We previously reported that in women with symptomatic pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) secondary to combined iliac vein stenosis (IVS) and ovarian vein reflux (OVR), treated with iliac vein stenting alone that 78% reported complete symptom resolution up to six months. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the long-term effectiveness of this treatment strategy, the post-stent re-intervention rate and the incidence of post-stent ovarian vein embolization (OVE) for residual symptoms. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data at the Center for Vascular Medicine was performed. We investigated women with pelvic pain or dyspareunia secondary to combined IVS and OVR who were treated with stenting alone. Patients whose primary complaint was dysmenorrhea and/or leg symptoms were excluded from the analysis. Assessments and interventions consisted of an evaluation for other causes of PeVD by a gynecologist, documentation of pre, three, six, 12, 24 and 36 month visual analog pain scores (VAS), trans-abdominal duplex ultrasound, stent type, diameter, length, vein territory covered and reintervention rates. All patients underwent diagnostic venography of their pelvic, left ovarian veins, pelvic reservoirs and intra-vascular ultrasonography of their iliac veins. From February 2018 to January 2023, 141 women with a pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) secondary to IVS and OVR were identified. Average age was 44.7±10.5 years with 3.18±1.82 pregnancies. Average follow-up time for the entire cohort was 12±12.1 months (Median: 10.65 months). Types of stents were the following: Venovo 48 (34%), Wallstent 14 (10%) Abre 79 (56%). Most common diameter and stent lengths utilized were 14 and 16mm and 140 and 150mm respectively. Most common vein territories covered were the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the left external iliac vein in 83% and IVC to right external iliac vein in 13%. Pelvic and dyspareunia VAS scores pre-intervention, 3,6, 12, 24 and 36 months post intervention were as follows: 6.4±73 (n=141), 2.6± 3.3(n=98), 1.71±2.83 (n=77), 2.04±3.5 (n=76), 2.4±3.7 (n=30) and 1.15±3 (n=13) (p≤0.001). Of the entire cohort no patients required OVE and pelvic reservoir embolization. Pelvic reservoirs were present in 113/141 (83%) patients. Stent reinterventions were required in 19/141 (13%) patients. The majority of women with pelvic pain secondary to combined IVS and OVR achieved near complete symptom resolution with iliac vein stenting alone despite the presence of a pelvic reservoir in 83% of patients. Although most women complained of some minimal residual pelvic pain or dyspareunia, the majority were satisfied with their outcomes and did not require further intervention. In this patient population, iliac vein stenting should be considered the primary treatment modality. OVE should be reserved for patients with persistent or recurrent pelvic pain unresolved with stenting.