User Fee Exemption Research Articles

Strengthening Health Systems in Conflict: Evidence-Based Policies for Quality Care in Yemen

Yemen’s health system has faced formidable obstacles due to the enduring conflict since 2014, resulting in compromised infrastructure, disrupted services, and exacerbated vulnerabilities. This discourse meticulously analyzes the primary health system challenges in Yemen within the framework of the World Health Organization’s six pillars. It subsequently presents evidence-based policy recommendations to enhance Yemen’s health system and ensure the provision of high-quality and equitable care. In terms of service delivery, it suggests augmenting the presence of community health workers, leveraging mobile health technology, rehabilitating facilities, and improving emergency obstetric care. Regarding the health workforce, it proposes financing mechanisms for adequate remuneration, task-shifting strategies, embracing telemedicine, and fostering partnerships with universities. To strengthen information systems, it advocates for the enhancement of facility reporting, the implementation of national surveys, the utilization of mobile phone surveys, and the adoption of robust health information software. Regarding essential medicines, it recommends reorganizing regulations pertaining to selection, procurement, storage, and distribution. For health financing, it highlights the importance of increasing domestic budget allocation, implementing user fee exemptions, adopting performance-based financing mechanisms, and strengthening financial management systems. Last, in terms of governance, it emphasizes the need for transparent and accountable leadership, effective coordination mechanisms, and inclusive policy-making processes. Yemen requires sustained political commitment and adequate resources to facilitate the comprehensive reconstruction of its health system.

Has the Gratuité policy reduced inequities in geographic access to antenatal care in Burkina Faso? Evidence from facility-based data from 2014 to 2022.

Evidence shows that user fee exemption policies improve the use of maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) services. However, addressing the cost of care is only one barrier to accessing MNCH services. Poor geographic accessibility relating to distance is another. Our objective in this study was to assess the effect of a user fee exemption policy in Burkina Faso (Gratuité) on antenatal care (ANC) use, considering distance to health facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional study with sub-analysis by intervention period to compare utilization of ANC services (outcome of interest) in pregnant women who used the service in the context of the Gratuité user fee exemption policy and those who did not, in Manga district, Burkina Faso. Dependent variables included were socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric history, and distance to the lower-level health facility (known as Centre de Santé et Promotion Sociale) in which care was sort. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed across the entire population, within those who used ANC before the policy and after its inception. For women who used services before the Gratuité policy was introduced, those living 5-9 km were almost twice (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.17-3.21) more likely to have their first ANC visit (ANC1) in the first trimester compared to those living <5 km of the nearest health facility. After the policy was introduced, women living 5-9 km and >10 km from the nearest facility were almost twice (OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.14-3.05) and over twice (OR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.20-3.48) more likely respectively to use ANC1 in the first trimester compared to those living within 5 km of the nearest health facility. Also, women living over 10 km from the nearest facility were 1.29 times (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.00-1.66) more likely to have 4+ ANC than those living less than 5 km from the nearest health facility. Insofar as the financial barrier to ANC has been lifted and the geographical barrier reduced for the populations that live farther away from services through the Gratuité policy, then the Burkinabé government must make efforts to sustain the policy and ensure that benefits of the policy reach the targeted and its gains maximized.

Barriers to access of maternal health commodities among pregnant women in public health facilities in Ubungo Municipal Council, Tanzania.

Access to maternal health commodities improves maternal outcome and reduce maternal deaths. Tanzania has put in place the fee exemption policy for mothers to access maternal health commodities for free, however, the implementation of user fee exemption has been challenging. Therefore, this study explored the barriers to access of maternal health commodities among pregnant women in public health facilities at Ubungo Municipal Council, Tanzania. This was a descriptive qualitative study conducted from January to February 2023. Both focus group discussions and key informant interviews were conducted. These involved 72 pregnant women and 40 health care providers respectively. A purposive sampling technique was used to selected facilities and study participants. Thematic analysis was used to analysis data. Findings from this study indicated that fear of stigma and discrimination, decision-making autonomy, additional costs and stock out of health commodities were the main barriers to accessing maternal health commodities. Furthermore, both pregnant women and health care providers reported that shortage of health commodities and the inadequacy of service providers, which led to long waiting times, also hinder access to health commodities. Improving health commodities availability, and increasing the number of service providers are important factors to consider to improve access to maternal health commodities. In addition, factors such as fear of stigma and discrimination should also be addressed to improve maternal health.

Financing for equity for women's, children's and adolescents' health in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

Over the past few decades, the world has witnessed considerable progress in women's, children's and adolescents' health (WCAH) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Yet deep inequities remain between and within countries. This scoping review aims to map financing interventions and measures to improve equity in WCAH in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting such reviews as well as the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for reporting scoping reviews. We searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Index Medicus, and relevant websites. The selection process was conducted in duplicate and independently. Out of 26 355 citations identified from electronic databases, relevant website searches and stakeholders' consultations, 413 studies were included in the final review. Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) (22.3%), health insurance (21.4%), user fee exemptions (18.1%) and vouchers (16.9%) were the most reported financial interventions and measures. The majority were targeted at women (57%) and children (21%) with others targeting adolescents (2.7%) and newborns (0.7%). The findings highlighted that CCTs, voucher programs and various insurance schemes can improve the utilization of maternal and child health services for the poor and the disadvantaged, and improve mortality and morbidity rates. However, multiple implementation challenges impact the effectiveness of these programmes. Some studies suggested that financial interventions alone would not be sufficient to achieve equity in health coverage among those of a lower income and those residing in remote regions. This review provides evidence on financing interventions to address the health needs of the most vulnerable communities. It can be used to inform the design of equitable health financing policies and health system reform efforts that are essential to moving towards universal health coverage (UHC). By also unveiling the knowledge gaps, it can be used to inform future research on financing interventions and measures to improve equity when addressing WCAH in LMICs.

User Fee Exemption Policy Significantly Improved Adherence to Maternal Health Service Utilization in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Increasing free and skilled deliveryisa top priority in the global effortto reducematernal and newborn mortality. Reducing user-fees through exemption policy has contributed to universal health coverage. However, there is scant evidence regarding the effect of exempted maternal services on adherence to utilization in Ethiopia. Thus, this study aimed to assess the effect of fee exemption policy on adherence to maternal health service utilization and its predictors. A community-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Bahir Dar City. A two-stage multistage sampling was employed; 497 women participated. Data were collected by face-to-face interview; entered and cleaned using Epi-Data 3.1. SPSS version 25 was used for further analysis. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were computed to assess the association between explanatory and outcome variables. An adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to interpret the degree of association. The effect of fee exemption policy on adherence to maternal health service utilization was measured by propensity score matching. The overall adherence to maternal service utilization was 54.2%. Factors associated with adherence to maternal health service utilization were pregnancy complications [AOR: 4.1, 95% CI (2.32, 7.28)], secondary and above education [AOR: 4.6, 95% CI (1.38, 15.08)], early ANC1 booking [AOR: 3.1, 95% CI (1.83, 5.16)], autonomous women [AOR: 2.1, 95% CI (1.02, 4.39)], user fee exemption [AOR: 2.3, 95% CI (1.20, 4.47)] and high parity [AOR: 0.39, 95% CI (0.2, 0.75)]. User fee exemption induced a 22.7% increment in adherence to maternal service utilization (ATET=0.227, t=2.13). User fee exemption policy significantly improved adherence to maternal health service utilization. Promoting a fee exemption policy through third-party financing can enhance maternal health service utilization adherence in hard-to-reach settings of Ethiopia by targeting mothers with higher pregnancies, no complications, no autonomy, and less education.

Effectiveness of the Gratuité user fee exemption policy on utilization and outcomes of maternal, newborn and child health services in conflict-affected districts of Burkina Faso from 2013 to 2018: a pre-post analysis

BackgroundEvidence on effectiveness of user fee exemption policies targeting maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) services is limited for conflict-affected settings. In Burkina Faso, a country that has had its fair share of conflicts, user fee exemption policies have been piloted since 2008 and implemented along with a national government-led user fee reduction policy (‘SONU’: Soins Obstétricaux et Néonataux d'Urgence). In 2016, the government transitioned the entire country to a user fee exemption policy known as Gratuité. Our study objective was to assess the effect of the policy on the utilization and outcomes of MNCH services in conflict-affected districts of Burkina Faso.MethodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental study comparing four conflict-affected districts which had the user fee exemption pilot along with SONU before transitioning to Gratuité (comparator) with four other districts with similar characteristics, which had only SONU before transitioning (intervention). A difference-in-difference approach was initiated using data from 42 months before and 30 months after implementation. Specifically, we compared utilization rates for MNCH services, including antenatal care (ANC), facility delivery, postnatal care (PNC) and consultation for malaria. We reported the coefficient, including a 95% confidence interval (CI), p value, and the parallel trends test.ResultsGratuité led to significant increases in rates of 6th day PNC visits for women (Coeff 0.15; 95% CI 0.01–0.29), new consultations in children < 1 year (Coeff 1.80; 95% CI 1.13–2.47, p < 0.001), new consultations in children 1–4 years (Coeff 0.81; 95% CI 0.50–1.13, p = 0.001), and uncomplicated malaria cases treated in children < 5 years (Coeff 0.59; 95% CI 0.44–0.73, p < 0.001). Other service utilization indicators investigated, including ANC1 and ANC5+ rates, did not show any statistically significant positive upward trend. Also, the rates of facility delivery, 6th hour and 6th week postnatal visits were found to have increased more in intervention areas compared to control areas, but these were not statistically significant.ConclusionsOur study shows that, even in conflict-affected areas, the Gratuité policy significantly influences MNCH service utilization. There is a strong case for continued funding of the user fee exemption policy to ensure that gains are not reversed, especially if the conflict ceases to abate.

Stakeholder perceptions and experiences from the implementation of the Gratuité user fee exemption policy in Burkina Faso: a qualitative study

BackgroundIn 2016, the Gratuité policy was initiated by the Government of Burkina Faso to remove user fees for maternal, newborn, and child Health (MNCH) services. Since its inception, there has not been any systematic capture of experiences of stakeholders as it relates to the policy. Our objective was to understand the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders regarding the implementation of the Gratuité policy.MethodsWe used key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) to engage national and sub-national stakeholders in the Centre and Hauts-Bassin regions. Participants included policymakers, civil servants, researchers, non-governmental organizations in charge of monitoring the policy, skilled health personnel, health facility managers, and women who used MNCH services before and after the policy implementation. Topic guides aided sessions, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used for data synthesis.ResultsThere were five key themes emerging. First, majority of stakeholders have a positive perception of the Gratuité policy. Its implementation approach is deemed to have strengths including government leadership, multi-stakeholder involvement, robust internal capacity, and external monitoring. However, collateral shortage of financial and human resources, misuse of services, delays in reimbursement, political instability and health system shocks were highlighted as concerns that compromise the government's objective of achieving universal health coverage (UHC). However, many beneficiaries were satisfied at the point of use of MNHC services, though Gratuité did not always mean free to the service users. Broadly, there was consensus that the Gratuité policy has contributed to improvements in health-seeking behavior, access, and utilization of services, especially for children. However, the reported higher utilization is leading to some perceived increased workload and altered health worker attitude.ConclusionsThere is a general perception that the Gratuité policy is achieving what it set out to do, which is to increase access to care by removing financial barriers. While stakeholders recognized the intention and value of the Gratuité policy, and many beneficiaries were satisfied at the point of use, inefficiencies in its implementation undermines progress. As the country moves towards the goal of realizing UHC, reliable investment in the Gratuité policy is needed.

User fee exemption and malaria treatment-seeking for children under five in a Cameroonian health district: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundIn Cameroon, malaria contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of children under 5 years old. In order to encourage adequate treatment-seeking in health facilities, user fee exemptions for malaria treatment have been instituted. However, many children are still brought to health facilities in the late stage of severe malaria. This study sought to determine the factors affecting the hospital treatment-seeking time of guardians of children under 5 years within the context of this user fee exemption.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study conducted at three randomly selected health facilities of the Buea Health District. A pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data on the treatment-seeking behaviour and time of guardians, as well as potential predictors of this time. Hospital treatment sought after 24 h of noticing symptoms was denoted as delayed. Continuous variables were described using medians while categorical variables were described using percentages. A multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the factors affecting malaria treatment-seeking time of guardians. All statistical tests were done at a 95% confidence interval.ResultsMost of the guardians made use of pre-hospital treatments, with self-medication being practiced by 39.7% (95% CI 35.1–44.3%) of them. A total of 193 (49.5%) guardians delayed seeking treatment at health facilities. Reasons for delay included financial constraints and watchful waiting at home, during which guardians waited and hoped their child could get better without requiring medicines. Guardians with estimated monthly household incomes denoted as low/middle were significantly more likely (AOR 3.794; 95% CI 2.125–6.774) to delay seeking hospital treatment. The occupation of guardians was another significant determinant of treatment-seeking time (AOR 0.042; 95% CI 0.003–0.607). Also, guardians with tertiary education were less likely (AOR 0.315; 95% CI 0.107–0.927) to delay seeking hospital treatment.ConclusionsThis study suggests that despite user fee exemption, other factors such as educational and income levels of guardians affect malaria treatment-seeking time for children aged under five. Therefore, these factors should be considered when enacting policies aimed at increasing access of children to health facilities.

Mental health coverage for forced migrants: Managing failure as everyday governance in the public and NGO sectors in England.

High-income countries (HICs) which are said to have "reached" universal health coverage (UHC) typically still have coverage gaps, due to both formal policies and informal barriers which result in "hypothetical access". In England, a user fee exemption has in principle made access to treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health conditions thought to be caused by certain forms of violence universal, regardless of immigration status. This study explores the everyday governance of this mental health coverage for forced migrants in the English National Health Service (NHS) and NGO sector. Fieldwork was conducted in two waves, in 2015-2016 and 2019-2021, including six months of participant observation in an NGO and 21 semi-structured interviews with psy professionals across 16 NHS and NGO service providers. Further interviews were conducted with mental health commissioners and policymakers, as well as analysis of grey literature. Despite being formally covered for certain types of mental health care, in practice asylum seekers and undocumented migrants were often excluded by NHS providers. Undocumented migrants were also often excluded by NGO providers. Several rationalities linked discursive fields to practices developed by psy professionals and other street-level bureaucrats to govern coverage, in a process of "managing failure". These rationalities are presented under three paired themes which draw attention to tensions and resistance in the governance of coverage: medicalisation and biolegitimacy; austerity and ethico-politics; and differential racialisation and decolonisation. Rationalities were associated with strategies and tactics such as social triage, clinical advocacy, obfuscation, evidence-based advocacy and silencing critique. The concept of "health coverage assemblage" is introduced to explain the complex, unstable, contingent and fragmented nature of UHC policies and programmes. Misrecognition and underestimation of the everyday work of health professionals in promoting, resisting and reproducing diverse rationalities within the assemblage may lead to missed opportunities for reform.

How a supply-side intervention can help to increase caesarean section rates in Burkina Faso facilities-Evidence from an interrupted time-series analysis using routine health data.

In Burkina Faso, only 2.1% of women give birth by caesarean section (CS). To improve the use of maternal health services during pregnancy and childbirth, many interventions were implemented during the 2010s including performance-based financing (PBF) and a free maternal health care policy (the gratuité). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of a supply-side intervention (PBF) combined with a demand-side intervention (gratuité) on institutional CS rates in Burkina Faso. We used routine health data from all the public health facilities in 21 districts (10 that implemented PBF and 11 that did not) from January 2013 to September 2017. We analysed CS rates as the proportion of CS performed out of all facility-based deliveries (FBD) that occurred in the district. We performed an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to evaluate the impact of PBF alone and then in conjunction with the gratuité on institutional CS rates. CS rates in Burkina Faso increased slightly between January 2013 and September 2017 in all districts. After the introduction of PBF, the increase of CS rates was higher in intervention than in non-intervention districts. However, after the introduction of the gratuité, CS rates decreased in all districts, independently of the PBF intervention. In 2017, despite high FBD rates in Burkina Faso as well as the PBF intervention and the gratuité, less than 3% of women who gave birth in a health facility did so by CS. Our study shows that the positive PBF effects were not sustained in a context of user fee exemption.

Developing and implementing National Health Insurance: learnings from the first try in Benin

In 2008, Benin government launched a national health insurance scheme, but this had been suspended in 2017. We aim to understand how existing ideas and institutions, stakeholders’ behaviour and their...

Health Insurance Coverage, Socioeconomic Status of Women, and Antenatal Care Utilization in Ghana

Promoting antenatal care (ANC) utilization is one of the key drivers of the Safe Motherhood Initiative aimed at improving maternal health in low-income countries. The study sought to examine the effects of health insurance coverage and socioeconomic status of women on antenatal care utilization in Ghana. The study used cross-sectional data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS). Negative binomial and binary logistic regression models were applied. The results showed that women covered with national health insurance were more likely to have more antenatal care visits and adequate and timely antenatal care. The results showed that having an advanced age, attaining secondary or higher-level education, being employed, being in the richest wealth quintile, and having an active national health insurance subscription during pregnancy significantly predicted ANC utilization. The study suggests that if interventions aimed at reducing the burden of prenatal care are not implemented, coupled with women’s economic empowerment to cater to the cost of prenatal care, the benefits of the ANC associated with early and adequate ANC services may not optimally be achieved. That aside, ANC services in Ghana are technically ‘free’ through the user-fee exemption policy under the NHIS. However, socioeconomic factors still largely determine women’s decisions to utilize maternal health services.

Universal Health Coverage: A Catalyst for Achieving 2030 Sustainable Development Goals

Background: Achieving Universal Health Coverage is one of the prerequisites for improved health outcomes, a decline in the rate of Impoverishment due to health expenditure (IHE), and achieving Sustainable Development Goals 1,2, and 3. While some countries (primarily those in Sub-Saharan Africa) are still battling to achieve Health Coverage for their populations, Western countries have achieved this feat using several strategies and models. This study aims to identify Universal Health Coverage implementation strategies adopted by different countries and how the strategies have contributed to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal targets.&#x0D; Method: A systematic literature review was employed, and a total of 10 studies conducted met our inclusion criteria. The sensitive search strategy was employed. The search was conducted with the use of appropriate keywords (guided by the research objective) in different databases such as MEDLINE (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), ProQuest, AMED (EBSCO), and PsycINFO. Articles were also retrieved through a manual search on google scholar. The search was also guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome PICO framework.&#x0D; Findings: Studies identified health insurance schemes for the unemployed, self-employed, and private sector employees and implementation of user fee exemption or subsidized medical bills for a population sub-group deemed vulnerable as Universal Health Coverage implementation strategies in different countries. These strategies significantly increased health coverage and improved health outcomes as well.&#x0D; Conclusion and Recommendations: The majority of countries in the sub-Saharan Africa region are yet to achieve Universal Health Coverage, this will pose a challenge to their ability to attain the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The study recommends that tested strategies such as improved health financing, sustainable health system strengthening, and a holistic approach to quality of healthcare services should be contextualized and implemented in countries that are yet to achieve Universal health coverage for their populations.

Perceptions of the Exemption Policy on Maternal Mothers Healthcare Service Delivery in Iringa Municipality, Tanzania

This article presents perceptions on the effect of the user-fees exemption policy on maternal mothers in Iringa Municipality, in Iringa, Tanzania. It specifically presents outcomes of the policy on healthcare services offered to maternal mothers. The study employed a cross-sectional research design, with a purposively selected sample of 74 respondents. Data was collected through questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and documentary review; and analysed descriptively and thematically. The results indicated that, on the one hand, the policy increased equal chances in accessing health services among maternal mothers; increased the number of deliveries in health facilities; reduced the number of maternal deaths and uncertainty of delivery for maternal mothers; and improved chances of survival and the overall health of maternal mothers and their babies. On the other hand, the policy tempted unlawful payments; increased household’s dependency on the government; increased municipal expenditure; led to the shortage of beds, drugs as well as skilled health workers; and invited indirect costs. Despite all these challenges, the exemption policy was important as access to health services for maternal mothers improved greatly. Based on the study results, it is recommended that unlawful payments should be controlled; municipal expenditure budget, hospital beds, drugs, and skilled health workers be increased; and indirect costs be minimized.

Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge and Beliefs on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cesarean Section: A Mixed-Methods Study in Benin.

A low adherence to recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis has been reported worldwide. Since 2009, cesarean sections have been performed under user fee exemption in Benin with a free kit containing the required supplies and antibiotics for prophylaxis. Despite the kit, the level of antibiotic prophylaxis achievement remains low. We conducted a convergent parallel design study in 2017 using a self-administered questionnaire and interviews to assess the knowledge and explore the beliefs of healthcare professionals regarding antibiotic prophylaxis in three hospitals. Of the 35 participants, 33 filled out the questionnaire. Based on the five conventional criteria of antibiotic prophylaxis, the mean level of knowledge was 3.3 out of 5, and only 15.2% scored 5 out of 5. From the verbatim of 19 interviewees, determinants such as suboptimal patient status health, low confidence in antibiotics, some disagreement with the policy, inappropriate infrastructures and limited financial resources in hospitals, poor management of the policy in the central level, and patient refusal to buy antibiotics can explain poor practices. Because of the dysfunction at these levels, the patient becomes the major determinant of adequate antibiotic prophylaxis. Policymakers have to consider these determinants for improving antibiotic prophylaxis in a way that ensures patient safety and reduces the incidence of antimicrobial resistance.

Antibiotic Usage in Patients Having Undergone Caesarean Section: A Three-Level Study in Benin.

The intense use and misuse of antibiotics is undoubtedly the main factor associated with the high numbers of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic and commensal bacteria worldwide. In low-income countries, this misuse and overuse is widespread, with great consequences at the personal and global levels. In the context of user fee exemptions in caesarean sections, we performed a descriptive study in women to assess the use of antibiotics on three levels—antenatal, during caesarean section, and postpartum—in four Beninese hospitals. Out of the 141 women included, 56.7% were using antibiotics. More than the half (71.3%) were taking more than one antibiotic, either for a long time or in acute treatment. In prophylaxis, the timing, dose, and duration of administration were not correctly achieved. Only 31.2% of women received optimal antibiotic prophylaxis. Various antibiotics including broad-spectrum molecules were used in the patients after caesarean section. The use of antibiotics was improper on the three levels studied. The high rate of self-administered antibiotics, the poor achievement of antibiotic prophylaxis, and the postpartum overuse of antibiotics showed a poor quality of care provided in pregnancy. A national policy is essential to improve the use of antibiotics by the general public as well as by professionals.

Quality disparity in terms of clients’ satisfaction with selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia: Meta-analysis

IntroductionIn Ethiopia; even though utilization of health care services has been improved after the introduction of user fee exemption, little is known about the quality of the services. There are fragmented studies on the output dimension of quality of health care services particularly on clients’ satisfaction. Therefore this study aims to assess overall quality (in terms of clients’ satisfaction) and its disparity among users of selected exempted health care services provided in Ethiopia. MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was used to undertake this study. Both published and unpublished articles conducted in Ethiopia on the quality of health care services in terms of clients’ satisfaction dimensions were searched. A total of 750 articles were retrieved through international databases (Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library) and national digital library repositories (Addis Ababa University’s digital library repository); 703 of which were excluded while only 47 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The search for articles was conducted during the period 03 December 2019 to 28 January 2020. For methodological qualities of the included articles assessment, a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies was used. R version 3.6.1 and stata version 14 soft wares were used for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates. The I2 tests were used to assess the heterogeneity of the studies. ResultsThe pooled overall prevalence of included 47 studies revealed that clients’ satisfaction among users of selected exempted health care services in Ethiopia was 70% (95% CI: 64, 74%). In subgroup analysis; the lowest prevalence of clients’ satisfaction was observed among users of obstetrics maternal health care services with the prevalence of 65.04% (95% CI: 57.50, 72.58). ConclusionThis study found that more than one-third of respondents; was not satisfied with exempted health care services. There is slight difference in satisfaction of clients across type of exempted health care services and regions. Policy and decision makers in Ethiopia shall design strategies to optimize quality of health care services besides exemption of its costs.it is also strongly recommend that a special emphasis shall be given to obstetric health care services provision. Moreover, concerned stakeholders’ (ministry of health, etc.) should strengthen compassionate respectful care provision in public health facilities; beside to removing user fees.

No impact of performance-based financing on the availability of essential medicines in Burkina Faso: A mixed-methods study.

Access to safe, effective, and affordable essential medicines (EM) is critical to quality health services and as such has played a key role in innovative health system strengthening approaches such as Performance-based Financing (PBF). Available literature indicates that PBF can improve EM availability, but has not done so consistently in the past. Qualitative explorations of the reasons are yet scarce. We contribute to expanding the literature by estimating the impact of PBF on EM availability and stockout in Burkina Faso and investigating mechanisms of and barriers to change. The study used an explanatory mixed methods design. The quantitative study component followed a quasi-experimental design (difference-in-differences), comparing how EM availability and stockout had changed three years after implementation in 12 PBF and in 12 control districts. Qualitative data was collected from purposely selected policy and implementation stakeholders at all levels of the health system and community, using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, and explored using deductive coding and thematic analysis. We found no impact of PBF on EM availability and stockouts in the quantitative data. Qualitative narratives converge in that EM supply had increased as a result of PBF, albeit not fully satisfactorily and sustainably so. Reasons include persisting contextual challenges, most importantly a public medicine procurement monopoly; design challenges, specifically a disconnect and disbalance in incentive levels between service provision and service quality indicators; implementation challenges including payment delays, issues around performance verification, and insufficient implementation of activities to strengthen stock management skills; and concurrently implemented policies, most importantly a national user fee exemption for children and pregnant women half way through the impact evaluation period. The case of PBF and EM availability in Burkina Faso illustrates the difficulty of incentivizing and effecting holistic change in EM availability in the presence of strong contextual constraints and powerful concurrent policies.

User fee removal for the poor: a qualitative study to explore policies for social health assistance in Iran

IntroductionRemoval of user fee for vulnerable people reduces the financial barriers associated with healthcare payments, which, in turn, improves health outcomes and promotes health equity. This study sought to provide policy strategies to reduce user fee at the point of service delivery for the poor in Iran.MethodsThis is a qualitative study carried out in 2018. The purposive sampling method was applied, and 33 experts with relevant and valuable experiences and maximum variation to obtain representativeness and rich data were interviewed. Trustworthiness criteria were used to assure the quality of the results. The data were analyzed based on thematic analysis using the MAXQDA10 software.ResultsThe most important issue regarding financial protection against user fee for the poor in Iran is policy integration and cohesion. Differences in access to financial support for user fee coverage among different groups of the poor have led to inequalities in access and financial protection among the poor. The suggested protection policies against the user fee at the point of service delivery in Iran can be categorized into three main categories: 1) basic health social insurance instruments, 2) free health services to the poor outside of the health insurance system, and 3) complementary insurance mechanisms.ConclusionImplementing a cohesive social assistance policy for all disadvantaged groups is needed to address inequalities in financial protection against user fee payment among the poor in Iran. Reducing user fee through mechanisms such as deductible cap, stop-loss, variable user fee and sliding fee scale can improve financial protection and enhance healthcare utilization among the poor. A user fee exemption is not enough to remove barriers to access to service for the poor, as other costs such as transportation expenditures and informal payments also put financial pressure on them. Therefore, financial support for the poor should be designed in a comprehensive protection package to reduce out-of-pocket payments for healthcare services, and indirect costs associated with healthcare utilization.

Women\u2019s decision-making power in a context of free reproductive healthcare and family planning in rural Burkina Faso

BackgroundIn 2016, the national user fee exemption policy for women and children under five was introduced in Burkina Faso. It covers most reproductive healthcare services for women including prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care. In subsequent years, the policy was gradually extended to include family planning. While studies have shown that user fee abolition policies increase visits to health centers and improve access to reproductive healthcare and family planning, there are also indications that other barriers remain, notably women’s lack of decision-making power. The objective of the study is to investigate women’s decision-making power regarding access to reproductive health and family planning in a context of free healthcare in rural Burkina Faso.MethodsA descriptive qualitative study was carried out in rural areas of the Cascades and Center-West regions. Qualitative data were collected using individual semi-structured interviews (n = 20 participants) and focus groups (n = 15 participants) with Burkinabe women of childbearing age, their husbands, and key informants in the community. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsA conceptual framework describing women’s participation in the decision-making process was built from the analysis. Results show that the user fee exemption policy contributes to improving access to reproductive care and family planning by facilitating the negotiation processes between women and their families within households. However, social norms and gender inequalities still limit women’s decision-making power.ConclusionIn light of these results, courses of action that go beyond the user fee exemption policy should be considered to improve women’s decision-making power in matters of health, particularly with regard to family planning. Interventions that involve men and community members may be necessary to challenge the social norms, which act as determinants of women’s health and empowerment.