BackgroundTranscatheter device closure is a well-established treatment for suitable ventricular septal defects (VSDs). The Cocoon Membranous VSD Occluder is a relatively new device specifically designed for perimembranous VSDs. Existing research on the Cocoon Membranous VSD Occluder for closing PM VSD is limited. ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe a single-center experience using the Cocoon Membranous VSD Occluder for perimembranous VSD. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent device closure of perimembranous VSD using the Cocoon occluder between May 2023 and April 2024. Procedural success, complications, and short-term outcomes were evaluated. ResultsBetween May 2023 and April 2024, 13 patients with perimembranous VSD and left-to-right shunt underwent device closure with the Cocoon Membranous VSD Occluder. Twelve patients (92.3 %) achieved successful VSD closure. The mean age was 8.06 years with standard deviation (SD) of 7.24 years. The mean weight was 11.98 kg with SD of 18.93 kg. The mean VSD size was 4.96 mm with SD of 0.92 mm. The VSD was crossed from the right ventricle in 5 patients and from the left ventricle in 9 patients. All patients had successful device placement from the right ventricle approach. The Cocoon Membranous VSD device size ranged from 6 to 4 mm to 12–4 mm. In one smaller patient, the device was electively removed due to significant flow through an additional exit, and the patient subsequently underwent surgery. Another patient developed hemoglobinuria on the fourth day, which resolved by the tenth day with hydration therapy. Two patients experienced trivial to mild aortic regurgitation, and one had Wenckebach phenomenon that resolved the next day. In the short-term follow-up (mean duration of 4.33 months), all patients were doing well, had good device performance, and showed no evidence of heart block. ConclusionsDevice closure of perimembranous VSD in infants with the Cocoon Membranous VSD Occluder appears to be safe and effective in carefully selected patients during short-term follow-up. Larger studies with long-term data are necessary for future recommendations.
Read full abstract