Vagus Nerve Stimulation Treatment Research Articles

Magnetic vagus nerve stimulation ameliorates contrast-induced acute kidney injury by circulating plasma exosomal miR-365-3p

BackgroundContrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is manifested by a rapid decline in renal function occurring within 48–72 h in patients exposed to iodinated contrast media (CM). Although intravenous hydration is currently the effective method confirmed to prevent CI-AKI, it has several drawbacks. Some investigations have demonstrated the nephroprotective effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) against kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury, but no direct research has investigated the use of VNS for treating CI-AKI. Additionally, most current VNS treatment applies invasive electrical stimulator implantation, which is largely limited by the complications. Our recent publications introduce the magnetic vagus nerve stimulation (mVNS) system pioneered and successfully used for the treatment of myocardial infarction. However, it remains uncertain whether mVNS can mitigate CI-AKI and its specific underlying mechanisms. Therefore, we herein evaluate the potential therapeutic effects of mVNS on CM-induced nephropathy in rats and explore the underlying mechanisms.ResultsmVNS treatment was found to significantly improve the damaged renal function, including the reduction of elevated serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and urinary N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) with increased urine output. Pathologically, mVNS treatment alleviated the renal tissue structure injury, and suppressed kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) expression and apoptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells. Mechanistically, increased circulating plasma exosomal miR-365-3p after mVNS treatment enhanced the autophagy and reduced CM-induced apoptosis in renal tubular epithelial cells by targeting Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb).ConclusionsIn summary, we demonstrated that mVNS can improve CI-AKI through enhanced autophagy and apoptosis inhibition, which depended on plasma exosomal miR-365-3p. Our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of mVNS for CI-AKI in clinical practice. However, further research is needed to determine the optimal stimulation parameters to achieve the best therapeutic effects.Graphical abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation with a small total charge transfer improves motor behavior and reduces neuroinflammation in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease characterized by the loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). Conventional treatments are ineffective in reversing disease progression. Recently, the therapeutic and rehabilitation potential of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in PD has been explored. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the neuroprotective effects of VNS in a lateral lesioned mice model of PD. Excluding controls, experimental mice received cuff electrode implantation on the left vagus nerve and 6-hydroxydopamine administration into the bilateral striatum. After ten days, electrical stimulation was delivered for 11 consecutive days onto PD animals. Behavioral tests were performed after stimulation. The expression of TH, Iba-1, GFAP, adrenergic receptors and cytokines in the SN and striatum was detected by immunofluorescence or western blotting. The activity of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) was also measured. Our results suggest that VNS improved behavioral performance in rod rotation, open field tests and pole-climbing tests in PD mice, accompanied by a decrease in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the SN and increased TH expression in the striatum. Neuroinflammation-related factors, such as GFAP, Iba-1, TNF-α and IL-1β were also suppressed in PD mice after VNS compared to those without treatment. Furthermore, the proportion of c-Fos-positive noradrenergic neurons in the LC increased when animals received VNS. Additionally, the expression of the adrenergic receptor of α1BR was also upregulated after VNS compared to PD mice. In conclusion, VNS has potential as a novel PD therapy for neuroprotective effects, and indicate that activation of norepinephric neurons in LC may plays an important role in VNS treatment for PD.

One-year seizure freedom and quality of life in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy receiving adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in Japan.

Amount of seizure-free days is a critical determinant of quality of life (QoL) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The fractions of patients experiencing prolonged periods of seizure freedom with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have yet to be assessed on a large scale. Retrospective analysis of patients in the Japanese VNS prospective observational registry who experienced at least 1 year of seizure freedom from all seizures, focal seizures, or tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), as well as patient-reported change in QoL in these groups. The study included 362 patients with DRE, 147 were female (40.6%), and the median age at VNS implant was 23.0 years (range: 1.0-73.0). A total of 225 patients reported focal seizures and 184 patients reported TCS. After 36 months of adjunctive VNS, the cumulative proportion of patients experiencing at least 1 year of complete seizure freedom was 11% (38/356) with an average duration of seizure freedom of 19.4 months. In patients with focal seizures, 25% (n = 57/225) experienced at least 1 year of freedom from focal seizures with an average duration of 24.8 months. Higher cumulative rates of freedom from TCS were observed: 55% (n = 101/184) experienced at least 1 year without TCS with an average duration of TCS-free periods of 28.9 months. 82.1% of patients with 12-month complete seizure freedom reported markedly improved or improved QoL compared with 51.9% of patients who were not seizure-free. QoL changes in patients with 12-month seizure freedom from TCS and focal seizures were similar: 61.8% and 63% of respective patients reported either markedly improved or improved QoL at 36 months. Complete seizure freedom is rare in patients treated with VNS; however, this analysis found approximately half of patients who experienced TCS prior to VNS experienced prolonged periods of freedom from TCS with adjunctive VNS. We studied patients in Japan with epilepsy that is difficult to treat. To understand if adding vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) helps such patients, we looked at which patients stopped having all seizures or stopped having a specific seizure type (such as tonic-clonic seizures or focal seizures), and how long these periods lasted. With VNS treatment, about 2 out of 4 patients with tonic-clonic seizures and 1 out of 4 patients with focal seizures had more time without these seizure types. Without seizures, patients felt better about their daily lives. Even patients who still had seizures felt better about their daily lives after 3 years of VNS treatment. The clinical trial registry number is UMIN000014728.

Association of reductions in rescue medication requirements with vagus nerve stimulation: Results of long-term community collected data from a seizure diary app

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on quality of life contributors such as rescue medications. MethodsUsing the seizure diary application SeizureTracker™ database, we examined trends in rescue administration frequency before and after the first recorded VNS magnet swipe in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who had 1) At least one VNS magnet swipe recorded in the diary, and 2) Recorded usage of a benzodiazepine rescue medication (RM) within 90 days prior to the first swipe. A paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to assess changes in RM usage frequency between 30-, 60-, 90-, 180- and 360-day intervals beginning 30 days after first magnet swipe. Longitudinal changes in RM usage frequency were assessed with a generalized estimating equation model. ResultsWe analyzed data of 95 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Median baseline seizure frequency was 8.3 seizures per month, with median baseline rescue medication usage frequency of 2.1 administrations per month (SD 3.3). Significant reductions in rescue medication usage were observed in the 91 to 180 day interval after first VNS magnet swipe, and at 181 to 360 days and at 361 to 720 days, with the magnitude of reduction increasing over time. Decreases in rescue medication usage were sustained when controlling for patients who did not record rescue medication use after the first VNS magnet swipe (N=91). Significant predictors of reductions in rescue medication included baseline frequency of rescue medication usage and time after first VNS magnet swipe. SignificanceThis retrospective analysis suggests that usage of rescue medications is reduced following the start of VNS treatment in patients with epilepsy, and that the magnitude of reduction may progressively increase over time.

Role of vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

ABSTRACT Introduction and purpose: Epilepsy affects 1% globally, with 2.6 to 6 million cases in Europe. 30-40% of the 50 million epilepsy patients globally don't respond to drugs. For those ineligible for surgery, Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) therapy offers an alternative for drug-resistant epilepsy and major depression. A brief description of the state of knowledge: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is a modern therapy using implanted or non-invasive devices to regulate nerve activity with controlled electrical impulses. Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is effective for focal seizures, including simple partial seizures and auras. It also shows promise in reducing seizures in generalized tonic-clonic seizures and benefits patients with epileptic encephalopathies like Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. VNS effectively decreases both the frequency and duration of seizures in individuals contending with intractable epilepsy. The use of vagus nerve stimulation is generally a safe and well-tolerated form of treatment. VNS therapy improves psychomotor functions in patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, showing positive effects on cognitive aspects. The precise mechanism through which VNS affects the body is not fully understood, but it has demonstrated effectiveness, especially in cases of drug-resistant epilepsy. Conclusions: Extensive research backs Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) as an effective palliative for intractable epilepsy, reducing seizures. Yet, identifying specific patients who would benefit most from VNS treatment lacks clear criteria. Neuromodulation remains crucial for healthcare professionals handling drug-resistant epilepsy.

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in the Pediatric Population and Correlation Between Family and Treatment Team Perspectives: Single-center Experience.

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive therapy to pharmacological treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of VNS therapy for seizure frequency reduction and improving quality of life (QOL) measures in children with refractory epilepsy and to evaluate the correlation between the perspectives of families and those of the treating team. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at Abha Maternity and Children's Hospital, Saudi Arabia, from 2018 to 2022. A total of 21 pediatric patients who completed one year of follow-up after VNS implantation were included. Patients were aged between 2 and 14 years, with a mean age of 8.14 ± 3.92; 11 (52.4%) patients were female. Family and physician assessments were collected blinded to each other using Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scores and QOL assessments to evaluate the correlation between the families' and treating team's perspectives on VNS outcomes. In this study involving 21 patients with intractable epilepsy, VNS showed significant efficacy in reducing the frequency of seizures. VNS significantly reduced the number of seizures per week from a baseline median of 35 to a median of 0.25 at the end of the follow-up period, representing a dramatic reduction of 99.3% (p < 0.001). The number of emergency department visits per year decreased from a baseline median of 12 to a median of 2, a reduction of 83.3% (p < 0.001), whereas the number of hospital admissions per year decreased from a baseline median of 3 to a median of 1, a 66.7% decrease (p < 0.001). The number of antiepileptic medications taken decreased from a median of 4 to 3 (p < 0.001). Notably, 28.57% of the patients achieved complete seizure freedom, and 38% exhibited significant improvement, with at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Importantly, none of the patients experienced an escalation in seizure frequency following VNS treatment. The family and physician assessments showed varying degrees of alignment in perceptions, with "concentration" exhibiting a significant positive correlation (r = 0.498, p = 0.022), indicating noteworthy agreement, whereas verbal communication did not show a substantial correlation (r = -0.062, p = 0.791), indicating a divergence of views. VNS is a promising and well-tolerated therapy for individuals with intractable seizures, offering clinical benefits and potential enhancements in various aspects of QOL. The varying perceptions between family and physician assessments highlight the importance of considering multiple perspectives when evaluating treatment outcomes.

Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of treatment-refractory epilepsy

About 40 % of new-onset epilepsy is drug refractory. If epilepsy surgery is not an option or fails, vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can be considered. VNS efficacy is reported as more than 50 % seizure frequency reduction in 50-56 % of patients. Features in the newer models offer additional treatment optimization possibilities. Side effects include hoarseness, cough, and dyspnoea. Caution is advised for patients with sleep apnoea or lung disease. VNS has specific limitations concerning MRI. This review presents an overview of VNS treatment in Denmark and discusses future challenges.

Long-Term Immunomodulatory Impact of VNS on Peripheral Cytokine Profiles and Its Relationship with Clinical Response in Difficult-to-Treat Depression (DTD).

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) represents a long-term adjunctive treatment option in patients with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). Anti-inflammatory effects have been discussed as a key mechanism of action of VNS. However, long-term investigations in real-world patients are sparse. In this naturalistic observational study, we collected data on cytokines in peripheral blood in n = 6 patients (mean age 47.8) with DTD and VNS treatment at baseline and at 6 months follow-up. We have identified clusters of peripheral cytokines with a similar dynamic over the course of these 6 months using hierarchical clustering. We have investigated cytokine changes from baseline to 6 months as well as the relationship between the cytokine profile at 6 months and long-term response at 12 months. After 6 months of VNS, we observed significant correlations between cytokines (p < 0.05) within the identified three cytokine-pairs which were not present at baseline: IL(interleukin)-6 and IL-8; IL-1β and TNF-α; IFN-α2 and IL-33. At 6 months, the levels of all the cytokines of interest had decreased (increased in non-responders) and were lower (5-534 fold) in responders to VNS than in non-responders: however, these results were not statistically significant. VNS-associated immunomodulation might play a role in long-term clinical response to VNS.

Vagus nerve stimulation as a promising neuroprotection for ischemic stroke via α7nAchR-dependent inactivation of microglial NLRP3 inflammasome.

Ischemic stroke is a major cause of disability and death worldwide, and its management requires urgent attention. Previous studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) exerts neuroprotection in ischemic stroke by inhibiting neuroinflammation and apoptosis. In this study, we evaluated the timing for VNS intervention in ischemic stroke, and the underlying mechanisms ofVNS-induced neuroprotection. Mice were subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) for 60 min. The left vagus nerve at cervical level was exposed and attached to an electrode connected to a low-frequency electrical stimulator. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was given for 60 min before, during and after tMCAO (Pre-VNS, Dur-VNS, Post-VNS). Neurological function was assessed 24 h after reperfusion. We found that all the three VNS significantly protected against the tMCAO-induced injury evidenced by improved neurological function and reduced infarct volume. Moreover, the Pre-VNS was the most effective against the ischemic injury. We found that tMCAO activated microglia in the ischemic core and penumbra regions of the brain, followed by the NLRP3 inflammasome activation-induced neuroinflammation, which finally triggered neuronal death. VNS treatment preserved α7nAChR expression in the penumbra regions, inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome activation and ensuing neuroinflammation, rescuing cerebral neurons. The role of α7nAChR in microglial NLRP3 inflammasome activation in ischemic stroke was further validated using genetic manipulations, including Chrna7 knockout mice and microglial Chrna7 overexpression mice, as well as pharmacological interventions using the α7nAChR inhibitor methyllycaconitine and agonist PNU-282987. Collectively, this study demonstrates the potential of VNS as a safe and effective strategy to treat ischemic stroke, and presents a new approach targeting microglial NLRP3 inflammasome, which might be therapeutic for other inflammation-related diseases.

A retrospective, naturalistic study of deep brain stimulation and vagal nerve stimulation in young patients.

Invasive neuromodulation interventions such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) are important treatments for movement disorders and epilepsy, but literature focused on young patients treated with DBS and VNS is limited. This retrospective study aimed to examine naturalistic outcomes of VNS and DBS treatment of epilepsy and dystonia in children, adolescents, and young adults. We retrospectively assessed patient demographic and outcome data that were obtained from electronic health records. Two researchers used the Clinical Global Impression scale to retrospectively rate the severity of neurologic and psychiatric symptoms before and after patients underwent surgery to implant DBS electrodes or a VNS device. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to examine clinical effects. Data from 73 patients were evaluated. Neurologic symptoms improved for patients treated with DBS and VNS (p<.001). Patients treated with DBS did not have a change in psychiatric symptoms, whereas psychiatric symptoms worsened for patients treated with VNS (p=.008). The frequency of postoperative complications did not differ between VNS and DBS groups. Young patients may have distinct vulnerabilities for increased psychiatric symptoms during treatment with invasive neuromodulation. Child and adolescent psychiatrists should consider a more proactive approach and greater engagement with DBS and VNS teams that treat younger patients.

Analysis of factors influencing the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in children and prediction model for efficacy evaluation.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been widely used in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in children. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of VNS, focusing on factors that can influence the efficacy of VNS, and construct a prediction model for the efficacy of VNS in the treatment of DRE children. Retrospectively analyzed 45 DRE children who underwent VNS at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from June 2016 to November 2022. A ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was defined as responder, logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze factors affecting the efficacy of VNS, and a predictive model was constructed. The predictive model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analyses (DCA). A total of 45 DRE children were included in this study, and the frequency of seizures was significantly reduced after VNS treatment, with 25 responders (55.6%), of whom 6 (13.3%) achieved seizure freedom. There was a significant improvement in the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (15.5%) and Seizure Severity Score (46.2%). 16 potential factors affecting the efficacy of VNS were included, and three statistically significant positive predictors were ultimately screened: shorter seizure duration, focal seizure, and absence of intellectual disability. We developed a nomogram for predicting the efficacy of VNS in the treatment of DRE children. The ROC curve confirmed that the predictive model has good diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.864, P < 0.05), and the nomogram can be further validated by bootstrapping for 1,000 repetitions, with a C-index of 0.837. Besides, this model showed good fitting and calibration and positive net benefits in decision curve analysis. VNS is a safe and effective treatment for DRE children. We developed a predictive nomogram for the efficacy of VNS, which provides a basis for more accurate selection of VNS patients.

The experience of applying vagus nerve stimulation in treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy

The article presents a clinical case of adult patient with pharmacoresistant epilepsy lacking focal cerebral morphological changes, who was surgically implanted with a vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) system. The results of 6 months-long treatment were analyzed. In addition, available publications were reviewed to evaluate effectiveness of the VNS system in different patient groups. Current clinical case was featured with significant positive dynamics revealed by regression of epileptic seizures and no recorded epileptiform activity based on electroencephalography during VNS stimulation. In the absence of morphological cerebral focal changes in adult patients, installation of the VNS system is an effective and safe method to control pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on the quality of sleep and sleep apnea in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review.

The objective was to systematically evaluate the current evidence surrounding the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on quality of sleep and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among patients with epilepsy. A literature search was conducted using the Embase and MEDLINE databases. Studies were included if they involved patients with drug-resistant epilepsy treated with VNS and used validated tools to report on quality of sleep or sleep apnea. The literature search yielded 112 citations related to VNS and sleep quality, and 82 citations related to sleep apnea. Twelve articles were included in the review, of which five measured quality of sleep among patients who underwent VNS, six studies measured sleep apnea, and one study measured both outcomes. Studies measuring quality of sleep used different methods, including sleep quality questionnaires and the percentage of sleep in each cycle. Studies also varied in patient populations, the use of control groups, and whether multiple measurements were taken for each patient. Some studies found improved sleep quality after VNS, whereas others found reductions in deep sleep stages. Additionally, mixed results in sleep quality were found when comparing patients with epilepsy who received VNS treatment versus patients with epilepsy who did not receive VNS treatment. Variables such as VNS intensity and age could potentially confound quality of sleep. Studies measuring sleep apnea consistently found increased proportions of patients diagnosed with OSA or increased sleep index scores after VNS implantation. Overall, the effect of VNS on quality of sleep remains unclear, as studies were very heterogeneous, although the effect on sleep apnea has consistently shown an increase in sleep apnea severity indices after VNS implantation. Future studies with consistent measures and discussions of confounding are required to determine the effect of VNS on quality of sleep, and the effect of VNS parameters should be further explored among patients who develop sleep apnea.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Relives Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the Associated Depression via α7nAChR-mediated Anti-inflammatory Pathway.

The present study is designed to investigate the role of vagus nerve in the treatments of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and the associated central nervous system disorders. An IBS animal model was established by giving acetic acid and chronic-acute stress (AA-CAS) treatment in adult male Wistar rats. Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy (SDV) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) were performed to intervene the excitability of vagus nerve. Permeability of blood brain barrier (BBB) was measured and agonist and antagonist of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) were used to explore the relevant mechanisms. AA-CAS treatment resulted in abnormal fecal output, increased visceral sensitivity, depressive-like behaviors, and overexpression of inflammatory mediators, all of which were reversed by VNS treatment. The effects of VNS could also be observed when α7nAChR agonist was applied. Whereas α7nAChR antagonist (methyllycaconitine, MLA) reversed VNS's effects. Interestingly, VNS also reduced the increased permeability of blood brain barrier (BBB) following AA-CAS treatment in IBS rats. SDV treatment only show temporary efficacy on AA-CAS-induced symptoms and had no effect on the permeability of BBB. The intestinal abnormalities and depressive symptoms in IBS rats can be improved by VNS treatment. This positive effect of VNS was achieved through α7nAChR-mediated inflammatory pathway and may also be associated with the decreased of BBB permeability.

Vagus nerve stimulation-induced stromal cell-derived factor-l alpha participates in angiogenesis and repair of infarcted hearts.

We aim to explore the role and mechanism of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in coronary endothelial cells and angiogenesis in infarcted hearts. Seven days after rat myocardial infarction (MI) was prepared by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the left cervical vagus nerve was treated with electrical stimulation 1h after intraperitoneal administration of the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine inhibitor mecamylamine or the mAChR inhibitor atropine or 3days after local injection of Ad-shSDF-1α into the infarcted heart. Cardiac tissue acetylcholine (ACh) and serum ACh, tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels were detected by ELISA to determine whether VNS was successful. An inflammatory injury model in human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) was established by lipopolysaccharide and identified by evaluating TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 levels and tube formation. Immunohistochemistry staining was performed to evaluate CD31-positive vessel density and stromal cell-derived factor-l alpha (SDF-1α) expression in the MI heart in vivo and the expression and distribution of SDF-1α, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 and CXCR7 in HCAECs in vitro. Western blotting was used to detect the levels of SDF-1α, V-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT), phosphorylated AKT (pAKT), specificity protein 1 (Sp1) and phosphorylation of Sp1 in HCAECs. Left ventricular performance, including left ventricular systolic pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and rate of the rise and fall of ventricular pressure, should be evaluated 28days after VNS treatment. VNS was successfully established for MI therapy with decreases in serum TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 levels and increases in cardiac tissue and serum ACh levels, leading to increased SDF-1α expression in coronary endothelial cells of MI hearts, triggering angiogenesis of MI hearts with increased CD31-positive vessel density, which was abolished by the m/nAChR inhibitors mecamylamine and atropine or knockdown of SDF-1α by shRNA. ACh promoted SDF-1α expression and its distribution along with the branch of the formed tube in HCAECs, resulting in an increase in the number of tubes formed in HCAECs. ACh increased the levels of pAKT and phosphorylation of Sp1 in HCAECs, resulting in inducing SDF-1α expression, and the specific effects could be abolished by mecamylamine, atropine, the PI3K/AKT blocker wortmannin or the Sp1 blocker mithramycin. Functionally, VNS improved left ventricular performance, which could be abolished by Ad-shSDF-1α. VNS promoted angiogenesis to repair the infarcted heart by inducing SDF-1α expression and redistribution along new branches during angiogenesis, which was associated with the m/nAChR-AKT-Sp1 signalling pathway.

Vagus Nerves Stimulation: Clinical Implication and Practical Issue as a Neuropsychiatric Treatment.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been approved as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy and depression. As the progress of VNS treatment for these neuropsychiatric disorders continues, its applications have expanded to a wide range of conditions, including inflammatory diseases to cognitive dysfunctions. The branches of the vagal nerves directly or indirectly innervate the anatomical structures implicated in these neuropsychiatric conditions, which has led to promising results regarding the effectiveness of VNS. Previous studies investigating the effectiveness of VNS have mostly utilized invasive forms of stimulation. However, current preclinical and clinical research indicates that non-invasive forms of VNS, such as transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, hold the promise for treating various neuropsychiatric conditions. This review aims to delve into relevant clinical studies of VNS in various illness states, different methods of VNS, and the potential mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects in these neuropsychiatric conditions.

1019 New onset OSA after long term Vagus Nerve Stimulator implantation in a patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A case report

Abstract Introduction Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established treatment for drug resistant epilepsy. New onset obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a rare side effect of VNS. There are few studies describing VNS induced sleep apnea in adults. [1-2] A study of 16 patients with drug-refractory epilepsy found 5 patients with normal AHI develop mild OSA after VNS treatment for 3 months. [2] However, no literature exists regarding OSA after long term VNS implantation. Untreated OSA in patients with epilepsy can impact epilepsy outcomes. We report a case of new onset OSA after long term VNS implantation, refractory to PAP therapy. Report of case(s) A 36 year-old man with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome presented with gasping during sleep and daytime hypersomnolence. He underwent VNS implantation at the age of 12. A prior PSG in 2018 showed no sleep apnea. Repeat PSG showed VNS-induced OSA (AHI 10.1/hour). After failed CPAP titration, BPAP-S at 25/16 cm H2O improved OSA. Review of therapy data on follow up showed AHI of 13.7/hour and CAI of 10.9/hour, which is concerning for treatment induced central sleep apnea on BPAP. Diagnostic study with VNS turned off revealed mild OSA (AHI 5.8/hour). A multidisciplinary approach involving ENT for drug-induced sleep endoscopy to optimize VNS stimulation parameters along with neurology and sleep involvement is planned. The optimized VNS setting could be used during planned sleep times using a VNS device with dual-programming capability. Conclusion To our knowledge, there is no literature on development of sleep apnea after long term VNS implantation. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, VNS can cause sleep apnea or worsen sleep apnea in patients with a preexisting diagnosis. [1] This case demonstrates need for continuous monitoring and screening for sleep apnea in patients who have been implanted with VNS, even if baseline and follow up PGSs are normal. Current literature suggests discontinuation of VNS to resolve VNS-induced OSA, but we describe a case here where VNS is needed for ongoing management of epilepsy. Further studies are needed to identify treatment options for patients that cannot discontinue VNS therapy who also cannot be successfully treated with PAP if they develop VNS-induced OSA. Support (if any)

Safety of vagus nerve stimulation and responsive neurostimulation used in combination for multifocal and generalized onset epilepsy in pediatric patients.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of combined active responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapies in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients implanted with the RNS System with a concomitant active VNS System (VNS+RNS) between 2015 and 2021. Patients with at least 1 month of overlapping concomitant VNS and RNS treatment were included. Patients who had an RNS device implanted after 21 years of age, those who had responsive neurostimulators implanted after their VNS was inactivated, or those in whom the VNS battery died and was not replaced before RNS System implantation were excluded. Seven pediatric VNS+RNS patients were identified, and their courses of treatment were evaluated. All patients tolerated concurrent VNS and RNS treatment well, no device-device interactions were identified, and no major treatment-related adverse effects were noted. The median follow-up after RNS System implantation was 1.2 years. By electroclinical criteria, all 7 patients achieved 75%-99% reductions in the frequency of disabling seizures after RNS System implantation. By patient and caregiver report, 2 patients (28.6%) had 75%-99% reductions in the frequency of their disabling seizures, 2 patients (28.6%) achieved 50%-74% reductions, 2 patients achieved 1%-24% reduction in frequency of disabling seizures, and 1 patient (14.3%) experienced a 1%-24% increase in seizure frequency. The available VNS magnet swipe data identified 2 patients with 75%-99% reductions in seizure frequency as measured by magnet swipes, one with 25%-49% reductions and the other with 1%-24% increases in seizure frequency as measured by magnet swipes. This study demonstrated that RNS and VNS therapies can safely be used simultaneously in pediatric patients. RNS may potentially augment the therapeutic effects of VNS treatment. Patients in whom a response to VNS has been suboptimal should still be considered for RNS therapy.

Anti-inflammatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

The neural control of the immune system by the nervous system is critical to maintaining immune homeostasis, whose disruption may be an underlying cause of several diseases, including cancer, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Alzheimer's disease. Here we studied the role of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Vagus nerve stimulation is widely used as an alternative treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Thus, we studied the impact that VNS treatment has on PBMCs isolated from a cohort of existing patients with medically refractory epilepsy. A comparison of genome-wide changes in gene expression was made between the epilepsy patients treated and non-treated with vagus nerve stimulation. The analysis showed downregulation of genes related to stress, inflammatory response, and immunity, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect of VNS in epilepsy patients. VNS also resulted in the downregulation of the insulin catabolic process, which may reduce circulating blood glucose. These results provide a potential molecular explanation for the beneficial role of the ketogenic diet, which also controls blood glucose, in treating refractory epilepsy. The findings indicate that direct VNS might be a useful therapeutic alternative to treat chronic inflammatory conditions.

Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation in 95 children of drug-resistant epilepsy with structural etiology

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is one of the treatment options for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). To analyze the efficacy of VNS in children of DRE with structural etiology, we conducted a cohort study including 95 patients of DRE with structural etiology who underwent VNS treatment. Patients were followed up every 3 months at the outpatient department or via a remote programming platform. The median follow-up period was 2.6 years (range 1.0–4.6 years). The respective responder rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up were 40.0% (38/95), 52.6% (50/95), 56.0% (47/84), and 59.7% (37/62). The respective seizure-free rates at 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up were 8.4% (8/95), 9.5% (8/84), and 9.7% (6/62). The patients were divided into four groups based on etiologies: malformations of cortical development (n = 26), post-encephalitic lesions (n = 36), perinatal brain injury lesions (n = 31), and hippocampal sclerosis (n = 2). The respective responder rates at 12 months of follow-up in these groups were 53.8% (14/26), 52.8% (19/36), 51.6% (16/31), and 50.0% (1/2). There were no significant differences in gender, age at onset, age at stimulator implantation, epilepsy duration prior to VNS implantation, number of anti-seizure medications ever tried before VNS treatment, pulse amplitude of VNS, specific structural etiologies, lobe distribution or hemispheric side of structural lesions between responders and non-responders. Of the 95 patients, 8 (8.4%) underwent lesion surgery or hemispherectomy before VNS implantation, and 6/8 (75%) of these patients had a >50% reduction in seizure frequency. One patient who had a corpus callosotomy before VNS implantation had no response to VNS treatment. In conclusion, VNS is an effective treatment in children of DRE with structural etiology. There was no significant difference in VNS efficacy in patients with different structural etiologies. Vagus nerve stimulation treatment may also control seizures well in some patients with poor outcomes after lesion resection or hemispherectomy before VNS implantation.