Venoarterial Patients Research Articles

Autopsy Histopathologic Lung Findings in Patients Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in the treatment of respiratory and cardiac failure, but data describing lung histopathology in ECMO recipients are limited. To examine pulmonary histopathologic findings in patients who underwent venovenous (VV) ECMO for pulmonary reasons or venoarterial (VA) ECMO for cardiac indications shortly before death, and to determine if the pulmonary changes provided insights into therapy that may prevent complications and improve outcome. We conducted a retrospective study of lung autopsies, from VV and VA ECMO recipients and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and non-ECMO treatment, between 2008 and 2020 in Silesia Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Poland. Among 83 ECMO patients (42-64 years; men, 57 [68.7%]), the most common histopathologic findings were bronchopneumonia (44 [53.0%]), interstitial edema (40 [48.2%]), diffuse alveolar damage (DAD; 32 [38.6%]), hemorrhagic infarct (28 [33.7%]), and pulmonary hemorrhage (25 [30.1%]). DAD was associated with longer ECMO treatment and longer hospital stay. The use of VV ECMO was a predictor of DAD in patients with ARDS and undergoing ECMO, but it also occurred in 21 of 65 patients (32.3%) in the VA ECMO group, even though VA ECMO was used for heart failure. Although DAD was significantly more common in lung autopsies of VV ECMO patients, one-third of VA ECMO patients had histopathologic changes characteristic of ARDS. The presence of DAD in lung autopsies of patients treated with VA ECMO indicates that in these patients, protective lung ventilation should be considered.

Vascular complications based on mode of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BackgroundVascular complications remain a prevalent and devastating complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Risks for vascular complications have risen as the volume and medical complexity of ECMO cases has rapidly increased in recent years. This study assesses occurrence and clinical impact of vascular complications across all ECMO modes and cannulation methods in a high-volume academic center. MethodsA retrospective single-institution review was performed of all ECMO cannulations for central or peripheral venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO in 2019-2020. Patients who expired during cannulation were excluded. Primary outcomes of vascular consultation rates at or after ECMO placement, limb loss, and mortality were assessed during index hospitalization. ResultsA total of 229 patients were identified during the 2-year study period. VA ECMO was used in the majority of patients (n = 137, 60%), with 83% (N = 114) undergoing peripheral cannulation. Vascular surgery was consulted in 54 (23.6%) patients. Complication rates ranged from 33.9% in peripheral VA cannulation to 7% in jugular VV cannulation. Overall, 65% of vascular consults required operative intervention; interventions were highest in peripheral VA ECMO (n = 30 of 114, 26.3%). Across all ECMO types, acute limb ischemia (ALI) was the most common complication (n = 38, 16.5%), with rates ranging from 26.1% in central VA ECMO to 4.8% in jugular VV ECMO. Distal antegrade perfusion catheters (DPCs) were employed in n = 68 of 114 (59.6%) of all peripheral VA ECMO cases. Prophylactic DPCs were found to be incorrectly placed in 10.2% (n = 7 of 68) of cases, which obscured the ability to fully evaluate the effect of prophylactic DPCs on reducing rates of ALI. Major amputation (Below Knee Amputation/Above Knee Amputation) occurred in six peripheral VA patients (5.3%), two central VA patients (8.65), and two femoral-femoral VV patients (4%). Patients with ALI experienced significantly lower rates of in-hospital survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (32.5% vs 54%, log-rank = 0.023). ConclusionsThis study highlights the prevalence of vascular complications, and their associated mortality impact, across all modes of ECMO and additionally identifies several areas for institutional performance improvement. ALI was the most common complication across all cohorts and was associated with decreased in-hospital survival. The impact of DPC on ALI was difficult to elucidate due to nonstandardized placement patterns and selective use. In the care of these medically complex patients on multidisciplinary teams, review of outcomes and group discussions targeting areas for improvement are critical to success; in this study, findings resulted in the development of a lower extremity perfusion management protocol.

Venoarterial Versus Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation As Bridge to Lung Transplantation

BackgroundVenovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a bridge to lung transplantation with acceptable outcomes. We hypothesized that venoarterial (VA) ECMO, as part of a multidisciplinary ECMO program, yields similar outcomes as VV ECMO as a bridge in lung transplantation. MethodsRecords of all patients who had undergone ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation at University of California, Los Angeles, from January 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020, were reviewed. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, long-term survival, and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome were assessed. ResultsDuring this interval, 58 patients were placed on ECMO with the intention to bridge to lung transplantation: 27 on VV ECMO, and 31 on VA ECMO, with a median duration of 7 and 17 days of support, respectively (P = .01). Successful bridge to lung transplantation occurred in 21 VV patients (78%) and in 26 VA patients (84%). Incidence of primary graft dysfunction III at 72 hours in the VV and the VA cohorts was 0% and 4%, respectively (P = .99). In-hospital and 90-day survival of the VV and VA groups was 100% and 96%, respectively (P = .99). Survival of the 2 groups at 3 years was not significantly different from a contemporary cohort of lung transplant recipients not bridged with ECMO. ConclusionsVA and VV ECMO can both be used as a bridge to lung transplantation with high success, with short and medium-term survival similar to non-bridged lung transplant recipients. Both modes should be considered effective at bridging select candidates to lung transplantation.

Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Expert Consensus Statement From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part II, Intraoperative Management and Troubleshooting.

In the second part of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) working group expert consensus statement, venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO management and troubleshooting in the operating room are discussed. Expert consensus statements are provided about intraoperative monitoring, anesthetic drug dosing, and management of intraoperative problems in VA and VV ECMO patients.

Hemostasis, coagulation and thrombin in venoarterial and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the HECTIC study

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has a high incidence of both bleeding and thrombotic complications. Despite clear differences in patient characteristics and pathologies between veno-venous (VV) and veno-arterial (VA) ECMO support, anticoagulation practices are often the same across modalities. Moreover, there is very little data on their respective coagulation profiles and comparisons of thrombin generation in these patients. This study compares the coagulation profile and thrombin generation between patients supported with either VV and VA ECMO. A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing VA and VV ECMO at an Intensive care department of a university hospital and ECMO referral centre. In addition to routine coagulation testing and heparin monitoring per unit protocol, thromboelastography (TEG), multiplate aggregometry (MEA), calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) and von-Willebrand’s activity (antigen and activity ratio) were sampled second-daily for 1 week, then weekly thereafter. VA patients had significantly lower platelets counts, fibrinogen, anti-thrombin and clot strength with higher d-dimer levels than VV patients, consistent with a more pronounced consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombin generation was higher in VA than VV patients, and the heparin dose required to suppress thrombin generation was lower in VA patients. There were no significant differences in total bleeding or thrombotic event rates between VV and VA patients when adjusted for days on extracorporeal support. VA patients received a lower median daily heparin dose 8500 IU [IQR 2500–24000] versus VV 28,800 IU [IQR 17,300–40,800.00]; < 0.001. Twenty-eight patients (72%) survived to hospital discharge; comprising 53% of VA patients and 77% of VV patients. Significant differences between the coagulation profiles of VA and VV patients exist, and anticoagulation strategies for patients of these modalities should be different. Further research into the development of tailored anticoagulation strategies that include the mode of ECMO support need to be completed.

Abstract 112: Short- and Long-term Survival of Patients Supported on Venoarterial and Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Introduction: Use of both venoarterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has broadened to an expanded set of indications for supporting patients in shock, but outcome data by these indications remains limited. This study examines survival of VA and VV ECMO patients by indication. Methods: A retrospective review of adults supported by ECMO at a single center for cardiogenic shock between January 2010 - November 2018 was conducted. VA ECMO patients (n=449) and VV ECMO patients (n=91) were classified according to indication for ECMO support. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to construct survival curves at 30 days and 1 year and compared using log-rank test. Post-hoc Tukey test was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results: The subgroups of indication for VA-ECMO support were Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE, n=14), Ischemic Cardiomyopathy or Myocardial Infarction (ICM or MI, n=108), Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (NICM, n=82), Post-Cardiotomy (n=129), Transplant (Tx, n=32), and Other (n=84). Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival stratified by indication at 30 days and 1 year were significant (30d: p=0.006, 1y: p=0.009, Figure 1). Multiple comparisons at 30 days and 1 year were significant for Acute PE v Post-Cardiotomy (30d: p=0.044, 1y: p=0.029), NICM v Post-Cardiotomy (30d: p=0.016, 1y: p=0.025), and Tx v Post-Cardiotomy (30d: p=0.01, 1y: p=0.022). Among VV-ECMO patients, the subgroups of indication were ARDS: Influenza (n=25), ARDS: Other Infection (n=24), and ARDS: Non-Infectious (n=42). No statistically significant difference in survival was appreciated between these indications either at 30 days (p=0.742) or 1 year (p=7.82). Conclusions: Patients who require Post-Cardiotomy VA-ECMO support have worse short- and long-term survival compared to patients who require support for Acute PE, NICM, or Transplant indications. Among VV-ECMO patients, however, no survival difference is appreciated by indication.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Biventricular Function in 249 Patients During the Peri-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Period

At a quaternary care center that regularly performs and cares for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a database of all adult patients since 2009 was assembled with echocardiographic parameters of left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular function. From the database, 175 venoarterial (VA) and 74 venovenous (VV) ECMO patients were analyzed to compare the decannulation echocardiographic assessments of biventricular function before, during, and after ECMO in survivors and nonsurvivors. Retrospective chart review-based study. A single quaternary care center. All adult patients who received ECMO from 2009 to 2017 with both survival data and echographic studies were included in this retrospective study. When indicated, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms were performed for ECMO patients. The results of these echocardiograms were reviewed retrospectively, and differences between survivors and nonsurvivors were examined. A retrospective chart review of before, during cannulation, and after decannulation echocardiographic assessments of biventricular function was performed. On average, VA ECMO survivors had better post-decannulation LV function than did nonsurvivors by a full clinical grade-mild impairment versus moderate impairment (p < 0.001). RV function comparison was similar-mild impairment in survivors versus moderate impairment in nonsurvivors (p = 0.007). LV and RV function before and during ECMO in survivors was not different from that of nonsurvivors. The change in biventricular function from before to after cannulation and during cannulation to post-cannulation was approximately a full clinical grade better in survivors than nonsurvivors (p < 0.01 in all cases). In VV ECMO patients, post-decannulation RV function was significantly worse in nonsurvivors (moderate dysfunction vs borderline normal function) (p = 0.013). Retrospective chart review of 249 patients suggests that echocardiographic assessment of biventricular function before ECMO cannulation is not prognostic in VA or VV ECMO patients. Post-decannulation assessment of biventricular function may aid in triaging more "at risk" patients because nonsurvivors have significantly worse biventricular function after decannulation. The failure to improve biventricular function from the before to after ECMO phases and the during to after ECMO phases is concerning for a poor prognosis.

Use of venovenous ECMO for neonatal and pediatric ECMO: a decade of experience at a tertiary children's hospital.

Advances in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have led to increased use of venovenous (VV) ECMO in the pediatric population. We present the evolution and experience of pediatric VV ECMO at a tertiary care institution. A retrospective cohort study from 01/2005 to 07/2016 was performed, comparing by cannulation mode. Survival to discharge, complications, and decannulation analyses were performed. In total, 160 patients (105 NICU, 55 PICU) required 13 ± 11days of ECMO. VV cannulation was used primarily in 83 patients with 64% survival, while venoarterial (VA) ECMO was used in 77 patients with 54% survival. Overall, 74% of patients (n = 118) were successfully decannulated; 57% survived to discharge. VA ECMO had a higher rate of intra-cranial hemorrhage than VV (22 vs 9%, p = 0.003). Sixteen VA patients (21%) had radiographic evidence of a cerebral ischemic insult. No cardiac complications occurred with the use of dual-lumen VV cannulas. There were no differences in complications (p = 0.40) or re-operations (p = 0.85) between the VV and VA groups. Dual-lumen VV ECMO can be safely performed with appropriate image guidance, is associated with a lower rate of intra-cranial hemorrhage, and may be the preferred first-line mode of ECMO support in appropriately selected NICU and PICU patients. II.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation trends for pediatric respiratory failure and central nervous system injury

Background Guidelines regarding arterial cannula site and cannula site-specific risks of central nervous system (CNS) injury for pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support are lacking. We reviewed cannulation trends for pediatric respiratory failure and evaluated CNS complication rates by cannulation site and mode of support. Methods The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry was queried for all pediatric respiratory failure patients <18 years treated from 1993-2007. The primary outcome was radiographic evidence of CNS injury. Results Venoarterial (VA) support was used in 62% of 2617 ECMO runs. The carotid artery was used in 93% of VA patients. Femoral artery use increased in patients >5 years of age and >20 kg. Venovenous (VV) ECMO was used in >50% of children >10 years. No significant difference was identified in CNS injury between carotid and femoral cannulation in any age group but the femoral group was small (4.4%). VA support was independently associated with increased odds of CNS injury compared to VV cannulation (OR, 1.6). Conclusion VA ECMO is the most common mode of support in pediatric respiratory failure patients. Although no significant difference in CNS injury was noted between carotid and femoral artery cannulation, the odds of injury were significantly higher than VV support.

Venoarterial versus venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: The extracorporeal life support organization registry, 1990-1999

Background/Purpose: Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) traditionally has been the mode of support used in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). A few studies report success using venovenous (VV) ECMO. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes in CDH patients treated with VA and VV. Methods: The authors queried the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry for newborns with CDH treated with ECMO from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1999. They analyzed the pre-ECMO data, ECMO course, and complications. Results: VA was utilized in 2,257 (86%) and VV in 371 (14%) patients. The pre-ECMO status was similar, with greater use of nitric oxide, surfactant, and pressors in VV. Survival rate was similar (58.4% for VV and 52.2% for VA, P =.057). VA was associated with more seizures (12.3% v 6.7%, P =.0024) and cerebral infarction (10.5% v 6.7%, P =.03). Sixty-four treatments were converted from VV to VA (VV→VA). Survival rate in VV→VA was not significantly different than VA (43.8% v 52.2%, respectively; P =.23). VV→VA and VA patients had similar neurologic complications. Conclusions: CDH patients treated with VV and VA have similar survival rates. VA had more neurologic complications. The authors identified no disadvantage to the use of VV as an initial mode of ECMO for CDH, although some infants may need conversion to VA. J Pediatr Surg 36:1199-1204. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates with respiratory failure

Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been successful in support of neonates with respiratory failure but requires right common carotid artery ligation. While no short-term neurologic complications have resulted from neonatal carotid ligation, late complications may occur. For both VA ECMO and venovenous (VV) ECMO, blood is drained from the right atrium via a right internal jugular cannula, oxygenated by a membrane lung, and returned to the patient. VV ECMO spares the carotid by perfusing the oxygenated blood into a vein. VV ECMO gave total respiratory support to three neonates with respiratory failure and each infant survived. In comparison with three similar VA ECMO patients, the VV patients required higher ECMO circuit flow rates and had lower systemic arterial Po2s. Length of time on ECMO, length of hospital stay, and neurologic outcome were similar in the VV and VA patients. Differences among the patients were related to their primary disease rather than to the mode of ECMO support. The VV patients had cannulation of the femoral vein for perfusion of oxygenated blood. Late complications may occur from femoral vein ligation as well as from carotid ligation so long-term follow-up is needed to assess these two ECMO techniques.