Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Life Support Research Articles

Arterial Limb Complications of Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult and Pediatric Populations

Arterial Limb Complications of Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult and Pediatric Populations

Extracorporeal Life Support Use in Mixed Distributive-Obstructive Shock following an Electrical Injury: A Case Report.

Electrical burn injuries can be catastrophic, threatening severe disability or mortality. We present a patient who suffered from electrical shock, requiring bilateral above knee amputations, right trans-radial amputation, renal replacement therapy, and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA ECLS) therapy. While there exist reports of cases that have demonstrated the potential use of ECLS in burn patients with cardiogenic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), this is a unique case of VA ECLS use for an electrical injury patient who developed mixed distributive-obstructive shock secondary to pulmonary embolism and sepsis. Given the wide variety of morbidities that can result from electrical burns, VA ECLS is a promising tool for those who require cardiopulmonary support refractory to traditional measures.

(247) - Outcomes of Transport on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients

(247) - Outcomes of Transport on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock Patients

(564) - Relation Between Indexed Surgery and Outcomes in Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support

(564) - Relation Between Indexed Surgery and Outcomes in Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support

Single arterial access technique for simultaneous dual mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Temporary mechanical circulatory support is a treatment of choice for patients in severe cardiogenic shock. Combining veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) with devices that enable left ventricular unloading emerges as a promising strategy to diminish detrimental effect of elevated left ventricular afterload and to improve survival. However, the need to establish multiple arterial access sites remains a major drawback of this approach due to a significant rate of vascular complications. We describe herein a case of a single arterial access for ECLS and intra-aortic balloon pump using axillary artery that may provide a simple, modular and flexible approach for escalation or de-escalation of mechanical circulatory support.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support Use in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Shows Favorable Outcomes

BackgroundDifferences in outcomes by indication for venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) are poorly described. We hypothesized that patients on VA-ECLS for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have fewer complications and better survival than patients on VA-ECLS for other indications. MethodsAll patients ≥18 years on VA-ECLS from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization global registry (2010-2019) were evaluated (n = 29,842). After excluding patients aged >79 years (n = 729) and those with incomplete indication data (n = 2530), patients were stratified by VA-ECLS indication for PE vs all other indications. The association between being discharged alive and each type of complication with VA-ECLS indication was assessed. ResultsOf 26,583 patients included in the analysis, 978 (3.7%) were on VA-ECLS for a primary diagnosis of acute PE. Acute PE patients were younger (53.1 vs 56.7 years, P < .001) and were more likely to be women (52.1% vs 32.3%, P < .001). Patients who underwent VA-ECLS for acute PE were 78% more likely to be discharged alive vs patients supported with VA-ECLS for other reasons (P < .001). Acute PE patients had fewer cardiovascular and renal complications (26.6% vs 38.0% and 31.1% vs 39.4%, respectively; adjusted P < .001). Acute PE patients had higher odds of having clots and mechanical complications (8.7% vs 7.9% and 16.7% vs 14.6%, respectively; adjusted P < .001). ConclusionsPatients undergoing VA-ECLS for acute PE have higher odds of survival to hospital discharge compared with those supported for other indications. Additionally, VA-ECLS in this population is associated with fewer cardiovascular and renal complications but higher mechanical complications.

Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategies in Takotsubo Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review.

Takotsubo syndrome is, by definition, a reversible form of acute heart failure. If cardiac output is severely reduced, Takotsubo syndrome can cause cardiogenic shock, and mechanical circulatory support can serve as a bridge to recovery. To date, there are no recommendations on when to use mechanical circulatory support and on which device is particularly effective in this context. Our aim was to determine the best treatment strategy. A systematic literature research and analysis of individual patient data was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines. Our research considered original works published until 31 July 2023. A total of 93 publications that met the inclusion criteria were identified, providing individual data from 124 patients. Of these, 62 (50%) were treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (va-ECLS), and 44 (35.5%) received a microaxial left ventricular assist device (Impella). Eighteen patients received an Impella CP and twenty-one an Impella 2.5. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) without other devices was used in only 13 patients (10.5%), while other devices (BiVAD or Tandem Heart) were used in 5 patients (4%). The median initial left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%, with no difference between the four device groups except for the IABP group, which was less affected by cardiac output failure (p = 0.015). The overall survival was 86.3%. Compared to the other groups, the time to cardiac recovery was shorter with Impella (p < 0.001). Though the Impella treatment is new, our analysis may show a significant benefit of Impella compared to other MCS strategies for cardiogenic shock in Takotsubo syndrome.

Approach to traumatic cardiac arrest in the emergency department: a narrative literature review for emergency providers.

Traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is a major contributor to mortality and morbidity in all age groups and poses a significant burden on the healthcare system. Although there have been advances in treatment modalities, survival rates for TCA patients remain low. This narrative literature review critically examines the indications and effectiveness of current therapeutic approaches in treating TCA. We performed a literature search in the PubMed and Scopus databases for studies published before December 31, 2022. The search was refined by combining search terms, examining relevant study references, and restricting publications to the English language. Following the search, 943 articles were retrieved, and two independent reviewers conducted a screening process. A review of various studies on pre- and intra-arrest prognostic factors showed that survival rates were higher when patients had an initial shockable rhythm. There were conflicting results regarding other prognostic factors, such as witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and the use of prehospital or in-hospital epinephrine. Emergency thoracotomy was found to result in more favorable outcomes in cases of penetrating trauma than in those with blunt trauma. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) provides an advantage to emergency thoracotomy in terms of occupational safety for the operator as an alternative in managing hemorrhagic shock. When implemented in the setting of aortic occlusion, emergency thoracotomy and REBOA resulted in comparable mortality rates. Veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) and veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) are viable options for treating respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock, respectively. In the context of traumatic injuries, V-V ECLS has been associated with higher rates of survival to discharge than V-A ECLS. TCA remains a significant challenge for emergency medical services due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. Pre- and intra-arrest prognostic factors can help identify patients who are likely to benefit from aggressive and resource-intensive resuscitation measures. Further research is needed to enhance guidelines for the clinical use of established and emerging therapeutic approaches that can help optimize treatment efficacy and ameliorate survival outcomes.

Abstract 109: Nitric Oxide Added to the ECMO Circuit Improves Neuroprotection and Cardiac Function After Cardiac Arrest

Background: Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly used in patients during cardiac arrest. Nitric Oxide (NO) has shown potential for exerting a protective role in ischemia/reperfusion damage in different organs. Aim: This study aims to investigate the cardio and neuroprotective effects of NO administered in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit after cardiac arrest. Methods: Thirty male SD rats were subjected to 10 minutes of cardiac arrest. They were randomly assigned to receive ECMO or ECMO plus NO (20 ppm) administered in the oxygenator (ECMO+NO). After 1 hour, the animals were weaned from ECMO, hemodynamic analysis using pressure-volume miniaturized catheter, and cardiac and brain samples were collected after two hours. Results: Analysis of cardiac function showed improved systolic cardiac function in the ECMO+NO group compared to standard ECMO (stroke volume: 55 ± 8 vs. 26 ± 9 μl, cardiac index: 9.05 ± 1.41 vs. 4.70 ± 0.81 ml/min/100g, dP/dt max : 6870 ± 290 vs. 5124 ± 205 mmHg/s; p&lt;0.01). The ECMO+NO group also exhibited reduced systemic resistance (total peripheral resistance: 2.14 ± 0.42 vs. 2.95 ± 0.35 mmHg/ml/min/100g; p&lt;0.05) and improved ventricular-arterial coupling (Ees/Ea: 0.96 ± 0.15 vs. 0.53 ± 0.15; p&lt;0.001). Neuroinflammation, assessed by the expression of Iba1, a microglia activation marker, was attenuated in the ECMO+NO group (8.37 ± 0.41% vs. 12.58 ± 0.48%; p &lt; 0.001). The extent of hypoxic brain areas, analyzed by thiol oxidation, was lower in the ECMO+NO group (4.07 ± 0.45% vs. 11.72 ± 1.03%; p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: NO administration in the oxygenator during ECMO after cardiac arrest improves cardiac function and ventricular-arterial coupling and enhances neuroprotection decreasing neuroinflammation and hypoxic areas. NO administration in the ECMO circuit might be a promising therapeutic adjunct during ECLS.

Long-term outcomes of patients bridged to recovery with venoarterial extracorporeal life support.

Our study examines the long-term outcomes of patients discharged from the hospital without heart replacement therapy (HRT) after recovery from cardiogenic shock using venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS). We retrospectively reviewed 615 cardiogenic shock patients who recovered from VA-ECLS at our institution between January 2015 and July 2021. Of those, 166 patients (27.0%) who recovered from VA-ECLS without HRT were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, discharge labs, vitals, electrocardiograms and echocardiograms were assessed. Patients were contacted to determine vital status. The primary outcome was post-discharge mortality. Of 166 patients, 158 patients (95.2%) had post-discharge follow-up, with a median time of follow-up of 2years (IQR: [1 year, 4 years]). At discharge, the median ejection fraction (EF) was 52.5% (IQR: [32.5, 57.5]). At discharge, 92 patients (56%) were prescribed β-blockers, 28 (17%) were prescribed an ACE inhibitor, ARB or ARNI, and 50 (30%) were prescribed loop diuretics. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 1-year survival rate of 85.6% (95% CI: [80.1%, 91.2%]) and a 5-year survival rate of 60.6% (95% CI: [49.9%, 71.3%]). A Cox regression model demonstrated that a history of congestive heart failure (CHF) was strongly predictive of increased mortality hazard (HR = 1.929; p = 0.036), while neither discharge EF nor etiology of VA-ECLS were associated with increased post-discharge mortality. Patients discharged from the hospital after full myocardial recovery from VA-ECLS support without HRT should have close outpatient follow-up due to the risk of recurrent heart failure and increased mortality in these patients.

Carotid Artery Patency and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Decannulation in Pediatric Extracorporeal Life Support

IntroductionDecannulation from veno-arterial extracorporeal life support may involve ligation or repair of the carotid artery; however, differences in outcomes are not clear. This study aimed to describe short- and long-term artery patency and neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonatal and pediatric patients who underwent carotid artery repair (CAR) versus ligation at decannulation. MethodsPatients supported on veno-arterial extracorporeal life support during the first 15 mo of life from 2010 to 2020 at a large, tertiary care children's hospital were included. Decannulation strategy, postdecannulation imaging, and follow-up visits were reviewed. Results74 patients were identified with median age at cannulation 2 d (interquartile range [IQR] = 1-21 d) and median weight 3.7 kg (interquartile range= 3.2-4.4 kg). Indications included congenital cardiac conditions (27%), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (19%), pulmonary hypertension (19%), meconium aspiration (16%), and pneumonia/sepsis (14%). Forty-two patients (57%) underwent CAR. Patients on extracorporeal life support >5 d were 95% less likely to undergo CAR (P < 0.001). Of CAR patients, 18 (43%) had doppler ultrasound performed within the 2-y follow-up period. Ten of 18 patients (55.6%) had >50% stenosis (3) or complete occlusion (7). Only 36% (27/74) had formal neurodevelopmental follow-up within 6 mo and 41% (30/74) within 2 y; however, no significant differences in function were seen between groups. ConclusionsNeonates and young toddler patients undergoing CAR following extracorporeal life support decannulation are at risk for partial or complete artery occlusion. In our study population, repair and ligation at decannulation appear to have similar neurodevelopmental outcomes; however, follow-up to assess function is not standardized. Longer term follow-up and risk stratification are needed to guide decannulation strategy.

Comparison of survival by vasoactive-inotropic score in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal life support.

After the initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for hemodynamic support, patients often require vasopressor and inotropic medications to support their blood pressure and cardiac contractility. The vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a standardized calculation of vasopressor and inotrope equivalence, which uses coefficients for each medication to calculate a total value. This study evaluated the association between the 30-day survival of patients receiving V-A ECMO support and the VIS calculated 24 h after ECMO cannulation (VIS24). This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. The median VIS24 of the entire cohort was 6.0, and was determined as a cutoff for comparison. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 were assigned to a group, and those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 were assigned to a second group. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 had higher 30-day survival than those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 (54.5% vs 41.4%; p = 0.03). The group with a VIS24 < 6.0 also had significantly improved survival to decannulation of ECMO support; however, there was no difference in the survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a secondary analysis of quartiles and determined that individuals with a VIS24 > 11.4 had the lowest survival in the cohort. This finding may help identify patients with the lowest probability of 30-day survival in those receiving V-A ECMO for hemodynamic support.

Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock in Adult Congenital Heart Disease-An ELSO Registry Analysis.

There are minimal data on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane life support (VA-ECLS) in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS). This study sought to describe the population of ACHD patients with CS who received VA-ECLS in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry. This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with diagnoses of ACHD and CS in ELSO from 2009-2021. Anatomic complexity was categorized using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 guidelines. We described patient characteristics, complications, and outcomes, as well as trends in mortality and VA-ECLS utilization. Of 528 patients who met inclusion criteria, there were 32 patients with high-complexity anatomy, 196 with moderate-complexity anatomy, and 300 with low-complexity anatomy. The median age was 59.6 years (interquartile range, 45.8-68.2). The number of VA-ECLS implants increased from five implants in 2010 to 81 implants in 2021. Overall mortality was 58.3% and decreased year-by-year (β= -2.03 [95% confidence interval, -3.36 to -0.70], p = 0.007). Six patients (1.1%) were bridged to heart transplantation and 21 (4.0%) to durable ventricular assist device. Complications included cardiac arrhythmia/tamponade (21.6%), surgical site bleeding (17.6%), cannula site bleeding (11.4%), limb ischemia (7.4%), and stroke (8.7%). Utilization of VA-ECLS for CS in ACHD patients has increased over time with a trend toward improvement in survival to discharge.

Assessment of cardiac load-responsiveness in veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: A case series.

Well-timed explant of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS) depends on adequate assessment of cardiac recovery. Often, evaluation of cardiac recovery consists of reducing support flow while visualizing cardiac response using transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). This method, however, is time consuming and based on subjective findings. The dynamic filling index (DFI) may aid in the quantitative assessment of cardiac load-responsiveness. The dynamic filling index is based on the relationship of support flow and pump speed, which varies with varying hemodynamic conditions. This case series intends to investigate whether the DFI may support TEE in facilitating the assessment of cardiac load-responsiveness. Measurements for DFI-determination were performed in seven patients while simultaneously assessing ventricular function by measuring the aortic velocity time integral (VTI) using TEE. Measurements consisted of multiple consecutive transient speed manipulations (∼100r/min) during weaning trials, both at full support and during cardiac reloading at reduced support. The VTI increased between full and reduced support in six weaning trials. In five of these trials DFI decreased or remained equal, and in one case DFI increased. Of the three trials in which VTI decreased between full and reduced support, DFI increased in two cases and decreased in one case. Changes in DFI, however, are mostly smaller than the detection threshold of 0.4mL/rotation. Even though current level of accuracy of the parameter requires further investigation to increase reliability and possibly predictability, DFI seems likely to be a potential parameter in supporting TEE for the assessment of cardiac load-responsiveness.

Upgrading extra corporeal life support to ECMELLA using Impella 5.0 in rescued INTERMACS 1 patients, lactate level matters!

Venoarterial extra corporeal life support (ECLS) is the treatment of choice of Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) class 1 patients, but left ventricle (LV) overload is a complication of ECLS. Unloading the LV by adding Impella 5.0 to ECLS in Impella used in combination with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMELLA) configuration is recommended only in patients with acceptable prognosis. We investigated whether serum lactate level, a simple biological parameter, could be used as a marker to select candidates for bridging from ECLS to ECMELLA. Forty-one consecutive INTERMACS 1 patients under ECLS were upgraded to ECMELLA using Impella 5.0 pump implantation to unload the LV and were followed-up for 30 days. Demographic, clinical, imaging, and biological parameters were collected. The time between ECLS and Impella 5.0 pump implantation was 9 [0-30] hours. Among these 41 patients, 25 died 6±6 days after implantation. They were older (53±12 vs. 43±12 years, P=0.01) with acute coronary syndrome as the primary etiology (64% vs. 13%, P=0.0007). In univariate analysis, patients who died exhibited a lower mean arterial pressure (74±17 vs. 89±9 mmHg, P=0.01), a higher level of troponin (24,000±38,000 vs. 3,500±5,000 mg/dL, P=0.048), a higher level of serum lactate (8.3±7.4 vs. 4.2±3.8 mmol/L, P=0.05) and more frequent cardiac arrest at admission (80% vs. 25%, P=0.03). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, a serum lactate level of >7.9 mmol/L (P=0.008) was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. In INTERMACS 1 patients who require urgent ECLS for restoring hemodynamics and organ perfusion, an upgrade from ECLS to ECMELLA is relevant if the serum lactate level is ≤7.9 mmol/L.

Vascular complications after peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal life support cannulation in cardiogenic shock

BackgroundExtra Corporeal Life Support (ECLS) is an evolving therapy in therapy-resistant cardiogenic shock (CS). Vascular cannulation in emergency situations can be accomplished through puncture of the femoral vessels by specialised teams. Since lower limb ischemia constitutes one of the major complications following cannulation, a distal perfusion cannula (DPC) has emerged as standard of care. We here aimed to analyse the impact of the DPC on limb perfusion and 6-month survival rate. MethodsIn a retrospective study from January 2012 to December 2018, 98 patients with cardiogenic shock and peripheral (v-a) ECLS implantation with documented limb perfusion status were identified and analysed. Demographic data, laboratory parameters, cause of CS, comorbidities, limb perfusion complications and complication management were analysed. Results53 patients (54%) received ECLS therapy in referral centers by our mobile ECLS team, while in 45 patients (46%) the cannulation occured in our center. 71 patients (72%) received a DPC (group A) at the time of ECLS implantation, whereas 27 (28%) (group B) did not or received later (14 patients owing to limb ischemia). 44 patients (45%) developed limb ischemia as a complication of ECLS therapy (31% in group A and 81% in group B- p < 0.001). The 6-month survival rate was 28% in our study cohort (30% in group A and 22% in group B- p = 0.469). ConclusionLower limb ischemia remains a serious complication after peripheral ECLS cannulation in CS, especially when a DPC is absent. Standardised DPC implementation may reduce the rate of severe limb complications in peripheral ECLS.

Modifiable Mechanical Ventilation Targets Are Associated With Improved Survival in Ventilated VA-ECLS Patients

BackgroundIn acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung protective ventilation (LPV) improves patient outcomes by minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. The value of LPV in ventilated patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is not known, but the extracorporeal circuit provides a unique opportunity to modify ventilatory parameters to improve outcomes. ObjectivesThe authors hypothesized that CS patients on VA-ECLS who require mechanical ventilation (MV) may benefit from low intrapulmonary pressure ventilation (LPPV), which has the same end goals as LPV. MethodsThe authors queried the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) registry for hospital admissions between 2009 and 2019 for CS patients on VA-ECLS and MV. They defined LPPV as peak inspiratory pressure at 24 hours on ECLS of <30 cm H2O. Positive end-expiration pressure and dynamic driving pressure (DDP) at 24 hours were also studied as continuous variables. Their primary outcome was survival to discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed that adjusted for baseline Survival After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation score, chronic lung conditions, and center extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume. ResultsA total of 2,226 CS patients on VA-ECLS were included: 1,904 received LPPV. The primary outcome was higher in the LPPV group vs the no-LPPV group (47.4% vs 32.6%; P < 0.001). Median peak inspiratory pressure (22 vs 24 cm H2O; P < 0.001) as well as DDP (14.5 vs 16 cm H2O; P < 0.001) were also significantly lower in those surviving to discharge. The adjusted OR for the primary outcome with LPPV was 1.69 (95% CI: 1.21-2.37; P = 0.0021). ConclusionsLPPV is associated with improved outcomes in CS patients on VA-ECLS requiring MV.

Extracorporeal Life Support in Critical Care Medicine

Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS) may be indicated in patients with refractory heart failure. The list of conditions in which ECLS is successfully used is growing and includes cardiogenic shock following myocardial infarction, refractory cardiac arrest, septic shock with low cardiac output and severe intoxication. Femoral ECLS is the most common and often preferred ECLS-configuration in the emergency setting. Although femoral access is usually quick and easy to establish, it is also associated with specific adverse haemodynamic effects due to the direction of blood flow and access-site complications are inherent. Femoral ECLS provides adequate oxygen delivery and compensates for impaired cardiac output. However, retrograde blood flow into the aorta increases left ventricular afterload and may worsen left ventricular stroke work. Therefore, femoral ECLS is not equivalent to left ventricular unloading. Daily haemodynamic assessments are crucial and should include echocardiography and laboratory tests determining tissue oxygenation. Common complications include the harlequin-phenomenon, lower limb ischaemia or cerebral events and cannula site or intracranial bleeding. Despite a high incidence of complications and high mortality, ECLS is associated with survival benefits and better neurological outcomes in selected patient groups.

Continuous near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy monitoring to guide distal perfusion can minimize limb ischemia surgery for patients requiring femoral venoarterial extracorporeal life support

Background: Patients requiring femoral venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal life support (ECLS) are at risk of distal lower limb hypoperfusion and ischemia of the cannulated leg. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of using continuous noninvasive lower limb oximetry with near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to detect tissue hypoxia and guide distal perfusion catheter (DPC) placement on the rates of leg ischemia requiring surgical intervention.

Novel cannulation strategy with a bidirectional cannula for distal limb perfusion during peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal life support: A preliminary, single-centre study.

Limb ischemia is a severe complication of peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (V-A ECLS). Several techniques have been developed to prevent this, but it remains a major and frequent adverse event (incidence: 10-30%). In 2019, a new cannula with bidirectional flow (retrograde towards the heart and antegrade towards the distal limb) has been introduced. A single-centre experience with this cannula in patients undergoing peripheral V-A ECLS is herewith reported. This prospective observational study included adults (≥18years) undergoing V-A ECLS from January 2021 to October 2022 with the use of a bidirectional femoral artery cannula. Primary outcome was limb ischemia requiring intervention during cardio-circulatory support. Secondary outcomes were compartment syndrome, limb amputation, cannulation site bleeding, need for other surgical intervention due to cannula related complications, duplex ultrasound parameters from the femoral vessels, and in-hospital survival. Twenty-two consecutive patients were included. During extracorporeal life support (ECLS) support, limb ischemia requiring intervention occurred in one patient (4.5%) and no patients developed a compartment syndrome, or required a fasciotomy or amputation. Significant bleeding was reported in two patients (9%) due to slight cannula dislodgement, easily solved with cannula repositioning. In-hospital survival was 63.6%. The bidirectional cannula is associated with a low risk for limb ischemia-related complications compared to current literature, and apparently represents a safe alternative to dedicated distal perfusion cannula. Further studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.