Use Of Neutropenic Diet Research Articles

Dissemination of Information on Neutropenic Diet by Top US Cancer Centers: In-line with the Evidence?

Aim: The neutropenic diet is commonly prescribed to cancer patients with neutropenia with the goal of reducing infections. However, multiple randomized trials have proved no benefit with neutropenic diets compared to less restricted diets with regards to reducing infectious risk. We aimed to ascertain if top cancer centers recommended for or against the use of neutropenic diets on their official websites. Methods: We reviewed the websites of the top 20 hospitals in the 2017 US News Best Hospitals for Cancer©, and ascertained recommendations for neutropenic diet (for, against, equivocal, or not addressed). Results: Seven websites (35%) made recommendations for, four (20%) against, and nine (45%) did not address the neutropenic diet. Only five (25%) backed any of their recommendations with evidence (four against, one for), including two (10%) links to abstracts (both against), whereas seven mentioned the FDA safe food handling guidelines (non-exclusive). Type of recommendation made (for or against) did not depend on US News rank (top vs bottom 10; p = 1.00.). Conclusion: The neutropenic diet continues to be recommended on many (35%) websites of top US cancer centers, despite strong evidence against its use. The website content of major US cancer centers should be updated to better guide patients regarding neutropenic diets.

Effect of Neutropenic Diet on Infection Rates in Cancer Patients With Neutropenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Neutropenic diets are commonly prescribed to cancer patients with neutropenia with the intention of reducing rates of infection. These diets are restrictive and are associated with lower patient satisfaction and possibly malnutrition. Further, it is unclear if these restrictive diets are effective in reducing infection. We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of infection reported in trials comparing the neutropenic diet to unrestricted diets in cancer patients with neutropenia. A comprehensive database search for all published randomized controlled trials comparing infection rates in cancer patients receiving a neutropenic diet versus an unrestricted diet was performed for all publications in English language from database's inception until September 12, 2017. The search strategy, study selection, and subsequent analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Random effects modeling was used to obtain pooled relative risks. The primary outcome measure was the rate of infection. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 388 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients mostly had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or sarcoma. Infection was noted in 53.7% patients in the neutropenic diet group, as compared with 50% in the unrestricted diet group. No significant difference in infection rate was observed between the neutropenic diet versus unrestricted diet groups, pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.13 (95% CI, 0.98-1.30; P=0.10). This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggests that the use of neutropenic diet was not associated with decreased risk of infection in neutropenic cancer patients. The continued use of neutropenic diets should be questioned.

Optimization of nutrition during allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation.

Malnutrition before and during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Yet, optimal use of nutritional support to improve outcomes remains controversial. Our aim was to do an up-to-date literature review regarding nutritional therapy in allogeneic HSCT, the neutropenic diet and the use of immunonutrients. Several observational studies find malnutrition to be associated with poor outcome, increased complications and lower overall survival. There are, however, few interventional trials proving the benefits of nutritional therapy in this population compared with no nutritional treatment. Regarding routes of treatment, studies suggested that parenteral nutrition is associated with higher risk for complications compared with enteral nutrition. Whether the use of specific formulas, such as immunonutrition, has a beneficial effect on clinical outcome is not established yet. Strict use of neutropenic diets did not show a reduction in infection risk and clinical outcome, and can no longer be recommended. Our updated search confirms that malnutrition is a strong negative predictor for outcome, yet optimal use of nutritional interventions to prevent or treat malnutrition remains ill-defined. There is need for larger randomized trials to better address these issues in the future.

Investigating the use of the neutropenic diet: a survey of U.K. dietitians.

Patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia are at increased risk of infection. Historically, dietary restrictions commonly referred to as 'clean', 'low bacteria', 'low-microbial' or 'neutropenic' diets have been prescribed to reduce the risk of foodborne infection. Although research does not support their effectiveness, they continue to be used in clinical practice. The present study aimed to investigate the use of dietary restrictions in patients with cancer in the UK by surveying registered dietitians (RDs). An online questionnaire was distributed to 573 RDs via local and specialist interest groups of the British Dietetic Association. One hundred and ten questionnaires were returned. Of these, 67.8% of RDs prescribed dietary restrictions to patients, with 'neutropenic diet' being the most commonly used term. Specialist oncology or haematology RDs were more likely to use the diet than nonspecialist RDs (P<0.005). The variety of foods restricted varied greatly and was often contradicting. Unpasteurised dairy products and raw or lightly cooked meat or fish were most commonly restricted. Less than half (43.6%) of RDs had a policy in place for the use of neutropenic diets, with specialist oncology and haematology RDs more likely to report this (P<0.005). Neutropenic dietary advice provided by dietitians in the UK varies greatly. Further high-quality research is required to create an evidence base from which national clinical guidelines can be formed.

Neutropenic diet and quality of food: a critical analysis

Neutropenic diet and quality of food: a critical analysis

Questioning the Role of a Neutropenic Diet following Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation

The use of a neutropenic diet (ND) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was instituted more than 30 years ago as a means of preventing infection from organisms colonizing the gastrointestinal tract. Evidence supporting this practice is lacking, however, and the actual efficacy of the ND remains unknown. Institutional policy at Northwestern Memorial Hospital discontinued the use of ND in 2006. We conducted a retrospective study of 726 consecutive HSCT recipients, 363 who received an ND and 363 who received a general hospital diet, to determine the incidence of microbiologically confirmed infections during and after transplantation. Our findings indicate a higher rate of infections in the HSCT recipients who received an ND.

Neutropenic diets in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Neutropenic diets in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The Benefit of the Neutropenic Diet: Fact or Fiction?

There really should not be a debate about the use of neutropenic diet for cancer patients. Its usefulness has never been scientifically proven. However, neutropenic diets remain in place in many institutions even though their usefulness is controversial. Neutropenic diets were once thought to be important in protecting patients from having to succumb to infection from neutropenia while undergoing chemotherapy. Although food may contain harmful organisms and research has shown that bacterial translocation is possible, recent studies have been unable to obtain significant differences between placebo and intervention groups. The dietetic challenges neutropenic patients struggle with include decreased quality of life, malnutrition, gastrointestinal side effects, food aversion, and impaired cell-mediated immunity from vitamin deficiency. Unanswered questions in regard to the neutropenic diet include the following: (a) which food should be included; (b) which food preparation techniques improve patient compliance; (c) which patient populations benefit most; and (d) when should such a diet be initiated. Without scientific evidence, the best advice for neutropenic patients is to follow food safety guidelines as indicated by government entities.