Variation In Practice Patterns Research Articles

Trends in patient complexity, practice setting, and surgeon reimbursement for urolithiasis: do rural urologists pay the price?

ObjectivesTo evaluate the relationship between patient complexity, practice setting, and surgeon reimbursement for ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MethodsThe “2021 Medicare Physician and Other Provider” file was used to collect Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes and hierarchical condition category (HCC) scores of urologists. Higher HCC score corresponds to higher medical complexity and higher RUCA code corresponds to a more rural area. Medicare reimbursement for ureteroscopy and PCNL were collected. Linear regressions were performed to predict change in reimbursement based on RUCA and HCC scores. ResultsIn 2021, 52,816 procedures under CPT code 52356 (ureteroscopy) and 1649 procedures under 50080 or 50081 (PCNL) were billed to Medicare. Mean reimbursement was $338.24 for ureteroscopy and $957.89 for PCNL. For ureteroscopy, higher HCC score predicted lower reimbursement (p<0.001). Higher HCC score predicted higher reimbursement for PCNL (p<0.01). Average RUCA for ureteroscopy was higher than for PCNL (p=0.02). Rural location predicted lower reimbursement for ureteroscopy (p<0.001), however there was no association for PCNL. ConclusionsFor ureteroscopy, higher-risk patients are associated with lower reimbursement while the opposite holds true for PCNL. Rural practices were associated with lower reimbursement for ureteroscopy, but there was no association between location and PCNL reimbursement. Together, these findings suggest practice pattern variation between ureteroscopy and PCNL and highlight gaps in reimbursement policy. Risk-adjusted reimbursement should be considered to incentivize urologists to treat complex patients within their practice scope.

Trends and Factors Associated With Peripheral Vascular Interventions for the Treatment of Claudication From 2011 to 2022: A National Medicare Cohort Study.

Previous cross-sectional studies have identified wide practice pattern variations in the use of peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) for the treatment of claudication. However, there are limited data on longitudinal practice patterns. We aimed to describe the temporal trends and charges associated with PVI use for claudication over the past 12 years in the United States. We conducted a retrospective analysis using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data to identify all patients who underwent a PVI for claudication between January 2011 and December 2022. We evaluated the trends in utilizationand Medicare-allowed charges of PVI according to anatomic level, procedure type, and intervention settings using generalized linear models. Multinomial logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with different levels and types of PVI. We identified 599 197 PVIs performed for claudication. The proportional use of tibial PVI increased 1.0% per year, and atherectomy increased by 1.6% per year over the study period. The proportion of PVIs performed in ambulatory surgical centers/office-based laboratories grew at 4% per year from 12.4% in 2011 to 55.7% in 2022. Total Medicare-allowed charges increased by $11 980 035 USD/year. Multinomial logistic regression identified significant associations between race and ethnicity and treatment setting with use of both atherectomy and tibial PVI. The use of tibial PVI and atherectomy for the treatment of claudication has increased dramatically in in ambulatory surgical center/office-based laboratory settings, non-White patients, and resulting in a significant increase in health care charges. There is a critical need to improve the delivery of value-based care for the treatment of claudication.

Institution-level Patterns of Care for Early-stage Oropharynx Cancers in the United States.

The adoption of transoral robotic surgery and shifting epidemiology in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer have stimulated debate over upfront and adjuvant treatment. Institutional variation in practice patterns can be obscured in patient-level analyses. We aimed to characterize institutional patterns of care as well as identify potential associations between patterns of care and survival. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients identified from 2004-2015 in the National Cancer Database. We analyzed 42,803 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer Stage cT1-2N0-2bM0 (AJCC 7th edition) treated with curative intent surgery and/or radiotherapy. We defined facility-4-year periods to account for changing institutional practice patterns. The 42,803 patients were treated within 2578 facility-4-year periods. We assessed institutional practice patterns, including the ratio of upfront surgery to definitive radiotherapy, case volumes, use of adjuvant therapies (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy), and margin positivity rates. Survival associations with institutional practice patterns were estimated with Cox regression. The ratio of upfront surgery to definitive radiotherapy ranged from 80-to-1 to 1-to-23. The institution-level median rate of adjuvant radiotherapy was 69% (IQR 50%-100%), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 44% (IQR 0%-67%), and margin-positive resection was 33% (IQR 0%-50%). On patient-level MVA, worse overall survival was not significantly associated with institutional case volume, adjuvant radiotherapy, or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy utilization. High rates of multimodal therapy and positive margins underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care and highlight variable patterns of care across institutions. Further work is warranted to explore indicators of high-quality care and to optimize adjuvant therapy in the HPV era.

Clinical Outcomes of Benign Concordant MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies

IntroductionMRI-guided biopsy is the standard of care for breast imaging findings seen only by MRI. Although a non-zero false-negative rate of MRI-guided breast biopsy has been reported by multiple studies, there are varied practice patterns for imaging follow-up after a benign concordant MRI guided biopsy. This study assessed the outcomes of benign concordant MRI-guided biopsies at a single institution. Patients and MethodsThis IRB-approved, retrospective study included patients with MRI-guided biopsies of breast lesions from November 1, 2014, to August 31, 2020. Only image-concordant breast lesions with benign histopathology and those follow up with MRI imaging or excision were included in the study. ResultsOut of 275 lesions in 216 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 274 lesions were followed with MRI (range, 5-79 months; average, 25.5 months) and showed benign or stable features upon follow-up. One out of 275 lesions (0.4%), a 6 mm focal nonmass enhancement, was ultimately found to represent malignancy after initial MRI-guided biopsy yielded fibrocystic changes. The lesion was stable at a 6-month follow-up MRI but increased in size at 18 months. Repeat biopsy by ultrasound guidance yielded invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). ConclusionBreast MRI-guided biopsy has a low false-negative rate. Our single malignancy from a total of 275 lesions gives a false negative rate of 0.4%. This data also supports a longer follow-up interval than the commonly performed 6-month follow-up, in order to assess for interval change.

#2205 Varying practice patterns in prevention, screening and treatment of diabetes early after kidney transplantation: a European survey

Abstract Background and Aims Although post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication after kidney transplantation, there is no consensus on preventive measures, nor on the optimal screening and treatment strategy. Method The European Renal Association—DESCARTES working group—distributed a web-based survey to transplant centers across Europe to gather information on the risk assessment, screening procedures and management practices for the prevention and treatment of PTDM in kidney-transplant recipients. Results Answers were obtained from 121 transplant centers across 15 European countries. Screening practices for pre-existing diabetes during the transplant work-up varied considerably, with only 13% of centers using the recommended oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), while 14% did not screen at all. At transplantation, 19% (n = 23) of centers tailored the immunosuppressive regimen based on perceived PTDM risk, employing strategies like cyclosporin use (12/23), or early steroid withdrawal (2/23). Fifty-two percent adopted strict glycemic control with long-acting insulin in the first days post-transplant. Sixty-eight percent had defined screening protocols for early PTDM (45 days—six months), mostly based on fasting glycemia and/or HbA1c, while only 8/82 incorporated an OGTT. Changes in immunosuppression were considered by 41% in cases of early hyperglycemia (&amp;lt;45 days) and by 58% in established PTDM (&amp;gt;45 days). Besides insulin therapy, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and metformin were most frequently used to manage early hyperglycemia (&amp;lt;45 days) and PTDM (&amp;gt;45 days). Conclusion This European survey underscores significant variation in PTDM prevention, screening, and treatment practices, emphasizing the imperative for clearer guidance in approaching this complication.

Differences in Inpatient Management of Cancer-Related Pain Among Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.

The management of cancer-related pain in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) remains complex and often challenging for clinicians and patients. There is currently a paucity of data to guide best practices, and the evidence that exists is variably applied. In this hospital-based questionnaire, we sought to understand the variation in practice patterns among clinicians in palliative medicine, addiction medicine, and hospital medicine, in caring for this complex patient population. Sixty-two questionnaire responses were analyzed and variation was found in management of pain, as well as initiation or titration of buprenorphine and methadone. There was also a significant difference in postdischarge subspecialty follow-up. Furthermore, the findings suggest that buprenorphine and methadone may be underutilized in this population. Patients and clinicians may benefit from additional support and standardization of practices to best manage coexisting cancer-related pain and OUD.

ASTCT Committee on Practice Guidelines Survey on Evaluation and Management of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma after Failure of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the management of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, CAR-T treatment failure is not uncommon and remains a major therapeutic challenge. There is substantial variability across transplantation and cellular therapy programs in assessing and managing post-CAR-T failures in patients with RRMM. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines conducted an online cross-sectional survey between September 2023 and December 2023 to determine myeloma, transplantation, and cellular therapy physicians' practice patterns for the surveillance, diagnosis, and management of CAR-T failure. The intent of this survey was to understand clinical practice patterns and identify areas for further investigation. Email surveys were sent to 1311 ASTCT physician members, of whom 80 (6.1%) completed the survey. The respondents were 58% white and 66% male, and 51% had >10 years of clinical experience. Most (89%) respondents were affiliated with a university/teaching center, and 56% had a myeloma-focused transplantation and/or cellular therapy practice. Post-CAR-T surveillance laboratory studies were commonly done every 4 weeks, and surveillance bone marrow biopsies and/or imaging surveillance were most commonly done at 3 months. Sixty-four percent of the respondents would often or always consider biopsy or imaging to confirm relapse. The most popular post-CAR-T failure rescue regimen was GPRC5D-directed immunotherapy (30%) for relapses occurring ≤3 months and BCMA-directed bispecific therapies (32.5%) for relapse at >3 months. Forty-one percent of the respondents endorsed post-CAR-T prolonged cytopenia as being "often" or "always" a barrier to next-line therapy; 53% had offered stem cell boost as a mitigation approach. Substantial across-center variation in practice patterns raises the need for collaborative studies and expert clinical recommendations to describe best practices for post-CAR-T disease surveillance, optimal workup for treatment failure, and choice of rescue therapies.

Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders.

Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs.

(016) A Global Survey of Sexual Dysfunction Management among Urologists and Sexual Medicine Experts

Abstract Introduction Understanding and addressing sexual dysfunction is of paramount importance to enhance the overall well-being and quality of life of individuals worldwide. While significant progress has been made in the field of sexual medicine, variability in practice patterns among healthcare professionals remains a potential barrier to optimal patient care. To bridge this knowledge gap and identify the prevailing trends in sexual dysfunction management, we conducted an international survey targeting urologists specializing in Andrology, Sexual Medicine, and related fields. Objective This international survey aimed to assess male and female sexual dysfunction management practices among sexual medicine physicians across to globe to identify variability in practice patterns. Methods A survey was distributed globally to urologists specializing in Andrology, Sexual Medicine, and related fields who are members of International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) or affiliated regional societies (SMSNA, ESSM, MESSM, APSSM, SASSM, SLAMS, ISSWSH, SIU). Demographic information (age, gender, specialty, and practice setting) and treatment approaches for male and female sexual dysfunction were collected. Respondents also reported the percentage of their practice dedicated to sexual dysfunction and whether treatments were covered by health insurance. Results A total of 200/3000 practitioners participated, with 101 (50.7%) identifying as urologists. The majority were male (72.9%) and worked in private practice or community hospitals (32.7%) or a mixture of both (34.2%). Male sexual dysfunction was treated by 71.4% of respondents, with 25.7% dedicating 75–100% of their practice to it. Female sexual dysfunction was treated by 36.9% of respondents, with 64% dedicating 0–25% of their practice to it. Health insurance covered 25–49% of their care for 41.2% of respondents, predominantly provided by private companies (45.9%). The most common treatments for erectile dysfunction were oral medications (86.5%), injections (61.7%), and inflatable penile prostheses (45.1). For Peyronie's disease, oral therapies (59.1%) and penile traction therapy (34.4%) were most frequently offered, while surgical treatment for Peyronie's disease was offered by 58.2% of respondents, with penile prostheses being the primary choice (79.7%). Regarding female sexual dysfunction, 58.4% of respondents offered treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause/atrophic vaginitis, with vaginal estrogen being the most common choice (50%). For dyspareunia due to vaginismus/hypertonic pelvic floor dysfunction, 50.3% of respondents offered treatment, with pelvic floor exercise/physiotherapy being the most recommended (66%). Conclusions This study provides valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers regarding the current landscape of sexual dysfunction management. The results underscore the importance of continuous efforts to develop comprehensive and individualized approaches, ensuring that both male and female patients receive effective and accessible care for their sexual health concerns. By addressing issues related to insurance coverage and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, the medical community can collectively work towards improving sexual well-being and quality of life for patients worldwide. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Advisory board and speaker for Coloplast; consultant for Cynosure; advisory board and speaker for Halozyme; intellectual property with Masimo; advisory board for Promescent; consultant for Sprout; advisory board for Xialla.

Reducing the carbon footprint of operating rooms through education on the effects of inhalation anesthetics on global warming: A retrospective study.

Environmental concerns, especially global warming, have prompted efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Healthcare systems, including anesthesia practices, contribute to these emissions. Inhalation anesthetics have a significant environmental impact, with desflurane being the most concerning because of its high global warming potential. This study aimed to educate anesthesiologists on the environmental impact of inhalation anesthetics and assess changes in awareness and practice patterns, specifically reducing desflurane use. This study included data from patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia 1 month before and after education on the effects of inhalation anesthetics on global warming. The primary endpoint was a change in inhalational anesthetic use. Secondary endpoints included changes in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions, driving equivalent, and medical costs. After the education, desflurane use decreased by 50%, whereas sevoflurane use increased by 50%. This shift resulted in a reduction in the overall amount of inhalational anesthetics used. The total CO2e and driving-equivalent values decreased significantly. The cost per anesthesia case decreased, albeit to a lesser extent than expected. Education on the environmental impact of inhalation anesthetics has successfully altered anesthesiologists' practice patterns, leading to reduced desflurane usage. This change has resulted in decreased CO2e emissions and has had a positive effect on mitigating global warming. However, further research is required to assess the long-term impact of such education and the variability in practice patterns across different institutions.

Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Side-Lying Position in Infant Modified Barium Swallow Studies: A Qualitative Investigation

Purpose: This qualitative study explored the practices of hospital-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducting modified barium swallow studies (MBS) for infants at risk for dysphagia. Specifically, this research aimed to determine whether or not SLPs use side-lying position during MBS, to examine possible differences in the use of positioning, and to better understand SLPs' perceptions and experiences in this practice. Using a constructivist view, research questions guiding this inquiry were as follows: What is the current practice of hospital-based pediatric SLPs in regard to the use of side-lying position during infant MBS? What is the experience of the hospital-based SLP in their use of side-lying position during MBS? How do SLPs report perceived barriers or benefits to using side-lying position during MBS? Method: Employing a purposive-convenience sampling technique, data were collected using semistructured interviews of SLPs serving at-risk infants with dysphagia. All participants were practicing in Level-III or -IV neonatal intensive care units. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, loaded into NVivo, and coded using initial and consensus coding. Themes achieved saturation following six interviews. Results: Three themes emerged from the analysis: (a) variations in practice patterns, (b) factors influencing clinical practice, and (c) items that SLPs identified as needs to facilitate change in their clinical practice. Conclusions: Although SLPs acknowledged the importance of MBS replicating an infant's typical feeding, some SLPs who consistently use side-lying position during feeding do not assess feeding in side-lying position during MBS. This inconsistency in practice results from SLPs' perceived barriers, including lack of experience, concern over interdisciplinary conflict, need for MBS protocols, and lack of research on the potential impacts of side-lying positioning on swallowing. Participants reported the need for research to determine whether side-lying position alters, possibly improves, swallow functions and safety (e.g., airway protection) for at-risk infants.

Trends in cardiac CT utilization for patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease: A multicenter survey study

BackgroundThe use of cardiac CT (CCT) has increased dramatically in recent years among patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD), but little is known about trends and practice pattern variation in CCT utilization for this population among centers. MethodsA 21-item survey was created to assess CCT utilization in the pediatric/CHD population in calendar years 2011 and 2021. The survey was sent to all non-invasive cardiac imaging directors of pediatric cardiology centers in North America in September 2022. ResultsForty-one centers completed the survey. In 2021, 98% of centers performed CCT in pediatric and CHD patients (vs. 73% in 2011), and 61% of centers performed >100 CCTs annually (vs. 5% in 2011). While 62% of centers in 2021 utilized dual-source technology for high-pitch helical acquisition, 15% of centers reported primarily performing CCT on a 64-slice scanner. Anesthesia utilization, use of medications for heart rate control, and type of subspecialty training for physicians interpreting CCT varied widely among centers. 50% of centers reported barriers to CCT performance, with the most commonly cited concerns being radiation exposure, the need for anesthesia, and limited CT scan staffing or machine access. 37% (11/30) of centers with a pediatric cardiology fellowship program offer no clinical or didactic CCT training for categorical fellows. ConclusionWhile CCT usage in the CHD/pediatric population has risen significantly in the past decade, there is broad center variability in CCT acquisition techniques, staffing, workflow, and utilization. Potential areas for improvement include expanding CT scanner access and staffing, formal CCT education for pediatric cardiology fellows, and increasing utilization of existing technological advances.

(363) A Global Survey of Sexual Dysfunction Management Among Urologists and Sexual Medicine Experts

Abstract Introduction Understanding and addressing sexual dysfunction is of paramount importance to enhance the overall well-being and quality of life of individuals worldwide. While significant progress has been made in the field of sexual medicine, variability in practice patterns among healthcare professionals remains a potential barrier to optimal patient care. To bridge this knowledge gap and identify the prevailing trends in sexual dysfunction management, we conducted an international survey targeting urologists specializing in Andrology, Sexual Medicine, and related fields. Objective This international survey aimed to assess male and female sexual dysfunction management practices among sexual medicine physicians across to globe to identify variability in practice patterns. Methods A survey was distributed globally to urologists specializing in Andrology, Sexual Medicine, and related fields who are members of International Society for Sexual Medicine (ISSM) or affiliated regional societies (SMSNA, ESSM, MESSM, APSSM, SASSM, SLAMS, ISSWSH, SIU). Demographic information (age, gender, specialty, and practice setting) and treatment approaches for male and female sexual dysfunction were collected. Respondents also reported the percentage of their practice dedicated to sexual dysfunction and whether treatments were covered by health insurance. Results A total of 200/3000 practitioners participated, with 101 (50.7%) identifying as urologists. The majority were male (72.9%) and worked in private practice or community hospitals (32.7%) or a mixture of both (34.2%). Male sexual dysfunction was treated by 71.4% of respondents, with 25.7% dedicating 75-100% of their practice to it. Female sexual dysfunction was treated by 36.9% of respondents, with 64% dedicating 0-25% of their practice to it. Health insurance covered 25-49% of their care for 41.2% of respondents, predominantly provided by private companies (45.9%). The most common treatments for erectile dysfunction were oral medications (86.5%), injections (61.7%), and inflatable penile prostheses (45.1). For Peyronie's disease, oral therapies (59.1%) and penile traction therapy (34.4%) were most frequently offered, while surgical treatment for Peyronie's disease was offered by 58.2% of respondents, with penile prostheses being the primary choice (79.7%). Regarding female sexual dysfunction, 58.4% of respondents offered treatments for genitourinary syndrome of menopause/atrophic vaginitis, with vaginal estrogen being the most common choice (50%). For dyspareunia due to vaginismus/hypertonic pelvic floor dysfunction, 50.3% of respondents offered treatment, with pelvic floor exercise/physiotherapy being the most recommended (66%). Conclusions This study provides valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers regarding the current landscape of sexual dysfunction management. The results underscore the importance of continuous efforts to develop comprehensive and individualized approaches, ensuring that both male and female patients receive effective and accessible care for their sexual health concerns. By addressing issues related to insurance coverage and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, the medical community can collectively work towards improving sexual well-being and quality of life for patients worldwide. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Advisory board and speaker for Coloplast; consultant for Cynosure; advisory board and speaker for Halozyme; intellectual property with Masimo; advisory board for Promescent; consultant for Sprout; advisory board for Xialla.

How are Oral Antibiotics Being Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review of the Literature.

While the role and benefit of perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is well-established, oral antibiotic use in TJA remains a controversial topic with wide variations in practice patterns. With this review, we aimed to better educate the orthopedic surgeon on when and how oral antibiotics may be used most effectively in TJA patients, and to identify gaps in the literature that could be clarified with targeted research. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) use in high-risk primary, aseptic revision, and exchange TJA for infection may be useful in decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. When prescribing oral antibiotics either as EOAP or for draining wounds, patient factors, type of surgery, and type of infectious organisms should be considered in order to optimally prevent and treat PJI. It is important to maintain antibiotic stewardship by administering the proper duration, dose, and type of antibiotics and by consulting infectious disease when necessary.

Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment for Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

The decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is challenging for clinicians and families with limited evidence quantifying existing practices. Given the lack of standardized clinical guidelines, variable practice patterns across trauma centers seem likely. To evaluate the factors influencing decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment across North American trauma centers for pediatric patients with severe TBI and to quantify any existing between-center variability in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment practices. This retrospective cohort study used data collected from 515 trauma centers through the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2020. Pediatric patients younger than 19 years with severe TBI and a documented decision for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were included. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023. A random intercept multilevel logistic regression model was used to quantify patient, injury, and hospital characteristics associated with the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment; the median odds ratio was used to characterize residual between-center variability. Centers were ranked by their conditional random intercepts and quartile-specific adjusted mortalities were computed. A total of 9803 children (mean [SD] age, 12.6 [5.7]; 2920 [29.8%] female) with severe TBI were identified, 1003 of whom (10.2%) had a documented decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Patient-level factors associated with an increase in likelihood of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment were young age (younger than 3 years), higher severity intracranial and extracranial injuries, and mechanism of injury related to firearms. Following adjustment for patient and hospital attributes, the median odds ratio was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.46-1.62), suggesting residual variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment between centers. When centers were grouped into quartiles by their propensity for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, adjusted mortality was higher for fourth-quartile compared to first-quartile centers (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.45-1.88). Several patient and injury factors were associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment decision-making for pediatric patients with severe TBI in this study. Variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment practices between trauma centers was observed after adjustment for case mix; this variation was associated with differences in risk-adjusted mortality rates. Taken together, these findings highlight the presence of inconsistent approaches to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in children, which speaks to the need for guidelines to address this significant practice pattern variation.

What would you do? A survey of HPB surgeons practice patterns

BackgroundThe surgical decision making for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is complex. Although practice guidelines exist for many scenarios, these do not cover many common eventualities that may be encountered during these cases. We sought to identify the practice pattern variations amongst pancreatic surgeons in response to commonly experienced clinical scenarios. MethodsA multiple-choice questionnaire was distributed to all full members of the IHPBA. Participant demographics, training history, and clinical practice information were obtained. The survey provided various operative scenarios and participants were asked how they would likely proceed. Responses were collected and stored anonymously in a secure database. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 16.0. Results164 responses were submitted. Most of the respondents were male and had been in practice for over 10 years. The median age range was 40–50 years old. When asked about staging laparoscopy, the majority performed it selectively.For most respondents a pathological aorto-caval nodes was a reason to abort the procedure but most would have continued in the setting of a positive hepatic artery node.When encountering a single Segment 2 liver metastasis, participants who practiced in Europe were significantly more likely to resect and proceed compared to those in Asia and North America. Participants who had undergone only a Surgical Oncology fellowship were most likely to abort.With respect to direct colonic invasion, most participants would resect the specimen en bloc. Respondents who participated in fewer that 20 PDAC operations/year were most likely to abort. ConclusionsSurgical decision making in PDAC surgery is complex and there is significant disagreement on the correct management. While formal guidelines cannot exist for all situations, this survey highlights the need for consensus on commonly encountered operative scenarios.

Investigator attitudes on equipoise and practice patterns in the BEST-CLI trial

ObjectivesThere has been significant variability in practice patterns and equipoise regarding treatment approach for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We aimed to assess treatment preferences of Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) investigators prior to and following the trial. MethodsAn electronic 60-question survey was sent to 1180 BEST-CLI investigators in 2022, after trial conclusion and before announcement of results. Investigators' preferences were assessed across clinical scenarios for both open (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) revascularization strategies. Vascular surgeon (VS) surgical and ENDO preferences were compared with a 2010 survey administered to prospective investigators before trial funding. ResultsFor the 2022 survey, the response rate was 20.2% and was comprised of VSs (76.3%), interventional cardiologists (11.4%) and interventional radiologists (11.6%). The majority (72.6%) were in academic practice and 39.1% were in practice for >20 years. During initial CLTI work-up, 65.8%, 42.6%, and 55.9% of respondents always or usually ordered an arterial duplex, computed tomography angiography, and vein mapping, respectively. The most common practice distribution between ENDO and OPEN procedures was 70/30. Postoperatively, a majority reported performing routine duplex surveillance of vein bypass (99%), prosthetic bypass (81.9%), and ENDO interventions (86%). A minority reported always or usually using the wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) criteria (25.8%), GLASS (8.3%), and a risk calculator (14.8%). More than one-half (52.9%) agreed that the statement “no bridges are burned with an ENDO-first approach” was false. Intervention choice was influenced by availability of the operating room or ENDO suite, personal schedule, and personal skill set in 30.1%, 18.0%, and 45.9% of respondents, respectively. Most respondents reported routinely using paclitaxel-coated balloons (88.1%) and stents (67.5%); however, 73.3% altered practice when safety concerns were raised. Among surgeons, 17.8%, 2.9%, and 10.3% reported performing >10 annual alternative autogenous vein bypasses, composite vein composite vein bypasses, and bypasses to pedal targets, respectively. Among all interventionalists, 8%, 24%, and 8% reported performing >10 annual radial access procedures, pedal or tibial access procedures, and pedal loop revascularizations. The majority (89.1%) of respondents felt that CLTI teams improved care; however, only 23.2% had a defined team. The effectiveness of the teamwork at institutions was characterized as highly effective in 42.5%. When comparing responses by VSs to the 2010 survey, there were no changes in preferred treatment based on Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II classification or conduit preference. In 2022, OPEN surgery was preferred more for a popliteal occlusion. For clinical scenarios, there were no differences except a decreased proportion of respondents who felt there was equipoise for major tissue loss for major tissue loss (43.8% vs 31.2%) and increased ENDO choice for minor tissue loss (17.6% vs 30.8%) (P < .05). ConclusionsThere is a wide range of practice patterns among vascular specialists treating CLTI. The majority of investigators in BEST-CLI had experience in both advanced OPEN and ENDO techniques and represent a real-world sample of technical expertise. Over the course of the decade of the BEST-CLI trial, there was overall similar equipoise among VSs.

Research Priorities in CriticalCareCardiology: JACC Expert Panel.

Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.

Attitudes of Hematologists in the Midwestern United States Toward Evaluating and Managing Thrombosis Risk in Transgender Youth Starting Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy

Background: Transgender and gender nonconforming (TG) youth who are at increased risk of thrombosis may be evaluated by a hematologist to discuss thromboprophylaxis prior to starting gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). However, in the absence of guidelines to inform the delivery of hematologic care to such youth, variations in practice patterns may lead to suboptimal care for these individuals. Aim: Determine hematologists' recommendations about which TG youth should be considered at higher risk of thrombosis, laboratory evaluation and medical management of such youth, and which youth should be referred for hematologic evaluation prior to starting GAHT. Methods: From 6/2022-2/2023, we recruited hematologists caring for patients 13-22 years-old and practicing in the Midwestern U.S. for individual semi-structured interviews. Hematologists were recruited from the institutions in the footprint of the Midwest Transgender Research Collaborative. Interviews assessed demographics, practice characteristics, comfort recommending and prescribing thromboprophylaxis to TG youth, and recommendations for 1) which youth TG youth would be considered at higher risk of thrombosis; 2) laboratory evaluation; 3) recommended thromboprophylactic medication and duration; and 4) which TG youth should undergo hematologic evaluation prior to GAHT. Transcripts were analyzed using team-based framework analysis. The study was IRB approved; informed consent was obtained. Results: Eleven hematologists from 4 academic centers participated. Mean age was 50.5 years (SD 7.2); 9 participants identified as white; 2 were Latino/a. Ten participants had provided care to TG adolescents (13-17 years-old); all 11 had provided care to TG young adults (18-22 years-old). Participants reported on average 2.8 (SD 3.3) TG adolescents and 2.5 (SD 2.9) TG young adults in their practices. Ten participants reported comfort with recommending and prescribing thromboprophylaxis to patients at higher risk of thrombosis starting estrogen for GAHT; counseling about knowledge gaps and engaging in shared decision making were important elements in the process. One participant reported preference for non-medication interventions, such as compression stockings and using lower doses or transdermal formulations of estrogen. There was less consensus around attitudes toward prophylaxis for youth starting testosterone for GAHT: 4 participants reported lower likelihood of recommending thromboprophylaxis due to low risk of thrombosis with testosterone use; 3 participants discussed risk of erythrocytosis/polycythemia due to testosterone use (although there was no consensus on whether prophylaxis would be recommended); 3 participants reported comfort prescribing prophylaxis to youth starting testosterone; and 2 participants reported insufficient knowledge about the thrombotic risks of testosterone. Hematologists reported various factors that would lead to TG youth being considered high risk, as well as recommended lab testing (Table 1). If prophylaxis is needed, 10 participants would recommend a direct anticoagulant, while 1 would recommend aspirin. Five participants anticipated that long term prophylaxis would be needed for the duration of GAHT, while 6 reported duration would be individualized. Ten participants would not recommend against estrogen due to thrombosis risk, emphasizing the importance of gender care and the role of the hematologist in making GAHT as safe as possible. No participant would recommend against testosterone. Participants offered recommendations for which TG youth should be evaluated by a hematologist prior to starting GAHT (Table 2). Conclusion: Overall, hematologists voiced comfort with recommending and prescribing thromboprophylaxis to TG youth at higher risk of thrombosis starting estrogen. However, there was lack of consensus about evaluation of youth at higher risk of thrombosis starting testosterone and whether mitigation of risk would be needed. Developing guidance for gender care teams for which youth should be considered at higher risk of thrombosis and referred for hematologic evaluation would help optimize the safe delivery of gender-affirming hormone care. Additional data and guidance about the thrombosis risks associated with GAHT is needed to better inform hematologic care. Funding: NIH R01HL161153; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Gap Funding

Variation in Practice Patterns of Early- and Later-Career Family Physicians.

Understanding how physicians' practice patterns change over a career is important for workforce and medical education planning. This study examined trends in self-reported practice activity among early- and later-career stage family physicians (FPs). Data on early career FPs came from the American Board of Family Medicine's National Graduate Survey (NGS) and on later career FPs from its Continuous Certification Questionnaire (CCQ). Both cohorts could complete the Practice Demographic Survey (PDS) 3 years later. Longitudinal cohorts were from 2016 to 2019 and 2017 to 2020, respectively. All surveys included identical items on scope of practice, practice type, organization, and location. We characterized physicians as outpatient continuity only, outpatient and inpatient care (mixed practice), and no outpatient continuity (for example, hospitalist). We conducted repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of practice type. Our sample included 8,492 NGS and 30,491 CCQ FPs. In both groups, the vast majority provided outpatient continuity of care (77% to 81%). Approximately 25% of NGS had a mixed practice compared with approximately 16% of the CCQ group. The percent of FPs who had a mixed practice declined in both groups (34.21% to 27.10% and 23.88% to 19.33%). In both groups, physicians with higher odds of leaving mixed practice were in metropolitan counties or changed practice types. Although early-career FPs more frequently reported providing both inpatient and outpatient care and serving as hospitalists compared with later-career FPs, both groups had a decline in frequency of providing mixed practice. This change after only 3 years in practice has significant implications for patient care and medical education.