Use Of Drugs For Secondary Prevention Research Articles

Epidemiology of First and Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Sweden 2010–2019: A Riksstroke Study

Introduction: Ischemic stroke incidence appears to have decreased during the last decades, but most studies focus on the first-ever events and epidemiological data on recurrent stroke are scarce. The aim of our study was to investigate trends in incidence, risk factors, and medication in patients with first-ever and recurrent ischemic stroke between 2010 and 2019 in Sweden. Methods: We included patients (≥18 years old) with ischemic stroke registered in the hospital-based Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke) 2010–2019. The coverage of Riksstroke was consistently high (about 90%) during this period. Data were stratified by first-ever and recurrent ischemic stroke in three different time periods (2010–2012, 2013–2016, and 2017–2019) and shown as crude and age-specific incidence rates per 100,000 person-years. Statistics Sweden provided census data on the Swedish population in different age groups. Results: During the study period, 201,316 cases of ischemic stroke were registered in Riksstroke, including 153,865 (76.4%) cases of first-ever ischemic stroke and 46,248 (23.0%) cases of recurrent ischemic stroke (0.6% of cases unclassified). The crude incidence of first-ever ischemic stroke decreased by 17% from 216 (95% CI 214–218) to 179 (95% CI 177–181) between 2010–2012 and 2017–2019, whereas recurrent ischemic stroke decreased by 33% from 72 (95% CI 71–73) to 48 (95% CI 47–49). Between these time periods, diminishing ischemic stroke incidence was seen in all age groups with highest decline noted in those aged 75–84 years (928 [95% CI 914–943] to 698 [95% CI 686–709]; −25% in first-ever ischemic stroke and 361 [95% CI 351–370] to 219 [95% CI 213–226]; −39% in recurrent ischemic stroke) and ≥85 years (1,674 [95% CI 1,645–1,703] to 1,295 [95% CI 1,270–1,320]; −23% in first-ever ischemic stroke and 683 [95% CI 664–702] to 423 [95% CI 409–437]; −38% in recurrent ischemic stroke). Treatment with anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and lipid-lowering drugs increased considerably in patients with first-ever and recurrent ischemic stroke both at admission and discharge during the study period. Conclusion: Whereas both first-ever and recurrent ischemic stroke rates declined in Sweden between 2010 and 2019, the proportional decline was almost double for recurrent ischemic stroke than for first-ever ischemic stroke and most pronounced in the elderly. Increased use of secondary preventive drugs, in particular anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation, appears to have contributed, but further studies on precise causes for the decline in recurrent ischemic stroke are needed.

Secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in China

ObjectiveWe aimed to estimate the current use of secondary prevention drugs and identify its associated individual characteristics among those with established cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in the communities of China.MethodsWe studied...

P834Secondary prevention medications of cardiovascular diseases in China: findings from China PEACE million persons project

Abstract Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is the leading cause of death in China. Secondary prevention medications can improve the prognosis of CVD, yet little is known about the current use, variation and associated factors of these therapies in China. Purpose The aim of this study was to describe the current use of secondary prevention medications among patients with established CVD in the community setting in China, assess variations across population subgroups, and identify the individual characteristics associated with these therapies. Methods We studied 2.6 million participants aged 35–75 years from all 31 provinces in the China Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events (PEACE) Million Persons Project, a government-funded public health program conducted from 2014 to 2018. Participants self-reported their history of ischemic heart disease (IHD) or ischemic stroke (IS) and medication use in an interview. Among participants with IHD and/or IS, we assessed the reported use of secondary prevention medications (anti-platelet drugs and statins) in the overall population and in 1,530,408 population subgroups, defined by all possible combinations of 16 factors (age, sex, urbanity, geographic region, ethnicity, occupation, annual household income, education, marital status, medical insurance, current smoker, current drinker, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, body mass index and years since diagnosis). Multivariable mixed models with a logit link function and community-specific random intercepts were fitted to assess the associations of demographic, socioeconomic and health behavior factors with the reported use of secondary prevention mediations. Results Among 2,613,035 screened participants, 2.9% (74,830) had history of IHD and/or IS (1.2% for IHD, 2.4% for IS). Overall, the reported use rate either anti-platelet drugs or statins was 21.9% (18.3% anti-platelet drugs, 11.0% statins, and 7.4% both). Among the 1,530,408 population subgroups, the use of secondary prevention medications varied substantially (3.4% to 52.0%). Multivariable analyses found that that younger people, women, those living in rural areas, current smokers, current drinkers, people without hypertension or diabetes, and those with established CVD for more than 2 years were less likely to take anti-platelet drugs or statins (Figure). Forest plot of multivariable mixed model Conclusions The current use of secondary prevention drugs is suboptimal and varies substantially across population subgroups in China. Our study identifies target populations for interventions to improve secondary prevention of CVD. Acknowledgement/Funding This study was supported by the Ministry of Finance of China and National Health Commission of China

Cost-effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination pill for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in China, India, Mexico, Nigeria, and South Africa: a modelling study

Fewer than 25% of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in countries of low and middle income (LMICs) use guideline-directed drugs for secondary prevention. A fixed-dose combination polypill might improve cardiovascular outcomes by increasing prescription rates and adherence, but the cost-effectiveness of this approach is uncertain. We developed microsimulation models to assess the cost-effectiveness of a polypill containing aspirin, lisinopril, atenolol, and simvastatin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared with current care in China, India, Mexico, Nigeria, and South Africa. We modelled baseline use of secondary prevention drugs on the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological study. In the intervention arm, we assumed that patients currently prescribed any prevention drug for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease would receive the polypill instead, which would improve adherence by 32% (from a meta-analysis of two randomised trials in LMICs). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of the polypill at prices in the public sector and on the retail market. Key outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) over a 5-year period and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from the perspective of the health-care sector and a lifetime analytical horizon. We assumed a cost-effectiveness threshold equal to each country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted. In sensitivity analyses, we examined the population health effect achievable by increasing the uptake of the polypill in the eligible population. Among adults aged 30-84 years with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, adoption of the polypill for secondary prevention compared with current care was projected to avert 40-54 major adverse cardiovascular events for every 1000 patients treated for 5 years and produce between three and ten additional serious adverse events. Assuming public-sector pharmaceutical prices, the ICER of the polypill compared with current care over a lifetime analytical horizon was Int$168 (95% UI 55 to 337) per DALY averted in China, $154 (57 to 289) in India, $88 (15 to 193) in Mexico, $364 (147 to 692) in Nigeria, and $64 (cost-saving to 203) in South Africa, amounting to 0·4-6·2% of the per capita GDP in these countries. The ICER of the polypill compared with current care increased to 3·3-14·6% of the per capita GDP at retail market pharmaceutical prices. Use of the polypill at current rates of prescription of secondary prevention drugs would produce modest health benefits, reducing DALYs from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among patients with established disease by 3·1-10·1% over 10 years. Increasing use to 50% or 75% of the eligible population would produce substantially larger health gains (up to 24·3% atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease DALYs averted). The polypill is projected to be cost-effective compared with current care for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in China, India, Mexico, Nigeria, and South Africa, particularly if it is made available at public-sector pricing. However, achieving meaningful improvements in cardiovascular health will require simultaneous investments in health infrastructure to increase the uptake of the polypill among patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Richard A and Susan F Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Hellman Family Foundation, Department of Veterans Affairs, and University of California at San Francisco.

Long-term outcomes and secondary prevention after acute coronary events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

ObjectivesPatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and suffer from poorer short-term outcomes after ACS. The aims of this study were to assess...

Associations between Ischemic Stroke Follow-Up, Socioeconomic Status, and Adherence to Secondary Preventive Drugs in Southern Sweden: Observations from the Swedish Stroke Register (Riksstroke)

Background: Currently, the knowledge that one has on adequate stroke follow-up practices is limited. We report associations between 90-day stroke follow-up, socio-economy and adherence to secondary prevention in southern Sweden. Methods: Data on 5,602 patients with ischemic stroke January 1, 2008-December 31, 2010, were obtained from Riksstroke and linked to official registers for information on education, birth country, doctor's follow-ups, and secondary prevention. Primary adherence at 4 months and persistence at 14 months post-stroke were calculated for warfarin, statins, antihypertensive, and antiplatelet drugs. Results: The 90-day follow-up rate was 75%. Patients not receiving a 90-day follow-up had lower age-adjusted OR of persistent drug use at 14 months for antihypertensive agents (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91) and for antiplatelet drugs (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87). Drug adherence rates 14 months post-stroke were 85% for antiplatelet drugs, 69% for warfarin, 88% for antihypertensive agents, and 76% for statins. One in three patients discontinued using one or more drug class within 14 months, and nonadherence was associated with activities of daily living dependency at 3 months (age-adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.57-0.69), but not with age, gender, or educational status. Conclusions: The use of secondary preventive drugs decreases over the first year after stroke and remains suboptimal. Specific reasons for nonadherence warrant further study.

Initiation of and long-term adherence to secondary preventive drugs after acute myocardial infarction.

BackgroundSecondary preventive drug therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is recommended to reduce the risk of new cardiovascular events. The aim of this nationwide cohort study was to examine the initiation and long-term use of secondary preventive drugs after AMI.MethodsThe prescription of drugs in 42,707 patients < 85 years discharged alive from hospital after AMI in 2009–2013 was retrieved by linkage of the Norwegian Patient Register, the Norwegian Prescription Database, and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Patients were followed for up to 24 months.ResultsThe majority of patients were discharged on single or dual antiplatelet therapy (91 %), statins (90 %), beta-blockers (82 %), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor II blockers (ARB) (60 %). Patients not undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (42 %) were less likely to be prescribed secondary preventive drugs compared with patients undergoing PCI. This was particular the case for dual antiplatelet therapy (43 % vs. 87 %). The adherence to prescribed drugs was high: 12 months after index AMI, 84 % of patients were still on aspirin, 84 % on statins, 77 % on beta-blockers and 57 % on ACEI/ARB. Few drug and dose adjustments were made during follow-up.ConclusionGuideline-recommended secondary preventive drugs were prescribed to most patients discharged from hospital after AMI, but the percentage receiving such therapy was significantly lower in non-PCI patients. The long-time adherence was high, but few drug adjustments were performed during follow-up. More attention is needed to secondary preventive drug therapy in AMI patients not undergoing PCI.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0283-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

S107 Explaining The Mortality Gap In Copd Patients After Myocardial Infarction: Data From The Uk Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (minap)

Introduction COPD patients are at increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and have increased mortality after an MI. Although some of this increased risk may be due to COPD itself, differences in management after an MI may play a role.1 We therefore investigated whether the increased in-hospital and 180 day mortality for COPD patients could be explained by differences in in-hospital and discharge treatment. Methods Patients with a first MI between 2003–2013 were identified from the UK MINAP database. COPD patients had a record of obstructive airway disease, smoking history and were aged >35 years. Logistic regression was used to compare mortality in-hospital and at 180 days post-discharge between COPD and non-COPD patients. All models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking, previous cardiovascular disease, renal failure, diabetes and cardiovascular drugs used on admission. Variables relating to in-hospital management (delay in diagnosis, use of reperfusion and time to reperfusion/use of angiography in-hospital) and use of secondary prevention on discharge were then sequentially added to models to assess the extent to which they explained the mortality difference. Results 300,146 patients with a first MI were identified. 34,027 (11.3%) had COPD. In-hospital mortality was greater for COPD patients after a STEMI (see [Table 1][1]), this difference was reduced after adjusting for in-hospital factors. Mortality was also greater for COPD patients at 180 days; this was not reduced after adjustment for in-hospital factors, but was reduced after adjusting for use of secondary prevention. In-hospital mortality was also greater for COPD patients after a non-STEMI, this was reduced after adjusting for in-hospital factors. Mortality at 180-days after a non-STEMI was greater for COPD patients, this was reduced after adjusting for in-hospital factors, but not after adjusting for use of secondary prevention. Conclusions Improved recognition and timely use of reperfusion treatments after a STEMI may significantly reduce the in-hospital mortality for COPD patients. Longer term mortality in COPD patients after a STEMI may be improved by increased use of secondary prevention drugs. Increased use of timely angiography may improve mortality for COPD patients after a non-STEMI. Reference 1. Quint, JK et al . BMJ . 2013;347:f6650 View this table: Abstract S107 Table 1 Differences in mortality after an MI between COPD and non-COPD patients. All odds ratios compare COPD to non-COPD patients [1]: #T1

THU0067 Use of cardiovascular drugs in patients with RA, overall and in patients with a history of acute ischemic cardiac events

BackgroundData on increased cardiovascular disease (CV) risks in RA are abundant. Less is known about the use of therapeutic or prophylactic CV management in RA. Some studies report a lower...

Few sex differences in the use of drugs for secondary prevention after stroke: a nationwide observational study

This observational study describes the sex differences in the use of secondary preventive drugs after ischemic stroke in terms of prescribing and persistence. Also, sex differences in patient- and treatment-related factors associated with drug use were investigated. In this nationwide register-based study, the Swedish Stroke Register was linked to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register for information on drugs prescribed for, and bought by, stroke patients. Background factors were included from the Swedish Stroke Register. Included in the database were 9331 men and 9018 women. Men were more often prescribed statins, 48.8% versus 38.1% [age-adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.82-0.91], and warfarin, 38.4% versus 26.4% after stroke (age-adjusted PR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.79-0.97). There were no differences in prescribing of antihypertensive or antiplatelet drugs. No sex differences were seen regarding not continuing drug treatment after discharge (primary non-adherence). Women had slightly higher persistence to antihypertensive treatment 2 years after discharge, 76.3% versus 71.9% for men (age-adjusted PR = 1.05, 95%CI = 1.00-1.09), but there were no differences in persistence to antiplatelet, warfarin or statin treatments. Similar factors were related to statin and warfarin prescribing for both men and women. Only antihypertensive treatment before stroke was associated to persistence to antihypertensive treatment, and this increased persistence for both men and women. This study showed few differences between men and women after stroke. Patients' use of secondary preventive drugs needs to be improved, and from a public health perspective, poor persistence is probably a greater problem than differences between the sexes.

Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey

Although most cardiovascular disease occurs in low-income and middle-income countries, little is known about the use of effective secondary prevention medications in these communities. We aimed to assess use of proven effective secondary preventive drugs (antiplatelet drugs, β blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers [ARBs], and statins) in individuals with a history of coronary heart disease or stroke. In the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study, we recruited individuals aged 35-70 years from rural and urban communities in countries at various stages of economic development. We assessed rates of previous cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease or stroke) and use of proven effective secondary preventive drugs and blood-pressure-lowering drugs with standardised questionnaires, which were completed by telephone interviews, household visits, or on patient's presentation to clinics. We report estimates of drug use at national, community, and individual levels. We enrolled 153,996 adults from 628 urban and rural communities in countries with incomes classified as high (three countries), upper-middle (seven), lower-middle (three), or low (four) between January, 2003, and December, 2009. 5650 participants had a self-reported coronary heart disease event (median 5·0 years previously [IQR 2·0-10·0]) and 2292 had stroke (4·0 years previously [2·0-8·0]). Overall, few individuals with cardiovascular disease took antiplatelet drugs (25·3%), β blockers (17·4%), ACE inhibitors or ARBs (19·5%), or statins (14·6%). Use was highest in high-income countries (antiplatelet drugs 62·0%, β blockers 40·0%, ACE inhibitors or ARBs 49·8%, and statins 66·5%), lowest in low-income countries (8·8%, 9·7%, 5·2%, and 3·3%, respectively), and decreased in line with reduction of country economic status (p(trend)<0·0001 for every drug type). Fewest patients received no drugs in high-income countries (11·2%), compared with 45·1% in upper middle-income countries, 69·3% in lower middle-income countries, and 80·2% in low-income countries. Drug use was higher in urban than rural areas (antiplatelet drugs 28·7% urban vs 21·3% rural, β blockers 23·5%vs 15·6%, ACE inhibitors or ARBs 22·8%vs 15·5%, and statins 19·9%vs 11·6%; all p<0·0001), with greatest variation in poorest countries (p(interaction)<0·0001 for urban vs rural differences by country economic status). Country-level factors (eg, economic status) affected rates of drug use more than did individual-level factors (eg, age, sex, education, smoking status, body-mass index, and hypertension and diabetes statuses). Because use of secondary prevention medications is low worldwide-especially in low-income countries and rural areas-systematic approaches are needed to improve the long-term use of basic, inexpensive, and effective drugs. Full funding sources listed at end of paper (see Acknowledgments).

Persistent Use of Secondary Preventive Drugs Declines Rapidly During the First 2 Years After Stroke

To prevent new cardiovascular events after stroke, prescribed preventive drugs should be used continuously. This study measures persistent use of preventive drugs after stroke and identifies factors associated with persistence. A 1-year cohort (21,077 survivors) from Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register, was linked to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. The proportion of patients who were persistent users of drugs prescribed at discharge from hospital declined progressively over the first 2 years to reach 74.2% for antihypertensive drugs, 56.1% for statins, 63.7% for antiplatelet drugs, and 45.0% for warfarin. For most drugs, advanced age, comorbidity, good self-perceived health, absence of low mood, acute treatment in a stroke unit, and institutional living at follow-up were independently associated with persistent medication use. Persistent secondary prevention treatment declines rapidly during the first 2 years after stroke, particularly for statins and warfarin. Effective interventions to improve persistent secondary prevention after stroke need to be developed.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Potential for Significant Socio-Economic Burden from Adverse Events Due to Poor Cholesterol Control at Review 3 Years Later

Conclusion: Suboptimal use of secondary prevention drugs in high risk ACS patients treatedwith urgent CABG surgery may contribute to subsequent adverse events. Greater efforts to optimise the use of these medications are still needed in 2010. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2010.06.711

Funnel plots, performance variation and the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project 2003–2004

BackgroundClinical governance requires health care professionals to improve standards of care and has resulted in comparison of clinical performance data. The Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (a UK cardiology dataset) tabulates its performance. However funnel plots are the display method of choice for institutional comparison. We aimed to demonstrate that funnel plots may be derived from MINAP data and allow more meaningful interpretation of data.MethodsWe examined the attainment of National Service Framework standards for all hospitals (n = 230) and all patients (n = 99,133) in the MINAP database between 1st April 2003 and 31st March 2004. We generated funnel plots (with control limits at 3 sigma) of Door to Needle and Call to Needle thrombolysis times, and the use of aspirin, beta-blockers and statins post myocardial infarction.ResultsOnly 87,427 patients fulfilled criteria for analysis of the use of secondary prevention drugs and 15,111 patients for analysis by Door to Needle and Call to Needle times (163 hospitals achieved the standards for Door to Needle times and 215 were within or above their control limits). One hundred and sixteen hospitals fell outside the 'within 25%' and 'more than 25%' standards for Call to Needle times, but 28 were below the lower control limits. Sixteen hospitals failed to reach the standards for aspirin usage post AMI and 24 remained below the lower control limits. Thirty hospitals were below the lower CL for beta-blocker usage and 49 outside the standard. Statin use was comparable.ConclusionFunnel plots may be applied to a complex dataset and allow visual comparison of data derived from multiple health-care units. Variation is readily identified permitting units to appraise their practices so that effective quality improvement may take place.