Use Of Regional Anesthesia Research Articles

Instrument to evaluate the perception of abuse and/or disrespectful treatment during childbirth: A validation study

AimTo design and validate a tool to assess a woman's perception of whether she has experienced a situation of abuse or disrespect during childbirth attendance: “Childbirth Abuse and Respect Evaluation-Maternal Questionnaire” (CARE-MQ). MethodsMultidisciplinary panel of experts (gynecologists, midwives, mothers) participated in creating CARE-MQ. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 901 Spanish women who had given birth between 1 and 3 months before to determine psychometric characteristics. Finally, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a convergent validity study were carried out with the Quality Questionnaire from the Patient's Perspective-Intrapartum (QPP-I), and a reliability study using internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and coefficient of intraclass correlation (CCI). FindingsThe KMO test gave a value of 0.935, and Bartlett's sphericity test was <0.001. The EFA identified four components (“Emotional Abuse”, “Inadequate Professionalism”, “Physical Abuse” y “Lost contact”) that explained 55.16 % of variance. In the CFA, a good fit was observed for most of the evaluated indicators. CARE-MQ correlated negatively with QPP-I (Spearman's rho = −0.641, 95 % CI: −0.679, −0.600; p < 0.001) and was statistically associated with variables related to childbirth experience (p < 0.005) such as the use of a birth plan, use of regional analgesia, type of birth, episiotomy, presence of severe tears, skin-to-skin contact, length of hospital stay and postpartum surgical intervention. Cronbach's α value was 0.903. The ICC of absolute agreement after administering the questionnaire one week after was 0.927 (95 % CI: 0.85–0.97). ConclusionsCARE-MQ is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the perception of a woman regarding the situation of abuse and/or disrespect that she may have experienced during birth in a population of Spanish postpartum women.

Erector spinae plane block as a component of intensive care for acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Analgesia is crucial in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis, which includes the increased use of regional analgesia. In recent years, less-invasive and safer methods of pain relief, particularly erector spinae plane block (ESP-block), has drawn attention from the anesthesiological community. However, studies on its use in acute pancreatitis are rare. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to make a clinical evaluation of bilateral erector spinae plane block in patients with acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pilot prospective randomized study was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=7), ESP blockade was used, and group 2 (n=12), epidural analgesia (EA) was used. The primary points were considered to be an assessment of pain syndrome intensity and the need for analgesics. Additional results were liver and kidney function, acid-base condition, inflammatory response level, and the time of onset of peristalsis. RESULTS: The decrease in pain intensity in both groups was unidirectional: after 8 h, it was 3.57±1.98 points to the NRS in group 1 and 2.91±1.97 points to the NRS in group 2, and after 24 h, it was 1.42±1.27 and 1.75±2.3 points to the NRS, respectively. No significant difference was found in pain intensity between the groups (р 0,05). The average consumption of ketorolac was 78.2±16.3 mg in group 2 — 63.28±17.23 mg for 1 patient. The average need for narcotic analgesics, that is, morphine, per patient was 22±8 mg in group 1 and 36.3±17.2 mg in group 2 (р 0,05). During the therapy, blood α-amylase, diuresis rate, creatinine level, and glomerular filtration rate did not have a significant difference between the groups, as well as pH, BE, and blood lactate levels (р 0,05). Peristalsis was noted after 12.49±19.73 h in the ESP-block group and after 16.9±21.3 h in the 2nd group (р 0,05). The ICU length of stay between the groups did not differ and was 62±3 and 62±7 h, respectively (р 0,05). CONCLUSION: Bilateral erector spinae plane block is a simple and safe method that induces analgesic effect and effect on homeostasis in acute pancreatitis, similar to epidural blockade. Further study of the role and location of erector spinae plane block in treating pain in acute pancreatitis is required.

Comparative evaluation of two methods of prolonged femoral nerve block using an elastomeric pump after knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: The number of knee arthroplasty (KA) surgeries is increasing annually. These surgeries are associated with severe pain. The optimal method of choice in perioperative analgesia in these patients remains controversial. The use of regional analgesia, including prolonged analgesia, allows for high pain relief and increased patient satisfaction. Modern elastomeric pumps (EP) provide prolonged conduction analgesia, which significantly expands the possibilities of perioperative pain relief. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of prolonged femoral nerve block using EP with and without bolus after KA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized study included 75 patients who were divided into two clinical groups: group 1 (n=36), patients who received prolonged regional analgesia using EP with controlled injection without bolus, and group 2 (n=39), patients who received prolonged regional analgesia using EP with bolus. In the postoperative period, the level of pain at rest and during movement was assessed after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours as well as the need for opioid analgesics, consumption of local anesthetic for various options of continued regional analgesia, quadriceps femoris muscle function, and distance traveled by patients after surgery in the first 2 days. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in pain level at rest and during movement in the observation period between the groups (p=0.213). No additional prescription of opioid analgesics was required. Local anesthetic consumption was lower in group 2 (group 1.384±33.4 ml; group 2.237±25.1 ml; p=0.031). Patients in group 2 had greater activity in knee extension and, thus, greater distance traveled after surgery. CONCLUSION: The use of EP with a bolus has been demonstrated to provide adequate levels of analgesia and better functional recovery in patients with bolus after KA than in patients without bolus. This technique is recommended as a component of enhanced recovery program after surgery.

Pain management in cancer surgery: Global inequities and strategies to address them.

Among patients undergoing surgical oncologic operations, patients in low- and middle-income countries are at particularly high risk for inadequate perioperative analgesia. This article reviews some of the guiding pillars of pain management for cancer surgery, including use of regional analgesia and acute pain service consultation, multimodal adjunctive analgesia, and judicious opioid use while presenting data on international disparities for each pillar and proposing strategies to address these inequities.

Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial

Planned 6- vs 12-hour placement of the double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in labor induction hastens delivery. The Foley catheter is low-priced and typically performs at least as well as the proprietary double-balloon devices in labor induction. Maternal satisfaction with labor induction is usually inversely related to the speed of the process. This study aimed to compare Foley balloon placement for 6 vs 12 hours in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January to October of 2022. Eligible multiparous women admitted for induction of labor for various indications were enrolled. Participant inclusion criteria were multiparity (at least 1 previous vaginal delivery of ≥24 weeks' gestation), age ≥18 years, term pregnancy >37 weeks' gestation, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, normal fetal heart rate tracing, no significant contractions (< 2 in 10 minutes), and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6). Participants were randomized after successful Foley balloon insertion for the balloon to be left in place for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before removal to check cervical suitability for amniotomy. The primary outcomes were the induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction with the allocated intervention assessed using a visual numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were derived in part from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). Maternal outcomes were change in first Bishop score after intervention, use of additional method for cervical ripening, time to delivery after balloon removal, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean delivery, duration of oxytocin infusion, blood loss during delivery, presence of third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal infection, use of regional analgesia in labor, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, cardiorespiratory arrest, and need for hysterectomy. The secondary neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, cord blood pH, neonatal sepsis, birthweight, birth trauma, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or need for therapeutic hypothermia. Analyses were conducted with the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. A total of 220 women were randomized (110 to each intervention). Regarding the 2 primary outcomes, the induction-to-delivery intervals were a median (interquartile range) of 15.9 (12.0-24.0) and 21.6 (17.3-26.0) hours (P<.001), and maternal satisfaction scores were 7 (6-8) and 7 (6-8) (P=.734) for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively. The following rates were observed for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively: sequential use of additional cervical ripening agent (Foley reinsertion)-29 per 110 (26.4%) and 13 per 110 (11.8%) (relative risk, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-4.10; P=.006); spontaneous balloon expulsion-22 per 110 (20.0%) and 37 per 110 (33.6%) (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.94; P=.022); and recommendation of the allocated intervention to a friend-61 per 110 (73.6%) and 87 per 110 (79.1%) (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.08; P=.341). Other secondary outcomes, including cesarean delivery, were not significantly different. Foley balloon placement for 6 hours for cervical ripening in parous women hastens birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction relative to 12-hour placement. Foley reinsertion for additional ripening was more frequent in the 6-hour group.

Health disparities in regional anesthesia and analgesia for the management of acute pain in trauma patients.

Health disparities in regional anesthesia and analgesia for the management of acute pain in trauma patients.

Use of regional analgesia to prevent the conversion from acute to chronic pain.

Chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) prevalence has not changed over the past decades what questions the efficacy of preventive strategies. Regional analgesia is used to control acute pain, but preventive effect on CPSP remains debated. Failures and future application of regional analgesia to prevent transition from acute to chronic pain will be discussed. After thoracotomy, perioperative regional analgesia does not seem to prevent CPSP. After breast cancer surgery, paravertebral block might prevent CPSP intensity and impact on daily life up to 12 months, particularly in high catastrophizing patients. In knee arthroplasty, perioperative regional analgesia or preoperative genicular nerve neuroablation do not prevent CPSP, although current studies present several bias. The protective role of effective regional analgesia and early pain relief in trauma patients deserves further studies. Regional analgesia failure to prevent CPSP development should prompt us to reconsider its perioperative utilization. Patients' stratification, for example high-pain responders, might help to target those who will most benefit of regional analgesia. The impact of regional analgesia on secondary pain-related outcomes such as intensity and neuropathic character despite no difference on CPSP incidence requires more studies. Finally, the preventive effect of regional analgesia targeted interventions on CPSP in patients suffering from severe subacute pain deserves to be assessed.

Biologic, Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Acute Postsurgical Pain in Racially Diverse Pediatric Cohorts Undergoing Major Surgery

Despite postoperative pain being a predictor for chronic postsurgical pain, postoperative pain remains undertreated in children. Pediatric studies examining disparities in acute pain outcomes are mostly limited to ambulatory surgeries. We evaluated risk for severe post-surgical pain after major surgeries in children. In Cohort 1 (retrospective, N=2788; 5 surgeries) and Cohort 2 (Prospective; N=360; spine/pectus surgery), surgical, pain, opioid use, analgesia, demographics, Area deprivation index (ADI) data were analyzed for association with outcomes sing Wilcoxon/Chi-square tests and linear regression Outcomes: Pain score AUC and opioid use on postoperative days 0-2, regional analgesia. Compositional analysis was conducted for %AUC for pain score<4, 4-7, and >7/10 using Aitchison compositional scale. Genotyping and association of 355 variants (21 genes in HPA/immune pathways) were studied (cohort 2). Cohort 1: Pain AUC was associated with age (p=0.002), sex (p=0.004), surgery (p<0.001). ADI was higher in African Americans (AA) (p<0.001). Opioid use was higher for abdominal surgery, lower with age and regional use. Pain AUC and opioid use were not different between races, though NRS AUC% for severe pain (POD2) and use of regional analgesia was higher in Whites (p<0.001). FLACC and NRS were negatively correlated in AA but not Whites. Cohort 2: AUC POD0-2 was higher among Whites compared to AA (p=0.002). Female sex (p=0.006), White race (p=0.026), surgery type (p=0.001), age (p<0.001), weight (p<0.001) and preoperative pain (p<0.001) were associated with AUC. 9 SNPs from stress genes: ANXA2, CRHR2, FKBP5, IGF2, MC2R were associated with AUC (p<0.05). Both cohorts showed associations for age, sex, race, preoperative pain and surgery type with acute post-surgical pain. Underlying socioeconomic disparities and stress genomics need consideration in racially diverse pain cohorts. Differences in education/understanding might influence regional analgesia use. Potential provider bias in objective pain assessments in AA children needs to be ruled out. Grant support from 1R01AR075857 (NIAMS).

Effect of Preincisional Liposomal Bupivacaine Sternal Blockade on Poststernotomy Opioid Use

BackgroundProlonged and excessive opioid use in the postoperative setting is associated with multiple complications. The use of regional analgesia may reduce postoperative opioid use. MethodsIn a placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial patients undergoing sternotomy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a liposomal bupivacaine parasternal block or a normal saline parasternal injection. The primary endpoint was total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) used in the immediate 72-hour postoperative period. Secondary endpoints were intraoperative opioid use, pain scores, time to reach recovery milestones, and incidence of postoperative complications. ResultsTwenty-five patients received a normal saline injection, and 27 patients received an anesthetic sternal block. Randomization achieved excellent balance in demographics and comorbidities between the groups. Total postoperative opioid requirements at 72 hours were similar between the treatment and control groups (25.8 ± 10.4 vs 29.4 ± 16.3 MMEs, P = .60). Intraoperative opioid requirements were also similar between the 2 groups (124.8 ± 222.5 vs 114.9 ± 148.0 MMEs, P = .86). Length of stay in the intensive care unit (3.4 ± 2.5 vs 3.5 ± 2.6 days, P = .86) and hospital (8.7 ± 5.0 vs 7.5 ± 3.0 days, P = .45), time until return of bowel function (3.7 ± 1.4 vs 3.3 ± 1.4 days, P = .42), incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (24% vs 22.2%, P = .88), and incidence of nausea (24% vs 33.3%, P = .46) were similar. ConclusionsPreincisional sternal blockade with liposomal bupivacaine did not reduce the amount of opioid medication administered to patients in the first 72 hours after sternotomy.

Use of regional analgesia and risk of delirium in older adults with multiple rib fractures: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study.

Single-center data demonstrates that regional analgesia (RA) techniques are associated with reduced risk of delirium in older patients with multiple rib fractures. We hypothesized that a similar effect between RA and delirium would be identified in a larger cohort of patients from multiple level I trauma centers. Retrospective data from seven level I trauma centers were collected for intensive care unit (ICU) patients 65 years or older with ≥3 rib fractures from January 2012 to December 2016. Those with a head and/or spine injury Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of ≥ 3 or a history of dementia were excluded. Delirium was defined as one positive Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit score in the first 7 days of ICU care. Poisson regression with robust standard errors was used to determine the association of RA (thoracic epidural or paravertebral catheter) with delirium incidence. Data of 574 patients with a median age of 75 years (interquartile range [IQR], 69-83), Injury Severity Score of 14 (IQR, 11-18), and ICU length of stay of 3 days (IQR, 2-6 days) were analyzed. Among the patients, 38.9% were women, 15.3% were non-White, and 31.4% required a chest tube. Regional analgesia was used in 19.3% patients. Patient characteristics did not differ by RA use; however, patients with RA had more severe chest injury (chest AIS, flail segment, hemopneumothorax, thoracostomy tube). In univariate analysis, there was no difference in the likelihood of delirium between the RA and no RA groups (18.9% vs. 23.8% p = 0.28). After adjusting for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, maximum chest AIS, thoracostomy tube, ICU length of stay, and trauma center, RA was associated with reduced risk of delirium (incident rate ratio [IRR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.94) but not with in-hospital mortality (IRR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-1.26) or respiratory complications (IRR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.16). In this multicenter cohort of injured older adults with multiple rib fractures, RA use was associated with a 35% lower risk of delirium. Further studies are needed to standardize protocols for optimal pain management and prevention of delirium in older adults with severe thoracic injury. Therapeutic, level IV; Epidemiologic, level III.

Regional analgesia for lower leg trauma and the risk of acute compartment syndrome: Guideline from the Association of Anaesthetists.

SummaryPain resulting from lower leg injuries and consequent surgery can be severe. There is a range of opinion on the use of regional analgesia and its capacity to obscure the symptoms and signs of acute compartment syndrome. We offer a multi‐professional, consensus opinion based on an objective review of case reports and case series. The available literature suggested that the use of neuraxial or peripheral regional techniques that result in dense blocks of long duration that significantly exceed the duration of surgery should be avoided. The literature review also suggested that single‐shot or continuous peripheral nerve blocks using lower concentrations of local anaesthetic drugs without adjuncts are not associated with delays in diagnosis provided post‐injury and postoperative surveillance is appropriate and effective. Post‐injury and postoperative ward observations and surveillance should be able to identify the signs and symptoms of acute compartment syndrome. These observations should be made at set frequencies by healthcare staff trained in the pathology and recognition of acute compartment syndrome. The use of objective scoring charts is recommended by the Working Party. Where possible, patients at risk of acute compartment syndrome should be given a full explanation of the choice of analgesic techniques and should provide verbal consent to their chosen technique, which should be documented. Although the patient has the right to refuse any form of treatment, such as the analgesic technique offered or the surgical procedure proposed, neither the surgeon nor the anaesthetist has the right to veto a treatment recommended by the other.

Development of a Structured Regional Analgesia Program for Postoperative Pain Management.

We pursued the use of regional analgesia (RA) to minimize the use of postoperative opioids. Our aim was to increase the use of postoperative RA for eligible surgical procedures in the NICU from 0% to 80% by June 30, 2019. A multidisciplinary team determined the eligibility criteria, developed an extensive process map, implemented comprehensive education, and a structured process for communication of postoperative pain management plans. Daily pain team rounds provided an opportunity for collaborative comanagement. An additional 30 minutes for catheter placement was added in operating room (OR) scheduling so that it would not affect the surgeon OR time. There were 21 eligible surgeries in the baseline period and 34 in the intervention period. In total, 30 of 34 infants in eligible surgeries (88%) received RA. The average total opioid exposure in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents decreased from 5.0 to 1.1 mg/kg in the intervention group. The average time to extubation was 45 hours in the baseline period and 19.9 hours in the intervention group. After interventions, 75% of infants were extubated in the OR, as compared with 10.5% in the baseline period. No difference was seen in postoperative pain scores or postoperative hypothermia between the baseline and intervention groups. We used quality improvement methodology to develop a structured RA program. We demonstrated a significant reduction in opioid requirements and need for mechanical ventilation postoperatively for those infants who received RA. Our findings support safe and effective use of RA, and provide a framework for implementation of a similar program.

Evidence Review Conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: Focus on Anesthesiology for Hip Fracture Surgery.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols represent patient-centered, evidence-based, multidisciplinary care of the surgical patient. Although these patterns have been validated in numerous surgical specialities, ERAS has not been widely described for patients undergoing hip fracture (HFx) repair. As part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery, we have conducted a full evidence review of interventions that form the basis of the anesthesia components of the ERAS HFx pathway. A literature search was performed for each protocol component, and the highest levels of evidence available were selected for review. Anesthesiology components of care were identified and evaluated across the perioperative continuum. For the preoperative phase, the use of regional analgesia and nonopioid multimodal analgesic agents is suggested. For the intraoperative phase, a standardized anesthetic with postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis is suggested. For the postoperative phase, a multimodal (primarily nonopioid) analgesic regimen is suggested. A summary of the best available evidence and recommendations for inclusion in ERAS protocols for HFx repair are provided.

Predicting chronic pain after major traumatic injury.

Background and aims Chronic pain after traumatic injury and surgery is highly prevalent, and associated with substantial psychosocial co-morbidities and prolonged opioid use. It is currently unclear whether predicting chronic post-injury pain is possible. If so, it is unclear if predicting chronic post-injury pain requires a comprehensive set of variables or can be achieved only with data available from the electronic medical records. In this prospective study, we examined models to predict pain at the site of injury 3-6 months after hospital discharge among adult patients after major traumatic injury requiring surgery. Two models were developed: one with a comprehensive set of predictors and one based only on variables available in the electronic medical records. Methods We examined pre-injury and post-injury clinical variables, and clinical management of pain. Patients were interviewed to assess chronic pain, defined as the presence of pain at the site of injury. Prediction models were developed using forward stepwise regression, using follow-up surveys at 3-6 months. Potential predictors identified a priori were: age; sex; presence of pre-existing chronic pain; intensity of post-operative pain at 6 h; in-hospital opioid consumption; injury severity score (ISS); location of trauma, defined as body region; use of regional analgesia intra- and/or post-operatively; pre-trauma PROMIS Depression, Physical Function, and Anxiety scores; in-hospital Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Score; and number of post-operative non-opioid medications. After the final model was developed, a reduced model, based only on variables available in the electronic medical record was run to understand the "value add" of variables taken from study-specific instruments. Results Of 173 patients who completed the baseline interview, 112 completed the follow-up within 3-6 months. The prevalence of chronic pain was 66%. Opioid use increased from 16% pre-injury to 28% at 3-6 months. The final model included six variables, from an initial set of 24 potential predictors. The apparent area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.78 for predicting pain 3-6 months was optimism-corrected to 0.73. The reduced final model, using only data available from the electronic health records, included post-surgical pain score at 6 h, presence of a head injury, use of regional analgesia, and the number of post-operative non-opioid medications used for pain relief. This reduced model had an apparent AUROC of 0.76, optimism-corrected to 0.72. Conclusions Pain 3-6 months after trauma and surgery is highly prevalent and associated with an increase in opioid use. Chronic pain at the site of injury at 3-6 months after trauma and surgery may be predicted during hospitalization by using routinely collected clinical data. Implications If our model is validated in other populations, it would provide a tool that can be easily implemented by any provider with access to medical records. Patients at risk of developing chronic pain could be selected for studies on preventive strategies, thereby concentrating the interventions to patients who are most likely to transition to chronic pain.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Thoracic Surgery: the Anesthesiologist's Perspective

"Enhanced Recovery after Surgery" programs have been developed for thoracic surgery over the last couple of years. Besides minimally invasive surgical techniques, there are a number of anaesthesiological aspects like the choice of short acting anaesthetics, the use of regional analgesia, a balanced intraoperative fluid therapy, the avoidance of postoperative nausea and vomiting and, most importantly, protective ventilation, that need to be considered. In patients undergoing thoracic surgery procedures with preexisting severe limitations in pulmonary function, protective ventilation under the conditions of one lung ventilation often leads to severe dysfunction of pulmonary gas exchange. In this situation, establishing veno-venous membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is a sufficient and safe method to facilitate perioperative treatment of these patients. Postoperatively, patients benefit from the continuation of the conscious vvECMO by augmentation of necessary therapeutic procedures such as physical and respiratory therapy or early mobilisation as well as healing of air leakage of the operated lung. To avoid bleeding complications, ECMO can be operated without anticoagulation intraoperatively with heparin-coating of the tube system. Postoperatively, heparin, argatroban or bivalirudin are options for anticoagulation. New techniques like minimally-invasive thoracic surgery under regional anaesthesia and sedation can potentially be developed further using vvECMO support in the future.

Decreased Risk of Delirium With Use of Regional Analgesia in Geriatric Trauma Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures.

The aim of this study was to examine the risk of delirium in geriatric trauma patients with rib fractures treated with systemic opioids compared with those treated with regional analgesia (RA). Delirium is a modifiable complication associated with increased morbidity and mortality. RA may reduce the need for opioid medications, which are associated with delirium in older adults. Cohort study of patients ≥65 years admitted to a regional trauma center from 2011 to 2016. Inclusion factors were ≥ 3 rib fractures, blunt trauma mechanism, and admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Exclusion criteria included head AIS ≥3, spine AIS ≥3, dementia, and death within 24 hours. The primary outcome was delirium positive ICU days, defined using the CAM-ICU assessment. Delirium incident rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using generalized linear mixed models with Poisson distribution and robust standard errors. Of the 144 patients included in the study, 27 (19%) received Acute Pain Service consultation and RA and 117 (81%) received opioid-based systemic analgesia. Patients with RA had more severe chest injury than those without. The risk of delirium decreased by 24% per day per patient with use of RA (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.96). Individual opioid use, as measured in daily morphine equivalents (MEDs), was significantly reduced after initiation of RA (mean difference -7.62, 95% CI -14.4 to -0.81). Although use of RA techniques in geriatric trauma patients with multiple rib fractures was associated with higher MED, opioid use decreased after RA initiation and Acute Pain Service consultation, and the risk of delirium was lower.

Inpatient opioid use after vaginal delivery

More than half of patients hospitalized annually receive an opioid during their inpatient hospitalization, which may serve as a first opioid exposure. Although recent research addresses outpatient opioid prescribing following delivery, little is known regarding the extent to which opioids are used during the postpartum hospitalization following vaginal delivery. Our objectives were as follows: (1) to describe the use of opioids during the last 24 hours of postpartum hospitalization in women following vaginal delivery and (2) to identify patient and provider characteristics associated with the use of opioids during this time period. This is a retrospective case-control study of women who underwent vaginal delivery at a single tertiary care center from Dec. 1, 2015, to Nov. 30, 2016. Inpatient, pharmacy, and administrative records were queried for clinical and inpatient prescriber data. Opioid use during the last 24 hours of the postpartum hospitalization was determined. Significant factors on bivariable analysis were assessed in multivariable hierarchical logistic regression with random effects to identify patient and provider factors associated with any opioid use. A subgroup analysis of women who underwent an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, defined as lack of intrapartum, postpartum, or neonatal complications, was performed. In this cohort of 9038 women after a vaginal delivery, almost a quarter (n= 2242, 24.8%) utilized opioids during the last 24 hours of the postpartum hospitalization. In a multivariable analysis, several patient characteristics were associated with increased odds of opioid use during the last 24 hours of admission, including higher body mass index, history of smoking and substance abuse, use of regional analgesia, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, major laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, and infectious complication. Even after adjusting for these characteristics, greater use of acetaminophen (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81, 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.85) and analgesia orders written by an advanced practitioner (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46, 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.73) remained associated with decreased odds of using an opioid. The same 2 factors remained associated with less opioid use (acetaminophen doses [adjusted odds ratio, 0.86, 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.92] and analgesia orders written by an advanced practitioner [adjusted odds ratio, 0.52, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.89]) when only women who had an uncomplicated vaginal delivery were analyzed. In a large cohort, nearly one-quarter of women use opioid analgesia during the last 24 hours of inpatient hospitalization following vaginal delivery. Although patient factors account for some of the variation in inpatient opioid use, both use of acetaminophen and having had postpartum orders written by an advanced practitioner were independently associated with lower odds of inpatient opioid use.

Immersion in water during labour and birth.

Background Enthusiasts suggest that labouring in water and waterbirth increase maternal relaxation, reduce analgesia requirements and promote a midwifery model of care. Critics cite the risk of neonatal water inhalation and maternal/neonatal infection. Objectives To assess the evidence from randomised controlled trials about immersion in water during labour and waterbirth on maternal, fetal, neonatal and caregiver outcomes. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2011) and reference lists of retrieved studies. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing immersion in any bath tub/pool with no immersion, or other non-pharmacological forms of pain management during labour and/or birth, in women during labour who were considered to be at low risk of complications, as defined by the researchers. Data collection and analysis We assessed trial eligibility and quality and extracted data independently. One review author entered data and the other checked for accuracy. Main results This review includes 12 trials (3243 women): eight related to just the first stage of labour: one to early versus late immersion in the first stage of labour; two to the first and second stages; and another to the second stage only. We identified no trials evaluating different baths/pools, or the management of third stage of labour. Results for the first stage of labour showed there was a significant reduction in the epidural/spinal/paracervical analgesia/anaesthesia rate amongst women allocated to water immersion compared to controls (478/1254 versus 529/1245; risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 to 0.99, six trials). There was also a reduction in duration of the first stage of labour (mean difference -32.4 minutes; 95% CI -58.7 to -6.13). There was no difference in assisted vaginal deliveries (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.05, seven trials), caesarean sections (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.68, eight trials), use of oxytocin infusion (RR 0.64; 95%CI 0.32 to 1.28,five trials), perineal trauma or maternal infection. There were no differences for Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 1.58; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.93, five trials), neonatal unit admissions (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.57, three trials), or neonatal infection rates (RR 2.00; 95% CI 0.50 to 7.94, five trials). Of the three trials that compared water immersion during the second stage with no immersion, one trial showed a significantly higher level of satisfaction with the birth experience (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.80). A lack of data for some comparisons prevented robust conclusions. Further research is needed. Authors' conclusions Evidence suggests that water immersion during the first stage of labour reduces the use of epidural/spinal analgesia and duration of the first stage of labour. There is limited information for other outcomes related to water use during the first and second stages of labour, due to intervention and outcome variability. There is no evidence of increased adverse effects to the fetus/neonate or woman from labouring in water or waterbirth. However, the studies are very variable and considerable heterogeneity was detected for some outcomes. Further research is needed.

Continuous support for women during childbirth.

Continuous support for women during childbirth.

The Impact of Paravertebral Block Analgesia on Breast Cancer Survival After Surgery.

The impact of regional anesthesia on breast cancer recurrence is controversial. We tested the hypothesis that the use of paravertebral block (PVB) analgesia during breast cancer surgery prolongs the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of women with breast cancer. Seven hundred ninety-two women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided based on the administration of PVB analgesia for mastectomy surgeries. One hundred ninety-eight (25%) were given a PVB, the remainder were treated with opioid-based analgesia. Propensity score matching was developed using several variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the impact of PVB analgesia on RFS and OS. The median follow-up times for RFS and OS were 5.8 and 6 years, respectively. In the propensity score matching model, a total of 396 women were included in each group of treatment (non-PVB group, n = 198 vs PVB group, n = 198). As expected, the fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in PVB (122.8 ± 77.85 μg) patients than non-PVB subjects (402.23 ± 343.8 μg). Other variables were not statistically significant. After adjusting for several important covariates, the analysis indicated that the use of PVB is not associated with a significant change in RFS [1.60 (0.81-3.16), P = 0.172] or OS [1.28 (0.55-3.01)] survival. This retrospective study does not support the hypothesis that the use of regional analgesia is associated with longer survival after surgery for breast cancer.