Cost-effectiveness Of Vaccination Research Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Maternal Vaccination to Prevent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Illness.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) commonly causes hospitalization among US infants. A maternal vaccine preventing RSV in infants, RSV bivalent prefusion F maternal vaccine (RSVpreF), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Our objective was to evaluate the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of vaccinating pregnant persons in the United States using RSVpreF. We simulated RSV infection and disease with and without seasonal RSVpreF vaccination in half of the pregnant persons in the annual US birth cohort during weeks 32 through 36 of gestation. Model inputs came from peer-reviewed literature, Food and Drug Administration records, and epidemiological surveillance databases. The results are reported using a societal perspective in 2022 US dollars for a 1-year time frame, discounting future health outcomes and costs at 3%. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. Year-round maternal vaccination with RSVpreF would prevent 45 693 outpatient visits, 15 866 ED visits, and 7571 hospitalizations among infants each year. Vaccination had a societal incremental cost of $396 280 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. Vaccination from September through January cost $163 513 per QALY saved. The most influential inputs were QALYs lost from RSV disease, the cost of the vaccine, and RSV-associated hospitalization costs; changes in these inputs yielded outcomes ranging from cost-saving to $800 000 per QALY saved. Seasonal maternal RSV vaccination designed to prevent RSV lower respiratory tract infection in infants may be cost-effective, particularly if administered to pregnant persons immediately before or at the beginning of the RSV season.

Public health and economic impact of COVID-19 vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, KP.2, among adults in 2024/2025 in the United States

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the public health and economic impact of vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, KP.2, in 2024/2025 in the United States. Methods A combined cohort Markov-decision tree model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of vaccination versus no vaccination in adults aged ≥18 years. The adult population was further stratified into 18-64 years and ≥65 years age groups. Public health surveillance data informed the annual proportion of individuals infected with and vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and the proportion of those infected who were hospitalized, stratified by age. Other age-stratified clinical, cost, and vaccine effectiveness parameters were informed by literature. The budget impact analysis was based on a hypothetical 1-million-member plan and used a payer perspective. Parameter uncertainty was tested in sensitivity analyses. Results Without vaccination, the model projected 21.4 million new symptomatic cases, 15,793 deaths, 629,098 hospitalizations, $115.5 billion in total costs, and 1 million QALYs lost among adults aged ≥18 years, with the greatest health burden observed among older adults aged ≥65 years (72% of hospitalizations and 86% of deaths) and the greatest economic burden in adults aged 18 to 64 years (62% of total costs). Vaccination was projected to prevent 915,501 cases, 1,057 deaths, and 37,489 hospitalizations, resulting in cost savings of $513 million, 9,173 LYs gained, 56,482 QALYs gained, and a dominant ICER. In the budget impact analysis, vaccination was estimated to result in total incremental cost savings for the population aged ≥ 65 years and a modest budget increase for the population aged 18 to 64 years. Conclusions Vaccination with the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, KP.2, is a cost-effective measure from the societal perspective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 that could reduce the health and economic burden of COVID-19.

Phase II study on the safety and immunogenicity of single-dose intramuscular or intranasal administration of the AVX/COVID-12 “Patria” recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine as a heterologous booster against COVID-19 in Mexico

BackgroundThe global inequity in the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines underscores the urgent need for innovative and cost-effective vaccine technologies to address access disparities and implement local manufacturing capabilities. This is essential for achieving and sustaining widespread immunity, and for ensuring timely protection of vulnerable populations during future booster campaigns in lower- middle income countries (LMICs). MethodsTo address this need, we conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the locally manufactured AVX/COVID-12 “Patria” (AVX) vaccine as a booster dose. The vaccine was administered either intramuscularly (IM) or intranasally (IN) to participants who had previously completed a vaccination regimen for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using adenoviral vector, inactivated virus, or mRNA-based vaccines. Participants with initial anti-spike IgG titers below 1,200 U/mL were included, allowing us to observe the booster effect induced by vaccination. ResultsBoth IM and IN immunization with AVX were found to be safe and well-tolerated. The vaccine induced a significant (>2.5-fold) increase in neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral Wuhan strain and variants of concern (VOCs), including Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron (BA.2 and BA.5). This immune response was further supported by increased cellular production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), demonstrating a robust and multifaceted immune reaction. ConclusionsThe administration of AVX as a booster dose, whether through IM or IN routes, was safe and well-tolerated. The vaccine extended immune responses not only against the ancestral Wuhan-1 strain but also against various VOCs. Its ability to enhance preexisting immune responses suggests a potential contribution to expanding and sustaining herd immunity within the population.

Estimation of the girls cost vaccination against human papillomavirus in the Siberian Federal District

Background. The non-declining cervical cancer incidence in the Siberian Federal District 16.30/0000 (in Russia - 13.80 /0000) necessitate preventive vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV).Aim. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in girls aged 9-14 years in the Siberian Federal District as a whole and in the context of subjects with a 60, 80, 90 percent target cohort.Materials and methods. We studied the size of the female population aged 9-14 years in the constituent entities of the Siberian Federal District for 2022, the average total cost of the vaccine, information on the gross regional product per capita, form C51 “Distribution of deaths by gender, age groups and causes of death” of Tomsk region, 2022. Age-standardized rate per 100,000 population of morbidity and detection (in percentages) of pre-invasive cervix cancer (carcinoma in situ) in the Siberian Federal District were calculated per 100 newly diagnosed malignant cervix neoplasms in 2022.Results. In the Irkutsk, Tomsk regions, Altai and Krasnoyarsk territories age-standardized rate (16.6; 17.8; 16.3; 18.90 /0000, respectively), the detection rate of pre-invasive cancer was 48.0-82.4 %, which indicates on the effectiveness of measures for early cervical cancer diagnosis. In the Republics of Tyva, Altai, Khakassia, age-standardized rate (26.4; 20.1; 19.30 /0000, respectively), cancer in situ was diagnosed in 8.2-23.6 % of cases, which indicates an insufficient level and defects in the organization preventive examinations in medical institutions. In the first year of vaccination against HPV with 60 % coverage of a girls cohort 9-14 years old (n = 404,943), 9.3 billion rubles will be required, with 80 % coverage (539,924 girls) - more than 12.4 billion rubles, with 90 % coverage (607,415 girls) - more than 13.9 billion rubles for primary vaccination against HPV. In subsequent years, more than 2.5-2.8 billion rubles will be required annually. Over 5 years, with 90 % coverage of the population, the financial costs of vaccination will be (817.8 million rubles), and the subsequent 4 annual investments (163.6 million rubles per year). The economic damage caused by mortality from cervical cancer in the Tomsk region over five years (2018-2022) amounted to 3,166.4 million rubles.Conclusion. Using the example of the Tomsk region, it was noted that when comparing financial resources, the costs of vaccinating girls against HPV are 2.2 times less than the economic damage from cervical cancer mortality. Regional budget funding for girls vaccination in administrative territories is relevant before its integration into the national calendar of preventive vaccinations.

Health impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination using potential next-generation influenza vaccines in Thailand: a modelling study

IntroductionThailand was one of the first low- and middle-income countries to publicly fund seasonal influenza vaccines, but the lack of predictability in the timing of epidemics and difficulty in predicting the dominant influenza subtypes present a challenge for existing vaccines. Next-generation influenza vaccines (NGIVs) are being developed with the dual aims of broadening the strain coverage and conferring longer-lasting immunity. However, there are no economic evaluations of NGIVs in Thailand.MethodsWe estimated the health impact and cost-effectiveness of NGIVs in Thailand between 2005 and 2009 using a combined epidemiological and economic model. We fitted the model to data on laboratory-confirmed influenza cases and then simulated the number of influenza infections, symptomatic cases, hospitalisations and deaths under different vaccination scenarios based on WHO-preferred product characteristics for NGIVs. We used previous estimates of costs and disability adjusted life years (DALYs) for influenza health outcomes to estimate incremental net monetary benefit, vaccine threshold prices and budget impact.ResultsWith the current vaccine programme, there were an estimated 61 million influenza infections. Increasing coverage to 50% using improved vaccines reduced infections to between 23 and 57 million, and with universal vaccines to between 21 and 49 million, depending on the age groups targeted. Depending on the comparator, threshold prices for NGIVs ranged from US$2.80 to US$12.90 per dose for minimally improved vaccines and US$24.60 to US$69.90 for universal vaccines.ConclusionInfluenza immunisation programmes using NGIVs are anticipated to provide considerable health benefits and be cost-effective in Thailand. However, although NGIVs might even be cost-saving in the long run, there could be significant budget implications for the Thai government even if the vaccines can be procured at a substantial discount to the maximum threshold price.

Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Supplemental Guidance on Influenza Vaccination in Adults 65 Years of Age and Older.

Adults 65 years of age and older are at higher risk of influenza complications, such as hospitalization and death. As a result, seasonal influenza immunization is particularly important for this group. This supplemental statement provides an evidence summary on the preferential use of one or more of the age-appropriate influenza vaccines for adults 65 years of age and older, over other age-appropriate influenza vaccines. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI)'s Influenza Working Group undertook an overview of existing systematic reviews on the efficacy, effectiveness, safety and cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination in adults 65 years of age and older. Additionally, NACI's evidence-based process was used to assess the quality of eligible studies, summarize and analyze the findings and apply an ethics, feasibility and acceptability lens to develop recommendations. The evidence suggests that high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV-HD), adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV-Adj) and recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) offer increased benefits for adults 65 years of age and older when compared to standard dose influenza vaccines. The IIV-HD had the most supporting evidence, followed by IIV-Adj and then RIV. Evidence comparing these enhanced vaccines was limited. Following a thorough review of the complete body of evidence, NACI recommends that IIV-HD, IIV-Adj or RIV should be offered over other influenza vaccines for adults 65 years of age and older. NACI also continues to strongly recommend the inclusion of adults 65 years of age and older among those for whom it is particularly important to receive influenza vaccination.

Cost-effectiveness and public health impact of 24-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to recommended pneumococcal vaccines in older adults

IntroductionThe potential impact of an in-development 24-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV24) compared to currently recommended vaccines in older adults is unclear. Similar to most currently available PCVs, PCV24’s formulation is based on childhood pneumococcal disease epidemiology. Decision analysis techniques were used to estimate PCV24 cost-effectiveness and public health effects in US older adults. MethodsA Markov model compared PCV24 to currently recommended US pneumococcal vaccination strategies in older adults (aged ≥65 years) and to no vaccination. Age-, race-, and chronic medical condition-specific pneumococcal illness risks and serotype-specific disease risks were obtained from CDC data. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using Delphi panel and clinical trial data. Vaccination and pneumococcal illness costs were from US databases. Scenario analyses examined indirect effects of childhood pneumococcal vaccination on adult disease. Data were collected and analyses performed in 2024. ResultsPCV24 prevented fewer pneumococcal disease cases and deaths than the recently recommended 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV21), which is formulated based on adult pneumococcal disease serotypes. In cost-effectiveness analyses, PCV21 was economically favorable compared to PCV24 and all other vaccination strategies, both without and with consideration of potential childhood vaccination indirect effects. These findings were robust and consistent in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. ConclusionIn older adults, PCV24 was clinically and economically unfavorable compared to PCV21, which covers more adult disease-causing pneumococcal serotypes and is less susceptible to childhood vaccination indirect effects.

Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Among Older Adults in Greece.

To evaluate the health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of vaccination with bivalent respiratory syncytial virus stabilized prefusion F vaccine (RSVpreF) for the prevention of lower respiratory tract disease caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Greek adults 60 years of age and older. A Markov model was adapted to simulate lifetime risk of health and economic outcomes from the public payer's perspective over a lifetime horizon. Epidemiology, vaccine effectiveness, utilities, and direct medical costs (EUR, 2024) were obtained from published studies, official sources, and local experts. Model outcomes included the number of medically attended RSV cases, stratified by care setting (i.e., hospital, emergency department [ED], outpatient visits [OV]), and attributable RSV-related deaths, costs, life years (LY), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of RSVpreF vaccination compared with no vaccination. The model projected 258,170 hospitalizations, 112,248 ED encounters, 1,201,604 OV, and 25,463 deaths related to RSV in Greek older adults resulting in direct medical costs of EUR 1.6 billion over the lifetime horizon. Assuming RSV vaccination would reach the same coverage rates as pneumococcal and influenza programmes, 18,118 hospitalizations, 7874 ED encounters, 48,079 OV, and 1706 deaths could be prevented over the modelled time horizon. The health benefits associated with RSVpreF contributed to an incremental gain of 10,976 LYs and 7230 QALYs compared with no vaccination. The incremental analysis reported that vaccination with RSVpreF was estimated to be a cost-effective strategy resulting in ICERs of EUR 12,991 per LY gained, EUR 19,723 per QALY gained, and EUR 7870 per hospitalized RSV case avoided compared with no vaccination. Vaccination with RSVpreF was a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of RSV disease in Greek adults over 60 years of age. The introduction of RSV vaccination can improve public health by averting RSV cases and deaths and has the potential to fulfil an unmet medical need.

Cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus adjuvanted vaccine in Portuguese aged ≥ 60 years

Abstract Background Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections are one of the leading causes of lower respiratory tract disease among adults aged ≥60 years in Europe. This study aims to assess the potential public health impact of the RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine, the first approved preventive intervention for the older adult population in Portugal. Methods A monthly-cycle static Markov model was developed to assess RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine impact on adults aged 60 years and older in Portugal. A single dose of RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine was compared to no-vaccination over a three-year time-horizon. The model captures lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) RSV cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare resource utilization. Data inputs were based on local published literature, supplemented by the best available data when local information was lacking. Results Based on preliminary analysis considering 75% vaccine coverage, model outputs estimate that RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine can prevent 71,433 LRTD cases requiring medical attendance, 11,067 hospitalizations, 1,793 intensive care unit admissions and 1,003 deaths. The model estimates that 32 adults need to be vaccinated to avoid one RSV LRTD case, 207 adults need to be vaccinated to avoid one hospitalization and 2,283 adults need to be vaccinated to avoid one death. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at 9,541€, hence the RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine is cost-effective compared to no vaccination. Conclusions The results demonstrate a strong preventive impact of the RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine on health outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in adults ≥60 years, leading to a significant public health benefit. This result emphasizes the importance of preventing RSV to preserve the health and well-being of Portugal’s older adults. In addition, data from ongoing studies may enhance precision and extensive sensitivity analyses validate the robustness of the model’s input assumptions. Key messages • This study shows the robust evidence of RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine to improve public health by preventing thousands of hospitalizations and deaths among ≥60 years, in Portugal. • Vaccinating adults aged ≥ 60 years with RSVPreF3 OA adjuvanted vaccine in Portugal is a cost-effective strategy.

Does the Vaccination against Tick-Borne Encephalitis Offer Good Value for Money for Incidence Rates below the WHO Threshold for Endemicity? A Case Study for Germany.

A closed-cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TBE vaccination. We compared primary vaccination applied to the whole population (aged above 1 year) and to a subpopulation aged between 60 and 85 years to a scenario without vaccination. Since TBE incidence is often underestimated, we included under-ascertained TBE cases and non-CNS TBE infections. Germany was used as a case study due to the availability of detailed incidence data. Our incidence threshold analysis showed that TBE vaccination offers good value for money well below the WHO threshold in most of the analyzed scenarios. Our results support a recommendation for TBE vaccination even in settings with low numbers of reported cases, especially for older patients. Furthermore, this analysis identified major research gaps regarding the costs, utilities, and clinical progression of TBE.

Cost-effectiveness of nonavalent vs bivalent HPV vaccine in Polish setting.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection with significant implications for public health. In Poland, a nationwide vaccination program offers a choice between the 9-valent (9v) and 2-valent (2v) HPV vaccines. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the 9v vs 2v vaccine from the public payer perspective in Poland. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the public health and economic benefits of using 9v vs 2v vaccine in Poland over 100-year horizon using a previously published deterministic dynamic transmission model. A target population of girls and boys aged 12-13 years was considered. The model was populated with local epidemiological inputs, utilities, and costs, including vaccine and administration costs, as well as costs related to medical procedures for HPV-related diseases. The 9v vaccine reduced the prevalence of HPV infections and HPV-related diseases substantially more than 2v vaccine when both are compared to no vaccination strategy. The total discounted cost savings of using the 9v vaccine instead of 2v, excluding the vaccine costs, amounted to EUR 66 million. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio amounted to 8094 EUR per quality-adjusted life year, much below the official cost-effectiveness threshold in Poland set up at the three times the annual gross domestic product per capita. 9v cost-effectiveness ratio remained unchanged when shorter time-horizons of 20, 40, 60, or 80 years were considered. Using 9v HPV vaccine in Poland is highly cost-effective compared to the 2v vaccine.

Cost-Effectiveness of 9-Valent HPV Vaccination for Patients Treated for High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the UK

Patients who have been treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN grade ≥2) are at a high risk for subsequent CIN and other cancers and diseases related to human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV vaccination can reduce the risk of subsequent disease in patients surgically treated for grade 2 or greater CIN; however, there is no formal recommendation for prophylactic HPV vaccination in this high-risk population, and the cost-effectiveness is unknown. To assess the incremental lifetime outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of integrating peritreatment 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccination in combination with posttreatment surveillance for the prevention of cervical cancer and other HPV-attributable diseases in patients surgically treated for grade 2 or greater CIN vs posttreatment surveillance alone from a UK payer perspective. This economic evaluation used 3 independent Markov model structures. Model inputs for vaccine efficacy, utilities, and costs were obtained from published sources, and cervical cancer screening data were obtained from the National Health Service Cervical Screening Program. Costs were adjusted to 2022 to 2023 reference years. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to September 2023. Peritreatment vaccination with 9vHPV in combination with posttreatment surveillance compared with posttreatment surveillance alone. Clinical outcomes included grade 1, 2, or 3 CIN; cervical cancer; vaginal cancer; vulvar cancer; anal cancer; head and neck cancer; genital warts; and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) using a willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of £20 000 (US $26 200) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) were estimated. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. Vaccination with 9vHPV in conjunction with posttreatment surveillance was cost-effective, with a favorable ICER of £13 789.07 (US $18 064.68) per QALY gained (ie, below the WTP of £20 000 per QALY) vs posttreatment surveillance alone. The resulting ICER was £52 358.01 (US $68 588.99) per HPV-related cancer averted and £64 090 (US $83 958.18) per HPV-related cancer death averted. The ICER was most sensitive to discount rate, incidence of HPV infection, vaccine price, and age at initial treatment for grade 2 or greater CIN. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed peritreatment 9vHPV vaccination was cost-effective at the WTP recommended by the UK's Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (90% of iterations <£30 000 [US $39 300] per QALY) in 100% of iterations. These findings suggest that peritreatment prophylactic 9vHPV vaccination is a cost-effective option for preventing subsequent HPV-attributable diseases in patients surgically treated for grade 2 or greater CIN.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pneumococcal Vaccines in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.

Objectives: Pneumococcal disease, caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, is the leading cause of mortality in children worldwide. The tremendous direct cost of hospital admissions and significant indirect costs from productivity loss contribute considerably to its economic burden, with vaccination being the only efficient protection against the illness. Our study aims to summarize the cost-effectiveness of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) implemented in the pediatric population. Methods: Employing the online databases PubMed, Embase, and Medline, we looked for economic evaluations from 2018 until March 2024. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICER) and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) were the primary outcomes for measuring the cost-effectiveness of PCVs. A 28-item CHEERS 2022 checklist was applied to assess the quality of the collected studies. Results: Of the 16 papers found, 9/16 discussed the lower-valent vaccines (PCV13, PCV10) and 7/16 examined the higher-valent vaccines (PCV20, PCV15). PCV13 and PCV10 involved greater costs and generated more QALY compared to no vaccination. Both PCV15 and PCV20 averted substantial healthcare costs and yielded greater quality of life than PCV13. Additionally, PCV20 was a dominant strategy compared to PCV15. Conclusions: Utilizing PCV13 is a very cost-effective option compared to not getting vaccinated. Transitioning from PCV13 to PCV20 would result in higher QALY gain and more cost-saving than switching to PCV15.

Plant-based vaccines against viral hepatitis: A panoptic review.

The traditional vaccines against hepatitis have been instrumental in reducing the incidence of some types of viral hepatitis; however, the need for cost-effective, easily distributable, and needle-free vaccine alternatives has led to the exploration of plant-based vaccines. Plant-based techniques offer a promising avenue for producing viral hepatitis vaccines due to their low-cost cultivation, scalability, and the potential for oral administration. This review highlights the successful expression of hepatitis B surface antigens in plants and the subsequent formation of virus-like particles, which have shown immunogenicity in preclinical and clinical trials. The challenges such as achieving sufficient antigen expression levels, ensuring consistent dosing, and navigating regulatory frameworks, are addressed. The review considers the potential of plant-based vaccines to meet the demands of rapid vaccine deployment in response to outbreaks and their role in global immunization strategies, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review underscores the significant strides made in plant molecular farming and the potential of plant-based vaccines to complement existing immunization methods against viral hepatitis.

Re-evaluating the impact and cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction in 112 low-income and middle-income countries in children younger than 5 years: a modelling study

Streptococcus pneumoniae has been estimated to cause 9·18 million cases of pneumococcal pneumonia, meningitis, and invasive non-pneumonia non-meningitis disease and 318 000 deaths among children younger than 5 years in 2015. We estimated the potential impact and cost-effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) introduction. We updated our existing pseudodynamic model to estimate the impact of 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in 112 low-income and middle-income countries by adapting our previously published pseudodynamic model with new country-specific evidence on vaccine coverage, burden, and post-introduction vaccine impact from WHO-UNICEF estimates of national immunisation coverage and a global burden study. Deaths, disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and cases averted were estimated for children younger than 5 years born between 2000 and 2030. We used specific PCV coverage in each country and a hypothetical scenario in which coverage increased to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) levels. We conducted probabilistic uncertainty analyses. Using specific vaccine coverage in countries, we estimated that PCV13 could prevent 697 000 (95% credibility interval 359 000-1 040 000) deaths, 46·0 (24·0-68·9) million DALYs, and 131 (89·0-172) million cases in 112 countries between 2000 and 2030. PCV was estimated to prevent 5·3% of pneumococcal deaths in children younger than 5 years during 2000-30. The incremental cost of vaccination would be I$851 (510-1530) per DALY averted. If PCV coverage were increased to DTP coverage in 2020, PCV13 could prevent an additional 146 000 (75 500-219 000) deaths. The inclusion of real-world evidence from lower-income settings revealed that delays in PCV roll-out globally and low PCV coverage have cost many lives. Countries with delays in vaccine introduction or low vaccine coverage have experienced many PCV-preventable deaths. These findings underscore the importance of rapidly scaling up PCV to achieve high coverage and maximise vaccine impact. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

Economic Evaluation of Expanding HPV Vaccination Programs for Boys: A Systematic Review

Background: Human papillomavirus is responsible for almost all cases of cervical and non-cervical cancers. Various treatments have been carried out, but they have not been effective enough in reducing the burden. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved three HPV vaccines for use. Since its recommendation in 2006, HPV infections have significantly decreased by 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. Additionally, research has indicated that HPV vaccine is cost-effective in preventing both cervical and non-cervical cancers. The primary target group of HPV vaccination is girls aged 9-14, but some countries are starting to expand their programs according to the WHO recommendation for secondary targets: boys and adult women. This study gave updated information regarding the expansion of HPV vaccination programs for boys. Objective: To systematically review the health economic studies to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of expanding HPV vaccination program for including boys to prevent HPV-related cancer. Method: An electronic literature search was performed on two databases (Pubmed and ScienceDirect) to identify studies published from 2013 to 2023 in English and Indonesian. Three search strategies were used, including the terms «economic evaluation», «HPV», and «boys». The screening and selection of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Results: A total of 306 articles were identified. Only 26 of them were deemed relevant. This research compiled studies from countries with varying economic levels on the expansion of vaccination programs in boys to prevent or reduce cervical, anogenital, and HNC cancers. All the studies used a modeling approach to estimate the number of cases averted and the health care costs. Sixteen studies found that it was cost-effective to expand HPV vaccination programs to include boys. The ICER values were found to be sensitive to the vaccine price, duration of protection, and vaccination coverage. Conclusion: Expanding HPV vaccination to boys is considered a cost-effective solution for preventing HPV-related cancers, based on studies conducted in many countries. It is recommended to conduct an economic evaluation to estimate the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination as a prevention method for HPV-related cancers in low and middle-income countries like Indonesia. To begin the study, it is suggested to expand the HPV vaccination target to boys with a lower-priced vaccine and increased vaccination coverage.

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Subunit Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is garnering increasing attention, with a growing number of subunit RSV vaccines under active clinical investigation. However, comprehensive evidence is limited. We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database inception to 12 January 2024, focusing on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 17 studies were included, encompassing assessments of efficacy (5 studies), safety (17 studies), and immunogenicity (12 studies) of RSV subunit vaccines. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for RSV-associated acute respiratory infection (RSV-ARI) with subunit vaccines was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23-0.43), for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (RSV-LRTI), it was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22-0.44), and for severe RSV-LRTI (RSV-SLRTI), it was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.06-0.29). There was no significant difference in serious adverse events (SAEs) between the vaccine and placebo groups, with a pooled RR of 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98-1.14). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for the geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies was 2.89 (95% CI: 2.43-3.35). Subunit RSV vaccines exhibit strong efficacy, favorable safety profiles, and robust immunogenicity. Future research should focus on the cost-effectiveness of various vaccines to enhance regional and national immunization strategies.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Herpes Zoster Vaccination in a Chinese Population: Recombinant Subunit Vaccine versus Live Attenuated Vaccine.

Currently, the recombinant subunit vaccine and live attenuated vaccine in the prevention of herpes zoster are approved for marketing in China. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the recombinant subunit vaccine and the live attenuated vaccine in the Chinese population. A decision tree-Markov analysis model was utilized to estimate expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), comparing the lifetime cost-effectiveness of vaccination with the recombinant subunit vaccine (London, United Kingdom, Shingrix, GSK) to that of the live attenuated vaccine (Changchun, China, Ganwei, Changchun Bcht) in the Chinese population, with the primary outcome measure being the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In the base-case analysis, the ICERs for the recombinant subunit vaccine ranged by age from USD 3428 to USD 5743 per QALY, while the ICERs for the live attenuated vaccine ranged from USD 4017 to USD 18,254 per QALY, compared with no vaccination. Among all age groups, the category of 60 to 69 years was the optimal age for vaccination. The results were most sensitive to changes in herpes zoster incidence, vaccine efficacy, and discount rate. Even with a two-dose compliance rate of 20% for the recombinant subunit vaccine, vaccination remained cost-effective. ZVL would need to reduce costs by at least 12.2% compared to RZV to have a cost-effectiveness advantage. The recombinant subunit vaccine and the live attenuated vaccine were both cost-effective in the Chinese population, but, relatively, the recombinant subunit vaccine had a greater advantage in disease prevention and cost-effectiveness in all age groups above 50 years.

Cost-Effectiveness of Varicella Vaccination for 1–4-Year-Olds in Shanghai, China

IntroductionVaricella has not yet been included in the National Immunization Program (NIP) in China, and varicella vaccination strategies vary by region. To determine the optimal varicella vaccination strategy in Shanghai, China, the cost-effectiveness and five-year costs of five immunization scenarios were analyzed. MethodsA static decision tree-Markov model was developed in 2022 to assess the cost-effectiveness and five-year costs of voluntary and routine varicella vaccination programs in the 2019 birth cohort in Shanghai from a societal perspective. Parameters were collected in 2022 from the varicella surveillance system, a questionnaire survey of 414 guardians of patients with childhood varicella, and semi-structured interviews with 20 experts on varicella outbreaks from different institutions in Shanghai. The outcomes included varicella cases avoided, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss, and incremental costs per QALY (ICER). The five-year costs were compared with local medical expenditures. ResultsAmong the five scenarios, one dose of routine varicella vaccination was the most cost-saving (USD 70.2) and cost-effective (Dominant) with a five-year immunization expenditure of USD 9.9 million. Two doses of routine varicella vaccination had the highest QALY (29.9), and its ICER (USD 791.9/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay threshold (USD 5,203-23,767/QALY). The five-year immunization expenditure was USD 19.8 million. The effectiveness and price of vaccines, vaccination coverage, and per capita income are the four main factors that affect ICERs. ConclusionsIn Shanghai, the two doses of routine varicella vaccination strategy for 1- and 4-year-olds with a 95% coverage rate was found to be the optimal varicella immunization strategy.

Assessment Of Knowledge And Practices Of Influenza And Pneumococcal Vaccination Among Type 1 And Type 2 Diabetes Patients In Bewal International Hospital

Patients with diabetes have high risk of developing pneumococcal and influenza infections and are advised to take immunization for prevention against the disease. Objective: To determine the level of awareness and immunization behaviors for influenza and pneumonia among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes received treatment at Bewal International Hospital, Gujar Khan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed at the diabetic clinic of Bewal International Hospital, Gujar Khan, from June 2023 to August 2023. A total of 200 patients with diabetes were included in the study. Socio-demographic details were noted on a pre-structured questionnaire. Questions about knowledge and practices of vaccination particularly influenza and pneumococcal were asked and responses were noted. Results: The mean age of the patients was 47.0 ± 1.18 years. 193 (96.5%) had poor knowledge regarding influenza and pneumococcal infections and their vaccines. An alarming 99% of the people did not have any clue about any vaccination against pneumococcal and influenza infection in patients with diabetes. Similarly, only 1.0% of patients had good practices regarding these vaccinations. Conclusions: The knowledge and practice of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in patients with diabetes is drastically low in the study population. The health care providers should educate the patients and the government should take concrete steps towards education and improvement of the socioeconomic condition of people along with cost-effectiveness and availability of vaccines for every individual