Validity In Relation Research Articles

The Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS) questionnaire: psychometric qualities of the parenting scale in two large Brazilian birth cohorts.

Analyse the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the PAFAS (Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales) parenting scale, using data from two large Brazilian birth cohorts. The original PAFAS parenting scale, which consists of 18 items (parental inconsistency 5 items, coercive parenting 5 items, positive encouragement 3 items, and parent-child relationship 5 items) was applied in two Brazilian birth cohorts in Pelotas (ages 4 [n = 4010] and 6-7 [n = 3867]) and Rio Grande (age 3 [n = 992]). Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted, and internal consistency assessed, as well as construct validity in relation to maternal depression measured on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The model with a structure of 4 subscales showed that the global scale of parenting on the PAFAS had a good fit, but certain items did not fit well on sub-scales and were removed (2 items from parental inconsistency, 1 from coercive parenting, and 1 from positive encouragement). The original form of the parent-child relationship sub-scale was maintained. Considering the total PAFAS parenting score, we found that mothers with maternal depression had a higher likelihood of more problematic parental practices than mothers without depression. A revised 14-item PAFAS parenting scale has good psychometric properties and we encourage its use in Brazilian populations.

Assessing Affective Dimensions of the Interpersonal Circumplex: Development and Validation of the Interpersonal Emotion Inventory

Interpersonal emotions are feelings distinctively associated with real or imagined interpersonal situations. We propose that interpersonal emotions can be organized within the same circumplex used by contemporary integrative interpersonal theory to organize other aspects of interpersonal functioning. Our research explores the affective dimensions underpinning the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) and maps distinct emotional dispositions using coordinates for agentic and communal affect. Our aim is to provide a better differentiated and more comprehensive taxonomy of interpersonal emotions consistent with the IPC framework. In an initial development study (N = 1223 undergraduates) we used circumplex and psychometric criteria to create a 64-item Interpersonal Emotion Inventory (IEI), a novel self-report measure of interpersonal emotions reflecting each IPC octant. We then tested the structural properties and utility of the IEI in a preregistered validation study (N = 278 community participants). Across both studies, the IEI scales exhibited good fit to a two-dimensional circular model. The IEI demonstrated robust convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity in relation to measures of interpersonal values and problems, positive and negative affect, adult attachment, self-conscious emotions, self-esteem, and facets of narcissism. By complementing existing measures of affect and interpersonal phenomena, the IEI should prove useful in both research and clinical contexts.

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales for Youth (DASS-Y): evidence of validity and cross-national and gender measurement invariance.

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales for Youth (DASS-Y) is a recently developed measure of unpleasant emotional experiences for children and adolescents; however, the evidence for its validity is still limited. The present study evaluated the evidence for the structural, convergent, and incremental validity of the DASS-Y on a sample of Serbian adolescents aged 15-19 years (N = 421; 48% female, mean age = 16.86). Measurement invariance across gender and two countries (Serbia and Australia) was also tested. The findings supported the bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (bifactor-ESEM) representation of the DASS-Y, which includes the General factor of negative affect/emotional distress, and three specific factors of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. The DASS-Y factors showed evidence of incremental validity in predicting global externalizing symptoms and demonstrated convergent validity in relation to measures of global internalizing and externalizing symptoms as well as subjective well-being. The bifactor-ESEM model of the DASS-Y was found to be invariant across gender and two countries. The present study findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between general and specific components of unpleasant emotional states.

Psychometric testing of the cross-culturally adapted Thai version of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0 in individuals with chronic illnesses

ObjectiveTo assess the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale version 3.0 (SCSES-v3.0) in individuals with chronic illnesses. Although originally developed and tested in a Western context, its applicability in Asian populations, including Thailand, remains inadequately explored. MethodsPsychometric tests were guided by COSMIN principles. This included the translation of the English version into Thai based on the ISPOR framework. Nine nursing experts evaluated the content validity. Data were obtained from a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted between July and November 2022. This study included individuals with chronic conditions from 16 primary care centers in Thailand. We tested the structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and concurrent validity in relation to the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory version 4.c (SC-CII-v4.c). We tested the scale’s reliability with McDonald’s ω, Cronbach’s α, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ResultsThe Thai SCSES-v3.0 demonstrated excellent content validity (k = 1.00). The final analysis included a total of 385 participants. The EFA with the first split-half subsample (n = 193) extracted a two-factor structure. One reflected SCSES for maintenance and monitoring behaviors and another captured SCSES for management behaviors (item 6–10). CFA with the second split-half subsample (n = 192) and the overall sample (n = 385) supported the scale’s two-factor model with high factor loadings. Each dimension and the overall SCSES-v3.0 positively correlated with each scale and the overall SC-CII-v4.c. McDonald’s ω and Cronbach’s α (both ranged 0.91–0.94) and ICC (ranged 0.95–0.96), indicated excellent internal reliability and test-retest reliability, respectively. ConclusionsThe identification of a valid and reliable two-factor model for the Thai SCSES-v3.0 renders it a valuable tool for clinicians and investigators, facilitating the assessment of self-efficacy in self-care across diverse contexts.

Locating triarchic model constructs in the hierarchical structure of a comprehensive trait-based psychopathy measure: Implications for research and clinical assessment.

The triarchic model posits that distinct trait constructs of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition underlie psychopathy. The triarchic model traits are conceptualized as biobehavioral dimensions that can be assessed using different sets of indicators from alternative measurement modalities; as such, the triarchic model would hypothesize that these traits are not confined to any one item set. The present study tested whether the triarchic model dimensions would emerge from a hierarchical-structural analysis of the facet scales of the Elemental Psychopathy Assessment (EPA), an inventory designed to comprehensively index psychopathy according to the five-factor personality model. Study participants (Ns = 811, 170) completed the EPA and three different scale sets assessing the triarchic traits along with criterion measures of antisocial/externalizing behaviors. Bass-ackwards modeling of the EPA facet scales revealed a four-level structure, with factors at the third level appearing similar to the triarchic trait dimensions. An analysis in which scores for the Level-3 EPA factors were regressed onto corresponding latent-trait dimensions defined using the different triarchic scale sets revealed extremely high convergence (βs = .84-.91). The Level-3 EPA factors also evidenced validity in relation to relevant criteria, approximating and sometimes exceeding that evident for the Level-4 EPA factors. Together, these results indicate that the triarchic trait constructs are embedded in a psychopathy inventory designed to align with a general personality model and effectively predict pertinent external criteria. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Psychometric Properties of the Internalized Homonegativity Scale in Adults

The main objective was to know the evidence of validity and reliability of the Internalized Homonegativity Scale. This theory is based on the stress of sexual minorities, which focuses on the psychological affectations of minority groups based on discrimination, prejudice and stigma. A total of 313 persons between the ages of 18 and 49 years were evaluated. The content validity, factor analysis and reliability were assessed. The content validity, to which it was subjected, yielded acceptable values. The CFA allowed maintaining the trifactorial structure and a McDonald coefficient of .84 was obtained for the general scale. Likewise, the Wagnild & Young Resilience Scale was used to determine the validity in relation to other variables and presents an inverse relationship of small magnitude. The study shows that the IHS has adequate psychometric properties, evidencing its usefulness for the measurement of internalized homonegativity. Received: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 02 July 2024

A quasi‐experimental investigation of differences between face‐to‐face and videoconference interviews in an actual selection process

AbstractVideoconference interviews are now integral to many selection processes. Theoretical arguments and empirical findings suggest that videoconference interviews may lead to different interview performance ratings in comparison to Face‐to‐Face (FTF) interviews. This has led to the question of the comparability of the psychometric properties of videoconferences and FTF interviews. However, evidence from actual selection processes stems from the beginning of the century, and recent findings predominantly stem from simulated interview contexts. We present insights from an actual selection process within a large European organization where we had the unique opportunity for a quasi‐experimental investigation of differences between videoconference and FTF interviews. Initially, the organization conducted FTF interviews, and after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the interviews were conducted via videoconference. We examine mean differences in applicant performance ratings and evidence for response format‐related validity differences. There were only small, non‐significant mean differences and no evidence for response format related validity differences. We discuss possible causes for discrepancies in our findings compared to previous research. Furthermore, we conclude that downstream consequences of differences between FTF and videoconference interviews may be lower than previously expected. We end with a call for research on the interaction between technology‐design and selection‐tool‐design features.

The SCREENIVF Hungarian version is a valid and reliable measure accurately predicting possible depression in female infertility patients

Infertility patients, often in high distress, are entitled to being informed about their mental status compared to normative data. The objective of this study was to revalidate and test the accuracy of the SCREENIVF, a self-reported tool for screening psychological maladjustment in the assisted reproduction context. A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based online survey was carried out between December 2019 and February 2023 in a consecutive sample of female patients (N = 645, response rate 22.9%) in a university-based assisted reproduction center in Hungary. Confirmatory factor analysis and cluster and ROC analyses were applied to test validity, sensitivity and specificity in relation to Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores. Model fit was optimal (chi-square = 630.866, p < 0.001; comparative fit index = 0.99; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.018 (90% CI 0.013–0.023); standardized-root-mean-square-residual = 0.044), and all dimensions were reliable (α > 0.80). A specific combination of cutoffs correctly predicted 87.4% of BDI-scores possibly indicative of moderate-to-severe depression (χ2(1) = 220.608, p < 0.001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.462, J = 66.4). The Hungarian version of the SCREENIVF is a valid and reliable tool, with high accuracy in predicting BDI-scores. Low response rate may affect generalizability. The same instrument with different cutoffs can serve various clinical goals.

Psychometric properties and criterion related validity of the Norwegian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0

BackgroundSeveral studies have been conducted with the 1.0 version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) in Norway and globally. The 2.0 version has not been translated and tested in Norwegian hospital settings. This study aims to 1) assess the psychometrics of the Norwegian version (N-HSOPSC 2.0), and 2) assess the criterion validity of the N-HSOPSC 2.0, adding two more outcomes, namely ‘pleasure of work’ and ‘turnover intention’.MethodsThe HSOPSC 2.0 was translated using a sequential translation process. A convenience sample was used, inviting hospital staff from two hospitals (N = 1002) to participate in a cross-sectional questionnaire study. Data were analyzed using Mplus. The construct validity was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was tested using Average Variance Explained (AVE), and internal consistency was tested with composite reliability (CR) and Cronbach’s alpha. Criterion related validity was tested with multiple linear regression.ResultsThe overall statistical results using the N-HSOPSC 2.0 indicate that the model fit based on CFA was acceptable. Five of the N-HSOPSC 2.0 dimensions had AVE scores below the 0.5 criterium. The CR criterium was meet on all dimensions except Teamwork (0.61). However, Teamwork was one of the most important and significant predictors of the outcomes. Regression models explained most variance related to patient safety rating (adjusted R2 = 0.38), followed by ‘turnover intention’ (adjusted R2 = 0.22), ‘pleasure at work’ (adjusted R2 = 0.14), and lastly, ‘number of reported events’ (adjusted R2=0.06).ConclusionThe N-HSOPSC 2.0 had acceptable construct validity and internal consistency when translated to Norwegian and tested among Norwegian staff in two hospitals. Hence, the instrument is appropriate for use in Norwegian hospital settings. The ten dimensions predicted most variance related to ‘overall patient safety’, and less related to ‘number of reported events’. In addition, the safety culture dimensions predicted ‘pleasure at work’ and ‘turnover intention’, which is not part of the original instrument.

Initial Validation of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire in a Sample of Portuguese Athletes.

Our primary objectives in this study were to translate and provide psychometric support for the Coach Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) Portuguese version, assess its invariance across sex, and explore its nomological validity in relation to enjoyment. Our sample participants were 470 athletes (226 females, 244 males) aged between 16 to 39 years from various individual and team sports. We found that the translated Portuguese version of the CART-Q exhibited satisfactory test-retest reliability and can serve as a reliable tool for evaluating the core constructs of the coach-athlete relationship - closeness, commitment, and complementarity. Moreover, this instrument showed evidence of nomological validity through significant positive correlations between its underlying factors and athletes' enjoyment with their sport. The proposed model for explaining item variance was also found to be invariant between male and female respondents. We recommend further use of this instrument in research and practical applications.

The Chronic Time Pressure Inventory: further assessment of factorial structure and validity.

Chronic time pressure represents a prevalent concern within modern society, and effective measurement is crucial for research advancement. The Chronic Time Pressure Inventory (CTPI) has thus far demonstrated adequate psychometric properties. However, only two studies have examined the measure and evidence of its validity is limited. Accordingly, the current investigation, via two independent studies, assessed the factorial composition and validity (convergent/discriminant) of the CTPI. Study 1 (N = 398) examined competing factorial models and validity in relation to the Big Five personality traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, Openness). Study 2 (N = 358) replicated the analysis of factor structure and assessed validity in comparison with five time perspectives (Past Negative, Present Fatalistic, Future, Past Positive, Present Hedonistic). Participants across both studies completed standardized self-report measures capturing the variables. Comparison of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) factor solutions indicated that an ESEM bifactor model provided the strongest data-model fit. This included a general chronic time pressure component alongside specific subfactors of Feeling Harried and Cognitive Awareness of Time Shortage. All scale items reflected the general factor; however, some items loaded weakly on the intended specific factor. The CTPI is thus a robust indicator of chronic time pressure but needs refinement as a measure of the specific factors. Convergent/discriminant validity analyses inferred that the CTPI captured chronic time pressure as a related, but distinct, construct to perceived stress, and evidenced a relationship with theoretically associated constructs (Big Five personality traits and time perspective). Overall, the CTPI is a sound measure of chronic time pressure and has the potential to further cohesive research efforts on the contribution of this construct to various life domains.

Measuring Burnout: A Validation Study of The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for The Sri-Lankan IT Sector

Burnout is a psychological syndrome emerging as a prolonged response to chronic interpersonal stressors on the job. WHO defines burnout as an “occupational phenomenon” and is included in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Research reveals the existence of this burnout phenomenon across a range of occupations, such as healthcare professionals, teachers, athletes, pilots, IT professionals etc. A study conducted by Yerbo, a mental wellbeing platform revealed that 2 in 5 of the workers in the IT industry show a high risk of burnout. At present, there are few tools available to measure burnout. After the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) is considered the most widely used measure of burnout and is also freely available. The current study is aimed at determining the measurement validity of the OLBI in the local context based on IT professionals. To determine the content validity of the OLBI, an expert panel was employed. In order to examine the construct validity and concurrent criterion validity, a questionnaire-based study was conducted among 161 (n = 161) randomly chosen IT professionals. MBI and DASS-21 were used to explore the convergent and divergent validity of the OLBI. Four items were deemed not essential to measure burnout based on content validation. The MTMM analysis revealed adequate evidence of the existence of both convergent and divergent validity of the OLBI. The current study was able to provide evidence of content, concurrent criterion and construct related validity of the OLBI in the Sri Lankan context based on IT professionals. These findings suggest that OLBI can be used as a reasonable tool to measure burnout among IT professionals in Sri Lanka. Availability of such a tool will undoubtedly help organizations in ensuring their workforce is healthy and productive. KEYWORDS: Occupational burnout, Content validity, Construct validity, Criterion validity, Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, Multi Trait Multi Method Matrix

Validation of the Super-Brief Pathological Narcissism Inventory (SB-PNI) among Swedish adolescents

This study examines the psychometric structure and properties of the Swedish version of the Super-Brief Pathological Narcissism Inventory (SB-PNI) among adolescents. In order to ensure the validity and feasibility of the measure, we examined the factor structure, measurement invariance across gender, age and ethnicity, and construct validity in relation to a number of correlates of narcissism in adolescence. Data were drawn from a large cross-sectional survey conducted in 35 schools in southern Sweden. The sample consisted of N = 5313 adolescents (Mage = 16.10 SD = 1.55) with 52.2% girls, 45.9% boys and 1.8% adolescents with unspecified gender, from compulsory and upper secondary schools in southern Sweden. The results showed that the measure holds a two-factor structure, suggesting the use of the subscales grandiosity and vulnerability separately, rather than as a unidimensional measure. The correlated factors grandiosity and vulnerability yielded full configural and metric invariance across gender, age, and ethnicity. Both grandiosity and vulnerability were correlated with externalizing and internalizing symptoms, as well as with low self-esteem. The study provides evidence for the utility of the SB-PNI among Swedish adolescents and indicates that the measure can be used across male and female adolescents of different ages and ethnic groups.

Leaflet to assess, prevent and treat friction injury

Objective: to develop and validate the content of a leaflet to guide health professionals in the assessment, prevention and treatment of friction injuries. Method: To create the leaflet, an integrative literature review was carried out using the MEDLINE®, Lilacs and SciELO virtual library databases. Articles published between 2019 and 2023 were researched. The leaflet was validated by 98 nurses who were experts in the field, using the Delphi technique. For data analysis, the Content Validity Coefficient test was adopted. Results: in the first evaluation cycle, the Content Validity Coefficient varied between 0.75 and 0.86. After corrections requested by the judges, the leaflet was resent for the second evaluation cycle, with the related Content Validity Coefficient varying between 0.93 and 1.0. Conclusion: the leaflet to guide health professionals in the assessment, prevention and treatment of friction injuries was evaluated by specialist nurses in the field, who reached a consensus regarding the content in the second evaluation cycle.

Abstract WMP69: Brain Atrophy and White Matter Disease Agreement on NCCT and MRI in Ischemic Stroke

Background: NCCT is the most widely used parenchymal imaging for acute stroke. Evaluations of brain frailty measures like atrophy and white matter disease (WMD) are becoming increasingly relevant in stroke outcome prediction but are conventionally thought to be best seen on MRI. We assessed the agreement between baseline NCCT and follow-up MRI ratings of brain atrophy and WMD and compared their predictive validity in relation to 90-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of baseline NCCT and follow-up MRI data from the Alteplase compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) randomised-controlled trial, expert readers (stroke neurologists and radiologists) assessed atrophy using the global cortical atrophy (GCA), Koedam, and medial temporal lobe atrophy scales. WMD was measured using the Fazekas scale. Binary agreement (none-mild vs. moderate-severe) and agreement across the full range of scores between atrophy and WMD measures on NCCT and MRI were calculated using Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1). Logistic regressions and Delong’s test were used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-1 when using NCCT vs MRI-based ratings for each atrophy and WMD variable. Results: Of 1577 patients included in the AcT trial, 491 had interpretable NCCT+MRI. Binary agreement was substantial (AC1:0.68-0.80) for deep and total WMD scores, Koedam scale and frontal GCA. Almost perfect binary agreement (AC1:0.81-0.97) was found for all other measures. Deep white matter showed a significant difference between NCCT and MRI ratings for predicting 90-day mRS 0-1 (MRI AUC = 0.61 [0.56-0.66], CT AUC = 0.56 [0.50-0.60], p = 0.01, Delong p = 0.02) There was no significant difference in predicting 90-day mRS for the other variables (all p &gt; 0.12, GCA: MRI AUC = 0.54 [0.49-0.60] CT AUC = 0.53 [0.47-0.58], p = 0.58, Delong p = 0.86). Conclusion: NCCT ratings of brain atrophy and WMD by experts have substantial to almost-perfect agreement with MRI atrophy and WMD ratings and achieve similar prediction of 90-day mRS 0-1 functional outcomes in acute stroke patients. This implies that it is reasonable to use NCCT scans to evaluate these brain frailty measures in clinical practice and in stroke trials.

Relationship of selected conditioning parameters and sport performance indicators in karate.

The variables of aerobic performance and aerobic capacity are of significant importance in maintaining intensity during a fight and also contribute to faster recovery between rounds in sports fighting in karate. Anaerobic performance is crucial for the execution of the techniques during high-intensity offensive or defensive actions that determine the outcome of a fight. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between selected performance indicators of aerobic and anaerobic capacity to sports performance in karate. The study included six male karate athletes (age 28 ± 3 years, body mass 85.10 kg; height 185.5 cm), medalists from European and World championship, events in senior categories. The selection criteria included training experience and sports level. The Karate specific aerobic test (KSAT) was use in conjunction with heart rate monitoring and changes in blood lactate levels to diagnose special aerobic endurance parameters. To determine the level of anaerobic performance the Wingate test were choosed. Technical and tactical indicators (efficiency, effectiveness and activeness of the attack) were used to assess the sports skill level during competition. Based on the Spearman correlation coefficient results demonstrated statistically significant differences (rs = -0.81) with large effect size index between efficiency of the attack and average heart rate achieved in the test KSAT. Additionally statistically significant differences (rs = 0.81) with large effect size were demonstrated between the fatigue index and efficiency of the attack Furthermore, the selected indicators of special aerobic endurance parameters and anaerobic performance demonstrated a high degree of predictive validity in relation to the efficiency (rp = 0.960) and activity (rp = 0.927) of attacks. The high level of predictive validity confirmed the importance of a high level of anaerobic conditions for performance in karate. The low values of the average heart rate in relation to the efficiency of the attack confirm the high performance level of karate athletes in relation to special aerobic performance parameters. It was found that the effectiveness of the attack had no relation to the monitored parameters.

The Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2): Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Validity in a Brazilian Sample.

To examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Suicide Crisis Inventory (SCI-2) among Brazilian adults. The SCI-2 was cross-culturally adapted into Portuguese and administered to 2,265 individuals in the Brazilian community. Confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency, and convergent and criterion validity against the suicidal narrative, stressful life events, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts were examined. The revised one-factor model of the SCI-2 resulted in adequate, but not optimal, model fit (χ2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < .001, CFI = .99, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .09, SRMR = .05). The revised five-factor model, on the other hand, demonstrated good fit (χ2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < .001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = .06, SRMR = .04). Comparison of these two models indicated that the five-factor exhibited a superior model fit to the one-factor model. The SCI-2 total and subscales showed strong internal consistency, good convergent, and criterion validity in relation to stressful life events, suicidal narrative (except goal disengagement subscale), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. These findings indicate that the Brazilian version of the SCI-2 is a valid tool for measuring symptoms of the Suicide Crisis Syndrome.

Specifics of film/video translation of the realities of Chinese culture into Russian (based on the material of feature films).

The problem of transmitting the national and cultural identity of a people through language is due to the presence in the latter of special linguistic and cultural units, which include realia. This work is devoted to the problem of describing and systematizing realities in such a specific field of translation activity as film/video translation. The object of the study was the words-realities of Chinese culture, the subject of the study was the specifics of their translation into Russian. The research material was the historical series «The Three Kingdoms» in Chinese with Russian subtitles. The methodological basis of the study was the method of discursive analysis of film text, proposed in the works of R. A. Matasov. The results of the study made it possible to systematize the word-realia into thematic groups, give them a linguocultural commentary, identify the method of translating the word-realia and evaluate its validity in relation to the original film text.

A study: Semi-confirmatory factor analysis and reliability of the symptom assessment-45 questionnaire in Peruvian population

The study of psychopathological variables constitutes a valuable resource in the field of mental health, but even more so when there are evaluation support tools that facilitate its exploration. In addition, when these tools are valid and reliable, they provide optimal data, which guides towards a better intervention response, which is extremely necessary in the face of the reality that exists in terms of mental health needs. Therefore, this work seeks to analyze the evidence of the construct validity of SA-45, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. In addition, to find the reliability of the Symptom Assessment-45 Questionnaire (SA-45). The SA-45, and other measures (LOT-4, DASS-21) were applied to 1637 subjects from different regions of Peru, aged 18 to 65. Then, a semi-confirmatory factor analysis was performed by means of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and an objective matrix with Procrustes rotation to identify the hypothesized dimensions. All nine dimensions hypothesized by previous studies were found to have favorable factor congruence coefficients (FCC-total &gt;.85), adequate factor saturations (λ &gt;.30), acceptable to high internal consistency alpha, omega, and ordinal alpha coefficients (&gt;.70), and satisfactory goodness-of-fit (RMSEA = 0.004, RMSR = 0.021, FCC = 0.99, GFI = 1.000). Likewise, the validity in relation to other instruments such as the DASS-21 and the LOT-R reports Pearson correlation coefficients with medium and large effect sizes (r =.30 and r =.50) in their dimensions. The SA-45 is a theoretically and psychometrically supported instrument for use in young and adult populations.

Why do employees attend work sick? The assessment and relevance of opposite presenteeism motivations

AbstractPresenteeism, the act of attending work while sick, has gained significant research attention. However, the motivations driving this behaviour remain underexplored. This study seeks to contribute to this area by developing and validating a measurement tool that captures two distinct motivations for presenteeism: voluntary, stemming from personal choice, and involuntary, resulting from external pressures. Across four studies involving 1021 respondents from both the general working population and contexts known for high levels of presenteeism, the reliability and validity of an 8‐item presenteeism motivation scale were established. Studies 1 and 2 confirmed the scale's two‐factor structure and reliability. Study 3 further demonstrated its convergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity, as well as its ability to detect anticipated sex differences in presenteeism tendencies. Study 4 provided evidence towards criterion related validity, showing differential effects on employee well‐being over time. Voluntarily presenteeism was associated with higher levels of work engagement and lower burnout rates, while involuntary presenteeism exhibited the opposite pattern. Additionally, the scale demonstrated measurement invariance across different working populations. The theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.