Head Computed Tomography Use Research Articles

Affordability impacts therapeutic intensity of acute management of severe traumatic brain injury patients: An exploratory study in Tanzania

IntroductionQuality health care in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is constrained by financing of care. Research questionWhat is the effect of ability to pay on critical care management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI)? Material and MethodsData on sTBI patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, were collected between 2016 and 2018, and included payor mechanisms for hospitalization costs. Patients were grouped as those who could afford care and those who were unable to pay. ResultsSixty-seven patients with sTBI were included. Of those enrolled, 44 (65.7%) were able to pay and 15 (22.3%) were unable to pay costs of care upfront. Eight (11.9%) patients did not have a documented source of payment (unknown identity or excluded from further analysis). Overall mechanical ventilation rates were 81% (n=36) in the affordable group and 100% (n=15) in the unaffordable group (p=0.08). Computed tomography (CT) rates were 71.6% (n=48) overall, 100% (n=44) and 0% respectively (p<0.01); Surgical rates were 16.4% (n=11) overall, 18.2% (n=8) vs. 13.3% (n=2) (p=0.67) respectively. Two-week mortality was 59.7% overall (n=40), 47.7% (n=21) in the affordable group and 73.3% (n=11) in the unaffordable group (p=0.09) (adjusted OR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.07-2.41, p=0.32). Discussion and ConclusionAbility to pay appears to have a strong association with the use of head CT and a weak association with mechanical ventilation in the management of sTBI. Inability to pay increases redundant or sub-optimal care, and imposes a financial burden on patients and their relatives.

Association of Clinical Guidelines and Decision Support with Computed Tomography Use in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

To examine whether the presence of clinical guidelines and clinical decision support (CDS) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are associated with lower use of head computed tomography (CT). We conducted a cross-sectional study of 45 pediatric emergency departments (EDs) in the Pediatric Hospital Information System from 2015 through 2019. We included children discharged with mTBI and surveyed ED clinical directors to ascertain the presence and implementation year of clinical guidelines and CDS. The association of clinical guidelines and CDS with CT use was assessed, adjusting for relevant confounders. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated ED length of stay and rates of 3-day ED revisits and admissions after revisits. There were 216 789 children discharged with mTBI, and CT was performed during 20.3% (44 114/216 789) of ED visits. Adjusted hospital-specific CT rates ranged from 11.8% to 34.7% (median 20.5%, IQR 17.3%, 24.3%). Of the 45 EDs, 17 (37.8%) had a clinical guideline, 9 (20.0%) had CDS, and 19 (42.2%) had neither. Compared with EDs with neither a clinical guideline nor CDS, visits to EDs with CDS (aOR 0.52 [0.47, 0.58]) or a clinical guideline (aOR 0.83 [0.78, 0.89]) had lower odds of including a CT for mTBI. ED length of stay and revisit rates did not differ based on the presence of a clinical guideline or CDS. Clinical guidelines for mTBI, and particularly CDS, were associated with lower rates of head CT use without adverse clinical outcomes.

Use of Neuroimaging for Children With Seizure in General and Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Seizure is a common reason for children to visit the emergency department (ED). Pediatric and general EDs may obtain computed tomography (CT) scans of the head for seizure at different rates. To compare rates of head CT for pediatric seizure between general and pediatric EDs. This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for patients <21years of age presenting to an ED with a chief complaint or diagnosis of seizure between 2006 to 2017. Of these patients, we compared head CT use between general and pediatric EDs among patients with fever, trauma, and co-diagnosis of epilepsy using univariable risk differences and in a multivariable logistic regression model. More than 5 (5.4) million (78.8%) and 1.5 million (21.2%) pediatric patients with seizure presented to general and pediatric EDs, respectively. Of those, 22.4% (1.21 million) and 13.2% (192,357) underwent CT scans of the head, respectively, a risk difference of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-16.1). General EDs obtained CT scans of the head more often in patients with epilepsy (risk difference 17.9% [95% CI 4.0-31.9]), without fever (12.2% [95% CI 3.1-21.4]), and without trauma (10.6% [95% CI 4.4-16.8]). Presenting to a general ED, being afebrile, or having trauma were associated with head CT with adjusted odds ratios of 1.7 (95% CI 1.0-3.2), 4.9 (95% CI 2.6-9.2), and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.4), respectively. Age, gender, and epilepsy were not associated with head CT among all patients with seizure. Children with seizure are more likely to undergo CT scans of the head at general EDs compared with pediatric EDs.

Adapting two American Decision Aids for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury to the Canadian Context Using the Nominal Group Technique.

Decision aids are patient-focused tools that have the potential to reduce the overuse of head computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective of this study was to create a consensus among Canadian mild traumatic brain injury and emergency medicine experts on modifications required to adapt two American decision aids about head CT use for adult and paediatric mild traumatic brain injury to the Canadian context. We invited 21 Canadian stakeholders and the two authors of the American decision aids to a Nominal Group Technique consensus meeting to generate suggestions for adapting the decision aids. This method encourages idea generation and sharing between team members. Each idea was discussed and then prioritised using a voting system. We collected data using videotaping, writing material and online collaborative writing tools. The modifications proposed were analysed using a qualitative thematic content analysis. Twenty-one participants took part in the meeting, including researchers and clinician researchers (n = 9; 43%), patient partners (n = 3; 14%) and decision makers (n = 2; 10%). A total of 84 ideas were generated. Participants highlighted the need to clarify the purpose of the decision aids, the nature of the problem being addressed and the target population. The tools require sociocultural adaptations, better identification of their target population, better description of head CT utility, advantages and related risks, modification of the visual and written representation of the risk of brain injury and head CT use, and locally adapted, patient follow-up plans. This study based on a Nominal Group Technique identified several adaptations for two American decision aids about head CT use for mild traumatic brain injury to support their use in Canada's different healthcare, social, cultural and legal context. These adaptations concerned the target users of the decision aids, the information presented, and how the benefits and risks were communicated in the decision aids. Future steps include prototyping the two adapted decision aids, conducting formative evaluations with actual emergency department patients and clinicians, and measuring the impact of the adapted tools on CT scan use.

Clinical use and indications for head computed tomography in children presenting with acute medical illness in a low- and middle-income setting.

Computed tomography (CT) imaging is an indispensable tool in the management of acute paediatric neurological illness providing rapid answers that facilitate timely decisions and interventions that may be lifesaving. While clear guidelines exist for use of CT in trauma to maximise individual benefits against the risk of radiation exposure and the cost to the healthcare system, the same is not the case for medical emergency. The study primarily aimed to retrospectively describe indications for non-trauma head CT and the findings at a tertiary paediatric hospital. Records of children presenting with acute illness to the medical emergency unit of Red Cross War Children's Hospital, Cape Town, over one year (2013) were retrospectively reviewed. Participants were included if they underwent head CT scan within 24 hours of presentation with a non-trauma event. Clinical data and reports of CT findings were extracted. Inclusion criteria were met by 311 patients; 188 (60.5%) were boys. The median age was 39.2 (IQR 12.6-84.0) months. Most common indications for head CT were seizures (n = 169; 54.3%), reduced level of consciousness (n = 140;45.0%), headache (n = 74;23.8%) and suspected ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) malfunction (n = 61;19.7%). In 217 (69.8%) patients CT showed no abnormal findings. In the 94 (30.2%) with abnormal CT results the predominant findings were hydrocephalus (n = 54;57.4%) and cerebral oedema (n = 29;30.9%). Papilloedema was more common in patients with abnormal CT (3/56; 5.4%) compared with none in those with normal CT; P = 0.015; while long tract signs were found in 42/169 (24.9%) and 23/56 (41.1%) of patients with normal and abnormal CT findings, respectively; P = 0.020. Post-CT surgery was required by 47(15.1%) of which 40 (85.1%) needed a ventricular drainage. A larger proportion of patients with VPS (25/62; 40.3%) required surgery compared to patients without VPS (22/249; 8.8%; P<0.001). A majority of head CT scans in children with medical emergency with acute neurological illness were normal. Patients with VPS constituted the majority of patients with abnormal CT scans that required subsequent neurosurgical intervention. Evidence-based guidelines are required to guide the best use of head CT in the management of children without head trauma.

Influence of physicians' seniority on head computed tomography use for patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness.

ObjectiveVertigo/dizziness is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. Emergency physicians (EPs) must distinguish patients with dizziness/vertigo owing to serious central nervous system (CNS) disorders. We aimed to evaluate the association between physician seniority and use of head computed tomography (CT) and ED length of stay (LOS) in patients presenting to the ED with isolated dizziness/vertigo.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included adult patients with non-traumatic dizziness/vertigo in the ED. EPs were categorized according to seniority: junior (less than 6 years’ clinical experience), intermediate (7–12 years), and senior (≥12 years).ResultsAmong 2589 patients with isolated dizziness/vertigo, 460 (17.8%) received brain CT; 46 (1.78%) had CNS disorder as a final diagnosis. Junior and intermediate EPs ordered more CT examinations than senior EPs: (odds ratio [OR] = 1.329, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.002–1.769 and OR = 1.531, 95% CI: 1.178–2.001, respectively). Patients treated by junior and intermediate EPs had lower patient ED LOS (OR = −0.432, 95% CI: −0.887 to 0.024 and OR = −0.436, 95% CI: −0.862 to −0.011).ConclusionsWe revealed different judgment strategies among senior, intermediate, and junior EPs. Senior EPs ordered fewer CT examinations for patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness but had longer patient LOS.

Sources of Variability in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Use Among Emergency Departments in New Jersey.

Published guidelines have been developed to limit ionizing radiation exposure in children related to diagnostic computed tomography (CT). This study examines the sources of variability in head CT use in children in emergency departments (EDs) in New Jersey despite the presence of such consensus recommendations. The New Jersey Hospital Association (NJHA) Clinical Repository was queried for study data on all patients younger than 18 years discharged from the ED over a 1-year period. Patient information collected included: treating hospital, patient age, discharge diagnosis, use of head CT, children's hospital (CH) certification, presence of licensed in-patient pediatric beds, association with a hospital system and hospital annual pediatric ED volume. A potential diagnosis requiring a head CT (PDRCT) was defined as one of the following discharge diagnoses: Head Injury, Seizure, Syncope or Headache. Analysis of CT use per 10,000 ED visits was performed through ANOVA, analysis of means for variances, and χ. A total of 735,866 ED visits were examined with 16,942 (2.3%) undergoing head CTs. Mean Pediatric Head CT use per 10,000 ED visits for the state was 275 (±16; range, 27-640). During the study period 47,169 (6.4%) ED visits met the PDRCT criteria, 11,495 (27%) of which underwent head CTs. Mean Pediatric Head CT use in this group per 10,000 PDRCT visits was 2948 (±152; range, 728-5806). Characteristics associated with lowest use of head CTs in the PDRCT group included: ED census greater than 10,000 visits per year, CH designation, and younger patient. The presence of in-patient pediatric beds and association with a hospital system with or without an in system CH were not associated with lower head CT use. Despite existing recommendation regarding head CTs in children, there exists a large degree of variability in use of this diagnostic study in EDs in New Jersey.

Implementation of a brain injury screen MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma.

Head computed tomography (CT) is the current standard of care for evaluating infants at high risk of abusive head trauma. To both assess the feasibility of using a previously developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain injury screen (MRBRscreen) in the acute care setting in place of head CT to identify intracranial hemorrhage in high-risk infants and to compare the accuracy of a rapid imaging pulse sequence (single-shot T2 fast spin echo [ssT2FSE]) to a conventional pulse sequence (conventional T2 fast spin echo [conT2FSE]). This was a quality improvement initiative to evaluate infants <12months of age who were screened for intracranial hemorrhage using an MRBRscreen as part of clinical care. The MRBRscreen included axial conT2FSE, axial gradient recalled echo, coronal T1-weighted inversion recovery, axial diffusion-weighted image and an axial ssT2FSE. A comparison of ssT2FSE to conT2FSE with respect to lesion detection was also performed. Of 158 subjects, the MRBRscreen was able to be completed in 155 (98%); 9% (14/155) were abnormal. Ninety-four percent (137/145) of subjects underwent only an MRBRscreen and avoided both radiation from head CT and sedation from MRI. The axial ssT2FSE and conT2FSE results were congruent 99% of the time. An MRBRscreen in place of a head CT is feasible and potentially could decrease head CT use by more than 90% in this population. Using a rapid ssT2FSE in place of a conT2FSE can reduce total scan time without losing lesion detection. If an MRBRscreen is readily available, physicians' threshold to perform neuroimaging may be lowered and lead to earlier detection of abusive head trauma.

Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial

We evaluated a strategy to increase use of the test (Dix-Hallpike's test [DHT]) and treatment (canalith repositioning maneuver [CRM]) for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in emergency department (ED) dizziness visits. We conducted a stepped-wedge randomized trial in 6 EDs. The population was visits with dizziness as a principal reason for the visit. The intervention included educational sessions and decision aid materials. Outcomes were DHT or CRM documentation (primary), head computed tomography (CT) use, length of stay, admission, and 90-day stroke events. The analysis was multilevel logistic regression with intervention, month, and hospital as fixed effects and provider as a random effect. We assessed fidelity with monitoring intervention use and semistructured interviews. We identified 7,635 dizziness visits during 18 months. The DHT or CRM was documented in 1.5% of control visits (45/3,077; 95% confidence interval 1% to 1.9%) and 3.5% of intervention visits (159/4,558; 95% confidence interval 3% to 4%; difference 2%, 95% confidence interval 1.3% to 2.7%). Head CT use was lower in intervention visits compared with control visits (44.0% [1,352/3,077] versus 36.9% [1,682/4,558]). No differences were observed in admission or 90-day subsequent stroke risk. In fidelity evaluations, providers who used the materials typically reported positive clinical experiences but provider engagement was low at facilities without an emergency medicine residency program. These findings provide evidence that an implementation strategy of a benign paroxysmal positional vertigo-focused approach to ED dizziness visits can be successful and safe in promoting evidence-based care. Absolute rates of DHT and CRM use, however, were still low, which relates in part to our broad inclusion criteria for dizziness visits.

Utility of Shunt Series in the Evaluation of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Dysfunction in Adults.

When patients present to emergency departments (EDs) with symptoms suspicious for ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction, evaluation often includes imaging of the shunt with both computed tomography (CT) of the head without contrast and a plain radiograph "shunt series" (SS). Recent literature has called into question the diagnostic value of the SS for the detection of ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications, suggesting that the plain radiographs provide redundant information and unnecessary exposure to radiation. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of abnormal SS plain radiography and head CT in the evaluation of shunt malfunction in all adult ED patients and to measure the association of abnormalities on CT and SS with surgical intervention. We performed a retrospective chart review of all emergency department encounters at an urban level I trauma center between August 1, 2013 and October 3, 2018 in which an SS and head CT examination were performed within 24h of each other. We described the results of imaging studies qualitatively and descriptive statistics were performed. Positive findings on CT were significantly associated with the decision to proceed to surgery. Positive findings on SS, however, were not significantly associated with the decision to proceed to surgery. The potential information gained from SS and convenience of ordering simultaneously with head CT does not appear to outweigh the risk of increased radiation exposure to the patient, the additional costs of the study, and the potential delay in time to head CT. These findings support the initial use of head CT in evaluation of shunt malfunction.

The Yield of Computed Tomography of the Head Among Patients Presenting With Syncope: A Systematic Review.

Overuse of head computed tomography (CT) for syncope has been reported. However, there is no literature synthesis on this overuse. We undertook a systematic review to determine the use and yield of head CT and risk factors for serious intracranial conditions among syncope patients. We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from inception until June 2017. Studies including adult syncope patients with part or all of patients undergoing CT head were included. We excluded case reports, reviews, letters, and pediatric studies. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and collected data on CT head use, diagnostic yield (proportion with acute hemorrhage, tumors or infarct), and risk of bias. We report pooled percentages, I2 , and Cochran's Q-test. Seventeen articles with 3,361 syncope patients were included. In eight ED studies (n=1,669), 54.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]= 34.9%-73.2%) received head CT with a 3.8% (95% CI= 2.6%-5.1%) diagnostic yield and considerable heterogeneity. In six in-hospital studies (n=1,289), 44.8% (95% CI= 26.4%-64.1%) received head CT with a 1.2% (95% CI= 0.5%-2.2%) yield and no heterogeneity. In two articles, all patients had CT (yield 2.3%) and the third enrolled patients ≥ 65 years old (yield 7.7%). Abnormal neurologic findings, age ≥ 65 years, trauma, warfarin use, and seizure/stroke history were identified as risk factors. The quality of all articles referenced was strong. More than half of patients with syncope underwent CT head with a diagnostic yield of 1.1% to 3.8%. A future large prospective study is needed to develop a robust risk tool.

Reduction of Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Closed Head Injury Evaluation at a Nonpediatric Community Emergency Department

The purpose of this study was to determine if implementation of a Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)-based Closed Head Injury Assessment Tool could safely decrease computed tomography (CT) use for pediatric head injury evaluation at a nonpediatric community emergency department (ED). A quality improvement project was initiated at a nonpediatric community ED to implement an institution-specific, PECARN-based Pediatric Closed Head Injury Assessment Tool. Baseline head CT use at the participating ED was determined for children with closed head injury through retrospective chart review from March 2014 through November 2015. Head injury patients were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD)-9 codes for head injury, unspecified (959.01) and concussion with and without loss of consciousness (850-850.9) until October 2015, after which ICD-9 was no longer used. To identify eligible patients after October 2015, lists of all pediatric patients evaluated at the participating ED were reviewed, and patients were included in the analysis if they had a physician-assigned discharge diagnosis of head injury or concussion. Exclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, penetrating head trauma, history of brain tumor, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, bleeding disorder, or presentation>24 hours postinjury. Medical history, injury mechanism, symptoms, head CT use, and disposition were recorded. Implementation of the Pediatric Closed Head Injury Assessment Tool was achieved through provider education sessions beginning in December 2015 and ending in August 2016. Head CT use was monitored for 12 months postimplementation, from September 2016 through August 2017. Patients were classified into low, intermediate, or high risk for clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) by chart review. ED length of stay (LOS), disposition, and ED returns within 72 hours were recorded. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables, using Kruskal-Wallis test. A total of 252 children with closed head injury were evaluated preimplementation (March 2014 through November 2015), 132 children were evaluated during implementation (December 2015 through August 2016), and 172 children were evaluated postimplementation (September 2016 through August 2017). Overall CT use decreased from 37.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]= 31.7-43.7) preimplementation to 16.9% (95% CI= 11.3-22.5) postimplementation (p<0.001). Only 1% (95% CI= 0%-2.9%) of low-risk patients received a head CT postimplementation compared to 22.6% (95% CI= 16.1%-29.1%) preimplementation (p<0.001). CT use among patients ≥ 24 months decreased from 42.9% (95% CI= 36.5%-49.6%) to 19.6% (95% CI= 13.1%-26.1%; p<0.001) and remained low and unchanged for patients<24 months. Transfers to a pediatric trauma center and ED returns within 72 hours were unchanged, while median ED LOS improved from 1.5 to 1.3 hours (p=0.03). There were no missed ciTBIs after implementation of the guideline. Implementation of the PECARN-based Pediatric Closed Head Injury Assessment Tool reduced head CT use in a nonpediatric ED. The greatest impact was seen among children aged ≥ 24 months at very low risk for ciTBI.

Trends in Pediatric Head CT Use: Looking Beyond the Ivory Tower.

* Abbreviations: ciTBI — : clinically important traumatic brain injury CT — : computed tomography ED — : emergency department LOC — : loss of consciousness PECARN — : Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network TBI — : traumatic brain injury In this month’s Pediatrics , Burstein et al1 report disappointing statistics in their work entitled “Use of CT for Head Trauma: 2007–2015.” Using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a representative data set for emergency department (ED) visits,2 they found that 32% of pediatric patients presenting for head trauma had computed tomography (CT) imaging as part of their evaluation. This proportion was unchanged over the study period despite publication of algorithms3–5 and an international effort intended to safely decrease unnecessary radiation exposure from head CTs among infants and children with head injuries. Additionally, they reported that ∼90% of US children received their trauma care at general (nonteaching and nonchildren’s) hospitals, where CT use was higher.1 Some history regarding CT use for pediatric head injury is helpful. In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics reviewed treatment of minor head injury and divided recommended evaluation and treatment by whether there was brief loss of consciousness (LOC).6 Head CT imaging was recommended for patients with LOC. If the LOC was … Address correspondence to Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108. E-mail: susan.bratton{at}hsc.utah.edu

Use of Head Computed Tomography (CT) in the Pediatric Emergency Department in Evaluation of Children With New-Onset Afebrile Seizure.

Cranial computed tomography (CT) is not recommended in the routine evaluation of children with first afebrile seizure due to its low yield. The objective was to assess the current practice in our pediatric emergency department regarding the use of head CT in children with first afebrile seizure and to identify the factors that lead to ordering a head CT. Medical records of patients between 1 month and 18 years old evaluated at our emergency department for presentation of first afebrile seizure between 2010 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Data extracted include age, gender, seizure type, single or multiple seizures at presentation, seizure duration, predisposing conditions to seizures (ie, history of developmental delay), and whether a head CT was performed. Contingency tables with chi-square analyses were used to determine which variables were associated with increased use of head CT. Of 155 patients (88M/67F) included in the study, 72 (46.5%) underwent head CT and only 3 had clinically significant findings that did not require acute management. There were no differences in CT use by age, sex, seizure type, seizure number, seizure risk factors, or findings on physical examination. Head CT was performed more frequently in cases with seizures ≥5 minutes and unknown seizure duration ( P = .04). Despite existing evidence, the emergent head CT rate was high in our cohort. Children with seizure duration of ≥5 minutes or of unknown duration were more likely to undergo head CT in our emergency department.

Emergency Department Time Course for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Workup.

IntroductionMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common cause for visits to the emergency department (ED). The actual time required for an ED workup of a patient with mTBI in the United States is not well known. National emergency medicine organizations have recommended reducing unnecessary testing, including head computed tomography (CT) for these patients.10MethodsTo examine this issue, we developed a care map that included each step of evaluation of mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale Score 13–15) – from initial presentation to the ED to discharge. Time spent at each step was estimated by a panel of United States emergency physicians and nurses. We subsequently validated time estimates using retrospectively collected, real-time data at two EDs. Length of stay (LOS) time differences between admission and discharged patients were calculated for patients being evaluated for mTBI.ResultsEvaluation for mTBI was estimated at 401 minutes (6.6 hours) in EDs. Time related to head CT comprised about one-half of the total LOS. Real-time data from two sites corroborated the estimate of median time difference between ED admission and discharge, at 6.3 hours for mTBI.ConclusionLimiting use of head CT as part of the workup of mTBI to more serious cases may reduce time spent in the ED and potentially improve overall ED throughput.

Physicians' Risk Tolerance and Head Computed Tomography Use for Pediatric Patients With Minor Head Injury.

Traumatic brain injury is the leading cause of death and disability in children worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the association between physician risk tolerance and head computed tomography (CT) use in patients with minor head injury (MHI) in the emergency department (ED). We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients (<17 years old) with MHI in the ED and then administered 2 questionnaires (a risk-taking subscale [RTS] of the Jackson Personality Inventory and a malpractice fear scale [MFS]) to attending physicians who had evaluated these patients and made decisions regarding head CT use. The primary outcome was head CT use during ED evaluation; the secondary outcome was ED length of stay and final diagnosis of intracranial injury (ICI). Of 523 patients with MHI, 233 (44.6%) underwent brain CT, and 16 (3.1%) received a final diagnosis of ICI. Among the 16 emergency physicians (EPs), the median scores of the MFS and RTS were 22 (interquartile range, 17-26) and 23 (interquartile range, 19-25), respectively. Emergency physicians who were most risk averse tended to order more head CT scans compared with the more risk-tolerant EPs (56.96% vs 37.37%; odds ratio, 8.463; confidence interval, 2.783-25.736). The ED length of stay (P = 0.442 and P = 0.889) and final diagnosis (P = 0.155 and P = 0.835) of ICI were not significantly associated with the RTS and MFS scores. Individual EP risk tolerance, as measured by RTS, was predictive of CT use in pediatric patients with MHI.

UTILIZATION OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR PEDIATRIC HEAD TRAUMA FROM 2007–2014 IN THE UNITED STATES: BEFORE AND AFTER PECARN CLINICAL DECISION RULES

Abstract BACKGROUND The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) clinical prediction rules identify children at low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injury in whom computed tomography (CT) neuro-imaging can safely be avoided. Since publication in 2009, these rules have been externally validated and are widely used in the Emergency Department (ED) assessment of children with acute head trauma. OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine if the proportion of children receiving CT-imaging in US EDs following head trauma has decreased following the development of PECARN rules. DESIGN/METHODS This study was a cross-sectional study using the National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey (NHAMCS) database from 2007–2014. NHAMCS collects data on approximately 30,000 nationally representative visits annually to 300 randomly selected U.S EDs. We included all children &lt;18 years old presenting with a chief complaint or discharge diagnosis of head injury. We collected data on patient demographics, reason for ED visit, discharge diagnosis, patient disposition, and use of head CT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify characteristics of CT use, with appropriate weighting to account for the survey methodology. The primary outcome was proportion of children receiving a head CT before and after 2009. RESULTS There were 55,253 paediatric visits during the 8-year study period. Among these, 2,783 (5.3% 95%CI 5.0%-5.6%) met inclusion criteria, representing 12,417,725 paediatric head trauma visits. Median patient age was 6 years (IQR 2–13 years), 62% were male, and a majority were evaluated in non-teaching and non-paediatric hospitals (88% and 90%, respectively). Overall, 32% (95%CI 29%-35%) underwent CT neuroimaging. There was no significant difference in CT use after 2009 (31% after vs. 33% before, p=0.41). Multivariate analysis similarly demonstrated no difference after adjustment for patient age, gender, race, insurance provider, paediatric or teaching hospital, admission status and triage acuity (AOR 1.02 after vs. before, 95%CI 0.79–1.32, p=0.85). Factors associated with increased CT use were age ≥2 years (AOR 1.4, 95%CI 1.1–1.9, p=0.02), admission (AOR 5.3, 95%CI 2.2–12.4, p&lt;0.001), highest triage acuity (AOR 7.3, 95%CI 3.5–15.3, p&lt;0.001) and presentation to a non-teaching (AOR 1.5, 95%CI 1.1–2.2, p=0.02) or non-paediatric (AOR 1.5, 95%CI 1.3–2.8, p&lt;0.01) hospital. CONCLUSION The use of CT neuro-imaging did not decrease in the 5-year period following derivation of PECARN rules. Findings suggest an important need for quality improvement initiatives to ensure appropriate CT utilization among head injured children.

Utilization of head CT during injury visits to United States emergency departments: 2012–2015

IntroductionStudies have shown increasing utilization of head computed tomography (CT) imaging of emergency department (ED) patients presenting with an injury-related visit. Multiple initiatives, including the Choosing Wisely™ campaign and evidence-based clinical decision support based on validated decision rules, have targeted head CT use in patients with injuries. Therefore, we investigated national trends in the use of head CT during injury-related ED visits from 2012 to 2015. MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of data from the annual United States (U.S.) National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012 to 2015. The study population was defined as injury-related ED visits, and we sought to determine the percentage in which a head CT was ordered and, secondarily, to determine both the diagnostic yield of clinically significant intracranial findings and hospital characteristics associated with increased head CT utilization. ResultsBetween 2012 and 2015, 12.25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.48–13.02%) of injury-related visits received at least one head CT. Overall head CT utilization showed an increased trend during the study period (2012: 11.7%, 2015: 13.23%, p = 0.09), but the results were not statistically significant. The diagnostic yield of head CT for a significant intracranial injury over the period of four years was 7.4% (9.68% in 2012 vs. 7.67% in 2015, p = 0.23). ConclusionsHead CT use along with diagnostic yield has remained stable from 2012 to 2015 among patients presenting to the ED for an injury-related visit.

The Effect of an Observation Unit on Pediatric Minor Head Injury.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an observation unit (OU) in an emergency department on reducing unnecessary use of computed tomography (CT) for minor blunt head trauma. This study was a retrospective before-and-after study of pediatric patients 18 years or younger with minor blunt head trauma. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or 15 who presented to the emergency department were included in the analysis. The rates of head CT use in the period before and after the institution of the OU were compared. In total, 4706 patients were analyzed (2344 from the period before and 2362 from period after OU institution). The median age of the patients was 3 years, and 64% were male in each period. The rates of CT use were 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8%-6.7%) in the period before and 4.0% (95% CI, 3.3%-4.9%) in the period after OU institution (P = 0.01). The relative risk reduction was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.91). The rate of CT use decreased by 30% as a result of OU institution. The OU was an effective means of avoiding an unnecessary head CT for pediatric minor head injuries.

Big for small: Validating brain injury guidelines in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Brain injury guidelines (BIG) were developed to reduce overutilization of neurosurgical consultation (NC) as well as computed tomography (CT) imaging. Currently, BIG have been successfully applied to adult populations, but the value of implementing these guidelines among pediatric patients remains unassessed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the established BIG (BIG-1 category) for managing pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) without NC (no-NC). We prospectively implemented the BIG-1 category (normal neurologic examination, ICH ≤ 4 mm limited to one location, no skull fracture) to identify pediatric TBI patients (age, ≤ 21 years) that were to be managed no-NC. Propensity score matching was performed to match these no-NC patients to a similar cohort of patients managed with NC before the implementation of BIG in a 1:1 ratio for demographics, severity of injury, and type as well as size of ICH. Our primary outcome measure was need for neurosurgical intervention. A total of 405 pediatric TBI patients were enrolled, of which 160 (NC, 80; no-NC, 80) were propensity score matched. The mean age was 9.03 ± 7.47 years, 62.1% (n = 85) were male, the median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (13-15), and the median head Abbreviated Injury Scale score was 2 (2-3). A subanalysis based on stratifying patients by age groups showed a decreased in the use of repeat head CT (p = 0.02) in the no-NC group, with no difference in progression (p = 0.34) and the need for neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.9) compared with the NC group. The BIG can be safely and effectively implemented in pediatric TBI patients. Reducing repeat head CT in pediatric patients has long-term sequelae. Likewise, adhering to the guidelines helps in reducing radiation exposure across all age groups. Therapeutic/care management, level III.