goals and decisions using a standardized LST template and order set. Evaluate the first 7months of LSTDI implementation and identify predictors of LST template completion. Retrospective observational study of clinical and administrative data. We identified all completed LST templates, defined as completion of four required template fields. Templates also include four non-required fields. Results were stratified by risk of hospitalization or death as estimated by the Care Assessment Need (CAN) score. All veterans with VA utilization between July 1, 2018, and January 31, 2019. Completed LST templates, goals and LST preferences, and predictors of documentation. LST templates were documented for 108,145 veterans, and 85% had one or more of the non-required fields completed in addition to the required fields. Approximately half documented a preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Among those who documented specific goals, half wanted to improve or maintain function, independence, and quality of life while 28% had a goal of life prolongation irrespective of risk of hospitalization/death and 45% expressed a goal of comfort. Only 7% expressed a goal of being cured. Predictors of documentation included VA nursing home residence, older age, frailty, and comorbidity, while non-Caucasian race, rural residence, and receipt of care in a lower complexity medical center were predictive of no documentation. LST decisions were documented for veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death. While few expressed a preference for cure, half desire, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Predictors of documentation were generally consistent with existing literature. Opportunities to reduce observed disparities exist by leveraging available VA resources and programs.

Home-Based Primary Care's Role in Supporting the Older Old During Wildfires.

Objectives: There is limited understanding of how Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs support their medically complex patients in event of a disaster. This study aimed to identify emergency preparedness protocols and procedures undertaken in advance of and due to the 2017 Northern California wildfires by staff of the Veterans Health Administration (VA) HBPC programs. Methods: This study examines the experiences and responses of two VA HBPC programs to the 2017 Northern California wildfires. Six phone interviews were conducted from July to August 2018. The interview protocol addressed agency preparedness policies and procedures, continuity of care after the wildfires, as well as facilitators and barriers to disaster response. Results: The total patient census of participating HBPC programs was 300. Neither HBPC program reported a loss of life due to the wildfires. Early patient preparedness, effective leadership support, and strength of program operating procedures emerged as key factors to effective response. Conclusions: Demand for home health care, like VA’s HBPC program, is projected to grow as the number of older adults and longevity increases. Emergency management efforts must likewise evolve to address the unique needs of these vulnerable patients in disasters. Understanding the program activities conducted by the VA HBPC programs in response to the 2017 Northern California wildfires can help improve the understanding of how VA and non-VA home-based care programs can be best integrated into resilience planning of local communities.

Selection of Higher Risk Pregnancies into Veterans Health Administration Programs: Discoveries from Linked Department of Veterans Affairs and California Birth Data.

To describe variation in payer and outcomes in Veterans' births. Secondary data analyses of deliveries in California, 2000-2012. We performed a retrospective, population-based study of all live births to Veterans (confirmed via U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) enrollment records), to identify payer and variations in outcomes among: (1) Veterans using VA coverage and (2) Veteran vs. all other births. We calculated odds ratios (aOR) adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, education, and obstetric demographics. We anonymously linked VA administrative data for all female VA enrollees with California birth records. From 2000 to 2012, we identified 17,495 births to Veterans. VA covered 8.6 percent (1,508), Medicaid 17.3 percent, and Private insurance 47.6 percent. Veterans who relied on VA health coverage had more preeclampsia (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0-1.8) and more cesarean births (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.3), and, despite similar prematurity, trended toward more neonatal intensive care (NICU) admissions (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.4) compared to Veterans using other (non-Medicaid) coverage. Overall, Veterans' birth outcomes (all-payer) mirrored California's birth outcomes, with the exception of excess NICU care (aOR 1.15, CI 1.1-1.2). VA covers a higher risk fraction of Veterans' births, justifying maternal care coordination and attention to the maternal-fetal impacts of Veterans' comorbidities.

Linkage of VA and State Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Data to Examine Concurrent Opioid and Sedative-Hypnotic Prescriptions among Veterans.

To examine the prevalence of concurrent Veterans Health Administration (VA) and non-VA prescriptions for opioids and sedative-hypnotic medications among post-9/11 veterans in Oregon. VA health care and prescription data were probabilistically linked with Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) data. This retrospective cohort study examined concurrent prescriptions among n=19,959 post-9/11 veterans, by year (2014-2016) and by patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Veterans were included in the cohort for years in which they received VA outpatient care; those receiving hospice or palliative care were excluded. Concurrent prescriptions were defined as ≥1days of overlap between outpatient prescriptions for opioids and/or sedative-hypnotics (categorized as benzodiazepines vs. non-benzodiazepines). Among 5,882 veterans who filled opioid or sedative-hypnotic prescriptions at VA pharmacies, 1,036 (17.6 percent) filled concurrent prescriptions from non-VA pharmacies. Within drug class, 15.1, 8.8, and 4.6 percent received concurrent VA and non-VA opioids, benzodiazepines, and non-benzodiazepines, respectively. Veteran demographics and clinical diagnoses were associated with the likelihood of concurrent prescriptions, as was enrollment in the Veterans Choice Program. A considerable proportion of post-9/11 veterans receiving VA care in Oregon filled concurrent prescriptions for opioids and sedative-hypnotics. Fragmentation of care may contribute to prescription drug overdose risk among veterans.

Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services for Women in the Veterans Health Administration

PurposeThe present study used national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility-level data to examine the extent of women's specialty substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programming in the VHA. In addition, the study compared facilities with women's specialty SUD programming with facilities without to determine whether having this programming was associated with serving other special patient populations, treatment staffing, and breadth of service provision. MethodsThe study used data from the VHA Program Evaluation and Resource Center's Drug and Alcohol Program Survey, conducted in 2015 (100% response rate among VHA specialty SUD treatment programs). Program responses were calculated at the facility level (n = 140 VHA facilities). Main FindingsThe majority of VHA facilities (85%) provided women veterans with SUD-specific individual psychotherapy. However, only 30% of facilities provided SUD-specific groups for women only, and only 14% provided SUD–posttraumatic stress disorder groups for women only in specialty SUD treatment. VHA facilities with greater numbers of specialty SUD treatment staff members, a greater breadth of staff roles, and a broader scope of treatment services, activities, and practices were more likely to provide women-only groups. ConclusionsBecause the number of women veterans in specialty SUD treatment is likely to continue to grow, these data serve as a benchmark against which future administrations of the Drug and Alcohol Program Survey will document the extent to which VHA services are responsive to their needs.

Accelerating Research Impact in a Learning Health Care System: VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative in the Choice Act Era.

Background:Since 1998, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) has supported more rapid implementation of research into clinical practice.Objectives:With the passage of the Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act of 2014 (Choice Act), QUERI further evolved to support VHA’s transformation into a Learning Health Care System by aligning science with clinical priority goals based on a strategic planning process and alignment of funding priorities with updated VHA priority goals in response to the Choice Act.Design:QUERI updated its strategic goals in response to independent assessments mandated by the Choice Act that recommended VHA reduce variation in care by providing a clear path to implement best practices. Specifically, QUERI updated its application process to ensure its centers (Programs) focus on cross-cutting VHA priorities and specify roadmaps for implementation of research-informed practices across different settings. QUERI also increased funding for scientific evaluations of the Choice Act and other policies in response to Commission on Care recommendations.Results:QUERI’s national network of Programs deploys effective practices using implementation strategies across different settings. QUERI Choice Act evaluations informed the law’s further implementation, setting the stage for additional rigorous national evaluations of other VHA programs and policies including community provider networks.Conclusions:Grounded in implementation science and evidence-based policy, QUERI serves as an example of how to operationalize core components of a Learning Health Care System, notably through rigorous evaluation and scientific testing of implementation strategies to ultimately reduce variation in quality and improve overall population health.

Comparison of Complication Rates in Veterans Receiving Cataract Surgery Through the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare

To compare the 90-day rates of select secondary procedures after cataract extraction in patients having fee-for-service surgery under Medicare to surgeries provided through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) during the same calendar year. Medicare, VHA, and VHA Fee Basis Program data for calendar year 2007 were merged to identify a cohort of veterans that had outpatient cataract surgery. Secondary surgeries were tracked using selected Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as surrogate markers for complications. Primary surgery and corrective surgeries were linked through right and left eye CPT modifier codes. Risks of complications were adjusted for race, age, sex, and ocular and medical comorbidities. A total of 223,873 cataract extractions were performed on veterans during calendar year 2007, 88.4% of which were provided through Medicare. The 90-day overall rate of CPT-coded secondary procedures was greater for patients having cataract surgery through the VHA (37.2 per 1000 surgeries) than Medicare (18.2 per 1000 surgeries). The overall rate was influenced primarily by higher rates of vitrectomy and related procedures, after both routine and complex cataract extractions. The adjusted odds ratio of vitrectomy within 90 days of routine cataract surgery in the VHA with reference to Medicare was 3.77 (95% confidence interval, 3.44-4.14). In 2007, the pattern and rates of secondary surgeries after cataract extraction varied between the Medicare and the VHA programs. If these results are confirmed, further research to identify the sources of higher secondary procedure rates is warranted to enhance patient safety.

Criminal Justice Involvement of Armed Forces Veterans in Two Systems of Care

This study compared criminal justice involvement of veterans before and after receiving services from community-based programs of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (N=1,640) or a state Department of Mental Health (DMH) (N= 693). Anonymous extracts from VHA, DMH, and statewide criminal charging databases were analyzed by probabilistic population estimation to determine criminal charging rates in the years before and after the year of service receipt in each system of care. Veterans who received DMH services experienced a greater reduction in the rate of criminal charging than veterans who received VHA services (43% and 17% reductions). For veterans with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders, rates were reduced 33% among VHA service recipients, whereas they increased 48% among DMH service recipients. These differences indicate that the design of veterans' behavioral health service delivery systems would benefit from cross-sector outcome measures that complement clinical measures such as those used nationally by the VHA.

Integrating mental health into primary care within the Veterans Health Administration.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been undertaking a major transformational program of integrating collaborative mental health resources into primary care settings. Key components of the program include colocated collaborative care provided by mental health professionals; care management; and blended programs that combine elements of these two components, whose functions are highly complementary to each other. The program has grown since 2007 from an initiative implementing pilot programs at participating facilities, to a routine expectation of primary care within all VHA medical centers and large community-based outpatient clinics. The national program office supports this VHA initiative in multiple ways, including technical assistance to sites, program and policy development, dissemination of informational tools to facilitate continuous quality improvement, education and training, and partnerships with other existing and emerging VHA programs such as postdeployment health clinics and the patient-centered medical home.