SESSION TITLE: Interventional Pulmonary Procedures SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Slide PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 at 02:45 PM - 04:15 PM PURPOSE: To evaluate if flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the very elderly provides clinically useful information that affects treatment decisions with an acceptable risk profile. There are several studies evaluating the safety and utility of bronchoscopy in the elderly, but this study describes the oldest population studied to date. METHODS: All bronchoscopies performed in the San Antonio Military Health System over a five year period were reviewed and all patients aged over 85 years old with bronchoscopies performed outside of the ICU were included. A control group of patients aged 65-79 with bronchoscopies performed during the same time period was collected. Procedural data was collected from the electronic medical record including, age at time of procedure, type of bronchoscopy, sampling techniques, medication doses, complications, diagnostic yield, and subsequent treatment. Variables were analyzed with a student’s t-test or a fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 73 bronchoscopies were performed in the study group, with a mean age of 87.1 (85-96 y). The patient complication rate in the study group was similar to the control group, 9.6% vs 8.2%, p > 0.99. Hypoxia occurred in 5 patients, 3 post procedure ICU transfers, 2 deaths within 30 days, and 1 each of pneumothorax, intubation, bipap use. There were no instances of oversedation requiring reversal agents and no deaths within 72 hours of procedure. Evaluation for malignancy was the most common indication for bronchoscopy(68% vs 59%, p = 0.3) and the most common finding (48% vs 38%, p = 0.24). The study group had statistically significant differences from the control group in the following categories: higher mean age(p < 0.001), higher ASA class(p = 0.03), lower mean midazolam dose (2mg vs 2.6 mg, p = 0.004), and fewer cancer patients who underwent lobectomy (0% vs 5%, p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in the indications for bronchoscopy (p = 0.15), patients undergoing transbronchial biopsy (29% vs 25%, p = 0.7), the diagnostic yield (44% vs 33%, p = 0.17), or the number of patients diagnosed with cancer who received any form of cancer therapy (66% vs 70%, p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: This is the oldest cohort of patients undergoing FB studied for procedural complications and diagnostic yield. Despite the fact that the study group was older with a higher average ASA class, the results suggest that bronchoscopy is has essentially the same safety profile for the very elderly. Additionally, it suggests the information obtained from bronchoscopy is utilized in guiding therapy and age does not prevent patients from receiving therapy for malignancy. The lower rate of lobectomies in the study group may reflect poorer functional status and inability to tolerate surgical intervention, or it may be a result of higher TNM stage at time of diagnosis. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These results demonstrate FB in the very elderly has a similar complication rate and diagnostic yield when compared to a younger population, and that malignancy is treated at the same frequency in the very elderly as a younger population. This suggests FB is a safe and efficacious procedure in the very elderly. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Cameron Mclaughlin, Ellis Easterling, Andrew Skabelund No Product/Research Disclosure Information