Use Of Multiple Arterial Grafts Research Articles

Coronary artery bypass with single versus multiple arterial grafts in women: A meta-analysis.

The study objective was to investigate the impact of multiple arterial grafting on long-term all-cause mortality in women undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A comprehensive search was performed to identify observational studies reporting outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting reported by sex and stratified into multiple arterial grafting versus single arterial grafting strategies. Articles were considered for inclusion if they were written in English and were propensity-matched observational studies. Included studies were then pooled in a meta-analysis performed using the generic inverse variance method. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality and spontaneous myocardial infarction. Meta-regression was used to explore the effects of preoperative and intraoperative variables on the primary outcome. A total of 6 studies with 32,793 women (25,714 single arterial grafting and 7079 multiple arterial grafting) were included. Women who received multiple arterial grafting had lower long-term mortality (incidence rate ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96; P=.007) and spontaneous myocardial infarction (incidence rate ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.93; P=.003) compared with women who received single arterial grafting, but the difference in mortality disappeared when including only the 3 largest studies. There was no difference between groups in operative mortality (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.17; P=.91). Meta-regression did not identify any associations with the incidence rate ratio for long-term mortality. The use of multiple arterial grafting in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with lower long-term mortality, although the difference is mostly driven by small series. Further studies, including randomized trials, are needed to evaluate the efficacy of multiple arterial grafting in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Multiple Arterial Graft Use in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Surgeon Perspective vs Practice

BackgroundDespite supportive evidence and guidelines, the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) in coronary artery bypass grafting remains low. We sought to determine surgeon perception of personal MAG use and compare this with actual MAG use. MethodsWe conducted a statewide surgeon survey of MAG use, presence of a hospital MAG protocol, and barriers for MAG use, with a response rate of 78% (n = 25). Surgeon survey responses were compared with actual Society of Thoracic Surgeons patient data from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020 using χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. ResultsOf 5299 patients who had first-time, nonemergent, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (≥2 grafts) by responding surgeons, 16% received MAG (n = 825). MAG use in patients whose surgeons self-designated as “routine” MAG users was 21% vs 7% for “nonroutine” users. Surgeons with a hospital protocol for MAG use utilized MAG more often (18% vs 14%, P = .001). Surgeons who were unconvinced by the data on the benefits of MAGs used MAGs in 11% vs 22% in surgeons who were convinced. MAG use increased over time, particularly from before to after the survey (13.1% vs 30.5%, P < .001). ConclusionsAlthough MAG use increased over time, barriers to routine use remain. In surgeons who reported routine use, only 21% of their patients received MAGs. Hospital protocols, education, and increased awareness may reduce barriers to use and encourage evidence-based clinical practice.

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Early Outcomes and Midterm Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Single or Multivessel Robotic TECAB and PCI.

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is the integration of sternal-sparing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). It is traditionally performed with single-vessel bypass (left internal mammary artery [LIMA] to left anterior descending artery [LAD]) and PCI but can also be accomplished with multiple arterial grafts using bilateral IMA conduits. We sought to review our HCR experience over an 8-year period with robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) and PCI. Of 694 patients undergoing beating-heart TECAB from August 2013 to June 2022, 306 patients were designated as intention-to-treat HCR candidates. Patients underwent PCI prior to, the same day as, or following TECAB, performed using single or bilateral IMA grafts. We retrospectively reviewed early and midterm outcomes up to 8 years in this cohort of patients. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 1.5% ± 2.5%. There were 44 patients (14%) who had ≥70% left main disease and 218 patients (71%) who had triple-vessel disease. A total of 193 patients (63%) underwent multivessel grafting (advanced HCR), with 83% bilateral IMA use. Mean operative time was 263 ± 80 min, and mean length of stay was 2.6 days. The mean number of vessels bypassed per patient was 1.7 ± 0.6. The mean number of vessels stented was 1.2 ± 0.5. Of the patients, 84% underwent TECAB first, 14% PCI first, and 2% same-day TECAB/PCI. Mortality was 0.6% (observed to expected ratio: 0.42). Early graft patency was 97% (328 of 339 grafts); LIMA-LAD patency was 98%. At 8-year follow-up (mean 37 ± 26 months), all-cause and cardiac-related mortality were 13% and 2.6%, respectively. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 92%. In patients with multivessel CAD, integrating robotic single and multivessel TECAB with PCI resulted in excellent early and midterm outcomes. In experienced hands, the robotic endoscopic approach allows the routine use of multiple arterial grafting during HCR.

Trend and factors associated with multiple arterial revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK

Benefits of using multiple arterial grafting (MAG), over single arterial grafting in major adverse cardiac event rates and the need for repeat revascularization, have been widely reported. Several guidelines have recommended the use of MAG in selected patients. We report the trend of MAG in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the UK. This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected UK national database in patients undergoing non-emergency, isolated CABG from 1996 to 2018. Patients were divided into single arterial grafting and MAG, and trends in perioperative characteristics were analysed. A total of 336321 patients were included, of whom 284003 (84.44%) received single arterial grafting and 52318 (15.56%) received MAG. The use of MAG after an initial increase from 1996 to 2001, steadily decreased thereafter, particularly in the use of radial artery. MAG was likely to be performed in younger patients [66.72 (standard deviation: 9.22) vs 62.30 (standard deviation: 10.06), P < 0.001] and males (85% vs 81%, P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, the single arterial grafting group was more likely to undergo on-pump CABG (90% vs 69%, P < 0.001), experienced a lower in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001) and incidence of return to theatre for bleeding (2.5% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001). Our data show that the use of MAG in CABG in the UK after an initial increase from 1996 to 2001 steadily decreased thereafter until 2018. This is likely to be multifactorial and a better understanding of the main causes may contribute to establishing the best indication for MAG in everyday clinical practice.

Long-term survival after coronary bypass surgery with multiple versus single arterial grafts.

OBJECTIVESThis study sought to evaluate the long-term differences in survival between multiple arterial grafts (MAG) and single arterial grafts (SAG) in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the SYNTAX study.METHODSThe present analysis included the randomized and registry-treated CABG patients (n = 1509) from the SYNTAX Extended Survival study (SYNTAXES). Patients with only venous (n = 42) or synthetic grafts (n = 1) were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause death at the longest follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Sensitivity analysis using propensity matching with inverse probability for treatment weights was performed.RESULTSOf the 1466 included patients, 465 (31.7%) received MAG and 1001 (68.3%) SAG. Patients receiving MAG were younger and at lower risk. At the longest follow-up of 12.6 years, all-cause death occurred in 23.6% of MAG and 40.0% of SAG patients [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.55–0.98); P = 0.038], which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis. MAG in patients with the three-vessel disease was associated with significant lower unadjusted and adjusted all-cause death at 12.6 years [adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI (0.44–0.97); P = 0.033]. In contrast, no significance was observed after risk adjustment in patients with the left main disease, with and without diabetes, or among SYNTAX score tertiles.CONCLUSIONSIn the present post hoc analysis of all-comers patients from the SYNTAX trial, MAG resulted in markedly lower all-cause death at 12.6-year follow-up compared to a SAG strategy. Hence, this striking long-term survival benefit of MAG over SAG encourages more extensive use of multiple arterial grafting in selected patients with reasonable life expectancy.Trial registrationSYNTAXES ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT03417050; SYNTAX ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT00114972.

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Measures to Increase Use of Multiple Arterial Grafts for Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) provides superior patency and long-term survival benefit compared with venous grafts during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, MAGs are used infrequently for CABG. We hypothesized that specific measures introduced at our institution would lead to an increase in the use of MAGs. Use of MAGs before and after introduction of bundled measures was compared. Measures included increased education in arterial graft harvesting, inclusion as a quality metric, and hiring of surgeon champions. Patients younger than 70 years who underwent first time, isolated CABG using at least 1 arterial graft were included. Number and type of grafts used were compared between time periods using chi-square test. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. Complications were compared between time periods, as well as between MAG and non-MAG recipients before and after propensity score matching using Fisher exact test and univariate logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine patient characteristics associated with MAG use. There were 2,169 patients included from 2012 to 2019. MAG use increased significantly after introduction of measures (21.1% to 41.9%; p < 0.001). Radial artery use with an internal mammary artery (0.3% to 16%; p < 0.001) and the use of triple arterial grafts increased significantly (0% to 2.4%; p < 0.001). MAG use in the entire cohort was associated with decreased 30-day mortality and postoperative cardiac arrest that was not significant after propensity matching. A programmatic emphasis on the use of MAGs for CABG is an effective method to increase its use.

Differences in Long-term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts and the Association With Sex

Sex-related differences in the outcome of using multiple arterial grafts during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain uncertain. To compare the outcomes of the use of multiple arterial grafts vs a single arterial graft during CABG for women and men. This statewide cohort study used data from New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System and New York's Vital Statistics file on 63 402 patients undergoing CABG from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014. Statistical analysis was performed from January 10 to August 20, 2020. Multiple arterial grafting or single arterial grafting. Mortality, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, repeated revascularization, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (composite of mortality, AMI, and stroke), and major adverse cardiac event (composite of mortality, AMI, or repeated revascularization) were compared among propensity-matched patients and stratified by the risk of long-term mortality. Of the 63 402 patients (48 155 men [76.0%]; mean [SD] age, 69.9 [10.5] years) in the study, women had worse baseline characteristics than men for most of the explored variables. Propensity matching yielded a total of 9512 male pairs and 1860 female pairs. At 7 years of follow-up, mortality was lower among men who underwent multiple arterial grafting (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87) but not women who underwent multiple arterial grafting (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15). When stratified by the estimated risk of death, the use of multiple arterial grafts was associated with better survival and a lower rate of a major adverse cardiac event among low-risk, but not high-risk, patients of both sexes, and the risk cutoff was different for men and women. This study suggests that women have a worse preoperative risk profile than men. Multiple arterial grafting is associated with better outcomes among low-risk, but not high-risk, patients, and the risk cutoffs differ between sexes. These data highlight the need for new studies on the outcome of multiple arterial grafts in women.

How to build a multi-arterial coronary artery bypass programme: a stepwise approach.

Observational evidence shows that the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAG) is associated with longer postoperative survival and improved clinical outcomes. The current European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend the use of MAG in appropriate patients. However, a significant volume-to-outcome relationship exists for MAG, and lack of sufficient experience is associated with increased operative risk. A stepwise approach to building experience with MAG allows successful implementation of this technique into routine coronary surgery practice.

Sex-related differences in outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery-A patient-level pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials: rationale and study protocol.

The impact of sex on the outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is controversial. The majority of CABG studies are retrospectively collected clinical or registry data, women comprise only a minority, and the reported findings represent the male predominated cohort. This individual patient meta-analysis is aimed at evaluating sex-related differences in outcomes after CABG using high quality data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic literature search will be performed to identify all CABG RCTs (minimum follow-up: 5 years). Detailed specification for the minimum deidentified patient records' data requirements will be provided to RCT primary contact to request their deidentified data for pooling. The pooled analysis will follow the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) and the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for individual patient data systematic reviews (PRISMA-IPD) recommendations and will compare sex-related outcomes after CABG. The main hypothesis is that outcomes after CABG are worse in women than in men. We will also test whether treatment effects for off-pump and the use of multiple arterial grafts are present within each sex, and also, whether there are differential treatment effects between sexes. The primary endpoint will be a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization at long-term follow up. Ethics approval and participant consent for the study will be obtained locally by each study team if needed. Data will be disseminated and submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journals and meetings irrespective of study outcome.

Transatlantic editorial: the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in Europe and North America.

Transatlantic editorial: the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in Europe and North America.

Long-Term Outcome of Total Arterial Myocardial Revascularization Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Propensity-Match Analysis

ObjectiveDespite the improved survival in patients with multi-vessel coronary disease compared to conventional myocardial revascularization associated with the use of multiple arterial grafting for myocardial revascularization, it has been adopted in the minority of centers. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with and without diabetes undergoing total arterial versus conventional myocardial revascularization. MethodsAmong 1000 consecutive patients undergoing CABG, we performed a propensity-match analysis to compare patients with multi-vessel disease receiving total arterial (G1 = 618 pts) versus conventional myocardial revascularization (LIMA-LAD plus vein grafts, G2 = 382 pts). The primary end-point was survival free from all-cause and cardiac-related mortality, while the secondary end-point was the occurrence of major cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents. ResultsHospital mortality was similar (G1: 0 pts. vs G2: 1 pts., 0.3%, p = .91). At a median follow-up of 101 months (range 11–185 months), total arterial grafting was associated with significantly improved survival free from overall (G1 = 76.5 ± 3.0% vs G2 = 66.0 ± 3.1%; p < .001) and cardiac mortality (general population: G1 = 90.8 ± 2.1% vs G2 = 84.2 ± 1.9%, p = .043; diabetics:G1 = 84.7 ± 2.1 vs G2: 79.3 ± 3.4; p = .035) as well as occurrence of MACCEs (general population:G1 = 80.1 ± 3.2% vs G2 = 70.8 ± 2.9%; p > .001; diabetics:G1 = 77 ± 6 vs G2 = 53 ± 5.8; p < .001). Cox regression analysis identified diabetes (HR = 1.94, CI 95% = 1.12–2.93; p < .001) and the use of veins (HR = 1.81, CI 95% = 1.32–2.65; p < .001) as independent predictors for all-cause mortality; among diabetics, vein grafts was the strongest predictor of MACCEs (HR = 2.41, CI 95% = 1.27–4.59; p = .007) and cardiac mortality (HR = 3.24, CI 95% = 1.69–6.23; p < .001). ConclusionsLong-term survival following total arterial CABG is remarkably improved compared to conventional grafting with vein grafts especially in diabetic patients.

Arterial Grafts for Coronary Bypass: A Critical Review After the Publication of ART and RADIAL.

Observational and randomized evidence shows that arterial grafts have better patency rates than saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) in coronary artery bypass grafting. Observational studies suggest that the use of multiple arterial grafts is associated with longer postoperative survival, but this must be interpreted in the context of treatment allocation bias and hidden confounders intrinsic to the study designs. Recently, a pooled analysis of 6 randomized trials comparing the radial artery with the SVG as the second conduit and the largest randomized trial comparing the use of single and bilateral internal thoracic arteries have provided apparently divergent results about a clinical benefit with the use of >1 arterial conduit. However, both analyses have methodological limitations that may have influenced their results. At present, it is unclear whether the well-documented increased patency rate of arterial grafts translates into clinical benefits in the majority of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A large randomized trial testing the arterial grafts hypothesis (ROMA [Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcome of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts]) is underway and will report the results in a few years.

Multiple Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Disease

BackgroundDespite recent guideline statements, there is still wide practice variation in the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) versus single arterial grafts (SAGs) for patients with multivessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This may be related to differences in findings between observational and randomized controlled studies. ObjectivesThis study sought to compare intermediate-term MAG and SAG outcomes with enhanced matching to reduce selection bias. MethodsNew York’s cardiac registry identified 63,402 multivessel disease patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2014, to compare outcomes (median follow-up 6.5 years) for patients receiving SAGs and MAGs. SAG and MAG patients were propensity matched using 38 baseline characteristics to reduce selection bias. The primary endpoint was mortality, and secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization and a composite endpoint of mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. ResultsBefore matching, 20% of procedures employed MAG. At 1 year, there was no mortality difference between matched MAG and SAG patients (2.4% vs. 2.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93 to 1.32). At 7 years, MAG patients had lower mortality (12.7% vs. 14.3%, AHR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.93), a lower composite outcome (20.2% vs. 22.8%, AHR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.93), and a lower repeat revascularization rate (11.7% vs. 14.6%, AHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.87). At 7 years, the subgroups for which MAG did not have a lower mortality rate included patients with off-pump surgery, 2-vessel disease with right coronary artery disease, recent acute myocardial infarction, renal dysfunction, and patient ≥70 years of age. ConclusionsMortality and the composite outcome were similar between MAG and SAG patients at 1 year, but lower for MAG after 7 years. Patients of higher volume MAG surgeons experienced lower MAG mortality.

To promote wide use of multiple arterial grafting in coronary bypass surgery in China

多支动脉桥已成为国际上当今冠状动脉旁路移植术的重要发展方向，但我国应用很少，比例低，本文集中介绍国内几个中心的多支动脉桥应用经验，并就多支动脉桥临床应用的一些热点问题进行阐述，以推进多支动脉桥的应用，使更多的患者受益。.

New Strategies for Surgical Myocardial Revascularization.

We summarize the evidence on the new strategies for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Hybrid CABG implies surgical grafting of the left anterior descending artery and percutaneous treatment of the other target vessels, with the promise of combining the durable benefits of surgery with the less invasive approach of percutaneous coronary interventions. Robotic CABG and minimally invasive CABG are performed through minimal incision or port access with dedicated equipment and instruments. Anaortic coronary artery bypass refers to off-pump CABG using only in-situ grafts. The use of multiple arterial grafts has been shown to improve patency and is potentially associated with better clinical outcomes. All these techniques require dedicated training and are more complex than conventional CABG but can significantly improve the results of surgery. Validation of the results of these new approaches in large randomized trials is a priority for the surgical community.

The ROMA trial: why it is needed.

We herein summarize the current evidence on the clinical outcome associated with the use of single and multiple arterial grafts for coronary bypass surgery and the role and importance of the Randomized comparison of the clinical Outcome of single versus Multiple Arterial grafts (ROMA) trial. Observational evidence suggests that the use of multiple arterial grafts is associated with better clinical outcomes compared to the use of a single arterial graft. Randomized evidence is inconclusive; the 5-year interim analysis of the largest randomized trial on the topic did not show any clinical benefit associated with the use of bilateral versus single internal thoracic arteries, whereas a pooled analysis of the trials comparing the radial artery and the saphenous vein as a second graft showed a significant reduction in follow-up cardiac events using the radial artery. Hidden confounders and treatment allocation biases as well as methodological flaws are the most likely explanation of this contradiction. ROMA was conceived based on the lessons learned from a critical analysis of the existing randomized and observational evidence with the aim to provide a definitive answer to the question of the potential clinical benefit of multiple arterial grafts for coronary bypass.

Lessons learned from Radial Artery Database International ALliance (RADIAL).

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was first performed in the 1960s. As the surgery has evolved, there has been a growing interest in the use of multiple arterial grafts in CABG. Since the re-introduction of the radial artery (RA) to clinical use as a bypass conduit in the 1990s, there have been several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have compared saphenous vein graft (SVG) conduits to RA use in CABG. While most trials have shown improved patency of the RA, none of them have been able to demonstrate a survival benefit using the arterial conduit. In this review, we examine the existing RCTs on the subject. We then look at our solution to the decades-old inquiry regarding the RA compared with the SVG. The Radial Artery Database International ALliance (RADIAL) project is an individual patient-level meta-analysis developed to adequately power a study to assess if the RA has superior clinical outcomes compared with the SVG. We describe the process by which this investigation was conducted and the collaboration necessary to achieve success.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery use in coronary bypass surgery: is there a benefit?

Over the past three decades, there have been a plethora of retrospective observational data and meta-analyses which support the hypothesis of improved clinical outcomes using bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) when compared to saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). However, recently published results have brought this thinking into doubt. We discuss the existing literature on the subject and attempt to clarify the appropriate use of BITA in coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). A review of all existing meta-analyses on BITA was conducted to better understand the utility of BITA in CABG. A review of the largest randomized controlled trials on the subject was then compared to the observational data. In all existing meta-analyses, BITA shows a significant advantage over the use of a single internal thoracic artery (SITA) with SVGs. The two largest randomized controlled trials evaluating BITA failed to show a survival advantage and brought into question the complications associated with BITA. At present, the use of multiple arterial grafts remains a reasonable choice, particularly in young patients, provided that their use does not increase the operative risk. Further evidence currently being collected may lend a definitive answer in the near future.

Blaise Pascal and the evidence on the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass surgery after the interim analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Trial.

After the publication of the interim analysis of the ART, we review the contradiction between the large numbers of observational studies published on the course of over 25 years and the randomized trials comparing the use of single versus multiple arterial grafts for coronary bypass surgery. The Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART) found no difference in survival and event-free survival at 5 years between patients randomized to receive one or two internal thoracic arteries at the time of surgery. At the moment, there is evidence that arterial grafts have higher patency rate than venous grafts and a possible protective effect on the coronary circulation. Arterial grafts are still a reasonable choice, especially in patients with long life expectancy. Further studies and the final results of ART are needed.