The numerous published studies addressing parkinsonian patients’ motor follow-up after surgery for deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus bring to the fore several methodological problems that we consider of major importance. Assessing motor function in these patients is a complex task. They must be preoperatively assessed with and without oral medication, and postoperatively assessed with and without oral medication and with the stimulators turned on and turned off, hence under four conditions MED OFF/STIM OFF, MED ON/STIM OFF, MED OFF/STIM ON, and MED ON/STIM ON. The four conditions combined in various ways offer scope for numerous comparisons yielding a wealth of information. At the same time, there are several problems in clinical practice, which suggest the need to reappraise the existing patient assessment protocols. The Core Assessment Program for Surgical Interventional Therapies in Parkinson’s disease (CAPSIT-PD) recommendations define MED ON as the motor state assessed after the patient takes the usual morning levodopa dose [1]. Because morning doses often vary from patient to patient, this definition introduces inherent interpatient variability that is hard to eliminate. The frequent changes in a patient’s morning dose after the intervention also lead to intrapatient variability. The variability in the morning dose makes it difficult to compare the motor benefits achieved by preoperative oral therapy and postoperative oral therapy and stimulation (MED ON vs. MED ON-STIM ON), a core comparison in the postoperative follow-up of parkinsonian patients after deep-brain stimulation. One way to render this comparison fully homogeneous would be to maintain oral therapy quantitatively unchanged. For example, a patient taking 100 mg of levodopa preoperatively would be assessed postoperatively while taking 100 mg even if they actually require a lower dose. This solution might nevertheless be only partly applicable given that parkinsonian patients in advanced stage of disease often take levodopa in large amounts, the preoperative morning dose often reaching 200 mg, an amount inducing supramaximal post-synaptic dopaminergic receptor stimulation. Using the same levodopa dose preoperatively and postoperatively under these conditions would obviously be meaningless insofar as the dopamine-receptor stimulation induced by a supramaximal levodopa dose could bring no further meaningful motor benefit. The difficulties encountered in clinical practice also reflect differences in patient assessment. Whereas some studies assess patients after they receive their usual morning dose [2, 3], others define MED ON as the motor state reached after patients take 150% of the usual morning dose [4–6]. Yet other studies refer to the best ON medication motor state [7]. Difficulties arise also in assessing patients in the OFF medication motor state. According to the CAPSIT-PD recommendations, patients reach the OFF medication motor state 12 h after dopaminergic withdrawal [1]. Although most studies follow this recommendation, some variability exists given that the time elapsing after withdrawing therapy ranges from 8 to 12 h [5], 10 to 12 h [2], to at least 12 h or exactly 12 h [4, 6, 7]. A 12-h interval seems an acceptable compromise that in patients with advanced disease who are fully G. Caranci (&) F. Lena N. Modugno S. Ruggieri P. Romanelli M. Manfredi Centre for Parkinson’s Disease, IRCCS Neuromed Institute, via Atinense 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy e-mail: giovannicaranci@tiscali.it
Read full abstract