Use Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Survival Improvement of StageIV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a US Population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) greatly improved outcomes of stageIV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized clinical trials. Limited data exists regarding the survival improvement of ICI use at the population level. Clinical data of patients with pathologically confirmed stageIV NSCLC diagnosed in 2013 and 2017 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival outcomes were compared before and after ICI use to assess the survival improvement in the immunotherapy era in the real world. A total of 19,433 patients with stageIV NSCLC were included. Being female, age < 60years, of American Indian and Asian or Pacific Islander race, married, non-squamous histology, without bone, brain, or liver metastases, and receiving chemotherapy were significantly associated with better prognosis in multivariable analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) based on associated factors resulted in 8743 patients each in the non-immunotherapy and immunotherapy groups (1:1 ratio). After PSM, both overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.001) were significantly improved in the immunotherapy group. The median OS (mOS) was 6.0months in the non-immunotherapy group and 8.0months in the immunotherapy group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rate was 29.0%, 14.2%, and 8.5% in the non-immunotherapy group, and 37.8%, 23.5%, and 16.7% in the immunotherapy group, respectively. Patients who were male, under 60years old, married, white, had adenocarcinoma, had no bone or liver metastases, and received chemotherapy or radiation therapy were more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Survival outcomes of patients with stageIV NSCLC were significantly improved in the immunotherapy era. Population-level benefits of survival varied among subgroups, and not all the increase in OS meant a clinically meaningful benefit.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Kidney Transplant Recipients - A Review of Potential Complications and Management Strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has enabled a paradigm shift in Oncology, with the treatment of metastatic cancer in certain tumor types becoming akin to the treatment of chronic disease. Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of developing cancer compared to the general population. Historically, KTR were excluded from ICI clinical trials due to concern for allograft rejection and decreased anti-tumor efficacy. While early post-marketing data revealed an allograft rejection risk of 40%-50%, 2 recent small prospective trials have demonstrated lower rates of rejection of 0%-12%, suggesting that maintenance immunosuppression modification prior to ICI start modulates rejection risk. Moreover, objective response rates induced by ICI for the treatment of advanced or metastatic skin cancer, the most common malignancy in KTR, have been comparable to those achieved by immune intact patients. Non-invasive biomarkers may have a role in risk-stratifying patients before starting ICI, and monitoring for rejection, though allograft biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis. This clinically focused review summarizes current knowledge on complications of ICI use in KTR, including their mechanism, risk mitigation strategies, non-invasive biomarker use, approaches to treatment of rejection, and suggestions for future directions in research.

Pembrolizumab-Associated Cardiotoxicity: A Retrospective Analysis of the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in the previous decade for the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Adverse events (AEs) can cause many symptoms, most notably cardiac. We analyzed the frequency of these adverse events, comparing pembrolizumab and other ICIs. Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting database (FAERS), we searched for all adverse events of interest reported for every ICI included in this study. After obtaining the data, we conducted a disproportionality analysis using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the information component (IC). A total of 6719 ICI-related cardiac adverse events of interest were reported in the database. Serious outcomes were reported in 100% of the cases, with 34.3% of the cases ending fatally. Compared with all other medications in the database, pembrolizumab use was more frequently associated with myocarditis, pericardial disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. No difference was found in cardiotoxicity between different ICIs. Although infrequent, cardiac AEs in pembrolizumab use are associated with serious outcomes and high mortality. Prospective studies are needed to further research the connection between ICI use and cardiotoxicity.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring HER2 mutations: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia

IntroductionHER2 mutations are reported to occur in 2%–5% of all cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based chemotherapy as 1st line treatment still remain unclear. MethodsUsing the large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, the clinico-genomic characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC were investigated. ResultsOf the 15,251 patients with NSCLC enrolled in the LC-SCRUM-Asia database, tumor HER2 mutations were detected in 402 patients (2.6 %). The most common subtype of HER2 mutations was exon 20 in-frame insertions (79 %), followed in frequency by mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain other than Exon20ins (10 %) and mutations in extracellular domains (7 %). NSCLCs harboring HER2 mutations showed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) as compared with NSCLCs harboring EGFR mutations or ALK fusions (median: 4.22 vs. 2.54 and 2.52 mutation per megabase, respectively). Of the 402 patients, 268 patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs (Chemo-ICI, n = 95) or without ICI (Chemo-alone, n = 173) as 1st line treatment. The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in the Chemo-ICI group as compared with the Chemo-alone group (median 8.5 vs. 6.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.66 [0.50–0.88]; P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified use of ICIs in addition to platinum-based chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS. There was no significant difference in the overall survival between the patients of the Chemo-ICI and Chemo-alone groups (median 31.1 vs. 23.3 months; HR [95 %CI]: 0.80 [0.57–1.12], P = 0.20). ConclusionsAddition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy in 1st line treatment may improve the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC. The relatively high TMB might be involved in the prolongation of the PFS in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy with ICIs.

7959 Combination Therapy Of Multi-Targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors And Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors In Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Abstract Disclosure: F. Yaylaci Mert: None. V. Balderrama Brondani: None. L.P. Marcal: None. M. Campbell: None. C. Jimenez: None. J. Varghese: None. A. Shah: None. M.A. Habra: None. Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer with limited response to systemic chemotherapies. Monotherapy with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in ACC patients has limited efficacy. Combining TKIs with ICIs increased response rates in other malignancies but the efficacy of this approach in ACC is still unknown. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of TKIs and ICIs in patients with advanced ACC. Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study in patients with advanced ACC treated with the combination of TKIs and ICIs. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) calculated from the time of combination, disease control rate (DCR), and safety profile were the main study objectives. Results: Seventeen patients were treated with combination therapy of TKI (lenvatinib or cabozantinib) and ICI (pembrolizumab) between January 2017 and December 2023. Eleven patients were women, the median age was 43.4 years (range 21.9-66.6), and 8 (47.1%) patients presented cortisol-producing tumors. All patients had prior systemic therapy, median of 3 (range 1-9) lines of therapy. The median duration of TKI+ICI therapy was 7.1 months (range 0.7-69.7). The treatment was discontinued in one patient due to a grade 3 adverse event (gastrointestinal fistula) after 1.6 months of treatment. Best overall responses were as follows: partial response 2 (13%), stable disease 8 (53%), and progressive disease 5 (34%). DCR was 58.8%. Median PFS was 7.1 months (range 0.7-66.4). One death occurred during the study due to disease progression. The median OS was 21.3 months (range 3.3-70.3). At the time of this report, 7 patients (41%) were still alive. Conclusion: The combined use of TKIs and ICIs in heavily treated ACC patients is associated with occasional durable responses and has a predictable and manageable side effect profile. This combination is worthy of a prospective clinical trial to validate the findings and establish new lines of therapy for this rare disease. Presentation: 6/2/2024

8114 The Need For Autoantibody Screening And Diagnostic Criteria For Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract Disclosure: A. Gupta: None. H. Sanekommu: None. A.B. Ravin: None. M. Akula: None. J. Cheng: None. Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as Nivolumab have been extensively studied, especially in relation to their side-effect profiles. Patients on Nivolumab are prone to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including type 1 diabetes mellitus, thyroiditis, and hypopituitarism. Prior studies have indicated that ICIs can unmask existing diabetic autoimmunities, but currently no specific guidelines exist for autoantibody screening prior to initiating treatment. We report a unique case of a young patient with newly diagnosed immune-checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes (ICI-T1DM) who was found to have mixed autoantibody results. Clinical Case: This is a 31-year-old male who was diagnosed with fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (pT23N0) and underwent partial hepatic resection later that year. Repeat imaging showed new hepatic lesions, thus Nivolumab was initiated. He received a total of three cycles, after which he presented to the hospital with symptoms of fever and nausea; labs were consistent with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) for which he was treated with IV insulin and aggressive hydration with successful resolution. Nivolumab was stopped and the patient was discharged on a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Further outpatient workup was significant for A1c 5.9% (n&amp;lt;5.7%), C-peptide (with glucose 220mg/dL) 0.7 (n=0.8-3.9ng/mL), glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GAD Ab) 11 (n&amp;lt;5.0U/mL). Insulin antibody and islet cell antibody IgG were negative. Due to the acute onset in the presentation and the recent use of Nivolumab, the patient was diagnosed with ICI-T1DM. He remained insulin-dependent after discharge. Unfortunately, soon after, he began showing signs of liver failure and ultimately underwent liver transplantation. Conclusion: This case highlights two crucial aspects - the importance of screening for autoantibodies prior to initiating an ICI and the necessity for guidelines in diagnosing ICI-T1DM. Given the evidence linking positive GAD Ab to a higher risk of developing DKA and earlier onset ICI-T1DM, it is beneficial to screen patients for these autoantibodies prior to ICI initiation to identify those more susceptible to developing ICIDM1. It may also be beneficial to obtain a C-peptide level prior to initiation to evaluate for endogenous insulin production. Additionally, while several factors support the diagnosis of ICI-T1DM such as recent ICI use, acute DKA presentation, low C-peptide levels, and the need for exogenous insulin, there is currently no specific criteria for the formal diagnosis of ICI-T1DM. Consequently, the decision to continue an ICI remains uncertain until specific diagnostic criteria are established for healthcare providers. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Impact of a pilot advanced provider-based comprehensive management program to support patients with immunotoxicity-related adverse events in a cancer care setting.

31 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancers. Despite the clinical benefits of the targeted therapy, its use is associated with a spectrum of autoimmune side effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Toxicities are distinct from those associated with standard chemotherapy, and, if unrecognized and not managed aggressively, can become life-threatening. Early recognition and management of these toxicities, as well as approaches toward cautious retreatment following resolution is essential in clinical practice. Methods: As part of larger effort to provide efficient and proactive care to patients, advanced provider-based comprehensive management program was established in an academic hospital ambulatory setting to identify and manage the full spectrum of unique toxicities of patients receiving standard-of-care ICIs. The goal of the program was to manage patients with severe toxicity including seamless transitions of care between outpatient and inpatient settings to obviate the need for future acute care utilizations. The program provided real-time guidance to providers with clinical questions on use of ICIs, actively navigated patients with suspected immunotherapy toxicity and assessed ongoing education needs for both outpatient and inpatient services. A retrospective analysis of 2-year post implementation of the program was performed with inpatient to outpatient referrals as primary outcome and median length of stay and 30-day readmission rate as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 388 inpatient admissions (222 Year-1 and 166 Year-2) were included. Preliminary analysis revealed a 25% decrease in immunotoxicity related inpatient admissions (admission rate decreased from 2.8 to 1.9) while patients treated with immunotherapy increased by 7%. The number of ambulatory encounters with the navigator increased by 40% (362 vs 509). The median length of stay for those on the dedicated program decreased by 27.3% (5.5 vs. 4 days) and the 30-day readmission rate decreased by 15.8% (24.3 vs. 20.5) from Year 1 to Year 2. Conclusions: Preliminary analysis suggests the program improved patient care, provided timelier follow-up and management, and reduced the delay to return to anti-cancer treatment. The ambulatory program provided proactive intervention, diagnosis, and management of immunotherapy related toxicities, preventing hospitalization and readmission to the hospital. Although initial findings suggest improved preliminary outcomes, further analysis is required to make any causal inference on the true and sustainable impact of the intervention.

Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Nephrotoxicity: A Position Statement from the American Society of Onco-nephrology

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and are now the backbone of therapy for several malignancies. However, ICIs can cause a spectrum of renal immune-related adverse events including acute kidney injury (AKI), most commonly manifesting as acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), though glomerular disease and electrolyte disturbances have also been reported. In this position statement by the American Society of Onco-nephrology (ASON), we summarize the incidence and risk factors for ICI-AKI, pathophysiological mechanisms and clinicopathological features of ICI-AKI. We also discuss novel diagnostic approaches and promising biomarkers for ICI-AKI. From expert panel consensus, we provide clinical practice points for the initial assessment and diagnosis of ICI-AKI, management and immunosuppressive therapy, and consideration for re-challenge with ICI following AKI episodes. In addition, we explore ICI use in special populations such as kidney transplant recipients and propose key areas of focus for future research and clinical investigation.

Perioperative immunotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Recent years have witnessed significant advancements in the treatment of lung cancer with immunotherapy, primarily centered on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Numerous clinical studies have evaluated or are currently evaluating the clinical benefits of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative use of ICIs. These findings have notably reshaped the landscape of perioperative treatment for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Comparing different treatment modes, adding ICIs in the adjuvant phase to neoadjuvant treatment with ICIs and chemotherapy may not improve survival outcomes for patients with resectable NSCLC and may be associated with increased adverse events. For prognostic factors, ctDNA minimal residual disease (MRD) status might serve as an early predictor of achieving pathological remission. For study endpoints, a positive result with PFS as the primary endpoint may not necessarily translate into overall survival benefits. For perioperative immunotherapy, challenges persist, including the current lack of sensitive and reliable biomarkers, the effect of neoadjuvant therapy on surgical risk as well as the selection of the appropriate study endpoint. In this review, we discuss recent and ongoing trials investigating strategies of neoadjuvant, adjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy in NSCLC, while also proposing considerations for future directions in this continuously evolving field.

Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, offering hope for patients with various malignancies. However, along with their remarkable anticancer effects, ICIs can also trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One such noteworthy complication is the development of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), which particularly resembles Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). The aim of this review is to provide insights into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic issues, and treatment considerations of ICI-induced DM (ICI-DM), emphasizing the importance of early recognition and management to mitigate adverse outcomes. Although still rare, the incidence has increased with the widespread use of ICIs, especially PD-1/PD-L1 blockers (from 0.2% to 1.9%). Factors affecting the development of ICI-DM, such as specific ICIs, patient demographics, and genetic predispositions, are discussed. The complex interplay between immune dysregulation and pancreatic β-cell destruction contributes to diagnostic challenges, with presentations varying from asymptomatic hyperglycemia to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Management strategies prioritize meticulous glycemic and electrolyte regulation along with tailored intravenous insulin therapy in cases of DKA. DM remission is rare, therefore treatment with both long-acting insulin at bedtime and short-acting insulin before meals is needed in longterm. Total daily insulin requirements can be estimated at 0.3-0.4 units/kg/day for most patients as a starting dose.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR and pMMR colorectal cancers: therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of response.

Approximately 15% of locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) have DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), resulting in high microsatellite instability and a high tumour mutational burden. These cancers are frequently sensitive to therapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the metastatic setting. This sensitivity seems to be even more pronounced in locally advanced disease, and organ preservation has become a realistic aim in ongoing clinical trials involving patients with dMMR rectal cancer. By contrast, metastatic CRCs with proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) are generally resistant to ICIs, although a proportion of locally advanced pMMR tumours seem to have a high degree of sensitivity to ICIs. In this Review, we describe the current and emerging clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with dMMR and pMMR CRC, and the potential advantages (based on a biological rationale) of such an approach. We discuss how neoadjuvant 'window-of-opportunity' trials are being leveraged to progress biomarker discovery and we provide an overview of potential predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, exploring the challenges faced when evaluating such biomarkers in biopsy-derived samples. Lastly, we describe how these discoveries might be used to drive a rational approach to trialling novel immunotherapeutic strategies in patients with pMMR CRC, with the ultimate aim of disease eradication and the generation of long-term immunosurveillance.

Optimized patient-specific immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for cancer treatment based on tumor immune microenvironment modeling.

Enhancing patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial in cancer immunotherapy. We aim to create a data-driven mathematical model of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and utilize deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to optimize patient-specific ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy (ICC). Using patients' genomic and transcriptomic data, we develop an ordinary differential equations (ODEs)-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model to characterize interactions among chemotherapy, ICIs, immune cells, and tumor cells. A DRL agent is trained to determine the personalized optimal ICC therapy. Numerical experiments with real-world data demonstrate that the proposed TIME model can predict ICI therapy response. The DRL-derived personalized ICC therapy outperforms predefined fixed schedules. For tumors with extremely low CD8 + T cell infiltration ('extremely cold tumors'), the DRL agent recommends high-dosage chemotherapy alone. For tumors with higher CD8 + T cell infiltration ('cold' and 'hot tumors'), an appropriate chemotherapy dosage induces CD8 + T cell proliferation, enhancing ICI therapy outcomes. Specifically, for 'hot tumors', chemotherapy and ICI are administered simultaneously, while for 'cold tumors', a mid-dosage of chemotherapy makes the TIME 'hotter' before ICI administration. However, in several 'cold tumors' with rapid resistant tumor cell growth, ICC eventually fails. This study highlights the potential of utilizing real-world clinical data and DRL algorithm to develop personalized optimal ICC by understanding the complex biological dynamics of a patient's TIME. Our ODE-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model offers a theoretical framework for determining the best use of ICI, and the proposed DRL agent may guide personalized ICC schedules.

The Importance of Predictive Biomarkers and Their Correlation with the Response to Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors-Impact on Clinical Practice.

Background/Objectives: Immunotherapy has changed the therapeutic approach for various solid tumors, especially lung tumors, malignant melanoma, renal and urogenital carcinomas, demonstrating significant antitumor activity, with tolerable safety profiles and durable responses. However, not all patients benefit from immunotherapy, underscoring the need for predictive biomarkers that can identify those most likely to respond to treatment. Methods: The integration of predictive biomarkers into clinical practice for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) holds great promise for personalized cancer treatment. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), gene expression profiles and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential in predicting ICI responses across various cancers. Results: Challenges such as standardization, validation, regulatory approval, and cost-effectiveness must be addressed to realize their full potential. Predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing the clinical use of ICIs in cancer therapy. Conclusions: While significant progress has been made, further research and collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and regulatory institutes are essential to overcome the challenges of clinical implementation. However, little is known about the relationship between local and systemic immune responses and the correlation with response to oncological therapies and patient survival.

A case of gastritis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitor treated with infliximab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in various organs. Herein, we present a rare case involving a patient with immunotherapy-related gastritis who developed refractory vomiting and anorexia after treatment with nivolumab for cutaneous malignant melanoma. The patient was treated with oral corticosteroids, but the efficacy was limited. The symptoms improved markedly after treatment with infliximab. With the increasing use of ICIs, the number of reports of gastritis due to irAEs has also increased. Health care providers treating malignancies should be aware of this side effect and know how to diagnose and treat it.

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis-like eruptions in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by targeting immune checkpoints such as PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4, but concerns about severe immune-related adverse events persist. The scarcity of literature on dermatologic implications, especially severe reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), highlights the urgent need for investigation. Our systematic review aims to address the gap in relevant literature by extensively examining the epidemiologic risk factors and management of SJS/TEN-like illnesses in ICI-treated patients to provide insights for risk assessment and clinical care. We identified 158 case reports that detailed the incidence of SJS/TEN in patients being treated with ICIs, examining demographic patterns, type of malignancy, clinical characteristics, and treatments linked to onset. We assessed mortality rates, risk elements, and the effectiveness of interventions to help guide clinical care. Analysis of 158 case reports revealed that SJS/TEN in ICI users is typically seen on average at the age of 63 and is more common in males. PD1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are often associated with various mucocutaneous patterns and significant risks with ICI use, especially TEN, which is linked to high morbidity and mortality rates. Our study notes limitations due to the inclusion of case reports or case series, such as potential publication and reporting biases, leading to skewed findings. Additionally, because of the heterogeneous reporting standards, the retrospective nature limits phenotypic precision, control for confounding variables, and data completeness. Our study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology, clinical features, management strategies, and outcomes of ICI-induced SJS/TEN, underscoring the importance of vigilant monitoring and personalized risk assessment in oncology practice. Continued research efforts are essential to optimize patient outcomes and enhance the safety profile of ICIs in cancer therapy.

Sialylation-associated long non-coding RNA signature predicts the prognosis, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy and chemotherapy options in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma

BackgroundSialylation in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) differs significantly from apoptotic and ferroptosis pathways. It plays a crucial role in cancer progression and immune response modulation. Exploring how sialylation affects tumor behavior and its link with long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may provide new insights into UCEC prognosis and treatment.MethodsWe obtained RNA transcriptome, clinical, and mutation data of UCEC samples from the TCGA database. Our approach involved developing a risk model based on the co-expression patterns of sialylation genes and lncRNAs. Prognostic lncRNAs were identified through Cox regression and further refined using LASSO analysis. To understand the biological functions and pathways of model-associated differentially expressed genes (MADEGs), we conducted enrichment analyses. We also assessed the immune infiltration status of MADEGs using eight different algorithms, which helped in evaluating the potential for immunotherapy. Additionally, we validated the expression of these lncRNAs in UCEC using cell lines and clinical samples.ResultsWe developed a UCEC risk model using five sialylation-related lncRNAs (AC004884.2, AC026202.2, LINC01579, LINC00942, SLC16A1-AS1). This model, confirmed through Cox analysis and clinical evaluation, effectively predicted patient outcomes. Survival data analysis across entire cohort, as well as within training and test groups, indicated better survival in low-risk UCEC patients. Enrichment analyses linked MADEGs to sialylation functions and cancer pathways. High-risk patients showed increased responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as indicated by immunological assessments. Subgroup C2 patients showed superior outcomes and a robust response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Notably, LINC01579, LINC00942, and SLC16A1-AS1 were significantly overexpressed in UCEC clinical tumor samples as well as in Ishikawa and HEC-1-B cell lines, compared to the normal groups.ConclusionsThis lncRNA signature associated with sialylation could guide prognosis, enhance the understanding of molecular mechanisms, and inform treatment strategies in UCEC. It highlights the potential for the use of ICIs and chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of PARPis combined with an ICIs for advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis.

Although the intervention for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients has improved and survival time has increased, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs) and PARP inhibitors (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase inhibitors, PARPis) is still controversial. Previous studies revealed that the combined use of ICIs and PARPis led to increased antitumor activity. However, most of these combined regimens are nonrandomized controlled trials with small sample sizes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with PARPis in patients with advanced or metastatic TNBC. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. The results including the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs), were subjected to further analysis. Four studies involving 110 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The combined ORR and DCR were 23.6% and 53.6%, respectively; while the ORR and DCR of BRCAmut patients were 38.1% and 71.4%, respectively. The median PFS of the patients was 4.29 months. As for safety, the most common AEs were nausea (49.0%), anemia (44.3%) and fatigue (40.6%). Most of them were grade 1 or 2, and the incidence of adverse events ≥ III was obviously low. Except for anemia, the incidence of AEs ≥ III was < 10%. This meta-analysis revealed that the combination of ICIs and PARPis has good efficacy and safety for advanced or metastatic TNBC patients.

Digital ischemia: a rare immune-related adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitors-case report and review of the literature.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a crucial role in treating various cancers. While ICIs are invaluable in the fight against different cancers, they also pose the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range widely in symptoms and severity. Rheumatologic complications, including digital ischemia, are among the irAEs. While rare, they require early detection for effective management. The aim of the study is to present a case report on digital ischemia related to immunotherapy and to conduct a literature review on relevant cases. We present a case involving a patient from our oncology department who developed, pericarditis, digital ischemia and anti-centromere antibodies during immunotherapy with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We collaborated with our rheumatology department to initiate treatment, including corticosteroids, iloprost, and mycophenolate mofetil. Through the follow-up, the patient showed clinical improvement. A literature review identified only 10 relevant articles, highlighting the rarity of digital ischemia as an irAE. Corticosteroids and vasodilators were commonly used treatments, with amputation unavoidable in 40% of cases. IrAEs are becoming more common due to the widespread use of ICIs. For this reason, it is crucial to diagnose and treat rare IrAEs, such as digital ischemia, as early as possible to improve outcomes.

Immune-related events in individuals with solid tumors on immunotherapy associate with Th17 and Th2 signatures.

BACKGROUNDImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their associated morbidity/mortality are a key concern for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Prospective evaluation of the drivers of irAEs in a diverse pan-tumor cohort is needed to identify patients at greatest risk and to develop rational treatment and interception strategies.METHODSIn an observational study, we prospectively collected blood samples and performed regular clinical evaluations for irAEs in patients receiving ICI therapy as standard of care for solid tumors. We performed in-parallel analysis of cytokines by Luminex immunoassay and circulating immune cells by cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) at baseline and on treatment to investigate mechanisms of irAEs.RESULTSWe enrolled 111 patients, of whom 40.5% developed a symptomatic irAE (grade ≥ 2). Development of a grade ≥ 2 irAE was positively associated with the use of combination ICI and a history of an autoimmune disorder. Early changes in T helper 17 (Th17) (IL-6, IL-17f), type 2 (IL-5, IL-13, IL-25), and type 1 (TNF-α) cytokine signatures and congruent on-treatment expansions of Th17 and Th2 effector memory (Th2EM) T cell populations in peripheral blood were positively associated with the development of grade ≥2 irAEs. IL-6 levels were also associated with inferior cancer-specific survival and overall survival.CONCLUSIONSIn a diverse, prospective pan-tumor cohort, Th17 and Th2 skewing during early ICI treatment was associated with the development of clinically relevant irAEs but not antitumor responses, providing possible targets for monitoring and therapeutic interventions.FUNDINGJohns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, the NCI SPORE in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924), NCI grant (R50CA243627 to LD), the NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973), Swim Across America (to MY), NIAMS (K23AR075872 to LC), and imCORE-Genentech grant 137515 (to Johns Hopkins Medicine on behalf of MY).

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment and Incidence of Pancreatitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an approved therapy for the management of various advanced neoplasms. Limited reviews focus on the influence of this therapy resulting in pancreatitis. This review discusses the relationship between ICIs and their effects on the pancreas, including the incidence of pancreatitis, immunotherapy, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptors, driver mutations, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and immune-related adverse events. Additionally, it focuses on the clinical presentations, diagnosis, case studies, and mechanisms by which ICIs activate different pathways to cause pancreatitis. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies on ICI-associated pancreatitis. The review explores the incidence and epidemiology of ICI-induced pancreatitis, its clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies.The overall incidence of ICI-induced pancreatitis is estimated at 1-2%, with higher rates observed in combination therapy. Clinical presentations range from asymptomatic enzyme elevations to severe pancreatitis. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical symptoms, elevated pancreatic enzymes, and imaging findings, with MRI and endoscopic ultrasound showing promise in early detection. Management strategies include IV fluid administration, pain control, and nutritional support. The efficacy of corticosteroids remains controversial, and alternative immunosuppressants are being explored for steroid-refractory cases. Long-term monitoring is crucial due to the risk of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic insufficiency. This review highlights the need for further research to elucidate the exact mechanisms of ICI-associated pancreatic injury, develop predictive biomarkers, and refine treatment protocols. As ICI use continues to expand, a thorough understanding of this adverse event is essential for optimizing patient care and outcomes in cancer immunotherapy.