Veterans Affairs Mental Health Research Articles

Does screening for PTSD lead to VA mental health care? Identifying the spectrum of initial VA screening actions.

Despite the active posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) screening program in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics and the availability of empirically supported treatments for PTSD at VA, many veterans for whom screening suggests treatment may be indicated do not gain access to VA-based mental health care. To determine where we may be losing veterans to follow-up, we need to begin by identifying the initial action taken in response to a positive PTSD screen in primary care. Using VA administrative data and chart review, we identified the spectrum of initial actions taken after veterans screened positive for PTSD in VA primary care clinics nationwide between October 2017 and September 2018 (N = 41,570). We collapsed actions into those that could lead to VA-based mental health care (e.g., consult placed to a VA mental health clinic) versus not (e.g., veteran declined care), and then examined the association between these categories of actions and contextual- and individual-level variables. More than 61% of veterans with positive PTSD screens had evidence that an initial action toward VA-based mental health care was taken. Urban-dwelling and female veterans were significantly more likely to have evidence of these initial actions, whereas White and Vietnam-era veterans were significantly less likely to have this evidence. Our findings suggest that most veterans screening positive for PTSD in VA primary care clinics have evidence of initial actions taken toward VA-based mental health care; however, a substantial minority do not, making them unlikely to receive follow-up care. Findings highlight the potential benefit of targeted primary care-based access interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Military sexual trauma among Veterans using and not using VA justice-related programing: A national examination

Veterans accessing Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Justice Program (VJP) services have high rates of depression, substance misuse, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Although factors that may confer risk for mental health sequelae among these Veterans have been identified (e.g., childhood abuse, combat exposure), limited research has examined report of military sexual trauma (MST) among Veterans accessing VJP services. As survivors of MST experience myriad chronic health conditions which necessitate identification and referral to evidence-based care, identifying MST survivors among those accessing VJP services may facilitate referral to appropriate services. We examined whether MST prevalence differed between Veterans with and without a history of VJP service use. Sex-stratified analyses were conducted with 1,300,252 male (13.34% accessing VJP) and 106,680 female (10.14% accessing VJP) Veterans. In crude models, male and female Veterans accessing VJP services were significantly more likely to screen positive for MST (PR = 3.35 and 1.82 respectively). Significance was maintained in models that adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, VA service use, and VA mental health use. VJP service settings may serve as a critical intercept for identifying male and female survivors of MST. Using a trauma-informed approach to screen for MST in VJP settings is likely warranted. Moreover, integration of MST programing into VJP settings may be beneficial.

In-person and telehealth treatment of veterans with insomnia disorder using cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment for insomnia disorder. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical benefits of CBT-I to veterans with insomnia disorder during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic using an uncontrolled observational design. A cohort of 63 Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health providers delivered CBT-I to 180 veterans as part of an evidence-based psychotherapy training program and captured de-identified treatment outcome data through a data portal. The main patient outcomes were change in the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) total score from the initial clinical assessment session to the last treatment session, response rate (% with ISI change > 7 from assessment to last session), and remission rate (% with ISI < 8 at the last session). We tested the noninferiority of telehealth only compared with at least 1 in-person session. Fifty-six percent of veterans seen for an evaluation completed CBT-I treatment during the structured training program phase and completed an initial and final ISI. Among these veterans, ISI scores decreased by an average of 9.9 points from before to after treatment (P < .001), 66% experienced a clinically meaningful treatment response, and 43% experienced insomnia symptom remission. Benefits were similar whether the veteran received some in-person care or received CBT-I entirely via telehealth. Findings suggest, regardless of treatment modality, CBT-I remained highly effective during the early months of the pandemic, which was a challenging time for both clinical providers and veterans in need of insomnia treatment. Martin JL, DeViva J, McCarthy E, etal. In-person and telehealth treatment of veterans with insomnia disorder using cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(7):1211-1217.

Training Staff Across the Veterans Affairs Health Care System to Use Mobile Mental Health Apps: A National Quality Improvement Project.

The National Center for PTSD, within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), has developed a suite of free, publicly available, evidence-informed apps that can reach an increasing number of veterans and bridge gaps in care by providing resources to those who are not engaged in mental health treatment. To expand the reach of these apps, staff across VA service lines learned about these apps, their features and limitations, and how to introduce them to veterans. This study aimed to develop, disseminate, and evaluate a training for multidisciplinary staff as part of a national quality improvement project to increase the reach of mobile mental health apps as a resource for veterans. Sites from all of VA's 18 geographic regions enrolled in this project. At each site, a minimum of 25 VA staff members who had direct contact with veterans, including staff from the mental health service line and all other service lines, were recruited to participate. Training included a 3-hour multidisciplinary core module, and a 1-hour clinical integration module designed specifically for mental health clinicians. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the trainings were adapted to a live, web-based format. Pre- and posttraining surveys assessed program reach (ie, participants enrolled per site), satisfaction, and effectiveness of the training as measured by changes in knowledge, basic skills, and behavioral intentions to use apps with veterans. A total of 1110 participants representing 34 disciplines at 19 VA sites completed the training. Overall, 67% (743/1109) of participants were mental health staff members. Sites averaged 58.4 participants (SD 36.49, median [IQR] 51). Most (961/1024, 93.85%) participants were satisfied with the training and reported that they (941/1018, 92.44%) would recommend it to others. App knowledge scores significantly increased from pretraining (mean 80.8% correct, SD 15.77%) to posttraining (mean 91.1% correct, SD 9.57%; P<.001). At posttraining, participants also reported greater confidence in their ability to show veterans how to download (z=-13.86; P<.001) and use VA mental health apps (z=-15.13; P<.001). There was near universal endorsement by staff for their intentions to recommend apps to veterans as well as their ability to think of at least one specific veteran to whom they could recommend an app. Staff also reported a strong motivation to encourage other VA staff to share apps with veterans. The training far exceeded the initial goals for staff recruitment and training for all three metrics. Overall, 33% (366/1109) of participants came from service lines outside of mental health, indicating the feasibility of introducing these mental health resources during medical appointments and in other contexts.

Looking to the VA for a roadmap on how to sustain tele-mental health care.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a rapid increase in tele-mental health care availability in the United States. Although this change has the potential to help alleviate unmet need for mental health care in underserved areas, there are system and policy challenges to sustain tele-mental health models beyond the pandemic. The United States Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) has long been a national leader in offering tele-mental health care. Using data from the National Mental Health Services Survey from 2010 to 2020, this brief report describes growth in tele-mental health care in VA and non-VA mental health facilities over a decade. The study used a sample of approximately 12,000 VA and non-VA mental health facilities in the United States and examined the availability of tele-mental health among facilities. Tele-mental health offerings increased dramatically in 2020, growing from 12% to 35% of facilities across 2010-2019 and then to 69% of facilities in 2020. Nearly, 90% of VA facilities offered tele-mental health during the same time period, and this percentage increased to 98% in 2020. Adapting tele-mental health innovations in the VA for other underserved populations and building a national infrastructure for tele-mental health may promote ongoing use of virtual care models to meet mental health care access challenges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

"Observations from the national implementation of Measurement Based Care in Mental Health in the Department of Veterans Affairs": Correction.

Reports an error in "Observations from the national implementation of Measurement Based Care in Mental Health in the Department of Veterans Affairs" by Sandra G. Resnick and Rani A. Hoff (Psychological Services, 2020[Aug], Vol 17[3], 238-246). In the original article, the data reported in Figure 1 are incorrect. The baseline data point (FY16Q3) is 16.8% for Champion Sites, and 16.6% for non-Champion Sites. The final data point (FY18Q3) is 28.8% for Champion Sites, and 26.1% for non-Champion Sites. The corrected Figure 1 is present in the erratum. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2019-24508-001). In 2016, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began the Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Initiative to implement measurement-based care (MBC) across all mental health programs with the goal of making MBC the national standard of care. Phase 1 of this initiative, beginning in fall 2016 through fall 2017, was carefully designed to meet the ambitious goals of the organization while minimizing implementation barriers. Phase 1 participants reported an increase in MBC implementation across mental health programs with a simultaneous increase in the proportion of patient-reported outcome measures among veterans new to mental health care. The initiative adopted a broad range of strategies informed by implementation science to facilitate implementation at the organizational, provider, and patient level which are described here. The initiative was successful, but use of patient-reported outcome measures across VA mental health remains proportionally low. Technology, VA's hierarchical structure, and competition from other VA mental health initiatives may have slowed national implementation efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

A Veterans Affairs' perspective in response to Best Practice Model Subcommittee attribute statements for outpatient psychiatric pharmacists.

We applaud the work published by Lee et al1 and the best practice model subcommittee in their attribute statements for defining the optimal recommendations for outpatient psychiatric pharmacy practice. This serves as an excellent foundation in standardizing the expectations for clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPP) within outpatient mental health (MH) settings and our group believes these defined statements are being applied at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).2 Measurement-based care, suicide assessment, and comprehensive medication management (CMM) are all standards of care for VA outpatient MH CPP.3 The goal of our letter is to highlight the VA MH CPP model and the advancements in access, quality impact, and standardization.Integrating the MH CPP into the team-based care model significantly improves access to care, primarily when the CPP is utilized as a primary MH provider. Many strong CPP practices within the VA have been identified, including CPP integration into primary care MH services, outpatient MH clinics, specialty MH, and residential rehabilitation programs. Other strategies utilized by VA MH CPP to optimize access include utilizing analytics to target specific clinical interventions (population management), posthospital discharge appointments, and enhanced patient care in suicide risk stratification.In October 2017, the VA Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) partnered with the Office of Rural Health to increase access to care for veterans by utilizing MH CPPs as MH prescribers. Within 2½ years from its inception, 40 MH CPPs were hired, which increased direct patient care access and quality by providing CMM for 51 210 rural-residing patients.4 Due to the initiative's positive impact on patient care, an additional 46 MH CPP were hired in FY20/21, which demonstrates the importance of optimizing the MH CPP role in the team-based care model.MH CPP within the VA have established guidance for how to create a positive impact in the VA's internal performance metrics, including population management, continuity of care, experience of care, behavioral health screenings, and suicide risk management. They are also instrumental in serving as facility champions for psychotropic stewardship and safety. One of the attribute statements proposed by Lee et al1 recommends prescriptive authority and/or a collaborative practice agreement. In collaboration with VA PBM, a care coordination agreement (CCA) was created for MH CPP and establishes a partnership between MH and pharmacy services. This CCA covers many of the attribute statements, including attribute statements 14-24 and 27. The CCA is approved by service leadership and the chief of staff to ensure these attribute statements are being upheld. The PBM has also developed a business rules document to guide standardization of MH CPP practice within the VA. This includes in-depth descriptions defining clinical pharmacy practice, patient care delivery, optimizing access and integration, and documentation of workload.Overall, the VA has taken great strides to advance the practice of MH CPPs. Current practice by VA MH CPPs incorporates many of the attribute statements. We are hopeful that these well-developed attribute statements will help foster all psychiatric pharmacists to practice at the highest level of care, achieve reimbursement for clinical services, and bolster patient and provider satisfaction.

Understanding Veteran Suicide Risk and Mitigation Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic

U.S. Veterans experience a significantly higher risk for suicide compared to the general population. Understanding the challenges associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) enables providers to mitigate the risk of suicide among Veterans. Evidence supports access and utilization of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health services as they are a protective factor associated with lower suicide rates. During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the VA has worked to further decrease deaths by suicide in the Veteran population by rapid expansion of current interventions and implementation of new evidence-based interventions. These interventions include mental health and coaching applications, consistent use of measurement-based care across multiple disciplines, and greater use of telehealth services. Through these efforts, despite increased risk for suicide due to additional stressors from COVID-19, suicide rates among Veterans are decreasing. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 60(12), 25-29.].

Supplemental Material for Addressing Female Trainee Experiences of Sexual Harassment and Discrimination in a Veterans Affairs Mental Health Service

Supplemental Material for Addressing Female Trainee Experiences of Sexual Harassment and Discrimination in a Veterans Affairs Mental Health Service

A comparison of patient-reported mental health outcomes for the Department of Veterans Affairs' regional telehealth and Community Care Programs.

ObjectivesTo compare patient‐reported outcomes for veterans with limited access to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health services referred to the Veterans Community Care Program (VCCP) or regional telehealth Clinical Resource Hubs‐Mental Health (CRH‐MH).Data SourcesThis national evaluation used secondary data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, chart review, and primary data collected by baseline survey between October 8, 2019 and May 27, 2020 and a 4‐month follow‐up survey.Study DesignA quasi‐experimental longitudinal study design was used to sample 545 veterans with VCCP or CRH‐MH referrals for new treatment episodes. Patient‐reported outcomes included symptom severity, perceived access, utilization, and patient‐centeredness.Data CollectionDuring the baseline and follow‐up surveys, all veterans were administered the Patient Health Questionnaire‐8 (PHQ‐8) to assess depression severity, and veterans with a provisional diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were also administered the PTSD Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5) to assess PTSD symptom severity. The 4‐month follow‐up survey also asked about perceived access using the Perceived Access Inventory, the number of encounters, and patient‐centeredness of care using the Patient‐Centered Care portion of the Veterans Satisfaction Survey.Principal FindingsResults indicated that compared to VCCP consults, veterans with CRH‐MH consults reported 0.65 (CI95 = 0.51–0.83, p < 0.01) times the number of barriers to care, but a non‐significant lower number of encounters (−0.792, CI95 −2.221, 0.636, p = 0.28). There was no significant (p = 0.24) difference in satisfaction with patient‐centeredness, with both groups “agreeing” on average to positively worded questions. Veterans in both groups experienced little improvement in depression or PTSD symptom severity, and there were no clinically meaningful differences between groups.ConclusionsOverall findings indicate that the CRH‐MH and VCCP generate similar patient‐reported outcomes. Future research should compare the quality and cost of care delivered by the VCCP and CRH‐MH programs.

Let’s Get “REAL”: A Collaborative Group Therapy for Moral Injury

Moral injury is a particular response to profoundly distressing life events that manifests in damage to basic human/relational capacities, such as trust, autonomy, initiative, competence, identity, and intimacy. This paper describes and presents preliminary outcomes of “Reclaiming Experiences And Loss,” or “REAL,” which is an innovative moral injury group therapy that was developed collaboratively by Veterans Affairs mental health and spiritual care providers. Clinical outcome measures collected pre- and post-group indicates that REAL is effective at reducing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Additionally, a cohort case example demonstrates the impact of REAL as told through individual stories as well as the intersectionality and interactions that comprise a typical REAL cohort and are considered central to care. Implications for ongoing care and future research are discussed.

Patient and provider predictors of telemental health use prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The current study examined patient and provider differences in use of phone, video, and in-person mental health (MH) services. Participants included patients who completed ≥ 1 MH appointment within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from 10/1/17-7/10/20 and providers who completed ≥ 100 VA MH appointments from 10/1/17-7/10/20. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) are reported of patients and providers: (a) completing ≥1 video MH appointment in the pre-COVID (10/1/17-3/10/20) and COVID (3/11/20-7/10/20) periods; and (b) completing the majority of MH visits via phone, video, or in-person during COVID. The sample included 2,480,119 patients/31,971 providers in the pre-COVID period, and 1,054,670 patients/23,712 providers in the COVID period. During the pre-COVID and COVID periods, older patients had lower odds of completing ≥ 1 video visit (aORs < .65). During the COVID period, older age and low socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of having ≥ 50% of visits via video versus in-person or phone (aORs < .68); schizophrenia and MH hospitalization history predicted lower odds of having ≥ 50% of visits via video or phone versus in-person (aORs < . 64). During the pre-COVID and COVID periods, nonpsychologists (e.g., psychiatrists) had lower odds of completing video visits (aORs < . 44). Older providers had lower odds of completing ≥ 50% of visits via video during COVID (aORs <. 69). Findings demonstrate a digital divide, such that older and lower income patients, and older providers, engaged in less video care. Nonpsychologists also had lower video use. Barriers to use must be identified and strategies must be implemented to ensure equitable access to video MH services. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Bridging the Acute-to-Outpatient Care Gap in Mental Health: Developing and Implementing a Mental Health Transition Process.

A national Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health (MH) quality metric tracks engagement in outpatient MH care after discharge from residential and inpatient settings, with recommendations for 2 or more visits 30 days postdischarge. A gap in transitioning patients from residential to outpatient MH care was identified at this site. A transition management process was developed and piloted, including a new MH Discharge Consult and an RN Transition Care Managers team. Transition Care Managers triaged Discharge Consults, communicated with schedulers and patients pre- and postdischarge, and tracked MH engagement for 30 days postdischarge. Process, outcome, and balancing measures were developed and iteratively adjusted using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Over 55 weeks, 443 Discharge Consults were placed. There was an average 89% success rate in connecting patients with 2 or more MH visits versus 53% preintervention. This pilot showed promising results in improving postdischarge MH engagement with the use of PDSA cycles to collect data and refine processes.

Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review.

BackgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly implemented internationally, whereas digital sharing of EHRs with service users (SUs) is a relatively new practice. Studies of patient-accessible EHRs (PAEHRs)—often referred to as open notes—have revealed promising results within general medicine settings. However, studies carried out in mental health care (MHC) settings highlight several ethical and practical challenges that require further exploration.ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to map available evidence on PAEHRs in MHC. We seek to relate findings with research from other health contexts, to compare different stakeholders’ perspectives, expectations, actual experiences with PAEHRs, and identify potential research gaps.MethodsA systematic scoping review was performed using 6 electronic databases. Studies that focused on the digital sharing of clinical notes or EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions up to September 2021 were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Extension for Scoping Reviews guided narrative synthesis and reporting of findings.ResultsOf the 1034 papers screened, 31 were included in this review. The studies used mostly qualitative methods or surveys and were predominantly published after 2018 in the United States. PAEHRs were examined in outpatient (n=29) and inpatient settings (n=11), and a third of all research was conducted in Veterans Affairs Mental Health. Narrative synthesis allowed the integration of findings according to the different stakeholders. First, SUs reported mainly positive experiences with PAEHRs, such as increased trust in their clinician, health literacy, and empowerment. Negative experiences were related to inaccurate notes, disrespectful language use, or uncovering of undiscussed diagnoses. Second, for health care professionals, concerns outweigh the benefits of sharing EHRs, including an increased clinical burden owing to more documentation efforts and possible harm triggered by reading the notes. Third, care partners gained a better understanding of their family members’ mental problems and were able to better support them when they had access to their EHR. Finally, policy stakeholders and experts addressed ethical challenges and recommended the development of guidelines and trainings to better prepare both clinicians and SUs on how to write and read notes.ConclusionsPAEHRs in MHC may strengthen user involvement, patients’ autonomy, and shift medical treatment to a coproduced process. Acceptance issues among health care professionals align with the findings from general health settings. However, the corpus of evidence on digital sharing of EHRs with people affected by mental health conditions is limited. Above all, further research is needed to examine the clinical effectiveness, efficiency, and implementation of this sociotechnical intervention.

Small Area Analysis of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services Data.

To identify geographic variation in mental health service use in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the authors constructed utilization-based VA mental health service areas (MHSAs) for outpatient treatment and mental health referral regions (MHRRs) for residential and acute inpatient treatment. MHSAs are empirically derived geographic groupings of one or more counties containing one or more VA outpatient mental health clinics. For each county within an MHSA, patients received most of their VA-provided outpatient mental health care within that MHSA. MHSAs were aggregated into MHRRs according to where VA users in each MHSA received most of their residential and acute inpatient mental health care. Attribution loyalty was evaluated with the localization index-the fraction of VA users living in each geographic area who used their designated MHSA and MHRR facility. Variation in outpatient mental health visits and in acute inpatient and residential mental health stays was determined for the 2008-2018 period. A total of 441 MHSAs were aggregated to 115 MHRRs (representing 3,909,080 patients with 52,372,303 outpatient mental health visits). The mean±SD localization index was 59.3%±16.4% for MHSAs and 67.8%±12.7% for MHRRs. Adjusted outpatient mental health visits varied from a mean of 0.88 per year in the lowest quintile of MHSAs to 3.14 in the highest. Combined residential and acute inpatient days varied from 0.29 to 1.79 between the lowest and highest quintiles. MHSAs and MHRRs validly represented mental health utilization patterns in the VA and displayed considerable variation in mental health service provision across different locations.

The Association Between Smoking Abstinence and Pain Trajectory Among Veterans Engaged in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Care

AbstractObjectiveTo prospectively examine associations between smoking and nicotine abstinence and pain trajectory over 12 months among smokers with low, moderate, and severe pain and to assess whether these associations differ over time.DesignA secondary analysis of the “Proactive Outreach for Smokers in VA Mental Health” study, a randomized controlled trial of proactive outreach for veteran smokers engaged in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health care.MethodsParticipants were categorized into “low” (n = 616), “moderate” (n = 479), and “severe” pain (n = 656) groups according to baseline pain score. Associations between self-reported abstinence from smoking and nicotine at 6 and 12 months and pain trajectory, measured via the PEG scale (Pain intensity, Enjoyment of life, General activity) composite score, were assessed through the use of general linear mixed models. Interaction tests assessed whether these associations differed at 6 and 12 months. Analyses were conducted within the overall sample and within the separate pain groups.ResultsThere were significant interactions in the overall sample and the low and moderate pain groups, such that 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence was associated with lower pain scores at 6 but not 12 months. In the severe pain group, 7-day abstinence from both smoking and nicotine was associated with lower pain scores across both time points. Six-month prolonged abstinence was not associated with pain scores.ConclusionsIn this prospective analysis conducted among veteran smokers engaged in mental health services, 7-day abstinence from smoking and nicotine was associated with significantly lower levels of pain. Education efforts could help better inform smokers on the relationship between smoking and pain.

Proactive tobacco treatment for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.

Individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) smoke at higher rates compared to the general population and experience significant barriers to initiating cessation treatment. Proactive outreach addresses these barriers by directly engaging with smokers and facilitating access to treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate a proactive outreach intervention for increasing rates of treatment utilization and abstinence among veteran smokers with and without PTSD. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial conducted from 2013 to 2017 that demonstrated the effectiveness of proactive outreach among veterans using Veterans Affairs mental health care services. Electronic medical record data were used to identify participants with (n = 355) and without (n = 1,583) a diagnosis of PTSD. Logistic regressions modeled cessation treatment utilization (counseling, nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], and combination treatment) and abstinence (7-day point prevalence and 6-month prolonged at 6- and 12-month follow-ups) among participants randomized to proactive outreach versus usual care in the PTSD and non-PTSD subgroups, respectively. Compared to usual care, proactive outreach increased combined counseling and NRT utilization among participants with PTSD (odds ratio [OR] = 26.25, 95% confidence interval [3.43, 201.17]) and without PTSD (OR = 10.20, [5.21, 19.98]). Proactive outreach also increased 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12 months among participants with PTSD (OR = 2.62, [1.16, 5.91]) and without PTSD (OR = 1.61, [1.11, 2.34]). Proactive outreach increased treatment utilization and abstinence among smokers with and without PTSD. Smokers with PTSD may need additional facilitation to initiate cessation treatment but are receptive when it is offered proactively. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Factors affecting the implementation of evidence-based Progressive Tinnitus Management in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

Progressive Tinnitus Management (PTM) is an evidence-based interdisciplinary stepped-care approach to improving quality of life for patients with tinnitus. PTM was endorsed by Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Audiology leadership in 2009. Factors affecting implementation of PTM are unknown. We conducted a study to: 1) estimate levels of PTM program implementation in VA Audiology and Mental Health clinics across the country; and 2) identify barriers and facilitators to PTM implementation based on the experiences of VA audiologists and mental health providers. We conducted an anonymous, web-based survey targeting Audiology and Mental Health leaders at 144 major VA facilities. Quantitative analyses summarized respondents' facility characteristics and levels of program implementation (full PTM, partial PTM, or no PTM). Qualitative analyses identified themes in factors influencing the implementation of PTM across VA sites. Surveys from 87 audiologists and 66 mental health clinicians revealed that few facilities offered full PTM; the majority offered partial or no PTM. Inductive analysis of the open-ended survey responses identified seven factors influencing implementation of PTM: 1) available resources, 2) service collaboration, 3) prioritization, 4) Veterans' preferences and needs, 5) clinician training, 6) awareness of (evidence-based) options, and 7) perceptions of scope of practice. Results suggest wide variation in services provided, a need for greater engagement of mental health providers in tinnitus care, and an interest among both audiologists and mental health providers in receiving tinnitus-related training. Future research should address barriers to PTM implementation, including methods to: 1) improve understanding among mental health providers of their potential role in tinnitus management; 2) enhance coordination of tinnitus-related care between health care disciplines; and 3) collect empirical data on Veterans' need for and interest in PTM, including delivery by telehealth modalities.

Patterns of Treatment Utilization Across the Perinatal Period in the Center for Maternal and Infant Outcomes and Research in Translation (COMFORT) Veterans Study

Background: Women Veterans using Veterans Affairs (VA) maternity care represent a high-risk population owing to the high prevalence of psychiatric disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Given the increased risk of symptom recurrence and/or medication discontinuation during pregnancy, the aim of this study was to understand the relationship between mental health and health care utilization in pregnant Veterans within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Materials and Methods: Women with a confirmed pregnancy were recruited from 15 VA sites across the United States. Data sources included diagnosis codes, clinic stop codes for outpatient visits, and 30-day antidepressant prescriptions in the electronic health record. Results: Overall, mental health visits increased slightly from prepregnancy to pregnancy before decreasing in the postpartum period. For women with a prepregnancy diagnosis of depression, anxiety, and/or PTSD, there was an increase in psychotherapy utilization during the pregnancy and postpartum periods, whereas the percentage of women utilizing antidepressants only or antidepressants plus therapy decreased during these same time periods. A small proportion of women with histories of mental health conditions did not utilize mental health care within the VA during pregnancy and postpartum. Conclusions: These results inform our understanding of VA health care utilization patterns in pregnant Veterans, particularly those with a history of depression, PTSD, and/or anxiety. The strong utilization of VA mental health services during this time emphasizes the importance of optimizing the coordination of care between VA mental health providers and community-provided obstetric care to enhance outcomes for both mother and child.

Exploring the Extent of Perinatal Depression Screening in the Health Records of Veterans.

To investigate adherence by Veterans Affairs (VA) providers to perinatal depression screening clinical practice guidelines (two prenatal and one postpartum screen). Women Veterans who enrolled in a multisite cohort study during pregnancy and delivered newborns between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 were included. VA electronic health record (EHR) and claims data identified the start of pregnancy care, depression screens, and medical history. Prenatal and postpartum telephone surveys collected demographics, pregnancy characteristics, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores. Data from EHRs was combined with telephone survey data to create the analytic dataset (n = 663). Most (93%) Veterans had primary care at the VA during pregnancy; 41% saw a VA mental health provider. Perinatal depression screens were conducted with 43% of Veterans; 13% had both prenatal and postnatal screens. Screened Veterans were less likely to be diagnosed with depression by a VA provider in either the preconception or pregnancy time periods compared to those not screened (11% vs. 24% and 14% vs 23%, respectively). Among unscreened women, 18% scored positive for depression prenatally and 9% postnatally on the EPDS. Less than half of our sample had evidence of depression screening during the perinatal period, despite contact with VA providers. Perinatal Veterans sustaining VA mental health care may account for fewer screens. Lack of screening may hinder connection to VA mental health treatment and referral resources for symptomatic women. VA should ensure Veterans receive perinatal depression screening to mediate the risks of depression on Veterans and their children.