Use Of Surveillance Imaging Research Articles

Posttreatment Surveillance Imaging After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

The role of surveillance imaging after treatment for head and neck cancer is controversial and evidence to support decision-making is limited. To determine the use of surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients with head and neck cancer in remission after completion of chemoradiation. This was a retrospective, comparative effectiveness research review of adult patients who had achieved a complete metabolic response to initial treatment for head and neck cancer as defined by having an unequivocally negative positron emission tomography (PET) scan using the PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) scale within the first 6 months of completing therapy. The medical records of 501 consecutive patients who completed definitive radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) for newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck between January 2014 and June 2022 were reviewed. Surveillance imaging was defined as the acquisition of a PET with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or CT of the head and neck region in the absence of any clinically suspicious symptoms and/or examination findings. For remaining patients, subsequent surveillance after the achievement of a complete metabolic response to initial therapy was performed on an observational basis in the setting of routine follow-up using history-taking and physical examination, including endoscopy. This expectant approach led to imaging only in the presence of clinically suspicious symptoms and/or physical examination findings. Local-regional control, overall survival, and progression-free survival based on assignment to either the surveillance imaging or expectant management cohort. This study included 340 patients (mean [SD] age, 59 [10] years; 201 males [59%]; 88 Latino patients [26%]; 145 White patients [43%]) who achieved a complete metabolic response during this period. There was no difference in 3-year local-regional control, overall survival, progression-free survival, or freedom from distant metastasis between patients treated with surveillance imaging vs those treated expectantly. In this comparative effectiveness research, imaging-based surveillance failed to improve outcomes compared with expectant management for patients who were seemingly in remission after completion of primary radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Impact of Surveillance Imaging in Detecting Local and Metastatic Lung Recurrences Among Patients with Sarcomas of the Extremities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The surveillance guidelines following treatment completion for patients with high-grade sarcomas of the extremities are based largely upon expert opinions and consensus. In the current meta-analysis, we aim to study the utility of surveillance imaging to diagnose local and metastatic pulmonary relapses among patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas and primary bone sarcomas. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of surveillance imaging to diagnose local and metastatic pulmonary relapse among patients with sarcoma of the extremities. In addition, impact of surveillance imaging on overall survival was assessed. Heterogeneity among eligible studies was evaluated by I2 statistics. Sensitivity analysis was assessed using influence plots and Baujat plots. Ten studies including 2160 patients with sarcoma were found eligible. For diagnoses of local recurrence based on surveillance imaging (nine studies, 1917 patients), the estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 13.6%, 99.5%, and 78.15, respectively. Only 16.7% of local recurrences were diagnosed based on imaging. For diagnoses of metastatic pulmonary recurrence (eight studies; 1868 patients), estimated sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 76.1%, 99.3%, and 1059.9, respectively. A sensitivity analysis showed significant heterogeneity among included studies. None of the included studies showed an overall-survival benefit with the use of surveillance imaging. The current meta-analysis challenges the notion of routine use of imaging to detect local relapse, while favoring chest imaging, using either chest radiography or computed tomography scan, for surveillance. Further studies are required to study the ideal surveillance strategy including timing and imaging modality.

Imaging Utilization Patterns in the Follow-Up of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas in the United States

This study aimed to describe patterns of imaging utilization after resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma in the United States, assess for potential disparities, and evaluate temporal trends. A retrospective cohort study using a national database of private payer claims data was performed to determine the utilization rate of extremity and chest imaging in a 5-year postoperative follow-up period for patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated between 2007 and 2019. Imaging utilization was assessed according to patient demographics (age, sex, race and ethnicity, and region of residency), calendar year of surgery, and postoperative year. Associations of demographic variables with imaging use were assessed using chi-square tests, trends in imaging use were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test or linear regression, and associations of postoperative year with imaging use were evaluated with the Pearson Correlation coefficient. A total of 3707 patients were included. Most patients received at least 1 chest (74%) and extremity (53%) imaging examination during their follow-up period. The presence of surveillance imaging was significantly associated with age (P < 0.0001) and region (P=0.0029). Over the study period, there was an increase in use of extremity MRI (P < 0.05) and ultrasound (P < 0.01) and chest CT (P < 0.0001) and a decrease in use of chest radiographs (P < 0.0001). Imaging use declined over postoperative years (decrease by 85%-92% from year 1-5). In conclusion, the use of surveillance imaging varied according to patient demographics and has increased for extremity MRI and ultrasound and chest CT over the study period.

Disparities in surveillance imaging after breast conserving surgery for primary DCIS.

6516 Background: Due to the elevated risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) after diagnosis with primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), professional guidelines recommend surveillance screening within 6-12 months (mo) after completion of initial local treatment and annually thereafter. To characterize adherence to these guidelines, we explored longitudinal patterns of utilization and factors associated with the use of surveillance imaging (mammography, MRI, ultrasound) for women with primary DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ± radiotherapy (RT) within 6 mo of diagnosis. Methods: A treatment-stratified random sample of patients diagnosed with screen-detected and biopsy-confirmed DCIS in 2008-15 was selected from 1,330 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities (up to 20/site) in the US. All imaging exams coded as asymptomatic were collected from 6 mo up to 10 years (yr) post-diagnosis. Time was defined according to 12-mo long surveillance periods. To be included in a given surveillance period, women had to be alive and free of a new breast cancer diagnosis through the end of the period. Women were classified as “consistent” screeners if they had at least one surveillance screen during each period, for the first 5 yr post-treatment or until censoring, whichever occurred first. Repeated measures multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to model receipt of surveillance breast imaging over time. The model included clinical and socioeconomic features. Results: The final analytic cohort contained 12,559 women; 8,989 (71.6%) received RT after BCS. Median age was 60 yr (interquartile range: 52-69) and median follow-up was 5.6 yr (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-5.7). Among women who received BCS (instead of BCS+RT), 62.5% (79.7%) underwent surveillance imaging within 6-18 mo after diagnosis. 38.7% (54.0%) were categorized as “consistent” screeners. Compared to white women, Black women were less likely to receive surveillance screening after treatment for primary DCIS (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94). Hispanic ethnicity had a similar association (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) compared to non-Hispanic ethnicity. Women with private insurance, compared to government insurance, were more likely to receive screening (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30). Prognostic tumor features indicative of a higher risk of subsequent iIBC, including higher grade, presence of comedonecrosis, and hormone receptor-negative DCIS, were not associated with screening uptake. Conclusions: Despite guidelines recommending annual surveillance imaging, many women with primary DCIS do not undergo regular imaging after BCS. The findings from this US-based study suggest that disparities in screening uptake are associated with race/ethnicity and insurance status rather than prognostic tumor features.

Surveillance Scans in Lymphoma: Friend or Foe?

Advancements in the treatment of lymphoma over the last few decades have allowed more patients to achieve a remission after the completion of therapy. Due to the improvement in response rates, methods to detect recurrence early and accurately during follow-up, especially in patients with potential curable aggressive lymphomas, are a key. Observation has always involved close clinical follow-up with the use of physical exams and routine labs, but rapid changes in technology have allowed CT scans, PET scans, and MRIs to become an integral part of managing patients with lymphoma. While the utility of scans in initial staging and immediately after completion of therapy is well established, the use of these imaging modalities for monitoring recurrence in lymphoma patients is still controversial. Patient advocacy groups and other regulatory committees have questioned the frequency and in some cases even the need for these tests in patients without evidence of active disease given the concern for radiation-associated health risks. Additionally, the extent to which this form of testing impacts the psyche of our patients is not completely known. Given the numerous questions raised about the benefits, safety, and cost-effectiveness of CT imaging, firm guidelines are needed at this time in standard practice and within our clinical trials to limit the use of surveillance imaging. Such efforts are expected to improve the utility of these scans in asymptomatic patients, reduce healthcare costs, and reduce patient exposure to radiation.

Extraneural Metastases in an Operated Case of Pinealoblastoma Identified on Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Extraneural (EN) metastases and leptomeningeal (LM) metastases from certain primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors, such as pinealoblastomas, are not very common and mostly detected on autopsy. Clinical detection of this entity is, however, very rare and can be attributed to increasing overall survival or probably increased use of surveillance imaging in patients with brain tumors. We demonstrate through this case the potential adjunctive role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the identification of asymptomatic LM/EN metastases in high-risk primary CNS tumors.

Setting quality improvement priorities for women receiving systemic therapy (ST) for early stage breast cancer (EBC) using population level administrative data.

299 Background: Routine evaluation of evidence informed quality measures (QM) can drive improvement in cancer systems by highlighting potential gaps in care. Targeting quality improvement at QMs that demonstrate substantial variation has the potential to make the largest impact on quality at a population level. We aimed to use variation in performance to set priorities for improving the quality of ST for women with EBC. Methods: EBC cases diagnosed 2006 – 2010 in Ontario, Canada were identified in the Ontario Cancer Registry and linked deterministically to multiple health care databases. A panel of QMs, previously developed to be operationalized for administrative data, was applied to reflect the quality of ST. Each QM was evaluated in all patients who met the inclusion criteria for the individual measure. QMs were ranked based on institutional variation in performance using the mean absolute difference (MAD). Results: We identified 28,303 patients, treated at 84 institutions. The performance of each QM is listed in Table 1. Timely receipt of ST, febrile neutropenia (FN) secondary prophylaxis, emergency room visits or hospitalizations, receipt of hormonal therapy (HT) and the use of surveillance imaging represented the 5 QM that demonstrated the greatest variation. Conclusions: Considerable institutional-level variation highlights potentially actionable areas of improvement [Table: see text]

Limited use of surveillance imaging following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

ObjectivesTo evaluate the utilization of follow-up imaging after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in nationally representative data. Patients and methodsUsing Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results data linked to Medicare records, we identified patients with RCC who received nephrectomy from 1991 to 2007. Patients were stratified by tumor stage. Postoperative chest and abdominal imaging (including chest x-ray, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging; abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging) was assessed. Observed surveillance imaging frequency was compared to published protocols. Predictors of initial and continued yearly surveillance imaging were identified. ResultsAgreement between observed imaging frequency and evidence-based surveillance protocols was low, particularly for patients with T2–T4 disease. For patients who were not censored before 13 months, initial abdominal and chest surveillance imaging was obtained in 69% and 78% of patients, respectively. By year 5, 28% and 39% of patients with high-risk disease (T3 or T4), as compared to 21% and 25% of patients with low to moderate risk disease (T1 and T2), received yearly surveillance abdominal and chest imaging, respectively. High-risk disease was predictive of initial chest (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38) and abdominal (OR = 1.6) imaging, as well as continued yearly chest (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73) and abdominal (HR = 0.74) imaging surveillance. For abdominal imaging, more contemporary year of surgery was predictive of initial (1997–2001, OR = 1.6; 2002–2007, OR = 2.4) and continued yearly surveillance (1997–2001, HR = 0.82; 2002–2007; HR = 0.67). ConclusionsIn the Medicare population, surveillance imaging is performed in a limited number of patients following nephrectomy for RCC. However, increasing tumor stage is predictive of both increased chest and abdominal imaging surveillance.

Utility of PET/CT for surveillance of asymptomatic patients with resected stage III or IV melanoma.

9051 Background: Evidence-based guidelines for the use of surveillance imaging in melanoma patients are lacking. Here, we present a retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic experience using PET/CT (...

Follow-up imaging in the first two years after nephrectomy for T1 RCC: Over-use or necessary care?

Objective: We sought to study patterns of imaging for follow-up after surgery for stage T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at a single institution. We hypothesised that there would be significant variation in the use of surveillance imaging. Methods and materials: We evaluated the two-year follow-up of 317 consecutive patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy who were found to have pT1 RCC. Follow-up imaging data were collected. Surgical characteristics and tumour pathology data were analysed via a Poisson regression model to evaluate the incidence rate ratio for frequency of imaging based on each variable. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors correlated with concordance with current imaging guidelines. Results: A total of 1016 imaging exams were performed after surgery on 268 patients. These studies identified four tumour recurrences: two local and two lung. The overall recurrence rate was 1.49%. Three recurrences were found within a two-year postoperative window, and one was recorded on the patient’s last clinic note after two years. Of 66 imaging exams with findings suspicious for recurrence, 62 were found to be false positives. All statistical analyses on a subgroup of 162 patients with full two-year follow-up failed to demonstrate any correlation between clinicopathologic variables and the frequency of abdominal imaging or concordance with current imaging guidelines. Conclusions: Frequent follow-up imaging studies were obtained despite a low recurrence rate. There was a high rate of false-positive findings on routine exams. No clinicopathologic criteria were identified that were correlated with increased imaging frequency.

MP50-11 LOW-YIELD OF SURVEILLANCE IMAGING AFTER SURGERY FOR T1 KIDNEY CANCER

You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Evaluation and Staging III1 Apr 2015MP50-11 LOW-YIELD OF SURVEILLANCE IMAGING AFTER SURGERY FOR T1 KIDNEY CANCER Michael Feuerstein, John Musser, Matthew Kent, Michael Chevinsky, Eugene Cha, Simon Kimm, William Hilton, Timothy Donahue, Jonathan Coleman, Sherri Donat, and Paul Russo Michael FeuersteinMichael Feuerstein More articles by this author , John MusserJohn Musser More articles by this author , Matthew KentMatthew Kent More articles by this author , Michael ChevinskyMichael Chevinsky More articles by this author , Eugene ChaEugene Cha More articles by this author , Simon KimmSimon Kimm More articles by this author , William HiltonWilliam Hilton More articles by this author , Timothy DonahueTimothy Donahue More articles by this author , Jonathan ColemanJonathan Coleman More articles by this author , Sherri DonatSherri Donat More articles by this author , and Paul RussoPaul Russo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2922AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Kidney cancer surveillance guidelines, which are based on pathological stage and risk of recurrence, were recently published; however, the detection rates of imaging and impact on clinical decision-making have not been widely studied. Our objective was to examine the mode of relapse detection and subsequent treatment in patients with low-risk (pT1, N0, Nx) disease. METHODS Retrospective study on 1822 patients treated with partial or radical nephrectomy for low-risk kidney cancer from 2000-2012. Patients with another cancer diagnosis or synchronous, bilateral disease were excluded. Scans for chest imaging (X-ray or CT) and abdominal imaging (CT, MRI or ultrasound) were tabulated. For those patients with relapse, the site, mode of detection, and symptoms were recorded. RESULTS 37 patients relapsed with a median follow-up of 4.2 years for patients who did not relapse. In 28 (76%) patients, relapse was detected by imaging alone while 9 (24%) patients presented with symptoms. Of the patients who relapsed by imaging, 19 (68%) were treated immediately while 9 (32%) continued observation. During the first 3 years of follow-up, 7735 scans were performed to detect 15 relapses, with 10 patients receiving immediate treatment. The median number of scans per patient per year for the first 3 years was 1.7 (interquartile range, 0.7, 1.3) including 33% CT, 4% MRI, 35% X-ray, and 28% ultrasounds. CONCLUSIONS Our findings support guideline recommendations for more judicious use of surveillance imaging in the first 3 years for low-risk patients as there is a low-rate of relapse, nearly a quarter of patients with relapse are detected by symptoms and a third of patients detected by imaging will not require immediate treatment. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e615 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Michael Feuerstein More articles by this author John Musser More articles by this author Matthew Kent More articles by this author Michael Chevinsky More articles by this author Eugene Cha More articles by this author Simon Kimm More articles by this author William Hilton More articles by this author Timothy Donahue More articles by this author Jonathan Coleman More articles by this author Sherri Donat More articles by this author Paul Russo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Surveillance imaging following colon cancer resection: Universal or risk-based?

307 Background: Current colon cancer surveillance guidelines recommend annual imaging for all patients following curative resection. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate variation in surveillance practices following colon cancer resection. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 66 years old with stage I-III colon cancer that underwent surgical resection in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database (July 2001 through December 2007) with at least 3 years of follow-up was performed. Medicare claims for PET and CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis performed after surgical resection were recorded and analyzed. In order to evaluate the use of definitive treatment (DT) for presumed recurrent disease, we identified patients who had undergone lung, liver, or colorectal resection during follow-up. Results: Of 22,544 patients who underwent primary resection of colon cancer, 13,753 (61.0%) underwent PET and/or CT after resection and 1,109 (4.52%) underwent at least 1 DT. The mean number of imaging performed for patients who did not undergo DT was 1.68. Within this group, the utilization of PET and/or CT varied by stage, with 14.1%, 22.4%, and 42.2% of patients with stage I, II, and III disease undergoing imaging, respectively. The most significant factor associated with PET and/or CT was tumor stage with an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% CI 1.70-2.02, P&lt;0.001) for stage II disease and 4.56 (95% CI 4.17-4.99, P&lt;0.001) for stage III disease compared to stage I disease. Additional factors significantly associated with PET and/or CT included year of diagnosis and SEER region. Among patients who did undergo DT, the mean number of PET and/or CT performed was 5.37 but the majority of imaging studies were performed 4 months prior to DT (mean 2.95). Conclusions: There is a high degree of variation in the use of surveillance imaging among elderly patients with localized colon cancer although some of this variation appears to be associated with stage at presentation. Our findings highlight discordance between clinical practice and surveillance guidelines. Further study is needed to understand the basis and appropriateness of clinical decision making that departs from guideline-based care.

Role of routine imaging in detecting recurrent lymphoma: A review of 258 patients with relapsed aggressive non‐Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma

After first-line therapy, patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-HL are followed up closely for early signs of relapse. The current follow-up practice with frequent use of surveillance imaging is highly controversial and warrants a critical evaluation. Therefore, a retrospective multicenter study of relapsed HL and aggressive non-HL (nodal T-cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas) was conducted. All included patients had been diagnosed during the period 2002-2011 and relapsed after achieving complete remission on first-line therapy. Characteristics and outcome of imaging-detected relapses were compared with other relapses. A total of 258 patients with recurrent lymphoma were included in the study. Relapse investigations were initiated outside preplanned visits in 52% of the patients. Relapse detection could be attributed to patient-reported symptoms alone or in combination with abnormal blood tests or physical examination in 64% of the patients. Routine imaging prompted relapse investigations in 27% of the patients. The estimated number of routine scans per relapse was 91-255 depending on the lymphoma subtype. Patients with imaging-detected relapse had lower disease burden (P = 0.045) and reduced risk of death following relapse (hazard ratio = 0.62, P = 0.02 in multivariate analysis). Patient-reported symptoms are still the most common factor for detecting lymphoma relapse and the high number of scans per relapse calls for improved criteria for use of surveillance imaging. However, imaging-detected relapse was associated with lower disease burden and a possible survival advantage. The future role of routine surveillance imaging should be defined in a randomized trial.

Use of Surveillance Imaging Following Treatment of Small Renal Masses

With the increasing incidence of small renal masses, there is greater use of ablation, nephron sparing surgery and surveillance compared to radical nephrectomy. However, patterns of care in the use of posttreatment imaging remain uncharacterized. The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of posttreatment imaging after various treatments for small renal mass. Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results)-Medicare data during 2005 to 2009, we identified 1,682 subjects diagnosed with small renal mass and treated with open partial nephrectomy (330), minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (160), open radical nephrectomy (404), minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (535), thermal ablation (212) and surveillance (42). Use of imaging was compared within 24 months of treatment and multivariate regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with increased imaging use. On adjusted analyses thermal ablation was associated with almost eightfold greater odds of surveillance imaging compared with open radical nephrectomy (OR 7.7, 95% CI 1.01-59.4). Specifically, thermal ablation was associated with increased computerized tomography (OR 5.28) and magnetic resonance imaging (OR 2.19) use and decreased ultrasound use (OR 0.59). Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (OR 3.28) and open partial nephrectomy (OR 3.19) were also associated with increased computerized tomography use to a lesser extent. Subjects undergoing nephron sparing surgery undergo more posttreatment imaging compared to open radical nephrectomy. Although possibly associated with lower morbidity, thermal ablation is associated with significantly greater use of imaging compared to other small renal mass treatments. This may increase costs and radiation exposure, although further study is needed for confirmation.

The use of routine surveillance imaging scans in women with early breast cancer (EBC) treated in Ontario, Canada.

6628 Background: Over use of routine surveillance imaging to detect recurrence in women with EBC was recently identified as one of the top five opportunities to improve the quality of cancer care by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. We undertook a population level assessment of the current practice of surveillance imaging in EBC women treated in Ontario Canada. Methods: Incident early breast cancer patients diagnosed 01/07 – 12/09 in Ontario, Canada were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry. Patient records were linked deterministically to provincial health care databases to provide comprehensive medical follow-up. Basic (chest x-ray, abdominal x-ray and abdominal ultrasound) and advanced (computed tomography [CT] or bone scans) surveillance imaging scans completed during the first and second year of follow-up care (starting 6 months after surgery or upon completion of adjuvant chemotherapy) were identified. Logistic regression models were used to identify covariates associated with advanced surveillance imaging. Results: 16,981 EBC patients were included in the analysis of which 7,907(46.6%) received chemotherapy. In the first year of follow up care, 8,311 (48.9%) had at least 1 basic imaging test, while 4,916 (29.0%) had advanced imaging. This fell to 45.7% (basic) and 25.1% (advanced) in the second year of follow-up. Bone scans were the most common advanced imaging test (14.5%), followed by CT thorax (10.8%). On multivariable analysis age, stage, the use of chemotherapy and comorbidity were associated with increased use of advanced surveillance imaging (Table). Significant geographic variation was also demonstrated. Conclusions: Surveillance imaging was common in the first two years of follow-up for EBC patients. While appropriate for symptom driven investigation, attention should be paid to the routine use of surveillance imaging in EBC women during follow-up care. [Table: see text]

Long-Term Outcomes of Renal Tumor Radio Frequency Ablation Stratified by Tumor Diameter: Size Matters

Renal tumor size influences the efficacy of radio frequency ablation but identification of confident size cutoffs has been limited by small numbers and short followup. We evaluated tumor size related outcomes after radio frequency ablation for patients with adequate (greater than 3 years) followup. We identified 159 tumors treated with radio frequency ablation as primary treatment. Disease-free survival was defined as the time from definitive treatment to local recurrence, detection of metastasis or the most recent imaging showing no evidence of disease. Patients were evaluated with contrast enhancing imaging preoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months and at least annually thereafter. Median tumor size was 2.4 cm (range 0.9 to 5.4) with a median followup of 54 months (range 1.5 to 120). Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed in 72% of the 150 tumors that had pre-ablation biopsy (94%). The 3 and 5-year disease-free survival was comparable at 92% and 91% overall, and was dependent on tumor size, being 96% and 95% for tumors smaller than 3.0 cm and 79% and 79%, respectively, for tumors 3 cm or larger (p=0.001). Most failures (14 of 18) were local, either incomplete ablations or local recurrences. This is an intent to treat analysis and, therefore, includes patients ultimately found to have benign tumors, although outcomes were comparable in patients with cancer. Radio frequency ablation treatment success of the small renal mass is strongly correlated with tumor size. Radio frequency ablation provides excellent and durable outcomes, particularly in tumors smaller than 3 cm. Of tumors 3 cm or larger, approximately 20% will recur such that alternative treatment techniques should be considered. However, most treatment failures are local and are often successfully treated with another ablation session.

Imaging in pediatric patients: Time to think again about surveillance

Despite concerns regarding ionizing radiation exposures from diagnostic imaging procedures in pediatric patients, many are deemed unavoidable or even mandated by treatment protocols. A prior review at our institution found patients with lymphoma had a higher median cumulative radiation exposure (191 mSv) versus other oncology subgroups (61 mSv). Estimations of cumulative diagnostic radiation exposures were tabulated for 5 years from the first diagnostic scan for 30 consecutive lymphoma patients diagnosed in 2001. Each individual imaging procedure was reviewed and classified as protocol mandated or discretionary (for disease surveillance, good patient care or radiologist request). Almost all patients (28/29) received chemotherapy; one had surgery only. Individual cumulative radiation exposures ranged from 10 to 642 mSv. Over 5 years, 690 procedures were performed; 303 (44%) X-rays, 203 (29%) CTs, 157 (23%) radionucleotide, and 27 (4%) interventional procedures. Of these, 238 (34%) were protocol required and 452 (66%) discretionary (224 as part of good patient care for a co-morbid illness and 228 for evaluation of possible disease progression/surveillance). A total of 86/217 (40%) studies (including 43 CTs and 38 radionucleotide scans) were performed when the recurrence risk was low (>2 years off therapy). The majority of ionizing radiation procedures in this lymphoma cohort were discretionary. Given the excellent outcome of this group and the long-term risks; rational use of discretionary surveillance procedures is necessary. Guidelines for the appropriate use of surveillance imaging based on probability of risk recurrence must be developed in order to minimize ionizing radiation exposure.

Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Partial Nephrectomy of Solitary Kidneys

We examined outcomes after partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors in a solitary kidney to determine the extent to which patient, surgery and tumor specific variables influenced the glomerular filtration rate and local recurrence postoperatively. Demographics, renal function, comorbidities, renal cell carcinoma history, and operative and pathological data were recorded. The effect on changes in early and late postoperative glomerular filtration rate and local recurrence were analyzed. In 84 patients undergoing a total of 89 partial nephrectomies the mean immediate postoperative decrease in the glomerular filtration rate in those with no ischemia, warm ischemia (mean 12 minutes) and cold ischemia (mean 33 minutes) was 29%, 37% and 45%, respectively (p <0.01). Late glomerular filtration rate decreases were 12%, 6% and 16%, respectively (p = 0.17). Cold ischemia and multiple vascular risk factors were associated with immediate glomerular filtration rate decreases (p = 0.008 and 0.04, respectively). Local recurrence, which developed in 13 patients (18%), was associated with positive margins and T stage (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively). End stage renal disease developed in 3 patients (4%) and an additional 5 (6%) required nephrectomy for local recurrence. Partial nephrectomy generally results in a small decrease in the glomerular filtration rate, and limited warm and cold ischemia does not appear to adversely affect long-term renal function. Positive margins and T stage greater than 2 are the most important predictors of local recurrence in a solitary kidney. They pose a significant risk to end stage renal disease-free survival due to the need for completion nephrectomy in many of these patients. Partial nephrectomy should be considered the standard of care in all patients with tumor in the solitary kidney.

Surveillance imaging in children with medulloblastoma (posterior fossa PNET).

The use of surveillance imaging in children with medulloblastoma has been criticised. The aim of this study was to determine what proportion of relapses are detected by surveillance and whether these are found at a relatively favourable stage. This study was a retrospective review of the medical charts and imaging studies of 89 patients treated at a single children's cancer centre. Relapse was defined as evidence of an increase in volume of residual tumour of greater than 25% or the presence of metastases, or new onset of positive CSF cytology. Relapse was termed symptomatic if it was diagnosed by tests performed because of new symptoms that occurred in the interval between surveillance examinations. Asymptomatic relapse was diagnosed solely on the basis of surveillance imaging. Survival time to relapse was calculated from the date of the first surgical procedure. Surveillance imaging detected 17 (71%) of the 24 relapses that occurred later than 6 months after diagnosis. All seven patients who presented with symptoms between scans have died, with a median survival from relapse of 5 months. Median survival from relapse in the patients detected by surveillance was 44 months, and four remain alive at 44-75 months. The patients detected by surveillance tended to have less advanced disease, which was more amenable to salvage therapy. This type of study cannot prove that surveillance imaging improves survival in children with medulloblastoma because of the effects of lead time and length biases. Despite this, surveillance does appear to be effective in detecting potentially curable medulloblastoma relapses and should be offered to all patients.