Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation In Patients Research Articles

Long-term outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a propensity-score matched analysis

Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest that patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NCIM) have less favorable clinical outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are scarcely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity score-matched population of ICM or NICM patients. Methods Single-center observational registry including 246 consecutive patients with ischemic (ICM, N=166) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM, N=80) who underwent drug-resistant VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match patients in a 1:1 fashion according to the following variables: age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial VT ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. Results The PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92.3% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 35.9% with ES at presentation, and 23.2% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. Those with NICM were more likely to undergo epicardial or combined VT ablation (43.7% vs. 9.9%, P<0.001). The procedural complication rate was low (4.9%, N=7) and similar between groups (P>0.05). During a median follow-up of 27 (IQR 15–45) months, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank P=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank P=0.245) – Figure. Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32–4.14], P=0.004), NYHA class III/ IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11–4.04], P=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25–3.96], P=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence. Non-inducibility of any VT immediately after ablation was associated with significantly lower rates of VT recurrence (22.8%/ year vs. 42.4%/ year, log-rank P=0.03). Conclusion NCIM patients are at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality was similar to ICM in a propensity-matched cohort. Non-inducibility of any VT after CA is associated with better outcomes.Figure

High-density mapping-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: outcomes from a tertiary center cohort in Switzerland

Abstract Background Substrate-based ablation has emerged as a successful technique for VT ablation, especially in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with markedly reduced left ventricular function. High-density mapping catheters provide high-resolution electroanatomical maps and better discrimination of abnormal substrates and local activation in the heart chambers, making them a valuable and safe resource in the electrophysiology laboratory. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of VT ablation with ischemic cardiomyopathy. VT ablations were guided by two mapping strategies: high-density mapping using a high-density mapping catheter and conventional mapping using an ablation catheter. Methods Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy receiving VT ablation at our center between January 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively included. Procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving high-density mapping with a multielectrode-mapping catheter vs conventional mapping with a single-tip irrigated ablation catheter. Results Eighty-four patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent VT ablation were consecutively included (mean age 67 ± 12 years, mean LVEF 32 ± 11 %, 79 (94%) males). Fifty-seven (68 %) procedures were performed using high-density mapping, and 27 (32 %) conventional mapping. In the high-density mapping and conventional mapping group, the total procedure time was 256 ± 77 min vs. 232 ± 61 min (P < 0.05) and the total fluoroscopic dose was 1643 ± 204 μGy.m2 vs. 948 ± 105 μGy.m2 (P < 0.05), respectively,. However, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of acute success (84% vs 80%, P > 0.05) or major complications (5% vs 4%, P > 0.05). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years (4 - 51 months). The 1-year mortality rates were 4% vs 7% in the high-density mapping and conventional mapping groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The 3-month and 1-year single-procedural sustained VT/VF-free rates were 77% vs 59% and 74% vs 63%, respectively (P < 0.05). The 1-year incidence of sustained VT/VF recurrence was 7.0 per 100 person-years in high-density mapping group, compared with 7.4 per 100 person-years in the conventional group. Conclusions VT ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy using high-density mapping appears to be superior to conventional mapping in terms of reducing postprocedural VT/VF recurrence and a subsequent reduction of overall mortality.Figure 1Figure 2

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Fluoroless Ablation of VT in Patients With Structural Heart Disease

BackgroundCatheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically requires radiation exposure with its potential adverse health effects. A completely fluoroless ablation approach is achievable using a combination of electroanatomical mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Nonetheless, data in patients undergoing VT ablation are limited. ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease using a zero-fluoroscopy approach. MethodsThis multicenter study included consecutive patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing fluoroless VT ablation. Patients requiring epicardial access or coronary angiography were excluded. ResultsBetween 2017 and 2023 a total of 198 patients (aged 66.4 ± 13.4 years, 76% male, 48% ischemic) were included. Most patients (95.4%) underwent left ventricular (LV) mapping and/or ablation, which was conducted via transseptal route in 54.5% (n = 103), via retrograde aortic route in 43.4% (n = 82), and using a combined approach in 2.1% (n = 4). Two-thirds of patients had a cardiac device, including a biventricular device in 15%; 2 patients had a LV assist device, and 1 patient had a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The mean total procedural time was 211 ± 70 minutes, and the total radiofrequency time was 30 ± 22 minutes. During a follow-up period of 22 ± 18 months, the freedom from VT recurrence was 80%, and 7.6% of patients underwent a repeated ablation. Procedural-related complications occurred in 6 patients (3.0%). ConclusionsFluoroless ablation of VT in structural heart disease is feasible, effective, and safe when epicardial mapping/ablation is not required.

Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A propensity-score matched analysis

Introduction and objectivesCatheter ablation (CA) is effective in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although some observational data suggest patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) have less favorable outcomes when compared to those with an ischemic etiology (ICM), direct comparisons are rarely reported. We aimed to compare the outcomes of VT ablation in a propensity-score matched population of ICM or NICM patients. MethodsSingle-center retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing VT ablation from 2012 to 2023. A propensity score (PS) was used to match ICM and NICM patients in a 1:1 fashion according to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA class, electrical storm (ES) at presentation, and previous endocardial ablation. The outcomes of interest were VT-free survival and all-cause mortality. ResultsThe PS yielded two groups of 71 patients each (mean age 63±10 years, 92% male, mean LVEF 35±10%, 36% with ES at presentation, and 23% with previous ablation), well matched for baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 2.3 (interquartile range IQR 1.3–3.8) years, patients with NICM had a significantly lower VT-free survival (53.5% vs. 69.0%, log-rank p=0.037), although there were no differences regarding all-cause mortality (22.5% vs. 16.9%, log-rank p=0.245). Multivariate analysis identified NICM (HR 2.34 [95% CI 1.32–4.14], p=0.004), NYHA class III/IV (HR 2.11 [95% CI 1.11–4.04], p=0.024), and chronic kidney disease (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.25–3.96], p=0.006), as independent predictors of VT recurrence. ConclusionNon-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients were at increased risk of VT recurrence after ablation, although long-term mortality did not differ.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease: What Is Known and New Perspectives.

This review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease and explore novel approaches currently developing to improve procedural and long-term outcomes. Recently published trials (PARTITA, PAUSE-SCD, and SURVIVE-VT) have demonstrated the prognostic benefit of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to current clinical practice. Advanced cardiac imaging provides a valuable pre-procedural evaluation of the arrhythmogenic substrate, identifying ablation targets non-invasively. Advanced cardiac mapping techniques allow to better characterize arrhythmogenic substrate during ablation procedure. Emerging technologies like pulsed field ablation and ultra-low temperature cryoablation show promise in ventricular tachycardia ablation. Advancements in mapping techniques, ablation technologies, and pre-procedural cardiac imaging offer promise for improving ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes in ischemic heart disease.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Desmoplakin Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundDesmoplakin (DSP) pathogenic variants are rare causes of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and often involve the right and left ventricles. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations may be required in these patients, but procedural characteristics have not been reported. ObjectivesIn this study, the authors sought to report a multicenter experience of VT ablation in patients with DSP pathogenic variants. MethodsVT ablations performed in patients with known DSP pathogenic variants were analyzed across 6 centers in 3 countries. Patient characteristics and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were reported. ResultsA total of 20 patients (13 men, median age 43 years [Q1-Q3: 41.5-53.0 years], left ventricular ejection fraction 43.0% [Q1-Q3: 41.5%-53.0%], 11 previous failed ablations) were referred for VT ablation procedures. All patients had symptomatic VTs, with ICD therapy in 19 patients. Epicardial procedures were performed in 16 of the 20 patients. VT target sites were located in the right ventricular (RV) endocardium (n = 11), the RV epicardium (n = 4), the left ventricular (LV) endocardium (n = 2) and the LV epicardium (n = 7). In 3 patients, the VT target sites were in close proximity to coronary arteries, limiting ablation. During follow-up, VTs recurred in 11 patients, and repeated ablations were performed in 9 patients. Allowing for multiple procedures, 19 of the 20 patients remained free of VT recurrence after a median follow-up of 18 months [Q1-Q3: 5-60 months]. ConclusionsPatients with DSP cardiomyopathy often have biventricular involvement, and ablation procedures often require ablation in both ventricles and the epicardium. Recurrences are not uncommon, and the pathologic substrate can be located in close proximity to epicardial coronary arteries, limiting the success rate of ablations.

Impact of repeat ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.

Recurrences of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after initial catheter ablation is a significant clinical problem. In this study, we report the efficacy and risks of repeat VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) in a tertiary single centre over a 7-year period. Two hundred ten consecutive patients referred for repeat VT ablation after previous ablation in our institution were included in the analysis (53% ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 91% males, median age 65 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 35%). After performing repeat ablation, the clinical VTs were acutely eliminated in 82% of the patients, but 46% of the cohort presented with VT recurrence during the 25-month follow-up. Repeat ablation led to a 73% reduction of shock burden in the first year and 61% reduction until the end of follow-up. Similarly, VT burden was reduced 55% in the first year and 36% until the end of the study. Fifty-two patients (25%) reached the combined endpoint of ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, or death. Advanced New York Heart Association functional class, anteroseptal substrate, and periprocedural complication after repeat ablation were associated with worse prognosis independently of the type of cardiomyopathy. While complete freedom from VT after repeat ablation in SHD was difficult to achieve, ablation led to a significant reduction in VT and shock burden. Besides advanced heart failure characteristics, anteroseptal substrate and periprocedural complications predicted a worse outcome.

Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of 1-Year Arrhythmia Recurrence after Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Structural Heart Disease.

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after catheter ablation remains a concern, emphasizing the need for precise risk assessment. We aimed to use machine learning (ML) to predict 1-month and 1-year VT recurrence following VT ablation. For 337 patients undergoing VT ablation, we collected 31 parameters including medical history, echocardiography, and procedural data. 17 relevant features were included in the ML-based feature selection, which yielded six and five optimal features for 1-month and 1-year recurrence, respectively. We trained several supervised machine learning models using 10-fold cross-validation for each endpoint. We observed 1-month VT recurrence was observed in 60 (18%) cases and accurately predicted using our model with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.73. Input features used were hemodynamic instability, incessant VT, ICD shock, left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE, and non-inducibility of the clinical VT at the end of the procedure. A separate model was trained for 1-year VT recurrence (observed in 117 (35%) cases) with a mean AUC of 0.71. Selected features were hemodynamic instability, the number of inducible VT morphologies, left ventricular systolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, and ICD shock. For both endpoints, a random forest model displayed the highest performance. Our ML models effectively predict VT recurrence post-ablation, aiding in identifying high-risk patients and tailoring follow-up strategies.

Use of CT Integration During Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot

Use of CT Integration During Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot

Surpoint algorithm for improved guidance of ablation for ventricular tachycardia (SURFIRE-VT): a propensity-matched study

Abstract Background Ablation Index (AI) is a novel multiparametric radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion quality metric, which incorporates contact force, time, and power in a weighted formula. AI guided strategies have been shown to be clinically effective for catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias. The utility of AI to guide ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease is not known. Objectives To assess RF ablation and procedural characteristics, safety, and long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing VT ablation using either an AI guided strategy (maximum AI target value 550) or conventional approach using traditional parameters at a large tertiary medical center. Methods Consecutive patients (n=91) undergoing initial VT ablation for both ischemic (ICM) and non-ischemic (NICM) VT at single tertiary medical center between 2017 and 2022 were examined. Patients were 1:1 propensity matched for baseline characteristics, co-morbid conditions, and antiarrhythmic use depending on whether the ablation was guided by AI or traditional lesion quality parameters. Baseline categorical variables were compared using chi square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous measures were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Linear regression was used to assess the impact of the use of AI on ablation characteristics and Cox proportional hazard model was used evaluate clinical outcomes. Results After propensity matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between AI (n=37) and non-AI (n=37) groups (Table 1). Patients undergoing an AI guided strategy had shorter average procedure duration (-30.9 minutes, 95% CI [-60.4, -1.4], p=0.04) and average time per lesion (-13.7 seconds, 95% CI [-17.9, -9.5], p <0.001), as well as a trend toward significantly lower total RF ablation duration (357 seconds, 95% CI [-776, 61.9] p=0.09) and fewer steam pops (-0.19, 95% CI [-0.40, 0.02] p = 0.08). Lesion sets were similar between AI and non-AI groups (Scar homogenization: 41% vs 27%; p=0.22, Linear: 23% vs 73%; p=0.31, elimination LPs/LAVAs: 50% vs 43%; p=0.25, Scar dechanneling: 19% vs 8%; p=0.19, Core isolation: 5% vs 11%; p=0.4) as was use of epicardial mapping and ablation (11% vs 14%; p=0.73) Inducibility of VT (70% vs 67%; p=0.8) and termination of clinical VT during ablation (11% vs 16%; p=0.17) were also similar between AI and non-AI groups. When compared to a traditional strategy, patients undergoing an AI strategy had similar hazard for VT recurrence (0.97, 95% CI [0.42 – 2.2], p=0.93) and appropriate device therapy (0.79, 95% CI [0.32 – 1.95] p=0.61). Conclusions Compared to a strategy guided by traditional lesion parameters, use of AI of 550 for VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease resulted in shorter procedure time and average time of RF delivery per lesion with similar intermediate term clinical outcomes.Table 1Figure 1

Abstract 17014: Differences in the Outcomes of Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic versus Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Catheter ablation is an effective tool to reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden. There is a lack of robust data studying the characteristics and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with ischemic (ICM) versus non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ICM vs NICM on outcomes of VT ablation. Methods: A single-center, retrospective study of patients undergoing catheter ablation for VT was conducted. Results: A total of 168 patients, undergoing 200 VT ablation procedures, were included in this study. NICM group (112 procedures) was compared to ICM group (88 procedures). Patients in the ICM group were older (66.6 ± 13.4 vs 58.9 ± 14.4 years) and had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction (65.9% vs 3.6) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (40.9% vs 1.8%). Overall, ICM group had more comorbidities like hypertension (80.7% vs 52.7%), diabetes mellitus (23.9% vs 12.5%), chronic kidney disease (45.5% vs 35.7%), stroke (17% vs 7.1%), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (36.8 ± 13.2% vs 43.1 ± 14.7%). The ICM group had lower incidence of prior cardiac valvular surgery (9.1% vs 29.5%). The inducibility of VT (93% vs 93.5%; p= 1.0) and the number of different VT morphologies induced during the case (1.9 ± 1.5 vs 2.3 ± 2.5; p=0.19) was similar between the two groups. There was no acute mortality in either group. There was a non-significant trend towards greater VT recurrence in the NICM group (43.2% vs 33.3%, p= 0.19). However, patients with NICM had a lower VT-free survival as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.05) [Figure]. Long term mortality was higher in ICM group when compared to NICM group (18.2% vs 8.9%, p<0.01). Conclusion: Patients undergoing VT ablation in the NICM group when compared to the ICM group were noted to be younger, had fewer comorbidities, and lower long-term mortality. However, they had significantly less VT-free survival, likely owing to more challenging substrate responsible for VT.

Abstract 16093: Hemodynamic Implications of Transseptal Access for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Introduction: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), and catheter ablation can be an effective treatment strategy. Although transseptal approach for LV mapping and ablation is often preferred, iatrogenic atrial septal defect (ASD) after transseptal access may theoretically result in clinically significant right-to-left shunting. The short- and long-term implications of transseptal puncture, including hemodynamic changes in LVAD patients, remain uncertain. Methods and Results: From 2013-2023, 15 LVAD patients (age 68.5±12 years; 2 women) underwent 18 VT ablation procedures with single transseptal access for LV ablation without ASD closure afterwards. Clinical VT was eliminated in 83%. No patients had prior PFO/ASD; Mean RVSP was 45mmHg, 6 (40%) had pulmonary hypertension, and 8 (53.3%) had moderate or severe RV dysfunction. All patients had previously failed at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug (amiodarone 100%; sotalol 33%; mexiletine 94%). Procedural complications occurred in 3 procedures (all related to vascular access, none directly related to transseptal access; 1 patient with interrupted IVC requiring transhepatic access had bleeding due to transection of intercostal artery requiring arterial embolization). Post-procedure echocardiograms (n=14; mean time to echo 90±116 days) showed no intra-cardiac shunting or persistent ASD. Right heart catheterization (pre: n=12; post: n=8, at mean follow-up 187±243 days) showed similar pre- and post-ablation RA pressures (11.6 vs 14.9 mmHg, p =0.24) and wedge pressures (14.9 vs 20.4 mmHg, p =0.8) with absence of significant shunting based on pre- and post-ablation arterial (95.2% vs 97.7%, p =0.06) and PA oxygen saturations (56.5% vs 51.3%, p =0.29). No episodes of clinically significant hypoxia occurred after ablation. Conclusion: Transseptal access for VT ablation can be safely performed in LVAD patients and is unlikely to result in clinically or hemodynamically significant residual shunting over long-term follow-up. Therefore, empiric ASD closure after transseptal access in all LVAD patients is likely unnecessary.

Long-term results of catheter ablation of idiopathic and structural ventricular tachycardia

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VTs) has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Ablation procedures for idiopathic VTs depends on the anatomical origin of the arrhythmias, is highly effective in certain cases, and has been implemented as afirst-line therapy in recent European guidelines. In contrast, catheter ablation of VTs in patients with structural heart disease has asignificant risk of arrhythmia recurrence. Interventional treatment for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy was studied in multiple randomized multicenter trials and it was shown that catheter ablation was more effective in arrhythmia suppression compared to conservative treatment modalities. Catheter ablation of nonischemic cardiomyopathy suffers from far higher rates of arrhythmia recurrences as documented in several long-term studies and often needs complex procedures with or without epicardial mapping and ablation. There is still no clear proof of amortality benefit from catheter ablation of VTs in patients with or without structural heart disease. Nevertheless, recent guidelines recommend catheter ablation as an alternative to implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in selected cases.

Long-term success of a multi-electrode substrate mapping and ablation strategy versus a classic single tip mapping and ablation strategy for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Over the past years, mapping and ablation techniques for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) have evolved rapidly. High Density (HD) substrate mapping is now routine and pre-procedural imaging is increasingly used. The additional value of these techniques for long-term VT-free survival is not clear. We compared baseline and procedural characteristics, procedural success, safety and outcome of mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease between two groups. (1) Low Density (LD) group: VT mapping and ablation with a 4mm single tip catheter (2) HD group: HD substrate mapping with the Pentaray (Biosense Webster, USA) or HD Grid (Abbott, USA) catheter and ablation with a 4mm single tip catheter. VT ablation was performed in 133 patients (71 patients in LD group and 62 patients in HD group). The median follow-up was 5.0 years in LD group and 2.0 years in HD group. One-, two-, and five-year VT recurrence rates were 47%, 56%, and 65% in the LD group versus 39%, 50%, and 55% in the HD group (log-rank test for VT recurrence p=.70). One-, two-, and five-year ICD shock recurrence rates were 14%, 18%, and 24% in the LD group versus 8%, 15%, and 19% in the HD group (log-rank test for ICD-shock p=.79). All-cause mortality, cardiac (non-arrhythmic), and arrhythmic death, were similar in both groups. Severe procedural complications (tamponade, stroke, or procedural death) occurred in four patients (5%, 1 vascular, 3 tamponade) in the LD group versus two patients (3%, both tamponade) in the HD group (NS). In univariate and multivariable analysis, only a higher LVEF was significantly associated with VT-free survival. HD mapping was not significantly associated with VT-free survival. Anterior infarct location and age were significantly associated with ICD recurrent shock in both univariate and multivariable analyses. In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a HD substrate mapping, and ablation strategy did not lead to higher VT-free survival and shock-free survival compared to a single tip mapping and ablation strategy. In this study, only LVF is an independent predictor for VT recurrence. Anterior infarct location and age predict recurrent ICD shocks.

Clinical outcomes and procedural characteristics of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with or without electrical storm

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening clinical condition characterized by the recurrence of three or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation within 24 hours, leading to ICD therapy. Catheter ablation of VT in patients with ES is a high-risk procedure but has been shown to reduce VT recurrence and the number of appropriate ICD therapies in patients with structural heart disease. Purpose Our study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with or without ES. Methods Our single-center study included a cohort of 39 consecutive patients (31 men, mean age=60.9±18.4 years) who underwent VT ablation between January 2020 and January 2022, 21 of them (53.8%) due to ES and 18 patients (46.2%) had an elective procedure. Clinical and procedural characteristics, VT recurrence, and mortality rates were compared between the two groups. Results Patients with ES were older than patients without ES (67.8 vs 54.2 years, p=0.004), they were mainly presented with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (85.7% vs 27.8%, p<0.0001), had a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure (90.5% vs 44.4%, p=0.001) and a more severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF: 30.8% vs 46.9%, p=0.002). During the procedure, in the ES group, all of the patients had left-sided ablation (transaortic: 80.9%, transseptal: 19.1%), while in patients without ES, 72.2% of the procedures were left-sided (p=0.04). In 8/39 patients (20.5%) endo-epicardial access was needed. The number of RF ablation points was significantly higher in the ES group (64.1 vs 36.1 points, p=0.01). Complications were detected only in the ES group: intraprocedural death occurred in one case due to an ES and consequently cardiogenic shock, and one patient had a dissection of the right femoral artery. There was no significant difference regarding procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation exposure. The in-hospital 30-day mortality was 8/21 (28.6%) in patients with ES, while no patients died in the non-ES group. During longer clinical follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence of VT episodes and mortality. Conclusion Patients presented with ES are a more vulnerable population with many comorbidities. Catheter ablation of VT in patients with ES is a more complex procedure with a higher complication rate and these patients have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of VT ablation in this patient population.

Machine learning based prediction of 1-year arrhythmia recurrence after ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Project no. NVKP_16-1–2016-0017 (’National Heart Program’) - National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary Thematic Excellence Programme (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening condition. Catheter ablation treatment is often successful, however post procedural VT recurrence still remains an issue. Therefore, there is a demand for an accurate risk stratification system to assess the probability of arrhythmia recurrence after the procedure. Objective We aimed to implement a machine learning (ML) pipeline to predict 1-year VT recurrence in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) undergoing VT ablation. Methods For 297 patients who underwent VT ablation, we collected medical history, laboratory, echocardiography, and procedural data. Following manual and ML-based feature selection, we trained several supervised machine learning models to predict 1-month and 1-year recurrence. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to quantify the models’ performance. Results 1-year VT recurrence was observed in 107 (36%) cases. The best predictions of VT recurrence were demonstrated by random forest models utilizing 7 input features [1-month AUC: 0.74; 1-year AUC: 0.76]. These models significantly outperformed a previously published risk score, the I-VT score [AUC: 0.63, p=0.024] on our data. The most important predictors of recurrence were the number of VT morphologies during the procedure, electrical storm, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end systolic diameter, and the severity of mitral regurgitation. Conclusion Our machine learning model can efficiently predict VT recurrence in SHD patients undergoing VT ablation. Thus, it could facilitate the prompt identification of high-risk patients and the personalization of treatment and follow-up strategies, ultimately leading to improved outcomes.

Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation in Patients Who Underwent Cardiac Defibrillator Implantation Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis

The timing of when to perform ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) during the same hospitalization has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the use and outcomes of VT catheter ablation in patients with sustained VT receiving ICD in the same hospital stay. The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016 to 2019 was queried for all hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of VT with subsequent ICD during the same admission. Hospitalizations were later stratified according to whether a VT ablation was performed. All catheter ablation of VT were performed before ICD implantation. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality and 90-day readmission. A total of 29,385 VT hospitalizations were included. VT ablation was performed with subsequent ICD placement in 2,255 (7.6%), whereas 27,130 (92.3%) received an ICD only. No differences were found regarding in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35 to 1.9, p=0.67) and all-cause 90-day readmission rate (aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.3, p=0.16). An increase in readmission because of recurrent VT was noted in the VT ablation group (aOR 1.53, 8% vs 5% CI 1.2 to 1.9, p <0.01); the VT ablation group encompassed a higher number of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (p <0.01), cardiogenic shock (p <0.01), and mechanical circulatory support use (p <0.01). In conclusion, the use of VT ablation in patients admitted with sustained VT is low and reserved for higher risk patients with significant co-morbidities. Despite the higher risk profile of VT ablation cohort, no differences were found in the short-term mortality and readmission rate between the groups.

A Referral Center Experience with Cerebral Protection Devices: Challenging Cardiac Thrombus in the EP Lab

Cerebral protection devices (CPD) are designed to prevent cardioembolic stroke and most evidence that exists relates to TAVR procedures. There are missing data on the benefits of CPD in patients that are considered high risk for stroke undergoing cardiac procedures like left atrial appendage (LAA) closure or catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) when cardiac thrombus is present. This work aimed to examine the feasibility and safety of the routine use of CPD in patients with cardiac thrombus undergoing interventions in the electrophysiology (EP) lab of a large referral center. The CPD was placed under fluoroscopic guidance in all procedures in the beginning of the intervention. Two different CPDs were used according to the physician's discretion: (1) a capture device consisting of two filters for the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries placed over a 6F sheath from a radial artery; or (2) a deflection device covering all three supra-aortic vessels placed over an 8F femoral sheath. Retrospective periprocedural and safety data were obtained from procedural reports and discharge letters. Long-term safety data were obtained by clinical follow-up in our institution and telephone consultations. We identified 30 consecutive patients in our EP lab who underwent interventions (21 LAA closure, 9 VT ablation) with placement of a CPD due to cardiac thrombus. Mean age was 70 ± 10 years and 73% were male, while mean LVEF was 40 ± 14%. The location of the cardiac thrombus was the LAA in all 21 patients (100%) undergoing LAA-closure, whereas, in the 9 patients undergoing VT ablation, thrombus was present in the LAA in 5 cases (56%), left ventricle (n = 3, 33%) and aortic arch (n = 1, 11%). The capture device was used in 19 out of 30 (63%) and the deflection device in 11 out of 30 cases (37%). There were no periprocedural strokes or transitory ischemic attacks (TIA). CPD-related complications comprised the vascular access and were as follows: two cases of pseudoaneurysm of the femoral artery not requiring surgery (7%), 1 hematoma at the arterial puncture site (3%) and 1 venous thrombosis (3%) resolved by warfarin. At long-term follow-up, 1 TIA and 2 non-cardiovascular deaths occurred, with a mean follow-up time of 660 days. Placement of a cerebral protection device prior to LAA closure or VT ablation in patients with cardiac thrombus proved feasible, but possible vascular complications needed to be taken into account. A benefit in periprocedural stroke prevention for these interventions seemed plausible but has yet to be proven in larger and randomized trials.

Acute and long-term success of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease in a Mexican center

Objective. To report the results of ventricular tachycardia (VT) catheter ablation in ischemic heart disease (IHD), and to identify risk factors associated with recurrence in a Mexican center. Materials and methods. We made a retrospective review of the cases of VT ablation performed in our center from 2015 to 2022. We analyzed the characteristics of the patients and those of the procedures separately and we determined factors associated with recurrence. Results. Fifty procedures were performed in 38 patients (84% male; mean age 58.1 years). Acute success rate was 82%, with a 28% of recurrences. Female sex (OR 3.33, IC 95% 1.66–6.68, p=0.006), atrial fibrillation (OR 3.5, IC 95% 2.08–5.9, p=0.012), electrical storm (OR 2.4, IC 95% 1.06–5.41, p=0.045), functional class greater than II (OR 2.86, IC 95% 1.34–6.10, p=0.018) were risk factors for recurrence and the presence of clinical VT at the time of ablation (OR0.29, IC95% 0.12–0.70, p=0.004) and the use of more than 2 techniques for mapping (OR 0.64, IC 95% 0.48–0.86, p=0.013) were protective factors. Conclusions. Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic heart disease has had good results in our center. The recurrence is similar to that reported by other authors and there are some factors associated with it.

Sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: A real-world systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sex differences have diversely affected cardiac diseases. Little is known whether these differences impact outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). To assess the impact of sex differences on outcomes of catheter ablation of VT. Databases were searched from inception through December 2021. Effect estimates from individual studies were extracted and combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. The outcomes of interest included VT recurrence rates, all-cause mortality, and composite outcomes of mortality, left ventricular assistant device use, and heart transplantation following VT ablation. Our analysis included 22 observational studies. There were 10,206 patients, of which 12.8% were women. We found no statistical difference between sexes for VT recurrence rate (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, P = .57, I 2 = 14.9%). Similarly, there was statistical difference in neither all-cause mortality nor composite outcomes (pooled HR 0.93, P = .75, I 2 = 59.1% and pooled HR 0.9, P = .33, I 2 = 0%, respectively). There was a trend toward an increase in women undergoing VT ablation in the recent registries (P = .071). Our contemporary analysis suggests that sex may have no impact on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of VT in patients with structural heart disease, though women are the underrepresented. However, recent VT ablation registries have involved more women in their studies. Future studies with a higher proportion of women are encouraged to verify the current perception.