Vancouver B3 Periprosthetic Fractures Research Articles

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular fluted, tapered revision femoral component and interlocking screws in Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures with insufficient bone at the isthmus.

Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with Vancouver type B3 fractures with Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV femoral defects are difficult to treat. One option for Paprovsky type IIIB and IV defects involves modular cementless, tapered, revision femoral components in conjunction with distal interlocking screws. The aim of this study was to analyze the rate of reoperations and complications and union of the fracture, subsidence of the stem, mortality, and the clinical outcomes in these patients. A total of 46 femoral components in patients with Vancouver B3 fractures (23 with Paprosky type IIIA, 19 with type IIIB, and four with type IV defects) in 46 patients were revised with a transfemoral approach using a modular, tapered, cementless revision Revitan curved femoral component with distal cone-in-cone fixation and prospectively followed for a mean of 48.8 months (SD 23.9; 24 to 112). The mean age of the patients was 80.4 years (66 to 100). Additional distal interlocking was also used in 23 fractures in which distal cone-in-cone fixation in the isthmus was < 3 cm. One patient (2.2%) died during the first postoperative year. After six months, 43 patients (93.5%) had osseous, and three had fibrous consolidation of the fracture and the bony flap, 42 (91.3%) had bony ingrowth and four had stable fibrous fixation of the stem. No patient had radiolucency around the interlocking screws and no screw broke. One patient had non-progressive subsidence and two had a dislocation. The mean Harris Hip Score increased from of 57.8 points (SD 7.9) three months postoperatively to 76.1 points (SD 10.7) 24 months postoperatively. The 2° tapered, fluted revision femoral component with distal cone-in-cone-fixation, combined with additional distal interlocking in patients with bony deficiency at the isthmus, led to reproducibly good results in patients with a Vancouver B3 fracture and Paprosky type IIIA, IIIB, and IV defects with regard to union of the fracture, subsidence or loosening of the stem, and clinical outcomes.

Atypical Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur in the United Kingdom: a case report challenged by myeloma, osteoporosis, infection, and recurrent implant failures

The indications for total hip replacement are increasing and not limited to osteoarthritis. Total hip replacement may also be done for trauma and pathological fractures in patients otherwise physiologically fit and active. This trend has led to an inevitable rise in complications such as periprosthetic femoral fracture. Periprosthetic femoral fracture can be challenging due to poor bone quality, osteoporosis, and stress fractures. We present a case of periprosthetic femoral fracture in a 71-year-old woman with some components of an atypical femoral fracture. The fracture was internally fixed but was subsequently complicated by infection, implant failure needing revision, and later stress fracture. She was on a bisphosphonate after her index total hip replacement surgery for an impending pathological left proximal femur fracture, and this may have caused the later stress fracture. Unfortunately, she then experienced implant breakage (nonunion), which was treated with a biplanar locking plate and bone grafting. The patient finally regained her premorbid mobility 13 months after the last surgery and progressed satisfactorily towards bony union.

Analysis of complications in 97 periprosthetic Vancouver B2 fractures treated either by internal fixation or revision arthroplasty

IntroductionThe treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures after hip arthroplasty is still a matter of debate. Revision Arthroplasty (RA) was long thought to be the treatment of choice, however several recent papers suggested that Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) is a viable option for selected B2 fractures. Complication rates of 14–26% have been reported following surgical treatment of B2 fractures. No significant difference between RA and ORIF in the complication rates nor in the functional outcome was observed.MethodWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 97 consecutive Vancouver B2 fractures treated according to the algorithm at our institution from 2007 to 2020 and recorded complications and patient specific data.ResultFrom the 97 patient, 45 fractures were treated with RA while 52 fractures were treated with ORIF. Thirteen patients in the RA group had a complication that needed revision (28%) and 11 patients in the ORIF group needed revision (21%). There was no significant difference between complication rates. The reason for failure in the 13 RA patients were infection (n = 4), stem subsidence (n = 1), refracture after a new fall (n = 3), secondary dislocation of the greater trochanter (n = 1) and dislocation (n = 4). The reason for failure in the 11 ORIF patients that were revised were infection (n = 5), persistent symptomatic stem loosening (n = 3) and refracture (n = 3) after a new fall.ConclusionORIF can be used to revise cemented and non-cemented shafts in more than half of Vancouver B2 fractures with no difference in complication rates when compared to RA. A periprosthetic fracture around the hip has a 21–28% risk of a re-operation after revision surgery with infection and re-fracture after a new fall being the most frequent cause of re-operation.

Treatment of Vancouver B2 Femur Fractures With Open Reduction Internal Fixation Versus Revision Arthroplasty.

Background Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures have traditionally been treated with revision arthroplasty.However, there is increasing evidence that open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) may be a valid alternative treatment strategy.The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ORIF versus revision arthroplasty for the treatment of Vancouver B2 fractures and evaluate the influence of the treating surgeon's fellowship training on treatment selection. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort study of 31 patients treated for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures (16 ORIF and 15 revision arthroplasty) at a single academic Level 1 trauma center. Outcome measures included one-year mortality, revision, reoperation, infection, and blood loss. Results There were no statistically significant differences in revision, reoperation, or infection at an average follow-up of 65 weeks.Median estimated blood loss was higher in the arthroplasty group (700 cc versus 400 cc; P = 0.04).There were five deaths in the ORIF group versus one in the revision group (P= 0.18). Cases treated by surgeons with fellowship training in arthroplasty were more likely to be treated with revision arthroplasty (10/11, 90.9%) than those treated by surgeons with fellowship training in trauma (5/15, 33.3%; P< 0.01). Conclusions There was no difference in outcomes between the two treatment strategies, but revision was associated with higher blood loss.The appropriate treatment method should be based on surgeon familiarity and patients'characteristics.

Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures

BackgroundTo compare outcomes of revision to a long uncemented stem with cement-in-cement revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture (PPF). MethodsPatients undergoing surgery for a Vancouver B2 PPF in a cemented stem from 2008 to 2018 were identified using our prospectively collated database. ResultsWe identified 43 uncemented and 29 cement-in-cement revisions. Cement-in-cement revision had a shorter operative time, reduction in certain complications, no increased rate of non-union, lower degree of stem subsidence and no difference in re-revision rate. ConclusionWith appropriate patient selection, both cement-in-cement and long uncemented stem revision represent appropriate treatment options for Vancouver B2 fractures.

No Learning Curve of the Direct Superior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

ObjectivesTo assess the learning curve of the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to compare surgical, clinical, and radiological results with a matched control group using the mini posterior approach (MPA).MethodsA prospective cohort study was performed from October 2016 to May 2017 including our first 52 patients undergoing THA using the DSA. Patients with primary osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis and a body mass index (BMI) < 35 who were eligible for surgery were included. As a control group, 52 patients who underwent the MPA were included, matched based on age, BMI, and ASA classification. In the DSA group, damage to the iliotibial tract and the distal external rotators, including the external obturator and quadriceps femoris muscles, was avoided. Outcome measures were collected, including surgical time, blood loss, postoperative pain, length of stay, implant position, use of walking aids, patient reported outcome measures (PROM), and complications. Unpaired t‐tests were used to analyze differences between the DSA and the MPA group in surgical time, blood loss, length of stay, and acetabular and femoral component position. χ2‐tests were used to analyze mobility and the number of complications. Two‐way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze pain scores and PROM between the DSA and the MPA groups.ResultsThe mean surgical time of 61 min (SD 8) in the DSA group was longer (P < 0.001) compared to that in the MPA group, 46 min (SD 12). No differences were found in blood loss, postoperative pain, or mean length of stay in the hospital. After 6 weeks, 94% of the patients in the DSA group were able to walk inside their home without walking aids compared to 90% in the MPA group. The mobility scores were not different after follow up of 6 weeks and 1 year (P = 0.12 and P = 0.36 respectively). All PROM improved postoperatively in both the DSA and the MPA group (P < 0.01). Acetabular cup and femoral stem position were not compromised by the DSA. Complications included two Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures in the DSA group, of which there was one surgical‐related fracture and one fracture after a traffic accident. Complications in the MPA group included one periprosthetic fracture, two hip dislocations, and one ischial neuropathy. No infections or thromboembolic events were observed. The 1‐year complication rate was not different between the MPA and DSA groups (P = 0.40).ConclusionThe DSA can be safely introduced as no learning curve in the prosthesis position or the complication rate was found.

Vancouver B2 Peri-Prosthetic Fractures in Cemented Femoral Implants can be Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Alone Without Revision

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of 52 consecutive Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures around cemented polished double-tapered stems treated by open reduction and internal fixation in 2 trauma centers in 2 countries. MethodsOutcomes included modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Harris Pain Score, and return to pre-injury mobility. Fracture healing was assessed; implant subsidence measured and complications including re-operations reported. ResultsNo patient was lost to follow-up. Median patient age at operation was 82 years (range 43-98); Harris pain scores showed minimal pain (median 42, range 10-44) at latest follow-up. Median total subsidence at 1 year was 1.1 mm (range 0-5.4), the majority of which occurred within the cement mantle. No subsequent femoral stem revision was required (median 2.9 years, 0-10); however, there were 3 re-operations: 1 re-operation for pre-existing recurrent dislocation involving head liner exchange and 2 for repeat fixation due to metal fatigue. Two additional fractures occurred below the new plating, requiring further plating whilst still retaining the original stems. ConclusionAnatomical reduction and open reduction and internal fixation of Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures should be considered as an appropriate treatment solution for frail elderly patients with a peri-prosthetic fracture around cemented polished double-tapered stems.

Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the radiologic outcomes of open reduction and lateral plating with wiring in the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures. MethodsWe retrospectively recruited 37 patients treated with ORIF with lateral plating and wiring for Vancouver B2 fractures. The 27 patients (15 men and 12 women; mean age: 70.8 ± 8.3 years) without follow-up loss had achieved complete bony union without notable complications. The average union period was checked after operation with radiologic findings. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated by ipsilateral limb length discrepancy (LLD) and subsidence between immediate postoperative length and length at postoperative 1 year after adjusting for magnification differences. The average distance to which the retained stem sunk down was investigated between immediate postoperative radiographs and final radiographs showing union. ResultsTen patients could not be evaluated, because of mortality or failure to follow up. The average time to union was 18.3 weeks, and the average distance of stem sinking was 2.5 ± 1.7 mm (range: 0–7.2 mm), which was significantly different between immediate postoperative radiographs and final radiographs. There was no case with loss of reduction or loss of fixation, requiring revision surgery. ConclusionOpen reduction and lateral plating with wiring as a treatment for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures produced good radiologic outcomes with successful bony union. ORIF can be considered the alternative option for treating patients with Vancouver B2 PPF, instead of stem revision surgery. Level of evidenceLevel IV, Therapeutic study.

The value of a standardized and reproducible surgical technique in treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures: our experience.

To retrospectively review results and complications of our standardized surgical technique addressed exclusively to Vancouver B2 fractures. From January 2006 to July 2016, we treated 235 consecutive patients, 47 males and 188 females, mean age at surgery of 71 ± 10 years, with periprosthetic B2 fractures. Exclusion criteria were other kind of periprosthetic fractures and other femoral fractures. The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically following our standard protocol at the last available follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 6.4years. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to Beals and Tower's criteria and clinical evaluation was performed using the Harris Hip Score and clinical exam. From the starter cohort of 235, 207 patients (88.1%) were fully evaluated, while 28 were lost to follow-up. According to Beal and Tower's criteria, we found excellent results in 72 patients (34.8%), good results in 133 patients (64.3%), and poor results in 2 patients (0.9%). Mean HHS was 75 ± 9 points, with a statistically significant correlation between good functional results and better radiographic assessment (p = 0.001). The use of support plate (p = 0.008) and the acetabular revision (p = 0.002) showed a statistically significant distribution with worse radiographic results. Late complications detected were ten dislocations. Our experience suggests that using a standardized and reproducible surgical technique, as our technique proposed, can surely reduce surgical time, the complication rate, and the mortality rate. During acetabular evaluation, the choice of performing a cup revision must be weighed on overall patient's assessment.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Charcot Arthropathy is Associated With High Complications but Improved Clinical Outcomes

BackgroundNeuropathic (Charcot) arthropathy of the hip is rare but can lead to joint destruction, bone loss, and dysfunction. While total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be considered a treatment option, only very limited data in the form of case reports are available on the results of THA. The goal of this study was to analyze the outcomes of primary THA for Charcot arthropathy with emphasis on implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes. MethodsEleven patients undergoing 12 primary THAs for Charcot arthropathy from 2007 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a severe underlying neuropathy and clear radiographic evidence of Charcot arthropathy. Mean age was 54 years with 4 patients being female. Mean follow-up was 5 years. ResultsSurvivorship free of any revision was 75% at both 2 and 5 years. Three THAs (3/12) were revised: 2 for recurrent instability and 1 for femoral component loosening. Survivorship free of any reoperation was 67% at both 2 and 5 years. One additional THA underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture. The overall complication rate (including revisions and reoperations) was high at 58% with 3 recurrent dislocations, 2 periprosthetic fractures, 1 femoral component loosening, and 1 delayed wound healing. Harris Hip Scores improved from a mean of 43 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively (P < .001). ConclusionIn this study, the largest to date, we found that patients undergoing primary THA for Charcot arthropathy have a significant improvement in clinical outcomes but that there was a high risk of early complications and revisions, mostly related to recurrent instability. Specific precautions to avoid early complications, namely utilization of components that provide robust fixation and strategies that provide enhanced hip stability, should be considered. Level of EvidenceLevel IV.

Double plating in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: A biomechanical study.

Periprosthetic hip fractures are an increasing problem in modern orthopedic and trauma surgery. Many options for the operative treatment are available to the surgeon ranging from modern variable angular systems to standard plates, screws, and cerclages. However, there is no gold standard and therefore, the aim of this study, was to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of double plating versus a lateral standard plate in a Vancouver B1 fracture model. Ten 4th generation composite femora were used to implant cementless total hip prosthesis and create Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures. Afterwards, the osteotomies were fixed using the locking compression plate in combination with the locking attachment plate (LCP, LAP, DePuy Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland)-group I. Group II additionally achieved a 5-hole 4.5/5.0 mm LCP anteriorly. Each construct was cyclically loaded to failure in axial compression. Axial construct stiffness was 50.87 N/mm (SD 1.61) for group I compared to 738.68 N/mm (SD 94.8) for group II, this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.016). The number of cycles to failure was also significant higher for group II (2,375 vs. 13,000 cycles; p = 0.016). Double plating can significantly increase construct stiffness and stability, and thus, is an option in the treatment of complex periprosthetic fractures, in revision surgery and for patients with the inability to partial weight bear. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:234-239, 2017.

Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

Usefulness of Histology for Predicting Infection at the Time of Hip Revision for the Treatment of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Fractures

When facing a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture, the most recommended treatment is the prosthesis replacement. Current tests do not provide enough reliability to identify whether the fracture has been produced on a septic or an aseptic loosened prosthesis. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the histology for the diagnosis of infection in these cases. A total of 11 hip revision procedures were performed (mean age: 78.1 years, 8 women and 3 men). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the histology were 100%, 55.5%, 33.3% and 100% respectively. Of the six patients presenting with a positive histology, four of them had negative cultures (66.6% of false positives). Our results suggest that periprosthetic fractures are a cause of false-positive histology results for the diagnosis of infection during revision of a hip prosthesis for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

The use of an interference fit retrograde nail as an adjunct to plate fixation of a complex Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture

As the number of hip arthroplasties performed continues to grow, increasingly complex periprosthetic fractures are encountered. In particular, fractures occurring near the tip of a well-fixed stem, classified as Vancouver B1, have been associated with high rates of failure. Numerous treatment strategies have been recommended including traditional plating, locked plating, cortical allografts as well as retrograde nails overlapping the femoral stem tip. The latter technique has been advocated as a less invasive method to stabilise periprosthetic fractures in elderly, lowdemand patients unfit for extensive surgical procedures. Here, we present the use of a retrograde nail overlapping a femoral stem in a young, active patient as supplemental fixation to a lateral plate for the difficult situation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture proximal to an femoral shaft hypertrophic nonunion.

DSA Observation of Hemodynamic Response of Femoral Head With Femoral Neck Fracture During Traction

Periprosthetic fracture and infection are dreaded complications after total hip arthroplasty. We present the case of a 50-year-old man who suffered an early postoperative Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture, which was further complicated by concurrent infection after open reduction and internal fixation. We report the novel use of an antibiotic-impregnated cement coated locking plate during the staged treatment of concomitant periprosthetic fracture and chronic total hip arthroplasty infection. At 1-year follow-up, the patient is pain free and ambulating independently with full range of motion.

Finite element analysis of different repair methods of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty

ObjectiveTo use finite element analysis to study the stability of different fixation methods used to repair Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures occurring after total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsAn artificial femur was used as the basis for the solid model; U2 series femoral stem (United Orthopedic Corporation, Hsinchu, Taiwan) was used for modelling of the prosthesis; and the modelling of the cable plate, wires and screws was based on information given in the manufacturer's catalogue (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA). The analysis model was constructed using the ANSYS software, and all material settings were based on literature values. A six-orifice cable plate, unicortical screws (20mm long and 4.5mm in diameter) and bicortical screws (50mm long and 4.5mm in diameter) were constructed. Four analysis models were defined. The basic model had a plate and three cable wires above the fracture line and two bicortical screws below the fracture line. In the second model, two unicortical screws were added above the fracture line. In the third model, three wires were added below the fracture line. In the fourth model, both the proximal screws of the second model and the distal wires of the third model were added to the basic model. To ensure that the numerical values produced by analysis reached convergence, mesh convergence was tested. ResultsAdding two proximal unicortical screws to the basic Ogden construct (plate, proximal wires and distal screws) lessened displacement of the fracture and decreased the von Mises stress on the repair. Adding three distal wires to the basic construct had no noticeable effect. ConclusionBetter fixation power is achieved by using both proximal and distal screws (the locking-plate concept) in treating Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture after THA.

Intraprosthetic fixation techniques in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures-A biomechanical study

To develop new fixation techniques for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures using intraprosthetic screw fixation with inserted threaded liners. A Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture was simulated in femur prosthesis constructs using sawbones and cemented regular straight hip stems. Fixation was then performed with either unicortical locked-screw plating using the less invasive stabilization system-plate or with intraprosthetic screw fixation using inserted liners. Two experimental groups were formed using either prostheses made of titanium alloy or prostheses made of cobalt chrome alloy. Fixation stability was compared in an axial load-to-failure model. Drilling was performed using a specially invented prosthesis drill with constantly applied internal cooling. The intraprosthetic fixation model with titanium prostheses was superior to the unicortical locked-screw fixation in all tested devices. The intraprosthetic fixation model required 10 456 N ± 1892 N for failure and the unicortical locked-screw plating required 7649 N ± 653 N (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the second experimental group and the control group. Intraprosthetic screw anchorage with special threaded liners enhances the primary stability in treating periprosthetic fractures by internal fixation.

Intermediate outcomes of alumina-on-alumina bearing total hip arthroplasty

To explore the intermediate outcomes of third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty (THA). A consecutive series of 165 primary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties were performed in 135 patients. Three patients died and 13 patients lost follow-up so that a total of 119 patients (146 hips) were available for study. The mean patient age was 53.4 ± 11.0 years old (range: 26 - 79). Hydroxyapatite. (HA)-coated press-fit acetabular cups were used in all cases. At femoral side, 123 cases were implanted with HA-coated uncemented stems and 23 cases implanted with high polished double taped cemented stems. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically after a minimal follow-up duration of 60 months. The preoperative mean Harris hip score of 49.6 ± 7.9 points improved to 91.7 ± 3.0 points at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The 5-year survival for any reason lead to revision was 96.6%. Five hips were under revision, 1 for acetabular shell loosening and migration, 1 for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture, 1 for fracture of pure alumina liner and 2 for infections. All other prostheses demonstrated no radiographic evidence of loosening. No periprosthetic osteolysis was found. There were 2 cases of dislocations and 2 patients presented postoperatively with "squeaking-like" hips. The clinical and radiographic outcomes after primary THA with third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces are favorable after a minimal follow-up duration of 5 years. The modified alumina-on-alumina bearing implants offer a better option for younger and active patients.

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones

IntroductionThe introduction of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis techniques has provided us a further means to treat periprosthetic femoral fractures. The goal of this experimental study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties and stability of treated periprosthetic fractures when using two different plate systems, which vary in the locking mechanism and the screw placement (monocortical or bicortical) with respect to the prosthesis stem. Materials and methodsUsing five pairs of formalin-fixed femora, a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture was treated either with a 13-hole LISS® titanium plate using four monocortical periprosthetic screws or with a non-contact bridging plate (NCB) DF® plate using bicortical angle-stable blocked screws positioned ventrally or dorsally to the prosthesis stem. Bones were loaded under axial and cyclic compression with a progressively increased load until failure. Displacement at the osteotomy gap was measured during loading using an ultra-sound measuring system. ResultsThe mean displacement in the region of the fracture gap was not significantly different at any time during the experiments for the two models. The mean force resulting in subsequent model failure was similar in both models; the failure morphology varied slightly between the models, however. Four of the five LISS® models exhibited either a tear-out of the monocortical screws or a decortication from the bony shaft of the cortical lamella surrounding the screws. On the other side, two of the NCB models showed macroscopically visible fissures along the osteosynthesis plates at the height of the osteotomy gap, and were hence considered implant failures. Only one NCB model showed tear-out of the bicortically placed screws. ConclusionBicortical screw placement provides more stable anchoring when compared to monocortical screw fixation. However, in relation to the amount of motion at the osteotomy gap and to failure loads, stabilisation of periprosthetic femoral fractures can be equally well achieved using either the LISS® plate with periprosthetic monocortical screws or the NCB plate with poly-axially placed bicortical screws.

Cement-in-Cement Femoral Revision for the Treatment of Highly Selected Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Fractures

The use of the cement-in-cement technique for femoral component revisions has been well described. The application of this technique in the management of selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures, after careful preoperative and intraoperative evaluation, offers a novel alternative that is rapid and technically less demanding, with resulting decreased blood loss and decreased risk of iatrogenic fragmentation of bone during cement removal.