Valve Replacement In Octogenarians Research Articles

E-1 | Five-year Survival Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarian with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Analysis

E-1 | Five-year Survival Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarian with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Analysis

Surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: Single-center perioperative outcomes and five-year survival

Introduction and objectivesAortic stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease. The number of octogenarians proposed for intervention is growing due to increased lifespan. In this manuscript we aim to evaluate perioperative outcome and long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in octogenarians, comparing patients with low surgical risk (EuroscoreII <4%) with intermediate-high risk (EuroscoreII ≥4%). MethodsA retrospective observational single-center cohort study with 195 patients aged ≥80 years old, who underwent SAVR between 2017 and 2021, was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to EuroscoreII: (1) Low risk (EuroscoreII <4%) with intermediate-high risk (EuroscoreII ≥4%). Continuous variables are presented in median (IQR), analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum test; categorical variables in percentages, analyzed using chi-squared test; and survival was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier, open cohort, and the log-rank test was performed. ResultsThe overall median age was 82 (IQR 81–83), with 4.6% of the patients ≥85 years old. 23.6% of the patients presented EuroscoreII ≥4%. No complications were observed in 26.2%, with a significantly higher rate in intermediate-high risk patients. Postoperative need for hemodynamic support was the most frequent complication, followed by postoperative acute kidney injury and the use of blood products. Overall median ICU stay was three days (2–4) and hospital length of stay (LOS) six days (5–8). Patients with intermediate-high risk and those with complications had longer ICU LOS. At 12 months, overall survival was 96.4%, at three years 94.1% and 5 years 75.4%. Patients with low surgical risk had higher survival proportions up to 5 years. ConclusionSAVR in patients ≥80 years is associated with low in-hospital mortality, although a significant proportion of patients develop complications. Long-term follow-up up to five years after surgery is acceptable in octogenarians with low surgical risk.

Similar clinical outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with aortic stenosis.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the preferred treatment option for severe aortic stenosis in the elderly and in patients with comorbidities. We sought to compare outcomes after TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in octogenarians. In this retrospective cohort study conducted at our tertiary center, clinical data were gathered before and after TAVI and SAVR procedures performed from January 2013 to May 2019; follow-up completed in March 2021. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Patients were stratified according to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and procedure type. Propensity score-based matching was also performed. Of 542 patients who matched the inclusion criteria, 273 underwent TAVI and 269 SAVR. TAVI patients were older (85.8 ± 3.0 vs. 82.2 ± 2.2 years; P < 0.001) and had a higher mean STS score (5.0 ± 4.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3; P < 0.001) and EuroSCORE II (5.3 ± 4.1 vs. 2.8 ± 6.0; P < 0.001). Rates of postoperative permanent pacemaker insertion (15.0% vs. 9.3%; P = 0.040) and paravalvular leak (9.9% vs. 0.8%; P < 0.001) were higher and acute kidney injury lower (8.8% vs. 32.7%; P < 0.001) after TAVI, with no difference between treatment groups for major bleeding (11.0% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.130) or 30-day mortality (5.5% vs. 3.7%; P = 0.315). A statistically significant difference was found between TAVI and SAVR in low- and intermediate-risk groups when it came to occurrence of paravalvular leak, acute kidney injury, and new onset AF (all P < 0.001). This analysis of an octogenarian "real-life" population undergoing TAVI or SAVR (with a biological valve) showed similar outcomes regarding clinical endpoints in low- and medium-risk (STS score) groups.

Predictors of short and long-term mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement in 681 octogenarians: a monocentric experience

Abstract Introduction In spite of potential frailty, very elderly patients are increasingly referred for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), even after the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Purpose What are the predictors for short and long-term mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians and are these avoidable? Patients and methods This is a retrospective file study of 861 octogenarians, who underwent SAVR with or without associated procedures between 1987 to 2017. Mechanical valves and valves in another position were excluded. Age, gender, cardiac and non-cardiac comorbid conditions (renal, pulmonary, diabetes, malignancy), operative data (cross-clamp and bypass time, associated procedures) and postoperative adverse events were investigated for their effect on 30-day and on long-time mortality. Significant factors in an univariate analysis (chi-square and Kaplan-Meier) were entered in a multivariate model (logistic regression, Cox' proportional hazard analysis). Results Hospital mortality was 68/681 (10%). The follow-up was 3817 years, with a mean of 6.2 years for the remaining 613 patients. Predictors (Odds Ratio, p-value) for hospital mortality are: – Need for SAVR &amp;lt;24h, 3.87 (p=0.001) – Pulmonary disease, 2.44 (p=0.002) – Atrial fibrillation, 2.30 (p=0.004) – Age &amp;gt;85 years, 2.02 (p=0.021) – Renal disease, 1.94 (p=0.025) – Coronary artery disease, 1.99 (p=0.046) Five-year survival is 66.4±1.9% (392 patients at risk); ten-year survival is 25.3±2.0 (89 patients at risk), 15-year survival is 4.0±1.3% (6 patients at risk). Its predictors (Odds Ratio, p-value) are: – Renal disease, 1.40 (p=0.005) – Congestive heart failure, 1.37 (p=0.006) – Postoperative Low Cardiac Output Syndrome, 1.82 (p=0.007) – Postoperative delirium, 1.45 (p=0.010) – Postoperative ventricular arrhythmia 1.84, (p=0.014) – Need for SAVR &amp;lt;24 h, 1.69 (p=0.021) – Diabetes mellitus, 1.30 (p=0.032) – Malignancy, 1.30 (p=0.046) – Pulmonary disease, 1.26 (p=0.047) – Preoperative carotid artery endarterectomy, 1.49 (p=0.052) Conclusions In this elderly population, short and long-term mortality are acceptable. The need for urgent SAVR (&amp;lt;24h) is the dominant predictor for 30-day mortality. Of the ten predictors for long-term survival, seven are of preoperative nature. Two postoperative cardiac events as well as need for urgent SAVR have an important effect on long-term outcome. No operative variables were identified as predictor. Need for urgent SAVR should be avoided by early referral. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Re‐sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in octogenarian patients in age of evolving transcatheter therapies

The aim of this study was to analyze perioperative results and long-term survival of re-sternotomy for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in octogenarians in age of transcatheter therapies. This is a retrospective, single-center study (April 2000 to December 2019). Perioperative data were compared for re-sternotomy with isolated SAVR (Isolated redoSAVR) and re-sternotomy with SAVR and concomitant cardiac procedure (Associated redoSAVR). Regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of in-patient mortality. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared for groups. There were 163 patients (Isolated redoSAVR; 69, Associated redoSAVR; 94). Emergency/salvage cases were excluded. The median age was 83 (81-85) years and the median logEuroSCORE was 19.2 (13.0-26.7)%. The follow-up was 4.2 ± 3.5 years. Inpatient mortality was 4.9% (1.4% vs. 7.4% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR respectively, p = .08). TIA/stroke rate was 8% (9% vs. 7% for Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR, respectively, p = .78). COPD was a predictor of inpatient mortality (odds ratio:8.86; 95% confidence interval:1.19-66.11, p = .03).Survival was 88.7%, 86.4%, 70.1%, 49.5%, and 26.3% at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years. There was no survival difference between Isolated redoSAVR and Associated redoSAVR (log rank p = .36, Wilcoxon p = .84).Significant adverse predictors of long-term survival were COPD, postoperative TIA/stroke, and length of stay. Survival was lower than age and gender-matched first-time SAVR and general population of the United Kingdom. RedoSAVR in octogenarians is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Shared decision-making should consider emerging transcatheter therapies as a valuable option in selected patients.

Contemporary outcomes of mitral valve replacement in octogenarians

We aimed to determine the outcomes of contemporary mitral valve replacement (MVR) in octogenarians, for rational treatment selection in a patient cohort. Between 2007 and 2018, 656 consecutive MVRs were performed. Among these cases, 109 patients were aged 80 years or older, and 547 patients were younger than 80 years. Isolated MVRs were performed in 211 patients, of whom 36 were aged 80 years or older. Perioperative mortality and complications were compared between the two groups, adjusted by propensity score. In-hospital mortality of the entire MVR (<80: 26 [4.8%] vs. ≥80: 6 [5.5%], p = .81) and isolated MVR (<80: 6 [3.4%] vs. ≥80: 1 [2.8%], p > .99) groups were similar. Age >80 years did not influence in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-3.14, p = .9), stroke (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.19-6.71, p = .9), hemodialysis (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.45-4.66, p = .54), or prolonged ventilation (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.81-3.23, p = .18), but influenced the incidence of reopening for bleeding (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.11-14.19, p = .03). Cox proportional hazard model results showed that age >80 years did not affect cardiac death (HR, 1.45, 95% CI: 0.67-3.12, p = .35), bleeding events (HR, 1.89, 95% CI: 0.84-4.27, p = .13), or stroke (HR, 1.51, 95% CI: 0.54-4.21, p = .44) during the follow-up period. The perioperative and follow-up outcomes of MVR in octogenarians were not inferior to those of younger patients. We should not hesitate to conduct MVR on the grounds of old age.

Cost analysis of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: analysis from a single Japanese center.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the prognosis of intermediate- or high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, particularly among older adults. However, in possible candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), the implantation of expensive prostheses may be questionable in an era when healthcare costs are becoming a major concern. In this retrospective analysis of a single Japanese center, we focused on patients aged over 80years; the objectives of this study were: (1) to compare TAVR and SAVR in terms of total hospitalization costs and (2) to describe the itemized cost of TAVR and SAVR to identify patients aged over 80years in whom TAVR or SAVR would be cost-effective. A total of 146 patients aged over 80years who underwent TAVR or SAVR for severe aortic stenosis were included. These patients were divided into a high-risk group (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] mortality score > 8%; 36: TAVR and 12: SAVR) with 48 patients and a non-high-risk group (STS mortality score < 8%; 45: TAVR and 53 SAVR) with 98 patients. No 30-day mortality was observed in either group. In both groups, postoperative intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were longer with SAVR than with TAVR. In the non-high-risk group, the total cost was comparable for TAVR and SAVR; however, in the high-risk group, the total cost was significantly higher with SAVR than that with TAVR. A breakdown analysis of the total cost in the high-risk group showed both pre- and postoperative costs to be significantly higher with SAVR than with TAVR; however, operative costs were higher with TAVR. Up to 3years, the overall survival in both groups did not significantly differ between TAVR and SAVR. Our findings suggest that from the perspective of total medical costs, TAVR is more suitable than SAVR for high-risk older adults.

Clinical impact of the heart team on the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement among octogenarians.

The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary heart team in the management of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is unknown. This study evaluated the impact of a heart team on the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians. Between May 2007 and January 2016, 528 patients aged 80years or more were referred to our institutional heart team for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Among these, 101 were redirected to surgical aortic valve replacement (heart team group). These patients were compared with a surgical aortic valve replacement cohort (n=506) without prior heart team screening (non-heart team group), taken from the same time period. Propensity score matching with bootstrap analysis was performed; 76 heart team patients were matched to 76 non-heart team patients. Early and late outcomes including survival and readmission for cardiovascular causes were compared. Matched subgroups were largely comparable; congestive heart failure and echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension were more prevalent in the heart team group. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the matched heart team group (0% vs 6.0%, bootstrap mean difference 6.0%, 95% confidence interval, 2.2-9.8). The risk of stroke, low cardiac output state, reexploration for bleeding, pneumonia, and prolonged ventilation was also significantly lower in the heart team group. There was no significant between-group difference regarding late survival (hazard ratio, 0.86, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.33, P=.49) or readmission for cardiovascular reasons (hazard ratio, 0.70, 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.20, P=.19). Preoperative multidisciplinary assessment of octogenarians by a heart team was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and adverse events after surgical aortic valve replacement.

Quality of life following aortic valve replacement in octogenarians

Quality of life following aortic valve replacement in octogenarians

In-Hospital Outcomes After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians.

BackgroundOctogenarians have low physiologic reserve and may benefit more from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).Methods and ResultsThis retrospective cohort study based on the National Inpatient Sample included octogenarians who underwent TAVR or SAVR from 2012 to 2015. Crude and standardized‐morbidity‐ratio‐weighted regression models were used to compare in‐hospital outcomes. Among 19 145 TAVR and 9815 SAVR hospitalizations, TAVR patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores (2.0 versus 0.8, P<0.0001) than SAVR patients. Before weighting, TAVR was associated with significantly shorter length of stay, more home discharges, and lower incidences of acute kidney injury, bleeding, and cardiogenic shock. Associations were consistent across Charlson Comorbidity Index, except for TAVR being associated with greater length of stay reductions among patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, compared with Charlson Comorbidity Index <2 (change in estimate −3.56 versus −2.61 days, P=0.004). After weighting, TAVR patients had significantly shorter length of stay (change in estimate −3.29 days, 95% CI −3.82, −2.75) and lower odds of transfer to skilled nursing facility (odds ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.29, 0.41), acute kidney injury (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.45, 0.68), bleeding (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.37, 0.53), and cardiogenic shock (odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.33, 0.92), compared with SAVR patients. Odds of permanent pacemaker implantation, transient ischemic attack/stroke, vascular complications, and in‐hospital mortality were not significantly different.Conclusions TAVR may be preferred over SAVR in high‐risk octogenarians because of shorter length of stay, better discharge disposition, and less acute kidney injury, and bleeding. All octogenarians may benefit more from TAVR, irrespective of comorbidity burden, but additional research is needed to confirm our findings.

Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians: The Influence of Coronary Artery Disease.

We sought to determine the long-term results of stentless biological heart valve replacement in octogenarians to find out whether coronary artery disease or the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedure itself influences survival in these aged patients. From 4,012 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a stentless prosthesis (Freestyle, Medtronic) at a single center, 721 patients were older than 80 years. They had a mean age of 83 ± 2 (2,320 patient years), the male/female ratio was 42:58, NYHA (New York Heart Association) class I and II was prevalent in 22.8%, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in 20.6%, coronary artery disease in 56.1%, mitral valve disease in 12.5%, and aortic disease in 3.5%. Follow-up included a total of 11,546 patient years (mean follow-up time: 74 ± 53 months); follow-up mortality data were 96.3% complete. In these aged patients, 30-day mortality in the isolated AVR group (10.3%) was similar to that in the AVR + CABG group (13.4%). Although long-term survival (15 years) in the octogenarian population is low (9% in the AVR group and 6% in the AVR + CABG group), it was not different (p = 0.191) between patients with and without coronary artery disease. The stroke rate and the myocardial infarction rate, respectively, in the AVR + CABG group (0.43%/100 patient years and 0.17%/100 patient years) were only insignificantly higher than that in the isolated AVR group (each 0.01%/100 patient years). The actuarial freedom from reoperation was 99% in both the groups. Use of the Freestyle stentless valve prosthesis for AVR is feasible also in octogenarians. The existence of coronary artery disease leads to concomitant bypass surgery, but not a higher level of perioperative or long-term mortality.

Early Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians

Early Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians

Survival and quality of life after surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.

BackgroundIn patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, advanced age is often a reason for a transcatheter rather than surgical aortic valve replacement. In this pre-transcathter cohort we had the unique oportunity to study outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in patients who might currently be triaged to a percutaneous approach.MethodsIn a prospective single-center cohort study we compared the incidence of peri-operative complications, mortality, and health-related quality of life in octogenarians versus patients aged <80 years. The quality of life was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire and expressed as a physical and mental component score (PCS and MCS respectively); a score of 50 equals the average score in the age-matched general population. The association between age and the component scores at one-year follow-up was studied with the use of linear regression, corrected for a set of confounding variables.ResultsWe included 762 patients, of whom 21.4 % was aged >80 and 49.0 % underwent concomitant revascularization. In octogenarians, the incidence of post-operative delirium was 11.0 %, which was higher than in patients aged below 80 (6.2 %, p = 0.034); the operative mortality (1.9 % vs. 2.9 %; p = 0.59) and long-term survival were not different however (log-rank p = 0.75). In octogenarians, the quality of life was impaired 30-days after surgery (PCS 45.01, p <0.001; MCS 48.21, p = 0.04), which improved towards or above normal values at one-year follow-up (PCS: 49.92, p = 0.67, MCS: 52.55, p < 0.001). After correction for confounding, age was not significantly associated with the one-year PCS (β 0.08 per year, p = 0.34) or MCS (β 0.08 per year, p = 0.32).ConclusionsThis pre-transcatheter study showed that surgical aortic valve replacement in octogenarians could be performed with very low mortality, and with a relevant and significant increase of the quality of life towards normal values. Also, age was not associated with a lower PCS or MCS one-year after surgery.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13019-016-0432-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement in octogenarians - review of long-term outcomes in the past two decades

During the past decades, the cardiovascular community was faced with an ageing patient population and thus with an increased number of elderly patients referred for cardiac surgery. This is also perceptible for mitral valve (MV) disease, as gold standard treatment is MV-repair or replacement. Satisfactory results were proven in octogenarians, but comparative data of both treatments is scarce.

Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians with Three Different Rapid Deployment/ Sutureless Valves

Methods: Between 4/2007 and 1/2014, isolated AVR were performed with rapid deployment/ sutureless valves in 60 octogenarians patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (Age: 82.73 ± 2.51 years, female: n = 52) at our center. Three different types of rapid deployment / sutureless valves were used (Sorin Perceval (n = 40), Edwards Intuity (n = 17), Medtronic Enable (n = 3)).

Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians With Prior Cardiac Surgery

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been advocated for very elderly patients with aortic stenosis, and prior cardiac surgery as a less invasive treatment option. Although surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is safe and effective in selected elderly patients, the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of AVR in very elderly with prior cardiac surgery are unknown. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database at our center enrolled 3,735 patients after AVR since 1997. In this time interval, we identified 61 patients 80 years and older who underwent AVR for severe AS or failed aortic bioprosthesis after having prior cardiac surgery. All clinical parameters were derived from the STS database. Follow-up mortality was assessed using the Social Security Death Index. The average age of the patients was 83 ± 2 years, 77% were male, and 75% underwent an isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) as their first cardiac procedure. The mean ejection fraction was 0.53 ± 0.13. The CABG was performed concurrently in 49% of patients at the time of redo sternotomy and AVR. Stented bioprosthesis was implanted in 61% of patients and stentless in 39%. Perioperative mortality was 1.6% (1 of 61). One, 3, 5, and 7 year survival rates were 85%, 69%, 63%, and 43%, respectively. Patients with AVR only had similar survival to patients who underwent concomitant AVR and CABG. Type of aortic prosthesis did not influence postoperative survival. In selected patients over the age of 80 with history of prior cardiac surgery, AVR can be performed safely with very good mid-term outcomes. Age alone should not be exclusion criteria for surgical AVR in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery.

Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians

With improved life expectancy more octogenarians now present with aortic valve disease. Cardiac surgery in this group of patients has previously been considered high risk due to co-morbidities and challenges of rehabilitation. This study seeks to challenge the concept of octogenarian cardiac surgery "unsuitability" by analysing operative outcomes and long term survival following aortic valve replacement. Eighty-seven consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 2000 and 2009 at St Vincent's Hospital were retrospectively identified. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 15 and 19). The average age was 82.7 ± 2.4 years. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 18.86 ± 14.11. Post-operatively, four patients required insertion of a permanent pacemaker (4.6%) and five patients had a myocardial infarction (5.8%). In-hospital mortality was 3.4%. Follow-up was 93.1% complete. One-year survival was 92.9%, three-year survival was 86.7% and five-year survival was 75.0%. At follow-up 98.1% of patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I or II. Results were excellent despite reasonable co-morbidities and Euroscore risk. Survival was impressive and the NYHA class reflected the success of the surgery in relieving the pathological aortic valve process. Patient age should not be the primary exclusion for cardiac surgery for aortic valve disease.

Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarian

Aim: This study analyzes the long-term outcomes of mechanical aortic valve replacement in octogenarian patients. Material and Method: A retrospective review was performed on 23 octogenarian patients who underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement. Hospital mortality, postoperative intensive care unit stay, hospital stay and long-term results was examined. Estimates of the cumulative event mortality rate were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The mean age of all patients was 82.9±2.3 years and most were men (65.22%). The median ejection fraction was 45%. 73.91% of patients were in New York Heart Association class III-IV. Thirteen patients (56.52%) in this study underwent combined procedure, the remaining 10 (43.48%) patients underwent isolated aortic valve replacement. The most common valve size was 23 mm. The mean intensive care unit stay was 1.76±1.14 days. The mean hospital stay was 9.33±5.06 days. No complications were observed in 56.52% patients during their hospital stay. The overall hospital mortality was 8.7%. Follow-up was completed for all 23 patients. Median follow-up time was 33 months (1-108 months). Actuarial survival among discharged from hospital was 59% at 5 years. Discussion: Mechanical aortic valve replacement is a safe procedure in octogenarian patients and can be performed safely even in combined procedure.

Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians—minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement

Reoperative aortic valve replacement (re-AVR) in octogenarians is considered high risk and therefore might be indicated for transcatheter AVR. The minimally invasive technique for re-AVR limits dissection and might benefit this patient population. We report the outcomes of re-AVR in high-risk octogenarians who might be considered candidates for transcatheter AVR to assess the safety of re-AVR and minimally invasive operative techniques. We identified 105 patients, aged ≥80 years, who underwent open re-AVR at our institution from July 1997 to December 2011. Patients requiring concomitant coronary bypass surgery and/or other valve surgery were excluded. The outcomes of interest included operative mortality, postoperative complications, and midterm postoperative survival. Of the 105 patients, 51 underwent minimally re-AVR through upper hemisternotomy (Mre-AVR) and 54 standard full sternotomy (Fre-AVR). The mean patient age was 82.8 ± 3.8 years. No significant differences were found in the patient risk factors. Postoperatively, 6 patients (5.7%) underwent reoperation for bleeding, 4 (3.8%) experienced permanent stroke, 4 (3.8%) developed new renal failure, and 22 (21.0%) had new-onset atrial fibrillation. Overall, the operative mortality was 6.7%, and the 1- and 5-year survival was 87% and 53%, respectively. When Mre-AVR and Fre-AVR were compared, the operative mortality was 9.2% in the Fre-AVR group and 3.9% in the Mre-AVR group (P=.438). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a survival benefit at both 1 year (79% ± 11.7% vs 92% ± 7.8%) and 5 years (38% ± 17.6% vs 65% ± 15.7%, P=.028) favoring Mre-AVR. Cox regression analysis identified heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, reoperation for bleeding, older age, full sternotomy, and an infectious complication as predictors of mortality. Octogenarians who undergo re-AVR are thought to be high-risk surgical candidates. The present single-center series revealed acceptable in-hospital outcomes and operative mortality. Mre-AVR was associated with better survival compared with Fre-AVR and might benefit this population.

Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians Before and After the Introduction of Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) became available at Auckland City Hospital in 2011 for patients with severe aortic stenosis in whom surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) was deemed at high risk. We assessed whether introduction of TAVI affected the characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians undergoing AVR. Isolated AVR performed in patients ≥80 years of age during 2008-2012 were divided into two groups, pre- and post-TAVI introduction, for analyses. Isolated AVR was undertaken in 35 and 33 octogenarians pre- and post-TAVI introduction. The post-TAVI group were older (84.2 vs 82.3 years, P=0.003), had lower ejection fraction (P=0.026), more had inpatient surgery (76% vs 29%, P<0.001), with higher EuroSCORE II (5.4 vs 3.9%, P=0.033). Operative mortality was 0.0% in both groups. One-year survival was similar (97.6% vs 94.3%, P=0.613), but composite morbidity was lower in the post-TAVI group (9.1% vs 31.4%, P=0.035). Chronic respiratory disease (P=0.043) independently predicted mortality during follow-up, while number of coronary vessel>50% stenosis (P=0.050), creatinine clearance (P=0.016) and being in the pre-TAVI era group (P=0.022) predicted composite morbidity. Since TAVI was introduced, mean age and risk scores significantly increased in octogenarians undergoing AVR, while mortality rates remained similar and composite morbidity decreased.