Valproate In Pregnancy Research Articles

Antiseizure medication use during pregnancy and children’s neurodevelopmental outcomes

The teratogenic potential of valproate in pregnancy is well established; however, evidence regarding the long-term safety of other antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy remains limited. Using routinely collected primary care data from the UK and nationwide Swedish registries to create a cohort of 3,182,773 children, of which 17,495 were exposed to ASMs in pregnancy, we show that those exposed to valproate were more likely to receive a diagnosis of autism, intellectual disability, and ADHD, when compared to children not exposed to ASMs. Additionally, children exposed to topiramate were 2.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with intellectual disability (95% CI: 1.23–4.98), and those exposed to carbamazepine were 1.25 times more likely to be diagnosed with autism (95% CI: 1.05–1.48) and 1.30 times more likely to be diagnosed with intellectual disability (95% CI: 1.01–1.69). There was little evidence that children exposed to lamotrigine in pregnancy were more likely to receive neurodevelopmental diagnoses. While further research is needed, these findings may support considering safer treatment alternatives well before conception when clinically appropriate.

Prenatal Exposure to Antiseizure Medications and Risk of Epilepsy in Children of Mothers With Epilepsy

Use of valproate and certain other antiseizure medications (ASMs) in pregnancy is associated with abnormal fetal brain development with potential long-term implications for the child. To examine whether use of valproate and other ASMs in pregnancy among mothers with epilepsy is associated with epilepsy risk in their children. This prospective, population-based register cohort study included singletons born to mothers with epilepsy in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2017. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to December 2023. Redeemed prescription for an ASM from 30 days before pregnancy until birth. The main outcome was epilepsy in children, assessed using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnoses from hospital care. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Secondary analyses included dose-response analyses, analyses using children of mothers who discontinued ASM prior to pregnancy as the reference, and sibling analyses. This cohort study included 38 663 children of mothers with epilepsy (19 854 [51.4%] boys). Children were followed up from birth; the mean length of follow-up was 7.2 years (range 0-22 years). Compared with 22 207 children of mothers not using an ASM in pregnancy, increased risks of epilepsy in children of mothers who used valproate in pregnancy (monotherapy: AHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.70-2.79; polytherapy: AHR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.49-2.96) were observed. However, there was no dose-dependent association, and there was a similar risk of epilepsy in siblings who were exposed and unexposed to valproate (AHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.50-1.82). Prenatal exposure to topiramate monotherapy was associated with increased risk of epilepsy (AHR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.30-4.16), and the risk was greater for higher doses, but the risk attenuated in comparisons with children of mothers who discontinued topiramate before pregnancy (AHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.26-5.44). Prenatal exposure to clonazepam monotherapy was also associated with increased epilepsy risk (AHR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.16-3.12), but limited follow-up and low numbers precluded further analyses. No associations were observed for prenatal exposure to lamotrigine (AHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.95-1.47), levetiracetam (AHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.77-2.14), carbamazepine (AHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.50), or oxcarbazepine (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.44-1.05). In this cohort study of children born to mothers with epilepsy, the associations found between prenatal exposure to certain ASMs and the child's risk of epilepsy did not persist in sensitivity analyses, suggesting that maternal ASM use in pregnancy may not increase epilepsy risk in children beyond that associated with the maternal epilepsy itself. These findings are reassuring for women in need of treatment with ASM in pregnancy.

Prenatal Exposure to Antiseizure Medication and Incidence of Childhood- and Adolescence-Onset Psychiatric Disorders

Prenatal antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure has been associated with adverse early neurodevelopment, but associations with a wider range of psychiatric end points have not been studied. To examine the association between prenatal exposure to ASM with a spectrum of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence in children of mothers with epilepsy. This prospective, population-based register study assessed 4 546 605 singleton children born alive in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2017. Of the 4 546 605 children, 54 953 with chromosomal disorders or uncertain birth characteristics were excluded, and 38 661 children of mothers with epilepsy were identified. Data analysis was performed from August 2021 to January 2023. Prenatal exposure to ASM was defined as maternal prescription fills from 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period until birth. The main outcome measure was diagnosis of psychiatric disorders (a combined end point and 13 individual disorders). Estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression and cumulative incidences with 95% CIs are reported. Among the 38 661 children of mothers with epilepsy (16 458 [42.6%] exposed to ASM; 19 582 [51.3%] male; mean [SD] age at the end of study, 7.5 [4.6] years), prenatal valproate exposure was associated with an increased risk of the combined psychiatric end point (aHR, 1.80 [95% CI, 1.60-2.03]; cumulative risk at 18 years in ASM-exposed children, 42.1% [95% CI, 38.2%-45.8%]; cumulative risk at 18 years in unexposed children, 31.3% [95% CI, 28.9%-33.6%]), which was driven mainly by disorders within the neurodevelopmental spectrum. Prenatal exposure to lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine was not associated with an increased risk of psychiatric disorders, whereas associations were found for prenatal exposure to topiramate with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (aHR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.40-4.06) and exposure to levetiracetam with anxiety (aHR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.26-3.72) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.03-3.07). Findings from this explorative study strengthen the evidence for the warning against the use of valproate in pregnancy and raise concern of risks of specific psychiatric disorders associated with topiramate and levetiracetam. This study provides reassuring evidence that lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine are not associated with long-term behavioral or developmental disorders but cannot rule out risks with higher doses.

Measures to Mitigate Sodium Valproate Use in Pregnant Women With Epilepsy.

Sodium valproate is a sodium saltof valproic acid. It is often used in the medical treatment of several conditions like epilepsy, bipolar disorder, mania, and migraines. This review debates whether the usage of valproic acid is appropriate in pregnancy. It also lists the various neonatal deformities and other teratogenic effects the said drug presents due to prenatal exposure to the drug and the implications of continuing drug therapy in certain situations. We should often weigh the outcomes and implement it only in conditions where its use is inevitable. It also includes the importance of awareness among middle-aged women with mental illness regarding the teratogenic effects of sodium valproate use and the relevance of discussion by physicians with patients regarding the usage of this drug despite being aware of the complications. It also explores other treatment options and modalities that can be used in the place of valproic acid for epilepsy and bipolar disorder in pregnant women and women of the reproductive age group, and how we can mitigate the usage of this drug by implementing various measures by referring to various guidelines present in different areas of the world. In summary, this article explores the numerous teratogenic effects sodium valproate presents in pregnancy, alternative medications, and treatment options instead of valproate. It also enumerates conditions where valproate use is necessary and how we can reduce and prevent the usage of valproate in pregnancy by opting for pregnancy prevention programs during valproate use and various other guidelines.

Valproate Teratogenicity: A Moving Target.

Within several years after receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the late 1970s, valproate was shown to increase the risk for major congenital malformations and learning disabilities in the offspring of women who used the drug during pregnancy. Nonetheless, its use in pregnant women has persisted for more than four decades, recently resulting in numerous lawsuits and, in countries other than the United States, criminal indictments of the manufacturers of valproate. The use of valproate in pregnancy persisted and extended beyond its original indication for the treatment of epilepsy. Several recent studies indicate that the drug is more often prescribed to treat pregnant women with bipolar depression and migraine than for seizure control. Especially concerning is the absence of valproate from the list of more than 60 drugs for which the FDA has implemented Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies to prevent or limit untoward consequences associated with specific drugs. Until this step is taken, avoidance of the teratogenic effects of valproate will rely on the vigilance of those caring for women and people with the potential to get pregnant.

Prenatal exposure to valproate and risk of congenital malformations-Could we have known earlier?-A population-based cohort study.

Prenatal exposure to the antiseizure medication (ASM) valproate is associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations, but warnings against the use of valproate in pregnancy were not issued until 2009. The objective was to study how early administrative health registers could have identified the teratogenic risk associated with valproate. This was a population-based cohort study of individual-linked data from Danish health care and socioeconomic registers including children born in Denmark between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2014. Information on ASM use, including valproate, in pregnancy was obtained from the Danish National Prescription Registry. Children identified with major congenital malformations from the Danish National Patient Register and the Danish Register of Causes of Death were included. Using logistic regression models, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for major congenital malformations during the first year of life in children with and without prenatal exposure to ASMs adjusted for potential confounders. Among the 895507 children (males, 51.3%), 31790 (3.6%) were diagnosed with a major congenital malformation in the first year of life. In the analyses including children born in 1997, the risk of major congenital malformations among children prenatally exposed to valproate compared with children not exposed to ASMs was increased by a fully adjusted OR (aOR) of 3.95 (95% CI = 1.65-9.47). With the addition of data from the following years, the teratogenic effect of valproate was further substantiated, as the precision of the estimate improved (1997-2014: aOR=2.44, 95% CI = 1.80-3.30). Using Danish health care data, we were able to identify a teratogenic risk associated with prenatal valproate exposure in children born in 1997, which is much earlier than prospective clinical cohorts. Health registry data represent an important tool for early identification of risk associated with drugs in pregnancy.

Newer versus older antiseizure medications: further forward?

Since 1990, many new antiseizure medications have been launched. Many have been licensed on the basis of evidence from add-on therapy in resistant epilepsies; there have been few head-to-head comparative data in patients who are newly diagnosed. 1 Lattanzi S Zaccara G Giovannelli F et al. Antiepileptic monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A network meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019; 139: 33-41 Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar Findings from Standard and New Antiepileptic Drugs (SANAD) I, the first SANAD trial, provided the first comprehensive data to address this question; lamotrigine was shown to be superior to carbamazepine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate in time to treatment failure, 2 Marson AG Al-Kharusi AM Alwaidh M et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1000-1015 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (677) Google Scholar and valproate was a clinically and cost-effective alternative to lamotrigine or topiramate. 3 Marson AG Al-Kharusi AM Alwaidh M et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1016-1026 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (645) Google Scholar However, since these trials were done, other medications have been licensed for use, and levetiracetam has been increasingly considered a safe alternative in the treatment of both focal and generalised epilepsies, despite few head-to-head comparative data, 4 Shih JJ Whitlock JB Chimato N Vargas E Karceski SC Frank RD Epilepsy treatment in adults and adolescents: expert opinion, 2016. Epilepsy Behav. 2017; 69: 186-222 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar specifically with the increasing concern about the effect of valproate in pregnancy on the unborn child. The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam, zonisamide, or lamotrigine for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trialThese findings do not support the use of levetiracetam or zonisamide as first-line treatments for patients with focal epilepsy. Lamotrigine should remain a first-line treatment for patients with focal epilepsy and should be the standard treatment in future trials. Full-Text PDF Open AccessThe SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of valproate versus levetiracetam for newly diagnosed generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trialCompared with valproate, levetiracetam was found to be neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. For girls and women of child-bearing potential, these results inform discussions about benefit and harm of avoiding valproate. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Valproate in pregnancy: comment from the SAPP.

Valproate in pregnancy: comment from the SAPP.

Valproate in pregnancy: authors' reply.

Valproate in pregnancy: authors' reply.

Use of Phenytoin, Phenobarbital Carbamazepine, Levetiracetam Lamotrigine and Valproate in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Risk of Major Malformations, Dose-dependency, Monotherapy vs Polytherapy, Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Implications.

It is challenging to balance the fetal risks associated with the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) against maternal and fetal risks of seizure worsening, and therefore it is very important to define and distinguish the possible risks entailed by different AEDs. This paper aims to undertake a comprehensive review regarding the possible risks of four classical (phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and valproate) and two newer (lamotrigine and levetiracetam) AEDs during pregnancy. The review focuses on major and organ-specific malformations, dose-dependent risks, mono vs polytherapy, and clinical pharmacokinetics. A discussion regarding the safety of AED use during breastfeeding is also provided.

Use of valproate in pregnancy and in women of childbearing age between 2014 and 2018 in Switzerland: a retrospective analysis of Swiss healthcare claims data.

The prevalence of the use of valproate during pregnancy and by women of childbearing age in Switzerland is not known. We aimed to study the use of antiseizure drugs by these women in Switzerland, with a particular focus on valproate. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study using the healthcare claims database of the Swiss health insurance Helsana (2014–18). We established two separate study populations: (1) a cohort of pregnancies leading to a delivery, and (2) all women of childbearing age (15–45 years) who were insured with Helsana for at least one year during the study period. We identified the dispensation of valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, levetiracetam, topiramate, pregabalin, gabapentin, phenobarbital, and phenytoin (1) between delivery and three months prior to the estimated date of the last menstrual period, and (2) by calendar year. We quantified exposure prevalence of each antiseizure drug as the number of women with ≥1 prescription fill per 10,000 (1) pregnancies, and (2) women by calendar year. Results were weighted for the demographic distribution of the Helsana population relative to the Swiss population. We identified a weighted pregnancy population of 387,418 pregnancies, with a mean maternal age at delivery of 31.9 years (standard deviation 5.1). Lamotrigine was the most frequently dispensed antiseizure drug during pregnancy (20/10,000), followed by levetiracetam (11/10,000), and pregabalin (3.8/10,000). Valproate was dispensed to 1.9/10,000 women during pregnancy and to 1.3/10,000 women within 90 days prior to the last menstrual period but not during pregnancy. The weighted study population of women aged 15–45 years consisted of 2,781,151 women, of whom 74,080 (270/10,000) were exposed to ≥1 of the evaluated antiseizure drugs. Pregabalin was the most frequently dispensed antiseizure drug (64/10,000), followed by lamotrigine (46/10,000), topiramate (32/10,000), and valproate (25/10,000). The use of valproate decreased from 28/10,000 women in 2014 to 21/10,000 women in 2018. The prevalence of exposure to valproate during pregnancy was comparable to Denmark and lower than in other European countries. Despite decreasing exposure prevalence, the use of valproate in women of childbearing age in Switzerland seems higher than the actual clinical need.

Sodium valproate in psychiatric practice: time for a change in perception.

D.C.O. is psychiatric commissioner on the Commission on Human Medicines and a member of the European Medicines Agency's Scientific Advisory Group on Psychiatry. He chaired the European Medicines Agency's review of the psychiatric use of valproate in pregnancy and women of childbearing potential.

Valproate in Pregnancy: Recent Research and Regulatory Responses.

Valproate and formulations thereof are approved for the management of seizure disorders, bipolar disorder, and migraine. Valproate is also used for many off-label indications. Unfortunately, data from observational studies indicate that valproate is perhaps the most teratogenic drug in the neuropsychiatric pharmacopeia. It is significantly more teratogenic than many other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). In observational studies, gestational exposure to valproate is also associated with higher risks of cognitive, language, and psychomotor delay during early childhood and possibly with an increased risk of autism, as well. Although untreated epilepsy is itself associated with many adverse gestational and neonatal outcomes, confounding by indication is an unlikely explanation for the adverse outcomes observed with valproate. This is because of the range of the adverse outcomes, the magnitude of the risks, the dose-dependent nature of the risks, the consistency of findings across studies, the specificity of outcomes for valproate exposure, and the greater risks with valproate relative to other AEDs. Despite the existence of a large body of literature that documents these risks, valproate continues to be prescribed to a substantial proportion of women of childbearing potential. As a result, many regulatory bodies across the world have discouraged and even banned the use of valproate during pregnancy and in women of childbearing potential unless no satisfactory alternatives exist or unless a pregnancy prevention program is implemented.

Sodium valproate in pregnancy: what are the risks and should we use a shared decision-making approach?

BackgroundDespite significant teratogenic risks, sodium valproate is still widely prescribed in many countries to women of childbearing age, as a mood stabiliser in bipolar disorder and also in epilepsy. The UK has recently banned valproate use in women who are not in a pregnancy prevention programme. Whilst this ruling reflects prevailing clinical practice, it also highlights an ongoing debate about when (if ever) a woman who is or could become pregnant should be allowed to choose to take valproate.Main bodyWe review the benefits and harms of drugs available for bipolar disorder and epilepsy in women of childbearing age, with a particular focus on teratogenic risk. We speculate on hypothetical rare situations in which potential benefits of valproate may outweigh potential harms in such women. We also review the literature on shared decision-making – on which there is now a NICE guideline and numerous evidence-based decision tools. Drawing on previous work by experts in shared decision-making, we offer a list of ‘frequently asked questions’ and a matrix of options to support conversations with women about continuing or discontinuing the drug in (or in anticipation of) pregnancy. We also consider whether shared decision-making is an appropriate paradigm when considering whether to continue a teratogenic drug.ConclusionWe conclude that because valproate in pregnancy remains the subject of such debate, there is scope for further research – not only into the relative efficacy and safety of alternatives to it – but also into the dynamics of communication and shared decision-making in this situation.

More recommendations to minimise exposure to ▼ valproate in pregnancy.

More recommendations to minimise exposure to ▼ valproate in pregnancy.

Valproate: life-saving, life-changing

Antiepileptic medications, and valproate principally, are commonly prescribed teratogens. There is significant concern that we are not doing enough to educate clinicians and potential parents about the risks of valproate in pregnancy. There is clear advice from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency and the International League Against Epilepsy about the risks of valproate exposure in utero. Reviews and guidelines that are focused on fetal risk, however, fall short in being able to fully replicate the complexity of a real clinical decision. Valproate is certainly life-changing if your child is one of the 10% with a major malformation or 30–40% with a neurodevelopmental disorder, but valproate is also potentially life-saving in the context of ensuring the best possible seizure control for some mothers with epilepsy. There are significant knowledge gaps regarding the risks to mothers who elect to take another drug, or to mother and baby if she comes off medication entirely. We also should be doing more to reduce rates of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), which is recognised as a key target when evaluating all maternal deaths.

Pharmacokinetic variability of valproate during pregnancy – Implications for the use of therapeutic drug monitoring

Background and purposeUse of valproate (VPA) in women of childbearing age is restricted due to dose-dependent risk of teratogenicity. The purpose of this study was to characterise pharmacokinetic variability of VPA in pregnancy, and discuss use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as guidance to exposure in women. MethodMeasurements of trough total and unbound VPA concentrations before, during and after pregnancy, at assumed steady-state were collected from the TDM-database (2006–2016) at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway. Additional clinical data were obtained from the Oppland county Perinatal Database (1994–2011). ResultsData from 51 pregnancies in 33 women aged 19–40 years were included. Each woman underwent 1–4 pregnancies, and 1–7 measurements per pregnancy were performed. The variability in total concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios between women was 13-fold, and intra-patient variability extensive. Total C/D-ratios were reduced by 46% from before pregnancy to third trimester (0.48–0.29 μmol/L/mg). Unbound concentrations of VPA were only requested in 10% of the pregnancies. Repeated measurements from two pregnancies in one women revealed increased unbound concentration of VPA during pregnancy. There were 19 with idiopathic generalized epilepsy and two focal based on clinical data from 21 women and 38 pregnancies; 1 major congenital malformation was noted. ConclusionThere is pronounced pharmacokinetic variability of VPA during pregnancy. Unbound concentrations are rarely requested. TDM should be used by measurements of both total and unbound concentrations since total concentrations may be misleading for efficacy and fetal exposure of VPA.

EMA sets out new measures to avoid risk from valproate in pregnancy

EMA sets out new measures to avoid risk from valproate in pregnancy

Repeat warning on ▾ valproate in pregnancy as message fails to raise awareness

Repeat warning on ▾ valproate in pregnancy as message fails to raise awareness

Valproate in pregnancy or childbearing females: PRAC review

Valproate in pregnancy or childbearing females: PRAC review