Use Of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Research Articles

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from evidence to clinical practice

Mortality for cardiogenic shock is still high despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Therefore, active mechanical circulatory support devices are increasingly used; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) enables full circulatory and respiratory support. However, recent data show that in patients with infarct-related shock unselected early use of VA-ECMO does not improve survival and is associated with major bleeding and peripheral ischemic complications. Nowadays, waiting for the results of definitive randomized controlled trials, the main indication for ECMO utilization is in selected patients with cardiac arrest, in those with shock for advanced heart failure refractory to conventional therapy, in those with fulminant myocarditis, in patients candidate for heart transplant or ventricular assistance, especially in presence of respiratory insufficiency and severe biventricular dysfunction. An important recommendation is its utilization in specialized, high-volume centers in the setting of hub and spoke hospitals.

Scrutinizing the Role of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Has Clinical Practice Outpaced the Evidence?

The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for temporary mechanical circulatory support in various clinical scenarios has been increasing consistently, despite the lack of sufficient evidence regarding its benefit and safety from adequately powered randomized controlled trials. Although the ARREST trial (Advanced Reperfusion Strategies for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation) and a secondary analysis of the PRAGUE OHCA trial (Prague Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) provided some evidence in favor of VA-ECMO in the setting of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the INCEPTION trial (Early Initiation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) has not found a relevant improvement of short-term mortality with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In addition, the results of the recently published ECLS-SHOCK trial (Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock) and ECMO-CS trial (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock) discourage the routine use of VA-ECMO in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Ongoing clinical trials (ANCHOR [Assessment of ECMO in Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock, NCT04184635], REVERSE [Impella CP With VA ECMO for Cardiogenic Shock, NCT03431467], UNLOAD ECMO [Left Ventricular Unloading to Improve Outcome in Cardiogenic Shock Patients on VA-ECMO, NCT05577195], PIONEER [Hemodynamic Support With ECMO and IABP in Elective Complex High-risk PCI, NCT04045873]) may clarify the usefulness of VA-ECMO in specific patient subpopulations and the efficacy of combined mechanical circulatory support strategies. Pending further data to refine patient selection and management recommendations for VA-ECMO, it remains uncertain whether the present usage of this device improves outcomes.

The Risk of Pretransplant Blood Transfusion for Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplant

BackgroundPrimary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of short- and long-term mortality associated with lung transplantation. The impact of pretransplantation blood transfusions for recipients is not fully elucidated. MethodsThis is a retrospective review of 206 consecutive lung transplantations performed at a single academic center (Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL) from January 2018 to July 2022. Data on patient characteristics, pretransplantation laboratory values, transfusion requirements, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected. ResultsPGD grade 3 (PGD 3) occurred in 13.2% of the cohort (n = 28). A total of 33 patients received a blood transfusion within 4 weeks, whereas 21 patients received a blood transfusion a week before their lung transplant. Pretransplantation transfusions were strongly associated with a higher incidence of PGD 3 (48.5% vs 6.9%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in 1-year survival between the pretransplantation transfused group and the nontransfused group (77.7% vs 88.0%; P = .478). The 1year survival was reduced in recipients with PGD 3 compared with recipients without PGD 3 (63.5% vs 89.9%; P = .0012). In univariate analysis, pretransplant and intratransplant predictors of PGD 3 included younger age (P < .01), pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use (P < .001), higher lung allocation score (P < .001), coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related acute respiratory distress syndrome (P < .01), blood transfusion within 4 weeks (P < .001), longer operative time (P < .001), intratransplant blood transfusion (P < .001), and intratransplant venoarterial ECMO use (P < .001). ConclusionsPretransplantation blood transfusions could be associated with a higher rate of PGD. The findings indicated the potential risks of pretransplantation blood transfusions in lung transplant recipients.

Current Use and Impact of Pulmonary Artery Catheters on the Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With an Impella: Findings From the Japan Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD).

This study aimed to investigate the current use and impact of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) who underwent Impella support. This was a prospective multicenter observational study between January 2020 and December 2021 that registered all patients with drug-refractory acute heart failure and in whom the placement of an Impella 2.5, CP, or 5.0 pump was attempted or successful in Japan. Cardiac ICUs in Japan. Between January 2020 and December 2021, a total of 3112 patients treated with an Impella were prospectively enrolled in the Japan registry for percutaneous ventricular assist device (J-PVAD). Among them, 2063 patients with CS were divided into two groups according to the PAC use. None. The primary endpoint was the 30-day mortality, and the secondary endpoints were hemolysis, acute kidney injury, sepsis, major bleeding unrelated to the Impella, and ventricular arrhythmias within 30 days. PACs were used in 1358 patients (65.8%) who underwent an Impella implantation. The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was significantly higher in the patients with PACs than in those without. Factors associated with PAC use were the prevalence of hypertension, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, New York Heart Association classification IV, the lesser prevalence of a heart rate less than 50, and the use of any catecholamine. The primary and secondary endpoints did not significantly differ according to the PAC use. Focusing on the patients with VA-ECMO use, the 30-day mortality and hemolysis were univariately lower in the patients with PACs. The J-PVAD findings indicated that PAC use did not have a significant impact on the short-term outcomes in CS patients undergoing Impella support. Further prospective studies are required to explore the clinical implications of PAC-guided intensive treatment strategies in these patients.

The impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock post-acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cardiogenic shock remains the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used in the treatment of infarct-related cardiogenic shock. However, there is limited evidence regarding its beneficial impact on mortality. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies reporting the impact of VA-ECMO on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. A comprehensive search of medical databases (Cochrane Register and PubMed) was conducted. Studies that reported mortality outcomes in patients treated with VA-ECMO for infarct-related cardiogenic shock were included. The database search yielded 1194 results, of which 11 studies were included in the systematic review. Four of these studies, with a total of 586 patients, were randomized controlled trials and were included in the meta-analysis. This demonstrated that there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality with the use of VA-ECMO compared with standard medical therapy [odds ratio (OR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.27]. Meta-analysis of two studies showed that VA-ECMO was associated with a significant reduction in 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.86). Qualitative synthesis of the observational studies showed that age, serum creatinine, serum lactate, and successful revascularization are independent predictors of mortality. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation does not improve 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction; however, there may be significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 12 months. Further studies are needed to delineate the potential benefit of VA-ECMO in long-term outcomes. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023461740).

Muscle ultrasound shear wave elastography for detection of early onset lower limb ischemia in patients with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Background and objectivesLimb ischemia or compartment syndrome, requiring surgery, are some of the frequent cannula-related complications in patients supported with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The purpose of this exploratory study is to depict and evaluate the dynamic changes in the lower limb muscles with ultrasound shear wave elastography as marker for early lower limb ischemia.MethodsEleven patients with VA-ECMO after cardiac arrest were included in this study. Seven patients received distal perfusion cannula (DPC) after implantation of the VA-ECMO, whereas 4 had no DPC after VA-ECMO. Compartment syndrome was clinically excluded in all patients. Both lower limbs, e.g., with and without arterial cannula, were monitored with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for the oxygen saturation of the local tissue. We performed ultrasound shear wave elastrography (SWE) to assess dynamic changes of the medial gastrocnemius muscle at maximum passive muscle stretch (exercise) of both legs. Color-coded duplexsonography was conducted to examine the blood flow velocity of the popliteal artery of the lower limb.ResultsWe found no difference between DPC and no DPC (p = 0.115) during use of VA-ECMO. However, we detected marked lower limb muscle perfusion deficits of cannulated (58.9 ± 13.5 kPa) vs. cannula-free limb (95.7 ± 27.9 kPa: p < 0.001), applying SWE. No relationship was detected between NIRS measurements and SWE values (kPa) of both lower limbs. The mean peak systolic velocity of the popliteal artery at the cannulated side (30.0 ± 11.7 cm/s) was reduced compared to the non-cannulated side (39.3 ± 18.6 cm/s; p = 0.054).ConclusionsRegardless of DPC after implantation of VA-ECMO, the gastrocnemius muscles seem to lose function due to cannula-related microcirculatory deficits. Muscle function analysis via SWE combined with NIRS might offer a sensitive indicator for early onset leg ischemia during VA-ECMO-related arterial cannulation.

Changing Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From a Nationwide Registry inJapan.

Temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock after the revision of guideline recommendations for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use and the approval of the Impella require further investigation, because their impact remains uncertain. Using the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (J-PCI) registry database from 2019 to 2021, we identified 12 171 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock under mechanical circulatory support. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: (1) IABP alone, (2) Impella, and (3) venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO); the VA-ECMO group was further stratified into (3a) VA-ECMO alone, (3b) VA-ECMO in combination with IABP, and (3c) VA-ECMO in combination with Impella. The quarterly prevalence and outcomes were reported. The use of IABP alone decreased significantly from 63.5% in the first quarter of 2019 to 58.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021 (P for trend=0.01). Among 4245 patients requiring VA-ECMO, the use of VA-ECMO in combination with IABP decreased significantly from 78.7% to 67.3%, whereas the use of VA-ECMO in combination with Impella increased significantly from 4.2% to 17.0% (P for trend <0.001 for both). After adjusting for the confounders, the risk difference in the fourth quarter of 2021 relative to the first quarter of 2019 for in-hospital mortality was not significant (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]). Our study revealed substantial changes in the use of different mechanical circulatory support modalities in acute coronary syndrome complicated with cardiogenic shock, but they did not significantly improve the outcomes.

Outcomes of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With Percutaneous Left Ventricular Unloading in Fulminant Myocarditis.

Fulminant myocarditis requiring peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has a high mortality rate. We investigated clinical outcomes of combined use of VA-ECMO and percutaneous left ventricular assist device (VAD) (Impella) for fulminant myocarditis in 104 consecutive patients enrolled in the Japan Registry for Percutaneous VAD (J-pVAD) between October 2017 and January 2020. Patients were followed until hospital discharge and predictors of survival were analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. The median support duration of combined use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECMO/Impella) was 6 days, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 15% to 52% during support ( p < 0.0001). Overall, 66 patients (63%) survived to discharge. Multivariate analysis revealed ECMO/Impella support at a transplant center as an independent predictor of survival ( p = 0.0231). Patients treated at transplant centers had better 60 days survival rates when compared to nontransplant centers (83% vs. 55%, p = 0.005). However, baseline characteristics and treatment strategies differed between the two groups. This real-world national registry database suggested the difference in survival after ECMO/Impella support for fulminant myocarditis between transplant and nontransplant centers, which may indicate hospital variations regarding patient management, although further controlled studies are needed.

Impact of age and body mass index (BMI) on the short-term prognosis of Impella in patients with cardiogenic shock

Abstract Introduction The percutaneous transcatheter left ventricular assist device, Impella, has been recently introduced in Japan for patients with drug refractory acute heart failure including cardiogenic shock (CGS). Despite its potential benefits, Impella is associated with certain limitations, including a large device size and an increased risk of complications such as bleeding, hemolysis, and renal failure. These factors may present challenges for the use of Impella in elderly patients and those with smaller body size. For elderly patients with various comorbidities, the clinical impact of invasive hemodynamic support with impella remains unclear. Objective To assess the impact of age and body mass index (BMI) on the survival of patients with CGS treated with Impella. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 133 consecutive patients, who received Impella for cardiogenic shock, including cardiac arrest, between September 2018 and January 2023 at our institute. Patients were divided into two distinct age groups: younger group (&amp;lt;75 years of age; n=59) and elderly group (≥75 years; n=74). We assessed rate of successful Impella weaning and the 30-day survival. Multivariate cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality. Results Baseline patient characteristics demonstrated a mean age of 70 ±13 years with 71% male ratio. Acute coronary syndrome was diagnosed in 72% of patients, while 63% received concomitant venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), called ECPELLA, and 41% underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR). The elderly group exhibited a lower BMI and higher rates of comorbidities, such as hypertension and chronic kidney disease. Notably, the incidence of cardiac arrest, E-CPR, and concomitant use of VA-ECMO were significantly lower in the elderly group compared with the younger group. There were no significant differences in Impella weaning, support duration, and length of hospital stay among two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the 30-day survival was also similar between two groups. Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that BMI was significantly associated with 30-day mortality along with E-CPR and the combined use of VA-ECMO. Multivariable Cox regression analysis including the age, male, BMI, E-CPR, and combined use of VA-ECMO showed that the predictive values of independent determinants for 30-day mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.07, P&amp;lt;0.0001), BMI (HR 1.14, 95%CI, 1.06-1.21, P=0.0001), and VA-ECMO (HR 4.27, 95% CI, 1.92-9.50, P=0.0004). Conclusion Results suggest that age and BMI were significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality risk, indicating a counterintuitive relationship between BMI and mortality in this population.OutcomesMultivariate Cox Regression

Outcomes of ECLS-SHOCK Eligibility Criteria Applied to a Real-World Cohort.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) exhibits high (~50%) in-hospital mortality. The recently published Extracorporeal life Support in Cardiogenic Shock (ECLS-SHOCK) trial demonstrated the neutral effects of the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) on all-cause death, as well as on all secondary outcomes in subjects presenting with myocardial-infarction (MI)-related CS. Here, we compared ECLS-SHOCK eligibility criteria with a real-world cohort of CS patients. ECLS-SHOCK eligibility criteria were applied to a prospective single-center CS registry (the PREPARE CS registry) consisting of 557 patients who were consecutively admitted to the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, due to CS (SCAI C-E). Overall use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in this cohort was 19%. Sixty-nine percent of the entire cohort had MI-related CS, 38% of whom would have met ECLS-SHOCK eligibility criteria, thus representing only 27% of the PREPARE CS registry. Exclusion from the ECLS-SHOCK trial was based on patients with initial lactate values below 3 mmol/L (n = 168; 43.6%), aged over 80 years (n = 65; 16.9%), and with a duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) exceeding 45 min (n = 22; 5.7%). The 30-day mortality of patients of the PREPARE CS registry who met the ECLS-SHOCK eligibility criteria was 57.0%, compared to 48.4% of patients in the ECLS-SHOCK trial. The patients' baseline characteristics, however, differed considerably with respect to type of infarction, age, and gender. In a real-world cohort of patients with MI-related CS, only 38% of patients met the eligibility criteria of the ECLS-SHOCK trial. Thus, the impact of the use of VA-ECMO on outcome parameters in MI-related CS, as observed in the ECLS-SHOCK trial, may differ in a more heterogeneous real-world CS population of the PREPARE CS registry.

Abstract 381: Simultaneous Use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA) Improves Mid-Term Mortality in Patients With Refractory Cardiac Arrest or Cardiac Shock Who Required VA-ECMO

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is an effective therapy to rescue patients with refractory cardiogenic shock, including cardiac arrest. VA-ECMO increase damaged left ventricular (LV) afterload. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has been often used as the additional circulatory support for LV unloading. However, the effectiveness of combining VA-ECMO with IABP has not been definitively established. The Impella , a percutaneous micro-axial pump, can reduce damaged LV preload with circulatory support, which may have significant effect on clinical outcome by concomitant use of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA). Objective: This single-site cohort study aimed to assess the impact of ECPELLA compared to VA-ECMO with or without IABP in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 275 consecutive patients who received VA-ECMO from January 2012 through December 2022 in our institute. The patients were divided into two groups, ECEPLLA (n = 81) and VA-ECMO with or without IABP (n = 194). The primary outcome of this study was the 180-day all-cause mortality rate. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender ratio, prevalence of coronary risk factors, serum lactate levels at the emergency room (ER), the rate of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR), and instances of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between the groups. The ECPELLA groups had a significantly higher rate of acute coronary syndrome and a lower prevalence of chronic kidney disease. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 180-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ECPELLA group compared to the VA-ECMO group (p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27 [10 years increase]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.42, p &lt; 0.001), E-CPR (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.00, p = 0.04), lactate level at ER (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10, p &lt; 0.001), and ECPELLA (HR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.40-0.76, p &lt; 0.001) were significantly associated with the 180-day all-cause mortality. Conclusion: ECPELLA was associated with improvement of mid-term mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock who received VA-ECMO.

Effectiveness of VA-ECMO plus intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiac shock in patients with type A aortic dissection: a case series

Limited reports exist on the utilization of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) following aortic dissection surgery, possibly due to concerns regarding complications. This case series aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using VA-ECMO in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for managing postoperative cardiogenic shock in patients with type A aortic dissection (AAD). The study included nine patients with an average age of 57.0 ± 9.5 years. The patients underwent various surgical procedures, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and aortic root reconstruction. The results showed that the combined use of VA-ECMO and IABP was feasible and effective in managing postoperative cardiogenic shock in AAD patients. However, the in-hospital mortality rate was high, with six out of nine patients succumbing to the condition. Among the patients who received VA-ECMO plus IABP in the operating room, four were successfully weaned from VA-ECMO, and three survived with a mean follow-up of 20 months. The study also highlighted the potential risks of renal complications associated with VA-ECMO and IABP. The findings suggest that the combined therapy of VA-ECMO and IABP may be beneficial for patients who have difficulty weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) after AAD surgery.

Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella Versus IABP in Patients With VA-ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) use for circulatory support in cardiogenic shock results in increased left ventricular (LV) afterload. The use of concomitant Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) have been proposed as adjunct devices for LV unloading. The authors sought to compare head-to-head efficacy and safety outcomes between the 2 LV unloading strategies. We conducted a search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies comparing the use of Impella to IABP in patients on VA-ECMO. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included transition to durable LV assist devices/cardiac transplantation, stroke, limb ischemia, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, major bleeding, and hemolysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence interval and heterogeneity statistic I2 were calculated using a random-effects model. A total of 7 observational studies with 698 patients were included. Patients on VA-ECMO unloaded with Impella vs IABP had similar risk of short-term all-cause mortality, defined as either 30-day or in-hospital mortality- 60.8% vs 64.9% (RR 0.93 [0.71 to 1.21], I2=71%). No significant difference was observed in transition to durable LV assist devices/cardiac transplantation, continuous renal replacement therapy initiation, stroke, or limb ischemia between the 2 strategies. However, the use of VA-ECMO with Impella was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (57.2% vs 39.7%) (RR 1.66 [1.12 to 2.44], I2=82%) and hemolysis (31% vs 7%) (RR 4.61 [1.24 to 17.17], I2=66%) compared with VA-ECMO, along with IABP. In conclusion, in patients requiring VA-ECMO for circulatory support, the concomitant use of Impella or IABP had comparable short-term mortality. However, Impella use was associated with increased risk of major bleeding and hemolysis.

Utilization of Shock Team and Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in Northern Ontario

BackgroundDespite advancements in critical care and coronary revascularization, cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes remain poor. Implementing a shock team and use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have been associated with improved CS outcomes, but its feasibility in remote and rural areas remains unknown. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with CS who required mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at Health Sciences North, Sudbury, Ontario. The analysis aimed to accomplish 2 objectives: first, to review the outcomes associated with use of Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) and, second, to assess the feasibility of establishing a shock team to facilitate the local implementation of VA-ECMO. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. ResultsThe outcomes of 15 patients with CS who received Impella between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed. Their average age was 65 years (standard deviation [SD]: 13), and 8 patients (53%) were female. CS was ischemic in 12 patients (80%). Transfemoral Impella CP (cardiac power) was the most frequently used (93%). Thirteen patients (87%) died during the index hospital stay post-Impella because of progressive circulatory failure. The shock team was established following consultations with several Canadian MCS centres, leading to the development of a protocol to guide use of MCS. There have been 4 cases in which percutaneous VA-ECMO using Cardiohelp (Getinge/Maquet, Wayne, NJ) has been used; 3 (75%) survived beyond the index hospitalization. ConclusionsThis analysis demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a shock team in remote Northern Ontario, enabling the use of VA-ECMO with success in a centre with a sizeable rural catchment area. This initiative helps address the gap in cardiac care outcomes between rural and urban areas in Ontario.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock despite the lack of evidence from adequately powered randomised clinical trials. Three trials reported so far were underpowered to detect a survival benefit; we therefore conducted an individual patient-based meta-analysis to assess the effect of VA-ECMO on 30-day death rate. Randomised clinical trials comparing early routine use of VA-ECMO versus optimal medical therapy alone in patients presenting with infarct-related cardiogenic shock were identified by searching MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and trial registries until June 12, 2023. Trials were included if at least all-cause death rate 30 days after in-hospital randomisation was reported and trial investigators agreed to collaborate (ie, providing individual patient data). Odds ratios (ORs) as primary outcome measure were pooled using logistic regression models. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023431258). Four trials (n=567 patients; 284 VA-ECMO, 283 control) were identified and included. Overall, there was no significant reduction of 30-day death rate with the early use of VA-ECMO (OR 0·93; 95% CI 0·66-1·29). Complication rates were higher with VA-ECMO for major bleeding (OR 2·44; 95% CI 1·55-3·84) and peripheral ischaemic vascular complications (OR 3·53; 95% CI 1·70-7·34). Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent and did not show any benefit for VA-ECMO (pinteraction ≥0·079). VA-ECMO did not reduce 30-day death rate compared with medical therapy alone in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock, and an increase in major bleeding and vascular complications was observed. A careful review of the indication for VA-ECMO in this setting is warranted. Foundation Institut für Herzinfarktforschung.

Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Use and Clinical Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart/Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Pre- and Post-heart Allocation Policy Change Eras.

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices (intra-aortic balloon pump; Impella 2.5, CP, 5.0; venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) increased significantly across the United States for heart transplant candidates after the allocation policy change. Whether this practice change also affected simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) candidates and recipient survival is understudied. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database to identify adult SHK recipients between January 2010 and March 2022. The population was stratified into pre- and post-heart allocation change cohorts. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare 1-y survival rates. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the effect of allocation period on patient survival. Recipient outcomes bridged with eligible tMCS devices were compared in the post-heart allocation era. In a separate analysis, SHK waitlist mortality was evaluated between the allocation eras. A total of 1548 SHK recipients were identified, and 1102 were included in the final cohort (534 pre-allocation and 568 post-allocation change). tMCS utilization increased from 17.9% to 51.6% after the allocation change, with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use rising most significantly. However, 1-y post-SHK survival remained unchanged in the full cohort (log-rank P = 0.154) and those supported with any of the eligible tMCS devices. In a separate analysis (using a larger cohort of all SHK listings), SHK waitlist mortality at 1 y was significantly lower in the current allocation era ( P = 0.002). Despite the remarkable increase in tMCS use in SHK candidates after the heart allocation change, 1 y posttransplant survival remained unchanged. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.

Tickle Me ECMO…Differences and Outcomes Unearthed for Kids Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Associated Disease.

Tickle Me ECMO…Differences and Outcomes Unearthed for Kids Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Associated Disease.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction

Effect of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation timing on tricuspid valve surgery outcomes

ObjectivesTricuspid valve surgery is associated with high rates of shock and in-hospital mortality. Early initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after surgery may provide right ventricular support and improve survival. We evaluated mortality in patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery based on the timing of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MethodsAll consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated or combined surgical tricuspid valve repair or replacement from 2010 to 2022 requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use were stratified by initiation in the operating room (Early) versus outside of the operating room (Late). Variables associated with in-hospital mortality were explored using logistic regression. ResultsThere were 47 patients who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: 31 Early and 16 Late. Mean age was 55.6 years (standard deviation, 16.8), 25 (54.3%) were in New York Heart Association class III/IV, 30 (60.8%) had left-sided valve disease, and 11 (23.4%) had undergone prior cardiac surgery. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 60.0% (interquartile range, 45-65), right ventricular size was moderately to severely increased in 26 patients (60.5%), and right ventricular function was moderately to severely reduced in 24 patients (51.1%). Concomitant left-sided valve surgery was performed in 25 patients (53.2%). There were no differences in baseline characteristics or invasive measurements immediately before surgery between the Early and Late groups. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated 194 (23.0-840.0) minutes after cardiopulmonary bypass in the Late venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group. In-hospital mortality was 35.5% (n = 11) in the Early group versus 68.8% (n = 11) in the Late group (P = .037). Late venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 4.00; 1.10-14.50; P = .035). ConclusionsEarly postoperative initiation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after tricuspid valve surgery in high-risk patients may be associated with improvement in postoperative hemodynamics and in-hospital mortality.

Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcome during index hospitalization and 3 years after interventions. This is an observational retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective, high-risk PCI and receiving VA-ECMO for cardiopulmonary support. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and 3- year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates. Secondary endpoints were vascular complications, bleeding, and procedural success. Nine patients were included in total. All patients were considered inoperable by the local heart team, and 1 patient had a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). All patients were hospitalized for an acute heart failure episode 30 days before the index procedure. Severe left ventricular dysfunction was present in 8 patients. The main target vessel was the left main coronary artery in 5 cases. Complex PCI techniques were used: bifurcations with 2 stents in 8 patients, rotational atherectomy was performed in 3, and coronary lithoplasty in 1 case. PCI was successful in all of the patients with revascularization of all target and additional lesions. Eight of the 9 patients survived for at least 30 days after the procedure, and 7 patients survived for 3 years after the procedure. Regarding the complication rate, 2 patients suffered from limb ischemia and were treated by an antegrade perfusion, 1 patient had a femoral perforation that needed surgical repair, 6 patients had a hematoma, 5 patients had a significant drop in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl and received blood transfusions, 2 patients were treated for septicemia, and 2 patients needed hemodialysis. Prophylactic use of VA-ECMO in elective patients is an acceptable strategy for revascularization by high-risk coronary percutaneous interventions with good long-term outcomes for patients considered inoperable when a clear clinical benefit is expected. Regarding the potential risk of complications due to a VA-ECMO system, the selection of candidates in our series was based on a multiparameter analysis. The two main triggers in favor of prophylactic VA-ECMO in our studies were the presence of a recent heart failure episode and the high probability of periprocedural prolonged impairment of the coronary flow through the major epicardial artery.