User Facility Device Experience Database Research Articles

Intraocular Inflammation with faricimab: insights from Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Intraocular Inflammation with faricimab: insights from Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Major Clinical Adverse Events of Breast Implant in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Search the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database to collect information on adverse events of breast implant. We analyzed the local complications and the breast implant illness (BII) of silicone breast implants, as well as saline breast implants separately, aim to provide a reference for women who want to breast augmentation. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for events reports related to the breast implant between July 1, 2012, and June 30, 2022. Event year and reporting year were summarized. Patient problem was collected and analyzed to distinguish between local complications and BII. A total of 108,728 adverse events in the past 3 years were analyzed, silicone breast implants accounted for 62.1% and saline breast implants accounted for 37.9%. The most common local complication of women receiving silicone breast implants was "Capsular Contracture," accounting for 48.73%. However, the incidence of "capsular contracture" in women who received saline breast implants was only 17.49%. The most common BII was "fatigue/weakness" in both women receiving 2 different breast implants, 17.20% in women receiving silicone breast implants and 24.71% in women receiving saline breast implants. Of note, in all the reports, there was a wide variation in the timing of reporting as compared with the timing of the adverse event. Although the adverse events of breast implant cannot completely be determined from this study, we provide a reference for women who want to get breast implants, so that they can choose breast implants more carefully. In addition, a better understanding of BII may allow them to think further about whether the benefits of breast implants outweigh the risks.

Infections Associated with Medtronic Duet External Ventricular Drains - Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, January 2023-January 2024.

External ventricular drains (EVDs) are medical devices that are inserted into the ventricles of the brain to drain excess fluid, manage intracranial hypertension, monitor intracranial pressure, and administer medications. Unintentional disconnections and breaks or fractures (breaks) of EVDs or associated drainage system components can result in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and increased risk for EVD-associated infections. After replacement of Integra Life Sciences EVD systems with Medtronic Duet EVD systems at Rhode Island Hospital in mid-September 2023, a threefold increase was observed in the prevalence of positive CSF cultures, from 2.8 per 1,000 days with an EVD in place (EVD days) during January-September 2023 to 11.4 per 1,000 EVD days during October 2023-January 2024 (rate ratio [RR] = 5.7; 95% CI = 1.5-22.0; p = 0.01) and an eightfold increase in the prevalence of infections, from 0.7 to 6.5 per 1,000 EVD days (RR = 9.8; 95% CI = 1.1-87.3; p = 0.04). An investigation by Rhode Island Hospital Infection Control during December 2023-January 2024 identified frequent reports of disconnections and breaks of the Medtronic Duet EVD system. A search of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database identified 326 reports nationwide of disconnection and breaks of components of the Duet EVD system, including 175 during 2023. A Medical Product Safety Network report was filed. The Duet EVD product was ultimately recalled in January 2024, citing disconnections of the EVD system and reports of CSF leakage and infection. Given the widespread use of EVD systems by neurosurgery centers and the risk for EVD-associated infections, a strategy for future consideration by hospital infection prevention and control programs might be inclusion of EVD-associated infections in hospital surveillance programs to rapidly identify increases in these events and determine factors related to such infections to prevent additional infections.

Analysis of Reported Adverse Events Related to Hemospray: An FDA MAUDE Database Study.

Topical hemostatic powder is a mineral powder that forms an adherent barrier and coagulates active bleeding in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Hemospray is the first hemostatic powder approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. Hemospray has been increasingly used to manage GI bleeding. However, data on the adverse events of hemostatic powders are lacking. Therefore, we aim to report and analyze adverse events associated with Hemospray using the FDA's "Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience" database. We analyzed the postmarketing surveillance data from the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database for Hemospray, initially known as TC-325, from June 2018 through April 2022. Results of the search were classified into device-related technical issues, patient-related adverse events and health care staff-related adverse events. Five hundred two medical device reporting claims were identified from June 2018 through April 2022. Seven duplicate claims were identified, and some claims included more than one event type. Therefore, there were 558 device-related problems, 28 patient-related adverse events, and 2 adverse events in health care staff members. The most common device-related problems were activation failure or failure to fire (n = 385, 70.0%) and obstruction of carbon dioxide flow (n = 121, 21.7). The most common patient-related adverse events included tissue injury or bleeding (n = 21) and perforation (n = 5). Although Hemospray is a valuable tool in the armamentarium for endoscopists in managing GI bleeding, endoscopists must be mindful of deice-related problems and potential patient-related adverse events.

Adverse events associated with Vibrant Soundbridge: A MAUDE study

ObjectiveTo summarize adverse events and their root causes reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) hearing device (Med-El, Innsbruck, Austria), an active middle ear implant for patients with moderate to severe hearing loss. Materials and methodsThe FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for reports of VSB adverse events from January 1, 2012, to July 27, 2022. ResultsSix hundred sixty-three total medical device reports were identified, from which 913 adverse events were extracted. Of these, 498 (54.5 %) were adverse events to patients (AEPs), while 415 (45.5 %) were device malfunctions (DMs). The most common AEPs were hearing performance issues 428 (85.9 %). The most common DMs were compromised conductive link 125 (30.1 %). Root causes identified for DMs were iatrogenic 85 (58.6 %), patient-related 28 (19.3 %), and trauma and external causes 32 (22.1 %). The most common iatrogenic root cause 12 (14.1 %) involved damage to the conductive link during revision surgery. The most common patient-related causes of DMs were excessive middle ear tissue growth 16 (57 %), and abrupt body movements 5 (28.6 %). The most common external cause of DM was cleaning of the ear canal or mastoid cavity 20 (62.5 %). ConclusionsDespite its well-known limitations, the MAUDE database provides valuable information on possible complications of VSB as it relates to device malfunction or adverse events for patients. Implementation of standardized reports with relevant and well-defined categories could certainly allow for a more meaningful analysis.

Are adverse events during surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia device related? A review of the MAUDE database.

The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database contains anonymous, voluntary medical device reports. A review of device-related adverse events associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia surgeries was completed. The objective was to evaluate the occurrence and contributing factors to clinically significant complications in a cohort of patients electing to undergo surgical intervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for "Aquablation, Greenlight Laser, Holmium Laser, Morcellator, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Loop Resection, and Prostatic Urethral Lift" from 2018 through 2021. A complication classification system (Level I-IV) based on the Clavien-Dindo system was used to categorize events. These events were then correlated with procedural technology malfunctions and classified as "device related" and "non-device related." Chi squared analysis was performed to identify associations between procedural technology and complication classification distribution. A total of 873 adverse events were identified. The adverse events were classified into level I (minimal harm) versus levels II-IV (clinically significant). Aquablation (p < 0.017) and Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (p < 0.012) were associated with a higher proportion of reports with Level II-IV complications compared with other procedure types. Level II-IV complications were not associated with a reported device related malfunction. Aquablation and water vapor thermal therapy demonstrated noteworthy clinically significant complications which were not driven by device-related malfunctions.

Adverse events associated with anastomotic coupling devices in microvascular reconstruction

ObjectiveIn light of the recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Class 2 safety recall notice for anastomotic coupling devices, it is important to understand related adverse events. The aim of this study was to characterize adverse events in anastomotic coupling devices for microvascular reconstruction. MethodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis using the 2011 to 2021 US FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. All reports of adverse events involving anastomotic coupling devices were retrieved from the MAUDE database. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze categorized events. ResultsThere were a total of 293 documented adverse events related to anastomotic coupling devices. These adverse events resulted in 91 (31.1 %) patient injuries and 239 (81.6 %) device malfunctions. The most frequent patient problems were thrombosis/hematoma (n = 38; 41.8 %), unspecified injury (n = 31; 34.1 %), and failure to anastomose (n = 13; 14.3 %). Free flap necrosis was reported in 42 % of thrombosis/hematoma cases (n = 16). The most common malfunctions were devices operating differently than expected (n = 74; 31.0 %), connection problems (n = 41; 17.2 %), and twisted/bent material (n = 19; 7.9 %). There was no significant trend in the number of adverse events over the study period (p > 0.05). ConclusionsAdverse events from anastomotic coupling devices represent an important and modifiable factor in free tissue failure. Adverse events are predominately related to devices operating differently than expected and may result in vascular compromise of the free flap. Reconstructive surgeons should be cognizant of defective anastomotic coupling devices and be prepared to utilize traditional hand-sewn anastomosis.

Major Complications and Adverse Events Related to Use of SpaceOAR Hydrogel for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and severity of SpaceOARTM-related adverse events using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. MethodsWe analyzed SpaceOAR-related adverse event reports in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from January 2015 to May 2023. For each report, the event type, associated device and patient problems, event description, event timing, and event severity stratified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE) grading system were recorded. ResultsFrom 2015 to 2022, 206,619 SpaceOAR devices were sold. From January 2015 to May 2023, we identified 981 reports describing 990 SpaceOAR-related adverse events. Malfunctions were the most common event type (N=626), followed by patient injuries (N=350) with few reported deaths (N=5). Device positioning problems were the most frequent device issue (N=686). Pain was the most reported patient problem (N=216). Abscesses and fistulas related to the device were each reported in 91 events. A noteworthy portion of relevant adverse events occurred before the initiation of radiation (N=35, 22.4%), suggesting the device, rather than the radiation, was responsible. In total, 470 (50.2%) and 344 (36.7%) of the adverse events were CTCAE grade 1 and 2, respectively. There were 123 (13.1%) events that were CTCAE grade ≥ 3. ConclusionWe identified multiple reports of SpaceOAR-related adverse events, many of which are more serious than have been reported in clinical trials. While SpaceOAR use is common, suggesting these events are rare, these data highlight the need for continued postmarket surveillance.

(215) Penuma® Penile Implant Adverse Events in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database

Abstract Introduction Penuma® is an FDA-approved penile implant intended to increase flaccid penile length and girth for improved cosmesis. It is the only FDA-approved product of its kind, with reportedly thousands of implants since 2004. There is a paucity of data on the adverse events related to this procedure. Objective To describe and characterize adverse events related to Penuma® using a national database. Methods The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, a voluntary-reported database of medical device complications with data since 1991, was queried. The MAUDE adverse event classification system, a validated classification system, was used as a standardized tool to classify adverse events based on severity. All adverse events related to Penuma® were identified and quantified. Results 42 reports of adverse events related to Penuma® were identified (Figure 1). Of these, 35 patients were reported to undergo device removal most commonly due to infection (n=8) or protrusion (n=8). (Table 1). The most commonly reported adverse event was deformity/disfigurement (n=27), of which 18 cases reported loss of penile length. Other adverse events included: pain (n=16), infection (n=12), decreased sensitivity (n=10), scar tissue (n=9), erectile dysfunction (n=8), seroma (n=7), and erosion (n=6). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically characterize publicly reported adverse events occurring with Penuma® implantation, using the MAUDE database. Further research is warranted to delineate the incidence of adverse events related to Penuma®. Disclosure No.

Adverse events of the single-operator cholangioscopy system: a Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database analysis

SpyGlass single operator cholangioscopy (SOC) system is generally considered safe but adds additional risks to those associated with standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We evaluated adverse events (AEs) with the SpyGlass System reported in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database between January 2016 & August 2023. A total of 2331 device problems (SpyGlass DS:1301, SpyGlass DS II:1010) were reported. An optical problem was the most reported issue with 83 for the SpyGlass DS and 457 for the SpyGlass DS II. Patient related events were found in 62 (3.5%) of 1743 reports: 33 with SpyGlass DS, and 29 with SpyGlass DSII. The most common AEs were bleeding/hemorrhage followed by perforation, infection, fever, or sepsis and pancreatitis. Our findings add to the existing literature and provides a fuller picture of potential problems associated with SpyGlass™ SOC.

Modes of failure of guide catheter extensions: Insights from the MAUDE database.

Guide catheter extensions (GCEs) are commonly used to facilitate percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We investigated the incidence and modes of failure of GCEs.. Data from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database between 2012 and 2022 were used to investigate the most common modes of failure and related adverse events with the use of GCEs. We performed analysis of 4 commonly used catheters: GuideLiner (Teleflex), Guidezilla (Boston Scientific), TrapLiner (Teleflex), and Telescope (Medtronic). The first event reported for GuideLiner was in 2012, Guidezilla in 2018, TrapLiner in 2017, and Telescope in 2019. During the study period, a total of 651 events were reported to the database. A total of 429 true GCE device failures were identified: 59 (14%) for GuideLiner, 297 (69%) for Guidezilla, 47 (11%) TrapLiner, and 26 (6%) for Telescope. Catheter detachment or fracture was the most frequently reported device failure for all 4 GCEs; these failures included shaft fractures, tip deformations, and collar detachments. We identified 222 reported events as unspecified adverse events; these events included device-to-device incompatibility, difficulty to advance, and device fractures outside the patient body. Only 58 (8.9%) events resulted in patient complication. Of these, coronary artery dissection was the most frequently reported complication. Device detachment/fracture is the most common mode of device failure in all 4 GCEs, and coronary dissection is the most common patient complication.

Deoxycholic Acid for Submental Convexity: A MAUDE Database Analysis

Study Design The study was a retrospective cross-sectional database analysis. Objective Deoxycholic acid (DOC) injections are a novel, in-office procedural alternative to submental liposuction or submentoplasty to address excess submental fat. Post-market safety data regarding this treatment is currently limited. The objective of this study is to analyze adverse events reported in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. Methods The MAUDE database was queried for all reports related to adverse events involving deoxycholic acid using the search terms “KYBELLA” and “deoxycholic acid.” Reports were individually reviewed by 2 reviewers and categorized with special attention to adverse events. Results A total of 34 medical device reports were identified from the database query. Thirteen of these reports (21 total events) were included in the analysis after excluding duplicates, unrelated adverse events, or events associated with the off-label use of DOC. Reported adverse events include excessive swelling (n = 5, 24%), marginal mandibular nerve weakness (n = 4, 19%), unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome (n = 4, 19%), numbness (n = 3, 14%), dysphagia (n = 1, 5%), infection (n = 1, 5%), and skin necrosis (n = 3, 14%). Two patients required hospitalization for skin necrosis management; both had underlying systemic diseases. Conclusions Adverse events following DOC injections included excessive swelling, dysphagia, numbness, infection, unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome, facial nerve weakness, and skin necrosis requiring hospitalization and/or surgery. Patient counseling regarding these adverse events should be discussed when offering DOC injections for submental convexity.

Cleaning of dental handpieces: Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database analysis and evaluation of in-use testing of manual and automated cleaning processes

BackgroundThis work aimed to provide evidence for the importance of regular cleaning and care of dental handpieces. In addition, this study aimed to show that automated cleaning of dental tools may deliver superior results compared with manual cleaning. MethodsPublicly available data from the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database on incidents in the use of dental handpieces from the past 10 years were evaluated. The cleaning results of more than 4,830 instruments were also investigated and evaluated. ResultsBy evaluating the manufacturer’s information on the incidents reported in the FDA’s MAUDE database, the connection between inadequate or no maintenance and care and the incidents was clearly shown. The evaluation of the results of manual cleaning compared with automated cleaning clearly shows that better results can be achieved through automated cleaning. ConclusionsThe evaluation of the FDA’s MAUDE database confirmed and emphasized the importance of cleaning and care for the safe and long-term use of dental tools. Comparing the data from manual cleaning and the usage of a device for automated cleaning of dental handpieces, it was shown that the establishment of a quality-controlled system for in-use testing of cleaning performance could provide valuable data for assessing the efficacy of different cleaning processes. Valuable feedback for the user can be derived this way. In addition, it was shown that automated cleaning of dental handpieces is a reasonable alternative and leads to clearly better results.

Real-world Experience Of Adverse Events And Modes Of Failure Related To The New Impella 5.5 - A Retrospective Analysis From Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience Database

Real-world Experience Of Adverse Events And Modes Of Failure Related To The New Impella 5.5 - A Retrospective Analysis From Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience Database

A review of adverse events related to synthetic cartilage implant for the first metatarsophalangeal joint: An analysis of Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database from 2016 to 2023

BackgroundThe Cartiva® Synthetic Cartilage Implant has been available in the United States since 2016. Despite promising early results in the treatment of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis, literature reporting higher-than-anticipated rates of adverse events and catastrophic failure soon followed its widespread use. The purpose of this manuscript is to review all adverse events submitted for this device into the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database. MethodsThe Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was retrospectively reviewed between July 2016 and June 2023 for adverse events related to the Cartiva® Synthetic Cartilage Implant. Non-first metatarsophalangeal joint usage, duplicate submissions, and literature review reports were excluded. ResultsA total of 236 unique submissions were identified. The most common Device Problem was an Unspecified Device Issue (N=129, 55%). The most common Patient Problem identified was Pain/Inflammation (N=133, 56%). Implant removal occurred in 73.7% with an additional 9.3% pending removal. Of the 102 revision surgeries, 67.7% were converted to fusion. ConclusionAnalysis of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database submissions demonstrates that the Cartiva® Synthetic Cartilage Implant has continued dysfunction issues yet remains on the market. It represents the unfortunately repetitive rise and fall of new surgical devices accepted too early in the usage life cycle before mid- to -long-term outcomes exist. This raises questions about the utility of this database and about transparency by surgical device companies regarding their reported patient benefit-to-risk ratios. Based on our findings, we propose a restructuring of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database reporting rules. Level of evidenceIV, Case series from large database analysis ClassificationForefoot reconstruction

Real-World Experience With the Angio-Seal Closure Device: Insights From Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Angio-Seal (Terumo Medical Corporations, Somerset, New Jersey) device is indicated for femoral arteriotomy closure. Real-world published data on complications are limited. We present 1 year of safety events involving Angio-Seal from the US Food and Drug Administration's post-market surveillance database of Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). Steps for managing frequent device-related problems are discussed. Angio-Seal MAUDE data from November 2019 to December 2020 was classified according to (1) mode of device failure, (2) complication, (3) treatment, and (4) Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) adverse event classification system. There were 715 safety events, involving Angio-Seal VIP (93.1%), Evolution (5.7%), STS Plus (1.1%), and sizes 6F (62.5%) and 8F (37.5%). Failure mode involved unrecognized use of a damaged device (43.4%), failed deployment (20.1%), failed arterial advancement (6.3%), detachment of device component (4.9%), failed retraction (3.6%), operator error (1.1%), and indeterminate (20.6%). Of total, 44.8% of events were associated with patient harm. Complications involved minor blood loss (34.1%), hematoma (5.6%), significant blood loss (1.4%), and pseudoaneurysm (1.4%). Of total, 43.3% of cases required manual compression (MC), whereas 8.8% required more advanced intervention. Interventions included surgical repair (49.2%), thrombin injection (9.5%), balloon tamponade (6.3%), covered stent (4.8%), and unspecified (30.2%). Majority of safety events were CIRSE grade 1 (92.0%), followed by grades 2 (3.1%), 3 (4.6%), and 6 (deaths, 0.3%). Minority of devices were returned for manufacturer analysis (27.8%). The majority of safety events were associated with minor blood loss or local hematoma and could be addressed with MC alone. Most events were attributed to damaged device; however, very few devices were returned to manufacturer for analysis. This should be encouraged to allow for root cause analysis in order to improve safety profile of devices. System-level strategies for addressing barriers to under-reporting of safety events may also be considered. Our study highlights important safety events encountered in real-world practice with Angio-Seal closure device. The MAUDE database captures real-world device malfunctions not typically appreciated in conventional clinical trials. Our study provides valuable insight for clinician-users on anticipating and managing the most common device malfunctions. Additionally, our data provide feedback for manufactures to optimize product design and direct manufacturer user training to improve safety. Finally, we hope that the study promotes system-level strategies that foster reporting of safety events and undertaking of root cause analysis.

The burning truth about light therapy: a retrospective analysis of the MAUDE database on UV phototherapy and photodynamic therapy complications 2013-2023.

Phototherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) are ultraviolet light (UV) based therapies for patients with skin diseases, and are sometimes associated with potential adverse events (AE)s, including erythema, pain, pruritus, burns, and photoaging. We investigated UV phototherapy and PDT safety using the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)'s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. The MAUDE database, including medical device reports (MDR)s informed by voluntary and obligatory reporters since 1991, was searched for AEs associated with UV phototherapy and PDT 1/1/91-3/1/23. There were 59 UV phototherapy and 33 PDT related MDRs. Burns were the most common AE type for both phototherapy and PDT. The majority of phototherapy AEs occurred during 2021 (52.3%), and were significantly more likely to occur at home than in the clinic. Overall, 76.1% of MDRs associated with home light boxes were prescribed by online retailers, most of the MDRs (59.3%) mentioned that it is prohibited to sell phototherapy devices not prescribed by physicians, and only 8.5% noted poorly written home light box instructions. The COVID-19 pandemic prohibited in-person light treatments, and social distancing requirements may have resulted in increased frequency of home-based light treatments. Hence, while at home treatment may be easier and more accessible, in-office physician supervised UV treatments are associated with less frequent AEs. Moreover, some phototherapy MDRs reported poorly written instructions accompanying the home light box, and some PDT MDRs documented patients receiving inadequate education regarding the procedure. With the rise of at-home treatment options and the ease of obtaining devices on the internet, it is physicians' duty to advise patients against self-treating with home light boxes without prescribed treatment regimens and educate patients that are considering home phototherapy to ensure safer patient experiences.

Analysis of Adverse Event Reports in FDA’s MAUDE Database

Background and Objective: Medical devices (MDs) play a pivotal role in the modern healthcare environment. Adverse events are an expected part of an MD’s lifecycle. To prevent the recurrence of such events, various vigilance systems have been established worldwide. The Manufacturer and User facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a publicly accessible database that contains data of medical device reports (MDRs) submitted to FDA since 1991. The aim of this study is to examine the evolution of MD adverse event reports and analyze several characteristic parameters, as they evolved during the last three decades.&#x0D; Material and Methods: An analysis of MAUDE data was performed to examine the outcomes and device characteristics of adverse event reports from 1991 up to 11/2022. These outcomes included the event type, remedial action, report source, reporter occupation and device evaluation by manufacturer. Specific MD groups were analyzed separately to examine their effect on the event outcomes. Segregated files of the database that contain different types of information on adverse event reports were combined to investigate the various aspects of these reports.&#x0D; Results: Event outcomes are presented as annual histograms. An overall of about 15 million reports have been submitted to MAUDE during the 30 years period examined with more than 2.5 million of them during the first 10 months of the year 2022. This number is growing at an increasing rate. Most of the events (63.5%) have resulted in simple device malfunction, without serious implications to the patient. Depending on the device type however, the health risks may be higher (98.4% injuries from specific dental implants and 3.2% deaths from implantable defibrillators). About 20% of the reports have led to recalls or other corrective actions. Most of the reports (96%) are submitted by manufacturers and over 70% of the devices returned to them are evaluated, following the requirements of FDA 21 CFR, 803. The reporter’s occupation was found to be related to the types of devices associated with the event. Finally, the average device age was found to be 4 years, with an increasing tendency observed over the years, while still most of the events occur during the first year of operation.&#x0D; Conclusion: A medical device adverse event reporting system is a critical component of safety in the use of medical technology in modern healthcare. The information available in MAUDE and its use continues to grow at an accelerated rate and allows critical improvements of MDs, especially in terms of risk prevention, as it gives perception about their safety issues. FDA has taken various steps to encourage and facilitate adverse event reporting and make the data available to the public.

Leadless pacemaker tine damage and fracture: novel complications of a novel device fixation mechanism

BackgroundLeadless pacemakers represent a paradigm-changing advancement. However, they required innovative and novel device design, including the use of nitinol tines for fixation. ObjectiveWe aimed to understand the potential for fracture in the novel tine-based fixation mechanism. MethodsA retrospective approach was used to search the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for events related to Micra pacemaker tine fracture and damage. Review of each report was performed to ascertain frequency of tine fracture and damage. ResultsOf 4241 MAUDE reports (2104 Micra VR, 2167 Micra AV), 230 included the terms “fracture” or “tine”, which yielded 7 tine fractures and 19 reports of tine damage. Overall, 2/7(29%) tine fractures were noted during implant, whereas 2/7(29%) were discovered ≥1 week after implant; 5/7(71%) tine fracture reports described no associated patient signs or symptoms, and 4/7 (57%) described no change in pacing parameters. Tine damage occurred during implant in 16/19 (84%), compared with 2/19 (11%) noted ≥1 week after implant;15/19 (79%) tine damage cases reported no associated signs or symptoms, and 7/19 (37%) described no changes in pacing parameters. Among all cases, there was 1 case of device embolization. ConclusionsThe novel tine-based fixation mechanism appears susceptible to a novel failure mechanism – tine fracture and/or damage. Our analysis suggests these events may not always be associated with adverse signs or symptoms. Diligent attention at implant, and future bench or clinical studies are needed to understand the rate, clinical impact, and mechanism of such failures, and role of surveillance.

Adverse events related to triplanar 1st tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis: 5-year analysis of the united states food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database

BackgroundThe Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system represents an instrumented, jig-guided system to facilitate performing triplanar 1st tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. Literature available for this system is positive, although the vast majority is from inventor/consultant surgeons. The purpose of this manuscript is to review adverse event submissions recorded in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database specific to this system. MethodsThe Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was retrospectively reviewed from inception to 30 June 2023 for adverse events submitted for the Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system. Submissions that involved a medical device product other than this system, duplicate entries, and submissions with data extracted from already published literature were excluded. ResultsA total of 180 unique reports that met inclusion criteria during the 5-year period available were reviewed. The mean time between event occurrence and submission was 46.7-days. The most common entity submitting to the database were the manufacturer company representative or distributor in 66.4%. The most frequently encountered patient problems were pain in 41.9%, non-union in 18.2%, and hardware-related irritation in 11.7%. Reports that detailed a revision surgery described partial/complete hardware removal in 62.7% and revision with additional hardware implantation in 23.3%. ConclusionWhile no direct conclusions regarding the Lapiplasty® 3D Bunion Correction™ system can be drawn from the data as it consists of only adverse event reports, this study demonstrates the need for more non-inventor/consultant literature to further investigate adverse events related this particular system.