Verbal Pain Descriptors Research Articles

Characteristics of Diverse Verbal Pain Descriptors in South Korean Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: 'Jeorim' (Tingling) and 'Sirim' (Cold) as Key Neuropathic Pain Descriptors.

The description of pain is the most-important indicator leading to the adequate treatment of patients with neuropathic pain (NeP). The purpose of this study was to identify and characterize the unique features of Korean verbal descriptions in patients with peripheral NeP. This study included 400 patients (167 males and 233 females) and their 1,387 pain-description responses. Patients with peripheral NeP freely described their symptoms in Korean. Collected verbal descriptions were grouped according to terminologies with similar meanings. Participants completed validated patient-reported outcome scales including the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) and painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q). The frequencies of each verbal pain descriptor were compared between the NPSI and PD-Q scores. 'Jeorim' (tingling) was the most common among 17 types of organized verbal pain descriptors, and the 'Sirim' (cold) symptom had a significantly higher rate of use in the 2 high-severity groups when participants were classified by their total scores on the NPSI and PD-Q. Korean verbal NeP descriptors were significantly diverse. The Jeorim (tingling) and Sirim (cold) descriptors can be utilized in evaluations of Korean patients with NeP.

Sex differences in perceptual responses to experimental pain before and after an experimental fatiguing arm task

BackgroundThe incidence and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is about twice as high in women compared to men, and those of the neck/shoulder region are particularly high among women. Fatigue and responses towards pain are known risk factor for MSDs. However, women have been shown to be less fatigable than men, but more sensitive to experimental pain. From a general standpoint, sex differences in the relationships between the fatigue and pain pathways are poorly understood. This may be due to differences in how men and women conceptually define the sensations of fatigue and pain. The objective of this study was to compare physical and verbal descriptors of fatigue and pain between men and women undergoing an experimental protocol where fatigue and pain were manipulated.MethodsHealthy adult volunteers (14 men and 14 women) underwent experimental pain tests to identify pressure pain threshold (PPT) at biceps brachii (BIC), anterior deltoid (AD), and upper trapezius (UT) followed by the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) before and after a repetitive arm task performed at shoulder height until reaching a rating of neck/shoulder perceived exertion, using the Borg Category Ratio 10 (CR10), greater than 8/10. PPT and MPQ data were analyzed using repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) (time × sex). Correlational analyses were used to investigate relationships between pain measures with time and fatigue.ResultsUT PPT was reduced following the fatiguing task (p ≤ 0.01). Men overall reported higher AD PPT levels compared to women (p ≤ 0.05). MPQ and PCS magnification scores were significantly higher after the fatiguing task (p ≤ 0.05), with no sex differences. Time to fatigue correlated with changes in AD PPT in men and with PCS scores in women.ConclusionsFindings suggest that mechanisms underlying the sensation of acute pain following a repetitive shoulder height task are closely linked with PPT changes in shoulder stabilizers (UT) irrespective of sex, and more so with physical pain responses in men and in attitudes towards pain in women. Sex differences in pain perception may contribute to a better understanding of sex-specific mechanisms underlying neck/shoulder MSDs.

The role of screening tools in diagnosing neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain affects 6-8% of the general adult population. It is reported by 27% of chronic pain patients and 40% of cancer patients, yet there is no standardized diagnostic test for neuropathic pain. A number of screening tools have been developed based on verbal pain descriptors, with or without limited clinical examination, to identify individuals with neuropathic pain. Over the past decade these neuropathic pain screening tools have been validated in a wide range of pain populations, as well as translated into many languages, to discriminate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain. We describe here the five most commonly used neuropathic pain screening tools and discuss current assessment guidelines, the use of screening tools in novel clinical contexts and their potential use in personalized therapy.

Sensory and Affective Pain Descriptors Respond Differentially to Pharmacological Interventions in Neuropathic Conditions

Pain management is limited by inability to match a patient's condition-and pain mechanisms-to optimal treatment(s). Much is known about pain treatment from animal investigations, but antinociceptive mechanisms cannot be readily explored in clinical studies. Evidence suggests that self-report verbal pain descriptors characterize important pain dimensions and may reflect diverse underlying mechanisms. This exploratory analysis of data from a trial of a gabapentin-morphine combination evaluated effects of treatment on short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire sensory and affective descriptor profiles and prediction of treatment response by these descriptors. Severity of "throbbing," "shooting," and "aching" improved preferentially with morphine over gabapentin, whereas "tiring-exhausting" and "sickening" improved preferentially with gabapentin over morphine. Improvement in descriptor severity with gabapentin-morphine combination was superior to active placebo for 12 of 15 short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire descriptors, whereas morphine and gabapentin were superior to active placebo for only 7 and 6 descriptors, respectively. Baseline moderate-severe "throbbing" and "hot-burning" predicted poor outcomes with gabapentin, whereas moderate-severe "aching" and "punishing-cruel" predicted favorable outcomes with gabapentin. Baseline "throbbing" severity also predicted poor outcomes with morphine. Baseline allodynia predicted superior reduction of "stabbing" with morphine but not with gabapentin alone. These results point to the hypothesis that sensory and affective pain descriptor profiles exhibit a treatment-specific response. Larger, more definitive, investigations to evaluate treatment-specific effects on multiple sensory and affective pain descriptors, and prediction of treatment response by these descriptors, will advance efforts toward developing and implementing more effective individualized pain therapies.

Tension‐Type Headache or Migraine? Adolescents' Pain Descriptions Are of Little Help

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of pain descriptors (pain quality, pain intensity) assessed in a questionnaire to discriminate tension-type headache (TTH) from TTH plus migraine in a sample of adolescents. Epidemiological studies assess pain characteristics via questionnaire and estimate prevalence rates based on these pain descriptions. According to International Headache Society criteria, the subjective pain quality and intensity for TTH and migraine differs and therefore should be able to discriminate the 2 diagnoses. The discriminative ability between TTH and TTH plus migraine may be a special challenge. One hundred twenty-two adolescents with pure TTH and 110 adolescents with TTH plus migraine aged 11-18 years presenting to a tertiary pediatric pain clinic were included in the study. Questionnaire reports of pain intensity and quality were compared with physician's diagnosis as the gold standard. Mean differences as well as receiver operating characteristics were analyzed. Adolescents with TTH plus migraine reported more pulsating and less intense pain compared with pure TTH. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that pain descriptors did not discriminate between groups. Diagnostic utility of descriptors was similarly low for older adolescents and parental proxy reports. Pain intensity and quality assessed by questionnaires are not suitable to discriminate TTH from TTH plus migraine. This may lead to inaccurate prevalence estimates in epidemiological studies and may mislead practitioners in forming diagnostic hypotheses. The exclusion of these pain descriptors in questionnaires should be considered. More research systematically assessing the diagnostic utility of verbal pain descriptors in primary care and epidemiological samples is needed.

Affective brain regions are activated during the processing of pain-related words in migraine patients

Several brain areas that constitute the neural matrix of pain can be activated by noxious stimuli and by pain-relevant cues, such as pictures, facial expressions, and pain-related words. Although chronic pain patients are frequently exposed to pain-related words, it remains unclear whether their pain matrix is specifically activated during the processing of such stimuli in comparison to healthy subjects. To answer this question, we compared the neural activations induced by verbal pain descriptors in a sample of migraine patients with activations in healthy controls using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants viewed pain-related adjectives and negative, non-pain-related adjectives that were matched for valence and arousal and were instructed to either generate mental images (imagination condition) or to count the number of vowels (distraction condition). In migraine patients, pain-related adjectives as compared with negative adjectives elicited increased activations in the left orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula during imagination and in the right secondary somatosensory cortex and posterior insula during distraction. More pronounced pain-related activation was observed in affective pain-related regions in the patient as compared with the control group during imagination. During distraction, no differential engagement of single brain structures in response to pain-related words could be observed between groups. Overall, our findings indicate that there is an involvement of brain regions associated with the affective and sensory-discriminative dimension of pain in the processing of pain-related words in migraine patients, and that the recruitment of those regions associated with pain-related affect is enhanced in patients with chronic pain experiences. Migraine patients show specific brain activation to pain-related words within regions of the pain matrix when compared to healthy controls.

Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Adapted Version of the DN4 Questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions) for Differential Diagnosis of Pain Syndromes with a Neuropathic or Somatic Component

Verbal descriptors of pain can provide a basis for distinguishing neuropathic pain (NP) from pain of non-neuropathic origin. Much research has been undertaken to develop screening tools for this purpose. The DN4 questionnaire (NP in four questions), is one of theses tools, which was developed and validated in French in 2005. The purpose of this work is to provide an Arabic, culturally appropriate, reliable, and valid version of the DN4 interview questionnaire for the diagnosis of NP. A study was conducted consisting of two phases. In the first phase, translation and cultural adaptation of the questionnaire into dialectal Arabic according to international guidelines was accomplished. The final version was reviewed by an expert panel, then tested on a group of 30 patients. The second phase was the validation of the translated version. The analysis of psychometric properties included reliability (internal consistency, inter-rater agreement) and validity (receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and determination of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values). A sample of 170 subjects (129 women, 75%; age: 49.5 ± 12.4 years), 94 (55.3%) with NP and 76 with non-neuropathic pain was enrolled. The questionnaire was reliable (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.63, inter-rater agreement coefficient: 0.96 [0.94-0.97]) and valid for a cut-off value ≥3 points, which was the best value to discriminate between NP and NNP subjects. This study represents the second validation DN4 in a language different from the original after the Spanish adaptation. These results support the high discriminatory value of the DN4 questionnaire for identification of NP.

Analgesic effects of ketamine infusion therapy in korean patients with neuropathic pain: A 2-week, open-label, uncontrolled study

Background: The overexcitation of the N-methyl- D-aspartate receptor complex appears to play a critical role in the development of neuropathic pain, and ketamine acts as an antagonist to that receptor. Some publications have reported on the prominent relief of neuropathic pain with intravenous or subcutaneous ketamine infusions or a single-dose intravenous ketamine injection despite adverse effects. Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to determine the analgesic effect of intravenous ketamine infusion therapy for neuropathic pain refractory to conventional treatments. Secondary objectives included identifying the variables related to the analgesic effect and the pain descriptors susceptible to ketamine infusion. Methods: This 2-week, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted in Korean patients with neuropathic pain recruited from the Samsung Seoul Hospital (Seoul, Republic of Korea) outpatient pain management unit. Patients were required to have a pain severity score >5 (visual analog scale [VAS], where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable) over a period of ≥1 month while on standard treatment. The patients were required to have shown no benefit from standard treatment and no pain relief lasting over 1 month. The ketamine infusion therapy was composed of 3 sessions performed consecutively every other day. Midazolam was administered concomitantly to reduce the occurrence of central nervous system-related adverse events (AEs) secondary to ketamine. Each session was as follows: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg were administered intravenously for 5 minutes as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg/h and midazolam 0.025 mg/kg/h for 2 hours. AEs were assessed in the following ways: close monitoring of ECG, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and evaluating the need for treatment of AEs during infu- sion and until discharge by an attending anesthesiologist; an open question about discomfort at the end of each session; spontaneous reports about AEs during each session; and the patients' and caregivers' checklist of AEs occurring at home for 2 weeks after discharge. All the descriptors of pain expressed by the patients in Korean were recorded and translated into appropriate English terminology on the basis of the literature on Korean verbal descriptors of pain. Each of the translated pain descriptors was then classified into 1 of 18 sensory items. Results: The overall VAS score for pain decreased from a baseline mean (SD) of 7.20 (1.77) to 5.46 (2.29) ( P < 0.001) 2 weeks after treatment in 103 patients (53 males and 50 females; mean age, 52.56 [17.33] years) who completed the study. Variables such as age, sex, and the duration and diagnosis of pain were not found to be associated with analgesic effect. Seven of the 18 pain descriptors were found to have a significant response to ketamine infusion treatment between baseline and 2 weeks follow-up: burning pain ( P = 0.008); dull, aching pain ( P < 0.001); overly sensitive to touch ( P = 0.002); stabbing pain ( P = 0.008); electric pain ( P = 0.031); tingling pain ( P < 0.001); and squeezing pain (P < 0.001). A total of 52 patients reported AEs: 33 during infusion and 44 during recovery and up to 2 weeks follow up. The most commonly reported AEs were snoring (15 [15%]) during infusion and dizziness (43 [42%]) during recovery. Conclusions: Ketamine infusion therapy was associated with reduced severity of neuropathic pain and generally well tolerated for up to 2 weeks in these patients with neuropathic pain refractory to standard treatment. Variables such as sex, age, and the diagnosis and duration of pain had no association with the analgesic effect of this treatment. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with ketamine infusion.

Can one predict the likely specific orofacial pain syndrome from a self-completed questionnaire?

To estimate the prevalence of orofacial pain (OFP) by specific diagnostic subgroups in the general population. Cross-sectional population study. General medical practice in South East Cheshire, UK. Participants of baseline investigation who completed the full postal questionnaire (1510, adjusted study participation rate 81%). Clinical examination was attended by 126 (43%) of all the participants who reported OFP in the questionnaire. These individuals were classified as musculoligamentous/soft tissue type, dentoalveolar or neurological/vascular. OFP duration, location, descriptors and statements on OFP were predictors of classification group. The estimated prevalence in the general population of musculoligamentous/soft tissue type of OFP was 7%, dentoalveolar 7% and neurological/vascular 6%. This study has derived a statistical model to classify participants with OFP into three broad groups (musculoligamentous/soft tissue, dentoalveolar and neurological/vascular) based on questionnaire information about OFP (OFP chronicity, location and verbal descriptors of pain). It is potentially useful in large population studies of OFP, where a clinical examination is not possible, however, further validation of its performance in large populations are necessary.

How separate are the sensory, emotional, and motivational dimensions of pain? A multidimensional scaling analysis

To map the structure of the space generated by verbal descriptors of pain, 41 male college students made pairwise similarity judgments to all possible pairings of 16 words that describe experiences commonly associated with noxious electrical stimulation. Individual Differences Scaling (INDSCAL) yielded four dimensions (D) in the group stimulus space: D-1, Intense to Moderate Experiences, contained two attributes: Strong Sensations and Strong Emotions; D-2, Moderate to Weak Experiences, exhibited two attributes: Moderate Sensations and Moderate Emotions; D-3, Motivational State, possessed two attributes: Pain and Arousal Level; D-4, Sensory Qualities, exhibited two attributes: Pain and Somatosensory Qualities. The interpretation of the dimensions was supported by Preference Mapping (PREFMAP) and by correlations between subject weights and (a) psychological tests and (b) responses to noxious electrical stimuli. Conclusion: semantically, the pain attribute or component of the total pain-suffering experience pervades emotional, motivational and somatosensory attributes. Pain is not an independent dimension. This means that a score on a pain rating scale is not a pure measure of the patient's pain, but is heavily influenced in unknown ways by the patient's emotional and motivational state.

Acute oral pain and mucositis in bone marrow transplant and leukemia patients: data from a pilot study.

The purposes of this prospective, repeated-measures descriptive pilot study were to describe patterns of acute oral pain and mucositis in patients receiving a bone marrow transplant or high-dose chemotherapy for leukemia, and to test procedures and instruments before initiating a larger intervention study. A nonprobability, purposive selection process was used to enroll 18 patients admitted to two acute care inpatient hospital units for bone marrow transplantation or leukemia therapy at a university health sciences center in the southeastern United States. Data were collected at baseline, then daily through patient interviews, oral examination, and chart review for at least 3 weeks or until discharge. Research variables were pain intensity, intolerable pain, verbal descriptors of pain, pain relief, and use of pain relief strategies (Pain Assessment Form), mucositis (erythema and ulceration) in eight anatomic locations of the oral cavity (Oral Mucositis Index), voice/talking (Oral Assessment Guide), and mood states (11-item Brief Profile of Mood States). Mild to moderate pain occurred in nearly 70% of patients and was described as "tender," "irritating," and "sore." Patients used pain medicines, mouth care, and mental and physical activities to relieve pain, and reported partial overall relief of pain. Mucositis was mild, with the tongue and buccal and labial mucosa most commonly affected with erythema and the buccal mucosa with ulceration. Voice/talking were only mildly impaired, and mood disturbance was mild. Patterns of pain, mucositis, and mood disturbance were consistent with each other and followed the trajectory described in previous research. Results suggest that nurses should continue to assess these symptoms vigorously and assist patients in selecting multiple management strategies. Research using repeated-measures designs in this acutely ill inpatient population is challenging and needs careful attention by researchers. The results have been used to improve the ongoing larger intervention study.

Statistical Analysis of Total Labor Pain Using the Visual Analog Scale and Application to Studies of Analgesic Effectiveness During Childbirth

Statistical Analysis of Total Labor Pain Using the Visual Analog Scale and Application to Studies of Analgesic Effectiveness During Childbirth

Representation of verbal pain descriptors on a visual analogue scale by dental patients and dental students.

Verbal rating scales (VRS), composed of ranked pain descriptors, are often employed in pain research. Factors that may influence the subjective pain intensity values, however, are not well established. In this study, 5 common pain descriptor adjectives were represented on a visual analogue scale (VAS) by a group of 80 dental students, by a group of 48 patients undergoing periodontal therapy, and by a group of 31 dental phobic patients. It was thought that each group of individuals on conducting the test represented a different degree of apprehension, ranging from a relaxed to a very tense status. There were differences in the interpretation of the pain descriptors between groups. Furthermore, age seemed to influence the interpretation of the pain descriptors. No correlation was found with gender. The descriptors did not divide the analogue scale into equal segments. 71% of all subjects gave the adjective "mild" a lower pain intensity representation than the adjective "weak", while the order was reversed among remaining subjects. Findings cast doubt on the reliability of VRS and the data handling methods commonly adopted in clinical pain research.

Long-term memory of acute postsurgical pain

The long-term memory of acute postoperative pain intensity was evaluated in a population of patients who had undergone the removal of impacted third molar teeth. The results suggest a positive correlation between experienced and remembered intensities of postsurgical pain for up to 3 years after surgery. They also suggest that males and females do not differ significantly in their reports of postsurgical pain intensity, nor do they differ significantly in their memories of pain intensity. Pain recall using verbal pain descriptors was more reliable than recall with visual analog scales. Patient reports of intensity of past postsurgical acute pain, particularly those reports obtained with verbal descriptors, may be useful in the planning of treatment and in the selection and evaluation of analgesic regimens.

The structure of meaning of verbal pain descriptors

The structure of meaning of verbal pain descriptors

Ethnographic methodologic assessment of pain perceptions by verbal description

This study was designed to use known anthropologic methods to gather and analyze qualitative data about verbal descriptors of pain among 25 Chinese, and 60 Western subjects (25 Anglo-Americans and 35 Scandinavians). The sample consisted of 54 patients and 31 dentists. Key pain descriptors from each cultural context were selected for construction of pain assessment instruments which allowed multidimensional statistical techniques to translate these data into cross-cultural quantitative indices. Results revealed dimensions of pain which were universal in all cultures examined. These included time, intensity, location, quality, cause and curability. More culture-specific dimensions included the Chinese concept suantong, a multidimensional concept of bone, muscle, joint, tooth and gingival pain. ‘Real’ and ‘imagined’ pains were contrasts described by Western subjects, especially dentists; ‘imagined pain’ being the conversion of fear or anxiety into perceived pain. These data indicate that the data gathering and data analytic methods were reliable and sensitive to cultural variables and that ethnicity played a stronger role in determining perceptions of pain description than professional socialization for this population sample of Chinese and Western subjects.

Syndrome-specific descriptor profiling: a psychophysiological and psychophysical approach.

Migraineurs and nonmigraineurs were compared in their selection of, psychophysical evaluation of, and psychophysiological response to verbal pain descriptors. Participants observed a series of 20 pain descriptors, each presented twice, 12 sec each time. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded during each presentation. Using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), participants also selected pain descriptors that described migraine headaches. Results indicated that migraineurs demonstrated greater skin conductance responsivity to the visual presentation of pain descriptors as compared to nonmigraineurs. Pain descriptors more frequently selected by migraineurs on the MPQ were associated with greater skin conductance orienting responses. No differences were observed between migraineurs and nonmigraineurs in the number of intensity of pain descriptors chosen for any of the sensory, affective, evaluative, or miscellaneous dimensions of the MPQ. Results suggest that migraineurs may be conditioned or sensitized to particular sets of verbal pain descriptors and that these processes may serve to differentiate among pain sufferers and pain-free populations.

Male-female differentiation of verbal and nonverbal pain descriptors and mpo scores in chronic benign head and neck pain

Male-female differentiation of verbal and nonverbal pain descriptors and mpo scores in chronic benign head and neck pain

The classification of back pain patients: Functional versus organic

Substantial numbers of patients suffer from chronic back pain without demonstrating identifiable organic pathology of the spine. Since standardized methods of assessing psychological disturbance (e.g. MMPI) in such patients often provoke hostility and resentment, a questionnaire (BPCS) was developed which employs verbal descriptors of pain in the evaluation of emotional problems. Although the initial findings were very promising our investigations question the psychometric properties of the BPCS.

Perception of pulpal pain as a function of intradental nerve activity

The purpose of the present investigation was to find neurophysiological correlates of pain perception. The magnitude and time course of perceived pain was successfully related to the neural discharge evoked by rapid cooling of the tooth surface in 6 dental patients whose lower incisors were to be extracted for prosthodontic reasons. Two cavities were prepared on the facial surface of human lower incisors. The cavities were deepened using hand driven instruments until the pulp was visible through a thin layer of dentin. A metal tube was placed in contact with amalgam on each cavity bottom and fixed in place by composite filling material. The tubes were connected to standard equipment for electrophysiological recordings by a flexible circuit. The magnitude of perceived pain was assessed by a cross-modality matching to finger span in combination with sensory verbal pain descriptors and magnitude estimation. The striking agreement between the integrated nerve activity, probably of the Aδ type and pain perception, is of great importance from the methodological point of view since it strongly argues in favor of the appropriateness of the techniques applied here to elucidate the neural substrate of some types of nociception and also to evaluate various means of relieving such pain.