Three-dimensional echocardiography has widely transformed the world of cardiac imaging over the last decade. One of the most outstanding changes is that cardiologists have stopped believing dogmatically in formulas which, based on linear parameters, are able to calculate the area of different cardiac structures assuming a regular and symmetrical morphology and a single plane spatial arrangement. Multiple scientific evidence has been published against this method, since calculations based on this type of formulas can be quite different from real measurements. (1) Calculation of the left ventricular outflow tract for the assessment of patients with severe aortic stenosis is currently the most controversial example. Many discrepancies between parameters disappear with the use of threedimensional echocardiography. (2, 3) The mitral valve annulus is a fibrous ellipticallyshaped region which becomes more circular in diastole than in systole (4) and serves as attachment of the mitral leaflets. The annulus has a saddle-like contour and is not located in a single plane, but has portions called trigones which are closer to the ventricular apex, and middle parts of the anterior and posterior leaflets which are closer to the left atrial roof, the middle part of the anterior leaflet being slightly higher. Its normal average area is 7 cm2 and is modified during the cardiac cycle, increasing at end-systole and reaching its maximal dimension at end-diastole, (5) with an average 25% change in mitral valve area. Area reduction starts with atrial contraction, and is minimal during mid-systole. It is also important to know that the mitral annulus is displaced towards the atrium in diastole and towards the ventricle in systole. Once the mitral annulus characteristics are known, it is easy to understand the limitations of calculating the mitral annulus area by measuring its diameter in a single plane, a method usually employed to estimate the blood volume passing through it for further quantification of mitral or aortic regurgitant volumes. Three-dimensional echocardiography allows direct quantification of the area of any cardiac structure without using mathematical formulas. Therefore, we may say that the measurement is “more real” as it is not based on a geometrical approach. The technique is not free from limitations (1) and cannot replace twodimensional echocardiography in all cases; yet, it af-
Read full abstract