e18529 Background: Contemporary prognostic models for myelofibrosis (MF) risk stratify patients using a heterogeneous composition of clinical and genetic factors. Little is known regarding how these scores perform in underserved populations. Our study assesses how well current models stratify risk at an inner-city tertiary care center which carries unique challenges including increased diversity, later disease presentation, and less access to healthcare resources. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 88 MF patients referred to our center in the Bronx, NY between 2000 and 2023. Clinical and genetic data were used to calculate prognostic scoring for DIPSS, DIPSS plus, MIPSS70, MIPSSV2, and GIPSS. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis and non-deceased patients were censored at last follow-up. Patients with missing clinical or genetic data were excluded from individual analysis. Models were assessed via univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards analysis followed by concordance analysis. Results: Mean age of the cohort was 66 years (range 29-88) with median survival of 7.7 years. Ethnicities included non-hispanic white (NHW) [30 (34.1%)], NH black [23 (26.1%)], NH asian [6 (6.8%)], and hispanics of all races [22 (25%)] (unknown n=7). DIPSS (n= 88, HR 1.77, CI 1.22 - 2.41, p-value = 0.0001), DIPSS plus (n=83, HR 1.54, 1.15-2.07, p = 0.0033), MIPSS70V2 (n=68, HR 2.06, CI 1.23 - 3.61, p = 0.0088), and GIPSS (n=69, HR 2.73, CI 1.24 - 3.78, p = 0.0063) were significantly associated with OS based on univariate analyses. Both DIPSS and GIPSS were significant even upon adjustment for each other (p=.009 and p=.043 respectively). MIPSS70 (n=73, HR 1.87, CI .93 - 3.88, p = 0.0842) did not meet significance. In terms of predictive accuracy based on C-index scores, DIPSS and GIPSS combined analysis scored highest (0.773), followed by GIPSS (.7226), DIPSS (0.719), MIPSSV2 (0.717), DIPSS Plus (0.6495), then MIPSS70 (0.6414). Conclusions: Our study shows that GIPSS, DIPSS, DIPSS plus, MIPSSV2 all function as valid prognostic models in the inner-city setting and that integrating both clinical and genetic models may have higher predictive value than either individual model alone. Additionally, GIPSS predicted superior survival outcomes to what was observed in our cohort for higher risk categories, prompting the need for further investigation. [Table: see text]
Read full abstract