Valuation Of Financial Instruments Research Articles

ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНО-МЕТОДИЧНЕ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ АУДИТУ БЕЗПЕРЕРВНОСТІ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ

The article is concerned with disclosing the theoretical, organisational foundations and methods of continuity audit based on analytical procedures. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the theoretical, organisational and methodological foundations of the going concern audit of enterprises under conditions of uncertainty. Object of research - organisational and methodological support for the audit of business continuity of enterprises. Methods used in the study: scientific cognition, method of generalisation, comparison, logical and substantive, methods of induction and deduction, analysis. The main hypothesis is the development of organisational and methodological foundations of the going concern audit based on the expansion of analytical procedures to meet the information needs of stakeholders about the status and potential of the financial viability of the enterprise's going concern under conditions of uncertainty. Summary of the main material. Under martial law, the importance of the continuity audit as a tool for protecting the interests of users of financial statements and ensuring that stakeholders are aware of the state of financial solvency and prospects for sustainable development of enterprises increases. Organisational and methodological support of the continuity audit is determined by the objectives of the audit and the needs of stakeholders to obtain reliable information on the assessment of financial viability to ensure continuing operations in the future. The proposed methodology for auditing the going concern of enterprises based on analytical procedures provides a holistic view of the organisation of the audit by the following stages: 1) analysis of liquidity and solvency of enterprises; 2) analysis of profitability potential; 3) analysis of financial stability; 4) analysis of risks of activity; 4) analysis of the potential of continuous activity of the enterprise. Particular attention in the process of a going concern audit is paid to the classification and analysis of business risks. Analytical procedures for assessing business risks, determining reserves to cover losses of economic benefits in relation to the risks of non-payment of receivables and reduction in the value of financial instruments have been substantiated. The methodology for auditing the going concern of enterprises based on the expansion of analytical procedures, the implementation of which provides an opportunity to generate high-quality information to assess the potential of the enterprise's going concern, taking into account the risk and prepare a reasonable audit opinion, is original and of practical importance. Conclusions. The implementation of scientific and methodological recommendations on the organisation and methodology of the continuity audit based on the expansion of analytical procedures will help to obtain sufficient evidence for a realistic assessment of the potential of financial solvency of enterprises, preparation of the audit opinion on compliance with the principle of continuity and improve the quality of the audit.

IMPROVEMENT OF METHODOLOGICAL PROVISION OF ECONOMIC EXPERTISE OF ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES REGARDING FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The article is devoted to the generalization of approaches and key aspects of economic expertise of accounting, assessment and taxation of transactions with financial instruments. Based on expert practice, the questions that are most often put before experts by the bodies of preliminary investigation and the court during the investigation are summarized, and the methodology for solving questions of the correctness of financial instruments in the accounting by economic expertise is summarized. Methodical approaches to the economic expertise of accounting issues and valuation of financial instruments have been determined, including identification and generalization of typical offences, standardization of the tools for checking the reliability of accounting data, and methods of expert verification of indicators of the fair value of financial instruments in accounting. The peculiarities of the application of the specified methods in the practice of expert activity have been revealed, which will allow optimizing expert research and contribute to strengthening the reliability of the cost presentation of financial instruments in reporting. The methods for resolving the issues of the correctness of reflection in the accounting of financial instruments by forensic economic expertise were developed to cover and disclose the key aspects of the expertise of accounting, valuation, and taxation of transactions with financial instruments. It presents methodical approaches to the forensic economic expertise of accounting and valuation of financial instruments, including identification and generalization of typical offences, standardization of tools for verifying the accuracy of accounting data, and methods of expert verification of the fair value of financial instruments in accounting. Its application in the practice of expert activities will optimize expert research in this area and will help strengthen the reliability of the value of financial instruments in the reporting.

Do Financial Markets Price Risks to Climate Change?

Financial markets represent a powerful means to incentivize governments and corporates to take action against climate change. When climatic risks are reflected in the valuation of financial instruments, firms and governments acting in their own self-interest will reorient decisions toward climate-friendly activities. While the literature has found scant evidence that climate change risks are priced into equity share prices, recent work suggests that climate risks are priced into sovereign bonds. I re-examine the link between climate change and sovereign bonds and find that, as with share prices, sovereign bonds do not price in a climate risk premium. This paper thus resolves the anomalous finding that investors would demand a climate risk premium from sovereign bonds but not stocks. I find that, by virtue of their construction, measures of climate change vulnerability and resilience are highly rigid over time, and thus empirically capture country-specific risk premia rather than a climate-specific risk premium.

PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT IN ACCOUNTING: CONTENTS AND CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION

The article considers the theoretical prerequisites and regulatory requirements that determine the practical approaches to the application of professional judgment in defining the best way to present reporting information. In the course of the research, the authors took as a basis the regulatory documents on the preparation of financial and integrated reporting, which take a principles-based approach and provide for the use of professional judgment. The authors assumed that the objects of a professional accountant are the facts of economic activity in order to identify, evaluate, recognize and reflect in the accounting and reporting of the company objects of accounting that are significant and of interest to users. The author investigated theoretical bases and practical aspects of application of professional judgment with the purpose of recognition of object and definition of its cost in the course of data collection, their analysis, and formation on their basis of professional judgment. The author has proved the need to adhere to the principle of additionality in finding the maximum complete description of the object and formulating a professional judgement about it. The author proposed a matrix model, which established the correspondence of risk levels and principles of application of professional judgment in accounting valuation and conducted an analysis of the conditions for the use of professional judgment in defining the fair value of financial instruments and inventories. The author considered the influence of uncertainties and corresponding risks in the application of professional judgment on the value of financial instruments and its adjustment in the conditions of unstable markets of countries with economies in transition. The author noted peculiarities of implementation of professional judgment in the process of preparation of financial and integrated reporting and the factors that determine them.

Main trends in the development of the Kazakh securities market

The securities market is the most important instrument for financing and developing the economy of any state, including Kazakhstan. The main problem is to attract investments for enterprises in all sectors of the economy, as well as to ensure that enterprises have access to cheaper equity than bank loans. Purpose to identify the main trends in the development of the domestic securities market, to assess the level of its profitability. The article emphasizes the role of the securities market as the most important mechanism for the redistribution of funds between sectors of the economy. The securities market, as an integral part of the financial market, is gaining especially growing importance in the economy of Kazakhstan, as well as in the economy of the entire world community. When writing the article, traditional methods (comparison, description, and measurement), general logical methods and research techniques (analysis, generalization, etc.) were used. The article discusses the main theoretical approaches to determining the essence of the analyzed concept, attempts are made to formulate the main problems in the securities market, presents the results of the analysis of data characterizing the current state of the stock market of Kazakhstan. In essence, the securities market is a macroeconomic regulator of the state, through which opportunities are created to attract foreign and domestic capital. Thus, the securities market as an effective tool for attracting capital contributes to solving socio-economic problems. The author notes that the main theories about the state of the stock market are characterized by a superficial approach, as evidenced by the fact that none of them considers the internal structure of the stock market, which is the main tool for determining the patterns of changes in the value of financial instruments. It should also be noted that the choice of theory depends entirely on the perception and opinion of the relevant analyst. Singling out one theory as the only and most acceptable one would be wrong.

The Rhetorical Handling and Construction of Uncertainty in Tax Litigation Concerning Valuation of Financial Instruments

Abstract A tax litigation concerning the value of non-traded financial instruments is impregnated by uncertainty. The aim of this paper is to study how uncertainty inherent in financial valuation models is discursively and rhetorically handled and constructed by the litigating parties as well as the court. A discourse analysis guided by the notion of hedging is conducted on The Swedish Tax Agency v. PwC (2013, 2014). The analysis demonstrates a sparse use of hedging. Rather, certainty characterizes tax litigation. However, the analysis shows that the litigating parties as well as the court participates in the construction of claims as facts, distancing themselves from their own claims and decisions.

Valuation Risk: A Holistic Accounting and Prudential Approach

Valuation Risk (VR) is the risk that an entity will experience a loss due to the inaccurate determination of the fair value of the financial instruments on its balance sheet. This risk is particularly significant for financial instruments with complex features, with limited-to-no liquidity, or with valuations that rely on internally developed models that may be seldom verified using actual trades. Bank VR has been drawing international supervisory attention recently. In February, the European Systemic Risk Board warned that the substantial amounts of instruments with complex features and limited liquidity that sit on banks’ balance sheets are a source of risk for the global financial system. In parallel, the European Central Bank has put trading risk and asset valuations among its supervisory priorities for 2020 and said it plans to execute investigations on banks with significant portfolios of complex instruments measured at fair value based on pricing models. Measured in terms of possible losses from fair value calculations and/or estimation errors on capital ratios, the potential impact of VR can be significant for banks with a combination of a high ratio of fair valued assets to total assets and a high leverage ratio. In such cases, even a relatively small error in determining fair values may significantly decrease the Tier 1 ratio. From a business perspective, banks with opaque and incomplete disclosure about the methods used to estimate the fair value (and the variation thereof) of complex financial instruments may find their stock prices penalized by financial analysts. The nature of VR differs from other banking risks. Market and credit risks, for example, are defined in terms of potential losses derived from the uncertainty about instrument prices over time. VR, however, measures uncertainty surrounding the difference between the reported fair value and the “true” tradeable price that a bank could obtain if it were to sell an asset or transfer a liability at a specific point in time (i.e., the valuation date). Prudential and accounting frameworks have designated a set of mitigation measures to deal with VR uncertainty, which are interrelated. We have conducted a comprehensive analysis of bank VR, encompassing governance, regulatory, and prudential dimensions and summarize it in the paper linked below. We describe the VR framework for a bank through a holistic approach, provide a detailed analysis of the relationships between the accounting and the prudential frameworks, and outline a methodological approach for the prudential treatment of VR. We conclude that: 1) Regulators will increasingly challenge banks over their fair value determination practices as part of a supervisory approach that looks for consistency and rigor across the whole valuation process. In this context, banks will face governance challenges on the clarity of the roles and responsibilities for different functions (namely, finance and risk.) 2) The requirements of the current prudential regulatory framework do not ensure that banks build a capital buffer large enough to address VR. Researchers and regulators should undertake additional studies to develop a sound and agreed upon methodology to identify and measure VR. 3) Regulators should require banks to provide more extensive disclosure about their exposure to VR. Increasing clarity and transparency around bank risks will enhance public trust and enable more accurate estimations of the risk embedded in banks’ balance sheets by observers and analysts. This would also be reflected in bank share prices.

Анализ методов ценообразования опционов: модель Блэка-Шоулза и метод Монте-Карло

Currently, the market of financial instruments is quite developed. Traditional financial instruments prevail on the Russian market, while derivatives of these financial instruments (options, futures, forwards, bills, etc.) are faintly developed. The reason for this situation is that few participants in the financial market can correctly evaluate financial products. Scientific researchers and large companies use different methods of estimating the value of financial instruments in making strategic investment decisions, since incorrect calculations can be irreparable. Therefore, it is important to apply the appropriate pricing methodology to various derivative financial instruments. The topic of derivative financial instruments in terms of scientific and theoretical aspects has been worked out in sufficient volume, but as for the pricing of these instruments, there are some gaps. There is still no method for pricing derivatives that would allow you to accurately assess the value of financial instruments for subsequent effective investment decisions. In this article considers the methodology of pricing of derivative financial instruments using the Black-Scholes model and the Monte Carlo method. The presented estimation methods allow us to calculate the range of price values that allows us to provide the most accurate expected results.

Diffusion of fair value measurement (IFRS 13): Perception of Auditors

This study investigates the diffusion of fair value measurement (IFRS 13), with a focus on extent of application, and valuation methods used by reporting entities in Nigeria. Data-collection was through a structured questionnaire administered on 400 auditors from diverse backgrounds in terms of audit firm size, international affiliation, and global presence. Analysis of data obtained from 277 respondents, using descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA, reveals that the overall extent of application of fair value measurement is moderate. However, there is significant difference in application level among reporting entities in the valuation of financial assets, financial liabilities, investment property, and goodwill & intangibles acquired in business combination, but no significant difference in the valuation of pension liabilities, endowment funds, share-based payments, property, plants & equipment, and land & building. It appears the level of investment in an asset/liability determines the application rate of fair value measurement—while high level of investment in an asset/ liability prompts extensive application, low level of investment correspondingly results into negligible usage. Further, the overall application rate of the valuation methods is in the descending order of: market, expert estimation, cost and income approaches respectively. The market and cost approaches are applied more extensively in the valuation of tangible assets; the market approach is preferred in the valuation of financial instruments, while expert estimation is more applicable in the valuation of intangible assets and liabilities. Given that the market approach is the predominant valuation method, the study calls on relevant authorities and concerned stakeholders to emplace institutional apparatus that will facilitate the ready availability of fair value prices for accounting items.

The effect of diffrerences of TFRS-9 and TMS-39 assessment methods on net working capital: implementation on companies subject to sustainability index

Purpose- Turkey Financial Reporting Standard-9 Financial Instruments Standard of (IFRS-9) 01.01.2018 Date of the ring was mandatory for the reporting of public companies. Turkey Accounting Standard-39 Recognition and Measurement Standard (TAS-39) brought a number of new regulations have emerged. Changes in the valuation of financial instruments are considered. Stata 14.1 Panel analysis was used to analyze the fair value of financial instruments and their effect on net working capital in firms subject to sustainability index. Methodology- This study was conducted in companies subject to the Sustainability Index between 2005-2018 using panel analysis in the Stata 14.1 program. Findings- According to the results reached, it has been determined that the increase in fair valuation in financial instruments has affected the net working capital. It was also determined that it caused an increase in the financial debt variable that we put as a dummy variable. Conclusion- The fair value method is important in evaluating financial instruments so that companies can effectively manage their asset and resource structures. As long as the companies can pay their short term debts and manage their short term assets correctly, it is thought that they can play a role in the market and compete with other companies. At the same time, the meaningful relationship between firms ability to pay their debts and their fair value is an expected result

Improving Evaluation Techniques for Credit Risky Securities

The present value of bonds and loans is commonly calculated as a sum of contractual cash flows discounted by default-free interest rates added by an appropriate credit spread. The evidence that investors require higher nominal returns for credit risky securities is commonly invoked as the main argument in support of this approach. However, although it is widely applied in the common practice, it remains a quick-fix solution for several reasons. First, it does not properly account for the probability of collecting contractual cash flows. Second, it leads to the wrong conclusion that the present value of financial instruments remains unchanged when fluctuations of risk-free rates are perfectly balanced by opposite changes in the relevant credit spread. Third, it makes the more risky bonds appear more profitable because credit spread, when included into discount rates, inevitably leads to calculate internal rates of return inversely correlated to the borrower’s creditworthiness. This work shows how refined cash-flow mapping techniques may be used in order to design a double-leg approach which properly accounts for expected credit losses and credit survival probabilities. This approach leads to an accurate evaluation of traded bonds on the sole basis of market information. In addition, it defines complete non-arbitrage conditions and overcomes the flaws of the most common pricing models for credit risky securities.

Model migration and rough edges: British actuaries and the ontologies of modelling.

The existing literature on modelling provides two main ways of viewing model migration: a modular view, which seeks to decompose models in their constitutive elements, and thus provides a view on what it is that migrates; and a practice-based view, which focuses on modelling as an activity, and understands a model as intricately entangled with its context of use. This article brings together these two sensitivities by focusing on ontologies of modelling. The paper presents a case study of the appropriation of modern finance theory’s ‘no-arbitrage’ models by British actuaries – a process that gradually unfolded at around the turn of the century and led to significant friction within the UK’s insurance industry. We can distinguish two main modelling ontologies: a ‘risk-neutral ontology’, which underpins no-arbitrage models and holds that the value of financial instruments is determined by ‘arbitrage’; and, a ‘real-world ontology’, which assumes that the economic world consists of real probabilities that may be approximated through a combination of archival-statistical methods and expert judgment. The appropriation of the risk-neutral modelling ontology was made possible by the declining legitimacy of actuarial expertise as ‘financial stewards’ of life insurance companies. The risk-neutral modelling ontology provided an ‘objective’ alternative to the traditional actuarial models, which explicitly required actuaries to make ‘prudent’ judgments. Despite the fact that the no-arbitrage modelling was considered an ‘objective’ affair, the valuation models that insurers use today are strongly shaped by political compromises, a result of the ‘rough edges’ of models.

Оцінка фінансових інструментів за справедливою вартістю в бухгалтерському обліку

Оцінка фінансових інструментів за справедливою вартістю в бухгалтерському обліку

Fair value accounting and earning management: The impact of unobservable inputs on earning quality. Evidence from the US

Accounting standard boards (IASB and FASB) are aimed at designing high-quality standards able to increase transparency and comparability of financial reporting. They have chosen fair value accounting (FVA) approach to improve the quality of financial reporting and at the same time help financial reporting users in the decision-making process. During recent years, an intense debate has arisen about the trade-off between relevance and reliability of accounting information using this approach. Many authors outline problems related to the fair value hierarchy valuation of financial instruments, in particular, the discretionary use of unobservable inputs in financial instruments valuation process in support of earnings management. Tutino and Pompili (2018) have identified a general negative correlation between the extent of FVA and earning quality. Stating this, the main objective of the paper, using the same approach of the previous one, is to identify the specific impacts of unobservable inputs on earning quality. Theory and previous literature suggest a major negative impact of unobservable inputs than observable ones on the quality of information provided within financial reporting. Results show a negative and strong relationship between FVA and earning quality for US banks that do not depend on the hierarchy of input used in the evaluation process. These results suggest new considerations on the reliability of fair value concerning the possibilities of manipulation given to the management with this approach.

Accounting Measurement Revolution and Market Value

The study is aims to examine whether the adoption of accounting measurement of AIS/IFRS standards has resulted in more relevant financial information for decision making or not. This study examines the use of fair value measurement on value of financial instruments to capture if there is any effect on the market value of financial companies. Ohlson (1995) framework has been employed to investigate this relationship. The Jordanian financial sector was the sample for the study during the years from 2012 to 2016. Our study findings, based on the results of correlation and multiple regression analysis showed that, market value of Jordanian financial companies is significantly positively related to financial instruments measured by fair values. The final result assured that; the new accounting measurements methods such as fair values are value relevant for Jordanian financial companiesduring all period of the study.

МЕТОДОЛОГІЧНІ ТА ОРГАНІЗАЦІЙНІ ЗАСАДИ ОЦІНКИ ФІНАНСОВИХ ІНСТРУМЕНТІВ СУБ’ЄКТА ГОСПОДАРЮВАННЯ

Peculiarities of accounting for transactions in derivative financial instruments are due to the risks inherent in such objects of accounting, in particular in terms of uncertainty about their fair value in the future. Improving the methods and forms of regulation of derivative financial instruments through the mechanisms of accounting methodology determine the need to find opportunities to improve the methodological and organizational principles of accounting in terms of valuation of derivatives, taking into account the practice of IFRS to achieve reliability of financial statements. Difficulties in reconciling UAS with IFRS on the valuation of derivative financial instruments (historical or fair value) are due to the application in regulations of different approaches to the formation of financial statements. It is proved that the use of the historical cost method for valuation of financial instruments is inappropriate, as their contractual nature is manifested in the ability to carry out indefinitely transactions that do not lead to cash settlements, but increase the financial risks of the enterprise. The application of the fair value method for the valuation of derivative financial instruments sets out special requirements for the organization of the valuation process of financial instruments in order to ensure the further choice of sources of financing and financial risk management. The list of elements of the accounting policy which should be provided in the administrative document on the accounting policy of the enterprise which cover methodical and organizational receptions of the account is defined. The classification of financial instruments is defined as the basis for the choice of accounting policy methods. The minimization of potential risks of losses due to the use of incorrect valuation of financial instruments should be facilitated by appropriate verification based on the comparison of valuation results based on independently obtained prices with the results provided as a result of valuation procedures. It is proved that the audit should cover liquid financial instruments, as well as those instruments that do not have market prices, which will facilitate further decisions on the adjustment of valuation models and methods.

First-Passage-Time Distribution for Variable-Diffusion Processes

First-passage-time distribution, which presents the likelihood of a stock reaching a pre-specified price at a given time, is useful in establishing the value of financial instruments and in designing trading strategies. First-passage-time distribution for Wiener processes has a single peak, while that for stocks exhibits a notable second peak within a trading day. This feature has only been discussed sporadically—often dismissed as due to insufficient/incorrect data or circumvented by conversion to tick time—and to the best of our knowledge has not been explained in terms of the underlying stochastic process. It was shown previously that intra-day variations in the market can be modeled by a stochastic process containing two variable-diffusion processes (Hua et al. in, Physica A 419:221–233, 2015). We show here that the first-passage-time distribution of this two-stage variable-diffusion model does exhibit a behavior similar to the empirical observation. In addition, we find that an extended model incorporating overnight price fluctuations exhibits intra- and inter-day behavior similar to those of empirical first-passage-time distributions.

Relevansi Nilai Selisih Loans Book Value dan Loans Fair Value, Book Value Per Share, Earnings Per Share dan Ukuran Perusahaan

One of the impacts of IFRS convergence is the tendency to leave historical cost to the fair value primarily for financial instruments, one of which is bank loans. Therefore, the benefit of the use of historical cost and fair value needs to be examined. This study aims to evaluate the relationship of the difference between loan book value and fair value, book value per share, earnings per share and the company size to the stock price of banks that use accounting standard that has been converged to IFRS. The samples used are banks listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period of 2010-2013. The relationship between the difference loans book value and fair value, book value per share, earnings per share and the size with the stock price were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results of this study indicate that the difference between loans book value and fair value, book value per share, earnings per share and the size can be used to predict the stock price of bank. Thus, the difference between loan book value and fair value of financial instruments have a relevant value.

Valuation of European and American Options under Variance Gamma Process

Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) is widely used to model the asset price dynamics. Option price models such as the Black-Sholes and the binomial tree models rely on the assumption that the underlying asset price dynamics follow the GBM. Modeling the asset price dynamics by using the GBM implies that the log return of assets at particular time is normally distributed. Many studies on real data in the markets showed that the GBM fails to capture the characteristic features of asset price dynamics that exhibit heavy tails and excess kurtosis. In our study, a class of Levy process, which is called a variance gamma (VG) process, performs much better than GBM model for modeling the dynamics of those stock indices. However, valuation of financial instruments, e.g. options, under the VG process has not been well developed. Here, we propose a new approach to the valuation of European option. It is based on the conditional distribution of the VG process. We also apply the path simulation model to value American options by assuming the underlying asset log return follow the VG process. Such a model is similar with that proposed by Tiley [1]. Simulation study shows that the proposed method performs well in term of the option price.

Conceptualizing Robustness in Risk Management

Two main areas of application of mathematics in finance are the valuation of financial instruments and the quantification of risk inherent in portfolios consisting of financial instruments. The mathematical models used in both areas were criticized in the aftermath of the financial crisis, due to the significant amount of model risk that was realized. Consequently, regulators and other stakeholders start to require that the internal models used by financial institutions are robust. In this paper, we answer the question how the robustness requirements can be consistently incorporated into the quantitative risk management process of a financial institution, with a special focus on insurance. We advocate the Wasserstein metric as the canonical metric for approximations in robust risk management. Writing risk measures as statistical functionals, we relate them to this approximation approach. This allows us to use results from robust statistics concerning continuity and differentiability of such functionals. Finally, we combine the mathematical ingredients of the risk management process in the risk management space and illustrate our approach via a practical application.