Use Of Surgical Energy Research Articles

Knowledge of energy-based devices among surgical residents: a cross-sectional study.

This study evaluates the knowledge of surgical residents in a tertiary hospital regarding the operational principles, potential complications, and mechanisms of energy devices used in surgery. A 16-question test was developed using educational materials in the "Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)" program, prepared by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) for educational purposes, and from literature on energy devices. The test was shared online with surgical branch residents via Google Forms, and they were asked to complete it. Participants were given one week to complete the test and return the results online. A total of 108 residents voluntarily participated in the study. The average number of correct answers was 6.5 out of 16. There was no significant difference between the correct answer rates for surgical branches. However, an increase in surgical seniority was associated with a higher number of correct answers (P < 0.001). Theoretical education about energy devices in surgical training needs to be improved. Surgical residents reported insufficient knowledge regarding the devices' operational principles and complication mechanisms.

Hybrid Train-The-Trainer course for the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy certificates improves self-confidence in knowledge of surgical energy and develops teaching skills: a feasibility study.

Several well-trained expert instructors who completed the "Train-The-Trainer (TTT)" course are required to disseminate the safe use of surgical energy devices, which can be learned through the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program. This study aimed to explore whether the hybrid FUSE TTT course is feasible and effective, which can improve teaching skills of surgical energy. The hybrid TTT course, which was designed to train FUSE-certified personnel as instructors, comprised three virtual sessions spread over 5h in total and a 1-day in-person training, followed by a 100-min FUSE electrosurgery hands-on workshop in practice as an instructor. The participants reported on self-confidence regarding knowledge of various energy devices or adverse events before, immediately after, and 6months after the course. Participants and experienced FUSE instructors assessed the trainees' presentation skills at the beginning of the in-person training and after the hands-on workshop. The primary outcomes were the feasibility and completion rate of the entire course. Seventeen participants completed the entire couse; most (94%) were satisfied with the course. Self-confidence in knowledge about various contents improved significantly: the fundamentals of electrosurgery (post, p < 0.001; 6months, p = 0.01), mechanism and prevention of adverse events (post, p = 0.001; 6months, p = 0.04), monopolar instruments (post, p = 0.002; 6months, p = 0.01), bipolar instruments (post, p = 0.01; 6months, p = 0.06), and integration with other medical devices (post, p = 0.006; 6months, p = 0.02). The presentation skill index scores of self- and peer assessments improved after the in-person training (self-assessment [pre 44 vs. post 56, p < 0.001], peer assessment [pre 39 vs. post 68, p < 0.001]). The hybrid TTT course can provide FUSE-certified personnel with an improved self-confidence concerning knowledge of surgical energy and improve their presentation skills with midterm retention. This can help build trainees' self-confidence as instructors.

Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on the theory of fundamental use of surgical energy

Improving oncological curability and preserving urinary function must be established in robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. To achieve this, it is important to avoid nerve injury by sharp dissection of the avascular plane by the monopolar device and thermal spread. The aim of this study was to improve the robotic TME quality by focusing on the theory of fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE) of the monopolar device and investigating the surgical procedure. In this single-center retrospective study, 26 consecutive patients who underwent robotic TME for rectal cancer at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between June 2022 and August 2022 were included. All surgeries were performed by FUSE-certified surgeons in accordance with FUSE theory, which was, thermal effect = current density (current/area) squared × tissue resistance × contact time. The median age of the patients was 64years (range 40-79years), and 17 patients were male. The median operative time was 287min (range 229-430min); median bleeding volume, 22ml (range 5-223ml); and the median number of harvested lymph nodes, 17 (range 4-40). The conversion rate to open surgery was 0%. A breakdown of Clavien-Dindo classification Grade ≥ II post-operative complications was as follows: surgical site infection, one patient (3.8%); ileus, one patient (3.8%); and urinary dysfunction, one patient (3.8%). No surgery-related or in-hospital deaths occurred. The pathological positive resection margin was not observed. Robotic TME for rectal cancer based on the theory of FUSE can be safely performed, making it a promising surgical procedure. It is suggested that robotic surgeons acquire surgical operation skills with monopolar devices based on the principles of FUSE, which may lead to an increased quality of robotic TME.

Surgeons know that they don't know about the safe use of surgical energy: an international study reveals that the knowledge gap persists.

The rate of electrosurgery complications is 0.1-2.1%. More than 10years ago, SAGES pioneered a well-structured educational program (FUSE) aimed to teach about the safe use of electrosurgery. This inspired the development of similar training programs around the globe. Still, the knowledge gap persists among surgeons, possibly due to the lack of judgment. To investigate factors affecting the level of expertise in electrosurgical safety and their correlation with self-assessment scores among surgeons and surgical residents. We conducted an online survey consisting of 15 questions that could be thematically broken down into 5 blocks. We analyzed how the objective scores were correlated with the self-assessment scores, professional experience, past participation in training programs, and work at a teaching hospital. A total of 145 specialists took part in the survey, including 111 general surgeons and 34s-year surgical residents from Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Kirgizia. Only 9 (8.1%) surgeons scored "excellent," 32 (28.8%) scored "good," and 56 (50.4%) scored "fair." Of all surgical residents participating in the study, only 1 (2.9%) scored "excellent," 9 (26.5%) scored "good," and 11 (32.4%) scored "fair." The test was failed by 14 surgeons (12.6%) and 13 (38.2%) residents. The difference between the trainees and the surgeons was statistically significant. Our multivariate logistic model identified 3 significant factors predisposing to successful performance on the test: past training in the safe use of electrosurgery, professional experience, and work at a teaching hospital. Of all study participants, those with no past training in the safe use of electrosurgery, and non-teaching surgeons were the most realistic about their competencies. We have identified alarming gaps in the knowledge of electrosurgical safety among surgeons. Faculty staff and experienced surgeons scored higher, but past training was the most influential factor in improving knowledge of electrosurgical safety.

Impact of the fundamental use of surgical energy certification on surgeons' behavior and awareness of safe use of energy devices: a cross-sectional survey research.

The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program was established to educate surgeons and trainees to promote awareness and behaviors for the safe use of surgical energy devices. Despite its implementation, the impact of FUSE certification on surgeons' behavior and safety awareness regarding practice of energy devices remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the perceived impact of FUSE certification on surgeons' behavior and awareness regarding the safe use of surgical energy devices. We performed a descriptive cross-sectional survey study, using non probabilistic purposive sampling, and distributed 22-item web-based questionnaires among all 59 FUSE-certified surgeons in Japan, excluding operating room nurses and medical students. The questionnaire items covered demographics, surgical techniques using various energy devices, changes in behavior and safety awareness, communication with colleagues about surgical energy devices, and educational activities related to energy devices. Fifty-seven participants completed the questionnaire (response rate 96.6%). Most surgeons (91.3%) could apply material learned from the FUSE program in practice, especially material related to monopolar electrosurgery. Fifty-six surgeons (98.3%) reported increased awareness of surgical safety, and 35 (61.5%) reported increased communication with operating room personnel about the safe use of energy devices. Moreover, 56 participants (98.3%) indicated a need for systematic education in surgical energy, with participants recommending fellows (94.7% of participants specified that fellows should participate in further education), residents (75.4%), and attending surgeons (63.2%) as the target recipients of this training. Conclusions After FUSE certification, not only did surgeons' knowledge increase, but their energy-related surgical techniques in practice also improved. Furthermore, FUSE-certified surgeons felt that they were more aware of surgical-energy safety and were dedicated to its promotion.

Safer operating room teams: rationale for the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE) hospital compliance module.

The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program was developed by The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to promote the safe use of surgical energy. A curriculum that could be used in hospital educational programs was needed to expand access. The goal of this project was to develop a short, inexpensive, online module that emphasizes key FUSE learning objectives. The accompanying survey assessed perceived relevancy. The SAGES FUSE Committee developed the Hospital Compliance Module. The target audience included all OR personnel. The Module was piloted at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The data were analyzed using Chi-square with Yates' correction two-tailed test. Three-hundred-eighty individuals completed the survey: 198 (52%) surgeons, 139 (37%) nurses, 28 (7%) surgical technicians, and 15 (4%) house staff. For "…the Module taught me valuable information" 155 (41%) responded extremely and 350 (92%) responded at least somewhat. For "As a result of [the Module] how likely are you to change how you set up or use energy devices…?" 103 (27%) responded extremely and 305 (80%) responded at least somewhat. For "How likely are you to recommend this compliance module…?" 143 (38%) responded extremely and 333 (88%) responded at least somewhat. The FUSE Hospital Compliance Module is effective and efficient. It should be considered for widespread distribution by hospitals to enhance staff education.

Educational value of telementoring for a simulation-based fundamental use of surgical energy™ (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized controlled trial in surgical trainees.

The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program accompanied by a bench-top simulation has shown to improve knowledge of the safe use of energy devices. However, there are significant barriers and costs associated with delivering an effective structured simulation curriculum to a widespread international audience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if bench-top simulation FUSE curriculum through telementoring is as effective as a live-in house proctor for electrosurgical training. A two-armed multi-institutional randomized controlled trial was designed, including a 1-h didactic electrosurgery course (FUSE curriculum), followed by a structured 1-h bench-top simulation training session. For the simulation, participants were randomized to either a live proctor who delivered the course on-site (LIVE group), or a proctor from a remote location using videoconferencing platform (TELEM group). Pre- and post-curriculum (immediate and 6months) knowledge and self-perceived comfort and competence were assessed. Data are expressed as median [interquartile range], *p < 0.05. Sixty-five (35 LIVE; 30 TELEM) surgical trainees from three institutions participated. Baseline characteristics were similar. Total score on the exam improved from 47% [40-54] to 78% [71-84]* amongst all participants, with similar immediate post-curriculum scores in the LIVE group compared to the TELEM group (77% [69-83] vs 80% [75-85]). At 6 months, performance on the exam declined significantly for both groups, but remained similar between the two (LIVE: 59% [51-71] vs TELEM: 71% [57-77]). Participants in both groups reported feeling greater comfort and competence post-curriculum (immediate and at 6months) compared to baseline, with no difference between the two groups. A bench-top simulation FUSE course delivered via a telementoring platform seems to improve surgical trainees' knowledge and comfort in the safe use of electrosurgical devices as effectively as when it is delivered by a live proctor, despite long-term decay for both methods.

Fundamental use of surgical energy during endoscopic therapies

Knowledge of the principles of safe use of surgical energy is a critical element in the practice of any endoscopist. We review the basic principles of electrosurgical energy as taught by the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy curriculum and then provide endoscopy-specific applications of these principles. We reviewed the basic principles of electrosurgical energy, including terminology and cellular effects of electrosurgical energy, as well as an overview of various electrosurgical instruments that are used in endoscopy. We then related the principles of electrosurgical energy to common complications seen in endoscopy (e.g., perforation, bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome) and discussed possible techniques to maximize the safety of utilizing electrosurgical energy in procedures such as polypectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic submucosal dissection, and per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Results of the FUSE Evaluation Project in France

The Federation of Visceral and Digestive Surgery (FCVD) is in charge in France of the continuing medical education of digestive surgeons. Since 2016 and in collaboration with SAGES, it has offered the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program as part of the continuing education for surgeons including eLearning and hands-on workshops. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the FUSE program on the participants by participating in a knowledge test and completing a survey. 485 participants fully completed the knowledge test of 18 questions. Post-test assessment showed an increase in the mean score with respect to pre-test assessment, and the surgeons who have participated to the hands-on workshops had a better score. 304 participants filled the survey of 6 questions. The majority were satisfied by the FUSE program and felt that the objectives were achieved. The FUSE program developed by SAGES and adopted by the FCVD in France was very much appreciated by the participants and achieved its educational objectives. Our goal is to spread it as widely as possible to all members of the operating room team.

The safe use of surgical energy devices by surgeons may be overestimated.

Surgical energy injuries are an underappreciated phenomenon. Improper use of surgical energy or poor attention to patient safety can result in operating room fires, tissue injuries, and interferences with other electronic devices, while rare complications can be devastatingly severe. Despite this, there is no current standard requirement for educating surgeons on the safe use of energy-based devices or evaluation of electrosurgery (ES) education in residency training, credentialing, or practice. The study aimed to assess the current baseline knowledge of surgeons and surgical trainees with regards to ES across varying experiences at a tertiary level care center. Surgeons and surgical trainees from seven surgical specialties (General Surgery, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Orthopedic Surgery, Urology, and Otorhinolaryngology) at a tertiary level care hospital were tested. Testing included an evaluation regarding their background training and experiences with ES-related adverse events and a 15 multiple-choice-question exam testing critical knowledge of ES. A total of 134 surveys were sent out with 72 responses (53.7%). The mean quiz score was 51.5 ± 15.5% (passing score was 80%). Of staff surgeons, 33/65 (50.8%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 54.9 and 53.3%, respectively (range 33.3-86.7%). Of surgical trainees, 39/69 (56.5%) completed the survey with mean and median scores of 48.6 and 46.7%, respectively (range 13.3-80.0%). There were no statistically significant differences based on training status (p = 0.08), previous training (p = 0.24), number of cases (p = 0.06), or specialty (p = 0.689). Surgeons and surgical trainees both have a significant knowledge gap in the safe and effective use of surgical energy devices, regardless of surgical specialty and despite what they feel was adequate training. The knowledge gap is not improved with experience. A formal surgical energy education program should be a requirement for residency training or credentialing.

FUSE certification enhances performance on a virtual computer based simulator for dispersive electrode placement.

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has developed the fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE) didactic curriculum in order to further understanding of the safe use of surgical energy. The virtual electrosurgical skill trainer (VEST) is being developed as a complementary simulation-based curriculum, with several modules already existing. Subsequently, a new VEST module has been developed about dispersive electrode placement. The purpose of this study is to assess knowledge about dispersive electrode placement in surgeons and surgical trainees in addition to describing a new VEST module. Forty-six subjects (n = 46) were recruited for participation at the 2016 SAGES conference Learning Center. Subjects were asked to complete demographic surveys, a five-question pre-test, and a five-question post-test after completing the VEST dispersive electrode module. Subjects were then asked to rate different aspects of the module using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire. Mean pre-simulator and post-simulator assessment scores were 1.5 and 3.4, respectively, with Wilcoxon signed rank analysis showing a significant difference in the means (p < 0.05). Subjects were grouped by the presence (n = 12) or absence (n = 31) of prior FUSE experience and by training level. Mann-Whitney U testing showed no significant difference in pre-simulator assessment scores between attending surgeons and trainees (p > 0.05). In those with and without FUSE exposure, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was seen in pre-simulator assessment scores, and no significant difference in Likert scale assessment scores was seen. This study demonstrated a new VEST educational module. Consistently high Likert assessment scores showed that users felt that the VEST module helped their understanding of dispersive electrode placement. Additionally, the study reflected a potential knowledge deficit in the safe use of dispersive electrodes in the surgical community, also demonstrating that even some exposure to the FUSE curriculum developed by SAGES provides increased awareness about dispersive electrode use.

The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose.

Adverse events due to energy device use in surgical operating rooms are a daily occurrence. These occur at a rate of approximately 1-2 per 1000 operations. Hundreds of operating room fires occur each year in the United States, some causing severe injury and even mortality. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) therefore created the first comprehensive educational curriculum on the safe use of surgical energy devices, called Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE). This paper describes the history, development, and purpose of this important training program for all members of the operating room team. The databases of SAGES and the FUSE committee as well as personal photographs and documents of members of the FUSE task force were used to establish a brief history of the FUSE program from its inception to its current status. The authors were able to detail all aspects of the history, development, and national as well as global implementation of the third SAGES Fundamentals Program FUSE. The written documentation of the making of FUSE is an important contribution to the history and mission of SAGES and allows the reader to understand the idea, concept, realization, and implementation of the only free online educational tool for physicians on energy devices available today. FUSE is the culmination of the SAGES efforts to recognize gaps in patient safety and develop state-of-the-art educational programs to address those gaps. It is the goal of the FUSE task force to ensure that general FUSE implementation becomes multinational, involving as many countries as possible.

Barriers to implementation of the FUSE program.

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) developed The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) Program to promote safe use of energy devices in the operating room and endoscopy suite. Utilization of the program has been slower than anticipated. This study aims to determine the barriers to implementing FUSE. An anonymous survey was distributed to a surgery department at an academic teaching hospital (n=256). Participants indicated their level of training. Answers were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. There were 94 (36.7%) respondents to the survey from September 7 to 20, 2016. Fifteen surveys were incomplete, leaving 79 responses for analysis. Most respondents were at the faculty level (45/79, 57.0%). The majority had heard of FUSE (62/79, 78.5%), but only 19 had completed the certification (19/62, 32.3%). There was no difference in the completion rate between faculty and trainees (26.7 vs. 20.6%, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.49-4.06, p=0.53). The most common reasons for not taking the exam were lack of time to study (26/43, 60.5%) and lack of time to take the exam (28/43, 62.1%); however, cost was not a barrier (12/43, 27.9%). The majority identified a personal learning gap regarding the safe use of surgical energy (30/43, 69.7%). Of the 19 FUSE-certified respondents, reasons cited for completing the exam included wanting to prevent adverse events to patients and in the operating room (17/19, 89.5% and 17/19, 89.5%), and the belief that the course would make them a safer surgeon (16/19, 84.2%). FUSE teaches the proper use of radiofrequency energy, how to prevent unnecessary injury, and promotes safe practice. Close to three out of every four surgeons self-identified a personal knowledge gap regarding the safe use of surgical energy. Time restraints were cited most commonly as the barrier to starting and completing FUSE. Integrating the FUSE program into resident educational conferences, faculty grand rounds, or national conferences may help improve participation and drive adoption of FUSE certification.

Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE): An Essential Educational Program for Operating Room Safety

Operating room (OR) safety has become a major concern in patient safety since the 1990s. Improvement of team communication and behavior is a popular target for safety programming at the institutional level. Despite these efforts, essential safety gaps remain in the OR and procedure rooms. A prime example is the use of energy-based devices in ORs and procedural areas. The lack of fundamental understanding of energy device function, design, and application contributes to avoidable injury and harm at a rate of approximately 1 to 2 per 1000 patients in the US. Hundreds of OR fires occur each year in the US, some causing severe injury and even death. Most of these fires are associated with the use of energy-based surgical devices.In response to this safety issue, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) developed the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program. This program includes a standardized curriculum targeted to surgeons, other physicians, and allied health care professionals and a psychometrically designed and validated certification test. A successful FUSE certification documents acquisition of the basic knowledge needed to safely use energy-based devices in the OR. By design FUSE fills a void in the curriculum and competency assessment for surgeons and other procedural specialists in the use of energy-based devices in patients.

Increased use of surgical energy promotes methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in rabbits following open ventral hernia mesh repair.

Surgical energy has been widely implemented because of ease of use, effective hemostasis, and surgical dissection. Studies demonstrate its use to be an independent risk factor for postoperative wound infection. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most common bacteria found in postoperative mesh infection. No reports are available on the sequelae of surgical energy use for open ventral hernia repair (oVHR) with mesh. We hypothesized that increasing amounts of surgical energy will result in higher infectious burden after oVHR with composite multifilament polyester mesh (Parietex™ PCO). New Zealand rabbits underwent bridging oVHR with Parietex™ PCO and were divided into three surgical treatment groups: (1) scalpel alone, (2) 120J of energy, and (3) 600J of energy. The bioprosthesis was then inoculated with 105 colony-forming units of MRSA. Rabbits were survived for 7 days with daily physical examination. Complete blood count, basci metabolic panel, and blood cultures were performed on postoperative days one, four, and seven. Surviving rabbits were killed, and meshes explanted for MRSA colony counts. Rabbits receiving the most surgical energy developed signs and symptoms of severe sepsis and wound necrosis within 24h. In comparison, rabbits receiving no surgical energy had significantly less MRSA recovered from explanted mesh, significantly less bacteremia, and fewer adhesions. Increased use of surgical energy promoted greater colonization, exaggerated septic response to bacterial contamination, and more severe adhesions. In the absence of devitalized tissue, rabbits can effectively limit bacterial contamination. These findings support the surgical principles of proper tissue handling and highlight the detrimental effects of indiscriminant surgical energy usage, thus emphasizing the importance of programs such as Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy.

What Is Your Energy IQ? FUSE: Bridging a Patient Safety Gap

AORN JournalVolume 103, Issue 3 p. 333-337 Column What Is Your Energy IQ? FUSE: Bridging a Patient Safety Gap Brenda C. Ulmer RN, MN, CNOR, Brenda C. Ulmer RN, MN, CNORSearch for more papers by this author Brenda C. Ulmer RN, MN, CNOR, Brenda C. Ulmer RN, MN, CNORSearch for more papers by this author First published: 26 February 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2016.01.003Citations: 2 Editor's note: Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) is a trademark of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Los Angeles, CA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume103, Issue3March 2016Pages 333-337 RelatedInformation

Review of “Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. [email protected] Received 16 June, 2015 Accepted 13 August, 2015 Financial disclosures/commercial associations: Stryker Corporation (Hollier—consultant). The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) certification: validation and predictors of success.

The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program includes a Web-based didactic curriculum and a high-stakes multiple-choice question examination with the goal to provide certification of knowledge on the safe use of surgical energy-based devices. The purpose of this study was (1) to set a passing score through a psychometrically sound process and (2) to determine what pretest factors predicted passing the FUSE examination. Beta-testing of multiple-choice questions on 62 topics of importance to the safe use of surgical energy-based devices was performed. Eligible test takers were physicians with a minimum of 1 year of surgical training who were recruited by FUSE task force members. A pretest survey collected baseline information. A total of 227 individuals completed the FUSE beta-test, and 208 completed the pretest survey. The passing/cut score for the first test form of the FUSE multiple-choice examination was determined using the modified Angoff methodology and for the second test form was determined using a linear equating methodology. The overall passing rate across the two examination forms was 81.5%. Self-reported time studying the FUSE Web-based curriculum for a minimum of >2 h was associated with a passing examination score (p < 0.001). Performance was not different based on increased years of surgical practice (p = 0.363), self-reported expertise on one or more types of energy-based devices (p = 0.683), participation in the FUSE postgraduate course (p = 0.426), or having reviewed the FUSE manual (p = 0.428). Logistic regression found that studying the FUSE didactics for >2 h predicted a passing score (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.44-9.05; p = 0.006) independent of the other baseline characteristics recorded. The development of the FUSE examination, including the passing score, followed a psychometrically sound process. Self-reported time studying the FUSE curriculum predicted a passing score independent of other pretest characteristics such as years in practice and self-reported expertise.

Biomolecular inflammatory response to surgical energy usage in laparoscopic surgery: results of a randomized study.

Use of surgical energy is integral to laparoscopic surgery (LS). Energized dissection (ED) has a potential to impact the biomolecular expression of inflammation due to ED-induced collateral inflammation. We did this triple-blind randomized controlled (RCT) study to assess this biomolecular footprint in an index LS, i.e., laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This RCT was conducted in collaboration with tertiary-level institutions, from January 2014 to December 2014 with institutional review board clearance. Consecutive, unselected, consenting candidates for LC were randomized (after anesthesia induction) into group I (ED) and group II (non-ED). They were managed with compliance to universal protocols for ethics, informed consent, anesthesia, drug usage and clinical pathway with blinded observers. Biomolecular inflammatory markers, i.e., interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and highly sensitive CRP (HS-CRP), were measured with blood drawn juxta-preoperatively (H0), at 4h (H4) and at 24h (H24). The quantitative changes induced by ED on IL-6, TNF-α and HS-CRP at H0, H4 and H24 with their kinetic behavior were the study endpoint. Prospective data were analyzed statistically with a p value of <0.05 being significant. Two cases from the ED group had biliary injury and hence were withdrawn from analysis. The ED (n=49) and non-ED (n=51) groups had similar demographic, clinical and H0 biomolecular variables. There was a significant increase in IL-6, TNF-α and HS-CRP from H0 to H4 in both the groups (p values <0.001). From H4 to H24, all three cytokines showed significant increase in ED group (p<0.05), whereas in the non-ED group, IL-6 showed significant fall (p=0.004) and TNF-α showed no significant change (p=0.063). Both the groups showed H4-H24 elevation of HS-CRP (p=0.000). Energized dissection adds to the cytokine-mediated postoperative inflammation. The additional ED-induced inflammation can be measured objectively by IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Clinical Trials Registry, India (REF/2014/06/007153).

Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE): Closing a Gap in Medical Education.

Traditional medical education curricula for students, residents and trainees do not address the rapidly growing number of technological devices that are fundamentally changing health care delivery today. This is most relevant in those medical specialties that rely heavily on the use of advanced technologies and devices, for example minimally invasive surgery, interventional radiology, gastroenterology, cardiology and anesthesia. Health care professionals in these domains are increasingly sharing procedures that use energy devices of many different designs and functionality without training in their fundamental use and safety. This exposes both operators and patients to increasing risk for injury. The definitive gap in adequate education and training in new technologies prompted the development of The Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE) program by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, nurses, educators and engineers under the leadership of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). The sweeping changes in the surgical and interventional professions due to technological innovation call for the development of additional curricula to close the educational gap on other medically important technologies. The FUSE program and future educational curricula on medical technologies are fundamental to patient care and represent a necessary paradigm shift in traditional medical education.