Objective: The trans-cervical transfer of embryos, culture media, and air at the time of uterine transfer creates a point of increased reflection of ultrasound waves. This echogenic complex can be seen to shift within the endometrial cavity shortly after transfer. The purpose of this study is to determine if movement of the echogenic material seen on ultrasound following uterine embryo transfer is useful as a predictor of pregnancy rate.Design: Prospective analysis.Materials/Methods: Ninety-eight patients undergoing uterine transfer between November, 2001 and March, 2002 were evaluated. Transfers included day 3 embryos, day 5 blastocysts, fresh cycles, frozen cycles, donor eggs, and gestational surrogacy cycles. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed at the time of transfer, and repeated 10–20 minutes later. The bladders of patients remained full during transfer and until the second ultrasound. The echogenic point created at time of transfer was measured as a linear distance from the cephalad extent of the endometrial lining.Results: Eighty-four echocomplexes (85.7%) drifted cephalad. One each remained motionless and dispersed, and 12 (12.2%) moved caudad. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 64/98 (65.3%). 56 of 84 (66.7%) of cephalad complexes implanted, whereas 6 of 12 (50%) of caudad complexes were able to implant. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate for echocomplexes moving cephalad (phi=0.488) or caudad (phi=0.234). There was no difference in pregnancy rate for magnitude of drift encountered. Echocomplexes were seen even in the four embryo transfers that were done without using the air-transfer method as described elsewhere. The patients that had dispersed or stationary echocomplexes both have ongoing pregnancies.Conclusions: Although the nature of the physical interactions between embryos, media, and air bubbles may not be well known, the presence, direction, and magnitude of drifting transfer material do not appear to correlate with pregnancy rate, even as indirect indicators. The echogenic focus is not entirely dependent on the presence of air in the transfer catheter, and its disappearance does not necessarily imply that the embryos have been expelled from the uterus. Since pregnancies were generated following uterine transfer, persistence of the echogenic transfer material appears consistent with short-term retention of the embryos within the uterus following transfer.Supported by: None. Objective: The trans-cervical transfer of embryos, culture media, and air at the time of uterine transfer creates a point of increased reflection of ultrasound waves. This echogenic complex can be seen to shift within the endometrial cavity shortly after transfer. The purpose of this study is to determine if movement of the echogenic material seen on ultrasound following uterine embryo transfer is useful as a predictor of pregnancy rate. Design: Prospective analysis. Materials/Methods: Ninety-eight patients undergoing uterine transfer between November, 2001 and March, 2002 were evaluated. Transfers included day 3 embryos, day 5 blastocysts, fresh cycles, frozen cycles, donor eggs, and gestational surrogacy cycles. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed at the time of transfer, and repeated 10–20 minutes later. The bladders of patients remained full during transfer and until the second ultrasound. The echogenic point created at time of transfer was measured as a linear distance from the cephalad extent of the endometrial lining. Results: Eighty-four echocomplexes (85.7%) drifted cephalad. One each remained motionless and dispersed, and 12 (12.2%) moved caudad. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 64/98 (65.3%). 56 of 84 (66.7%) of cephalad complexes implanted, whereas 6 of 12 (50%) of caudad complexes were able to implant. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate for echocomplexes moving cephalad (phi=0.488) or caudad (phi=0.234). There was no difference in pregnancy rate for magnitude of drift encountered. Echocomplexes were seen even in the four embryo transfers that were done without using the air-transfer method as described elsewhere. The patients that had dispersed or stationary echocomplexes both have ongoing pregnancies. Conclusions: Although the nature of the physical interactions between embryos, media, and air bubbles may not be well known, the presence, direction, and magnitude of drifting transfer material do not appear to correlate with pregnancy rate, even as indirect indicators. The echogenic focus is not entirely dependent on the presence of air in the transfer catheter, and its disappearance does not necessarily imply that the embryos have been expelled from the uterus. Since pregnancies were generated following uterine transfer, persistence of the echogenic transfer material appears consistent with short-term retention of the embryos within the uterus following transfer. Supported by: None.
Read full abstract