Venous Thromboembolism In Trauma Research Articles

Addition of aspirin to venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis safely decreases venous thromboembolism rates in trauma patients

BackgroundTrauma patients exhibit a multifactorial hypercoagulable state and have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite early and aggressive chemoprophylaxis (CP) with various heparin compounds (“standard” CP; sCP), VTE rates...

Approaches for optimizing venous thromboembolism prevention in injured patients: Findings from the consensus conference to implement optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major issue in trauma patients. Without prophylaxis, the rate of deep venous thrombosis approaches 60% and even with chemoprophylaxis may be nearly 30%. Advances in VTE reduction are imperative to reduce the burden of this issue in the trauma population. Novel approaches in VTE prevention may include new medications, dosing regimens, and extending prophylaxis to the postdischarge phase of care. Standard dosing regimens of low-molecular-weight heparin are insufficient in trauma, shifting our focus toward alternative dosing strategies to improve prophylaxis. Mixed data suggest that anti-Xa-guided dosage, weight-based dosing, and thromboelastography are among these potential strategies. The concern for VTE in trauma does not end upon discharge, however. The risk for VTE in this population extends well beyond hospitalization. Variable extended thromboprophylaxis regimens using aspirin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants have been suggested to mitigate this prolonged VTE risk, but the ideal approach for outpatient VTE prevention is still unclear. As part of the 2022 Consensus Conference to Implement Optimal Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Trauma, a multidisciplinary array of participants, including physicians from multiple specialties, pharmacists, nurses, advanced practice providers, and patients met to attack these issues. This paper aims to review the current literature on novel approaches for optimizing VTE prevention in injured patients and identify research gaps that should be investigated to improve VTE rates in trauma.

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma: The Role of Anticoagulation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality among patients with severe trauma. Historically, prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) were used in high-risk trauma patients with suspected risk factors for VTE, including prolonged immobilization, and concurrent contraindication to anticoagulation. Mounting data regarding the efficacy of IVCF in this cohort, as well as concerns regarding morbidity of an in situ IVCF, have challenged this practice paradigm. In this review, we discuss the comanagement of VTE and trauma, including anticoagulation and the use of IVCF.

Clinical Characteristics, Management Practices, and In-hospital Outcomes among Trauma Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Background:We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, management practices, and inhospital outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among trauma patients.Methods:A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients with documented venous thromboembolic events in a level 1 trauma center was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the primary initial presentation postinjury (deep-vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]).Results:Across the study period, a total of 662 patients were confirmed to have DVT and 258 patients were diagnosed with acute PE. Among them, 84 patients were identified to have trauma-associated VTE; 56 (8.5%) had DVT and 28 (10.9%) had PE. Two patients who initially presented with DVT developed PE on follow-up. There were 38 females and 46 males with a mean age of 46 ± 18 years. Abnormal coagulation profile was reported as 7 protein C deficiencies, 5 protein S deficiencies, 6 homocystinemia, 4 antithrombin III deficiency, 4 lupus anticoagulant, and 2 Factor V Leiden. Age, sex, obesity, D-dimer level, and treatment (except for heparin) were comparable between the two groups; whereas protein S deficiency, prior history of PE, bedridden status, congestive heart failure, and history of recent surgery, were more evident in the PE group. The incidence of postthrombotic syndrome was significantly higher in the DVT group. Overall mortality rate was 8.3% (DVT; 8.9% vs. PE; 7.1%, respectively = 0.78).Conclusion:Coagulation profile plays an important role in posttraumatic thromboembolic disease. A thorough assessment for features of thromboembolic disorders is warranted in polytrauma patients to avoid missing this potentially life-threatening diagnosis. Larger studies are needed for better understanding and management of VTE in trauma.

Improving Pharmacologic Prevention of VTE in Trauma: IMPACT-IT QI Project

Enoxaparin regimens commonly used for prophylaxis fail to achieve optimal anti-factor Xa levels in up to 70 per cent of trauma patients. Accordingly, trauma services at the study institution endeavored to develop a standardized approach to optimize pharmacologic prevention with enoxaparin. An enoxaparin venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis protocol implemented in October 2015 provided weight-adjusted initial dosing parameters with subsequent dose titration to achieve targeted anti-factor Xa levels. Symptomatic VTE rate was evaluated 12 months pre- and post-implementation. Data were obtained from the trauma registry and charts were reviewed from electronic medical records. The rate of symptomatic VTE significantly declined post-implementation (2.0% vs 0.9%, P = 0.009). Enoxaparin use was comparable in these two phases validating that the decline in symptomatic VTEs was not due to an increase in enoxaparin use. Symptomatic VTE rate for patients who received enoxaparin in the post-implementation cohort decreased from 3.2 to 1.0 per cent (P = 0.023, 95% confidence interval = 0.124-0.856). There was also a significant decrease in the rate of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (2.8% vs 0.9%, P = 0.040, 95% confidence interval = 0.117-0.950). This approach to VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin resulted in a significant reduction in symptomatic VTE rates. Implementation of similar practices may be equally impactful in other institutions that use enoxaparin.

Deep vein thrombosis and venous thromboembolism in trauma.

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus are major causes of hospital-related morbidity and mortality, and are recognized as complications in patients with traumatic injury. Despite the significant morbidity and mortality associated with DVTs, prophylaxis and treatment are still not well understood and remain the subject of research and debate. Elements of the patient's history and physical examination, along with thromboelastography, can be used to predict patients who are at greatest risk of DVT and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Novel assays and biomarkers hold promise for more accurate evaluation of coagulation status. Patients with traumatic injury are routinely treated with either mechanical or pharmacological treatments to prevent DVT, and a growing body of evidence suggests that DVT prophylaxis should be initiated as early as possible in a patient's hospital course. In trauma patients with traumatic injury, early identification and targeted VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients may prevent this life-threatening complication.

Does diabetes type increase the odds of venous thromboembolism following traumatic injury?

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a clinically significant complication after trauma even though screening and prophylaxis strategies for at-risk patients have substantially reduced incidence. Our study sought to determine if diabetes, a condition that promotes thrombi formation, is associated with developing a VTE in trauma patients.MethodsThe registries of 2 level I and a level II trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed for consecutively admitted trauma patients over a 6-year period. Demographics, VTE risk factors, injury characteristics, and VTE incidence were univariately compared between patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and no diabetes. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of VTE; results were further stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and presented as adjusted ORs (AOR).ResultsOf the 26 934 total patients, 779 (2.9%) had IDDM, 2052 (7.6%) had NIDDM, and the remaining 89.5% were without diabetes. VTE incidence was 3.6%, 2.4%, and 2.2%, in IDDM, NIDDM, and non-diabetes, respectively (p=0.02). After adjustment for established and significant risk factors, neither IDDM (AOR=1.43, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.15, p=0.09) nor NIDDM (AOR=1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.40, p=0.88) was associated with increased odds of developing a VTE. Patients ≥65 years developed VTE more frequently than those <65 years (2.5% vs 2.1%, p=0.04). Among patients <65 years, IDDM was significantly predictive of VTE (AOR=1.86, 95% CI 1.01–3.41, p=0.045), but NIDDM was not. For patients ≥65 years, neither type of diabetes was predictive of VTE.ConclusionsVTE incidence was ∼2 times higher among injured patients <65 years with IDDM versus no diabetes. Overall, we did not find an increased risk of VTE in patients with any diabetes. Additional studies are needed before a recommendation on VTE screening or prophylaxis in IDDM can be made.Level of evidenceLevel III, therapeutic/care management.

The Effectiveness of Prophylactic Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Trauma Patients

Trauma is known to be one of the strongest risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE). Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for prevention of PE, but trauma places some patients at risk of excess bleeding. Experts are divided on the role of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filters to prevent PE. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the comparative effectiveness of prophylactic IVC filters in trauma patients, particularly in preventing PE, fatal PE, and mortality. We searched the following databases for primary studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, clinicaltrial.gov, and the Cochrane Library (all through July 31, 2012). We developed a search strategy using medical subject headings terms and text words of key articles that we identified a priori. We reviewed the references of all included articles, relevant review articles, and related systematic reviews to identify articles the database searches might have missed. We reviewed titles followed by abstracts to identify randomized clinical trials or observational studies with comparison groups reporting on the effectiveness and/or safety of IVC filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma patients. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and abstracted data. For studies amenable to pooling with meta-analysis, we pooled using the random-effects model to analyze the relative risks. We graded the quantity, quality, and consistency of the evidence by adapting an evidence-grading scheme recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Eight controlled studies compared the effectiveness of no IVC filter vs IVC filter on PE, fatal PE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or mortality in trauma patients. Evidence showed a consistent reduction of PE (relative risk, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.70]; I(2)=0%) and fatal PE (0.09 [0.01-0.81]; I(2)=0%) with IVC filter placement, without any statistical heterogeneity. We found no significant difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (relative risk, 1.76 [95% CI, 0.50-6.19]; P=.38; I(2)=56.8%) or mortality (0.70 [0.40-1.23]; I(2)=6.7%). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 additional PE with IVC filters is estimated to range from 109 (95% CI, 93-190) to 962 (819-2565), depending on the baseline PE risk. The strength of evidence is low but supports the association of IVC filter placement with a lower incidence of PE and fatal PE in trauma patients. Which patients experience benefit enough to outweigh the harms associated with IVC filter placement remains unclear. Additional well-designed observational or prospective cohort studies may be informative.

Obese patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism in trauma

Obese patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism in trauma

Improved Prophylaxis and Decreased Rates of Preventable Harm With the Use of a Mandatory Computerized Clinical Decision Support Tool for Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma

Venous thromboembolism is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and is largely preventable. Despite this fact, appropriate prophylaxis is vastly underutilized. To improve compliance with best practice prophylaxis for VTE in hospitalized trauma patients, we implemented a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool. The system required completion of checklists of VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacologic prophylaxis. With this tool, we were able to determine a patient's risk stratification level and recommend appropriate prophylaxis. To evaluate the effect of our mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool on compliance with prophylaxis guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE outcomes among admitted adult trauma patients. Retrospective cohort study (from January 2007 through December 2010). University-based, state-designated level 1 adult trauma center. A total of 1599 hospitalized adult trauma patients with a hospital length of stay greater than 1 day. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who were ordered risk-appropriate guideline-suggested VTE prophylaxis. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with any preventable VTE (defined as VTE in a patient not ordered guideline-appropriate VTE prophylaxis), pulmonary embolism, and/or deep vein thrombosis. Compliance with guideline-appropriate prophylaxis increased from 66.2% to 84.4% (P < .001). The rate of preventable harm from VTE decreased from 1.0% to 0.17% (P = .04). Implementation of a mandatory computerized provider order entry-based clinical decision support tool significantly improved compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines in hospitalized adult trauma patients. This improved compliance was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of preventable harm, which was defined as VTE events in patients not ordered appropriate prophylaxis.

Removal of retrievable vena cava filters in routine practice: A multicenter study

Vena cava filters (VCFs) are used to prevent pulmonary embolism when anticoagulation is contraindicated or in the event of progression of thrombosis despite adequate anticoagulation. Retrievable VCFs provide a potential advantage over permanent VCFs, but the appropriateness of their use and the frequency with which they are removed is not well established. Objectives Document the indications for insertion of retrievable VCFs, filter removal in hospital practice. Methods Observational study conducted in three academic medical centers. Consecutive patients undergoing retrievable VCF insertion were identified. Clinical data was extracted from the patients' charts and follow up data were obtained from treating physicians after discharge. Results 300 patients were studied. The indication for filter insertion was acute bleeding (46.1%) or surgery (24.2%) in patients with acute thrombosis, prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma (13.3%), potential bleeding in patients with deep vein thrombosis (9.1%) thromboembolism while on adequate anticoagulation (5.7%) and other (1.3%). 21 (7%) filters were removed. An unsuccessful attempt at retrieval was undertaken in a further 9 (3%) patients. Conclusions The use of retrievable VCFs was appropriate, with the possible exception of their prophylactic use in major trauma. The majority of VCFs were not removed, for reasons that are not apparent.

Editorial [Hot topic: An Update on Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma, Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery (Guest Editors: Peter V. Giannoudis and Panayotis N. Soucacos)

Editorial [Hot topic: An Update on Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma, Orthopaedic and Reconstructive Surgery (Guest Editors: Peter V. Giannoudis and Panayotis N. Soucacos)

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma: An Update for the Intensive Care Unit Practitioner

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients is a capricious problem that continues to plague trauma surgeons and critical care physicians alike. Pharmacologic preventions of VTE with anticoagulants are often contraindicated in the trauma patient because of risk of bleeding diathesis. Mechanical prophylaxis in the form of venous compression boots often cannot be placed because of external fixators, swelling, and so forth. Providing effective VTE prophylaxis, while at the same time providing definitive care for the trauma patient, can be a nightmare. This review will first discuss the incidence and prevalence of VTE, as well as investigate the condition's diagnosis and treatment. Solutions to frequently encountered clinical dilemmas in managing VTE in trauma patients are considered in the form of frequently asked questions. Diagnostic techniques such as magnetic resonance venography, D-dimer, and various computed tomography methods are evaluated. Recent literature on preventive pharmacologic therapies is explored. The authors also consider whether vena cava filters prevent pulmonary embolism in trauma patients.

Venous thromboembolism in trauma: a local manifestation of systemic hypercoagulability?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of systemic hypercoagulability, preexisting and acquired risk factors, and specific injury patterns in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after injury. Injured patients with an Injury Severity Score > or = 15 were followed with lower extremity venous duplex ultrasonography, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, and quantitative D-dimer levels at 1 and 3 days and then weekly until discharge. Among 101 patients with a mean Injury Severity Score of 27.3 +/- 10.5 followed for 12.4 +/- 8.7 days, 28 (27.7%) developed a lower extremity thrombosis, 2 (1.9%) sustained a pulmonary embolism, and 1 (0.9%) had a symptomatic upper extremity thrombosis. Although admission fragment 1 + 2 and D-dimer levels were elevated in 81.4% and 100% of patients, respectively, mean levels were not significantly different in those with or without VTE. VTE was more common (p < 0.05) among those with obesity, age > 40 years, immobilization for > 3 days, spine fractures, and lower extremity fractures. However, only obesity (p = 0.004) and immobilization > 3 days (p = 0.05) were independent predictors of VTE in a multivariate analysis. Although elevated in seriously injured patients, neither markers of activated coagulation nor specific injury patterns are predictive of VTE. Associations with immobilization and obesity suggest that VTE after injury is a systemic hypercoagulable disorder with local manifestations of thrombosis related to lower extremity stasis.

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in trauma and long bone fractures.

Patients sustaining traumatic injuries are at high risk for the development of venous thromboembolism. The reported incidence of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients ranges from 20 to 90%. The reported incidence of pulmonary embolism in trauma patients varies between 2.3 and 22%. The aging population and the survival of more severely injured patients may suggest an increasing risk of thromboembolism in the trauma patient population. There have been few randomized prospective studies assessing methods of thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients. Controversy exists as to the optimal method of prophylaxis in this high-risk population. Contraindications arising from associated injuries often limit the potential options for prophylaxis in patients with trauma. Large prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the most effective means of prophylaxis in trauma patients, who have a wide range of both isolated and combined injuries. Future studies should also address the duration of prophylaxis because many trauma patients remain immobile for an extended time.

Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma—A Prospective Study

Geerts, William H.; Nanez, H.; Pagliarello, G.; Saibil, E.; Szalai, J. P. Author Information