Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Research Articles

Diagnostic uncertainty and decision-making in home-based primary care: A qualitative study of antibiotic prescribing.

Evaluating infection in home-based primary care is challenging, and these challenges may impact antibiotic prescribing. A refined understanding of antibiotic decision-making in this setting can inform strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship. This study investigated antibiotic decision-making by exploring the perspectives of clinicians in home-based primary care. Clinicians from the Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Program were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were conducted from June 2022 through September 2022 using a discussion guide. Transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory. The constant comparative method was used to develop a coding structure and to identify themes. Theoretical saturation was reached after 22 clinicians (physicians, n = 7; physician assistants, n = 2, advanced practice registered nurses, n = 13) from 19 programs were interviewed. Mean age was 48.5 ± 9.3 years, 91% were female, and 59% had ≥6 years of experience in home-based primary care. Participants reported uncertainty about the diagnosis of infection due to the characteristics of homebound patients (atypical presentations of disease, presence of multiple chronic conditions, presence of cognitive impairment) and the challenges of delivering medical care in the home (limited access to diagnostic testing, suboptimal quality of microbiological specimens, barriers to establishing remote access to the electronic health record). When faced with diagnostic uncertainty about infection, participants described many factors that influenced the decision to prescribe antibiotics, including those that promoted prescribing (desire to avoid hospitalization, pressure from caregivers, unreliable plans for follow-up) and those that inhibited prescribing (perceptions of antibiotic-associated harms, willingness to trial non-pharmacological interventions first, presence of caregivers who were trusted by clinicians to monitor symptoms). Clinicians face the difficult task of balancing diagnostic uncertainty with many competing considerations during the treatment of infection in home-based primary care. Recognizing these issues provides insight into strategies to promote antibiotic stewardship in home care settings.

Trajectories of care and outcomes of Veterans receiving home-based primary care.

Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) provides comprehensive longitudinal care to patients with complex, chronic disabling disease. While enrollment is associated with lower hospitalization rates and costs, detailed trajectories have not been well described. We performed a longitudinal descriptive study of patients newly enrolled in VA HBPC in fiscal year (FY) 2015. We extracted demographics, comorbidities, functional status, and social supports from VA and Medicare data and examined patterns of care and clinical outcomes, including hospital, nursing home (NH), hospice use and mortality from FY2015-2017. We present results using descriptive statistics, alluvial plots, and heat maps. We identified 10,571 HBPC enrollees in FY2015; mean age was 77.7. HBPC patients commonly had chronic medical conditions with high self-management burden (e.g., diabetes 48.2%) and disabling conditions such as dementia (39.3%). Over half had ≥2 deficits in activities of daily living, 46% had caregivers with functional limitations or no caregiver, and 25% resided in a socially deprived area. Patients experienced variable care trajectories. Mean time enrolled in HBPC was 331 days, 8.3% of patients were discharged after 3 months, and 22.8% stayed enrolled for over 2 years. Institutional health care use declined in the 6 months after initial enrollment: (e.g., hospital: 41%-25%, NH: 34%-11%). At 2 years, 36% of patients had died; among decedents, 58% received hospice and 72% died in a non-institutional setting. In the last 180 days of life, 84% of time was spent at home, and once enrolled in hospice, 97% of time was spent outside of institutional care. HBPC patients experience highly variable care trajectories but on average have reductions in acute care use and spend a majority of time in non-institutional settings. These data allow for a nuanced understanding of HBPC, providing a platform for monitoring, evaluating, and improving program function.

Relational coordination in Veterans Affairs home-based primary care

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care (HBPC) is an intensive primary care program in which interdisciplinary teams care for patients with complex, chronic medical and social needs in their homes. HBPC teams consist of multiple disciplines, perform complex, interdependent tasks, coordinate care with other providers to meet patient needs. Relational coordination (RC) is a mutually reinforcing process of communicating and relating that provides the information-processing capacity to coordinate complex, interdependent tasks. In this mixed-methods study, we examined RC within home-based primary care teams (HBPC), and between clinic-based primary care providers and HBPC team members. RC was assessed by a cross-sectional survey of 33 HBPC team members and semi-structured interviews with 14 HBPC and 10 clinic-based PCPs were conducted to explicate findings. Survey results showed strong RC within HBPC teams but gaps in timely communication and shared knowledge among HBPC teams and clinic-based PCPs. These gaps may underlie confusion and frustration over the role of HBPC and what types of patients should get HBPC care. Interview data suggest that functional specialization and lack of face-to-face interactions may have hindered the development of strong RC. Interventions that promote boundary spanning may improve RC between HBPC teams and clinic based primary care.

Managing Social Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from US Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Veterans and Caregivers

The COVID-19 pandemic proved especially devastating for older adults who are primarily homebound, as well as their caregivers. The objective of this study was to describe how United States (US) Veterans—and their caregivers—who receive care from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) program managed increased social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We designed a qualitative study and conducted phone interviews with Veterans and their caregivers receiving VA HBPC care, interviewing N = 44 Veterans and caregivers from eight VA HBPC programs across the US. We audio recorded and transcribed all interview data and applied an inductive and deductive approach to thematic analysis to analysis. The following themes emerged illustrating how Veterans and caregivers managed increased isolation during the pandemic: 1) normalizing challenges; 2) caregivers struggling to manage isolation, as Veterans were accustomed to being homebound; 3) relying heavily on social support of family and/or friends and neighbors, and engaging in creative activities; and 4) those living in their own homes found increased isolation more manageable than those living in assisted living facilities. Results show HBPC Veterans & their caregivers with stronger social networks drew upon previously curated social capital to manage isolation and took a “we’re all in this together” attitude toward the pandemic. Results can inform community programs, healthcare systems, and policy makers to target efforts when creating supportive programs and policies for older adults and caregivers, especially those with smaller social support networks and those living in assisted living facilities.

Outpatient Care Fragmentation and Acute Care Utilization in Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care

Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) provides comprehensive, interdisciplinary primary care at home to patients with complex, chronic, disabling disease, but little is known about care fragmentation patterns and consequences among these patients. To examine outpatient care fragmentation patterns and subsequent acute care among HBPC-engaged patients at high risk of hospitalization or death. This retrospective cohort study included VA patients aged at least 65 years who were enrolled in the VA and Medicare, whose risk of hospitalization or death was in the top 10%, and who had at least 4 outpatient visits between October 1, 2013, and September 30, 2014. HBPC engagement was defined as having at least 2 HBPC encounters between July 1, 2014, and September 30, 2014. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to March 2022. Two indices of outpatient care fragmentation: practitioner count and the Usual Provider Continuity Index (UPC), based on VA and non-VA health care use from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014. All care delivered by HBPC clinicians was analyzed as coming from a single practitioner. Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) from VA records and Medicare claims from October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015. Among 8908 identified HBPC patients, 8606 (96.6%) were male, 1562 (17.5%) were Black, 249 (2.8%) were Hispanic, 6499 (73.0%) were White, 157 (1.8%) were other race or ethnicity, and 441 (5.0%) had unknown race or ethnicity; the mean (SD) age was 80.0 (9.02) years; patients had a mean (SD) of 11.25 (3.87) chronic conditions, and commonly had disabling conditions such as dementia (38.8% [n = 3457]). In adjusted models, a greater number of practitioners was associated with increased odds of an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]) and hospitalization for an ACSC (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06]), whereas more concentrated care with a higher UPC was associated with reduced odds of these outcomes (highest vs lowest tertile of UPC: aOR for ED visit, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.67-0.88], aOR for ACSC hospitalization, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.88]). Among patients in HBPC, fragmented care was associated with more ED visits and ACSC hospitalizations. These findings suggest that consolidating or coordinating fragmented care may be a target for reducing preventable acute care.

COVID-19 Vaccination in VA Home Based Primary Care: Experience of Interdisciplinary Team Members.

ObjectivesDescribe how Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) team members discussed the COVID-19 vaccine with Veteran patients and their caregivers; describe HBPC team members' experiences providing care during the pandemic; identify facilitators and barriers to vaccinating HBPC Veterans during the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignOnline survey that included 3 open-ended COVID-19 vaccine-related questions.Setting and ParticipantsHBPC Program Directors from 145 VA Medical Centers were invited to participate and share the survey invitation with team members. The survey was open from March to May 2021. We collected N = 573 surveys from 73 sites.MethodsWe analyzed demographic data using descriptive frequencies and open-ended questions using thematic analysis.ResultsRespondents from all HBPC roles were included in the study: Registered Nurses, Psychologists, Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners, Social Workers, Dieticians, Occupational Therapists, Pharmacists, Physical Therapists, HBPC Program Directors, HBPC Medical Directors, MDs, Physician Assistants, Other. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed 3 themes describing VA HBPC team members' experiences discussing and administering the COVID-19 vaccine: communication and education, advocating for prioritization of HBPC Veterans to receive the vaccine, and logistics of delivering and administering the vaccine.Conclusions and ImplicationsOur study findings highlight the multifaceted experiences of VA HBPC team members discussing and administering initial doses of the COVID-19 vaccine to primarily homebound Veterans. Although the VA's HBPC program offers an example of a singular health care system, insights from more than 70 sites from across the United States reveal key lessons around the internal and external structures required to successfully support programs and their staff in providing these key activities. These lessons include proactively addressing the needs of homebound populations in national vaccine rollouts and developing vaccine education and training programs for HBPC team members specifically aligned to HBPC program needs. These lessons can extend to non-VA organizations who care for similar homebound populations.

Adaptations to In-Home Health Care Due to COVID-19: The VA’s Home-Based Primary Care Program

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) care processes, including changes to provision of face-to-face care in-home for older adults. Our study describes and explains care delivery changes Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) HBPC programs made in response to the pandemic. We fielded a national survey to all 140 VA HBPC programs, targeting interdisciplinary care teams and HBPC leadership. We structured survey questions using a mixed method approach with both closed and open-ended questions, applying a qualitative content analysis approach to open-ended responses complemented by analysis of descriptive quantitative data. Preliminary findings highlight the value and consideration of different telehealth modalities when caring for an older, homebound population, as well as creative adaptations HBPC teams made to deliver care during the pandemic. Implications include nascent development of decision-making paradigms beyond the pandemic particularly for appropriate use of telehealth modalities for older homebound adults.

Impact of Social Isolation Due to COVID-19 on VA Home-Based Primary Care Veterans and Caregivers

In December 2020 we began conducting phone interviews with Veterans, and their caregivers, receiving care through the United Sates (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) program. Our goal was to describe experiences of Veterans and caregivers managing changes in care delivery related to the COVID-19 pandemic and navigating increased social isolation due to social distancing. We interviewed 38 Veterans (average age 78) and caregivers (average age 62) across seven VA HBPC programs. Findings showed those living in their own homes found increased isolation more manageable than those living in assisted living facilities, which restricted visitors. Caregivers had a harder time managing isolation than Veterans, as Veterans were used to being primarily homebound. Veterans and caregivers relied on increased phone communication with their HBPC teams, with some began participating in virtual visits. Implications include insights into better supporting older, homebound adults and their caregivers during disasters.

Family reports of end-of-life care among veterans in home-based primary care: The role of hospice.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)'s home-based primary care (HBPC) program provides coordinated, interdisciplinary care to seriously ill and disabled veterans, but few evaluations have considered end-of-life (EOL) care in this population. The aim of this study was to describe veterans' use of community-based hospice services while enrolled in HBPC and their associations with bereaved families' perceptions of care. This study was a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record and bereaved family survey (BFS) data for veterans who died while enrolled in VA's HBPC program between October 2013 and September 2019. Seven regional VA networks called Veteran Integrated Service Networks participated in BFS data collection. The final sample included 3967 veterans who were receiving HBPC services at the time of death and whose next-of-kin completed a BFS. The primary outcome was the BFS global rating of care received in the last 30 days of life. Adjusted proportions for all BFS outcomes were examined and compared between those who received community-based hospice services and those who did not. Overall, 52.6% of BFS respondents reported that the care received by HBPC-enrolled veterans in the last 30 days of life was excellent using the BFS global rating. Among families of HBPC-enrolled veterans who received community-based hospice services, the BFS global rating was roughly eight percentage points higher than those who did not (55.7 vs. 47.0%, p < 0.001). On 12 of the 14 secondary BFS outcomes, veterans who received hospice scored higher than those who did not. Receipt of hospice services while enrolled in HBPC was associated with higher ratings of EOL care by bereaved family members. Integration of community hospice partners for qualifying veterans who are enrolled in the HBPC program represents a potential opportunity to improve the overall experience of EOL care for veterans and their families.

VA home-based primary care interdisciplinary team structure varies with Veterans' needs, aligns with PACE regulation.

Interdisciplinary team (IDT) care is central to home-based primary care (HBPC) of frail elders. Traditionally, all HBPC disciplines managed a patient (Full IDT), a costly approach to maintain. The recent PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly) regulation provides for a flexible approach of annual assessments from a core team with involvement of additional disciplines dependent upon patient needs (Core+). Current Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) HBPC guidance specifies Full IDTs care for medically complex and functionally impaired Veterans similar to PACE participants. We evaluated whether VA HBPC has adopted the flexible structure of the PACE regulation, aligned to Veteran needs. Cross-sectional analysis. All 139 VA HBPC programs administered across 379 sites. About 55,173 Veterans enrolled in HBPC during fiscal year 2018. Patients' HBPC physician, nurse, psychologist/psychiatrist, social worker, therapist, dietitian, and pharmacist visits were grouped into interdisciplinary team types. Patient frailty was classified using VA HNHR v2 (High-Need High-Risk version 2, a measure of high, medium, and low risk of long-term institutionalization). Medical complexity was measured by clusters of impairment in the JEN frailty index (JFI). JFI clusters were validated by VA's Nosos measure to project cost and Care Assessment Need (CAN) measure of hospitalization and mortality risk. HBPC provided Full IDT care to 21%, Core+ care to 54%, and Home Health+ (HHA+) care (skilled home health services plus additional disciplines, without primary care) to 16% of Veterans. Team type was associated with medical complexity (X2 2863.5 [66 df], p < 0.0001). High-risk Veterans (72% of sample) were more likely to receive Full IDT care (X2 62.9, 1 df), p < 0.0001), while low-risk Veterans (28%) were more likely to receive HHA+ care (X2 314.8, 1 df, p < 0.0001). There is a strong association between HBPC team patterns and patient frailty, indicating tailoring of care to match Veteran needs.

Factors Associated With Hospitalization by Veterans in Home-Based Primary Care

ObjectivesThis study examined the extent to which program site-based and Veteran characteristics were associated with potentially avoidable hospitalizations or other hospitalization of Veterans enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC). DesignRetrospective claims-based study. Setting and ParticipantsHBPC programs that responded to a national survey of HBPC programs (n = 189) in fiscal year (FY) 2016 were studied. Veterans in the analysis cohort were identified as having been enrolled in VA-HBPC in FY2016 who had not received care by VA-HBPC within 1 year prior to their first HBPC enrollment in FY2016 (N = 8497). MethodsMultinomial logistic regression analysis with 5 outcome categories within the 6 months following the first HBPC enrollment date: (1) any potentially avoidable hospitalizations for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSC) as identified by AHRQ Prevention Quality Indicator (PQI), (2) any other hospitalizations for non-ACSC conditions, (3) died during study period, (4) discharged from HBPC, or (5) remained at home with HBPC. Average marginal effects (AME) of veteran-level and VA-HBPC-level covariates are reported for each of the outcome categories. ResultsMore frail Veterans and Veterans 85 years old or older were more likely to have potentially preventable ACSC hospitalizations (AME = 5.4%, 1.8%, respectively). Veterans who were younger than 75 years, functionally impaired, bed-bound, or frail were more likely to have non-ACSC hospitalization (AME = 3.0%, 2.2%, 3.5%, and 9.0%, respectively). Veterans with low frailty index scores were less likely to have non-ACSC hospitalizations (AME = −17.1%). Six-month hospitalization patterns were not associated with reported HBPC site characteristics. Conclusions and ImplicationsWithin the framework of the national VA HBPC program, variations in the structural model used at HBPC sites are not significantly associated with hospitalizations. Tailoring of HBPC care, based on individual patient factors and clinical judgment rather than standard protocols, may be central to the success of HBPC in reducing ACSC hospitalizations.

"Eyes in the Home": Addressing Social Complexity in Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care.

Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) has demonstrated success in decreasing risk of hospitalization and improving patient satisfaction through patient targeting and integrating long-term services and supports. Less is known about how HBPC teams approach social factors. Describe HBPC providers' knowledge of social complexity among HBPC patients and how this knowledge impacts care delivery. Between 2018 and 2019, we conducted in-person semi-structured interviews with 14 HBPC providers representing nursing, medicine, physical therapy, pharmacy, and psychology, at an urban Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. We also conducted field observations of 6 HBPC team meetings and 2 home visits. We employed an exploratory, content-driven approach to qualitative data analysis. Four thematic categories were identified: (1) HBPC patients are socially isolated and have multiple layers of medical and social complexity that compromise their ability to use clinic-based care; (2) providers having "eyes in the home" yields essential information not accessible in outpatient clinics; (3) HBPC fills gaps in instrumental support, many of which are not medical; and (4) addressing social complexity requires a flexible care design that HBPC provides. HBPC providers emphasized the importance of having "eyes in the home" to observe and address the care needs of homebound Veterans who are older, socially isolated, and have functional limitations. Patient selection criteria and discharge recommendations for a resource-intensive program like VA HBPC should include considerations for the compounding effects of medical and social complexity. Additionally, staffing that provides resources for these effects should be integrated into HBPC programming.

Development of a Suicide Prevention Toolkit for VA Home-Based Primary Care Teams.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care program (HBPC) serves Veterans with multiple comorbid physical and psychological conditions that can increase suicide risk. HBPC teams are uniquely able to implement suicide risk assessment and prevention practices, and the team's mental health provider often trains other team members. An online suicide prevention toolkit was developed for HBPC mental health providers and their teams as part of a quality improvement project. Toolkit development was guided by a needs assessment consisting of first focus group and then data from surveys of HBPC program directors (n = 53) and HBPC mental health providers (n = 56). Needs identified by both groups included training specific to the HBPC patient population and more resources if mental health needs could not be fully managed by the HBPC team. HBPC mental health providers within integrated care teams play a key role in clinical intervention, policy development, and interprofessional team education on suicide prevention. HBPC teams have specific learning and support needs around suicide prevention that can be addressed with a feasible, easily accessible clinical and training resource.

Preparedness and Response Activities of the VA Home-Based Primary Care Program Around the Fall 2017 Hurricane Season

Individuals aged seventy-five or older, who often present with multiple comorbidities and decreased functional status, typically prefer to age in their homes. Additionally, as in-home medical equipment evolves, more medically vulnerable individuals can receive care at home. Concomitantly, large-scale natural disasters disproportionally affect both the medically complex and the older old, two patient groups responsible for most medical surge after a disaster. To understand how to ameliorate this surge, we examined the activities of the nine US Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care programs during the 2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season. These and similar programs under Medicare connect the homebound to the healthcare community. Study findings support early implementation of preparedness procedures and intense post-Hurricane patient tracking as a means of limiting reductions in care and preventing significant disruptions to patient health. Engaging with home-based primary care programs during disasters is central to bolstering community resilience for these at-risk populations.

Preparedness and response activities of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home-based primary care program around the fall 2017 hurricane season

BackgroundLarge-scale natural disasters disproportionally affect both the medically complex and the older old, groups that are responsible for most medical surge after a disaster. To understand how to ameliorate this surge, we examined the activities of the nine US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs impacted during the 2017 Fall Hurricane Season.MethodsConvergent mixed methods design, incorporating independently conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses. Phase One: 34 clinical staff were interviewed from the nine VA HBPC programs impacted by Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria to examine the experiences of their HBPC programs in response to the Hurricanes. Phase Two: Secondary quantitative data analysis used the VA’s Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) to examine the electronic health records of patients for these same nine sites.ResultsThe emergency management activities of the HBPC programs emerged as two distinct phases: preparedness, and response and recovery. The early implementation of preparedness procedures, and coordinated post-Hurricane patient tracking, limited disruption in care and prevented significant hospitalizations among this population.ConclusionsIndividuals aged 75 or older, who often present with multiple comorbidities and decreased functional status, typically prefer to age in their homes. Additionally, as in-home medical equipment evolves, more medically vulnerable individuals are able to receive care at home. HBPC programs, and similar programs under Medicare, connect the homebound, medically complex, older old to the greater healthcare community. Engaging with these programs both pre- and post-disasters is central to bolstering community resilience for these at-risk populations.

Benchmarking Site of Death and Hospice Use: A Case Study of Veterans Cared by Department of Veterans Affairs Home-based Primary Care.

The objective of this study was to examine site of death and hospice use, identifying potential disparities among veterans dying in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home Based Primary Care (VA-HBPC). Administrative data (2008, 2012, and 2016) were compiled using the VA Residential-History-File which tracks health care service location, daily. Outcomes were site of death [home, nursing home (NH), hospital, inpatient hospice]; and hospice use on the day of death. We compared VA-HBPC rates to rates of 2 decedent benchmarks: VA patients and 5% Traditional Medicare non-veteran males. Potential age, race, urban/rural residence and living alone status disparities in rates among veterans dying in VA-HBPC in 2016 were examined by multinomial logistic regression. In 2016, 7796 veterans died in VA-HBPC of whom 62.1% died at home, 11.8% in NHs, 14.7% in hospitals and 11.4% in inpatient hospice. Hospice was provided to 60.9% of veterans dying at home and 63.9% of veterans dying in NH. Over the 2008-2012-2016 period, rates of VA-HBPC veterans who died at home and rates of home death with hospice increased and were higher than both benchmarks. Among VA-HBPC decedents, younger/older veterans were more/less likely to die at home and less/more likely to die with hospice. Race/ethnicity and urban/rural residence were unrelated to death at home but veterans living alone were less likely to die at home. Results reflect VA-HBPC's primary goal of supporting its veterans at home, including at the end-of-life, surpassing other population benchmarks with some potential disparities remaining.

Dedicated to the Mission: Strategies US Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care Teams Apply to Keep Veterans at Home.

The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Program provides interdisciplinary, long-term primary care for frail, disabled, or chronically ill veterans. This research identifies strategies used by HBPC teams to support veterans in their homes, rather than in institutionalized care. Focus groups and semistructured interviews were conducted with HBPC interdisciplinary team (IDT) members, including program directors, medical directors, and key staff, from September 2017 to March 2018. Field observations were gathered during visits to veterans' homes and IDT meetings. In-person site visits were conducted at eight HBPC Programs across the United States. Sites varied in location, setting, and primary care model. A total of 105 HBPC professionals. Qualitative thematic content analysis. Four main strategies drive and support the shared mission of IDTs to support veterans at home: fostering frequent communication among IDT members, veterans, caregivers, and outside agencies; development of longitudinal, trusting, reliable relationships within IDTs and with veterans and caregivers; ongoing, consistent education for IDT members and veterans and caregivers; and collaboration within and outside IDTs. Adhering to this mission meant providing timely and efficient care that kept veterans in their homes and minimized the need for acute hospitalizations and nursing home placement. HBPC IDTs studied worked together across disciplines to effectively create a dedicated culture of caring for veterans, caregivers, and themselves, leading to keeping veterans at home. Focusing on the strategies identified in this research may be useful to achieve similar positive outcomes when caring for medically complex, homebound patients within and outside the VA. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2511-2518, 2019.

ACT Now: The Intersection of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with Palliative Care in a Veteran with Chronic Suicidal Ideation

ABSTRACTSuicide rates are increasing in the United States and groups at elevated risk include older adults, veterans, and those with life-limiting illnesses. However, the treatment of suicidality at end-of-life has been little studied. There is emerging evidence that palliative care itself may be protective against suicide and there is some support for the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) at end-of-life. The overlapping mechanisms of palliative care and ACT are especially well-suited for individuals struggling with suicidality in the context of life-limiting illness.A case from a Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) team is used to illustrate the challenges and opportunities when providing end-of-life care to an older veteran with chronic suicidal ideation. Prior mental health treatment had limited impact on his suicidality. However, with an integrated ACT and palliative care approach, the HBPC team was better able to focus on the veteran’s goals. This approach was helpful in reducing suicidal ideation and engaging him in end-of-life decision-making discussions. This case highlights the valuable role of palliative care in suicide prevention and how the addition of ACT can aid in the effective treatment of chronic suicidal ideation at the end-of-life.

Interdisciplinary Team Perspectives on Mental Health Care in VA Home-Based Primary Care: A Qualitative Study

This qualitative study describes the structure and processes of providing care to U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) enrollees with mental health care needs; explains the role of the HBPC psychologist; and describes how mental health treatment is integrated into care from the perspective of HBPC team members. HBPC programs were selected for in-person site visits based on initial surveys and low hospitalization rates. Programs varied in setting, geographic locations, and primary care model. Eight site visits were completed. During visits, key informants including HBPC program directors, medical directors, team members, and other key staff involved with the HBPC program participated in semi-structured individual and group interviews. Recorded interviews, focus groups, and field observation notes. Qualitative thematic content analysis revealed four themes: 1) HBPC Veterans have not only complex physical needs but also co-occurring mental health needs; 2) the multi-faceted role of psychologists on HBPC teams, that includes providing care for Veterans and support for colleagues; 3) collaboration between medical and mental health providers as a means of caring for HBPC Veterans with mental health needs; and 4) gaps in providing mental health care on HBPC teams, primarily related to a lack of team psychiatrists and/or need for specialized medication management for psychiatric illness. Mental health providers are essential to HBPC teams. Given the significant mental health care needs of HBPC enrollees and the roles of HBPC mental health providers, HBPC teams should integrate both psychologists and consulting psychiatrists.

Key Characteristics for Successful Adoption and Implementation of Home Telehealth Technology in Veterans Affairs Home-Based Primary Care: An Exploratory Study.

The Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) program provides care to over 37,000 high-risk, high-need, medically complex, and costly patients in their home. The VA's Home Telehealth (HT) program can potentially amplify HBPC's efficiency and reach, yet scarce data on use and experience with HT in HBPC exist. This exploratory study sought to provide a glimpse of HT use in HBPC and identify drivers and barriers for HT implementation. National VA data were used to evaluate HBPC patients concurrently using HT. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of HBPC program directors to explore HT use, understand communication processes, and elicit open comments. Semistructured interviews were conducted of 18 HBPC program directors with varying HT use to clarify themes and understand HBPC experience with HT. Fifteen percent of the overall HBPC patients used HT in 2011, with a wide variation in HT use by HBPC site. The national survey and semistructured interviews revealed that most HBPC staff recognized advantages of using HT, including increased patient engagement and staff efficiency. Crucial practices among sites with successful telehealth adoption included HT staff attending HBPC meetings and evaluating all HBPC patients for HT. Much remains to be done for effective HT integration in HBPC. Improving communication between HT and HBPC programs and establishing a system for identifying suitable patients for HT are vital. Future studies need to delineate operational processes and gather data on the added value of HT in HBPC to guide evidence-based integration of HT in VA and Medicare HBPC programs.