Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Fractures Research Articles

Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.

Currently, accepted treatment for periprosthetic femoral fractures with loose femoral stem indicates its revision; however, recent studies have proposed treating Vancouver type B2 fractures via internal fixation without stem revision, particularly in the elderly or multi-morbid patients. Despite indications for stem revision, some surgeons tend to perform internal fixation. The main goal of this study was therefore to identify the parameters that were significantly different comparing internal fixation to stem revision for Vancouver type B2 fractures. Eighty-one Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, treated between 2010 and 2019, were analysed. The internal fixation (ORIF) and the revision groups were compared. Patients' age, BMI, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, anaesthesia type, operating time, blood loss, surgeons' experience, post-operative weight-bearing, length of hospital stay, and radiological outcome using AGORA roentgenographic assessment were analysed. Patients chosen for ORIF were significantly older than those treated by stem revision (85.4 vs 75.1 years; p = 0.002). Blood loss was 390.7 and 1141.6 ml in the ORIF and revision groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The surgical times were 134.5 and 225 min in the ORIF and revision groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Our analysis of BMI, ASA score, anaesthesia type, length of hospital stay, surgeons' experience and radiological outcome, were not significantly different between the two groups. Revision did not exhibit better radiological results; moreover, internal fixation resulted in significantly less perioperative blood loss and a shorter operating time, concluding that ORIF is a viable alternative to revision arthroplasty, particularly in older patients.

The influence of femoral component design on postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture after uncemented direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in the elderly

IntroductionAging populations and expanding indications will greatly increase the volume of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in all age groups, including patients over 70 years old. Minimally invasive, uncemented direct anterior THA offers potential advantages for treating elderly patients. However, literature indicates higher risks of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) with both direct anterior THA and uncemented femoral stems. This retrospective study investigates the influence of femoral stem design on PPFF incidence in uncemented direct anterior THA among patients older than 70 years. Methods557 primary THAs in patients aged 70 or over were reviewed for PPFFs from a consecutive series of 2011 patients undergoing direct anterior THA from a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon from 2015 to 2020. Exclusion criteria included age (<70) and posterior approach. For the first cohort of 361 patients (79 of which passed exclusion criteria) the surgeon used a single-tapered, proximally porous coated, collarless titanium stem. For the next 1650, (478 of which passed exclusion), the surgeon used a dual-tapered, collared, hydroxyapatite-coated titanium stem. Included patients were carefully monitored until March 2021 for PPFFs. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidence PPFFs between the 2 implant designs. Results2 of 79 (2.5%) patients had atraumatic PPFFs at an average of 19.5 days post-operatively in the first cohort. Both experienced a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture and required femoral revision. No patients (0/478, 0%) in the second group sustained a PPFF. (P = 0.0199). ConclusionIn this comparison, the dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant had a significantly lower PPFF rate among elderly patients than a single-taper, proximally porous stem without a collar.

Atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy

BackgroundAtypical femoral fracture is one of the many complications after the long-term use of bisphosphonates. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research has officially excluded periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) from the definition of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs). Several case reports found that PFFs can occur with characteristics similar to those of AFFs. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the proportion of atypical fractures among Vancouver type B1 fractures, and to determine the association between the long-term use of bisphosphonates and the occurrence of atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures (APFFs).MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed 41 patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018. We classified them into two groups, namely atypical and typical PFFs, based on the fracture morphology. We noted the proportion of atypical periprosthetic fractures among B1 fractures and identified risk factors.ResultsAmong the 41 PFFs, 5 (13%) fractures were classified as atypical PFF based on the radiological characteristics. The longer duration of bisphosphonate use was probably the only independent risk factor that significantly increases the occurrence of APFF (p = 0.03, 0.08 (CI 0.008 – 0.16)). There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, corticosteroid use, positioning of the femoral stem, the method of fixation (cemented or cementless) and time lapse from before the primary prosthesis implantation to the PFF in the development of atypical fracture type.ConclusionsThere seems to be a correlation between the long-term intake of bisphosphonates and the atypical periprosthetic fracture. Atypical femoral fracture can also occur in the periprosthetic form.Trial registrationStudy number: 22/2019-SZTE, http://www.klinikaikutatas.hu/hu/kutatasetika/jovahagyott-vizsgalatok-koezerdeku-adatai/category/25-jovahagyott-vizsgalatok-kozerdeku-adatai-rkeb-2019.html?download=985:22-2019.

Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem's design.

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures versus stem revision (SR) surgery. Between 2004 and 2018, 39 patients were treated with SR and 31 with ORIF for a Vancouver type B2. Mean follow-up was 40.4months for the ORIF group and 43.5months for the SR group. 22 of 31 stems in the ORIF group were uncemented, of which 7 (23%) were short stems. Perioperative complications, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, and mortality were recorded. Functional outcomes included Harris Hip Score, Parker Mobility Score and hip abductor strength. Both groups did not differ in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, age, and sex. Compared to SR, patients treated with ORIF had a decreased blood loss, transfusion rate, operation duration, and mortality. Total complication and re-operation rates were similar. The relative risk for complication and re-operation was 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, in favour of ORIF. ORIF might be a valuable alternative to SR in the treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures with shorter operation duration, lower blood loss and similar complication rate compared to SR. Moreover, re-stabilization seems possible irrespective of stem's design or fixation technique. Level III.

Vancouver type-b1 periprosthetic fracture managed with locked compression plate: A case report

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem is increasing. These are very challenging fractures and need adequate surgical expertise. There is no clear consensus regarding the management of these fractures, especially Vancouver type-B fractures. We report a case of Vancouver type-B1 fracture managed only with locked compression plate in a 70-year-old man. Fracture united at 3 months and at one year the patient had excellent functional and radiological outcome.

Cable plate fixation for Vancouver Type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures-Our experience and identification of a subset at risk of non-union

IntroductionManagement of periprosthetic femoral fractures is challenging. Vancouver classification is universally accepted for fracture description and management algorithm. Guidelines for the treatment of type B1 fracture is open reduction and internal fixation. The difficulty involved in managing this group is evidenced by the array of treatment options described in the literature. MethodsThirty two patients with Vancouver type B1 fracture treated with osteosynthesis using cable plate (between 2007 and 2015) were reviewed retrospectively. There were 21 females and 11 males with an average age of 81yrs (56–96 years). The average follow-up was 21 months. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically until fracture united or patient re-operated. Postoperative protocol followed was six weeks toe touch weight bearing, 6 weeks partial weight bearing and then full weight bearing if there was no displacement. Post-operative radiographs were evaluated for fracture union. Statistical analysis was done using contingency tables with Fishers exact test and a p-value < 0.05 for significance. ResultsIn twenty four patients fracture union was achieved. Non-union was recorded in four patients. Comparing the different fracture patterns all non-unions occurred in the fractures which were short oblique or transverse at the cemented stem tip (p = 0.001). Fractures were more common in female patients and associated more with the uncemented femoral stems, but it was not associated with increased rate of non-union (p = 0.68). All failed osteosynthesis were revised successfully using long stem prosthesis. Two patients died within 2 months, one patient died within 4 months, one patient was lost to follow-up. ConclusionTransverse or short oblique periprosthetic fractures around tip of cemented femoral stems can have high failure rates with just internal fixation. Revision arthroplasty may be the preferred option if possible otherwise may need to supplement fixation with cortical onlay graft. We should consider subcategorising Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures into groups based on the pattern and fracture level in relation to the femoral stem.

Prevalence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Between Two Different Femoral Component Designs Used in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femur fractures are a well-documented complication following direct anterior uncemented total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures between 2 different femoral component designs used in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. MethodsBeginning in February 2015, a single fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon performed 361 consecutive direct anterior total hip replacements using a flat, single-taper, wedged femoral implant. In June 2016, that same surgeon, using the exact same surgical technique and postoperative weight-bearing protocol, began using a dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant for 789 consecutive hips. The patients were carefully monitored for 3 months after surgery to identify the frequency of periprosthetic femur fractures. A Fisher’s exact test was used to determine if the prevalence of periprosthetic femur fractures differed between the 2 implant designs. ResultsFive of 361 (1.4%) patients sustained proximal femur fractures at an average of 19.6 days postoperatively in the first group, all demonstrating a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture and requiring femoral revision. No patients (0/789, 0%) in the second cohort sustained a postoperative, periprosthetic fracture (P = .006). ConclusionIn this comparison of 2 consecutive cohorts, the dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant had a statistically significant lower postoperative periprosthetic fracture rate than a flat, single-taper, wedged design.

Outcome of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture in hemiarthroplasty by trochanter hook plate

Outcome of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture in hemiarthroplasty by trochanter hook plate

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain one of the most challenging complications to address. Although the principal treatment modalities for Vancouver type B1 fractures are open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), surgeons have not yet reached a consensus on the optimal method for reduction and fixation. We therefore investigated whether minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking compression plate (LCP) would lead to favorable outcomes for patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs. In addition, we also compared the outcomes of patients treated with MIPO to those treated with ORIF. MethodWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of 21 Vancouver type B1 PFFs treated with MIPO and LCP between February 2011 and February 2017. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.8 months. We also compared outcomes of these patients to those of patients with 19 Vancouver type B1 fractures treated with ORIF between April 2006 and December 2011. ResultsFracture healing without complications was achieved in 20 (95.2%) out of 21 cases in the MIPO group and in 14 (87.5%) out of 16 cases in the ORIF group. There was one case of fixation failure with stem subsidence in the MIPO group. In the ORIF group, there were 2 nonunion with metal failure. Operation time was significantly shorter and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIPO group compared to the ORIF group. However, there were no significant differences in frequency of transfusion, time-to-union, walking abilities, modified Harris hip score, or complications. ConclusionThe radiological and clinical outcomes of MIPO using LCP in patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs were shown not to be inferior to ORIF and resulted in fewer intraoperative complications than ORIF. If care is taken regarding the stability of femoral implant and optimal surgical techniques, MIPO may be a recommended option in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture.

An international, cross-sectional survey of the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties

IntroductionThe incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasties is increasing. Fractures around a stable implant stem (Vancouver type B1) are among the most common of these fractures. Various fixation strategies for Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures have been reported in the literature; however, little high-level evidence exists. This study was designed to determine the current management strategies and opinions among orthopaedic surgeons treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures, and to evaluate the need for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for the management of these injuries. MethodsOrthopaedic surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA), the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA), and the Hip Society were invited to participate in a 51-item web-based survey surrounding the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip replacements, as well as the perceived need for future research in this area. Responses were summarized using proportions, and further stratified by practice type, case volume, surgeon age, and fellowship training. ResultsFor Vancouver type B1 fractures, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked plating was favoured slightly over ORIF with cable plating ± cortical strut allograft (51.1% versus 45.5%). When compared to cable plating with cortical strut allograft, respondents believed that isolated locked plating resulted in lower nonunion and reoperation rates, but similar infection and malunion rates. Subgroup analyses revealed that practice type, surgeon age, case volume, and fellowship training influenced surgeons’ management of periprosthetic femoral fractures and beliefs regarding complications. There is high demand for a large prospective randomized controlled trial for Vancouver type B1 fracture fixation. ConclusionsConsensus surrounding the management of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures is lacking, and there is a perceived need among orthopaedic surgeons for a large prospective randomized controlled trial in order to define the optimal management of these injuries.

Biomechanical evaluation of fracture fixation constructs using a variable-angle locked periprosthetic femur plate system

BackgroundIn the United States there are more than 230,000 total hip replacements annually, and periprosthetic femoral fractures occur in 0.1–4.5% of those patients. The majority of these fractures occur at the tip of the stem (Vancouver type B1). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanically stability and strength of three fixation constructs and identify the most desirable construct. MethodsFifteen medium adult synthetic femurs were implanted with a hip prosthesis and were osteotomized in an oblique plane at the level of the implant tip to simulate a Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture. Fractures were fixed with a non-contact bridging periprosthetic proximal femur plate (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN). Three proximal fixation methods were used: Group 1, bicortical screws; Group 2, unicortical screws and one cerclage cable; and Group 3, three cerclage cables. Distally, all groups had bicortical screws. Biomechanical testing was performed using an axial–torsional testing machine in three different loading modalities (axial compression, lateral bending, and torsional/sagittal bending), next in axial cyclic loading to 10,000 cycles, again in the three loading modalities, and finally to failure in torsional/sagittal bending. ResultsGroup 1 had significantly greater load to failure and was significantly stiffer in torsional/sagittal bending than Groups 2 and 3. After cyclic loading, Group 2 had significantly greater axial stiffness than Groups 1 and 3. There was no difference between the three groups in lateral bending stiffness. The average energy absorbed during cyclic loading was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Groups 1 and 3. ConclusionsBicortical screw placement achieved the highest load to failure and the highest torsional/sagittal bending stiffness. Additional unicortical screws improved axial stiffness when using cable fixation. Lateral bending was not influenced by differences in proximal fixation. Clinical relevanceTo treat periprosthetic fractures, bicortical screw placement should be attempted to maximize load to failure and torsional/sagittal bending stiffness.

Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo use finite element analysis to study the stability of different fixation methods used to repair Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures occurring after total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsAn artificial femur was used as the basis for the solid model; U2 series femoral stem (United Orthopedic Corporation, Hsinchu, Taiwan) was used for modelling of the prosthesis; and the modelling of the cable plate, wires and screws was based on information given in the manufacturer's catalogue (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). The analysis model was constructed using the ANSYS software, and all material settings were based on literature values. A six-orifice cable plate, unicortical screws (20mm long and 4.5mm in diameter) and bicortical screws (50mm long and 4.5mm in diameter) were constructed. Four analysis models were defined. The basic model had a plate and three cable wires above the fracture line and two bicortical screws below the fracture line. In the second model, two unicortical screws were added above the fracture line. In the third model, three wires were added below the fracture line. In the fourth model, both the proximal screws of the second model and the distal wires of the third model were added to the basic model. To ensure that the numerical values produced by analysis reached convergence, mesh convergence was tested. ResultsAdding two proximal unicortical screws to the basic Ogden construct (plate, proximal wires and distal screws) lessened displacement of the fracture and decreased the von Mises stress on the repair. Adding three distal wires to the basic construct had no noticeable effect. ConclusionBetter fixation power is achieved by using both proximal and distal screws (the locking-plate concept) in treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture after THA.

Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

Objective Report treatment results of periprosthetic femoral fractures adjacent or at the tip of a stable femoral stem (Vancouver Type B1) using a locked compression plate as the sole method of fracture stabilisation. Design Retrospective case series. Setting Academic Level I Trauma Centre. Patients Patients operatively treated at our institution with locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic fractures between 2002 and 2006 with at least 12 weeks of clinical follow-up were included. Patient demographics, hip arthroplasty implant characteristics, and AO/OTA fracture type were recorded. Intervention Open reduction internal fixation using a locked-plate spanning a majority of the femur through a lateral soft-tissue sparing approach. No cortical onlay allografts or cerclage devices (wires or cables) were used. Main outcome measurements Clinical union was defined at a minimum of 12 weeks as ability to walk, with or without the use of a walking aide, without pain at or around the fracture site. Radiographic union was defined by bridging bone spanning two or more cortices on orthogonal radiographs of the femur. Results Ten subjects met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a mean of 27 weeks (range 14–97 weeks). All achieved fracture union at a mean of 17 weeks (range 12–27 weeks). There were no hardware failures or changes in fracture alignment from operative radiographs. There were no major complications that necessitated reoperation. Conclusions Open reduction internal fixation of Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures using a lateral locked-plate that spans the full extent of the femur as the sole method of stabilisation is a successful treatment method that minimises soft-tissue dissection and provides adequate fixation strength to maintain fracture alignment to fracture union.

Fixation of Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures Adjacent to a Well-Fixed Femoral Stem With Reversed Distal Femoral Locking Plate

Numerous fixation methods have been described for the fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures, but there have been a very few reports in the literature regarding the use of locking plates and their outcomes for this fracture. The objective of this study was to analyze clinically and radiographically, the results of fixation of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures with a reversed distal femoral locking plate. Thirteen consecutive patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture were stabilized with reversed distal femoral locking plate. Patients were followed up at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 weeks and yearly thereafter. They were assessed clinically and radiographically for union, delayed union, malunion, hardware failure, nonunion, infection, and stability of the femoral prosthesis. The average duration of follow-up was 18 months. All fractures healed at an average of 14 weeks from fixation. Complications include superficial wound infection in one and flare-up of previous infection in one with union at 20 and 28 weeks, respectively. Twelve femoral prostheses were stable and all patients were ambulatory, with or without a walking aid at final follow-up. There was no hardware failure or nonunion. Reversed distal femoral locking plate treatment is a feasible and effective choice for stabilization with femoral stem retention after Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture in an elderly patient population.

The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures

To assess the outcome of patients with Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision using an uncemented extensively porous-coated implant. From October 2002 to May 2007, a retrospective clinical and radiographic assessment of 10 patients with Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral revision was evaluated, among which 4 was cement fixation, 6 was non-cement fixation in the index procedure. The mean follow-up for these patients was 44 months (range, 12 to 67 months). The mean Harris hip score was 87.6 points. All 10 reconstructions showed solid fracture union and a stable prosthesis, 8 was bone ingrowth, 2 was fibrous ingrowth. Complications in 4 patients included thigh pain in 1, stress shield in 3. Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated with uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral stems incorporate distally allowing stable fixation.

Fixation of Vancouver B1 peri-prosthetic fractures by broad metal plates without the application of strut allografts

The use of allograft struts and cerclage wire, possibly augmented by plate fixation, for the treatment of Vancouver type-B1 peri-prosthetic fractures around a total hip replacement has been strongly advocated. We examined our results using plate fixation without allograft struts and compared them with the results of the use of struts alone or when combined with plate fixation. Of 20 consecutive patients with type-B1 fractures treated by open reduction and plate fixation, 19 were available for follow-up. The fractures healed in 18 patients with a mean time to weight-bearing of ten weeks (4 to 19). There were no cases of infection or malunion. Nonunion occurred in one patient and required a second plate fixation to achieve union. Safe, cost-effective treatment of Vancouver type-B1 fractures can be performed by plate fixation without the addition of cortical struts. This procedure may allow earlier weight-bearing than allograft strut fixation alone.

Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients

Periprosthetic fractures around hip prostheses are difficult problems. We reviewed the results of treatment with Wagner revision stems in geriatric patients (≥ 65 years old) with Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures. Over a 5-year period, 14 patients with Vancouver’s type B2 periprosthetic fractures in the proximal femur were revised. The mean follow-up for these patients was 58.5 months (range, 36 to 64 months). The average age was 74.5 years (67 to 83 years). Twelve patients were available for assessment; all 12 reconstructions showed a stable prosthesis and solid fracture union. Seven patients had excellent outcome, 3 had a good outcome, and 2 had a poor outcome. Our series shows that the Wagner revision stem is a satisfactory prosthesis in revision of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures in geriatric patients.