Vertebral Column Decancellation Research Articles

Current status of surgical treatment for angular kyphosis in spinal tuberculosis

To review current status of surgical treatment for angular kyphosis in spinal tuberculosis and provide reference for clinical treatment. The literature on the surgical treatment for angular kyphosis of spinal tuberculosis in recent years was extensively reviewed and summarized from the aspects of surgical indications, surgical contraindications, surgical approach, selection of osteotomy, and perioperative management. Angular kyphosis of spine is a common complication in patients with spinal tuberculosis. If kyphosis progresses gradually, it is easy to cause neurological damage, deterioration, and delayed paralysis, which requires surgical intervention. At present, surgical approaches for angular kyphosis of the spine include anterior approach, posterior approach, and combined anterior and posterior approaches. Anterior approach can be performed for patients with severe spinal cord compression and small kyphotic Cobb angle. Posterior approach can be used for patients with large kyphotic Cobb angle but not serious neurological impairment. A combined anterior and posterior approaches is an option for spinal canal decompression and orthosis. Osteotomy for kyphotic deformity include Smith-Peterson osteotomy (SPO), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), vertebral column resection(VCR), vertebral column decancellation (VCD), posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR), deformed complex vertebral osteotomy (DCVO), and Y-shaped osteotomy. SPO and PSO are osteotomy methods with relatively low surgical difficulty and low surgical risks, and can provide 15°-30° angular kyphosis correction effect. VCR or PVCR is a representative method of osteotomy and correction. The kyphosis correction can reach 50° and is suitable for patients with severe angular kyphosis. VCD, DCVO, and Y-shaped osteotomy are emerging surgical techniques in recent years. Compared with VCR, the surgical risks are lower and the treatment effects also improve to varying degrees. Postoperative recovery is also a very important part of the perioperative period and should be taken seriously. There is no consensus on the choice of surgical treatment for angular kyphosis in spinal tuberculosis. Osteotomy surgery are invasive, which is a problem that colleagues have always been concerned about. It is best to choose a surgical method with less trauma while ensuring the effectiveness.

Comparison of pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column decancellation for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The goal in this study was to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of vertebral column decancellation (VCD) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity. This study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The authors conducted a computer search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database to collect controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of VCD and PSO for patients with AS with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity. The search covered the period from database establishment to March 2023. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies; these researchers recorded the authors and the sample size, and they extracted data on the intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry Disability Index, spine sagittal parameters, operation time, and complications in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library. A total of 6 cohort studies with a total of 342 patients were included in this study, including 172 patients in the VCD group and 170 patients in the PSO group. The VCD group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the PSO group (mean difference [MD] -274.92, 95% CI -506.63 to -43.20, p = 0.02); significant correction of the sagittal vertical axis compared with the PSO group (MD 7.32, 95% CI -1.24 to 15.87, p = 0.03), and the operation time was shorter than that of the PSO group (MD -80.28, 95% CI -150.07 to -10.48, p = 0.02). This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that VCD had more advantages than PSO in correcting the sagittal imbalance in the treatment of AS with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity, and VCD had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and satisfactory results in improving the quality of life.

Tips and Pearls in Spinal Osteotomy

Background and Aim: Spinal osteotomy is a general term for techniques applied to correct spinal deformity. The aims of osteotomy are to create a normal range of spine curvature, pain relief, and to improve quality of life. In the cases where spinal deformities cannot be corrected using instrumentation alone or by facet or ligament release, osteotomy is indicated. In spinal osteotomies, spinal alignment is corrected by removing part of the spinal bone. Osteotomies can be performed as anteroposterior or posterior-only procedures with a greater predilection for posterior-only procedures. Different types of osteotomy are available, including the Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), Ponte osteotomy (PO), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), corner osteotomy (CO), or bone-disc-bone osteotomy (BDBO), vertebral column decancellation (VCD) and vertebral column resection (VCR). Methods and Materials/Patients: In this narrative study, to provide up-to-date information, we precisely reviewed articles in the osteotomies context. Using the keywords spinal osteotomy, spinal deformity, Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), vertebral column resection (VCR), vertebral column decancellation (VCD), Ponte osteotomy (PO), corner osteotomy (CO), all the relevant articles were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and critically reviewed and analyzed. Results: In the spine surgery, osteotomy is performed to correct the deformity in uncorrectable spinal deformity. The suitable type of osteotomy is selected based on the etiology, type, and apex of deformity, surgeon's experience, availability of blood and bleeding control agents, and availability of intensive care. A wider acceptance of posterior-only procedures exists in osteotomy. Conclusion: In spinal deformity surgery, more degrees of correction are needed for better cosmetic results, and for this purpose, spinal osteotomy has a central role. For this reason, all spine surgeons should be familiar with these osteotomy techniques.

Posterior 3-Column Osteotomy for Treatment of Congenital Kyphosis with Multiple Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Anterior Unsegmented Vertebrae: A Comparison Between Patients with Increasing Number of Anterior Unsegmented Vertebrae

A 3-column osteotomy is sometimes challenging in congenital kyphosis (CK) with many anterior unsegmented vertebrae (AUVs). This study compared surgical outcomes of single-level 3-column osteotomy and associated complications in CK with increasing number of AUVs. We retrospectively reviewed 25 consecutive patients with AUVs in CK who underwent surgery at a mean age of 16.2 ± 10.3 years. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to the number of AUVs: 3 AUVs and ≥4 AUVs. Osteotomy types, surgical outcomes, and related complications were analyzed and compared between groups. The 3 AUVs group comprised 13 patients, and the ≥4 AUVs group comprised 12 patients. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy, grade 4 osteotomy, vertebral column resection, and vertebral column decancellation accounted for 15.4%, 38.5%, 46.1%, and 0% of procedures in the 3 AUVs group and 8.3%, 0%, 83.3%, and 8.3% of procedures in the ≥4 AUVs group. Preoperative focal kyphosis, which was significantly higher in the ≥4 AUVs group (82.9° ± 28° vs. 59.7° ± 9.4°, P= 0.010), was corrected in both groups postoperatively. The ≥4 AUVs group had significantly higher remaining kyphosis (33.6° ± 13.4° vs. 15.1° ± 9.1°, P < 0.001) with a significantly lower correction rate (61.2% ± 13.6% vs. 75.0% ± 15.6%, P= 0.001). The complication rate, mainly involving vertebral subluxation and proximal junctional kyphosis, was significantly higher in the ≥4 AUVs group than the 3 AUVs group (8/12 vs. 1/13, P= 0.004). Posterior single-level 3-column osteotomy can achieve satisfactory kyphosis correction in CK with 3 AUVs. Decreasing kyphosis correction and increasing surgery-related complications are prone to develop when treating CK with ≥4 AUVs.

Clinical Effect of Vertebral Column Decancellation Osteotomy Combined with Ponte Osteotomy in Elderly Patients with Old Thoracolumbar Fracture Combined with Kyphosis Deformity

Objective. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical effect of vertebral column decancellation (VCD) osteotomy combined with Ponte osteotomy in elderly patients withold thoracolumbar fracture combined with kyphosis deformity.Methods.36 elderly patients with old thoracolumbar fracture combined with kyphosis deformity admitted to our hospital from August 2015 to November 2018 were selected as the study subjects, and all of them were treated with VCDosteotomy combined with Ponte osteotomy.The Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), visual analog scale (VAS) score.Oswestry disability index (ODI) and life quality were compared at 1 week before and after surgery as well as at the last follow-up. Results. ® All the 36 patients underwent the surgery successfully without serious complications, with the average duration of surgery of (5.13±0.62) h, average blood loss of (821.58±142.67) ml and average hospital stay of (14.02±2.43) d. (2) The Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis and SVA at 1 week after surgery and at the last follow-up were smaller than those at 1 week before surgery (P &lt; 0.01), but the Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis and SVA at the last follow-up were slightly larger than those at 1 week after surgery (P &lt; 0.01). (3) The VAS score and ODI score at 1 week after surgery and at the last follow-up were lower than those before surgery (P &lt; 0.01), and the VAS score and ODI score at the last follow-up were lower than those at 1 week after surgery (P &lt; 0.01). @ The scoliosis research society 22-item (SRS-22) score at the last follow-up was higher than that before surgery (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion. VCD osteotomy combined with Ponte osteotomy in the treatment of old thoracolumbar fracture combined with kyphosis deformity in the elderly can reduce the Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis, improve sagittal balance, reduce pain symptoms and functional disorders, and improve patents’ life quality, having a good clinical effect.

Asymmetrical vertebral column decancellation for the management of rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis

BackgroundCongenital kyphoscoliosis is a disease that often requires surgical treatment. Wedge osteotomies, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy, are insufficient to correct this complicated rigid deformity. Vertebral column resection yields sufficient correction, but it is an exhaustively lengthy operation with a high risk of major complications. There are few effective and safe techniques for treating rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis. We aimed to investigate the technique of asymmetrical vertebral column decancellation (AVCD) for the treatment of rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis and evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of patients treated with the technique.MethodsBetween January 2013 to June 2017, the data of 31 patients with congenital kyphoscoliosis who underwent single level AVCD were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographical parameters and the visual analogue scale, Asia Spinal Injury Association, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were documented. The patients were followed up for an average period of 29 months.ResultsThe average operative time was 273.9 ± 46.1 min. The average volume of blood loss was 782.3 ± 162.6 ml. The main coronal curve improved from a mean of 81.4° preoperatively to 24.7° at the final follow-up, and the coronal balance improved from 28.9 to 7.6 mm. The degree of local kyphosis improved from a mean of 86.5° to 29.2°, and the sagittal balance improved from 72.3 to 16.9 mm. All clinical outcomes also improved significantly from preoperatively to the final follow-up. No permanent postoperative neurologic complications occurred.ConclusionThe AVCD surgical procedure corrects spinal deformities in both the coronal and sagittal planes by way of a convex-sided Y shape osteotomy, achieves satisfactory realignment without additional neurological complications, and can be considered an alternative treatment for rigid congenital kyphoscoliosis.

A Prospective Comparison of Vertebral Column Decancellation Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Thoracolumbar Kyphosis

Study Design: A prospective study. Summary of Background Data: For advanced stages of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the correction of spine deformities is quite often with pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). We reported a new resected technique of spinal osteotomy, called the vertebral column decancellation (VCD) in 2010 to treat rigid scoliosis and severe sharp angular spinal deformities. We first report comparisons between VCD with PSO. Objective: We performed to compare VCD and PSO in correcting kyphosis deformities related to AS.

Clinical results and surgery tactics of spinal osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis: experience of 428 patients

ObjectiveTo report the clinical results and surgical tactics of spinal osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) kyphosis based on the experiences of 428 patients.MethodsFrom January 2003 to January 2015, a total of 428 patients suffering from AS kyphosis who underwent a one- or two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) or vertebral column decancellation (VCD) osteotomy in our hospital were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative radiological parameters and the chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) were measured. Intraoperative, postoperative, and general complications were recorded.ResultsAll patients could walk with horizontal vision and lie on their backs postoperatively. The pre- and postoperative average global kyphosis (GK) angles were corrected from 82.6 to 12.7° (p = 0.000) in the two-level group and from 55.8 to 9.6° (p = 0.000) in the one-level group, respectively. The mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA) improved from 29.4 to 8 cm (p = 0.000) in the two-level group and from 18.0 to 4.3 cm (p = 0.000) in the one-level group. The CBVA improved from 68.3 to 8.2° (p = 0.000) in the two-level group and from 46.2 to 4.2° (p = 0.000) in the one-level group. Although no major acute complications such as death or complete paralysis occurred, the complication rate was 6.5% in the one-level group and 23.6% in the two-level group.ConclusionSpinal osteotomy, such as PSO and VCD, can improve the quality of life of AS patients as well as correct kyphotic deformities. The one-level spinal osteotomy showed a lower complication rate, while two-level spinal osteotomy was a relatively aggressive procedure that was more suitable in correcting severe AS kyphotic deformities.

Development of a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of Thoracolumbar Kyphotic Deformity following Vertebral Column Decancellation.

Background Vertebral column decancellation (VCD) is a new spinal osteotomy technique to correct thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity (TLKD). Relevant biomechanical research is needed to evaluate the safety of the technique and the fixation system. We aimed to develop an accurate finite element (FE) model of the spine with TLKD following VCD and to provide a reliable model for further biomechanical analysis. Methods A male TLKD patient who had been treated with VCD on L2 and instrumented from T10 to L4 was a volunteer for this study. The CT scanning images of the postoperative spine were used for model development. The FE model, simulating the spine from T1 to the sacrum, includes vertebrae, intervertebral discs, spinal ligaments, pedicle screws, and rods. The model consists of 509580 nodes and 445722 hexahedrons. The ranges of motion (ROM) under different loading conditions were calculated for validation. The stresses acting on rods, screws, and vertebrae were calculated. Results The movement trend, peak stress, and ROM calculated by the current FE model are consistent with previous studies. The FE model in this study is able to simulate the mechanical response of the spine during different motions with different loading conditions. Under axial compression, the rod was the part bearing the peak stress. During flexion, the stress was concentrated on proximal pedicle screws. Under extension and lateral bending, an osteotomized L1 vertebra bore the greatest stress on the model. During tests, ligament disruption and unit deletion were not found, indicating an absence of fracture and fixation breakage. Discussion A subject-specific FE model of the spine following VCD is developed and validated. It can provide a reliable and accurate digital platform for biomechanical analysis and surgical planning.

Comparison of loss of correction between PSO and VCD technique in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis, a minimum 2\u2009years follow-up

BackgroundPedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column decancellation (VCD) are frequently used methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis resulting from ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, there are limited reports performed to evaluate the difference of loss of correction and the effectiveness of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS.ObjectiveTo retrospectively estimate the effectiveness of correction and loss of correction of PSO and VCD techniques in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 61 consecutive AS kyphosis patients undergoing PSO or VCD surgery from March 2012 to April 2015. The patients were divided into PSO group (n = 25) and VCD group (n = 36) according to the types of osteotomies. Measurement of the radiographic parameters was performed and the change was analyzed.ResultsMean loss of correction in the global kyphosis was 2.31° in the PSO group and 2.29° in VCD group at the last follow-up, respectively, with no significant difference. Progressive junctional kyphosis occurred in both groups. VCD obtained a significantly larger correction than PSO while sharing a similar incidence of complications. No serious complications were observed in the two groups.ConclusionThe PSO osteotomy and VCD osteotomy are both safe and effective methods in treating thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS. Mild loss of correction mainly occurred in the global kyphosis in both techniques with no significant difference.

Comparison of 2 Surgeries in Correction of Severe Kyphotic Deformity Caused by Ankylosing Spondylitis: Vertebral Column Decancellation and Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy

To compare the treatment results between 1-level vertebral column decancellation (VCD) and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for correcting severe kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). VCD and PSO have been used to correct AS-related kyphotic deformity, but the differences on correcting results between VCD and PSO are not clear. Between 2013 and 2015, 57 patients underwent 1-level spinal osteotomy (VCD: n= 30; PSO: n= 27) for correcting kyphotic deformity. Sagittal parameters, fusion results, surgical information, and clinical outcomes were documented and compared. All data were obtained before and 1 week after surgery, 6 months after surgery, and at final follow-up (at least 2 years). VCD provided significantly greater osteotomy angle (50.8° ± 9.7°) than PSO (38.5° ± 6.1°). In the VCD group, the change of the anterior column was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm, which was larger than the PSO group. The middle column was shortened by 9.9 ± 2.0 mm and 19.1 ± 3.3 mm in the VCD group and PSO group, respectively. There was no significant difference in operating time and blood loss between the 2 groups. All cases had solid fusion. Between the 2 groups, Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22 scores were similar at the final follow-up. No major acute complications occurred in both groups. VCD is a safe and effective method in treating rigid kyphotic deformity secondary to AS. VCD provides a larger correction angle in one segment and preserves more height of osteotomized vertebrae than PSO.

Vertebral column decancellation in Pott\u2019s deformity: use of Surgimap Spine for preoperative surgical planning, retrospective review of 18 patients

BackgroundIn the late stage of Spinal tuberculosis, the bony destruction and vertebral collapse often leads to significant kyphosis, presenting clinically as a painful gibbus deformity, with increased instability, vertebral body translations and increased risk of neurologic involvement. Vertebral column decancellation is thought to be suitable for most patients with severe rigid kyphosis. Surgimap Spine, could offer a pragmatic graphical method for the surgical planning of osteotomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Vertebral column decancellation planned preoperatively with the computer software-assistance in the patients with Pott’s kyphosis.MethodsBetween May 2012 and May 2015, 18 patients with Pott’s kyphosis underwent the Vertebral column decancellation using Surgimap Spine for preoperative surgical planning. Preoperative and postoperative Konstam’s angle, sagittal vertical angle, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic tilt and pelvic incidence were measured. Visual analog scale and American Spinal Injury Association were documented.ResultsThe Konstam’s angles decreased from 88.1° (range, 70–105°) preoperatively to 18.5° (range, 7–31°) (P < 0.01). All patients reached the physiological limits at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score was reduced from preoperative 7.1 (range, 6–8) to 1.8 (range, 1–3, P < 0.01) and the ODI improved from 65.8% (range, 58–74%) to 20.2% (range, 12–38%, P < 0.01). At final follow-up, there was radiographic evidence of solid fusion at the osteotomy site and fixed segments in all patients. Neurological function improved from ASIA scale D to E in 5 patients. The patients were followed up for 30.4 months on average.ConclusionVertebral column decancellation is an effective treatment option for severe Pott’s kyphosis. The surgical planning software Surgimap Spine can be a reliable and helpful tool that provides a simplified method to evaluate and analyze the spino-pelvic parameters and simulate the osteotomy procedure. According to individual character, the appropriate surgery strategy should be selected.

Vertebral column decancellation: a new spinal osteotomy technique for correcting rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

The aim of this study is to introduce and investigate the efficacy and feasibility of a new vertebral osteotomy technique, vertebral column decancellation (VCD), for rigid thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity (TLKD) secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We took 39 patients from between January 2009 and January 2013 (26 male, 13 female, mean age 37.4 years, 28 to 54) with AS and a TLKD who underwent VCD (VCD group) and compared their outcome with 45 patients (31 male, 14 female, mean age 34.8 years, 23 to 47) with AS and TLKD, who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO group), according to the same selection criteria. The technique of VCD was performed at single vertebral level in the thoracolumbar region of AS patients according to classification of AS kyphotic deformity. Pre- and post-operative chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and sagittal Cobb angle in the thoracolumbar region were reviewed in the VCD and PSO groups. Intra- , post-operative and general complications were analysed in both group. lf patients could lie on their backs and walk with horizontal vision and sagittal profile, radiographic parameters improved significantly post-operatively in both groups. No major acute complications such as death or complete paralysis occurred in either group. In the VCD group, five patients (12.8%) experienced complications such as severe CSF leak (n = 4), deep wound infection (n = 1) and in one patient a transient neurological deficit occurred. In the PSO group, eight patients (17.8%) suffered conditions such as severe CSF leak (n = 5), infections (n = 2) and sagittal translation at osteotomy site (n = 1). Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-22) improved significantly in both groups. All patients achieved solid fusion at latest follow-up and no implant failures were noted in either group. The VCD technique is a new, safe and effective strategy for correction of rigid TLKD in AS patients. The main advantage of the new correction mechanism is that it achieved a satisfactory correction by controlled anterior column opening and posterior column closing, avoiding the occurrence of sagittal translation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:672-8.

Complex osteotomies vertebral column resection and decancellation.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is nowadays widely used to treat sagittal imbalance. Some complex malalignment cases cannot be treated by a PSO, whereas the imbalance is coronal or mixed or the sagittal imbalance is major and cannot be treated by a single PSO. The aim of this article was to review these complex situations--coronal imbalance, mixed imbalance, two-level PSO, vertebral column resection, and vertebral column decancellation, and to focus on their specificities. It wills also to evoke the utility of navigation in these complex cases.

Vertebral column decancellation for the management of sharp angular spinal deformity

The management goal of sharp angular spinal deformity is to realign the spinal deformity and safely decompress the neurological elements. However, some shortcomings related to current osteotomy treatment for these deformities are still evident. We have developed a new spinal osteotomy technique—vertebral column decancellation (VCD), including multilevel vertebral decancellation, removal of residual disc, osteoclasis of the concave cortex, compression of the convex cortex accompanied by posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws, with the expectation to decrease surgical-related complications. From January 2004 to March 2007, 45 patients (27 males/18 females) with severe sharp angular spinal deformities at our institution underwent VCD. The diagnoses included 29 congenital kyphoscoliosis and 16 Pott’s deformity. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic evaluation was performed. Intraoperative, postoperative and general complications were noted. For a kyphosis deformity, an average of 2.2 vertebrae was decancellated (range, 2–4 vertebrae). The mean preoperative kyphosis was +98.6° (range, 82°–138°), and the mean kyphosis in the immediate postoperative period was +16.4° (range, 4°–30°) with an average postoperative correction of +82.2° (range, 61°–124°). For a kyphoscoliosis deformity, the correction rate was 64% in the coronal plane (from 83.4°–30.0°) postoperatively and 32.5° (61% correction) at 2 years’ follow-up. In the sagittal plane, the average preoperative curve of 88.5° was corrected to 28.6° immediately after surgery and to 31.0° at 2 years’ follow-up. All patients had solid fusion at latest follow-up. Complications were encountered in eight patients (17.8%), including CSF leak (n = 1), deep wound infection (n = 1), epidural hematoma (n = 1), transient neurological deficit (n = 4), and complete paralysis (n = 1). The results of this study show that single-stage posterior VCD is an effective option to manage severe sharp angular spinal deformities.

Vertebral column decancellation for the management of rigid scoliosis: the effectiveness and safety analysis

to explore the effectiveness and safety of vertebral column decancellation (VCD) for the management of rigid scoliosis. from May 2004 to February 2008, 32 patients with rigid scoliosis underwent VCD were reviewed. There were 12 males and 20 females with an average age of 18 years (range, 10 - 56 years). The operation techniques included multilevel vertebral body decancellation and residual intervertebral disc resection, followed by realignment and posterior correction with pedicle screws. The effectiveness was evaluated by preoperative and postoperative radiography and three-dimensional CT scan reconstruction at final follow-up. The intraoperative and postoperative complications of all patients were recorded. a mean of 2.1 vertebrae were performed with VCD and a mean of 10.6 vertebral levels were instrumented and fused (range, 8 - 13 vertebrae). The mean duration of surgery was 270 minutes (range, 215 - 380 minutes). The average intraoperative blood loss was 1560 ml (range, 900 - 4800 ml). Complications were encountered in 4 patients. There were 2 cases with transient neurological deficits, 1 case with CSF leak, 1 case with epidural hematoma. The average time of follow-up was 31 months (range, 24 - 48 months). The correction rate was 61% on the coronal plane (from 108° to 42°), and the correction rate was 65% on the sagittal plane (from 82.0° to 28.7°). All patients had solid fusion at osteotomy site, and no instrumentational failure and loosening were found over the follow up. single stage posterior VCD is an effective option to manage rigid scoliosis.