Utilization Of Bariatric Surgery Research Articles

Racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: an 8-year analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program data

BackgroundRobotic surgery utilization has been increasing across surgical specialties; however, racial disparities in patient access to care and outcomes have been reported. ObjectivesIn this study, we examined racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery over an 8-year period. SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers of excellence across the United States. MethodsThe MBSAQIP database was used to identify adult patients who underwent robotic bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2022. Patients were stratified according to race and ethnicity into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black or African American (AA), Indigenous, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Multivariable analyses were used to assess predictors of robotic surgery use, odds of minor and major complications, prolonged length of stay (prolonged length of stay (pLOS): ≥3 days), readmissions, reoperations, and mortality within 30 days. ResultsOut of 1,288,359 patients included, robotic surgery was utilized in 196,314 patients (15.2%), with a mean age of 44 ± 12 years and 80.6% females. Rates of robotic surgery increased to 30% by 2022. Compared to White patients, Black/AA patients were more likely to undergo robotic surgery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-1.24, P < .001). The safety of robotic bariatric surgery improved for both White and Black patients with decreased odds of major complications, readmissions, reoperations, and pLOS over the study period. However, Black/AA patients were more likely to experience minor and major complications, readmissions and have pLOS compared with White patients in 2022 (aOR:1.26, 95% CI:1.19-1.34, P < .001; aOR:1.22, 95% CI:1.06-1.41, P = .006; aOR:1.44, 95% CI:1.28-1.62, P < .001; aOR:2.26, 95% CI:2.06-2.47, P < .001, respectively). ConclusionThe utilization of robotic bariatric surgery has increased significantly over the past 8 years with continued improvements in its safety profile. While Black/AA patients have improved access to robotic surgery, their clinical outcomes continue to be worse than those of White patients. Efforts to address racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes must remain a priority to achieve health equity.

The Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Results from the Second Kuwait National Bariatric Surgery Database Report

The Utilization of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Results from the Second Kuwait National Bariatric Surgery Database Report

First national analysis of severe obesity hospitalizations in Italy: insights from discharge card database.

Obesity is associated with numerous severe diseases necessitating intensive healthcare for diagnosis and treatment. Most patients with obesity, especially in its severe form, require at least one hospitalization. However, few studies in Italy have assessed the burden of obesity on the National Health System. This study aims to routinely estimate the 'disease burden' by analyzing hospital admissions related to severe obesity. We analyzed the medical records of the Italian national hospital discharge database, including all patients older than 18 years discharged with the diagnosis of 'severe obesity'.' We included patients who underwent bariatric surgery, even without an explicit obesity code, such as laparoscopic restrictive gastric procedures, other stomach operations, and high gastric bypass. Special focus was given to those who underwent abdominal reshaping surgery. The cross-sectional survey PASSI in Italy served as an additional data source to estimate. The phenomenon was described using appropriate indicators, including rates and ratios between rates. Linear regression was employed to analyze trends in standardized rates over time. Between 2014 and 2021, a total of 243,325 patients were discharged with a severe obesity code in Italy. Among these patients, 36.8% underwent at least one bariatric surgery procedure. We investigated the types of bariatric surgery procedures performed. The most frequent procedure was "other operations on the stomach," where sleeve gastrectomy is included which also appears to be steadily increasing during the study period together with the gastric bypass, while the gastric bondage is decreasing over time. These findings underscore the significant burden of severe obesity on Italy's healthcare system, a burden that is progressively increasing. The growing utilization of bariatric surgery suggests an escalating trend toward adopting drastic solutions to combat this health issue.

Update on Endoscopic Treatments for Obesity.

Increased morbidity seen with rising obesity rates continues to place an unheralded burden on our health system. Lack of higher bariatric surgery utilization and limitations with lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy highlights the need for additional therapies for obesity. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMT) are effective, safe treatments for obesity. Current FDA-approved EBMT are confined to gastric modalities while small bowel directed therapies are still considered investigational. This review highlights current modalities of EBMT. Many randomized controlled trials have been performed, including both open label and sham-controlled, which have demonstrated safety and efficacy of EBMT over lifestyle therapy alone. In addition, emerging evidence from clinical experience further supports EBMT for treatment of obesity. Current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of EBMT for obesity treatment in conjunction with lifestyle therapy. They can also be used concurrently with weight loss medications to increase total weight loss.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Reduces the Need for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Obesity and Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: a Predictive Model.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. As with the current obesity epidemic, the incidence of NASH continues to rise. However, the impact of broad utilization of bariatric surgery (BS) for patients with NASH is unknown, particularly in regard to mitigating the need for LT. Markov decision analysis was performed to simulate the lives of 20,000 patients with obesity and concomitant NASH who were deemed ineligible to be waitlisted for LT unless they achieved a body mass index (BMI) < 35kg/m2. Life expectancy following medical weight management (MWM) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were estimated. Base case patients were defined as having NASH without fibrosis and a pre-intervention BMI of 45kg/m2. Sensitivity analysis of initial BMI was performed. Simulated base case analysis patients who underwent SG gained 14.3years of life compared to patients who underwent MWM. One year after weight loss intervention, 9% of simulated MWM patients required LT compared to only 5% of SG patients. Survival benefit for SG was observed above a BMI of 32.2kg/m2. In this predictive model of 20,000 patients with obesity and concomitant NASH, surgical weight loss is associated with a reduction in the progression of NASH, thereby reducing the need for LT. A reduced BMI threshold of 32kg/m2 for BS may offer survival benefit for patients with obesity and NASH.

Utilization and Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery Following the Affordable Care Act in the United States.

The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 marked a pivotal moment in American health care policy, significantly expanding access to health care services. This study aims to explore the relationship between the ACA and the utilization and outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) surgery. Using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database, this retrospective study compares the pre-ACA period (2007-2009) with the post-ACA period (2017-2019), encompassing patients who had RYGB. Multivariable logistic analysis was done accounting for patient's characteristics, comorbidities, and hospital type. In the combined periods, there were 158186 RYGB procedures performed, with 30.0% transpiring in pre-ACA and 70.0% in the post-ACA. Post-ACA, the proportion of uninsured patients decreased from 4.8% to 3.6% (P < .05), while Black patients increased from 12.5% to 18.5% (P < .05). Medicaid-insured patients increased from 6.8% to 18.1% (P < .05), and patients in the poorest income quartile increased from 20% to 26% (P < .05). Patients in the post-ACA period were less likely to have longer hospital stays (OR = .16: 95% CI .16-.17, P < .01), in-hospital mortality (OR = .29: 95% CI .18-.46, P < .01), surgical site infection (OR = .25: 95% CI .21-.29, P < .01), postop hemorrhage (OR = .24: 95% CI .21-.28, P < .01), and anastomotic leak (OR = .14: 95% CI .10-.18, P < .01) than those in the pre-ACA period. Following the implementation of the ACA, utilization of bariatric surgery significantly increased, especially among Black patients, Medicaid beneficiaries, and low-income patients. Moreover, despite the inclusion of more high-risk surgical patients in the post-ACA period, there were better outcomes after surgery.

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Utilization Trends in the United States: Evidence From 2012 to 2021 National Electronic Medical Records Network.

Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past 2 decades yet assessing trends of bariatric surgery utilization in the growing eligible population is lacking. This study aimed to update the trends in bariatric surgery utilization, changes in types of procedures performed, and the characteristics of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the United States, using real-world data. This retrospective descriptive observational study was conducted using the TriNetX, a federated electronic medical records network from 2012 to 2021, for adult patients 18 years old or older who had bariatric surgery. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted to assess patients' demographics and characteristics. Annual secular trend analyses were conducted for the annual rate of bariatric surgery, and the specific procedural types and proportions of laparoscopic surgeries. A steady increase in the number of procedures performed in the United States over the first 6 years of the study, a plateau for the following 2 years, and then a decline in 2020 and 2021 (during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic). The annual rate of bariatric surgery was lowest in 2012 at 59.2 and highest in 2018 at 79.6 surgeries per 100,000 adults. During the study period, 96.2% to 98.8% of procedures performed annually were conducted laparoscopically as opposed to the open technique. Beginning in 2012, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure fell to represent only 17.1% of cases in 2018, along with a sharp decline in the adjustable gastric band (AGB) procedure, replaced by a sharp increase in the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) procedure to represent over 74% of cases in 2018. Bariatric surgery utilization in the United States showed a moderate decline in the number of RYGB procedures, which was offset by a substantial increase in the number of SG procedures and a precipitous drop in the annual number of AGB procedures.

Endorsement of “European Respiratory Society guideline on non-CPAP therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea” by World Sleep Society

Guidelines for management of sleep disorders from national or regional societies provide recommendations that may be regionally appropriate but may not always be practical or relevant in other parts of the world. A task force of experts from the World Sleep Society's (WSS) International Sleep Medicine Guidelines Committee and Sleep and Breathing Disorders Task Force reviewed the European Respiratory Society's guideline on non-CPAP therapies for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with respect to its relevance and applicability to the practice of sleep medicine by sleep specialists in various regions of the world. The task force and the WSS guidelines committee endorsed the European Respiratory Society's guideline with respect to the utilization of bariatric surgery, mandibular advancement devices, positioning devices, myofunctional therapy, hypoglossal neurostimulation, maxilo-mandibular surgery, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for the treatment of OSA. The task force and the WSS guidelines committee noted that there is substantial new evidence for the role of soft tissue, upper airway surgery, not included in the guidelines paper.

National usage of bariatric surgery for class I obesity: an analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.

National and international consensus statements, as well as the National Institutes of Health (NIH), support the use of bariatric surgery for the treatment of class I obesity. Despite this, most payors within the United States limit reimbursement to the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines or a similar adaptation. This study aimed to determine the safety of bariatric surgery in patients with lower BMI compared with standard patients, as well as determine U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery in class I obesity in 2015-2019. A retrospective analysis was performed of the 2015-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients were divided into body mass index cohorts: class I obesity (<35 kg/m2) and severe obesity (≥35 kg/m2). Differences in preoperative patient selection and postoperative outcomes were established, and frequency trends were delineated. Analysis included 760,192 surgeries with 8129 (1%) for patients with class I obesity. The patients with class I obesity were older, more commonly female, and with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, but with higher rates of type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (P < .05). Variation was found for operative time, length of stay, 30-day readmission, and composite morbidity. Minimal annual variation was found for bariatric surgeries performed for patients with class I obesity. The short-term safety of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity was corroborated by this study. Despite consensus statements and robust support, rates of bariatric surgery in patients with class I obesity have failed to increase and remain limited to 1%. This demonstrates the impact of the outdated 1991 NIH guidelines regarding access to care for these potentially life-saving surgeries.

Association of program-specific variation in bariatric surgery volume for Medicaid patients and access to care: a tale of inequality?

Although patients with lower socioeconomic status are at higher risk of obesity, bariatric surgery utilization among patients with Medicaid is low and may be due to program-specific variation in access. Our goal was to compare bariatric surgery programs by percentage of Medicaid cases and to determine if variation in distribution of patients with Medicaid could be linked to adverse outcomes. Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry that included 43 programs performing 97,207 cases between 2006 and 2020, we identified all patients with Medicaid insurance (n = 4780, 4.9%). Bariatric surgery programs were stratified into quartiles according to the percentage of Medicaid cases performed and we compared program-specific characteristics as well as baseline patient characteristics, risk-adjusted complication rates and wait times between top and bottom quartiles. Program-specific distribution of Medicaid cases varied between 0.69 and 22.4%. Programs in the top quartile (n = 11) performed 18,885 cases in total, with a mean of 13% for Medicaid patients, while programs in the bottom quartile (n = 11) performed 32,447 cases in total, with a mean of 1%. Patients undergoing surgery at programs in the top quartile were more likely to be Black (20.2% vs 13.5%, p < 0.0001), have diabetes (35.1% vs 29.5%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (55.1% vs 49.6%, p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (47.6% vs 45.2%, p < 0.0001). Top quartile programs also had higher complication rates (8.4% vs 6.6%, p < 0.0001), extended length of stay (5.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.0001), Emergency Department visits (8.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.0001) and readmissions (4.7% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). Median time from initial evaluation to surgery date was also significantly longer among top quartile programs (200 vs 122days, p < 0.0001). Bariatric surgery programs that perform a higher proportion of Medicaid cases tend to care for patients with greater disease severity who experience delays in care and also require more resource utilization. Improving bariatric surgery utilization among patients with lower socioeconomic status may benefit from insurance standardization and program-centered incentives to improve access and equitable distribution of care.

THU276 The Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Management of Postbariatric Hypoglycemia

Abstract Disclosure: S. Jani: None. S. Bao: None. Postprandial hypoglycemia is a known complication of bariatric surgery. Mixed meal tolerance test performed in these patients often revealed hypoglycemia 1-3 hours after meals. Recent clinical studies using continuous glucose monitors (CGM) have shown the incidence of postbariatric hypoglycemia is much higher than previously identified. In addition to diet modification and medication treatment, CGM has become a more popular and useful tool in managing severe cases. We present a case of using CGM to manage postbariatric hypoglycemia. A 47 year old female with prior history of class 3 obesity treated with sleeve gastrectomy presented with hypoglycemia 2.5 years after her bariatric surgery. She complained of headache, anxiety, dizziness, and fatigue during a routine clinic visit, two hours after consuming a carbohydrate rich meal with simple sugars. Blood glucose was obtained and revealed severe hypoglycemia (glucose 38 mg/dL). This prompted an urgent referral to endocrinology. Review of glucose trends revealed multiple instances of postprandial hypoglycemia. Further labs suggested a low likelihood for insulinoma with no fasting hypoglycemia and HA1C normal at 5.3%. Postprandial hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia was suspected clinically. Dietary modification with multiple small meals consisting of high protein, fiber and complex carbohydrates was recommended. Additionally, she was started on Libre 2 CGM for monitoring and prevention of severe hypoglycemia. Review of her CGM data during follow up visit demonstrated very low incidence of hypoglycemia and absence of severe hypoglycemia. Over time with continued use of her CGM and low incidence of hypoglycemia, she did not require medical therapy. Postprandial hypoglycemia after bariatric surgery can be severe and lead to disabling neuroglycopenic symptoms. With increased utilization of bariatric surgery, these postoperative complications will likely become more prevalent. In a Swedish nationwide study, the prevalence of postbariatric hypoglycemia was close to 0.2% in a cohort of 5040 patients. However, a more recent prospective study with a two-year observation of 333 patients after bariatric surgery using 2-hour glucose tolerance test revealed much higher prevalence of severe postprandial hypoglycemia (25.6%). Hypoglycemia was highest after gastric bypass surgery (32.6%), followed by sleeve gastrectomy (22.6%). Currently, there is no official guideline on utilization of CGM in management of hypoglycemia in nondiabetic patients. This case highlights the role of CGM in managing postbariatric hypoglycemia. CGM provides continuous glucose data, trends and alerts that can be a critical tool for patients to monitor, anticipate and prevent hypoglycemic events. Additionally, the real time data provided by CGM’s can help clinicians identify high risk patients who may benefit from the addition of medications to treat hypoglycemia. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

S1665 Trends in Bariatric Surgery Utilization Among Morbidly Obese Patients - Evidence from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

S1665 Trends in Bariatric Surgery Utilization Among Morbidly Obese Patients - Evidence from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

Is Morbid Obesity a Modifiable Risk Factor in Patients Who Have Severe Knee Osteoarthritis and do Not Have a Formal Perioperative Optimization Program?

BackgroundObesity is considered a modifiable risk factor prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA); however, little data support this hypothesis. Our purpose was to evaluate patients who have a body mass index (BMI) >40 presenting for TKA to determine the incidence of: (1) patients who achieved successful weight loss through nutritional modification or bariatric surgery and (2) patients who underwent TKA over the study period without the presence of a formal optimization program. MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center analysis. Inclusion criteria included: Kellgren and Lawrence grade 3 or 4 knee osteoarthritis, BMI >40 at presentation, and minimum 1-year follow-up (mean 45 months) (N = 624 patients). Demographics, weight loss interventions, pursuit of TKA, maximum BMI change, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores were collected. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated associations of underlying demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes. ResultsThere were 11% of patients who ended up pursuing TKA over the study period. Bariatric surgery was 3.7 times more likely to decrease BMI by minimum 10 compared to nonsurgical intervention (95% confidence interval [CI] [1.7, 8.1]; P = .001). Bariatric surgery resulted in mean BMI change of −3.3 (range, 0 to 22) compared to nonsurgical interventions (−2.6 [range, 0 to 12]) and no intervention (0.4 [range, 0 to 15]; P < .0001). Bariatric surgery patients were 3.1 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 7.1]; P = .008), and nonsurgical interventions were 2.4 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI [1.3, 4.5]; P = .006) compared to no intervention. Non-White patients across all interventions were less likely to experience loss >5 BMI compared to White patients (95% CI [0.2, 0.9]; P = .018). ConclusionsMost patients were unable to reduce BMI more than 5 to 10 over a mean 4-year period without a formal weight optimization program. Utilization of bariatric surgery was most successful compared to nonsurgical interventions, although ultimate pursuit of TKA remained low in all cohorts.

Variation by race/ethnicity in the utilization and weight loss following metabolic bariatric surgery

BackgroundUnderstanding the disparities in utilization and weight loss outcomes of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) by demographics will inform strategies targeting potential treatment gaps and enhance overall clinical obesity treatment. ObjectiveTo identify factors associated with utilization and longitudinal weight loss after MBS. SettingOneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium Database. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study using data from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium between 2012 and 2018. We used logistic regression with intersectional effects to identify factors associated with utilization of MBS. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate longitudinal percentage total weight loss among those who underwent MBS with up to 18 months of follow-up. ResultsAmong 429,821 patients eligible for MBS, 8290 (1.9%) underwent MBS between 2012 and 2018. Intersectional analysis revealed that non-Hispanic Black patients experienced an inferior utilization of MBS compared with non-Hispanic White and Hispanic counterparts, defined by the interaction between race/ethnicity and demographic factors, including male sex, older age, and insurance coverage. In the longitudinal weight loss assessment, 4016 patients (48.3% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 51.7% sleeve gastrectomy) were included. We found that non-Hispanic Black patients experienced significantly less weight loss than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic counterparts. Other factors associated with less weight loss over time included undergoing sleeve gastectomy, male sex, lower preoperative body mass index, and having type 2 diabetes at the time of surgery. ConclusionsOur findings will help to design new strategies focusing on the intersection of race/ethnicity and sociodemographic factors to improve access and effectiveness of MBS.

A Population-Based Cohort Study on Efficacy and Safety of Bariatric Surgery in Young Adults Versus Adults

PurposeBariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity in adults and has shown promising results in young adults. Lack of insight regarding efficacy and safety outcomes might result in delayed bariatric surgery utilization in young adults. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in young adults compared to adults.MethodsThis is a nationwide population-based cohort study utilizing data from the Dutch Audit Treatment of Obesity (DATO). Young adults (aged 18–25 years) and adults (aged 35–55 years) who underwent primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were included. Primary outcome was percentage total weight loss (%TWL) until five years postoperatively.ResultsA total of 2,822 (10.3%) young adults and 24,497 (89.7%) adults were included. The follow-up rates of the young adults were lower up to five years postoperatively (46.2% versus 56.7% three years postoperatively; p < 0.001). Young adults who underwent RYGB showed superior %TWL compared to adults until four years postoperatively (33.0 ± 9.4 versus 31.2 ± 8.7 three years after surgery; p < 0.001). Young adults who underwent SG showed superior %TWL until five years postoperatively (29.9 ± 10.9 versus 26.2 ± 9.7 three years after surgery; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications ≤ 30 days were more prevalent among adults, 5.3% versus 3.5% (p < 0.001). No differences were found in the long term complications. Young adults revealed more improvement of hypertension (93.6% versus 78.9%), dyslipidemia (84.7% versus 69.2%) and musculoskeletal pain (84.6% versus 72.3%).ConclusionBariatric surgery appears to be at least as safe and effective in young adults as in adults. Based on these findings the reluctance towards bariatric surgery in the younger age group seems unfounded.Graphical

Maternal Malnutrition During Pregnancy Among Women with Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

As the utilization of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) continues to rise, it is important to address the nutritional needs of women who had MBS who become pregnant. Not meeting those nutritional needs could lead to complications associated with malnutrition. To better understand the relationship between MBS, pregnancy, and malnutrition, this study sought to determine whether differences exist in the presence of malnutrition during pregnancy in women with a history of MBS compared to women without a history of MBS. This cross-sectional study used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2012 to 2017, which samples 20% of hospital discharges in the USA. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted, and odds rations and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with obesity and MBS as the independent variables and malnutrition during pregnancy as the dependent variable. Covariates included in the multivariate model were age, primary payer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and depression. Compared to women who did not have MBS, women who had MBS had higher odds of malnutrition during pregnancy (aOR = 8.33, 95% CI 7.30-9.50), this result was moderated by racial category (aORBlack = 6.35, 95% CI 4.97-8.13; aORwhite = 8.25, 95% CI 7.00-9.73; aORLatina = 10.93, 95% CI 8.38-14.25). Women with obesity also had higher odds of malnutrition during pregnancy. The increased odds of malnutrition among women with MBS suggests that it is important to consider tailoring nutrition recommendations to address the different nutritional needs of pregnant women who had MBS and may be at risk for malnutrition.

CO189 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Utilization Trends in the United States: Evidence from 2012–2021 National Electronic Medical Records Data

Bariatric surgery has evolved over the past two decades yet assessing trends of bariatric surgery utilization in the growing eligible population is lacking.This study aimed to update the trends in bariatric surgery utilization, changes in types of procedures performed, and the characteristics of patients who underwent bariatric surgery in the US, using real-world data.

A102 Bariatric Surgery Utilization by Black Patients is Increasing with Greatest Gains in Patients with Extreme Obesity

A102 Bariatric Surgery Utilization by Black Patients is Increasing with Greatest Gains in Patients with Extreme Obesity

Cost Variation in Bariatric Surgery Across the United States.

High costs have been cited as a barrier to utilization of bariatric surgery despite the increasing prevalence of obesity in the United States. The present work characterizes the center-level variation and risk factors for increased hospitalization costs following bariatric operations. The 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all adults undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Random effects were estimated using Bayesian methodology and used to rank hospitals by increasing risk-adjusted center-level costs. Of an estimated 687,866 patients at an annual 2435 hospitals, 69.9% underwent SG and 30.1% RYGB, with median costs of $10,900 (interquartile range: 8600-14,000) and $13,600 (10,300-18,000), respectively. Hospitals in the highest tertile of annual SG and RYGB volume were associated with a $1500 (95% CI - 2,100, -800) and $3400 reduction in costs (95% CI -4,200, -2600). Approximately 37.2% (95% CI 35.8-38.6) of variation in hospitalization costs was attributable to the hospital. Hospitals in the top decile of center-level costs were associated with increased odds of developing complications (AOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.40) but not mortality. The present work identified significant interhospital variation in the costs of bariatric operations. Further efforts to standardize costs may enhance the value of bariatric surgical care in the US.

Changes in utilization of robotic bariatric surgery and effect on patient outcomes from 2015-2020.

Robotic surgery is an increasingly popular alternative to laparoscopy for performing bariatric operations. To describe changes in utilization and complication rates of this technique over the last six yearsan analysis of the 2015-2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program participant use files (MBSAQIP PUF) was performed. All patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2020 were included. 1,341,814 robotic and laparoscopic bariatric operations were included. Both the number and proportion performed robotically increased from 2015 (n = 9866, 5.87%) to 2019 (n = 54,356, 13.16%). In 2020, although the number of cases decreased, the proportion performed robotically still increased (17.37%). Yet, there has been no significant change in 30day risk of death (p = 0.946) or infection (p = 0.721). In fact, the risk of any complication has decreased from 8.21% in 2015 to 6.43% in 2020 (p = 0.001). Robotic cases are being increasingly performed on high-risk patients with 77.06% of patients being American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 or higher in 2015 versus 81.03% (p = 0.001) in 2020. Robotic cases are also more likely to be revision operations than laparoscopic cases (12.16% vs 11.4%, p = 0.001). From 2015 to 2020 robotic bariatric surgery became more prevalent yet both complication rates and length of operation decreased suggesting it is an increasingly safe option. The risk of robotic complications remains higher than laparoscopy, however there are significant differences in the patient populations suggesting there may be specific patients and/or operations in which robotic bariatric surgery is being used.