Use Of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration Research Articles

MO9-2 Usefulness of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of intraperitoneal tumors other than hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer

In primary or metastatic intraperitoneal tumors(PMIT), there is a limitation of percutaneous biopsy, especially for pancreatic or lymph node metastasis. Therefore, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) is an option for biopsy. Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer by EUS-FNA has been reported to be high sensitivity (89-92%). However, the usefulness of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of other organ tumors has not yet been fully investigated. In this study we investigated the diagnostic ability and safety of EUS-FNA for PMIT other than hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer.

Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Narrative Review.

Considerable progress has been made recently in the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) to diagnose intra-luminal gastrointestinal lesions and extra-luminal lesions near the gastrointestinal tract. Numerous reports have indicated that EUS-FNA has high diagnostic performance and safety, which has led to the routine use of EUS-FNA and an increasing number of cases. Thus, while EUS-FNA has a low rate of complications, endoscopists may encounter these complications as the number of cases increases. Infrequent reports have also described life-threatening complications. Therefore, endoscopists should possess a comprehensive understanding of the complications of EUS-FNA, which include hemorrhage, perforation, infection, and acute pancreatitis, as well as their management. This review examines the available evidence regarding the complications associated with EUS-FNA, and the findings will be useful for ensuring that endoscopists perform EUS-FNA safely and appropriately.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas.

endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe and effective technique in the diagnosis of mediastinal and abdominal masses. However, the usefulness of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas. a retrospective case series was performed in a tertiary referral center. All consecutive patients referred for EUS-FNA with a suspected diagnosis of lymphoma from March 2013 to June 2019 were included. thirty-five patients (54.3 % women, median age 72 years) were included. The most frequent location of the node was the abdomen (67.9 %). Nodes were punctured using a 22-gauge (85.7 %) and 19-gauge needle (14.3 %) with a slow-pull technique. The number of passes performed were three or more in 82.9 % of patients. The samples were processed by the cellblock method. Adequate samples for immunohistochemical and molecular biological study were obtained in 33 (94.3 %) patients. EUS-FNA correctly diagnosed lymphoma in 30 out of 35 patients (85.7 %), and subclassification was determined in 23 patients (65.7 %). The most frequent diagnosis was non-Hodgkin lymphoma (85.7 %). There was one moderate adverse event (bleeding), which was resolved during the procedure. EUS-FNA may be a valuable technique in the evaluation of suspected lymphomas with an adequate diagnostic yield and a very low rate of adverse events.

Role of EUS-FNA for gallbladder mass lesions with biliary obstruction: a large single-center experience.

Background and study aims Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an established modality for pathological sampling of pancreatic and biliary lesions, limited data are available on the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA for evaluation of gallbladder mass lesions, a common cause of obstructive jaundice. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of EUS-FNA for diagnosis of gallbladder mass lesions presenting with biliary obstruction. Patients and methods This study was a retrospective analysis of data from patients who had undergone EUS-FNA for gallbladder mass lesions. FNA was performed on either a gallbladder mass, metastatic node or liver lesions. Outcome measures were diagnostic yield of EUS FNA and adverse events. Results From April 2011 to August 2018, 101 patients with gallbladder mass lesions with biliary obstruction underwent EUS-FNA. The final diagnosis was malignancy in 98, benign disease in one, and two patients were lost to follow-up. EUS-FNA confirmed the diagnosis in 89 of 98 patients with malignancy (sensitivity 90.81 %); was false negative in nine of 98 cases with malignancy; and was truly negative in the solitary patient with benign disease (specificity 100 %). Positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 100 %, 10 %, and 90.90 %, respectively. Two patients had self-limiting pain. Conclusion EUS-FNA is a sensitive tool for evaluation of gallbladder mass lesions presenting with obstructive jaundice. However, because of low NPV, lesions in which FNA is negative should be further evaluated.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for lymphadenopathy.

Lymphadenopathy may be difficult to diagnose using imaging results alone. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may help to diagnose and determine the appropriate management of lymphadenopathy. EUS-FNA has been used as a safe and less invasive method for obtaining pathologic specimens from extraluminal lesions using endoscopic ultrasound. The present study evaluated the usefulness of EUS-FNA for lymphadenopathy. Between July 2013 and December 2016, 72 patients undergoing EUS-FNA for lymphadenopathy that could not be diagnosed solely using imaging were included. The present study evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, overall accuracy, helpfulness in determining the management of lymphadenopathy and EUS-FNA-associated complications. Of the 72 included patients, 8 were diagnosed with benign (inflammatory or reactive) lymphadenopathy. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 95.3, 100, 100, 72.7 and 95.8%, respectively. While EUS-FNA of metastatic nodes identified the origin in the majority of cases, the procedure resulted in a different histopathological diagnosis from the previous image-based diagnosis in 9 patients. Consequently, 2 patients with testicular cancer were administered bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. An individual with GIST was administered imatinib, and a patient with prostate cancer was administered degarelix (antihormon drug). A total of 5 other patients received palliative medicine due to the change in diagnosis. EUS-FNA also helped determine the appropriate cancer management plan in other patients; specifically, based on the cytology of the metastatic lymph node, EUS-FNA helped determine the cancer stage, and to identify recurrence or the primary cancer from which tissue could not be collected. No EUS-FNA-associated symptoms were reported. To conclude, the present study suggested that EUS-FNA of suspected metastatic lymph nodes appears safe and useful for cancer staging and diagnosing recurrence. It may also useful for diagnosing patients whose collection of samples from the original cancer appeared impractical. EUS-FNA for lymphadenopathy that may not be diagnosed with imaging alone may assist in diagnosis and help to determine the appropriate management strategy.

MTE 08.02 Clinical Aspects of EUS(B)-FNA

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been used for lung cancer staging and diagnosis since ‘90s. However, the usefulness of EUS-FNA has not been addressed in the lung cancer field due to the limited accessibility to mediastinal lymph nodes and the low availability of the technique by thoracic physicians. The development of endobronchial ultrasound guided-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) changed the staging process of lung cancer markedly. EBUS-TBNA, which can target mediastinal nodal stations accessible by cervical mediastinoscopy, has replaced standard cervical mediastinoscopy.

Recurrence of renal cell carcinoma diagnosed using contralateral adrenal biopsy with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

A 76-year-old female in whom a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) lesion was resected 19 years previously presented to our hospital with cognitive dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography revealed nodules in the brain, lung, adrenal gland and a pelvic osteolytic lesion. To identify the primary cancer site, the present study performed endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of the left adrenal lesion. Consequently, the pathological findings of the tissue obtained by EUS-FNA were similar to those of the previous nephrectomy specimen, revealing that the adrenal lesion was the recurrence of RCC. The majority of the metastatic lesions in the patient were reduced in size by the multiple kinase inhibitor, pazopanib. Contralateral adrenal metastasis of RCC is rare and the use of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of adrenal lesions remains to be elucidated. This is a rare case of adrenal lesion, diagnosed by EUS-FNA. Therefore, EUS-FNA is considered to be a useful diagnostic modality of adrenal metastases from unidentified primary tumor types.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of kidney lesions: A review.

Traditionally, treatment of renal lesions is indicated based only on imaging features. Although controversy exists about tissue sampling from small renal masses, renal biopsy is indicated in some cases. In this review, we discuss the rationale for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and summarize the recent advances in this field, providing recommendations for the practicing clinician. The use of EUS-FNA appears to be a safe and feasible means of confirming or excluding malignancy. EUS allows assessment and biopsy of masses or lesions within both kidneys and related complications are rare. The main advantages of EUS-FNA are that it can be done as an outpatient procedure, with good results, minimal morbidity and a short hospital stay. Nevertheless, EUS-FNA of renal masses should be indicated only in selected cases, in which there is potential to decrease unnecessary treatment of small renal masses and to best select tumors for active surveillance and minimally invasive ablative therapies. Additionally, some renal lesions may be ineligible for EUS-guided biopsy because of anatomical limitations. EUS-FNA renal biopsy will probably be best applied to central anterior renal masses, while tumors on the posterior aspect of the kidney, percutaneous access will probably be superior.

Evaluation of Therapeutic Uses of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series

Introduction: Despite the safety and high diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for evaluation of gastrointestinal diseases in adults, literature discussing the therapeutic use of EUS-FNA in the pediatric population remains limited. This study reports the experience of a tertiary care referral center along the U.S.-Mexico border on the use of EUS in pediatric patients with pancreaticobiliary disorders. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate safety, clinical utility, and impact of therapeutic EUS on the management of pancreaticobiliary disorders in pediatric patients (less than 18 years) at a tertiary referral center with a predominantly Hispanic population. Data was collected from January 1, 2011 to April 30, 2014. Patients’ demographic, clinical characteristics, medical records, and endoscopic ultrasound procedures data were reviewed. Continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation while categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Results: A total of 6 therapeutic EUS procedures were performed in 5 children (3 females, 2 males). The mean age was 13 years (range 6-17 years) with a mean body mass index of 28.2 (range 18.5-38.8). All procedures were done by an adult gastroenterologist trained in advanced endoscopy. The indications for EUS procedures were abdominal pain with chronic pancreatitis (3) and management of symptomatic pancreaticobiliary cysts/pseudocysts seen on previous imaging (3). All procedures were done under general anesthesia. Six therapeutic procedures performed included celiac plexus block (3), cyst gastrostomy with stents placement (2), and cyst aspiration using EUS-FNA (1). Celiac plexus block effectively provided relief of the abdominal pain in the 2 patients with chronic pancreatitis. Cyst gastrostomy successfully resulted in pseudocyst resolution in the follow-up imaging of 2 patients (up to 6 months after the procedure). Cyst aspiration with EUS-guided FNA resulted in cyst resolution and confirmation of the benign nature of the cyst in 1 patient. All procedures were completed successfully without any reported complications. Conclusion: The therapeutic use of endoscopic ultrasound in the pediatric population is safe and it is associated with a high success rate.Table 1

Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: How many passes?

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has evolved to become an indispensable tool for tissue acquisition in patients with luminal and extra luminal gastrointestinal cancers. Despite the extensive use of EUS-FNA, there still exists a wide variation in the number of samples required to ensure acquisition of diagnostic material from different kind of lesions. There are several factors that may influence the number of fine needle passes made during EUS-FNA, but the main factor seems to be the presence of a Cytopathologist during the EUS procedure. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) in most studies exceeds 90%. Nevertheless, ROSE is not available in many centers. Various studies have investigated the adequate number of needle passes that should be performed if ROSE is not used. Differences exist based on the nature of the target lesion: Five to seven passes for pancreatic masses, three passes for lymphnodes, only one pass for pancreatic cystic lesions. Consider using a core biopsy needle or a 19-G FNA needle for histology could improve the diagnostic yield. Even though EUS-FNA is widely available, some patients still do not receive conclusive diagnoses upon initial EUS-FNA. One way to maximize the benefits for patients might be to centralize cases to several well-equipped, high-volume centers with experienced endosonographers that have universal availability of ROSE.

Influence of the safety and diagnostic accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for resectable pancreatic cancer on clinical performance

To evaluate the safety and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients. Of 213 patients with pancreatic cancer evaluated between April 2007 and August 2011, 82 were thought to have resectable pancreatic cancer on the basis of cross-sectional imaging findings. Of these, 54 underwent EUS-FNA before surgery (FNA+ group) and 28 underwent surgery without preoperative EUS-FNA (FNA- group). All 54 lesions were visible on EUS, and all 54 attempts at FNA were technically successful. The diagnostic accuracy according to cytology and histology findings was 98.1% (53/54) and 77.8% (42/54), respectively, and the total accuracy was 98.1% (53/54). One patient developed mild pancreatitis after EUS-FNA but was successfully treated by conservative therapy. No severe complications occurred after EUS-FNA. In the FNA+ and FNA- groups, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 742 and 265 d, respectively (P = 0.0099), and the median overall survival (OS) was 1042 and 557 d, respectively (P = 0.0071). RFS and OS were therefore not inferior in the FNA+ group. These data indicate that the use of EUS-FNA did not influence RFS or OS, nor did it increase the risk of peritoneal recurrence. In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, preoperative EUS-FNA is a safe and accurate diagnostic method.

EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy for examination of rectal and perirectal lesions

Objective. Few studies have assessed the diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and/or trucut biopsy (TCB) in patients with rectal and perirectal lesions. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of EUS-FNA and/or TCB in patients with rectal and perirectal lesions. We also assessed their influence on the management and clinical course of these patients. Material and methods. We performed EUS-FNA and/or TCB in 11 consecutive patients (4 men and 7 women, 33–69 years) with rectal and perirectal lesions for whom conventional diagnostic tools could not provide definitive diagnoses. Patients with definite intraluminal cancer were excluded. Results. The 11 patients underwent 12 procedures, with 9 being EUS-FNA alone and 3 being EUS-FNA and TCB. Seven patients had rectal lesions and four had perirectal lesions. Initial EUS-FNA and/or TCB established a diagnosis of malignancy in five patients and of benign lesions in four. EUS-FNA plus TCB confirmed malignant lymphoma after diagnostic failure of initial EUS-FNA in one patient. In one other patient with suspicious secondary linitis plastica, EUS-FNA could not establish a definitive diagnosis. Correct diagnoses were obtained in 10 out of 11 patients who underwent EUS-FNA and/or TCB. EUS-FNA and/or TCB changed clinical courses, which included avoidance of unnecessary surgeries, having a chance of anal sphincter-saving surgeries, and timely administration of chemotherapy. No serious complications related to the use of EUS-FNA or TCB were evident. Conclusion. EUS-FNA and/or TCB are useful in the diagnostic evaluation of and appropriate therapeutic plan in patients with rectal and perirectal lesions.

Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of intrathoracic and intra‐abdominal spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions

The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions is unclear. This study reviews the use of EUS-FNA in diagnosing intrathoracic and intra-abdominal spindle and mesenchymal cell lesions at an academic institution. All EUS-FNA specimens with a significant spindle or mesenchymal cell component were retrieved. Follow-up was comprised of clinical correlation, chart review, or evaluation of subsequent tissue specimens, including FNAs, biopsies, and/or surgical resections. Lesions were categorized as either inflammatory/reactive or neoplastic. Forty-four EUS-FNA specimens were retrieved from 39 patients (21 men and 18 women with a median age of 61 years [range, 20-88 years]). Anatomic sites included 19 lymph node specimens, 15 gastrointestinal tract specimens, 7 pancreatic specimens, and 4 other anatomic site specimens. Twenty-two cases were inflammatory/reactive lesions, including 17 granulomatous lesions and 5 cases of chronic pancreatitis. Twenty-two cases were neoplastic, including 14 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 2 smooth muscle tumors, 2 sarcomatoid carcinomas, 2 melanomas, 1 sarcoma, and 1 solitary fibrous tumor. A specific cytologic diagnosis was rendered in 30 cases (81%). Immunocytochemistry was performed on 21 neoplastic cases and contributed to the differential diagnosis in 18 cases. No false-positive findings were encountered. Three false-negative results were identified and were attributed to sampling error. Spindle cell neoplasms are rarely encountered on EUS-FNA. The differential diagnosis encompasses a wide variety of benign and neoplastic entities. Correlation of cytomorphology and ancillary studies yields a high diagnostic accuracy of spindle cell and mesenchymal lesions on EUS-FNA.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach: How to manage?

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is one of the most common malignant mesenchymal tumors of the stomach. Prognosis of this disease is related to tumor size and mitotic activity and early diagnosis is the only way to improve it. Diagnosis of GIST always requires histological and immunohistochemical confirmation as no imaging modalities can diagnose it conclusively. Endoscopic forceps biopsy results are frequently negative. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a technique which allows tissue samples to be obtained with minimal risks and is accurate in the diagnosis of GIST. From the point of view of the endoscopist, aggressive use of EUS-FNA is the only promising way to allow early diagnosis and early treatment of this disease.

Effectiveness of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy of mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Background: Recently endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or Trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) has been reported a promising diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with safe and accurate tissue sampling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of EUS-FNA and EUS-TCB in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy.

Usefulness of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Mediastinal Lesions

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a safe and effective technique for the diagnosis of focal pancreatic lesions and enlarged abdominal lymph nodes. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive cases in which EUS-FNA was used for the diagnosis of a mediastinal lesion between January 2001 and September 2003. We used a radial echoendoscope to assess the characteristics of the lesion and a linear-array echoendoscope to perform transesophageal needle aspiration with a 22-gauge needle. Histopathology of the resected specimen was considered as the gold standard in surgically treated patients whereas cytology obtained by EUS-FNA was the gold standard when surgery was not indicated. EUS-FNA was performed in 59 patients with a total of 89 lesions with mean (SD) dimensions of 2.4 (2.0) cm x 1.6 (1.4) cm. Malignant lesions were larger than benign ones (short axis, 2.7 [1.4] as compared with 1.0 [0.9] cm; P< .001). The diagnosis was obtained for 53 patients (90%) and 81 lesions (91%) with a mean of 2 (1) passes per lesion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA were 81%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 88%, respectively, when analyzed by lesion, and 88%, 100%, 100%, 80%, and 92% when analyzed by patient. EUS-FNA is an effective technique for the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions. The likelihood of malignancy increases with size.

Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of neoplasms of the head and neck.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive and highly accurate method of detecting mediastinal lymph-node metastases in gastrointestinal and lung cancer. Little information is available regarding the use of EUS-FNA to stage tumors in the head and neck region. This study reports experience with EUS in the diagnosis and staging of these tumors and their mediastinal spread. The records of patients who underwent EUS for diagnosis and/or staging of head and neck tumors were reviewed. Referral criteria were suspected invasion of the esophagus by a lower-neck mass on cervical computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or mediastinal lymphadenopathy > 10 mm on a chest CT. Thirty-two patients (23 men, nine women; mean age 65 years, range 44 - 80) were referred and underwent 35 EUS examinations. In one patient, EUS was not possible due to a benign esophageal stricture. In 17 patients with suspected esophageal invasion on CT scans, EUS demonstrated invasion of the esophagus in four cases and of the pleura in one; 12 tumors showed no visible invasion of adjacent structures. The other 17 examinations were carried out for suspected mediastinal metastatic disease. In eight cases, EUS-FNA confirmed metastatic disease, whereas only benign changes were shown in the other nine cases. EUS-FNA also provided the first tissue diagnosis in two primary tumors and identified malignancy in one patient with no CT suspicion of positive mediastinal lymph nodes. EUS avoided the need for more invasive investigations in all patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and it changed the management in 12 of the 17 patients (71 %) with suspected esophageal invasion and in eight of the 17 patients (47 %) with suspected mediastinal disease. EUS with FNA provides a viable approach to the diagnosis and staging of tumors in the head and neck region when there is a suggestion of esophageal invasion on CT or MRI, or enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. EUS with FNA may avoid the need for mediastinoscopy or other more invasive techniques for staging of these neoplasms.