Vertical Alveolar Distraction Research Articles

Installation of dental implants in distracted anterior alveolar bone

Purpose This study was planned to evaluate the success of dental implants installed in distracted alveolar bone using extra-osseous vertical distractor. Patients and methods This is a prospective noncontrolled clinical study that was carried out on eight patients with age range from 20 to 50 years old who complained from vertical alveolar defect in anterior area and underwent vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis using extra-osseous distractor device followed by implant installation. Results Clinically there was a significant increase in vertical height of alveolar bone after distraction at P value of 0.007. Radiographically, by cone-beam computed tomography there was a significant increase in alveolar bone height and implants installed in distracted anterior alveolar bone were successful. Conclusion Alveolar distraction osteogenesis was a predictable method for restoring alveolar ridge height prior to implant placement. Distraction osteogenesis is ideally suited for recreating missing tissues in the anterior esthetic zone. The bone gain reached at the end of distraction appears to be lasting.

Alveolar ridge augmentation in mandible by use the modified distractor.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the horizontal and the vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis using modified alveolar distractor.Study design: The sample consisted of 7 patients presenting horizontally and vertically deficient edentulous ridges were treated by distraction osteogenesis with a modified Alveolar distractor. The surgical procedure was carried out with the patient under local anesthesia. After the osteotomy was performed with pizosurgery, the distractor was placed on the segmental bone over the gingiva for 3 months. The rate of distraction was 0.5 mm/twice a day.Results: The mean of horizontal alveolar before using the distractor was 4.70 mm (SD 0.31 mm) The mean of horizontal alveolar after using the distractor was 8.30 mm (Sd 0.59 mm). The mean of actual gain in bone horizontal at the end of the distraction period was 3.58 mm (SD 0.15 mm). The mean of height alveolar before using the distractor was 6.67 mm (SD 0.46 mm) The mean of height alveolar after using the distractor was 12.59 mm (SD 0.52 mm). The mean of actual gain in bone height at the end of the distraction period was 5.92 mm (SD 0.25 mm).Conclusion: It was concluded that the modified alveolar distractor seems to be an effective to treat horizontal and vertical alveolar ridge deficiencies, and distraction osteogenesis can be considered a safe and effective procedure for gaining bone in the horizontal and the vertical dimension of the alveolar.

Does the Animal Model Influence in Vertical Alveolar Distraction? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Simple SummaryVertical alveolar osteogenesis distraction (VAOD) technique appears to provide the best results in terms of vertical bone gain. Before its use in humans, most devices are tested on experimental animals. Currently, there is no consensus on which is the ideal biological animal model for VAOD studies. In this review, it has been found that the animal model influences the results. In addition, the most used, easier to handle, and with less complications was the Mongrel dog. The use of pigs and minipigs, given their difficult handling and poor hygiene, is not recommended.This study is aimed at synthesizing all available evidence on vertical alveolar osteogenesis distraction (VAOD) in animal trials to determine whether the animal model used and its handling influence or not, and find which is the most appropriate animal model for this specific technique. This systematic review has been carried out following the PRISMA statements. Bibliographic sources have been consulted manually by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using a version of the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale (NOS). The selection criteria established by expert researchers were applied in order to decide which studies should be included in the review. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Twenty-four of them had a high quality (score between 7 and 9), two medium quality (score between 4 and 6), and none low quality (score between 1 and 3). The highest possible score was 9 (using the NOS). Six studies complied with all NOS criteria. The animal model has been seen to influence the results, leading to failure in some cases. The most used animal model on VAOD, with fewer complications, was the Mongrel dog. The use of the pig and minipig is not recommended, due to the difficulties in handling and complications encountered.

Comparing the duration of different phases of vertical alveolar distraction between ultrasound treated and control group in anterior mandible

Comparing the duration of different phases of vertical alveolar distraction between ultrasound treated and control group in anterior mandible

Horizontal alveolar transport distraction osteogenesis followed by implant placement

Alveolar transport distraction osteogenesis (ATDO) is an alternative treatment method to vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis in cases of large bony defects, especially when the bone is limited in size. ATDO was performed in 10 patients with 12 defects. The mean age of the patients was 39.1years. The average bone length gain was 18.2mm. Implants were inserted following a 3-month consolidation period. Three patients needed additional bone grafting for horizontal widening. Final prosthetic rehabilitation was performed at least 3 months following implant insertion. The mean follow-up period was 63 months and the survival rate of the 25 implants placed was 92%. All failures (n=2) occurred during the early healing period. Although the results are not totally predictable, it can be concluded that ATDO can be effective in the reconstruction of the alveolar crest prior to implant placement.

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant treatments of the vertical bone atrophy: A systematic review.

BackgroundTo determine if alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis obtains better results compared to other bone regeneration treatments (guided bone regeneration with membranes and / or filling material, or autogenous bone graft) in terms of bone gain, complications, and implant survival and success rates.Material and MethodsAn electronic search was performed in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library and Scopus databases in March 2017. Besides, a manual search was carried out. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials published within the last 10 years with at least 1 year of follow-up after implant placement. No language restriction was applied. Exclusion criteria were studies in patients with bone defects produced by trauma, congenital malformation or oncologic surgical treatment. The methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated by means of the Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for assessing risk of bias. The reports were classified into different levels of recommendation according to the “Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy “.ResultsOut of 221 articles, two randomized controlled trials were finally selected for the inclusion in the systematic review. Bone gain and complications were higher with the alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis compared to the autologous bone graft. There was higher bone resorption with the autologous bone graft. Implant survival and success rates were similar between studies, despite of the used technique.ConclusionsBoth alveolar distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone graft are effective bone regeneration techniques for the treatment of mandibular vertical bone atrophy. A level B recommendation can be established for the use of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of the mandibular vertical bone atrophy. Key words:Distraction osteogenesis, alveolar ridge augmentation, alveolar bone loss.

20 years of alveolar distraction: A systematic review of the literature.

BackgroundThe Vertical Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis (VADO) technique is an excellent solution for bone and soft tissue neoformation in areas in which there has been significant bone atrophy that hinders normal rehabilitation using dental implants. The goal of this systematic review is to analyze the most relevant articles published on VADO in the literature over the past 20 years.Material and MethodsThe review was performed by using the keywords: “alveolar ridge”, “distraction ostegenesis” and “dental implant”. This search produced a total result of 240 articles. The clinical studies and cases reported in humans amounted to 113 articles, 18 articles referred to studies developed on animals and 33 review articles. The presentation of this systematic analysis follows the criteria described in the PRISMA declaration.Results22 articles complied with the inclusion criteria and 7 articles more were added manually, reaching a total sample of 29 studies. Following the analysis of the studies, they were classified into 18 high-quality, 10 mediumquality and 1 low-quality study. Only 4 studies achieved a maximum score of 9 (according to NewCastle Ottawa Scale, NOS).Conclusions VADO is a technique with greater potential in vertical gain. The performance of dental implants has a success and survival rate similar to dental implants placed on bones that are not subject to increase techniques. Key words:Vertical distraction osteogenesis, alveolar ridge, distraction osteogenesis, dental implant.

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Post-Traumatic Deficient Anterior Maxilla

Maxillary retrognathism appears in 14.3% of patients exhibiting malocclusion after trauma treatment. This report describes the application of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) for treating the severely deficient anterior maxilla after trauma injuries in the vertical and anteroposterior planes. This is a retrospective study of patients exhibiting severe vertical and anteroposterior maxillary bone deficiency after trauma injuries and treated by ADO as a first stage with additional Le Fort I advancement when required. Predictor variables included ADO for alveolar augmentation and Le Fort I advancement for anteroposterior discrepancy after ADO. Outcome variables included dental implant failure and anteroposterior maxillary relations. Twelve patients with severe atrophic anterior maxilla secondary to trauma injuries were included and treated using ADO. In accordance to the size of the horizontal deficiency, 1 or 2 distractors were used. Vertical alveolar distraction was performed and the transported segments were elongated at a rate of 0.5mm/day to a mean total of 13.9mm (12 to 15mm). In 4 of 12 cases, there was a severe anteroposterior discrepancy larger than 8mm that could not be fully corrected using an anterior inclination during the vertical elongation. Therefore, a second stage of conventional Le Fort I advancement was performed. Thirty-eight dental implants were inserted, with a survival rate of 97.37% (median follow-up, 6.2yr). This report describes treatment of the deficient anterior maxilla after trauma injuries in the vertical and anteroposterior planes, including implant-based dental rehabilitation. The main advantages include simultaneous bone and mucosa augmentation, no donor site morbidity, considerably higher vertical augmentation compared with other methods, and minimal relapse. Using an additional Le Fort I advancement in severe cases permits a useful method for proper repositioning of the maxilla, thus resulting in superior intermaxillary relations.

Vertical Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis of the Atrophic Posterior Mandible Before Dental Implant Insertion

Augmentation of deficient mandibular posterior alveolar ridges poses a great challenge because of extensive bone deficiency and the presence of the inferior alveolar nerve. This study sets its focus on vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) at the posterior mandible before dental implant placement. The study included 21 sites in 18 patients with severe mandibular posterior alveolar ridge deficiency. A trapezoidal osteotomy was performed, and an extraosseous alveolar distraction device was fixed and activated after a 4-day latency period at a rate of 0.5mm/day. After a 4-month retention period, the distraction device was removed and titanium dental implants were placed. A mean vertical augmentation of 14.47mm was gained. The newly formed bone was shown using panoramic radiography and computed tomography. We placed 56 dental implants, and during a minimum follow-up period of 36months, 2 implants were lost, resulting in a success rate of 96.42%. ADO offers marked vertical ridge augmentation with simultaneous soft tissue expansion and stable results. ADO diminishes the need for autogenous bone graft, thus sparing donor-site morbidity. ADO of the deficient posterior mandibular alveolar ridge is useful in moderate to severe bony deficiencies and allows for adequate bone formation, which allows implant insertion.

Efficacy of Alveolar Vertical Distraction Osteogenesis and Autogenous Bone Grafting for Dental Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting in terms of bone gain, bone resorption, and implant survival and success rates and investigate the relationship between bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis. A systematic search was done using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed from inception to April 30, 2014. Supplementary manual searches of published full-text articles were also performed. Searches of four electronic databases and manual searches resulted in 1,538 articles. After selection, four studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The difference in bone gain at the end of distraction or bone grafting was statistically significant (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.86, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.69, P = .05; heterogeneity: I(2) = 78%, P = .01). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting (WMD 0.30, 95% CI -0.99 to 1.59, P = .065). Bone resorption between the end of treatment and the time of implant placement was not statistically significant (WMD -0.12, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.85, P = .80; heterogeneity: I(2) = 78%, P = .01). A simple equation related to bone gain and resorption after alveolar vertical distraction was induced from these results. There was not a statistically significant difference between alveolar distraction osteogenesis and onlay bone grafting in terms of bone gain and bone resorption.

Flapless Piezotome-Enhanced Vertical Alveolar Crest-Split and Horizontal Distraction of Alveolar Crests (FPeCSWT) of Less than 2 mm Width: Results of a Prospective Comparative 3-Year Clinical Multicenter-Study with 239 Patients, 261 Crest-Split Sites and 488 Inserted Dental Implants

Alveolar crest-splitting and horizontal distraction is an established surgical technique to enable implant insertion into the narrow, lateral atrophic alveolar crest. This surgical technique is challenging for the oral surgeon and restricted to crest-widths of 3 - 5 mm: significant procedural bone loss at osteotomy, the need to prepare a full thickness mucoperiostal flap and milling a baseline-osteotomy to weaken the bone for distraction inhere significant risks of accidental fractures. Aim of the study was to investigate if the recently developed novel Flapless Piezotome enhanced Crest-Splitting and Widening Technique (FPeCSWT) could safely narrow down the indication for this procedure to narrow alveolar crests of widths of even less than 2 mm in a three-year survey-period. 239 patients underwent 261 FPeCSWT-surgeries and 488 implants were inserted simultaneously in the upper and the lower jaw and clinical parameters such as intrasurgical complications, patient morbidity, implant loss and vertical bone loss (VBL) in the first three years after surgeries were recorded comparing sites with less than 2 mm width with sites of more than 2 mm. After three years a significant difference (p = 0.24) of VBL could be observed between the group with less than 2 mm crest-width (mean: 0.97 mm, max: 2.0 mm/min: 0.0 mm; SD: 0.41) compared with the group with more than 2 mm crest-width (mean: 0.69 mm, max: 1.5 mm/min: 0.0 mm; SD: 0.36) but was still significant lower when compared with the results of similar studies published with a mucoperiostal-flap approach and baseline bone-cut. The cumulative 3-year-implant-survival-rate was 98.8%, no accidental fracture of the distracted buccal bone-plate occurred. The re-sults of the study suggest that the FPeCSWT narrows safely down the indication for crest-splitting to also crest-widths of only 1 mm. The procedure is highly predictable and significantly reduces the challenge of surgical skills and leads to negligible patient-morbidity. The higher VBL in crest-widths of less than 2 mm can easily be compensated by subcrestal placement of implants.

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Large Secondary Alveolar Cleft by Two-Stage Distraction

Our aim is to demonstrate a method for reconstruction of a wide alveolar cleft before implant placement. An adult patient with a unilateral cleft palate and a wide alveolar and maxillary bone defect underwent transport distraction osteogenesis to medialize the left segment and reduce the alveolar cleft to a minimum. Removal of the transport distraction device was accompanied by autogenous bone grafting to the remaining alveolar defect in the medial cleft, attaining an osseous closure with adequate soft-tissue coverage. Three months later, vertical alveolar distraction of the newly reconstructed bone was performed. Implants were placed after the removal of the distraction device. Alveolar bone was transported forward 20 mm followed by 15 mm vertical distraction. The large cleft palate defect was reconstructed in three dimensions by the two-stage distraction osteogenesis, and the soft tissues were expanded to achieve functional correction. After removal of the distraction device, dental implants were osteointegrated in the newly reconstructed bone for fixed dental rehabilitation. The two-stage distraction allowed gradual closure of a large defect three dimensionally. This method can be safely performed not only in patients undergoing initial treatment for large alveolar clefts but also after failed bone grafting.

Rehabilitation of Edentulous Atrophic Anterior Mandible – The Role of Vertical Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis

The rehabilitation of patients with edentulous alveolar ridge is always a challenge, more so in case of a long standing atrophic mandible. Mandible, the largest movable bone in the maxillofacial skeleton is associated with many soft tissue attachments which imparts dislodging forces to prosthesis. In addition to this, the rate of resorption of the mandibular ridge is four times that of the maxilla. These factors make the environment of the mandibular arch less favorable to complete denture stability and retention. An ideal solution would be to augment the atrophic alveolar ridge with native bone of the individual which shall eliminate the possible complications, associated with conventional ridge augmentation procedures. With advent of modern technology, and increased biological understanding, the principles of distraction osteogenesis are increasingly being applied to the craniofacial skeleton and have been found to be a viable option in augmenting the native alveolar bone in the mandible. Here the application of an indigenous stainless steel vertical alveolar distraction device to augment atrophic anterior mandibular ridge is assessed in six patients.

Evaluation of Vertical Bone Gain Following Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis in the Anterior Edentulous Mandible: A Clinical Study.

To calculate the gain in bony height and volume of the distracted upper segment using an extraosseous unidirectional device to improve the retention of the future prosthesis. Ten cases with completely or partially edentulous but severely or considerably resorbed anterior mandibles were managed by vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis. All the patients were evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively and post-operatively for various parameters clinically and radiographically i.e. on OPG, lateral cephalogram and on CT scan, at different time intervals. In all cases there was increase in vertical bone height. The study showed mean vertical bone gain (VBG) on OPG as 8.2mm. The mean VBG on lateral cephalogram was 8.1mm. The mean VBG on CT scan at right canine was 8.35mm, at left canine was 8.2mm and at midline was 8.27mm. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis is a predictable method for restoring alveolar ridges prior to implant placement or prosthesis. Distraction osteogenesis is ideally suited for recreating missing tissue in the anterior esthetic zone by increasing vertical bone height as well as good width and soft tissue growth.

Oral and dental restoration of wide alveolar cleft using distraction osteogenesis and temporary anchorage devices

Closure of large alveolar clefts and restoration by a fixed bridge supported by implants is a challenge in cleft alveolus treatment. A major aesthetic concern with distraction osteogenesis is obtaining a predictable position of the implant in relation to the newly generated bony alveolar ridge. We describe the treatment of a large cleft alveolus and palate reconstruction by distraction osteogenesis utilizing temporary anchorage devices (TADs) followed by a fixed implant-supported bridge. The method consists of segmental bone transport by distraction osteogenesis using a bone-borne distractor to minimize the alveolar cleft, followed by closure of the residual small defect by bone grafting three months later. During the active transport distraction, TADs were used exerting multidirectional forces to control the distraction vector forward and laterally for better interarch relation. A vertical alveolar distraction of the newly reconstructed bone of 15 mm facilitated optimal implant placement. The endosseous implants were osteointegrated and supported a fixed dental prosthesis.In conclusion, the large cleft alveolus defect was repaired in three dimensions by distraction osteogenesis assisted by TADs, and the soft tissues expanded simultaneously. Endosseous implants were introduced in the newly reconstructed bone for a fixed dental prosthesis enabling, rehabilitation of aesthetics, eating and speaking.

Potential complications and precautions in vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A retrospective study of 40 patients

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the outcome of 44 cases of vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis (ADO) and to investigate the complications, precautions, and treatment associated with ADO. The 44 alveolar distractions were performed on 40 patients. Extraosseous distraction was used in all cases. Complications associated with the intraoperative, postoperative, distraction, and consolidation periods were recorded and evaluated. Intraoperative complications were noted in two patients (4.5%) where fracture of the basal bone was evident. Three (6.8%) complications were recorded postoperatively, and 12 (27.3%) complications were recorded during the activation period. During the consolidation period, 4.5% of the patients (n = 2) were affected. The total prevalence of complications was 43.2% (n = 19), and the success rate of the ADO was 95.5%. Most complications occurred in the anterior mandibular region. Although complications associated with vertical ADO were not rare, the use of this procedure for maxillofacial defects results in satisfactory outcomes. Early diagnosis and management of related complications are crucial for increasing the success rate of ADO procedures.

Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone

Introduction: Vertical osteogenic alveolar distraction (VOAD) allows for the augmentation of the alveolar ridge for the placement of dental implants in atrophic alveolar ridges. The goal of this paper is to assess long-term peri-implant bone resorption in implants placed on bones subjected to VOAD, comparing it with a group of patients who had implants placed directly on the alveolar bone without previous bone regeneration. Material and Methods: We conducted a follow-up study on 32 patients who were divided into two groups: The Distraction Group (14 patients), and the Distraction-Free Group (18 patients), who received a total of 100 implants. Peri-implant bone loss was measured by means of panoramic X-rays, at the time of loading and one year later, and in 35 implants of each group after 3 years of functional loading. Results: The peri-implant bone resorption (PBR) average observed in the Distraction Group at the time of prosthetic placement is higher (0.50±0.09 mm) than in the Distraction-Free Group (0.25±0.06 mm), showing statistically significant results (p=0.047). PBR levels 1 year after loading were the same for both groups (0.66 mm). At 3 years, they were higher in the Distraction Group (1.03 ± 0.22 mm vs. 0.68 ± 0.08 mm). Key words:Bone resorption, alveolar distraction osteogenesis, dental implants.

Vertical Alveolar Crest Split and Widening—An Experimental Study on Cow Ribs, Ultrasonic Tool Development and Test on Human Cadaver Heads

Vertical alveolar crest splitting and horizontal distraction of narrow alveolar crests is limited when rotating and low frequency oscillating tools are used due to large amounts of procedural bone loss and poor handling provisions. Aim of this study was to determine the safest osteotomy depth and to develop ultrasonic-surgery- tips to enable flapless vertical crest splitting and distraction of narrow alveolar crests of 2 mm or less. The safest osteotomy depth was determined on a cow-rib-model. To enable a flapless crest splitting and widening procedure, prototype-tips for the Piezotome-device were developed and tested against mechanical tools (widening screws and distractors) on cow-ribs, as well as their safe use in the hands of novicesurgeons on human cadaver heads. A minimum vertical osteotomy depth of 7–8 mm revealed the least fracture rates (3%). The use of the ultrasonic distraction tools showed the least risk of procedural failures (2%). Twentythree Piezotome-trainees performed the procedure with the developed tips on fresh full human cadaver skulls with a success rate of 100%. The results of this study suggest that, with the use of ultrasonic surgical devices, the indication for vertical crest-splitting can be narrowed down to a crest width of 2 mm and even less and that it can be performed flapless, thus leaving the physiological bone-periosteum system fully intact.

Effects of different consolidation periods on bone formation and implant success in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A clinical study

PurposeThe aims of this study were to compare the consolidation periods in alveolar distraction osteogenesis and evaluate the effects of this condition on bone formation, bone relapse and implant success in reconstruction of resorbed edentulous mandibles. Patients and methodsEighteen patients were underwent vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis under the same distraction protocol, except for variations in consolidation time. After a consolidation period of 5 weeks for Group 1 and 14 weeks for Group 2, 36 implants were placed to support their dentures. Bone height and relapse were evaluated using digital orthopantomographic radiographs. ResultsThe radiological findings showed that the mean distraction was 6.968 mm in Group 1 and 7.031 mm in Group 2. At the end of the consolidation period, the mean bone relapse was 0.832 ± 0.135 mm in Group 1 and 0.738 ± 0.135 mm in Group 2. At the end of 6 months, the mean bone relapse was 1.380 ± 0.144 mm in Group 1 and 1.112 ± 0.144 mm in Group 2. No significant difference existed between the two groups at any time. ConclusionConsolidation periods may be reduced in alveolar distraction osteogenesis to enable more patient comfort by providing dentures early.

Correction of Postsurgical Alveolar Ridge Defect With Vertical Alveolar Distraction of the Onlay Block Graft

Alveolar bone augmentation for dental implant rehabilitation is one of the greatest challenges for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Bringing out an inadequate quantity of vertical bone during augmentation compromises correct implant positioning and the resulting prosthetic restoration. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis is now generally used in correcting alveolar ridge atrophy due to trauma, congenital defects, or periodontal defects. Onlay block grafting is a suitable method for restoring the alveolar bony defects. However, it sometimes can become a complicated procedure to repair the horizontal defect accompanying a vertical defect using only bone blocks. This clinical report presents a successful reconstruction of a severe anterior mandibular alveolar bony defect as a result of impacted teeth extraction and periodontal problem in a 50-year-old healthy female patient. The defect was reconstructed with symphysis graft and platelet-rich fibrin in the first step. Vertical alveolar distraction was performed on the grafted site to maintain the suitable bony height 3 months later. Grafted bony segment distraction and the treatment options in similar cases were also discussed in this clinical report among with the literature.