Abstract Background Clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (csCMVi) is the most frequent viral infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). A daily dose of 900 mg valganciclovir (VGC) as primary antiviral prophylaxis (PAP) is frequently administered to KTR at risk for csCMVi, including CMV donor (D)+/recipient (R)− and CMV R+ patients after induction immunosuppression with thymoglobulin (R+/TG) until 6- and 3-months post-transplant, respectively. Dose adjustments for VGC are recommended based on renal function to reduce potential myelotoxicity. There is paucity of real-life data on VGC dose adjustment as PAP and association with clinical outcomes. Method and Aims Bicentric and retrospective Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS)-embedded observational study including all consecutive adult D+/R− and R+/TG KTR between 2010 and 2020, who received PAP with VGC. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of VGC weekly entries, that was inappropriately (either under- or over-) dosed based on the associated renal function. Secondary objectives included the incidence of breakthrough csCMVi, potential associations between breakthrough-csCMVi and cytopenias with VGC dosing. Results Among 178 KTR included in both centres, 131 (73.6%) patients had at least two week entries for the longitudinal data of interest and were included in the outcome analysis. There were 1032 weekly VGC dose entries for 131 patients. Overall, 460 (44.6%) were appropriately dosed, while 234 (22.7%) and 338 (32.8%) were under- and over-dosed, respectively (Table 1). Inappropriate dosing was more frequent among R+/TG (133/214, 62.1%) than D+/R− (92/176, 52.3%, p = 0.05) during the first four weeks post-transplant. Nineteen (14.5%) patients had a breakthrough-csCMVi, without any association between breakthrough-csCMVi and VCG dosing (p = 0.44). Among cytopenias, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of weekly leucopenia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia values. In contrast, lymphopenia was more frequently observed when VGC was overdosed (p = 0.005, Table 2). Conclusion VGC as PAP in KTR is frequently inappropriately dosed, albeit without meaningful clinical associations, neither in terms of efficacy nor safety.