Vaginal Colpotomy Research Articles

Vaginal colpotomy for traditional and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vaginal procedures

Vaginal colpotomy for traditional and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vaginal procedures

Robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: current trends and controversies.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) is widely performed as a treatment for early-stage cervical cancer. However, in 2018, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) called the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial showed that MIRH had poorer oncologic outcomes compared to laparotomy. Since then, several clinical studies have supported this finding, and most surgeons now perform MIRH with limited surgical indications. However, most of the reported studies evaluated laparoscopic radical hysterectomy rather than robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH). Robotic surgery has advantages for complex surgical procedures in the deep and narrow pelvic cavity in cervical cancer, making it necessary to evaluate the benefits and potential harms of RRH individually. Based on this systematic review, RRH is a safe and effective alternative to abdominal approach for early-stage cervical cancer. RRH offers significant perioperative benefits, including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications, without compromising oncologic outcomes such as overall survival and progression-free survival. Additionally, surgeons should aim to minimize tumor cell spillage into the peritoneal cavity by eliminating the use of uterine manipulators or vaginal colpotomy. Ongoing RCTs will reveal whether we can perform RRH without oncologic compromise in cervical cancer.

Vaginal colpotomy approach for ovarian cystectomy for a mature cystic teratoma

Vaginal colpotomy approach for ovarian cystectomy for a mature cystic teratoma

Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Objective: To investigate the factors affecting the prognosis of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH), and to compare the prognosis and recurrence sites of patients with different colpotomy paths. Methods: The clinical data of 965 patients with stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer who underwent LRH in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from January 2015 to December 2018 were collected. The median age was 47.0 years of all patients with a median follow-up of 62 months (48-74 months). Cox regression was used to perform the univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinicopathological factors associated with the prognosis that included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were categorized into LRH through vaginal colpotomy (VC group, n=475) and LRH through intracorporeal colpotomy (IC group, n=490) according to the colpotomic approaches. The prognosis and recurrence sites of patients in each group were compared. Results: (1) During the follow-up period, 137 cases recurred (14.2%, 137/965) and 98 cases died (10.2%, 98/965). The 5-year DFS and OS were 85.8% and 89.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, positive vaginal margin (PVM) was significantly affected the 5-year OS of patients with cervical cancer (P=0.023), while clinical stage, maximum diameter of tumor, degree of pathological differentiation, lymph node metastasis (LNM), depth of cervical stromal invasion, parametrium involvement, and uterine corpus invasion (UCI) were significantly associated with 5-year DFS and OS in patients with cervical cancer (all P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, clinical stage (HR=1.882, 95%CI: 1.305-2.716), LNM (HR=2.178, 95%CI: 1.483-3.200) and UCI (HR=3.650, 95%CI: 1.906-6.988) were independent risk factors of 5-year DFS (all P<0.001). Clinical stage (HR=2.500, 95%CI: 1.580-3.956), LNM (HR=2.053, 95%CI: 1.309-3.218), UCI (HR=3.984, 95%CI: 1.917-8.280), PVM (HR=3.235, 95%CI: 1.021-10.244) were independent risk factors of 5-year OS (all P<0.05). (2) Different colpotomy paths did not significantly affect the 5-year DFS and OS of patients with stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer. The 5-year DFS in VC group and IC group were 85.9% and 85.6% (P=0.794), and the 5-year OS were 90.8% and 89.3% (P=0.966), respectively. Recurrence patterns consisted of intraperitoneal recurrence, pelvic recurrence, vaginal stump recurrence, and lymph node and distant metastasis. The intraperitoneal recurrence rate of VC group was significantly lower than that of IC group [0.6%(3/468) vs 2.3% (11/485), P=0.037], while the rates of pelvic recurrence, vaginal stump recurrence, lymph node and distant metastasis and overall recurrence were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients with different clinical stages, LNM and UCI showed that statistical differences of the intraperitoneal recurrence rates between two groups were only in patients without LNM (0.5% vs 2.3%, P=0.030) or without UCI (0.7% vs 2.3%, P=0.037). Conclusions: Clinical stage, LNM, PVM and UCI are independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer. For patients without LNM or UCI, LRH through VC could reduce the intraperitoneal recurrence rate, while it is not enough to improve 5-year DFS and OS of patients. Low proportion of intraperitoneal recurrence, intra-operative tumor cells spillage to vagina stump and pelvic cavity might be the explanation.

Spillage and displacement of indocyanine green-stained tissues from uterine cervix to pelvic peritoneum: A proof of concept study for colpotomy approach in minimally invasive surgery

ObjectiveTo analyze peritoneal spillage and displacement of indocyanine green (ICG)-stained tissues from uterine cervix to pelvis during intracorporeal/vaginal colpotomy in laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy. Materials and methodsEleven patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy were included. One patient with an incidental diagnosis of endometrial cancer was excluded. Of the 10 patients, five underwent intracorporeal colpotomy (IC) and five received vaginal colpotomy (VC) during laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy. Approximately 5 cm of resected round ligament from each patient was stained with ICG and cut to 1.0 × 1.0 cm in size. Four to five fragments of ICG-stained tissues were placed and sutured on the uterine cervix before colpotomy. During and after colpotomy, serial pictures under white and fluorescence light were taken to document peritoneal spillage and displacement of ICG-stained tissues to the pelvic peritoneum. ResultsPeritoneal spillage of ICG occurred in the entire IC group. Displacement of ICG-stained tissues from uterine cervix to pelvic peritoneum were visualized in three (60%) patients undergoing IC. In the five patients who received VC, peritoneal spillage of ICG and displacement of ICG-stained tissue to pelvic peritoneum did not occur. There were no perioperative complications. ConclusionsIC in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy should not be performed because peritoneal spillage of ICG and displacement of ICG-stained tissues from uterine cervix to pelvis frequently occurs during IC. Therefore, specific measures to prevent tumor exposure during colpotomy should be implemented in cervical cancer patients.

Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.

This study compared survival outcomes for patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 2009) cervical cancer who underwent open radical hysterectomy (ORH) versus those who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) using vaginal colpotomy (VC).Data for 550 patients who were diagnosed with cervical cancer at our institution during the period August 2005 to September 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 116 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy (RH) were selected after applying the exclusion criteria. All MIRH patients underwent VC. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes between the ORH and MIRH groups were compared using appropriate statistical testing.Ninety one patients were treated with ORH and 25 with MIRH during the study period. Among the MIRH patients, 18 underwent laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and 7 underwent laparoscopic RH. Preoperative conization was performed more frequently in MIRH patients than in ORH patients (44% vs 22%, respectively, P = .028). The incidence of lymph node invasion was higher in the ORH group than in MIRH group (37.4% vs 12.0% respectively; P = .016). Following RH, ORH patients underwent adjuvant treatment more frequently than MIRH patients (71.4% vs 56.0%, respectively, P = .002). There were no significant differences between ORH and MIRH patients for either progression-free survival (PFS) (91.3% vs 78.7%, respectively; P = .220) or 5-year overall survival (OS) (96.6% vs 94.7%, respectively, P = .929). In univariate analysis, lympho-vascular space invasion was the only clinicopathological feature associated with decreased PFS. No other clinicopathological factors was significantly associated with PFS or OS in univariate and multivariate analyses.Despite a higher incidence of unfavorable prognostic factors in ORH patients, their survival outcomes were not different to those of MIRH patients with VC.

Hysterectomy via vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in virgin patients: a first feasibility study

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a minimally invasive, scar-free technique that uses a vaginal colpotomy to access the peritoneal cavity. Hysterectomy via vNOTES has shown to be technically feasible and safe, with shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative pain scores. Moreover, vNOTES adds the advantages of endoscopy to those of vaginal surgery and thereby broadens the indications of a conventional vaginal hysterectomy. Virginity has been contraindicated for vNOTES so far, as vaginal accessibility can be severely reduced in virgin women. Therefore, cases of vNOTES hysterectomy in virgin patients have never been reported in the literature. The objective of this study is to assess the technical feasibility and safety of hysterectomy in virgin women. We performed a retrospective analysis of patient files of all vNOTES hysterectomies performed on virgin women in our centre (Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium) from July 2016 until June 2020 (N = 9). Despite limited vaginal accessibility, vNOTES hysterectomy was successfully performed in all nine patients, without conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy and without clinically relevant complications. In this first IDEAL stage 1 study, vaginal NOTES hysterectomy appears to be technically feasible and safe in virgin women. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging, minimally invasive technique that offers a safe alternative to laparoscopy and open surgery. Besides better cosmetics (scar-free technique), advantages of vNOTES hysterectomy include shorter hospital stay and less postoperative pain compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy. Moreover, vNOTES adds the benefits of endoscopy (visualisation of anatomy) to conventional vaginal hysterectomy. Virginity has been contraindicated for vNOTES so far, because the absence of uterine descent and narrow vagina in virgins is thought to complicate the vaginal approach. Therefore, vNOTES hysterectomy has never been reported in virgin patients. What do the results of this study add? In this study, we are the first to report the feasibility of performing a vNOTES hysterectomy in virgin patients. The results show that, in experienced hands, indications for vNOTES can be broadened and include virgin women. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This first report of vNOTES hysterectomy in virgin patients is only a small but important step in the evaluation of safety and efficacy of this emerging technique. Further research is needed to assess reproducibility of the findings and to carefully determine indications and contraindications of vNOTES.

Repeat Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A First Feasibility Study

Objectives: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive technique in benign gynaecologic surgery whereby surgical access to the peritoneal cavity is achieved through natural orifices, namely through a vaginal colpotomy. Experience in repeat vNOTES cases is limited and so far, repeat vNOTES cases have not been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy in women with a history of previous vNOTES adnexal surgery. Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the first 11 repeat vNOTES cases in our centre. All vNOTES procedures, primary adnexal surgery as well as repeat vNOTES hysterectomy, were performed by one surgeon (J.B.). Materials, Setting, Methods: Between March 2016 and May 2020, 11 patients underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexectomy or cystectomy in Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. Relevant patient characteristics and outcome data were collected after written informed consent. Results: Median age was 49 years (range 44–65) at the moment of the first vNOTES procedure. Two patients had one or more caesarean sections in history, and 2 women were nulliparous. Median interval between primary and repeat vNOTES procedure was 15 months (range 0.8–37 months). All patients underwent a vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) as repeat vNOTES procedure. Performing a colpotomy and entering the peritoneal cavity after prior vNOTES was technically feasible in all cases. All VANHs were successfully performed. There were 3 minor complications after repeat vNOTES, of which one was anaesthesia-related. The 2 complications associated with the surgical procedure were both cystitis. In one of these 2 patients, there were high post-void residues, which were easily managed by bladder training. There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy, neither serious nor life-threatening complications. No ureteric, bladder, or intestinal injuries have occurred. Limitations: The retrospective design and small sample size are the main limitations of this study. Moreover, the follow-up period of the most recently operated patients was too short to draw conclusions on long-term outcomes, including sexual function. Conclusions: In all patients in this case series, vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexal surgery was successfully performed. Large-scale prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of multiple consecutive vNOTES procedures in 1 patient.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and natural orifice surgery extraction/minimal extraction site surgery in the obese.

Despite advantages associated with laparoscopic colorectal surgery, there is significant morbidity associated with incisions required for specimen extraction and restoration of bowel continuity. In laparoscopic colorectal surgery, the length of the longest incision depends upon that required to facilitate extra-corporeal steps. The purpose of this study was to analyse obese patients (body mass index >30 kg/m2 ) who have undergone laparoscopic small bowel or right-sided colonic resection with intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) and natural orifice surgery extraction (NOSE)/minimal extraction site (MES) surgery. A retrospective review of 11 obese patients who have undergone laparoscopic small bowel and right-sided colonic resection with ICA and NOSE/MES was conducted. Mean body mass index was 40.4kg/m2 (range 32.7-56 kg/m2 ) in 11 patients. Procedures performed were laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (7) - one with high anterior resection, pelvic peritonectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and greater omentectomy, small bowel resection (2), transverse colotomy (1) and segmental transverse colectomy (1). All colonic specimens were extracted via NOSE (vaginal colpotomy or transcolonic), except two requiring a miniaturized extraction wound. Small bowel specimens were extracted via a 12-mm port hole, without extension. Mean operating time was 240 min (range 100-510 min). Mean time to discharge was 4 days (range 4-6 days). Complications included a superficial wound infection in a patient presenting with an obstructed tumour and a second patient developed a seroma following small bowel resection for an incarcerated hernia. Obese patients can undergo laparoscopic small bowel and right-sided colonic resection with ICA and NOSE/MES surgery and benefit from short length of stay and low morbidity.

Spillage and displacement of ICG-stained tissue from the uterine cervix to the pelvic peritoneum: A proof of concept study for colpotomic approach in minimally invasive surgery

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze peritoneal spillage and artificial displacement of indocyanine green (ICG)-stained tissues from the uterine cervix to the pelvis during intracorporal and vaginal colpotomy in laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy.

Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.

ObjectiveTo evaluate oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (RH) in early cervical cancer before and after the application of parametrial invasion (PMI) criterion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and vaginal colpotomy (VC).MethodsA total of 216 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB–IIA cervical cancer patients who underwent minimally invasive RH was identified between April 2006 and October 2018. Patients were classified into the pre-PMI intracorporeal or VC (IVC) (n=117) and post-PMI VC groups (n=99). In the pre-PMI IVC group, PMI criterion (intact stromal ring) on MRI was not applied and the patients received IVC. In the post-PMI VC group, surgical candidates were selected using the PMI criterion on MRI and all patients received VC only. Oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors associated with disease recurrence were analyzed.ResultsThe rate of positive vaginal cuff margins in the pre-PMI IVC group was higher than that in the post-PMI VC group (11.1% vs. 1.0%, p=0.003). Two-year disease-free survival was different between the 2 groups (84.5% in pre-PMI IVC vs. 98.0% in post-PMI VC groups, p=0.005). Disrupted stromal ring on MRI (hazard ratio [HR]=20.321; 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.903–84.218; p<0.001) and intracorporeal colpotomy (HR=3.059; 95% CI=1.176–7.958; p=0.022) were associated with recurrence.ConclusionThe intact cervical stromal ring on MRI might identify the low-risk group of patients in terms of PMI and lymphovascular/stromal invasion in early cervical cancer. Minimally invasive RH should be performed in optimal candidates with an intact stromal ring on MRI, using VC.

Is the scar-less hysterectomy with Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) the future of benign gynecological surgery? A Review of the literature

As the tide advances towards minimally invasive surgical approaches which are favourable over open methods in terms of patient analgesia requirements and recovery time, Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has emerged as a technique within gynaecology which uses laparoscopic instruments and methods without the need for abdominal incisions. NOTES surgery has been conducted within gynecology via a vaginal colpotomy to perform procedures such as adnexectomy, hysterectomy, myomectomy and urogynecological procedures. This review summarises the available literature data on NOTES surgery with preliminary results showing reduced postoperative pain, improved cosmesis, and the potential for faster patient recovery and hospital discharge as compared to traditional methods. Larger, more robust data is needed to truly compare the efficacy of gynecological NOTES over traditional methods, however initial literature suggests this may be a promising innovation emerging in the field of gynecology.

Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy after using parametrial invasion criteria on magnetic resonance imaging and vaginal colpotomy

Objective: To evaluate oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (RH) in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients after using parametrial invasion (PMI) criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and vaginal colpotomy (VC).

Sacrospinofixation of Richter in 8 Points: Original Contribution of the Laparoscopic Column in the Visualization of the Sacrospinous Ligaments

Although the standard technique is currently based on laparoscopic promontofixation, the standard vaginal technique for the treatment of uterine prolapse is sacrospinofixation according to Richter [1-3]. Described by Kurt Richter in 1968, this intervention corrects the middle floor and consists of fixing the vaginal dome (after hysterectomy or not) on the sacrospinous ligament(s) [4,5]. The technique includes a wide dissection of the pararectal fossa using several Breisky valves to grip the sacrospinous ligament under strict visual control. This crucial step of the intervention implies optimal visual control for the operator but does not allow visual access to the operative assistants, which is regrettable for the purpose of teaching [2,4-6]. The aim of this surgical video is to describe the different stages of the sacrospinofixation surgical technique, showing sacrospinous ligaments during the crucial step thanks to a laparoscopic camera. A step-by-step explanation of the surgery using a video (an instructive video [Video 1]) approved by the local ethics committee. Gynecological Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. A 70-year-old woman with multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Installation in the conventional gynecologic position with 2 operating assistants on both sides of the operator. The steps are as follows: step 1, posterior colpotomy; step 2, rectovaginal dissection and opening of the pararectal fossa; step 3, dissection of the sacrospinous ligament; and step 4, gripping of the sacrospinous ligament. The following 4 steps are realized bilaterally: step 5, suspension of the vaginal dome; step 6, beginning of vaginal closure; step 7, tightening the spinofixation threads; and step 8, ending the closure of the vaginal colpotomy. The operative time was 60 minutes. The operation was simple and shows precisely the sacrospinous ligaments. There were no intraoperative complications. The vaginal mesh urinary catheter was removed on day 1, and the patient was discharged on day 3. Thanks to a laparoscopic column, this video of the surgical technique of sacrospinofixation using the Richter procedure is an original approach to show sacrospinous ligaments. The latter is a crucial step of this surgery, which remains the reference vaginal technique for the treatment of a uterine prolapse.

722 - Vaginal Approach (Colpotomy and Tumor Extraction) in Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Should be a Preferred Method in Cervical Cancer: A Study of 31 Cases

Objective: To evaluate the recurrence rate and pattern of patients with cervical cancer who had underwent robotic radical hysterectomy through vaginal colpotomy (RRH-V) or robotic radical trachelectomy through vaginal colpotomy (RRT-V). And, other surgical and oncological outcomes were also evaluated.

Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.

This study investigates the pattern of disease recurrence and identifies the clinicopathologic prognostic factors for patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma treated with laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy (LRH/RRH). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 128 patients with FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer. Preoperative examination did not uncover definitive evidence of parametrial invasion or lymph node metastasis in any of the patients; therefore, all patients underwent LRH/RRH with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy between April 2006 and December 2013. Sites of disease recurrence and all possible clinicopathologic factors related to the risk of disease recurrence were determined. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that laparoscopic intracorporeal colpotomy (P < 0.041, odds ratio 7.038, 95% confidence interval 1.059-15.183) represented a strong prognostic factor related to disease recurrence. We categorized the minimally invasive surgery group into LRH through vaginal colpotomy (LRH-VC; 79 patients) and LRH/RRH through intracorporeal colpotomy (LRH/RRH-IC; 49 patients) according to the colpotomic approaches. Disease recurrence was higher in the LRH/RRH-IC group than in the LRH-VC group (16.3% vs 5.1%, P = 0.057), with five patients in the LRH/RRH-IC group experiencing intraperitoneal spreads. Total laparoscopic/robotic intracorporeal colpotomy under CO2 pneumoperitoneum may carry a risk of positive vaginal cuff margin, as well as intraperitoneal tumor spreads in patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with LRH/RRH.

Scarless hepatectomy: natural orifice specimen extraction after left lateral sectionectomy

BackgroundThe use of laparoscopy in liver surgery is well established and considered as the gold standard for small resections. The laparoscopic resections have lower morbidity and better cosmetic results, but still require an incision to remove the surgical specimen. The possibility of remove the specimen through natural orifices and avoid an abdominal incision may further improve the benefits offered by minimally invasive procedures.AimTo describe the technique of transvaginal extraction of the specimen after laparoscopic liver left lateral sectionectomy.MethodThe laparoscopic liver resection is performed in a standard fashion. After completing the resection, the specimen is placed into a retrieval plastic bag. To perform de extraction, a vaginal colpotomy is performed, guided by a 12 mm trocar introduced through the vagina. Then the extraction bag is removed pulling the bag through the extended incision in the posterior wall of the vagina. After the extraction, the colpotomy incision is closed laparoscopically.ResultsThis technique was performed in a 74-year-old woman with a 3 cm lesion between liver segments 2 and 3. She had a fast and uneventful recovery.ConclusionThis technique appears to be feasible, safe and avoid the complications of an abdominal incision.

A simple procedure to prevent chronic vaginal colpotomy wound bleeding after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Objective To determine whether injecting the colpotomy wound with diluted vasopressin decreases vaginal bleeding after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). Methods In this prospective controlled study 100 patients who underwent LAVH from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2007, were randomized to receive an injection of vasopressin (n = 50) or normal saline (n = 50) solution in the colpotomy wound. Results In the vasopressin group, bleeding from the colpotomy wound occurred for more than 7 days in 9 patients (18%), and none was bleeding after 1 month; in the control group, the corresponding values were 29 (58%) and 2 (4%). Compared with the study group, the control group had a significantly higher rate of chronic bleeding from the colpotomy wound for more than 7 days and for more than 14 days after LAVH ( P < 0.001 for both). Conclusion Infiltrating the colpotomy wound with diluted vasopressin was found to prevent chronic vaginal bleeding, which frequently occurs following LAVH.