Use Of Cancer Screening Research Articles

Age at first menstruation and clinical breast cancer screening utilization: insights from the 2021 Côte d'Ivoire demographic and health survey

BackgroundThere is a strong evidence showing that women who start menstruation early are at a greater risk of developing breast cancer. Recognizing that women will seek breast cancer screening when they have a high perceived risk, we hypothesized that women who experienced early menarche will be more likely to utilize clinical breast examination (CBE). Hence, we aimed to investigate the association between age at first menstruation and women’s utilization of CBE in Côte d'Ivoire.MethodsWe used data from the 2021 Côte d'Ivoire demographic and health survey. A sample of 14,685 women was used for the analysis. A descriptive analysis, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were computed in STATA version 18. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and a 95% confidence interval was used to present the result.ResultsCBE utilization was 17.4%. Women who had their first menstruation before attaining 15 years were significantly less likely to utilize CBE services [AOR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.81–0.99]. A significantly higher utilization of CBE was found among those with primary [AOR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.29–1.70], secondary [AOR = 2.96, 95% CI 2.59–3.38], and higher education [AOR = 4.35, 95% CI 3.50–5.40] compared to those with no formal education. Increasing likelihood of CBE utilization was observed as age increased. Rural residence was associated with lower odds of CBE utilization (AOR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.74–0.95]. Increasing wealth status was associated with higher odds of CBE utilization with those in the richest households having the highest odds compared to women in the poorest household [AOR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.69–2.64].ConclusionUtilization of CBE is low among women of reproductive age in Côte d'Ivoire. We conclude that even though existing literature has established early age at first menstruation as a strong risk factor for breast cancer, CBE utilization is significantly low among those who had early menarche. Going forward, it is necessary for Côte d'Ivoire’s health Ministry to intensify breast cancer awareness in the country. Such awareness campaigns must emphasize age at menarche as a risk factor so as to motivate women with a history of early menstruation to utilize CBE.

Utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women aged 18 to 59 years in Laikipia East Sub-County, Kenya

INTRODUCTION Cervical cancer, a preventable disease, continues to be the leading cause of death resulting from cancers in Kenya. Despite free cervical cancer screening services in all government hospitals in Laikipia County, the screening uptake remains low at 19% compared to the WHO target of 70%. Hence, understanding the barriers and facilitators is important in informing targeted interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A mixed-method cross-sectional study was done in Laikipia East Sub-County, Kenya, between July and August 2022. The participants were women aged between 18 to 59 years. Data was collected on demographic factors and cervical cancer screening utilization. Also, qualitative data was collected using 5 FGDs and 6 KIIs to get more insights. Chi-square tests and odds ratios were calculated using STATA version 15 to assess associations and determine the level of significance. RESULTS Out of the 272 participants, 32.4% (n=88) had ever screened for cervical cancer. The logistic regression analysis indicates that as women age, their likelihood of undergoing screening increases, particularly for those aged 50-59, who show a tenfold higher likelihood of screening [ OR 10.40 (3.20-33.82), p-value <0.001]. Conversely, unemployment is associated with a reduced likelihood of screening [OR 0.42 (0.18-0.99), p-value 0.047] while individuals earning 50-200 USD per month exhibit an increased likelihood [OR 2.25 (1.30-3.87) p-value 0.004]. However, religion, marital status, and education level factors do not show a significant association with the utilization of cervical cancer screening as indicated by p-values of 0.735, 0.069, and 0.765, respectively. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Laikipia county government offers free cervical cancer screening in all government-run facilities but many, especially those aged 25-49, lack awareness. It is vital to boost awareness through community education on cervical cancer causes and prevention, emphasizing screening as preventive. Affordable treatment is also crucial for community reassurance post-diagnosis.

P2.17B.03 Improving Lung Cancer Screening Utilization and Efficiency Through a Patient-Centered Pathway with Virtual Visits

P2.17B.03 Improving Lung Cancer Screening Utilization and Efficiency Through a Patient-Centered Pathway with Virtual Visits

Voluntary private health insurance and cancer screening utilisation in Europe.

Cancer is a leading cause of death in Europe and prevention measures, like screening, are therefore becoming increasingly important. Although European countries provide universal health coverage, including cancer screenings, many people also have private health insurance. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between Voluntary private health insurance (VPHI) and cancer screening, specifically breast and colorectal cancer screening. Using data from SHARE, the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe, different logistic and multilevel regressions were estimated. The major finding shows a positive correlation between people being screened for cancer and having VPHI. Three conclusions can be drawn: advantageous selection may exist in private health insurance; spillover effects may exist from the public sector into the private sector, which in turn may result in a lower insurance premium; and there may be a perpetuation of inequalities in health service utilisation. Several policy implications can be drawn from this result, but the most relevant concerns narrowing the inequities that could potentially arise between those who have private health insurance and those who do not.

The National Cancer Aid monitoring (NCAM-online) of ultraviolet radiation risk and protection behavior: a population-based observational trend study with four annual online survey waves

BackgroundUltraviolet (UV) radiation is the most important risk factor for skin cancer development. Sunlight is the main source of UV radiation in the general population. In addition, tanning beds are a source of artificial UV radiation. Since the incidence of skin cancer is increasing worldwide, it is necessary to monitor UV-related risk behaviors such as intentional indoor and outdoor tanning, as well as sun protection behavior in the general population and specific subgroups and settings. This is the aim of the National Cancer Aid Monitoring online (NCAM-online), a continuation and further development of the NCAM.MethodsThe NCAM-online is a longitudinal trend study consisting of four annual survey waves. Each year, 4,000 individuals aged 16–65 years living in Germany will be surveyed using online questionnaires. Each year, intentional indoor and outdoor tanning will be assessed. In addition, varying specific topics regarding skin cancer prevention, such as the utilization of skin cancer screening, will be addressed in the questionnaires.DiscussionThe findings of the NCAM-online will provide an important basis for the German Cancer Aid and Working Group on Dermatologic Prevention (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Prävention, ADP) to develop targeted prevention campaigns and projects aimed at preventing skin cancer. The explorative nature of the NCAM-online allows for the identification of new potential starting points for prevention and education. In addition, the longitudinal design allows for a description of the trend in the prevalence of intentional tanning. For tanning bed use, representative trend data from 2012 are available for Germany, to which NCAM-online will add annual data until 2027.

Effectiveness of communication in promoting utilisation of breast cancer screening services among women working in Anganwadi centres.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females, worldwide. Cancer screening in developing countries is mainly opportunistic type, characterized by low coverage and over-screening of women with increased access to health care services. This study was thus designed to understand the various factors preventing the participation and utilization of breast cancer screening, thereby study the different approaches for encouraging their participation and also the effectiveness of different ways of communication to Anganwadi Workers (AWW) and Anganwadi Helpers (AWH) in increasing breast cancer screening uptake at cancer screening camps. It was a mixed-method study design among Anganwadi workers and helpers. The study included 376 Anganwadi workers working in Kolar and Bangarpete Talukas. The trained Anganwadi supervisor followed by the respective PHC medical officer (in the intervention group) invited the AWW and AWH for breast cancer screening and only through Anganwadi supervisor (in control group). Those women (AWW and AWH) who did not attend the breast cancer screening camp were listed and contacted through mobile phone to find out the reasons for the same. The data were analysed using SPSS statistics version 22; Chi-square and logistic regression were used to test significance. There were 186 subjects in the intervention and 190 subjects in the control group. The mean (SD) age in intervention and control groups was 43.7 (8.5) and 44.2 (8.7) years, respectively. Amongst the 376 women (AWW and AWH) invited for the breast cancer screening service from both the groups, a total of 238 (63.2%) of them attended screening camp. The screening uptake was more in the intervention group (73.4%) compared with the control group (53.6%). This difference across the two groups (20%) was found to be statistically significant. The sub-category 'anxiety' (31.9%) was reported to be the highest barrier and least was in the sub-category 'no replacement' (4.3%). The sub-categories are also supported by verbatim quotes. The uptake of screening was more in the intervention group (73.4%) compared with the control group (53.6%). This difference of 20% was found to be statistically significant on univariate analysis (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, it was found that both the approaches were equally effective.

From Insights to Impact: Understanding Cancer Screening Choices through Mixed-Methods.

The main objective of this comprehensive mixed-methods investigation conducted in Jordan were to explore and understand men's engagement in cancer screening. The research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a survey with 209 participants and focus group interviews with 30 individuals. The survey involved quantitative data collection methods to gather information on cancer screening participation rates among men in Amman. Focus group interviews were conducted to collect qualitative data on the factors influencing cancer screening utilization among men in Amman. The study revealed a notably low participation rate, with less than 37% of men engaging in cancer screening. The diminished involvement was attributed to several factors, including health illiteracy, language barriers, restricted access to health-related information and screening services, and cultural considerations. Based on the findings, the research strongly advocates for tailored interventions that are culturally specific. The emphasis is on the importance of training community health workers to address the identified challenges and enhance both cancer prevention awareness and screening accessibility in Jordan.

Cancer History and Social Support Impact Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization by Race/Ethnicity.

This study examined the association among cancer history, social support, and up-to-date colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among four racial/ethnic groups. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data on respondents aged 45 to 75 years from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Our outcome of interest was CRC screening and exposures of interest were race/ethnicity, cancer history, and social support. Weighted multivariable logistic regression was performed. Among 73,869 adults, the CRC screening rate was 66.8% with the highest rate in non-Hispanic (NH), Whites (72.2%), and the lowest in Hispanics (52.6%). Screening rates were higher in adults with a cancer history (81.9%) and those having social support (69%). Hispanic adults with a cancer history had lower screening use (50.9% vs. 77.4% in the no cancer history group; P value < 0.001). Regardless of race/ethnicity, adults without social support had lower screening utilization (P value < 0.05). In effect modification, NH White adults who reported no cancer history and lack of social support were 12% less likely to have CRC screening than those with social support but without cancer history (OR, 0.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.79-0.98). Similar results were observed among Hispanic adults without a cancer history and social support, with 37% less likely to have CRC screening than those with social support but no cancer history (OR, 0.63; 95% confidence intervals, 0.42-0.93). NH White and Hispanic adults without a cancer history and limited social support were less likely to have CRC screening uptake. By implementing culturally tailored interventions that address social support needs, greater CRC screening compliance may be increased among these populations. Prevention Relevance: Adherence to CRC screening recommendations reduces cancer incidence and mortality. Effective implementation of culturally tailored interventions that address social support needs and consider cancer history have the potential for improving CRC screening compliance among NH White and Hispanic adults without a cancer history.

Community Collaboration to Advance Racial/Ethnic Equity in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Multilevel Intervention to Improve Screening and Follow-up in Community Health Centers

IntroductionColorectal cancer (CRC) screening utilization is low among low-income, uninsured, and minority populations that receive care in community health centers (CHCs). There is a need for evidence-based interventions to increase screening and follow-up care in these settings. MethodsA multilevel, multi-component pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial is being conducted at 8 CHCs in two metropolitan areas (Boston and Los Angeles), with two arms: (1) Mailed FIT outreach with text reminders, and (2) Mailed FIT-DNA with patient support. We also include an additional CHC in Rapid City (South Dakota) that follows a parallel protocol for FIT-DNA but is not randomized due to lack of a comparison group. Eligible individuals in participating clinics are primary care patients ages 45–75, at average-risk for CRC, and overdue for CRC screening. Participants with abnormal screening results are offered navigation for follow-up colonoscopy and CRC risk assessment. ResultsThe primary outcome is the completion rate of CRC screening at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include the screening completion rate at 180 days and the rate of colonoscopy completion within 6 months among participants with an abnormal result. Additional goals are to enhance our understanding of facilitators and barriers to CRC risk assessment in CHC settings. ConclusionsThis study assesses the effectiveness of two multilevel interventions to increase screening participation and follow-up after abnormal screening in under-resourced clinical settings, informing future efforts to address CRC disparities. Trial RegistrationNCT05714644

Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization among Kidney Transplant Recipients, 2001 to 2018.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) have elevated risks of cervical precancers and cancers and guidelines recommend more frequent cervical cancer screening exams. However, little is known about current trends in cervical cancer screening in this unique population. We described patterns in the uptake of cervical cancer screening exams among female KTRs and identified factors associated with screening utilization. This retrospective cohort study included female KTRs between 20 and 65 years old, with Texas Medicare fee-for-service coverage, who received a transplant between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2017. We determined the cumulative incidence of receiving cervical cancer screening post-transplant using ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes and assessed factors associated with screening utilization, using the Fine and Gray model to account for competing events. Subdistribution hazard models were used to assess factors associated with screening uptake. Among 2,653 KTRs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative incidences of initiating a cervical cancer screening exam post-transplant were 31.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 30.0%-33.6%], 48.0% (95% CI, 46.2%-49.9%), and 58.5% (95% CI, 56.7%-60.3%), respectively. KTRs who were 55 to 64 years old (vs. <45 years old) and those with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score post-transplant were less likely to receive cervical cancer screening post-transplant. Cervical cancer screening uptake is low in the years immediately following a kidney transplant. Our findings highlight a need for interventions to improve cervical cancer screening utilization among kidney transplant recipients. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1554.

A Brief Report of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Before, During, and in the Later Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States

IntroductionAlthough COVID-19 has affected health care and screening utilization, its impact on lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake remains unclear. Our study investigated LCS utilization and associated predictors among adults eligible for LCS before (2019), during (2020–2021), and at a later stage (2022) of COVID-19. MethodsWe used cross-sectional, nationally representative, population-based data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System over 4 consecutive years: 2019 (n = 4484; weighted n = 1,559,37), 2020 (n = 1239; weighted n = 200,301), 2021 (n = 1673; weighted n = 668,359), and 2022 (n = 20,804; weighted n = 9,458,907). The outcome was self-reported LCS uptake (0 = did not have LCS in the past 12 mo and 1 = underwent LCS in the past 12 mo). We conducted weighted statistics and multivariable logistic regression. ResultsOverall, of 11,886,704 million individuals eligible for LCS, 2,129,900 received LCS in 4 years (2019–2022). National rates of LCS among individuals eligible for screening were 16.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]:14.4–18.5), 19.4% (95% CI:15.3–24.3), 18.3% (95% CI:15.6–21.3), and 18.1% (95% CI:17.1–19.2) in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. Respondents reporting lung disease and cancer (other than lung cancer) history were more likely to receive LCS across all 4 years. During the pandemic (2020), Hispanic (versus White), and rural (versus urban) residents had lower odds of LCS utilization. In 2022, men had increased odds of reporting LCS use relative to women. No sex differences in LCS use were observed in previous years. ConclusionsOur findings indicate consistently low LCS utilization (<20%) over 4 years. Nationwide efforts to boost LCS awareness and utilization are essential for mitigating the lung cancer burden in the United States.

Knowledge, Practice and Factors associated with Utilization of Cervical Cancer Screening Services.

Cervical cancer is treatable with regular screening and follow-up practices. The utilization of cervical cancer utilization services is found to be unsatisfactory in the context of Nepal. The objective of this study was to assess the factors that influence knowledge, practice, and utilization of cervical cancer screening among women in the Dhulikhel Municipality, Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 156 married women residing in Dhulikhel Municipality. The study participants were selected using the convenience sampling method. A standard questionnaire was used to collect the information. This study examined socio-demograhic data, knowledge, practice, and factors associated with cervical cancer screening. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Only one-fifth (17.9%) of the participants had received a cervical cancer screening. Most participants possessed a sufficient level, 134 out of 85.9%, of information about cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening. Annual healthcare visits (p=0.00), participant knowledge (p=0.014), and perceived barriers (p=0.001) were statistically significant factors in the uptake of cervical cancer screening. Out of those who felt they were highly susceptible, just one-fourth, or 25%, had undergone cervical cancer screening services. The number of medical visits, participants' knowledge, and perceived barriers had a significant impact on the uptake of cervical cancer screening. However, there was not found any relationship between the use of cervical cancer screening and perceived susceptibility and other socio-demographic factors.

Implementing fragmentomics into real world screening interventions to evaluate clinical utility among individuals with elevated risk for lung cancer (FIRSTLUNG) L301.

TPS11189 Background: To optimize the impact of lung cancer screening at the healthcare system level, additional tools are needed to increase the benefits of screening. While low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been shown to improve lung cancer detection and reduce mortality, it is not without its risks, such as radiation exposure, false-positive results, and unnecessary interventions often leading to complications. The additional complexity of lung cancer screening is the subpar adherence to LDCT for eligible individuals, which undermines the benefits of screening. Therefore, there is a need for alternative non-invasive methodologies that exploit our understanding of the biology of cancer pathogenesis. This clinical utility study aims to observe how a non–invasive blood-based test impacts physician behavior and LDCT utilization. Methods: FIRSTLUNG 301 (NCT06145750) is a prospective, cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) to observe the impact of the DELFI Lung cancer screening test on lung cancer screening utilization in primary care practices. Enrolled practices must meet the eligibility criteria of having a minimum of 50 actively engaged individuals in the practice eligible for lung cancer screening per the 2021 USPSTF criteria. These practices will be randomized 1:1:2 to Arm A1 (control), Arm A2 (control), or Arm B (intervention). Arm A practices will be randomized 1:1 into two groups (A1:A2) to observe the standard of care for lung cancer screening. Practices in A1 will be observed; practices in A2 will receive standard education on lung cancer screening for CME credit. Randomizing within Arms A1 and A2 aims to delineate the impact standard lung cancer screening education may have on utilization. Arm B (intervention) practices will receive education and have access to order the blood-based test for screen-eligible individuals that remained unscreened. The primary study endpoint is the proportion of practice-identified lung cancer screen-eligible individuals receiving a screening CT order and scan during the study period in the entirety of Arm A (control) versus Arm B (intervention). This RCT aims to understand the utilization and impact on lung cancer screening uptake after the DELFI blood-based test intended to inform clinical guidelines and policies focused on improving patient care and health outcomes. Progress: The study was initiated on October 31, 2023, with practice randomization. As of February 2024, the study is open for enrollment with an estimated primary study completion date of December 2025. Clinical trial information: NCT06145750 .

Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe intricate balance between the advantages and risks of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) impedes the utilization of lung cancer screening (LCS). Guiding shared decision-making (SDM) for well-informed choices regarding LCS is pivotal. There has been a notable increase in research related to SDM. However, these studies possess limitations. For example, they may ignore the identification of decision support and needs from the perspective of health care providers and high-risk groups. Additionally, these studies have not adequately addressed the complete SDM process, including pre-decisional needs, the decision-making process, and post-decision experiences. Furthermore, the East-West divide of SDM has been largely ignored. This study aimed to explore the decisional needs and support for shared decision-making for LCS among health care providers and high-risk groups in China.MethodsInformed by the Ottawa Decision-Support Framework, we conducted qualitative, face-to-face in-depth interviews to explore shared decision-making among 30 lung cancer high-risk individuals and 9 health care providers. Content analysis was used for data analysis.ResultsWe identified 4 decisional needs that impair shared decision-making: (1) LCS knowledge deficit; (2) inadequate supportive resources; (3) shared decision-making conceptual bias; and (4) delicate doctor-patient bonds. We identified 3 decision supports: (1) providing information throughout the LCS process; (2) providing shared decision-making decision coaching; and (3) providing decision tools.ConclusionsThis study offers valuable insights into the decisional needs and support required to undergo LCS among high-risk individuals and perspectives from health care providers. Future studies should aim to design interventions that enhance the quality of shared decision-making by offering LCS information, decision tools for LCS, and decision coaching for shared decision-making (e.g., through community nurses). Simultaneously, it is crucial to assess individuals’ needs for effective deliberation to prevent conflicts and regrets after arriving at a decision.

Abstract PO5-09-09: Incidence of Breast Cancer in Hispanic Women Across the US: A Focus on Texas

Abstract Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers affecting the female population in the United States, particularly among the Hispanic community. According to the CDC, the incidence rate of new breast cancer cases in Hispanic women is 95.6 per 100,000 annually, and the mortality rate is 13.7 per 100,000 women annually. Texas is home to one of the largest Hispanic communities in the US. By analyzing the prevalence, mortality, and access to healthcare services in Texas, we can shed light on the unique aspects of breast cancer within the Hispanic population. Overall, this study will provide valuable insights and identify potential avenues for reducing disparities and improving healthcare outcomes for Hispanic women affected by breast cancer. Materials and methods This study used comparative data from State Cancer Profiles on the CDC and NIH databases. The database was used to generate an overall comparison of breast cancer in Hispanic women across different US states. Comparison factors analyzed include incidence, mortality, insurance, and screening efforts. Significant differences were noted especially in Texas. Graphs and quantitative data for comparison factors were generated. This data is from 2015-2019 unless noted. Results The incidence of breast cancer in Hispanic women in Texas (TX) is 93.5 (Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate-cases per 100,000) with a CI of (92.2-94.8). The incidence of BC in Hispanic women in the US averages 99.0 with a CI of 98.7-99.9. From the incidence data, Hispanic women in Texas have a lower overall incidence of BC compared to the rest of the Hispanic females in the US. When analyzing the mortality rate, Hispanic women in TX have an Age-Adjusted Death Rate (deaths per 100,000) of 15.2 (CI of 14.7-15.8). In the US, Hispanic women have an Age-Adjusted Death Rate (deaths per 100,000) of 13.0 (CI of 13.4-13.9). To analyze preventative measures, a graph reporting mammogram use in 2020 by state was gathered. In TX 2020, the estimated age-adjusted prevalence of mammograms among Hispanic females from 50-74 years old was 75.0% (CI of 67.0%-81.7%). Nationally, the age-adjusted prevalence among Hispanic females 50-74 years who reported mammogram screening in 2 years was 79.7% (CI of 76.6 – 82.4). As for Texas insurance rates in 2020, Hispanic women under 65 years old, 27.4 % reported being uninsured. In comparison, other ethnicities such as African American (non-Hispanic) women, 16.5% reported to be uninsured, and white (non-Hispanic) women in Texas 11.8 % reported to be uninsured. Additionally, to further analyze if the lack of preventative measures was causing women to have a higher mortality rate, the instance of late-stage diagnosis of BC in Texan Hispanic women was analyzed. The age-adjusted incidence rate of late-stage breast cancer in Hispanic women was reported to be 33.4 (CI of 32.6-34.2) and the national incidence of late-stage BC in Hispanic women is 35.0 (CI of 35.1-35.8). Conclusion Even with Texas having one of the largest Hispanic communities, Hispanic women with breast cancer in Texas are faced with obstacles that lead to an increase in their mortality rate. As seen in the results, Hispanic women have less incidence of BC (including late stage) than their equivalent across the US but Hispanic women in TX have higher mortality rates in comparison. This is additionally accompanied by a decrease in insured women and a decrease in the utilization of cancer screenings. Lack of access to affordable healthcare and lack of regulatory cancer screenings cause Hispanic women to meet their premature death. Further analysis of the effects of affordable health care or further molecular investigation of this population is encouraged to research to fully conclude the reason behind this population's disparities. Citation Format: Catalina Esguerra, Kemely Santos Barbosa, Roy Khalife, Anthony Magliocco. Incidence of Breast Cancer in Hispanic Women Across the US: A Focus on Texas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-09-09.

Factors affecting the participation and utilization of breast cancer screening services among health care workers Kolar: a qualitative study

Factors affecting the participation and utilization of breast cancer screening services among health care workers Kolar: a qualitative study

Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Transgender Men and Nonbinary People: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Boston Community Health Center.

Purpose: Clinical monitoring for patients receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) has the potential to facilitate their receipt of preventive health services. We aimed to determine whether GAHT is associated with increased utilization of cervical cancer screening among transgender men (TM) and nonbinary persons assigned female at birth (NB-AFAB). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of a single community health center in Boston. Persons of all gender identities eligible for cervical cancer screening during 2008-2019 were assessed. The outcome of interest was receipt of cervical cancer screening based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. We compared the proportion of persons who received cervical cancer screening by prescription of GAHT. Results: We identified 13,267 eligible persons. This cohort included 10,547 (79.5%) cisgender women, 1547 (11.7%) TM, and 1173 (8.8%) NB-AFAB persons. Among all persons eligible for cervical cancer screening, TM and NB-AFAB persons were less likely to receive screening than cisgender women (56.2% and 56.1% vs. 60.5% respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75-0.93; OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.74-0.94, respectively). Among TM, those prescribed testosterone were more likely to receive cervical cancer screening than those not prescribed testosterone (57.9% vs. 48.2%, OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.14-1.92). Among NB-AFAB adults, those prescribed testosterone were more likely to receive cervical cancer screening than those not prescribed testosterone (61.9% vs. 51.5%, OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.21-1.93). Conclusions: The benefits of engagement in care to access GAHT may extend beyond the hormonal intervention to preventive health services.

Circulating microRNAs in association with pancreatic cancer risk within 5 years.

Early detection is critical for improving pancreatic cancer prognosis. Our study aims to identify circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with pancreatic cancer risk. The two-stage study used plasma samples collected ≤5 years prior to cancer diagnosis, from case-control studies nested in five prospective cohort studies. The discovery stage included 185 case-control pairs from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Replication stage samples comprised 277 pairs from Shanghai Women's Health Study/Shanghai Men's Health Study, Southern Community Cohort Study, and Multiethnic Cohort Study. Seven hundred and ninety-eight miRNAs were measured using the NanoString nCounter Analysis System. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for per 10% change in miRNAs in association with pancreatic cancer risk were derived from conditional logistic regression analysis in discovery and replication studies, separately, and then meta-analyzed. Stratified analysis was conducted by age at diagnosis (<65/≥65 years) and time interval between sample collection and diagnosis (≤2/>2 years). In the discovery stage, 120 risk associated miRNAs were identified at p < .05. Three were validated in the replication stage: hsa-miR-199a-3p/hsa-miR-199b-3p, hsa-miR-767-5p, and hsa-miR-191-5p, with respective ORs (95% CI) being 0.89 (0.84-0.95), 1.08 (1.02-1.13), and 0.90 (0.85-0.95). Five additional miRNAs, hsa-miR-640, hsa-miR-874-5p, hsa-miR-1299, hsa-miR-22-3p, and hsa-miR-449b-5p, were validated among patients diagnosed at ≥65 years, with OR (95% CI) of 1.23 (1.09-1.39), 1.33 (1.16-1.52), 1.25 (1.09-1.43), 1.28 (1.12-1.46), 0.76 (0.65-0.89), and 1.22 (1.07-1.39), respectively. The miRNA targets were enriched in pancreatic carcinogenesis/progression-related pathways. Our study suggests that circulating miRNAs may identify individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer ≤5 years prior to diagnosis, indicating its potential utility in cancer screening and surveillance.

Association between Socioecological Status, Nutrient Intake, and Cancer Screening Behaviors in Adults Aged 40 and Over: Insights from the Eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2019).

Cancer screening is pivotal for early detection and improved survival rates. While socio-ecological factors are known to influence screening uptake, the role of lifestyle, dietary habits, and general health in shaping these decisions remains underexplored. Utilizing the 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), this study examined the myriad of factors impacting cancer screening utilization. Data from 274,872 adults aged 40 years or older were scrutinized, highlighting demographics, income, lifestyle behaviors, health-related variables, nutrient intake, and dietary quality. A combination of descriptive statistics and logistic regression helped us ascertain influential determinants. Higher educational attainment and income quartiles were positively correlated with cancer screening rates. Regular walkers, those engaged in moderate physical activity, and individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis were more likely to get screened. High-risk drinkers and smokers were less inclined towards screening. Dietary habits also influenced screening decisions. Notably, participants with healthier eating behaviors, indicated by factors such as regular breakfasts and fewer meals out, were more likely to undergo screening. Additionally, nutrient intake analysis revealed that those who had undergone screening consumed greater quantities of most nutrients, bar a few exceptions. For individuals aged 50-64, nutritional assessment indicators highlighted a higher mean adequacy ratio (MAR) and index of nutritional quality (INQ) value among those who participated in screening, suggesting better nutritional quality. This study elucidates the complex socio-ecological and nutritional landscape influencing cancer screening decisions. The results underscore the importance of a holistic approach, emphasizing lifestyle, dietary habits, and socio-economic considerations. It provides a roadmap for policymakers to craft more inclusive screening programs, ensuring equal access and promoting early detection.

Cervical cancer screening utilization among HIV-positive women in Edo State, Nigeria

Abstract Background: The enhanced risk of cervical cancer among women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) stems from the close association between HIV and increased rates of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Detecting pre-malignant lesions early through screening is crucial, as cervical cancer is preventable. Identifying these lesions promptly could potentially save many women’s lives. Objective: This study aimed to assess the utilization of cervical screening services among women attending an HIV clinic in Edo State, Nigeria. Specific objectives included examining awareness levels, utilization rates, and potential barriers to access. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at an institution and involved HIV-positive women attending an HIV clinic from August 2022 to July 2023. The study utilized a convenience sampling method with a sample size of 370 participants. Data reliability, deemed adequate at 0.781, was data reliability of 0.781 obtained was adequate for the study utilized. Analysis was performed, and findings were presented using frequency tables. Hypotheses were tested using χ2 at a significance level of 0.05. Results: The participants’ mean age was 38.25 ± 4.51 years, with an average age at menarche of 15.12 ± 3.56 years, age at first intercourse at 18.21 ± 3.41 years, and years of HIV status at 7.11 ± 2.12 years. The mean duration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) was 6.72 ± 5.21 years. One hundred ninety-one individuals (51.6%) reported awareness of screening, while 65 (17.6%) had undergone screening. There was a significant association between awareness of screening and its utilization. (P &lt; 0.001 removed). Among the 305 participants who had not undergone screening, 261 (85.6%) expressed willingness to do so. Barriers to cervical cancer screening included fear of the results (257 participants, 84.3%), financial constraints (200 participants, 65.6%), absence of symptoms (240 participants, 78.3%), and lack of motivation (289 participants, 94.8%). Conclusion: The study findings indicated insufficient awareness among participants and low utilization of screening services. As a result, it is recommended that enhancing healthcare workers’ abilities to promote cervical cancer awareness and encourage adherence to screening within this population is crucial to boost uptake.