Variceal Rebleeding Research Articles

Evidence for preventing EVRB in cirrhotic patients: A systematic review.

Systematic strategies for preventing and treating esophagogastric variceal rebleeding (EVRB) are currently inadequate. This systematic review aimed to update this critical gap by searching contemporary studies from major guideline websites, databases, and professional associations focused on EVRB prevention in cirrhosis patients. Key findings highlight evaluation methods, risk management, preventive measures, health education, and follow-up strategies. Notably, a hepatic venous pressure gradient exceeding 18 mmHg is identified as a reliable predictor of gastroesophageal varices (GOV) rebleeding. Effective management of primary diseases is crucial, with methods including antiviral and anti-fibrotic therapies, alcohol avoidance, vaccination, and careful medication management. The combination of nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is established as the gold standard for secondary EVRB prevention. For patients experiencing recurrent bleeding despite NSBBs and EVL, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) therapy is recommended. Surgical options, such as surgical shunt and devascularization, are advised for those unsuitable for endoscopic therapy or TIPS, particularly in Child-Pugh A and B patients unresponsive to treatment. Additionally, traditional Chinese medicine options, such as Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets, Fuzheng Huayu Capsules, and Anluo Huaxian Pills, have shown promise in improving hepatic fibrosis and GOV in cirrhotic patients. This review offers a comprehensive overview of current prevention and treatment strategies for EVRB, providing valuable insights for clinicians and healthcare professionals.

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Cyanoacrylate Injection and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the Prevention of Gastric Varices Rebleeding.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) and transjugular intrahepatic portal shunts (TIPSs) in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis with ruptured gastric varices. In this retrospective study, 105 patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric varicose veins who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between April 2018 and April 2023 without nonselective β-blockers treatment and no portal vein thrombosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into the transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt (TIPS) group (n = 60) and the EUS-CYA group (n = 45) for the purpose of evaluating postoperative rebleeding rates, complications, survival rates, and other factors. During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rebleeding rates between the TIPS group and EUS-CYA group within 3 months (5% vs 2.2%; P = 0.825; 10% vs 20%, P = 0.147). However, the TIPS group had significantly lower rebleeding rates than the EUS-CYA group at 6 months (10% vs 33.3%; P = 0.030) and 1 year or longer (11.7% vs 42.2%; P < 0.01). In terms of hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence rate of the TIPS group was significantly higher than that of the EUS-CYA group (20% vs 2.2%; P = 0.006). In addition, there was no difference in the survival rates between the two groups (93.3% vs 97.8%; P = 0.552). TIPS is superior to EUS in preventing rebleeding in patients with ruptured varices of the fundus, but it has a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, and there is no difference in long-term survival between the two groups.

Endoscopic clipping combined with cyanoacrylate injection vs. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of isolated gastric variceal bleeding: Randomized controlled trial.

Although the incidence of isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1) bleeding is low, the condition is highly dangerous and associated with high mortality, making its treatment challenging. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic clipping combined with cyanoacrylate injection (EC-CYA) vs. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in treating IGV1. In a single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with IGV1 bleeding were randomly assigned to the EC-CYA group or TIPS group. The primary end-points were gastric variceal rebleeding rates and technical success. Secondary end-points included cumulative nonbleeding rates, mortality, and complications. A total of 156 patients between January 2019 and April 2023 were selected and randomly assigned to the EC-CYA group (n = 76) and TIPS group (n = 80). The technical success rate was 100% for both groups. The rebleeding rates were 14.5% in the EC-CYA group and 8.8% in the TIPS group, showing no significant difference (P = 0.263). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the cumulative nonbleeding rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months for the two groups lacked statistical significance (P = 0.344). Similarly, cumulative survival rates at 12, 24, and 36 months for the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.916). The bleeding rates from other causes were 13.2% and 6.3% for the respective groups, showing no significant difference (P = 0.144). No instances of ectopic embolism were observed in either group. The incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in the TIPS group was statistically higher than that in the EC-CYA group (P = 0.001). Both groups are effective in controlling IGV1 bleeding. Notably, EC-CYA did not result in ectopic embolism, and the incidence of HE was lower than that observed with TIPS.

Coil- and Plug-Assisted Transvenous Retrograde Obliteration (CARTO/PARTO) in the Treatment of Gastric Varices: A European Single Centre Experience

In Europe, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is considered the primary treatment for gastric varix (GV) bleeding to reduce portal hypertension. However, in Asian countries, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) and its variants plug/coil assisted transvenous retrograde obliteration (PARTO/CARTO) are the preferred approaches. The purpose of this study is to report a European single-center experience in the use of PARTO/CARTO techniques for the treatment of GVs in patients with portal hypertension, focusing on the effectiveness and safety of the procedure. All the procedures involving the PARTO/CARTO techniques performed from 2019 to 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Technical success was defined as the complete obliteration of both the GVs and the gastro-renal (GR) shunt on review of the Computed Tomography (CT) scan performed 3 days after the procedure. The obliteration rate was also evaluated through performing CT scans 1 and 12 months after the procedure, and through endoscopic follow-up at 3 and 6 months. Additionally, major and minor complications were reported. The study involved seven patients, with a technical success of 100%. During follow-up, there were no episodes of variceal rebleeding or upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Two patients developed ascites, which resolved with medical therapy. One patient exhibited focal portal thrombosis, which was successfully treated with heparin. PARTO/CARTO techniques demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates, offering advantages over traditional BRTO. The use of coils and plugs simplifies the procedure, eliminates sclerosing agents, and prevents complications associated with balloon guiding catheters.

Impact of rifaximin on cirrhosis complications and gastric microbiota in patients with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

The application of rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic, in hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has been well established; however, its effect on other complications in cirrhotic patients with previous gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a pilot randomized controlled trial aiming to evaluate the impact of rifaximin on cirrhosis-related complications and changes in gastric microbiota. Eighty cirrhotic patients who received prophylactic endoscopic treatment for variceal rebleeding were randomly assigned to the control or rifaximin treatment group (rifaximin 400 mg twice daily for 8 weeks). Primary outcome was the total liver-related score, consisting of changes in cirrhosis-related complications including rebleeding, ascites, HE and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The 16S rDNA sequencing analysis was conducted with gastric lavage fluid samples for the analysis of gastric microbiota. During the 8-week follow-up, the total liver-related score decreased significantly upon rifaximin therapy (-0.35 ± 0.14 vs 0.05 ± 0.14, p = 0.0465) as well as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.019) and interleukin-8 (p = 0.025) compared with the control group. The rate of PVT recanalization was significantly higher in the rifaximin group (p = 0.012). Prominent difference in gastric microbiota between the two groups was observed, and the rifaximin group had a higher abundance of several taxa which were dysregulated in the progression of cirrhosis. CRP was correlated with several taxa including Alphaproteobacteria, Rhizobiales and Collinsella. Rifaximin may improve cirrhosis-related complications, including PVT, in patients with previous GEVB through anti-inflammatory and microbiota-modulating functions. NCT02991612.

Early Experience with Surgical Management of Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension in Nigeria: Report from a Single Centre

Abstract Introduction: Portal hypertension is characterised by an increase in portal pressure. It may be a result of cirrhosis of the liver or non-cirrhotic hepatic and portal vein diseases. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is caused by a heterogeneous group of diseases affecting the liver and extrahepatic locations. In our setting, the most common cause of NCPH is schistosomiasis. We describe our experience in the surgical management of NCPH. Materials and Methods: This is a single centre retrospective study of all patients who had surgery for NCPH from January 2015 to December 2023 was retrieved for data collection. Data collected included the cause of portal hypertension, age, gender, indication for surgery, type of surgery, and outcome of surgery. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. Results: A total of 13 patients had surgery for NCPH. The most common cause of NCPH was hepatosplenic schistosomiasis in 10 patients, whereas the remaining 3 patients had idiopathic NCPH. The indication for surgery was upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to oesophageal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy. The surgical intervention of choice includes the modified Sugiura procedure in five patients and the Hassab procedure in eight patients. Variceal rebleeding was seen in two patients within 1 year of surgery (15%) and in only three patients within 3 years of surgery (23%). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of NCPH is associated with good outcomes in patients with failed endoscopic therapy.

Application of a virtual ruler in predicting postoperative rebleeding from esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

BackgroundEsophageal variceal diameter (EVD) is one of the most important predictors of variceal bleeding, as well as an important predictor of the effectiveness of endoscopic esophageal varices (EV) treatments. EVD is currently determined using visual inspection by endoscopic operators, meaning that results can vary widely between operators. This approach also means that cases unsuitable for endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) can be complicated by postoperative hemorrhage. Thus, the purpose of this study was to explore the value of a virtual ruler (VR) in predicting rebleeding after the endoscopic treatment of EV in patients with cirrhosis. MethodsWe enrolled 588 patients with cirrhosis and EV (with and without gastric varices), who were treated with EVL or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy across 3 hospitals. We categorized participants into 2 groups, a nonbleeding group and a rebleeding group, according to whether they bled again after surgery. We compared basic demographic and clinical data, laboratory tests, EVD, and treatment modalities between the 2 groups. Potential risk factors for rebleeding after EV operations were analyzed using univariate and multivariable regression analyses. Correlations between esophageal variceal rebleeding and EVD were also analyzed, as was the consistency between visual EVD estimates and EVD measured using a VR. ResultsChild-Pugh class, albumin (ALB) levels, prothrombin time (PT), EVD (visual value), EVD (VR value), red sign, and the number of laps used for EVL showed statistically significant differences between the rebleeding and nonbleeding groups. Univariate regression analysis showed that Child-Pugh classification, ALB levels, PT, EVD (VR value), and red sign were strongly associated with rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of EV, whereas multivariable regression analysis showed that Child-Pugh classification, ALB levels, and EVD (VR value) were predictive factors for rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of EV. Differences between visual EVD estimates and VR EVD measurements were large. (Kappa value: 0.391, P < .001). However, the 2 methods showed high agreement for EVD >1 cm (87/95) ConclusionEVD (VR value) can more accurately predict rebleeding rates. It can also provide a basis for selecting appropriate endoscopic treatment modalities for EV and effectively circumvent postoperative EV rebleeding.

Impact of sarcopenia on variceal rebleeding in patients after endoscopic therapy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching

Background Sarcopenia is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and can be used for predicting dismal prognostic outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the role of sarcopenia in rebleeding and mortality of liver cirrhosis patients after endoscopic therapy. Methods The liver cirrhosis patients who received endoscopic treatment were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to overcome selection bias. Two-year rebleeding episodes and mortality after endoscopic therapy were recorded. Results A total of 109 (32.4%) sarcopenia patients were reported. Before PSM, the frequency of rebleeding was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group relative to the non-sarcopenia group (41.3% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001). Moreover, the multivariable analysis revealed that sarcopenia (p < 0.001, HR:2.596, 95% CI 1.591–4.237) was independently associated with a 2-year rebleeding episode. After PSM, the sarcopenia group exhibited an increased rebleeding rate as compared with non-sarcopenia group (44.4% vs. 15.3%, p < 0.001). According to multivariable analysis, sarcopenia (p < 0.001, HR:3.490, 95% CI 1.756–6.938) was identified as a significant predictor for 2-year rebleeding. Conclusion Sarcopenia was significantly associated with a high 2-year rebleeding rate in liver cirrhosis patients after endoscopic treatment. Therefore, the precise evaluation of a patient’s nutritional status, including sarcopenia becomes mandatory before endoscopic treatment.

Comparison of 2 Days versus 5 Days of Octreotide after Endoscopic Therapy in Preventing Early Esophageal Varices Rebleed: A Randomized Controlled Study

In esophageal varices bleeding, following the initial endoscopic hemostasis, it is recommended to administer vasoactive medications for a period of 2-5 days in order to avoid early rebleeding. Octreotide is the preferred vasoactive medication for treating variceal bleeding due to its favorable safety profile. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a 2-day octreotide infusion against a 5-day octreotide infusion following endoscopic intervention in avoiding early rebleeding of esophageal varices in individuals with cirrhosis. This study was a prospective, parallel, randomised controlled experiment conducted on a cohort of 184 subjects who were recruited from the endoscopy unit of the Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department at Tanta University Hospital in Egypt. The five days rate of rebleeding was 16.85% in the 2-days group against 15.91% in the 5- days group without significant difference (P= 0.865). In cirrhotic individuals with bleeding esophageal varices, a 2-day regimen of octreotide is equally efficacious as a 5-day regimen in avoiding rebleeding over a 5-day period, following successful control of bleeding with endoscopic intervention.

HCC portal hypertension imaging score derived from CT predicts re-bleeding and mortality after acute variceal bleeding

Background/PurposeRisk factors for re-bleeding and death after acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in cirrhotic HCC patients are not fully understood.We aimed to (1) explore how the combination of high-risk esophageal varices, HCC status, and portal vein tumor thrombus (i.e., HCC Portal Hypertension Imaging Score [HCCPHTIS]) helps predict increased risk of variceal re-bleeding and mortality; (2) assess predictability and reproducibility of the identified variceal re-bleeding rules.MethodsThis prospective study included 195 HCC patients with first-time AVB and liver cirrhosis, and conducted multivariable Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was calculated to find the optimal sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of the variables. The reproducibility of the results obtained was verified in a different but related group of patients.Results56 patients (28.7%) had re-bleeding within 6 weeks; HCCPHTIS was an independent risk factor for variceal re-bleeding after AVB (Odd ratio, 2.330; 95% confidence interval: 1.728–3.142, p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of HCCPHTIS cut off value > 3 was 66.2%, sensitivity 83.9%, and specificity 82.3%. HCCPHTIS area under the curve was higher than Child-Pugh score (89% vs. 75%, p < 0.001). 74(37.9%) death occurred within 6 weeks; HCCPHTIS > 4 was associated with increased risk of death within 6 weeks after AVB (p < 0.001).ConclusionHCCPHTIS > 3 is a strong predictor of variceal re-bleeding within the first 6 weeks. However, patients with HCCPHTIS > 4 were at increased risk of death within 6 weeks.

The association between portal vein thrombosis and rebleeding after non-urgent endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices

Objective: To investigate the association between portal vein thrombosis and rebleeding after non-urgent endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices. Methods: The cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric varices diagnosed in the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2017 to March 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into thrombotic group and non-thrombotic group according to the presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis. The failure rate of endoscopic treatment and rebleeding rate in different periods were compared between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to select the best cutoff value of gastric varicose diameter that affected total rebleeding during follow-up in both groups. The influencing factors of rebleeding within 12 and 36 months in both groups were analyzed, and the influencing factors of rebleeding within 36 months in thrombus group were further analyzed. Results: A total of 106 patients were enrolled, including 53 patients in the thrombotic group [male 37, female 16, aged 18-78 (54±13) years] and 53 patients in the non-thrombotic group [male 37, female 16, aged 27-83 (55±12) years]. The follow-up time of the two groups were (20±15) and (25±15) months, respectively. The total rebleeding rate in the thrombotic group was higher than that in the non-thrombotic group [30.2% (16/53) vs 13.2% (7/53), P˂0.05]. The rebleeding rates within 6, 12, 24 and 36 months in the thrombotic group were higher than those in the non-thrombotic group [18.9% (10/53) vs 5.7% (3/53), 18.9% (10/53) vs 5.7% (3/53), 28.3% (15/53) vs 9.4% (5/53), 30.2% (16/53) vs 11.3% (6/53), all P˂0.05]. The best cut-off value of the diameter of gastric varices that affects the total rebleeding in the two groups was 10.4 mm (10 mm was selected as the best cut-off value for the convenience of practical clinical application). Hemoglobin ˂ 85 g/L (HR=0.202, 95%CI: 0.043-0.953, P=0.043), 10 mm ˂ the diameter of GV ≤ 15 mm (HR=5.321, 95%CI: 1.161-24.390, P=0.031) and endoscopic variceal ligation combined with endoscopic tissue adhesive injection (EVL+ETAI) (HR=7.172, 95%CI: 1.910-26.930, P=0.004) were the risk factors for the first gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding within 12 months after non-urgent endoscopic treatment. EVL+ETAI (HR=3.811, 95%CI: 1.441-10.084, P=0.007) and portal vein thrombosis (HR=4.026, 95%CI: 1.483-10.932, P=0.006) were the risk factors for the first gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding within 36 months after non-urgent endoscopic treatment. The study found that, 10 mm ˂ the diameter of GV ≤ 15 mm (HR=7.503, 95%CI: 1.568-35.890, P=0.012) was the risk factor for rebleeding within 36 months in the thrombotic group. Conclusion: Portal vein thrombosis is a risk factor for rebleeding after non-urgent endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric varices.

Can Endothelin-1 Levels in Patients with Esophageal Variceal Bleeding at Admission Predict Rebleeding Within 5 Days?

Portal hypertension complicating liver cirrhosis is associated with vascular resistance, possibly due to overexpression of humoral vasoconstrictors, including endothelin. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of serum endothelin-1 levels as a noninvasive predictor of early esophageal rebleeding (within 5 days) following endoscopic treatment. Of the patients presented to the endoscopy unit at Mansoura University Hospital, 50 patients were chosen for this study on the basis of endoscopically proven acute esophageal variceal bleeding consequent to hepatitis C viral infection complicated by liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Routine laboratory parameters and serum endothelin-1 levels were assessed prior to endoscopic treatment. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the development of early postendoscopic rebleeding. Group A consisted of 16 patients who developed rebleeding, while group B included 34 patients who did not. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictors of rebleeding. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that endothelin-1 level (P < .001) and serum albumin level (P = .04) were independent risk factors for early rebleeding. The most efficient cutoff value for endothelin-1 levels in predicting variceal rebleeding within the 5 days after endoscopic intervention was 65.29, which had an 88.2% specificity, 87.5% sensitivity, 88% accuracy, and area under the curve value of 0.89. In addition, hemoglobin, albumin, and creatinine levels were significantly different between bleeding and nonrebleeding groups (P = .03, P = .014, and P <.001, respectively), as was the duration of hospital stay (P < .001). Serum endothelin-1 levels appear to be a reliable, practical, noninvasive predictor of early variceal rebleeding and related comorbidities such as the severity of kidney affection and duration of hospital stay.

Preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Preventing rebleeding is crucial, but the best prevention technique for patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remains debatable. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy (ET) plus nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) for preventing variceal rebleeding in this patient population. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception until May 18, 2023. The studies were screened using predetermined criteria, relevant data were extracted, and pooled analyses were performed using the Reviewer Manager 5.4.1 software. We retrieved 1032 studies, of which 5 studies comprising a total of 272 patients were included. The postoperative variceal rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the TIPS group than in the ET+NSBBs group (odds ratio [OR]=0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.11-0.35, P<0.05, I2=0%), but the portal vein recanalization rate was higher (OR=7.92, 95% CI=3.04-20.67, P<0.05, I2=0%). The rates of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and mortality did not differ between the groups. Our results suggest that TIPS prevents variceal rebleeding without increasing the hepatic encephalopathy risk more effectively than ET plus NSBBs, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival. Thus, it may be preferable to ET plus NSBBs for preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis and PVT. However, more large-scale and multicenter randomized controlled trials involving other patient populations are required to verify the clinical efficacy of both these treatments and ensure generalizability.

Coil-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (CARTO) for the Treatment of Gastric Variceal Bleeding in a Patient with a Gastrorenal Shunt: A Case Report

Background &#x0D; Portal hypertension (pHTN) is primarily caused by liver cirrhosis, which can lead to varices at portosystemic anastomoses.1,2 Gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) is rare but can be life-threatening with a mortality up to 50% for each bleeding episode. When endoscopic banding is ineffective and TIPS placement is contra-indicated due to risk of post-TIPS encephalopathy, coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (CARTO), which has shown great success in some studies, can be an effective treatment.5,8,9,10 This case demonstrates successful use of CARTO to treat GVB in a patient with a gastrorenal shunt (GRS) who presented with pHTN. &#x0D; &#x0D; Case Overview &#x0D; A 62-year-old female with cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) presented with pHTN and GVB. The patient had a massive GRS, which permitted access through the systemic venous circulation to treat the bleeding varices. Furthermore, the patient had hepatic encephalopathy (HE), making TIPS placement a poor choice due to risk of HE exacerbation. CARTO was performed to treat the bleeding varices and had the added benefit of decreasing risk of HE. &#x0D; &#x0D; Discussion/Results &#x0D; This case highlights CARTO in a patient with a 22mm GRS using a dual catheter system. Eighteen detachable 035 coils were first deployed in the GRS, followed by complete occlusion with a Gelfoam slurry to obliterate the gastric varices. Studies have described CARTO, all of which have shown incredibly high technical (complete embolization by angiography and/or CT) and clinical (no variceal rebleeding) success rates. This patient returned for follow-up CT and endoscopic imaging, which confirmed technically and clinically successful CARTO. &#x0D; &#x0D; Conclusion and Potential Impact &#x0D; CARTO appears to be a safe alternative to TIPS when treating GVB caused by pHTN, especially in patients who have HE and a GRS. Thus, CARTO should be discussed as a treatment option for these patients. Although portal pressure increases post-CARTO, the improvement of HE can lead to an improved safety profile with future TIPS.

Influence of subcutaneous adipose tissue index on prognosis in cirrhotic patients following endoscopic therapy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe relation of adipose tissue depletion with prognostic outcome of variceal bleeding among cirrhotic patients is still inconclusive. The present work explored whether adipose tissue, which was measured based on computed tomography (CT), was valuable for analyzing rebleeding and mortality among patients with variceal bleeding who had undergone endoscopic therapy.MethodsThe study encompassed cirrhotic patients who underwent endoscopic therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding between January 2016 and October 2022. The L3-level CT images were obtained. Besides, impacts of subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI), as well as total adipose tissue index (TATI) on rebleeding and mortality among cirrhotic patients following endoscopic therapy were examined.ResultsIn this work, our median follow-up period was 31 months. Among those adipose tissue indexes, only SATI exhibited an independent relation to higher rebleeding (HR 0.981, 95% CI, 0.971–0.991, p < 0.001) and mortality (HR 0.965, 95% CI, 0.944–0.986, p = 0.001) risks. Upon multivariate Cox regression, low SATI (male < 30.15 cm2/m2, female < 39.82 cm2/m2) was independently linked to higher rebleeding risk (HR 2.511, 95% CI, 1.604–3.932, p < 0.001) and increased mortality risk (HR 3.422, 95% CI, 1.489–7.864, p = 0.004) after adjusting for other predictors. Furthermore, subgroups were created based on using nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs), demonstrating that quantitatively assessing SATI exerts a vital role in evaluating rebleeding incidence in patients with or without NSBB therapy.ConclusionThis study underscores the potential of quantifying SATI as a means for achieving a more accurate risk classification for individual patients and identifying patients that can gain more benefits from nutritional intervention.

Statins, metformin, and RAS inhibitors did not reduce variceal bleeding risk and mortality in a large, real-life cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

Previous experimental and clinical studies suggested a beneficial effect of statins, metformin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (RASi) on portal hypertension. Still, their effects on hard cirrhosis-related clinical endpoints, such as variceal bleeding and bleeding-related mortality, remain to be investigated. Thus, we recorded the use of statins, metformin and RASi in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for primary (PP, n = 440) and secondary bleeding prophylaxis (SP, n = 480) between 01/2000 and 05/2020. Variceal (re-) bleeding and survival rates were compared between patients with vs. without these co-medications. A total of 920 cirrhotic patients with varices were included. At first EBL, median MELD was 13 and 515 (56%) patients showed ascites. Statins, metformin and RASi were used by 49 (5.3%), 74 (8%), and 91 (9.9%) patients, respectively. MELD and platelet counts were similar in patients with and without the co-medications of interest. Rates of first variceal bleeding and variceal rebleeding at 2 years were 5.2% and 11.7%, respectively. Neither of the co-medications were associated with decreased first bleeding rates (log-rank tests in PP: statins p = 0.813, metformin p = 0.862, RASi p = 0.919) nor rebleeding rates (log-rank tests in SP: statin p = 0.113, metformin p = 0.348, RASi p = 0.273). Similar mortality rates were documented in patients with and without co-medications for PP (log-rank tests: statins p = 0.630, metformin p = 0.591, RASi p = 0.064) and for SP (statins p = 0.720, metformin p = 0.584, RASi p = 0.118). In clinical practice, variceal bleeding and mortality rates of cirrhotic patients were not reduced by co-medication with statins, metformin or RASi. Nevertheless, we recommend the use of these co-medications by indication, as they may still exert beneficial effects on non-bleeding complications in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential diagnostic markers for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

The aim of the present study is to explore the potential prediction value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or peripheral blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB). We have enrolled 80 rebleeding patients with EVB and 113 EVB patients without rebleeding in the present study. The lymphocyte, platelet counts, the PLR, and the NLR of the candidates were calculated, and receiver-operating characteristic curve was drawn to examine whether NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing rebleeding patients from the EVB patients. We observed that NLR and PLR were all significantly increased in rebleeding patients with EVB compared with the non-rebleeding patients (p < 0.01); moreover, the area under the curve of NLR and PLR was 0.7037 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6281-0.7792) and 0.7468 (95% CI, 0.6793-0.8144), respectively, suggesting that NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing non-rebleeding patients from the rebleeding patients. We reported that NLR and PLR were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patient with esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, suggesting that NLR and PLR may be potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers for the rebleeding among patients with EVB.

B-Blockers in Liver Cirrhosis: A Wonder Drug for Every Stage of Portal Hypertension? A Narrative Review.

In cirrhotic patients, non-selective b-blockers (NSBBs) constitute the reference treatment of choice as monotherapy or combined with band ligation for the prevention of first variceal bleeding and rebleeding, respectively. Furthermore, the last Baveno VII guidelines recommended carvedilol, a b-blocker with additional anti-a1 receptor activity, in all compensated cirrhotics with clinically significant portal hypertension, to prevent liver decompensation. Interestingly enough, NSBBs have been reported to have a potentially positive impact on the short-term mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. However, concerns remain about the use of b-blockers in the presence of severe complications, such as refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or established cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. In addition, it has not been verified yet whether carvedilol supersedes all the other NSBBs in every stage of liver disease, even when severe complications have developed. Therefore, this review aims to illustrate recent data regarding the potential role of b-blockers across all stages of liver disease, beyond the primary and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, and address the authors' proposals on the use of NSBBs concerning the severity of liver disease and the patient's performance status.

Effectiveness and prognosis of covered stents with different diameters in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) conducted utilizing stents of different diameters, thus providing recommendations for more logical selections of covered stents for patients with portal hypertension, in particular for the Asian population. Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies from inception until February 2023. The meta-analysis was carried out using Revman 5.4 Software. Heterogeneity between researches was assessed by the χ2 test and I2 index. The outcomes evaluated were the incidence of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE), variceal rebleeding, shunt dysfunction, 1-year overall survival and decrease in portal pressure gradient (PPG). Eight appropriate clinical trials with 1246 patients were selected (638 and 608 patients in the experimental and control groups, respectively). In regards to preoperative PPG reduction, there was no discernible difference between the two groups [mean difference = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.29-2.58, P = 0.12]. The rate of post-TIPS HE was significantly higher in patients in the 8 mm stent group than in the 6-7 mm stent group [odds ratio (OR) = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.42-0.70, P < 0.00001, I2 = 46%]. There were no significant differences in the rates of variceal rebleeding (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.67-1.65, P = 0.84, I2 = 0%), shunt dysfunction (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.53-1.47, P = 0.64, I2 = 0%) and 1-year overall survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.50-1.50, P = 0.61, I2 = 0%). Asian populations with portal hypertension may benefit more from TIPS with 6-7 mm covered stents because they can reduce the risk of postoperative HE while offering similar efficacy when compared to 8 mm covered stents.

Endoscopic Therapy of Gastric Varices: Safety and Efficacy of N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Injection.

Background Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency that results in significant morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden. Both types of cardio-fundal varices, gastro-esophageal varix 2 (GOV2) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1), can cause massive bleeding and often are difficult to treat compared to the other types of gastric varices. Endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL) is a less effective treatment modality for gastric varices than esophageal varices and is associated with high re-bleeding rates. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl) injection is an effective and potential treatment option for fundal varices. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection therapy in cardio-fundal varices. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection therapy for fundal varices. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at the Department of Gastroenterology, Allied Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, over one year. All patients, irrespective of age and gender, presenting with UGIB and in whom fundal varices were diagnosed on gastroscopy followed by n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate injection therapy were included in this study. The efficacy and safety of Histoacryl therapy were assessed by analyzing successful hemostasis, frequency of re-bleeding, obliteration, and regression of fundal varices on repeat endoscopy. Adverse events such as re-bleeding and mortality related to fundal variceal treatment were documented. Results A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Of these, 70% had IGV1, while the remaining 30% had GOV2. Hemostasis was achieved in 100% of patients following n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection. Successful obliteration with regression of varices was observed in 91.3% of patients. Various adverse events were observed, with abdominal pain being the most common observed complication in 18.3% of participants. However, only 8.3% of participants developed re-bleeding due to ulcer formation at the injection site, and no death occurred directly due to fundal variceal treatment. Conclusion N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection therapy is a lifesaving, effective, and safe intervention for controlling bleeding from cardio-fundal varices, leading to improved health status and a consequent decrease in episodes of recurrent bleeding. Its side effects are few and infrequent. However, larger-scale studies are needed to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection therapy. These studies will be crucial in establishing comprehensive guidelines for the management of fundal varices.