Verteporfin For Choroidal Neovascularization Research Articles

A Long-Term Study of Photodynamic Therapy with Verteporfin for Choroidal Neovascularization at the Edge of Chorioretinal Atrophy in Pathologic Myopia

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) on choroidal neovascularization (CNV) at the edge of chorioretinal atrophy in eyes with pathologic myopia. Procedures: Twenty eyes of 20 consecutive patients were treated according to Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on CNV location and were followed up with clinical and fluorescein angiographic examinations to evaluate visual acuity (VA) changes and number of treatments. Results: The mean follow-up was 35 months. In group 1 (n = 8; subfoveal CNV), VA declined from 20/73 (0.56 ± 0.26 logMAR) to 20/115 (0.76 ± 0.30 logMAR; p = 0.192). In group 2 (n = 6; juxtafoveal CNV), VA improved from 20/69 (0.54 ± 0.25 logMAR) to 20/46 (0.36 ± 0.16 logMAR; p = 0.176). In group 3 (n = 6; extrafoveal CNV), VA worsened from 20/50 (0.40 ± 0.21 logMAR) to 20/91 (0.66 ± 0.49 logMAR; p = 0.292). Conclusions: PDT showed inhibitory effects on myopic CNV arising at the edge of chorioretinal atrophy, especially in young adult myopic eyes with juxtafoveal neovascular membranes.

Intravenous Diclofenac as Prophylactic Treatment for Verteporfin-Associated Low Back Pain

The authors report on the therapeutic effect of intravenous diclofenac on verteporfin associated low back pain (LBP), which is the most frequent adverse effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for macular degeneration. The authors studied 818 patients who received PDT with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization. Systemic blood pressures were recorded in all study participants half an hour before PDT treatment. All patients who experienced LBP during verteporfin infusion were asked to grade their pain as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or unbearable (4). Thirty-three patients had LBP during their first verteporfin infusion. Of these, 11 subjects (1.34% of all) reported increased pain scores (level 2 to 4) and received intravenous diclofenac ahead of their next PDT. Patients with LBP during verteporfin infusion had significantly higher systolic blood pressures than uncomplicated cases (180 mmHg vs 155 mmHg, p=0.01). Treatment with intravenous diclofenac short before PDT significantly reduced the patients' mean pain score by 1.8 levels (p=0.0001). In this study, intravenous application of diclofenac short before verteporfin infusion effectively prevented verteporfin associated LBP in patients with systemic hypertension.

PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH VERTEPORFIN FOR CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

To assess the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with retinal pigment epithelium detachment (PED) in age-related macular degeneration. Thirty eyes of 26 patients with CNV and PED were treated with PDT. The eyes were divided in two groups based on CNV location in relation to PED; group 1 included 13 eyes with CNV within PED, and group 2 included 17 eyes with CNV at the edge of PED. The median follow-up was 16 months. Patients received a mean +/- SD of 2.83 +/- 1.26 treatments (range, 1-6 treatments). In the whole cohort, the mean preoperative visual acuity changed from 20/144 (0.86 +/- 0.42 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) to 20/182 (0.96 +/- 0.51 logMAR; P = 0.39) at month 18. Five eyes (16%) gained a mean of 1.5 Snellen lines from baseline. Twelve eyes (40%) lost a mean of 1.7 Snellen lines of visual acuity. Vision in 13 eyes (44%) remained stable. In group 1, the mean visual acuity at month 12 was 20/303 (1.18 +/- 0.51 logMAR) and significantly (P = 0.015) worse than that, 20/110 (0.74 +/- 0.42 logMAR), in group 2. PDT can improve or stabilize visual function in 60% of eyes with vascularized PED. CNV at the edge of PED appears to respond more favorably to PDT. Appropriate patient selection and prompt treatment are essential to obtain the best outcomes after verteporfin therapy.

Photodynamic Therapy With Verteporfin for Choroidal Neovascularization in Patients with Angioid Streaks

PurposeTo evaluate the functional and anatomic outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with angioid streaks.MethodsThe authors retrospectively evaluated 6 consecutive patients (6 eyes) with CNV secondary to angioid streaks. All patients were treated with standard PDT with verteporfin protocol. Standardized protocol refraction, visual acuity testing, ophthalmologic examination, color photographs, fluorescein angiograms and indocyanin angiograms were used to evaluate the results of PDT with verteporfin. Main outcome measures were visual acuity and CNV size.ResultsTheir mean age was 61.3±5.50 years (range, 53-68 years). Follow-up time ranged from 12 to 38 months with mean of 20.5±10.91 months. The mean visual acuity at baseline was 20/100 (range 20/25-20/500), and the mean visual acuity at the last examination was 20/320(range 20/125-counting finger). The mean greatest linear dimension (GLD) at baseline was 2400±766.81 µm, and the mean GLD at the last examination was 3483±444.59 µm.ConclusionsPDT for CNV associated with angioid streaks seemed to slow down but not prevent the progression of the disease and associated visual loss.

Choroidal Ischemia After Photodynamic Therapy With Verteporfin for Choroidal Neovascularization

To report delay in choroidal perfusion suggestive of ischemia after photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Observational case series. Retrospective review of all patients who developed choroidal ischemia after PDT. This vascular change was found in eight (2.1%) of 373 eyes of patients treated for CNV as a result of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and in one (0.9%) of 114 eyes treated for pathologic myopia. A decrease of 3 lines of vision was reported to occur one week after treatment in patients with AMD. At the 12-month examination, patients did not exhibit any marked changes in visual acuity. Choroidal ischemia was an uncommon manifestation owing to the selectivity of verteporfin therapy and the existence of abundant anastomotic vascular connections in the choroid. The low incidence of this vascular event should not preclude counseling PDT in eyes that could benefit greatly from this therapy.

Australian Angiogram Review Panel – monitoring the use of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to macular disease received an Australian government grant in 2002 to fund treatment for 3 years. Funding was restricted to subfoveal predominantly classic CNV where visual acuity was at least 6/60. Access to this funding was via review of angiograms by an expert panel, the Angiogram Review Panel (ARP), managed by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. De-identified data from the ARP were obtained for the period June 2002 to April 2005 inclusive and the panel's outcomes were analysed. Health Insurance Commission and Department of Veteran Affairs data for photodynamic therapy for the same interval were also retrieved. A total of 7198 submissions to the ARP were received for 5867 individuals in this period. Overall 86.6% eyes submitted were accepted for initial funding (treatments 2-4). There was no change over time in the percentage rejected during this period. The first reviewer accepted 77.2%. And the second reviewer accepted a further 7.7%. An additional 1.6% were accepted on appeal. It was estimated that 29.2% of this initial cohort received five or more treatments. The ARP data indicate an incidence of subfoveal predominantly classic CNV secondary to macular disease in Australia of about 2000 eyes per annum. Only one quarter of patients received five or more treatments. The panel provided a unique opportunity to estimate the 'whole of nation' incidence of predominantly classic subfoveal CNV secondary to macular disease and thus provides a firm foundation upon which to plan public health spending as new treatments become available.

Photodynamic Therapy for Choroidal Neovascularization Associated With Submacular Hemorrhage in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

To describe visual acuity results after photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) associated with large submacular hemorrhage (SMH). Eyes that had AMD, at least 12 months' follow-up, and SMH of at least 2.5 mm2, and had received no other treatment modality in conjunction with PDT, were divided into two groups: eyes with spontaneous SMH that was treated with PDT and eyes with SMH that occurred following PDT treatment. The presence of SMH did not preclude the patients from undergoing further PDT. Mean acuity of the spontaneous SMH group was 20/294 initially and 20/252 after 12 months. Mean acuity of the post-PDT SMH group was 20/336 initially and 20/406 after 12 months. Initial and 12-month acuities in both groups were not statistically different. Mean size of the hemorrhage was 11.5 mm2 in the spontaneous SMH group and 17.8 mm2 in the post-PDT SMH group. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference between initial and final visual acuities, regardless of the presence of blood under the fovea. Analysis by size of the SMH showed only the spontaneous SMH group with hemorrhages over 10 mm2 to have a statistically significant difference in visual acuity at 12 months (P= .0001; initial acuity, 20/230; 12-month acuity, 20/456). Eyes treated with PDT for choroidal neovascularization associated with submacular hemorrhage and AMD maintained stable vision over 12 months.

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization in patients with angioid streaks

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization associated with angioid streaks. DESIGN: Prospective interventional case series. METHODS: Eight patients (eight eyes) with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to angioid streaks were reviewed. Standardized protocol refraction, visual acuity testing, ophthalmologic examinations, color photographs, fluorescein angiograms and indocyanine angiograms were used to evaluate the results of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. Follow up ranged from 6 to 12 months with a mean (± SD) of 8.75 (± 2.37) months. RESULTS: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin was well tolerated in patients with choroidal neovascularization related to angioid streaks. No deterioration in visual acuity was observed. Increase in median best-corrected visual acuity was 1.37 lines (SD ± 1.59 lines, range 1–5 lines) at the last follow up. Two (25%) patients had no improvement of visual acuity. At the last follow up three (37.5%) patients showed no leakage and three (37.5%) patients had minimal leakage from choroidal neovascularization. Photodynamic therapy related ocular complications were not reported in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin generally achieved short-term cessation of or decrease of fluorescein leakage from subfoveal choroidal neovascularization without loss of vision in patients with angioid streaks. Further studies with longer follow up are necessary to confirm whether verteporfin therapy is beneficial for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization related to angioid streaks.

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization in patients with diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE: To report the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in three patients with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) from age-related macular degeneration and underlying diabetic retinopathy. The level of diabetic retinopathy would have excluded these patients from participation in previously reported randomized clinical trials evaluating PDT with verteporfin due to a theoretic concern of damage to the overlying retinal vasculature. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Three patients from a referral practice with at least severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and a history of clinically significant macular edema developed loss of vision from concurrent choroidal neovascularization evaluated with fundus photography and fluorescein angiography before and after PDT with verteporfin to identify adverse retinal vascular events. RESULTS: Four eyes in three patients had PDT using verteporfin. Three eyes received two treatments. With short follow-up, visual acuity remained stable in two eyes, improved from 20/400 to 20/320 in one eye, and decreased from 20/200 to 20/400 in one eye. Fluorescein angiograms at intervals from 2 weeks to 3 months after PDT showed no damage to the retinal vasculature or progression of the diabetic retinopathy, but did show a decreased area of fluorescein leakage from CNV. One eye that had new subretinal hemorrhage following treatment appeared to show new vasculopathy on initial evaluation of the post-treatment angiogram. Retrospective review suggested that the subretinal hemorrhage provided increased contrast to more easily visualize vasculopathy that was present before the PDT. CONCLUSIONS: Three patients with diabetic retinopathy undergoing a total of seven PDT treatments with verteporfin in four eyes had no new retinal vascular abnormalities develop. No other atypical responses of CNV to PDT were noted except new subretinal hemorrhage, providing increased contrast of the overlying vasculature, which gave the false impression of the development of new vasculopathy in one eye. Patients with diabetic retinopathy who have concurrent CNV for which PDT with verteporfin is recommended should be cautioned regarding the theoretical concerns of harming the retinal vasculature. Periodic surveillance for such concerns seems warranted until more experience is obtained.

PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH VERTEPORFIN FOR CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION CAUSED BY AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for choroidal neovascularization caused by age-related macular degeneration: results of a single treatment in a phase 1 and 2 study. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1161–1173.